ct radiation risks and dose reduction - keystone physics...2. discussion of non-radiation...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Walter L. Robinson, M.S.D.A.B.S.N.M., D.A.B.M.P.,
D.A.B.R.
Consultant Certified Medical Radiation Health & Diagnostic Imaging Physicist
CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction
![Page 2: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1. History2. Basic dosimetry3. Biology of radiation effects4. Unique issues with radiation in children5. Optimization of risk/benefit ratio6. Use appropriate techniques7. Joint efforts with healthcare providers
Medical Radiation and Children
![Page 3: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“ The radiologist must beintroduced to the special
techniques required to handle infants and children, and must have experience in their use.”
![Page 4: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Side effects were reported within 3 months of discovery
Radiology…tremendous benefits, but also risks or side effects…
![Page 7: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2. Basic dosimetry
• Dose units• Measures of dose• Conversions
![Page 10: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Factors Affecting Patient Dose From C.T.1. kVp - If mAs is constant, increasing kVp will increase dose2. mAs - mAs is directly and linearly proportional to dose3. Slice Width – dose can be reduced by increasing slice width;
although SNR is improved, axial resolution/detail is reduced4. Matrix Size and FOV – an increase in these results in improved
contrast and spatial resolution, at the expense of dose5. Window and Level – a narrower window enhances contrast resolution6. Radius of Rotation – short diameter (mobile CT) provides higher
patient dose7. Bowtie Absorber – the use of a bowtie absorber with helical CT
reduces dose through filtration of softer X-rays8. Helical Pitch – changing the pitch to a higher number reduces dose9. Beam Width = # detectors x detector thickness affects; the greater
the beam width, the more efficient the collection of X-rays, and lower the dose.
10. Use multi-planar reconstruction. Helical slice thickness can be chosen after acquisition.
![Page 11: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Applying this Knowledge
For instance: acquire 5.0 mm slices with no overlap with a helical pitch of 1.2. Reconstruct 5.0 mm slices with 3.0 mm increments to fill the gaps. This improves noise with some resolution loss. With a lowering of mAs to reduce effective dose, this is a helpful tip to improve the quality of the image.
![Page 12: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Helical or spiral scanning slice pattern
![Page 13: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Many different measures of dose in medical imaging: e.g.
• Exit dose• Dose (or KERMA) area product (DAP) • Entrance skin exposure (R)• Organ dose (RAD or mGy)• Dose equivalent (REM or mSv)• Effective dose (REM or mSv)• Dose computed from a phantom (e.g. CTDI,
MSAD, DLP, etc.)
![Page 15: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Radiation Dose: measures for risk assessment
• Absorbed Dose (Gray – Gy)– For an individual tissue or organ– Difficult to measure; not practical
• Effective Dose Equivalent (Sievert – Sv)– Nonuniform exposure to organ or region– Expression of risk equivalent to whole body exposure
Not “Scanner” Dose Units (mGy)– CTDIvol and DLP: phantom determination– Not helpful in assigning risk without conversion!!
![Page 16: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CTDI – CT Dose Index• On scanner consoles• Based on phantom (16 or 32 cm diameter)• Only represents the dose to the phantom
based on CT parameters selected• Does not indicate dose to the child in the CT
scanner• Conversions of CTDI to effective dose are
only rough estimations for children– e.g. no age based chest modifications
![Page 17: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
C.T. Radiation Absorbed Dose Descriptors
CTDI - Computed Tomography Dose Index – the dose to the central axis point in a single sliceCTDI I - (i = # slices) – so the CTDI 100 = single slice dose in the center of the body in the center of 100 mm CTDI w - (w = weighted) = 2/3 surface (1 cm.) x 1/3 centerCTDI v = CTDI w if pitch is 1.0 = 1.0 RAD. If pitch is 0.9 = 1.1 RAD. If pitch is 1.1 = 0.9 RAD.
If the single slice dose is 1.0 RAD, then the center of 14 slices can be 1.5 to 2.0 RAD, from scattered dose from adjacent slice dose contributions.
![Page 18: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
C.T. Dose Descriptors Cont’d
DLP = Dose Length Product is the bridge from CTDI to Effective Dose. CTDI v x scan length (slice width x # slices) = DLP in mGy-cmEffective Dose Equivalent (EDE) or Effective Dose = the whole body dose equivalent from a dose to a portion of the body
EDE = Sum of the weighting factors for various organ or tissues compartments x maximum dose to a given organ or tissue compartment (as of 2007 there are 15 compartments)
Bone marrow, breast, colon, lung, and stomach are each 12%; gonads are 8%; bladder, thyroid, liver, and esophagus are 4% each; brain, bone surface, salivary glands, and skin are 1% each, with the remainder 12%.
![Page 19: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
For Instance
RADS EDEPA Chest…………...... 0.02 ………………………0.02 REM
C.T. Head………………7.5 ……………………….0.2 REM
C.T. Abd………………..2.5 ……………………….1.0 REM
C.T. Ped. Abd………….2.0 ……………………….3.0 REM
Annual Background Radiation……………………0.3 REM
Radiation Risk for Children is 3 times that of the Adult
![Page 20: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Effective Dose
• It is a radiation dose quantity • It is a computation based on:
Organ dose and radiosensitivityWeighting factors
![Page 21: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Biological Effects of Radiation Learned from the Past:
• Deterministic effects• Stochastic effects
![Page 22: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
There are Two Types of Bio Effects
Dose dependent: –severity depends on dose–there is a threshold–burns, hair loss
This is a deterministic effect
![Page 23: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Deterministic Effects
![Page 25: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
There are Two Types of Bio Effects
Non dose dependent: – severity is independent of dose– risk of event occurring is dependent
on dose– there is “no threshold”– cancer, genetic mutations
This is a stochastic effect
![Page 28: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Biological effects of radiation damage to DNA
• Reactions are rapid • Induction of cancer takes many years• The damage to DNA may lead to
genomic instability
![Page 29: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
4. Unique issues with radiation in children• Plain film history
– Scoliosis• Therapy
– Tinea capitis– Thymus
• Low dose effect and cancer– Atomic bomb survivors– Brenner
![Page 30: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
… 96 minutes of x rays
![Page 31: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Typical Radiation Doses(mSv)
• Average annual technician dose 3.2• Natural background 3.5• Dental x-rays .09• BE (marrow) 8.75• CXR (marrow) .01• Mammogram (breast) .5 - 7.0• Airline passenger .03• Flight crew / attendants 1.6• CT < 1.0 – 30 mSv
![Page 32: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Typical Medical Radiation Doses: 5 year-old
(mSv*)• 3-view ankle .0015 • 2-view chest .02 • Tc-99m radionuclide gastric emptying .06 • Tc-99m radionuclide cystogram .18 • Tc-99m radionuclide bone scan up to 6.2• FDG PET 15.3• Fluoroscopic cystogram <.33• Chest CT up to 3 • Abdomen CT up to 5
CXREquivalents
1/14th
139
31076516150250
* This is effective dose; organ doses (in mGy) will differ
![Page 33: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
One PET CT in a 5 yr old…
• 23.3 mSv• 1165 chest x rays, or…..• 7.5 years of background
radiation
![Page 34: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
AJR Feb 2001
![Page 35: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
AJR February 2001
![Page 36: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Fatal Cancer Risk
• Estimated • Debated• May be zero• May be, in children, 1 in 500 - 1,000
risk* from a single CT
* Risk is of fatal cancer!!
![Page 38: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
• NCRP• ICRP• BEIR• NCI• FDA• ACR, AAPM, etc.
Is Low-level Ionizing Radiation Harmful? Support:
![Page 39: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Brenner et al, 2003*“Above doses of 50-100 mSv
(protracted exposure) or 10-50 mSv (acute exposure), direct
epidemiologic evidence from human populations demonstrate the exposure to ionizing radiation
increases the risk of some cancer.”
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2235592100
![Page 40: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Conclusions from BEIR VII (2005) include:
“…the risk of cancer proceeds in a linear fashion at lower doses
without a threshold and … the smallest dose has the potential to
cause a small increase risk to humans.”
![Page 41: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
“It should be noted, however, that the inability to detect increased [cancer] risks at very low doses
does not mean that those increases do not exist.”
UNSCEAR 2000
![Page 42: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Pierce, Preston, Rad Res 151 pg 178-186: 2000
Brenner Pediatric Radiology Apr 2002 pg 230
![Page 43: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Sensitivity of children to radiation
Digital uncoupling of final product and dose
Radiation sensitivity inversely with age
Adult risk is 5%/Sv; children is 16%/Sv, or three times higher.
![Page 45: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
• Tissues are more radiosensitive• Longer lifetime to manifest
radiation-induced injury (cancer, cataracts)
• Each exam (therefore dose) is cumulative – depending upon where the dose is delivered
Radiation Risks in Children:No Debate
![Page 46: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Effective Dose Equivalent (EDE)
Equal exposure:Child EDE > adult EDE
![Page 47: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Huda et al Radiology 203: 1997 pg 421
![Page 48: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Risk vs. Benefits
Let us never forget, that a properly prescribed diagnostic test utilizing C.T. for children has its benefits. Benefits that most of the time far exceed the risk. The risk, after all is to the increased possibility of a cancer in 10-30 years vs. the effective management of the patient’s current condition.
![Page 49: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
6. Optimization of benefit/risk ratio
• Appropriate to do exam• Appropriate timing of exam• Appropriate modality• Get clinician/radiologist together• Technologist• CT diagnosis should not be delayed
due to fear of radiation
![Page 50: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
To improve Benefit/Risk Ratio
1. Prudent patient selection –especially children2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially
abdomen/pelvis, C.T. fluoro, and conventional fluoro4. Educate and credential referring physicians, E.R.
physicians, and radiologists to the relative risks of medical radiation, especially C.T. and Fluoro
5. Develop CT techniques with medical physicist, CT technologist, and Service representatives to develop low dose techniques while optimizing quality. Enlighten CT techs to newer equipment pediatric techniques-built in
6. Strive for ACR and “Image Gently” recommended published diagnostic radiation levels (DRLs or RRLs)
![Page 51: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Prudent Patient Selection
What is considered prudent?
When you feel you can achieve a 95% assureity of a diagnosis that produces the outcome of life over death.
![Page 52: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
![Page 53: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
![Page 54: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
References for Unnecessary High CT Doses
• Pediatric Radiology 2005 35:555-564 (musculoskeletal)
• AJR 2004 183:809-816 (chest)• AJR 2003 181:939-944 (sinus)• AJR 2002 179:461-465 (chest)• AJR 2002 179:1101-1106 (abdomen)• AJR 2002 179:1107-1113 (abdomen)• Pediatric Radiology 1999 29:770-775
(brain)
![Page 55: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
How Do We Respond?
• Pediatrician or E.D. Physicians’ responsibility:
Be sure the test is necessaryUse the least invasive modality which gives a high certainty of successDiscuss case with radiologist when unsure
![Page 56: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Physician’s responsibility:
Understand radiation doses of modalitiesOrder on medical indications not parental/legal pressureDiscuss options with radiologist Consider information for parents
How Do We Respond?
![Page 57: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
![Page 58: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
• Radiologists’ responsibilityUnderstand radiation dosesReview requests for higher dose studiesDiscuss with cliniciansUse appropriate technical factors
How Do We Respond?
![Page 59: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
![Page 60: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Clinical RadiologyOctober 2004; 39:928-934
![Page 61: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Weight mAAbdomen
Lbs Kg Chest or Pelvis10–19 4.5–8.9 40 6020–39 9.0–17.9 50 7040–59 18.0–26.9 60 8060–79 27.0–35.9 70 10080–99 36.0–45.0 80 120
100–150 45.1–70.0 100–120 140–150>150 >70 >140 >170
Suggested Tube Current (mA) by Weight of Pediatric Patients for Single-Detector Helical CT
Donnelly et al. AJR. 176;303
![Page 62: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Radiologist - Parameters• mAs
– Linear to dose (25-60% reduction in pediatric doses is possible for older CT scanners. Newer scanners may have suggested pediatric techniques selectable by the technologist
• kVp– Non linear to dose
20% ↓ kV = 30-40% ↓ dose
• MDCT > radiation
![Page 63: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
• Large abnormalities, or…• High contrast regions
– Lungs– Bones– CTARemember: A change of pitch from
1.1 to 0.9 can be compensated by a decrease in mAs by ~20%.
“Lower” Dose Pediatric MDCT
![Page 64: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
15 mAs
![Page 65: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
8mAs
![Page 66: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
CT Dose Reduction
• Bone studies: lower mA– Initially 100 mA : 1.3 cGy– Lowered... 40 mA : 0.5 cGy– Currently 20 mA : 0.2 5cGy
![Page 67: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
A Word about Fetal DosesACR’s appropriateness criteria – for Pelvic Exposures
Try or consider the imaging modalities in the following order: Ultrasound, MRI, Non-pelvic radiographs, non-bone nuclear medicine scans, non-pelvic fluoroscopy or CT, radiography of abdomen/pelvis, PET or bone scans, then pelvic fluoroscopy, CT, CT fluoroscopy.
For Pelvic CT, Fluoroscopy, or CT Fluoroscopy consider a pregnancy test on potentially gravid females before performing these tests. Have medical physicist project fetal dose if exposure to female is absolutely required.
![Page 68: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Fetal Dose ContinuedDoses calculated to be less than 5 RAD represent a 40% increase in the risk rate of a cancer to the child. For example if risk is 1/100,000, then after 5 RAD to the fetus, the risk becomes 1.4/100,000.
Doses exceeding 10 RAD may have consequences including mildly diminished mental capacities.
Doses exceeding 15 RAD probably should be recommended for genetic and spiritual counseling, as malformations, Down’s Syndrome, and more significant risks for cancer could be in the future life of the child. It should also be considered that the child may spontaneously abort. This is a situation for genetic and spiritual counselors, in conjunction with some deep parental emotional considerations. Also, to be considered is that the child probably will be borne healthy.
![Page 69: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Conclusion
We are part of the way there
• We Need to be Proactive Involve Non-Imagers Control Our DepartmentsEngage Our Community
![Page 70: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
![Page 71: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
There is No Ionizing Radiation When You Don’t
Do the C.T. Exam
Remember……..
![Page 72: CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction - Keystone Physics...2. Discussion of non-radiation alternative imaging modalities 3. Review of patient medical radiation history – especially](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052518/5f0600267e708231d415cb2d/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
The ALARA* Concept in
Pediatric CT
*As Low As Reasonably Achievable