cspp
DESCRIPTION
6.12.11. CSPP. THINKING COMPARATIVELY MACRO AND MICRO DIMENSIONS IN THE POLITICS OF AUSTERITY PROFESSOR RICHARD ROSE FBA Director, Centre for the Study of Public Policy PSA Greek Politics Specialist Group THE POLITICS OF EXTREME AUSTERITY: GREECE BEYOND THE CRISIS - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CSPP
THINKING COMPARATIVELY
MACRO AND MICRO DIMENSIONS IN THE POLITICS OF AUSTERITY
PROFESSOR RICHARD ROSE FBA
Director, Centre for the Study of Public Policy
PSA Greek Politics Specialist Group
THE POLITICS OF EXTREME AUSTERITY: GREECE BEYOND THE CRISIS
University of Strathclyde
8th December 2011
6.12.11
6.12.11
WHERE IS THE CRISIS?
Top down macro-economic or bottom-up household?
Vulnerable countriesAn international stimulus: all countries equally affected
Macro-economic: a crisis of banks, ministries of finance
But vulnerability differs with national economic policies
Vulnerable peopleMicro-level: poor people, indebted people.
All countries have some vulnerable and some secure people but proportions differ.
Source: Richard Rose, “Micro-economic Responses to a Macro-economic Crisis: a Pan-European Perspective”, Jl of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 27, 3-4, (2011) 264-384.
2
6.12.11
23
4449
56
77
86
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Northern Mediterranean CEE
Household economy National economy
NATIONAL CRISIS WORSE THAN HOUSEHOLD CRISIS
Q. How would you judge the current situation in each of the following? The financial situation of your household. The situation of the national economy? (4 point scale: very good, good, bad, very bad)
(% saying situation bad or very bad)
Source: Eurobarometer 72.4, A2a.1, A2a.5 (October-November 2009), 27 EU countries, unweighted N=26,830.
%
3
EUROPEANS DIFFER IN VULNERABILITY
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Unemployed
Anxious job loss
Pensioner
Tertiary education
Rural resident
Has mortgage
Credit card
Employed
Has attribute Does not
Percent adult population
49%
40%
28%
27%
27%
23%
10%
8%
Source: Eurobarometer 72.1, fieldwork August-September 2009. Nationwide samples of 27 EU member states. National responses weighted equally for pooled analysis. Number of unweighted respondents, 25,812.
6.12.114
6.12.11
OCCASIONAL PROBLEMS BUT MOST COPING
No difficulty41%
Okay, occasional problems
35%A constant struggle
18%
Falling behinda bit 4%
Behind with many bills 2%
Source: Pooled survey EuroBaromeer 2009
Q. Which of the following best describes how your household is keeping up with all its bills and credit commitments at the moment?
5
6.12.11
DIFFERENCES IN COPING BY COUNTRY
Q 37. Which of the following best describes how your household is keeping up with all its bills and credit commitments at the moment?
North Med. CEE Difference North-CEE
(% respondents) No difficulty 58 25 33 25 Okay but problems 30 38 38 -8 from time to time Keeping up a 9 30 21 -12 constant struggleKeeping up (97) (93) (92) (5)
Falling behind with 2 5 6 -4 some bills Real problems, be- 1 2 3 -2 hind with many bills Falling behind (3) (7) (9) (-6)
Source: Eurobarometer 72.1, Q37, 27 EU countries, fieldwork August-September 2009, unweighted N=26,719. Don’t knows excluded.
6
WHO IS HARDEST HIT WHERE?
♦People who were worse off before the crisis, e.g. less educated, lower social class.
♦People who live in EU countries with low GDP.
♦Pensioners more secure than educated. employed .
6.12.117
DO GREEKS DIFFER IN THEIR REACTION TO AUSTERITY?
Can only show Greece is different if we specify:
♦Which countries it differs from? Cyprus, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Latvia? UK?
♦ How is Greece different? Cause of problems, response or both?
6.12.118
POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS FOR GREEK DIFFERENCES
♦Austerity measures worse? Not by standards of Ireland
♦Less economically literate? Can't understand an end to free lunch
♦More Socialist? But many farmers, self employed
♦More anti-European?
6.12.119
AN EGREGIOUS GREECE REQUIRES A HOMOGENEOUS EU
♦Every EU country divided in its response to cuts
♦United in dislike of banks and bankers
♦26 country opposition to unconditionally transferring funds to Greece
-0-
6.12.1110