c.seger portfolio vol.2

62
Architectural Portfolio Vol. 2 Claire Seger

Upload: cseger

Post on 24-Mar-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Architectural Portfolio Vol. 2

Claire Seger

Page 2: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 3: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

“Problems are only opportunities in work clothes.” -Henri Kaiser

Page 4: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Problem-solving has always been my greatest hobby. Since I was young, I’ve loved piecing together puzzles, answering riddles, and figuring out every math question. Architectural design presents some of the most challenging problems in this world that are just waiting to be solved. Each design decision has both consequences and benefits. As designers, we accept the responsibility to serve the future users of a space to the best of our ability. It is this idea of learning to think for the good of others, and not for ourselves, that makes architecture so difficult. Yet, this is also what excites me about architecture. The more complexities to any problem, the more creative I am encouraged to be, not for myself, but for others. The responsibility and opportunity to create positive change in my environment is incredibly exciting to me and I cannot wait to start!

Claire Seger, LEED Green AssociateBachelors of Architecture 2014 CandidateUniversity of Oregon

Phone: (402) 651-6493Email: [email protected] Portfolio: segerclaire.wix.com/portfolio

Page 5: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Coursework More...Studio Projects

02 Master Planning

04 Design + Build

05 Modular Systems

06 Recreation Design

03 Historical Reuse 07 Event & Site Response

01 Current Project

10 Luminaire 13 Resume

12 Photography

08 Detail Drawings

09 Trombe Wall

11 Personal Projects

Page 6: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

The studio traveled to Libreville, Gabon to conduct a participatory week-long workshop to help the Université Omar Bongo redefine their campus. Working with both students and faculty, we spent time analyzing and understanding the current conditions and asked students what the strengths, opportunities, weaknesses, and threats of their current campus are. We then facilitated non-architecture students to design their visions and master plan for their new campus. The group of students I facilitated focused on minimizing demolition and redeveloping the existing campus.

It was an amazing experience that allowed me to grow both personally and professionally, and reminded me how selfless and interactive design should be. Spring term the studio will be developing individual buildings to illustrate sustainable uses on a smaller scale. Stay posted for more information.

01

Term

inal

Stu

dio:

Gab

on U

nive

rsity

Pl

anni

ng &

Bui

ldin

g D

evel

opm

ent

Associate Professor Dr. Mark Gillem & Adjunct Faculty Barry Gordon Terminal Studio | Winter-Spring 2014

Scope: Visioning, Public Participation, Master Planning (75+ years), Landscape Design, Water Urbanism Research, Building Schematic Design, Envelope Detailing

Size: 120 Acres (Campus)

Current Project

Page 7: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 8: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Section A3 m1.5m3 m1.5m 1.5m10m

5m2.5m

1m

Section C10m

5m2.5m

1m

Character Sketch

Street & Quad Sections

Page 9: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Minimum Demolition Final Illustrative Plan

Page 10: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

1. Workshop in Libreville (Jan. 9-20)

Working with students, faculty, and staff to analyze the existing conditions (using Albert Humphrey’s SWOT Analysis) of the campus

Looking through precedents of successful designs and spaces (quads, streets, & nodes) of campuses worldwide and teaching non-architecture students the principles of design

Designing 4 alternatives and their phasing with students and faculty

2. Bringing it Home/Production (January-February)

Producing models, drawings, diagrams to illustrate the designs of the collaboration between the studio and the Gabonese students

Sharing experiences and outcomes of workshop via an open house, presentations, and out website/blog

3. Creating Regulating Plans usingForm-Based Codes (February)

To make a campus design that lasts, it is critical to think about future development

The Form-Based Codes specify:

Parcels of land for development, what type of development, build-to lines, setbacks, parking placements, designated open spaces, critical building entry points, minimum/maximum building heights, and building envelope standards

The Four Alternatives: 1. Minimum Demolition 2. Compact Infill 3. Radial Plan 4. Maximum Demolition

Reviewing and refining designs for both the master plan of the campus and the infrastructure

Presenting the designs and discoveries of the workshop to the Université Omar Bongo

Proj

ect T

imel

ine

Minimum Demolition Regulating Plan

Page 11: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

4. Design New Campus from Regulating Plans & Documentation (March)

To understand and test the effectiveness of our Regulating Plans, we redesigned the campus through the Form-Based Codes

In preparation for the term final presentation, we worked at documenting our processes and communicating the design principles of each alternative

5. Individual Building Schematic Design & Design Development (April-June)

This stage of the studio will be more similar to a traditional studio, in that we will design individual buildings on the campus design alternative of our choice.

We will later present our design schemes as examples of possible sustainable solutions when nine students and three professors from Université Omar Bongo travel to the University of Oregon in June

7. Come to a Design Consensus (June)

Representatives and the instructors from the University of Oregon terminal studio will return to Libreville and meet with students, faculty, and administration to decide and develop a final master plan using the knowledge gained from the four alternative iterations

Photo Collage Vignette

Page 12: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

This project was to re-vision an old, beloved raceway in northern Portland. The project was very complex in that the site is located in a flood plane, so we spent many weeks of the term working to develop landscape plans.

The driving goal that led to my design was to connect the various pieces that go into a racetrack, as well as the new programmatic elements such as an E.V. testing facility and small wetland research facility. This connection was formed through the concept of movement. The movement of visitors, racecars, and floodwater alike is a constant cycle on the site, tying into the changes and evolution of racing over time. These ideas from the site were then carried to a smaller scale to Schematic Design of the flexible E.V. testing facility.

02

Mas

ter P

lann

ing

Adjunct Faculty Juli Brode | Upper-Level Studio | Spring 2013

Scope: Visioning, Master Planning (50+ years), Landscape Design, Wetland Research, Building Schematic Design, Envelope Detailing

Size: 500 Acres (Master Plan); 8,180 sq. ft. (E.V. Testing Facility)

Portland International

Raceway

Page 13: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 14: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 15: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Final Presentation Rendering

Page 16: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Conceptual Process Models

Page 17: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Promenade Physical ModelPromenade Physical Models

Page 18: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

E.V. Testing Center Interior Perspective

Garage Organization & Safety Zoning

Page 19: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

E.V. Testing Center Section Model

Page 20: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

This old flour mill site is a real project of the Portland Development Commission, who we had the chance to work with throughout the design process. Our goals were to revision the site and think about the edges of the river, train tracks, Field’s Park, and the Pearl District. My partner and I chose to engage each of these elements and focus on the transitions between spaces. We were also encouraged to save much of the older buildings while adding new pieces where the program required. We did this by saving the structure of some older buildings while adding new pieces to juxtapose the existing and highlight one another.

We then took our concept of ‘new breaking out of the old’ to a building scale; we developed the visitor center by using pieces of the existing and iconic warehouse on the river’s edge such as its structure and roof.

03

His

toric

al R

euse

Professor Ihab Elzeyadi | Upper-Level Studio | Summer 2013

Design Partner: Gina Auduong

Scope: Master Planning, Reuse and Restoration, Landscape Design, City Transit Research, Building Schematic Design

Size: 2 City Blocks (Master Plan); 20,000 sq. ft. (Visitors Center)

Centennial M

ills

Redevelopm

ent

Page 21: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 22: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

1.

2.3.4. 4.

5.

6. 7.8.

9.

10.

10.

11.

Willamette River

NW Naito Parkway

9th Ave.

Amtrak Railroad

Fields Park

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

A

10. Pedestrian Tunnel11. Pedestrian Bridge12. Event Expansion Space13. Organic Park Space14. Second Story Boardwalk15. Reflection Pool 16. Formal River Connection17. Underground Parking Entry

1. Main Plaza2. Retail3. Apartment Housing4. Workspace5. Visitor Center6. Transitional Ruin Garden7. Greenway8. Arts & Culture Gallery9. Restaurant/Event Space

Page 23: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Site Section

Hierarchy of Spaces

Access to Water Edge

Formal vs. Organic

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

eerr

Activated Green Spaces

Fiel

ds P

ark

PPaa

Greenway

City

Stre

et

Site AccessOpen Spaces

Hierarchy of Spaces

Access to Water Edge

Formal vs. Organic

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

eerr

Activated Green Spaces

Fiel

ds P

ark

PPaa

Greenway

City

Stre

et

Site AccessOpen Spaces

Hierarchy of Spaces

Access to Water Edge

Formal vs. Organic

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

eerr

Activated Green Spaces

Fiel

ds P

ark

PPaa

Greenway

City

Stre

et

Site AccessOpen Spaces

Hierarchy of Spaces

Access to Water Edge

Formal vs. Organic

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

eerr

Activated Green Spaces

Fiel

ds P

ark

PPaa

Greenway

City

Stre

et

Site AccessOpen Spaces

Hierarchy of Spaces

Access to Water Edge

Formal vs. Organic

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

eerr

Activated Green Spaces

Fiel

ds P

ark

PPaa

Greenway

City

Stre

et

Site AccessOpen Spaces

Hierarchy of Spaces

Access to Water Edge

Formal vs. Organic

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

Ope

n Co

rrid

or

eerr

Activated Green Spaces

Fiel

ds P

ark

PPaa

Greenway

City

Stre

et

Site AccessOpen Spaces

Diagramming the Site

Page 24: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

1. Human Interaction

2. ShiftingComposition

3. New Reactions(each time)

ProgrammaticSpacing

CentralCirculation

Main Access

Visitors Center Conceptual Diagrams & Model

1. Human Interaction

2. ShiftingComposition

3. New Reactions(each time)

ProgrammaticSpacing

CentralCirculation

Main Access

1. Human Interaction

2. ShiftingComposition

3. New Reactions(each time)

ProgrammaticSpacing

CentralCirculation

Main Access

1. Human Interaction

2. ShiftingComposition

3. New Reactions(each time)

ProgrammaticSpacing

CentralCirculation

Main Access

Page 25: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Glass Skylight

Existing Warehouse Roof

Expose Existing Structure

Exhibit Mezzanine Space

Glass Enclosures

Openings allow Cross Ventilation

Existing Warehouse

Concrete Slab

View to River

Glass Skylight

Existing Warehouse Roof

Expose Existing Structure

Exhibit Mezzanine Space

Glass Enclosures

Openings allow Cross Ventilation

Existing Warehouse

Concrete Slab

View to River

Glass Skylight

Existing Warehouse Roof

Expose Existing Structure

Exhibit Mezzanine Space

Glass Enclosures

Openings allow Cross Ventilation

Existing Warehouse

Concrete Slab

View to River

Visitors Center Ground Floor

Visitors Center Mezzanine

Page 26: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Architectural Context Analysis of Pearl District

Page 27: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Final Presentation Rendering

Page 28: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

OregonBILDS is the first Design + Build student program of its kind in Oregon. The money made by selling the house will support the next year’s design and budget. Because of this, we were very concerned with staying within budget, constructability (as students will be the laborers), and marketability (we had a profiled user group and needed to make a profit).

We designed an affordable house for a large extended family that can expand easily. We focused on getting the drawing set ready for permits and met with consultants. As a group studio, much was gained from the organization of dividing work and communication.

04

Res

iden

tial D

esig

n +

Bui

ld

OregonBILDS | Design + Build Group Studio | Fall 2013

Scope: Site Design, City Codes, Budgeting, Construction & Permit Set Drawings, Landscape Design, Building Schematic Design, Detail Design, Construction

Size: 1,280 sq. ft. Construction Began: Jan. 2014 | Goal to Sell: July 2014Project Budget: $100,000

The Hope Loop House

Page 29: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Rendering by Classmate, Cameron Huber

Page 30: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 31: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Typical Foundation Detail

Eave Detail

Garage Ledger Detail

Currently Under Construction

Page 32: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Staircase PerspectiveGuardrail Section

For the final presentation, I pursued my interest in the heart of the house, the staircase. This exploration included materials, bookshelf, handrail, and guardrails.

Page 33: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Elevation View from KitchenFull-Scale

Guardrail Model

Page 34: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

This project was an in-depth look at modular systems of struc-ture. We focused on materiality, joinery, and form (both at the scale of the module and the overall shelter). Our design was inspired by the strength, elegance, and complexity of a möbius strip. My partner and I repeatedly tested different materials and base angles to find the strongest solution for the overall shape of each strip.

Our structure’s stability was formed by the bending stiffness of the strips, but when the plastic was divided (since they had to be transported to Paris for our final presentation), their bending stiffness was decreased. This did not align with our hypothesis and caused the need for a cushioning material between the plastic strips that could transfer shear forces down to the base. This allowed our full-scale model to be strong enough to hold its own weight, as seen to the right.

05

Engi

neer

ed M

odul

ar S

yste

ms

Study Abroad: Universität Stuttgart | Taught in German Fall-Winter 2013 | Upper Level Tech Studio

Design Partner: Stefan Scheffler

Scope: Global shell-like concept, local double-curved modular systems, joinery, full-scale mockup planning & construction

Paris Metro Shelter

Page 35: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 36: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Front View

Page 37: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Footing Detail Drawings

Section

Process/Testing Models

Page 38: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

The Eugene YMCA is looking to expand in phases on their existing site. Because of this and the local zoning, there was a strict pull to build the main building on the south half of the site. The YMCA tennis courts are some of the only indoor courts in the city and are extremely valued, so finding space for them became a priority. We worked with the clients and presented schemes to them throughout the process.

As the program of this project dictates much of what and how to design, I organized the main spaces around a barbell-shaped circulation zone. Safety being a large concern from the clients, I focused on breaking up the mass and allowing views through the entire site so as to employ ‘eyes on the street.’

06

Rec

reat

ion

Des

ign

Instructor Megan Haight | Third-Year Studio | Summer 2013

Scope: Site Planning, Programming, Client Interaction, Building Codes Research, Building Schematic Design

Size: 2 City BlocksMinimum 125 Parking Spaces

Eugene YMCA

Page 39: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 40: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Natatorium

Wellness Center

Wellness

Gym

SmallLounge

Racquetball

Men’s Women’s

Lau

nd

ry

Sto

r.

Sau

na

Stea

m

FL

FL

FL

Off

.

Child Watch

Outdoor Play

Café

Lobby

Storage

FrontStaff

Admin.

Office

Storage

Mech.

Elec.

ExerciseStudio

Multi-purposeRoom

YogaStudio

OutdoorRoof

Garden

BoardRoom

Admin.

Observation

Walking Circut

Skybridge

Off.

Gat

her

/O

bse

rv

atio

n

Tennis

2’ Subgrade Parking(126 Spaces)

Natatorium

Wellness Center

Wellness

Gym

SmallLounge

Racquetball

Men’s Women’s

Lau

nd

ry

Sto

r.

Sau

na

Stea

m

FL

FL

FL

Off

.

Child Watch

Outdoor Play

Café

Lobby

Storage

FrontStaff

Admin.

Office

Storage

Mech.

Elec.

ExerciseStudio

Multi-purposeRoom

YogaStudio

OutdoorRoof

Garden

BoardRoom

Admin.

Observation

Walking Circut

Skybridge

Off.

Gat

her

/O

bse

rv

atio

n

Tennis

2’ Subgrade Parking(126 Spaces)

Page 41: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Natatorium

Wellness Center

Wellness

Gym

SmallLounge

Racquetball

Men’s Women’sLa

un

dr

y

Sto

r.

Sau

na

Stea

mFL

FL

FL

Off

.

Child Watch

Outdoor Play

Café

Lobby

Storage

FrontStaff

Admin.

Office

Storage

Mech.

Elec.

ExerciseStudio

Multi-purposeRoom

YogaStudio

OutdoorRoof

Garden

BoardRoom

Admin.

Observation

Walking Circut

Skybridge

Off.

Gat

her

/O

bse

rv

atio

n

Tennis

2’ Subgrade Parking(126 Spaces)

Second Floor Plan

Ground Floor Plan

Natatorium

Wellness Center

Wellness

Gym

SmallLounge

Racquetball

Men’s Women’sLa

un

dr

y

Sto

r.

Sau

na

Stea

mFL

FL

FL

Off

.

Child Watch

Outdoor Play

Café

Lobby

Storage

FrontStaff

Admin.

Office

Storage

Mech.

Elec.

ExerciseStudio

Multi-purposeRoom

YogaStudio

OutdoorRoof

Garden

BoardRoom

Admin.

Observation

Walking Circut

Skybridge

Off.

Gat

her

/O

bse

rv

atio

n

Tennis

2’ Subgrade Parking(126 Spaces)

Page 42: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Tennis Court Section

Entry to Natatorium Section

Page 43: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Entry Courtyard Vignette

Page 44: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

This project was located on an old orchard site that is used now as a public park and living history site. It is often used for events, so the task was to design an events center anywhere on the site. My events center lies atop a gentle hill that overlooks some of the only open space on the property and is bordered by orchards. It is visible from the entrance of the site and the curvilinear spine of my building reaches out towards the entry to greet visitors and then guides them through the building and back out to the open space.

I organized the building in that one would pass through the spine several times, but always be grounded by that constant presence. The services are located in the back, while the larger events space looks out towards the orchards, open space, and butte in the distance. The roof structures of the front and back pieces differ to help illustrate this differentiation.

07

Even

t & S

ite R

espo

nse

Assistant Professor Mark Donofrio | Second-Year Studio | Fall 2011

Scope: Site Planning, Building Schematic Design, Construction Details

Size: 4,800 sq. ft.

Dorris Ranch

Events Center

Page 45: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 46: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Concept Models

Page 47: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Concept Models

East Elevation

Perspective Along Spine

Page 48: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

08

CAD

& H

and

Det

ail D

raw

ings

Building Enclosures | Fifth-Year Course | Fall 2013

Topics Covered: -Enclosure Systems & Climate -Enclosure Barriers -Roof Membranes & Cladding -Building Materials: +Masonry & Terra Cotta +Glass & Glazing Systems +Wood +Concrete +Stone +Metals

Straub Hall Remodel

Canopy Detail

Page 49: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Parapet Detail Layered Structural System

Page 50: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

09

An U

p-C

ycle

d Ex

plor

atio

n

Environmental Control Systems 1 | Second-Year Course | Winter 2012

Project Groupmates: Rachael Hudson, Spencer Roedel, Jenelle Barzola

Recycled Trombe W

all

In theory, this up-cycled cob wall acts similar to a traditional mass-and-glass assembly for a trombe wall. The only difference is that the air cavity is divided into smaller portions, held within the glass bottles.

Purpose: to compare a standard cob wall’s heat capacity to that of an up-cycled wall assembly of cob and recycled bottles.

Hypothesis: the recycled glass bottles will absorb the sun’s heat, and then transfer the heat to the thermal mass of the cob. Indirect gain from the suns rays then radiates the heat after there is no longer exposure to sunlight.

Stomping the Cob!

Methodology:

Page 51: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Stomping the Cob! Recycled Bottles During Curing Process

Results: the empty bottle assembly performed better than the plain cob in regards to maximum temperature reached. The water-filled assembly, on the other hand, retained its heat for longer than the two other assemblies.

Page 52: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

10

Mus

ic S

choo

l Int

erio

r Red

esig

n

Environmental Control Systems 2 | Second-Year Course | Spring 2012

Project Groupmates: Arnold Toriumi, David Cho, Lena Traudt

Luminaire

Final Rendering

Page 53: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Lighting Quality

Luminaire Plan & Section

Page 54: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

10

Personal Projects

1. Board Game(Hand-cut pieces, Laser-cut images, Woodburning, Cards)

2. Angel in Tree(Pen & Ink)

3. Abstract(Graphite)

4. Symmography(Yarn Art)

1Wal

l Art,

Gifts

, Han

d M

edia

5. Pattern Exploration(Pen & Ink, Colored Pencil)

6. Mural(Construction Paper)

7. Wedding Gift (Box & Original wine label)

Page 55: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

3

2

4

5

6

7

Page 56: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

11

Photography

Trav

els,

Pat

tern

s, L

ight

1. Church on a Hill(Stykkishólmer, Iceland)

2. Lines of Moss(Flatey, Iceland)

3. Heated Landscape(Iceland)

4. Under the Bridge(Florence, OR)

5. Framed Path(Budapest, Hungary)

6. Shadow of Three(Stuttgart, Germany)

7. Cover Photograph: Colored Landscape(Ireland)

1

Page 57: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

2

3

4

Page 58: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

65

Page 59: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Claire Seger

Practicum StudentRobertson Sherwood Architects (Eugene, OR)

Drawing with SketchUp & AutoCAD, Joining site visits, Formatting proposals & charts, Tracking & marking drawing changes, Advising interior material palettes, Designing presentation boards, Meeting with consultants

Design assistance for new 121-foot schooner sailboat, Conducting naval architecture research & analysis under UO Professor, Producing AutoCAD construction documents, Creating Rhinoceros 3D model

Leading research & design of rainwater catchment system, Coordinating on-site construction & organization, Preparing construction drawings

Visiting construction sites, Executing secretarial & communication bookkeeping, Assisting in performing individual project tasks, Tracking redline corrections

Teaching AssistantUniversity of Oregon First Year Studio

Assisting students with design principles, Teaching drawing, Physical modeling, & representational skills, Introducing the connection between concept & actuality

AutoCAD DrafterNaval Architecture S.A.L.T.S. Project

Research & Design LeadCenter for the Advancement of Sustainable Living

Summer InternStraightline Design, Inc. (Omaha, NE)

Office TraineeAlley Poyner Macchietto Architecture (Omaha, NE)

Meeting with clients, Drafting with AutoCAD, Advising design decisions, Analyzing site conditions

Telephone: (402) 651-6493

E-mail: [email protected]

Online Portfolio: http://segerclaire.wix.com/portfolio

Fall 2010-Fall 2012

April 2013-Today

January 2014-Today

Summer 2013

Summer 2011

Summer 2010

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCEUniversity of OregonEugene, OR

Bachelors of ArchitectureMinors: German, Art History, Business Administration

EDUCATION

Universität StuttgartStuttgart, Germany

Study Abroad 2012-2013Focus of Study: Architecture (Seminar & Design), German Language & CultureAll courses taught in German

RELEVANT SKILLSAutoCAD & RevitRhinoceros & GrasshopperAdobe (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign)SketchUpV-RAY & Artlantis Rendering SoftwareMicrosoft Office (Word, Excel, Powerpoint)Construction DrawingsHand Drafting & Physical ModelingWoodshop/WoodworkingPhotographyMac & Windows OS

REFERENCESAssociate Professor Dr. Mark Gillem [email protected] Professor Mark Donofrio [email protected] Faculty Juli Brode [email protected]

LEED Green Associate | Student Member ASHRAE | Student Member AIAS

Page 60: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2

Thank You.

Page 61: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2
Page 62: C.Seger Portfolio Vol.2