csu bat results. results 1. cal poly mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. san diego mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. sonoma...

22
CSU BAT Results

Upload: gwendolyn-stevens

Post on 18-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

CSU BAT Results

Page 2: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

Results

1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2

2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8

3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0

4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7

5. Long Beach Mean = 39.8 ± 0.9

6. San Jose Mean = 39.4 ± 0.6

7. San Francisco Mean = 39.0 ± 1.1

8. Stanislaus Mean = 38.8 ± 2.0

9. Fresno Mean = 38.6 ± 1.0

10. Bakersfield = 38.5 ± 2.8

11. Dominguez Hills Mean = 38.2 ± 1.0

12. Chico Mean = 37.6 ± 1.1

13. Northridge Mean = 37.6 ± 0.9

Practical significance

Statistically significant

(p<.001)

Page 3: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

Results

Page 4: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

Results

BSBA Program Assessment By CSU Campus

46.37

41.26 40.53 39.90 39.85 39.43 38.99 38.81 38.65 38.47 38.22 37.59 37.57

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Cal PolySLO N=76

San DiegoState N=302

SonomaState N=140

CSUSacramento

N=337

CSU LongBeach N=198

San JoseState N=439

SanFrancisco

State N=152

CSUStanislaus

N=53

CSU FresnoN=213

CSUBakersfield

N=36

CSUDominguezHills N=139

CSU Chico N=162

CSUNorthridge

N=200

Mea

n S

co

re

Overall BAT Mean Score: 39.57

Page 5: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU CSU BAT Results

Page 6: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Gender

Female Mean = 39.0 ± 0.8

Male Mean= 40.0 ± 0.8

NOT practically significant

NOT statistically significant

(p=.16)

Page 7: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Age

20 to 25 Mean = 39.0 ± 0.7

26 to 30 Mean = 41.8 ± 1.5

31 to 35 Mean = 43.3 ± 3.5

36 to 40 Mean = 38.1 ± 6.3

Above 40 Mean = 40.6 ± 4.3

Borderline practical significance

Statistically significant

(p=.018)

Page 8: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results – Gender and AgeScores by Gender/Age (Overall)

39.040.0

39.0

41.843.3

38.1

40.6

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Females(N=211)

Males(N=218)

20-25 (N=332)

26-30 (N=63)

31-35 (N=15)

36-40 (N=7)

Over 40 (N=7)

Mea

n S

core

Page 9: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results – Enrollment

Full Time Mean= 39.4 ± 0.6

Part Time Mean = 39.8 ± 1.2

NOT practically significant

NOT statistically significant

(p=.63)

Page 10: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Work Hours per Week

0 to 10 Mean= 40.7 ± 1.3

11 to 20 Mean = 40.4 ± 1.3

21 to 30 Mean = 38.4 ± 1.1

31 to 40 Mean = 38.8 ± 1.3

Over 40 Mean = 39.2 ± 2.1

NOT practically significant

NOT statistically significant

(p=.130)

Page 11: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results – Enrollment and Work Hours

Score by Enrollment & Work Hours

39.4 39.840.7 40.4

38.4 38.8 39.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Full TimeN=361

Part Time N=72

0 to10 hrs/wk N=110

11 to 20 hrs/wkN=91

21 to 30 hrs/wkN=120

31 to 40 hrs/wkN=74

> 40 hrs/wkN=33

Mea

n S

core

Page 12: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results – Language

Communicate best in English Mean= 39.7 ± 0.7

Communicate better in another language Mean = 39.5 ± 2.3

Communicate equally well in English and another language Mean = 38.0 ± 1.6

NOT practically significant

NOT statistically significant (p=.254)

Page 13: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Transfer Status

Not Transfer Mean= 38.9 ± 0.9

Transfer Mean = 39.9 ± 0.8

NOT practically significant

NOT statistically significant

(p=.166)

Page 14: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results – Language and Transfer Status

Score by Language and Transfer Status

39.7 39.538.0

39.938.9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Communicate best inEnglish N=339

Communicate best inanother language

N=31

Communicate equallywell in English andanother language

N=65

Transfer student N=223

Not transfer studentN=208

Mea

n S

core

Page 15: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - EthnicityAsian/Asian American Mean = 38.4 ± 0.8

Black or African American Mean = 39.0 ± 4.5

Mexican-American, Latin-American, other Hispanic Mean = 37.8 ± 1.6

Middle Eastern Mean = 36.5 ± 1.9

Native American Mean = 43.0 ± ?

White Mean = 42.9 ± 1.4

Other Mean = 40.1 ± 2.6

Decline to Specify Mean = 39.3 ± 2.9

Practical significance

Statistically significant

(p<.001)

Page 16: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - EthnicityScore by Ethnicity

38.4 39.037.8

36.5

43.0 42.9

40.139.3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Asian/AsianAmerican

N=216

Black/AfricanAmerican N=7

MexicanAmerican, LatinAmerican, otherHispanic N=44

Middle EasternN=10

Native AmericanN=1

White N=94 Other N=28 Decline tospecify N=16

Mea

n S

core

Page 17: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - OptionAAIS Mean = 42.3 ± 1.7 (Acc./Acc. Inf. Systems)

Other Mean = 46.8 ± 6.4

FLRE Mean = 40.0 ± 1.3 (Finance/Law/Real Estate )

HRM Mean = 37.9 ± 2.9 (Human Resources Management)

ISITEB Mean = 38.7 ± 1.6 (Inf. Systems/Inf. Tech/E-Business)

IGB Mean = 40.1 ± 3.8 (International/Global Business)

Mang Mean = 38.4 ± 1.3 (Management)

Mark Mean = 38.7 ± 1.1 (Marketing)

Borderline practical significance

Statistically significant

(p=.025)

Page 18: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Transfer vs. Not Transfer for Acc./Acc. Inf. Systems Option

Not Transfer Mean= 44.0 ± 3.7

Transfer Mean = 41.5 ± 2.0

Borderline practical significance

NOT statistically significant

(p=.296)

Page 19: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Transfer vs. Not Transfer for Finance/Law/Real Estate Option

Not Transfer Mean= 39.3 ± 2.8

Transfer Mean = 40.5 ± 2.0

NOT practically significant

NOT statistically significant

(p=.547)

Page 20: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Transfer vs. Not Transfer for Inf. Systems/Inf. Tech/E-Business Option

Not Transfer Mean= 37.4 ± 2.1

Transfer Mean = 41.0 ± 2.4

Borderline practical significance

Borderline statistical significance

(p=.055)

Page 21: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Transfer vs. Not Transfer for Management Option

Not Transfer Mean= 39.8 ± 2.2

Transfer Mean = 37.5 ± 1.7

NOT practically significant

NOT statistically significant

(p=.172)

Page 22: CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± 1.2 2. San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± 0.8 3. Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± 1.0 4. Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± 0.7 5. Long

SJSU Results - Transfer vs. Not Transfer for Management Option

Not Transfer Mean= 37.8 ± 1.4

Transfer Mean = 40.1 ± 1.8

Borderline practical significance

Borderline statistical significance

(p=.084)