ctm 201112
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
1/32
December 2011
Volume 8, No. 12
Strategies, analysis, and news for FX traders
The Europeancrisis and theforex market
p. 12
Conducting awalk-forward teston an FX volatility
breakout systemp. 18
Dollar index
deconstruction:Understanding theDXYs drivers p. 22
Dollars down under:
Aussie and kiwioutlook p. 6
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
2/322 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
CONTENTS
Contributors................................................. 4
Global Markets
Aussie up, Aussie down .............................6
Analysts argue whether the currencies have put
in long-term tops, but all agree risk sentiment
remains key to the prospects for the Aussie and
New Zealand dollars.
By Currency Trader Staff
On the Money............................................ 12
The long, deep game
If it can survive its crisis with only Greece leav-
ing the EMU, Europe will have the gold-standardcurrency for a whole new generation. To that
end, the IMF may end up getting involved.
By Barbara Rockefeller
Trading Strategies
Walk-forward analysis of a volatility
breakout system ......................................18
Progressively updating a trading system to
recent market data provides insight into how
robust the technique is and allows it to adjust to
changing market conditions.
By Daniel Fernandez
Advanced Concepts
Decomposing the Dollar Index ...............22
Analyzing the DXY shows how all trades involve
comparing alternatives and those alternatives
have to be accounted for on a complete cost
basis.
By Howard L. Simons
Global Economic Calendar ........................28
Important dates for currency traders.
Events .......................................................28
Conferences, seminars, and other events.
Currency Futures Snapshot.................29
International Markets............................ 30
Numbers from the global forex, stock, and
interest-rate markets.
Looking for an
advertiser?
Click on the company
name for a direct link to thead in this months issue.
eSignal
FXCM
Nadex
Ninja Trader
Questions or comments?Submit editorial queries or comments to
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.fxcm.com/ -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
3/32
http://www.fxcm.com/ -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
4/32
CONTRIBUTORS
4 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
Editor-in-chief: Mark Etzkorn
Managing editor: Molly Goad
Contributing editor:
Howard Simons
Contributing writers:
Barbara Rockefeller,
Marc Chandler, Chris Peters
Editorial assistant and
webmaster: Kesha Green
President: Phil Dorman
Publisher, ad sales:
Bob Dorman
Classifed ad sales: Mark Seger
Volume 8, Issue 12. Currency Trader is published monthly by TechInfo,Inc., PO Box 487, Lake Zurich, Illinois 60047. Copyright 2011 TechInfo,Inc. All rights reserved. Information in this publication may not be stored orreproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher.
The information in Currency Trader magazine is intended for educationalpurposes only. It is not meant to recommend, promote or in any way implythe effectiveness of any trading sys tem, strategy or approach. Traders areadvised to do their own research and testing to determine the validity of atrading idea. Trading and investing carry a high level of risk. Past perfor-mance does not guarantee future results.
For all subscriber services:www.currencytradermag.com
A publication of Active Trader
CONTRIBUTORS
qHoward Simons is president of Rosewood
Trading Inc. and a strategist for Bianco Research.
He writes and speaks frequently on a wide range
of economic and nancial market issues.
qBarbara Rockefeller(www.rts-forex.com) is an international
economist with a focus on foreign exchange. She has worked as a
forecaster, trader, and consultant at Citibank and other nancial
institutions, and currently publishes two daily reports on foreign
exchange. Rockefeller is the author ofTechnical Analysis for Dum-
mies, Second Edition (Wiley, 2011), 24/7 Trading Around the Clock,
Around the World (John Wiley & Sons, 2000), The Global Trader
(John Wiley & Sons, 2001), and How to Invest Internationally, pub-
lished in Japan in 1999. A book tentatively titled How to Trade FX
is in the works. Rockefeller is on the board of directors of a large
European hedge fund.
qDaniel Fernandezis an active trader with a
strong interest in calculus, statistics, and econom-
ics who has been focusing on the analysis of forex
trading strategies, particularly algorithmic trad-
ing and the mathematical evaluation of long-term
system protability. For the past two years he has
published his research and opinions on his blog Reviewing Eve-
rything Forex, which also includes reviews of commercial and
free trading systems and general interest articles on forex trading
(http://mechanicalforex.com). Fernandez is a graduate of theNational University of Colombia, where he majored in chemistry,
concentrating in computational chemistry. He can be reached at
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.currencytradermag.com/http://www.rts-forex.com/http://mechanicalforex.com/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://mechanicalforex.com/http://www.rts-forex.com/http://www.currencytradermag.com/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
5/32
Call today for information on a 30-day,risk-free trial, plus get your 2nd monthof service for FREE!* Limited-time offer.
800.215.7202eSignal, an Interactive Data company.
*Sign up for your 30-day, risk-free trial, and if youre not completely thrilled duringthe trial, cancel the service, and we will refund your subscription fees. Exchangefees are non-refundable (usually $10). 2nd month free is a limited-time offer.Both offers are only available for new customers. x14435
If youre asking the question, Which trading
software is best for me?, youre not alone. We
help thousands of traders reach their trading goals
by offering eSignal, the most-often-awarded, real-time
data and charting package available today. Here are
just 7 reasons why you should be using eSignal:
ReasonsWhy You Need
eSignal 1171. Award-Winning
Trading Systems
2. Reliable Real-Time Data
3. Integration with YourChoice of Broker(s)
4. Powerful TradeAnalysis Tools
5. The Worlds Markets
6. The Best Value in
Market Data7. A Special, Limited-
Time Offer
www.eSignal.com/7ReasonsCT
Want more information? Go to
www.eSignal.com/7ReasonsCT
to read the full story and see
eSignal in action.
Youll make more, because youll know more.
http://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCThttp://www.esignal.com/7reasonsCT -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
6/326 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
GLOBAL MARKETS
In early December, the Australian/U.S. dollar pair (AUD/USD) had been trading at virtually the same level it wasat the end of 2010, around 1.0200 (Figure 1). However, thatnearly unchanged value doesnt reflect the major swings
the pair made throughout the year.The AUD/USD rate hit 1.1080 in July its highest level
since January 1982. However, as the Eurozone sovereigndebt situation continued to deteriorate in late summer and
early fall, AUD/USD plunged belowparity to .9387 in early October as riskaversion swept the globe and moneymanagers rushed back into the per-ceived safety of the U.S. dollar andU.S. dollar denominated debt (Figure2). The Aussie dollar clearly was heldcaptive to the risk-on, risk-off outlookin global money swings.
Amongst the G-10 currencies, theAussie is everyones favorite due toits [high] yield and strong fiscal andgrowth fundamentals, says Greg
Anderson, senior FX strategist at Citi.But when the markets get into apanic, [money managers] close off longpositions in the Aussie.
In early December, risk appetite wasat least temporarily back on, which isshort-term bullish for Aussie/dollar.As the new year approaches, severalquestions swirl around the Aussiecurrency, including whether the latestmove by the Reserve Bank of Australiasignals the start of a new monetary
Aussie up, Aussie down
Analysts argue whether the currencies have put in long-term tops, but all agree risk sentiment
remains key to the prospects for the Australian and New Zealand dollars.
BY CURRENCY TRADER STAFF
FIGURE 1: WEEKLY AUSSIE/U.S. DOLLAR
The Aussie dollar entered December 2011 almost exactly where it ended
December 2010, but it moved around a lot in between.
Source for all figures: TradeStation
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
7/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011
policy trend or was it simply a one-time cut?
Also, the New Zealand dollar(kiwi) often trades in the same man-ner as the Aussie dollar, but is not asfavored by bigger players because of itslower liquidity. Will the kiwi face thesame issues as the Aussie dollar?
Fundamentals
Australia weathered the 2008-2009global financial crisis the best amongG-10 nations, escaping the sustainednegative growth suffered by virtuallyevery other mature economy. It wasthe only major advanced industrial-ized nation to sidestep recession, saysWells Fargo economist Tim Quinlan.They only had one quarter of negative
GDP growth. The accepted economicdefinition of recession is two consecu-tive quarters of negative GDP growth.
However, a number of challenges and setbacks for theAussie economy emerged in early 2011, including the mas-sive devastation from the floods in the northeast portionof the country. Also, the Japanese earthquake and tsunamiimpacted Australian growth because a good deal of Aussieexports end up in Japan.
These factors held back the Aussie economy, Quinlansays, noting the countrys -3.4 percent GDP figure forthe first quarter of 2011. However, Q2 saw the economy
bounce back with a 4.8-percent growth rate.Overall, bright spots remain, which analysts believe
should keep Australias annual GDP in positive terri-tory. We expect the Australian economy will grow 1.8percent in 2011, says Katrina Ell, associate economistwith Moodys Analytics. We expect GDP will grow 4 per-cent in 2012 as mining investment and reconstruction inQueensland drive stronger growth. Australias economyis showing signs of resilience amid a gloomy global back-drop. The mining boom is pushing full steam ahead, whichis driving strong expansion in construction and invest-ment. Ell adds the entire country is benefiting from the
mining boom, which has contributed to a low unemploy-ment rate and solid wage growth.
Overall, Australian growth is led by its exports, withcoal accounting for a major portion. Ieisha Montgomery,associate economist at Northern Trust, says coal represent-ed 19.8 percent of Australias total export basket, with 25percent of their exports heading to China and 19 percentto Japan. Australias top four trading partners are China,Japan, South Korea, and India, which leaves the Eurozoneand the U.S. having much less influence on their overall
growth. Quinlan notes that only 4.1 percent of Australiasexports head to Europe, with 4.0 percent winding theirway to the U.S.
Nonetheless, despite a looser connection betweenAustralia and Western Europe, what unfolds ahead inthe Eurozone and U.S. will trickle back to Australia in themonths ahead.
Ultimately, all [Australian] exports to China are rawmaterials, which are turned into manufactured goods andsold to many places, including Europe, Quinlan says.
The biggest risk to Australias economic outlook is amarked slowdown in China, which would weigh heavily
FIGURE 2: DAILY AUSSIE/DOLLAR
The AUD/USD pair sold off fairly sharply after peaking above 1.1000 in July.
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
8/328 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
GLOBAL MARKETS
on demand for Australias resources and prompt business-es to abandon investment plans, Ell explains.
The spillover to weaker employment, confidence, andhousehold incomes would cause consumers to pull back,she says. Nevertheless, China is headed for a soft landingin 2012, and if this [view] looks at risk, the Chinese gov-ernment has the capacity to respond swiftly. Meanwhile,if conditions in Europe deteriorate markedly, credit condi-tions could tighten and trigger a crisis of confidence.
Even if Australia begins to slow, Ell is optimistic the
country is well positioned to deal with moderating growth.If Australias growth is hampered, monetary and fiscalpolicymakers have scope to stimulate the economy, shesays. Policymakers would lower interest rates to stimulateconsumer spending and the housing market. Sound fiscalmanagement and a low debt burden give the governmentroom to provide a fiscal stimulus and still preserve theeconomys long-term prospects.
Monetary policy
After a year on hold, on Nov. 1 the Reserve Bank ofAustralia (RBA) cut its official monetary policy rate by
0.25 percent to 4.50 percent. The official rate in Australia,now at 4.5 percent, is still the highest rate among theworlds developed economies, wrote Wells Fargo econo-mists in the Nov. 16 Global Chartbook research note. Thecut reflects a move from a restrictive monetary policy toone that is more accommodative in light of the weakerglobal growth outlook. While the headline rate of infla-tion remains slightly elevated, the downtrend in the coreinflation rate grants the RBA the scope necessary to pivotits policy to a more supportive stance without concern onengendering runaway inflation.
Why did they ease? In the months leading up to the
meeting there was continued deterioration in the Europeansovereign-debt situation, which had the IMF and OECDdownwardly revise forecasts for emerging [country]growth, Quinlan says. He adds that with approximately66 percent of Australias exports heading to either Japan oremerging-market economies, slower growth in emergingeconomies would dampen demand for Australias exportsector.
Most market watchers expect the RBA to take a wait-and-see approach in the near term. The bank is scheduledto meet on Dec. 6; most analysts anticipate it will hold
steady on rates. The Reserve Bank of Australia will likely
remain on the sidelines and keep rates on hold for theforeseeable future, despite market expectations for furthercuts, Ell says. However, if Europes debt situation wors-ens and impacts Australia and its trading partners, furtherrate cuts are expected.
Anderson says the interest-rate outlook for Australiahinges on the external environment, because the domesticsituation probably doesnt warrant a rate cut.
New Zealand fundamentals
On the New Zealand front, Moodys Analytics forecastsoverall 1.2 percent GDP growth in 2011 and a 1.6 percentforecast for 2012. Overall, the countrys economy is slightlylagging its larger neighbor.
New Zealands economy is growing below trend, withpersistent household deleveraging contributing to weakprivate consumption, says Fred Gibson, associate econo-mist at Moodys Analytics. Given the governments com-mitment to returning the budget to surplus by 2015, thepublic sector is providing minimal support to growth. Onthe upside, soft commodity exports are strengthening asAsias growing middle class demands a high quality and
reliable source of dairy and meat products.While Australias outlook depends heavily on China
and emerging Asia, New Zealand can be viewed as a littlesister to Australia, heavily dependent on the countrys eco-nomic fortunes.
Australia is New Zealands biggest trading partner,Montgomery explains, noting that 23 percent of NewZealand exports head to Australia, with 11.2 percent goingto China. Some of its key exports include forestry prod-ucts, meat, dairy, and wool.
Interestingly, the major earthquake that struck NewZealand in February 2011 should actually contribute to
better GDP figures in 2012. Earthquake reconstructionshould ramp up growth in 2012 and should help the realestate sector, Montgomery says. Shes forecasting 2.8 per-cent GDP growth in New Zealand next year.
New Zealand has several other factors working in itsfavor.
Sustained Asian demand for New Zealands soft com-modity exports is helping support growth, Gibson says.The recent Rugby World Cup and the influx of some85,000-plus tourists have helped drive a rise in retailspending. Investment is building gradually as capital
imports grow, suggesting firms are gearing up to rebuild
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
9/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 9
ures trading and options trading involve risk, which may result in nancial loss, and are not suitable for everyone. Any trading decisions that you may make are solely your responsibility. The information presented hereor informational purposes only. The contents hereof are not an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any particular nancial instrument listed on Nadex. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trade on a
huge range
of markets.
Nadex is a derivatives exchange
that lists innovative contracts on
global Equity Indices, Commodities,
Forex and Economic Events.
Not only is membership free,
but you can start trading with as
little as $100. And youll never
be at risk of losing more than the
collateral in your account.
Join us at www.nadex.com
or call 1 877 776 2339
http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/http://www.nadex.com/ -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
10/3210 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
GLOBAL MARKETS
Christchurch.The kiwi/dollar rate (NZD/USD) has also come under
pressure in the early fall months because of the same fac-tors impacting the Aussie dollar (Figure 3).
The major driver behind the sustained depreciationof the kiwi has been increased risk aversion because ofEuropes sovereign debt crisis, Gibson says. Growinguncertainty and volatility in financial markets haveprompted investors to shun perceived riskier currenciessuch as the kiwi in favor of haven currencies such as theyen. This has caused the kiwi to depreciate sharply, despitelittle change in economic fundamentals since July.
For now, market watchers see the Reserve Bank of NewZealand (RBNZ) on hold at 2.50 percent, after a rate cut inthe aftermath of the February earthquake.
We believe that rates will remain on hold until March2012 to help safeguard growth against a deteriorating glob-al recovery, Gibson says. Barring another global creditcrunch, we think the RBNZ will start its tightening cycle
from March 2012 by reversing this years 50-basis-pointinsurance cut. A further 25-basis-point hike is expected inthe third quarter of 2012.
Forex action
Risk appetite and prevailing market sentiment will likelydrive the Aussie dollar in the near future.
The second risk comes off, people come back in andbuy Aussie first, Anderson notes. That will continue nextyear. I expect it to be the star performer in the G-10.
Anderson holds a roughly comparable view for thekiwi/dollar: Its similar, but not quite as liquid. It doesnthave as high a yield, so its slightly less attractive, heexplains.
Major tops?
There is some discord among analysts regarding the sum-mer highs scored by the Aussie and kiwi dollars. Some saythose could represent major long-term tops for the cur-
rencies, while others expect renewedstrength later in 2012.
Among those expecting these highsto represent longer-term resistance isStephen Roberts, chief economist-Aus-tralia at Nomura. When asked if the1.1000 area represented an importanthigh, Roberts says it probably [willbe] a peak for quite a while to comegiven the likely persistent headwindsto global growth prospects from fis-cal consolidation and deleveraging in
much of the developed world.Sean Callow, senior currency strate-
gist at Westpac Institutional Bank,holds a similar view.
It is indeed looking increasinglyas though the mid-2011 peaks around1.1000 were the cycle high for AUD/USD, he says. Since then we havehad a sea change in the RBA view,from a firm tightening bias to anactual rate cut, and more to come.AUD has lost some of its high yield
FIGURE 3: DAILY KIWI
The New Zealand dollar also declined after hitting new highs over the summer. Its fate is
largely tied to that of its Australian cousin.
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
11/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 11
luster, with the two-year bond spread falling below 300basis points for the first time since July 2009. As the globaleconomy has cooled, Australias commodity prices havefallen about 17 percent from the April highs. Along withheightened equity volatility, such factors produce fairvalue estimates no higher than the low .90s.
However, Callow adds its by no means all doom andgloom for the AUD. Should the U.S. economy slowenough for the Fed to adopt QE3, AUD would be one ofthe key beneficiaries quite possibly the best performer,he says. Moreover, Australias very strong fiscal positionshould underpin demand for AUD government bonds.
He explains the Australian government noted in its mid-fiscal-year update that the average net debt position ofthe major advanced economies (G7) is projected to reach92.9 percent of GDP in 2016, more than 10 times higherthan the expected peak in Australias net debt of 8.9 per-cent of GDP.
There has been no sign of slackening in demand forAustralian Commonwealth government bonds, he says.Australias trade position should also remain strongerthan its historical average, with mining sector investmentvery robust and the terms of trade holding at elevatedlevels despite decline in recent months, Callow says. Sowhile European turmoil may well knock AUD/USD to,say, 0.93 before year end, we do not expect a slide of any-where near the magnitude of late 2008.
Turing to the kiwi, he notes that NZD/USD shouldswing with global risk sentiment as AUD does, with our
one-month target at 0.71.
Euro resolution
Brian Dolan, chief currency strategist at Forex.com, saysthe Eurozone debt crisis will be a pivotal factor for theAussie dollar in the weeks and months ahead.
Aussie/dollar is still captive to overall risk sentiment,which is dominated by the Eurozone debt crisis, he says.Unless the ECB changes its mandate to enable it to buygovernment debt directly or it steps in to lend to the IMF[so they can buy Eurozone debt], it is likely to keep Aussieand kiwi under pressure.
Michael Woolfolk, managing director at BNY Mellon,offers a more optimistic scenario.
We expect risk appetite to rebound next year on resolu-tion of the European debt crisis, he says. Assuming thatunfolds, Woolfolk cited his firms forecasts for the Aussie/dollar pair to hit 1.1000 by the middle of 2012 and 1.1500
by the end of the year.Part of that view, Woolfolk explains, includes a generally
negative outlook for the U.S. dollar, with U.S. interest ratesexpected to stay at zero and the belief the U.S. Fed willengage in some form of quantitative easing, he says.
Once we get some type of finality to the European situ-
ation, the safe-haven flows will reverse and leave the U.S.,which will be favorable for the Aussie, loonie (Canadiandollar) and dollar bloc as well, Woolfolk says. He high-lights targets of 0.8730 for kiwi/dollar by mid-year and0.9350 for year-end 2012.
Dont be sucked into the Euro break-up scenario that isbeing peddled right now, he adds. Its not going to hap -pen. The Eurozone will survive and prosper in the comingyears, though maybe with a few less members.y
Should the U.S. economy slow
enough for the Fed to adopt QE3,
AUD would be one of the key
beneficiaries quite possibly the
best performer.
Sean Callow, senior currency strategist at
Westpac Institutional Bank
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
12/32
Europe seems to be on the financial rocks, with five of17 governments having fallen this year, peripheral bondyields at eye-watering levels, and even Germany unableto sell bonds. European equity markets are tanking andtaking other markets with them. Data indicates a recessionis looming; the Bundesbank forecasts 0.5-percent GermanGDP growth in 2012 at the low end.
Nonetheless, Figure 1 shows the Euro/U.S. dollar pair(EUR/USD) is not dramatically below the midpoint(1.3958) of the range from its high of 1.6038 on July 18,
2008, to its low of 1.1877 on June 11, 2010. In fact, in Aprilof this year the Euro penetrated upside resistance, andalthough in September it broke downside support, the sec-ondary support line (gray) in Figure 1 may hold.
We can complain about the markets asymmetrical treat-ment of the Euro (good news is overvalued and bad newsis dismissed or downplayed), but the Euros resiliencereflects more than a Teflon coating its miraculous. If allthese woes befell another currency, it would have depreci-ated by 20 to 40 percent or more. Somewhere, presumably,
there must be long-term investors
with an abiding faith in the sustain-ability of the Eurozone experimentand the principles that underlie theEuro. If we use the two-year note asthe correct benchmark during a crisis,we see some distress and divergencebetween the Euro and German two-year note, but still a strong correlation(Figure 2). Since the Germans wouldrather underfund an auction than paytoo high a price, the Euro still has astrong foundation.
Europe on the rocksIn late November Germany auctioned6 billion worth of 10-year bunds butwas able to sell only 3.64 billion, or60 percent, with an average yield of1.98 percent. The bid-to-cover ratiowas a horrible 1.1, compared to a bid-to-cover of 3.15 the day before in U.S.five-year notes, which was the higheston record in the past 10 years. TheU.S. sold seven times as much, too $35 billion. In the weeks leading up
to the failed German auction, Market
On the Money
12 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
ON THE MONEY
The long, deep game
If it can survive its crisis with only Greece leaving the EMU, Europe will have the gold-standard
currency for a whole new generation. To that end, the IMF may end up getting involved.
BY BARBARA ROCKEFELLER
FIGURE 1: EUR/USD
Despite Europes woes, the EUR/USD pair is not dramatically below the
midpoint of its July 2008 to June 2010 range.
Source: Chart Metastock; data Reuters and eSignal
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
13/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 13
News International (MNI) reported large Asian playerswere selling European bonds, including bunds. However,on many days MNI was also reporting large Asian players
were continuing to buy Euros at interim lows, presumablyfor reserve diversification purposes.
Meanwhile, as political crises swelled and receded inGreece, Italy, and Spain, the 10-year yield on their bondsrose above 6 percent and, for Italy, above 7 percent thelevel at which other governments (Ireland, Portugal) hadfallen. Sure enough, all three governments were replaced.The new leaders will institute the same reforms andausterity budgets as the already fallen governments, soeconomically and financially nothing has changed exceptthe names on the doors. In fact, its still not clear Greecewill be getting the 8 billion of bailout money if two new
government coalition partners continue to refuse to signthe reform/austerity letter demanded by the EuropeanCommission a cliffhanger.
Everyone recognizes government deficits need to be cutpretty much everywhere and the financial sector needsrecapitalization. Germany and the new ECB PresidentMario Draghi insist the ECB not be used as a lender oflast resort and that there be no new pan-EMU Eurobondissuance, but a viable European Financial Stability Facility(EFSF) backstop has yet to be designed.
Vitriol abounds. In a recent diatribe, Nick Farage, aBritish member of the European Parliament, said it was adisgrace for the EU to be ousting democratically elected
governments in Greece and Italy. Addressing EU PresidentHerman Van Rompuy,European Commissionchief Jos ManuelBarroso, Eurogroupleader Jean-ClaudeJuncker, and EFSF presi-dent Olli Rehn, Faragesaid, Here we are onthe edge of a financialand social disaster andin the room today wehave the four men who
are supposed to beresponsible. And yetwe have listened to thedullest, most techno-cratic speeches Ive everheard ... You are all indenial. By any objectivemeasure the Euro is afailure. And who exactlyis responsible, who isin charge out of all youlot? The answer is noneof you because none of
you have been elected; none of you have any democraticlegitimacy for the roles you currently hold within this cri-sis. And into this vacuum, albeit reluctantly, has stepped
Angela Merkel. And we are now living in a German-dominated Europe something that the European proj-ect was actually supposed to stop. Something that thosewho went before us actually paid a heavy price in bloodto prevent. I dont want to live in a German-dominatedEurope and nor do the citizens of Europe. (Source: www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.html.)
This speech is a Holy cow! moment. Farage is railingas much against a German-dominated Europe as againstinadequate leadership. But he is wrong. A German-dominated Europe is exactly what Europe has had for
more than a century and also exactly what the EMU mem-bers states signed on for when they signed the MaastrichtTreaty.
The key components of the Maastricht Treaty are anindependent central bank based on Bundesbank prin-ciples specifically, one in which all policy decisions aredirected toward low inflation. Hard on the heels of theMaastricht Treaty came another German initiative, theStability and Growth Pact, which limits annual deficits to 3percent of GDP and total government debt to 60 percent ofGDP. The signatories to these two treaties were willing toagree with Germany on these issues for one simplereason German could reunify East and West sectors on
its own terms but would give up the Deutsche mark.
FIGURE 2: GERMAN TWO-YEAR NOTE
There is still a strong correlation between the Euro and German two-year note.
Source: www.fxthoughts.com
http://www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.htmlhttp://www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.htmlhttp://www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.htmlhttp://www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.htmlhttp://www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.htmlhttp://www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.htmlhttp://www.ukipmeps.org/articles_263_Farage-Puppet-governments-installed-in-Greece-and-Italy.html -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
14/3214 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
ON THE MONEY
Consider the timeline. Reunification began in 1990,the Maastricht Treaty forming the Eurozone was signedin 1992, and the Stability and Growth Pact was signedin 1997. The Euro was launched Jan. 1, 1999. Why was itworth anything to the other countries that Germany wouldgive up the Deutsche mark? Their currencies had beenexplicitly pegged to the DM (or at least compared to it) fordecades, in the snake and the European Rate Mechanism
(ERM). The Deutsche mark was the standard for excellencein economic management in the post-war world. The othercountries wanted to reduce the influence of Germany (andthe Bundesbank) on the other European economies andcurrencies. Germany giving upthe Deutsche mark was a real-world way of doing that, farbeyond its symbolic value. Ineffect, what Germany gave upwas its central place in the cur-rency world.
And what did the rest ofEurope get out of it? By shel-
tering under the Eurozoneumbrella they got lower inter-est rates than they could havegotten on their own. They gotrid of periodic currency crisesand painful devaluations. Theygot capital inflows inspired byrelative currency market stabil-ity. They also got bigger trans-fers in the form of agriculturaland development subsidies. Whole towns were rebuilton European money, including the port city of Valencia,Spain, which went on to host the Americas Cup yacht race.
To be fair, Germany gave up something it didnt want inthe first place: the potential for the DM to be the targetof destabilizing hot-money inflows in crises, much as theSwiss franc is today.
But Germany benefits in other ways, too. The Germanexport boom over the past decade is due as much toother EMU members as to emerging markets. Think-tankanalyst Sebastian Mallaby, the Paul A. Volcker senior fel-low in international economics at the Council on ForeignRelations, wrote in the Nov. 24, 2011 Financial Times:
[T]he currency union that makes adjustment in theperiphery so excruciating is the very same currency unionthat handed Germany its export boom. Rather than con-
demning lazy southerners, the Germans should share theloot.
Germany has benefited more than it acknowledgesthrough the monetary channel, too. During the Eurosfirst decade, interest rates across the Eurozone fell towardGerman ones, and low-saving southern countries appearedto derive a subsidy from the credit rating of high-savingnorthern ones. But, far from being a boon to the periphery,
centralized monetary policy proved appropriate for theEUs mature core, but too loose for inflation-prone catch-up economies. By an irony that inflation-hating Germanshave trouble seeing, Ireland and Spain suffered property
and banking busts at least partlybecause monetary policy was tooGerman. Rather than scorn thelosers, Germany should compen-sate them.
Mallaby is defending the pointof view that Germany should bewilling to pay more to save theEurozone. Whether in the form of
the ECB monetizing debt (likethe Fed), backing a Eurobond,or through some other measure,Germany should rebalance itsperception of self-interest; it has alot to lose if the Eurozone were tobreak up.
Consider the assumptionsEurozone political leaders, espe-
cially in France, have baldly stated they want the Euroto supplant the dollar as the worlds reserve currency.Becoming the reserve currency is not a stated goal of any
of the treaties, but its surely present in the back of every-ones mind.
Another concept at work is that no country ever pros-pered by devaluing its currency. So while academics andtechnocrats plead for the ECB to become a lender of lastresort, possibly going as far as engaging in quantitativeeasing (as conducted by Japan, the U.S., the UK, and evenSwitzerland), Germany and the ECB oppose this formof monetization of debt. They say their opposition is toenforce the Stability Pact, but underlying the Stability Pactis the core concept that monetization leads to devalua-tion. The tactic of monetizing debt flies in the face of the
long game, which is to forge a stable currency based on the
The U.S. has had a
depreciation policy for
most of the 40 years
since President Nixontook the U.S. off the gold
standard in 1971.
http://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Concepts -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
15/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 15
expectation of no inflation or devaluation, ever.German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the Bundesbankwant the Euro to be as well-grounded as the Deutschemark. Two top Bundesbank officials President AxelWeber and Vice President Jrgen Stark went so faras to resign on losing the argument that the ECB shouldbuy a limited amount of sovereign debt. So far the ECBhas bought less than 300 billion in sovereign debt in thesecondary market Stark and Weber presumably wouldhave had the amount be zero. Current Bundesbank chiefJens Weidmann has taken upon himself the job as ECB-watcher and enforcer, saying By assuming the role oflender of last resort for highly indebted member states, the
bank would overextend its mandate and shed doubt on thelegitimacy of its independence. To follow this path wouldbe like drinking seawater to quench a thirst.
The Germans are accused of selfishness and even sabo-tage of the Eurozone experiment,but its possible to interpret theirmulish stubbornness as some-thing else: the desire to sponsorthe worlds first bulletproof fiatcurrency. After all, let us not for-get the U.S. has had a policy ofdepreciation for most of the 40years since President Nixon tookthe U.S. off the gold standard in1971. Sometimes it has been anexplicit policy and the U.S. hasbullied others into cooperating,such as the Nixon 10-percentimport surcharge and trade defi-cit targets in 1973, as well as thePlaza Accord in 1985. Other times the policy was implicit.Rarely did the U.S. aim for a stable or appreciating curren-cy, one of the exceptions being the Reagan-Volcker regimein the early 1980s. During the Clinton years, TreasurySecretary Robert Rubin declared a strong dollar is in the
U.S. best interests, the so-called strong-dollar mantra, butby the time of the 2007-08 financial crisis and the adventof quantitative easing, the phrase was falling flat, eventhough current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner con-tinues to say it. No one believes him: zero-percent interestrates, quantitative easing, and the Twist all point towarda weaker dollar, not a stronger one.
The Feds fear of deflation is real, but many observ-ers fear the refusal to live with and manage deflation canlead to only one thing inflation down the road. TheFed asserts it has the means to identify impending infla-tion and the will to cut it off at the pass, but not everyonehas confidence the Fed can deal with another round of the
kind of stagflation the U.S. suffered after the first oil shock
in 1973. A sense of grim foreboding lies over the land.If the Eurozone can survive the current financial crisiswith no more than one country leaving the EMU (Greece),Europe will be in the drivers seat as the gold-standardcurrency for a whole new generation. It wont matterwhether the Fed is able to contain inflation, Europe willhave the one thing investors want above all else: a rock-solid anti-inflation commitment. This is the long gameMerkel and the Bundesbank are playing.
At a guess, they wont win without some help. Thiswill mostly likely come from the International MonetaryFund (IMF), egged on by emerging-market countries suchas Brazil, Russia, India, and China, who have already
complained bitterly about U.S. policy being selfish andconducting the equivalent of a currency war. However, thisterm is inappropriate and there is little evidence the U.S.has a grand plan that entails deliberately harming other
countries for its own self-inter-est. It would be more accurate but no less damning tosay the U.S. is indifferent tohot-money inflows into emerg-ing markets that arise from thequest for yield by investors andspeculators. The U.S. has a splitattitude toward market inter-vention: Let the markets rulewhen its global capital flowsbut hands off U.S. intervention-ist monetary policy directedtoward U.S. institutions and theU.S. economy.
What can the IMF do? Itsmandate is to act as a lender of last resort to governmentsin temporary distress. We might think its embarrassingfor a major player such as the EMU to seek and to acceptfinancial aid from the IMF, although the UK is certainly amajor player and has done it. Besides, the IMF insists on
getting paid first and promptly (years, not decades), andso far has always succeeded. IMF aid is temporary andintended to restore imbalances in a crisis, which is precise-ly what exists in the Eurozone today. The IMF generallyembraces a monetarist approach and fiscal retrenchment,which is fine with the Bundesbank and ECB. The IMF alsousually calls for a devaluation, but thats not a hard andfast rule.
If the IMF could act as the lender of last resort, lettingthe ECB off the hook, the EMU would be buying time,exactly as it has been doing since Greece confessed tolying about its public finances in fall 2009. Recently theIMF announced it was preparing to expand its short-term
lending facility, renamed from the Precautionary Lending
If all these woes befell
a currency other than
the Euro, it would have
depreciated by 20percent or more.
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
16/3216 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
ON THE MONEY
Line to the Precautionary Lending and Liquidity Line(PLL). According to the IMF statement, the PLL will beavailable in broader circumstances, including as insur-ance against future shocks and as a short-term liquiditywindow to address the needs of crisis bystanders duringtimes of heightened regional or global stress and break thechains of contagion. It will be a lending facility designedto provide short-term liquidity to what it calls crisisbystanders, rather than just those impacted by naturaldisasters or rebuilding after a war.
The IMF has available lending resources of about $652billion, which together with 440 billion in the beefed-up EFSF might be enough to pull both governments andbanks out of the hole they are sliding into. In addition, theECB could lend to the IMF to increase the amount, and theIMF can turn around and lend to any government seekingaid, such as Greece, Spain, or Italy. Note that almost all ofthe IMFs lendable resources come from central banks which, of course, includes the U.S. Federal Reserve, so theFed would become a lender once-removed to distressed
European governments. In fact, the ECB could borrowdirectly from the Fed under the central bank swap lineand send that money to the IMF, too. You can view thisas a neat trick by Germany to avoid responsibility or as aperfectly legitimate fall-back under current internationalfinance rules.
An interesting aspect of the IMF bailout idea is that itwould allow the BRICs to get involved indirectly. China,for one, has declared support for some countries (includ-ing Spain) and for the EFSF, but evidently declined tomake a new commitment when EFSF CEO Klaus Reglingvisited Beijing in November 2011. Note that the EFSFalready operates in conjunction with the IMF. Because the
IMF demands it be repaid first, that might reassure BRICmembers. A fun problem is if China were given the extravotes it deserves in the IMF based on population andGDP (as proposed at the Pittsburgh G20 meeting in 2009),it would have more votes than the smallest G7 country,Canada. Europe may have an incentive to stand behindChina getting more IMF votes. Today, the single biggestvoter and contributor to the IMF is the U.S., at 17 percent.
Although the idea purloined from Karl von Clausewitzthat finance is war by other means is a bit of a stretch, itsometimes seems to come close. At an Asian summit, theU.S. declared itself a resident Pacific power, as a maritimenation, as a trading nation and as a guarantor of securityin the Asia Pacific region. The U.S. was warning China offfrom the South China Sea territorial fight it has been wag-ing bilaterally with smaller countries in a grab for under-sea resources. China backed down for the moment terri-torial claims will be decided by a multilateral process, notby China bullying countries one-by-one.
If and when it is announced the IMF has been called
in to consult with the Eurogroup, ECB, EuropeanCommission, and/or the EFSF, we are at risk of a tre-mendous rally in the Euro. We dont know for sure this isthe German plan, but kicking the can down the road hasworked so far, and in retrospect, has been leading to theIMF all along. Therefore, we do not buy into the scenariothat has the Euro falling ever farther. In fact, it may sta-bilize near the midpoint of the range in Figure 1, around1.3950. Keep in mind that another beneficiary of a rallyingEuro will be European equity markets (Figure 3).y
For information on the author, see p. 4.
FIGURE 3: MAJOR EUROPEAN EQUITY INDICES
European equity markets would be another beneficiary of a rallying Euro.
Source: Chart Metastock; data Reuters and eSignal
:
2007F MA M J J A S O N D 2009M A MJ J A S O N D 2010 A MJ J A S O N D 2011M A MJ J A S O N
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
x10
BlackGerman DAXGoldFrench CACBlueMadridRedAthens
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
17/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 17
http://www.activetradermag.com/http://www.activetradermag.com/http://www.activetradermag.com/ -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
18/3218 October2010CURRENCY TRADER18 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
A frequent question that arises when developing a tradingstrategy is how to properly determine specific parameters.Because market conditions are constantly changing, itsunrealistic to expect a system with fixed parameters toperform at a consistently high level over long time periods.But how do you decide if a strategy should use a certainstop-loss, profit target, or indicator period length ratherthan another? Whats the best way to adjust parametersover time?
The answer to these questions usually comes throughoptimization the process of testing multiple parametervalues on historical data to see which set gives the bestresults best being something that can be measured in
different ways. However, optimization presents anotherproblem: the potential for excessive fitting of a systemto past market conditions, which is likely to result in farworse results in future trading. For example, say a tradingsystem uses a moving average as one of its inputs and ahistorical test shows that a length of 24 days produced thehighest net profit, but that all other lengths between 20 and30 days performed poorly. Using a 24-day moving averagelength would be a poor choice for future trading because itis likely a fluke; this parameter selection is merely fitted tothe past data conditions, which are unlikely to be repeatedin the future.
TRADING STRATEGIESTRADING STRATEGIES
FIGURE 1: WALK-FORWARD TESTING
Walk-forward analysis applies optimized parameters
from the most recent period (blue rectangles) to the
subsequent forward-test periods (green rectangles),
re-optimizing the parameters at regular intervals.
Walk-forward analysisof a volatility breakoutsystem
Progressively updating a trading system to recent market
data provides insight into how robust the technique is and
allows it to adjust to changing market conditions.
BY DANIEL FERNANDEZ
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
19/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 1
Walk-forward analysis is one of the most powerful tech-niques for evaluating whether a strategy can survive theparameter selection process that is, whether the ideaof optimizing and using a given set of best parametersis justified. In this procedure a strategy is optimized for
a period ofx bars and the results of the optimization areused fory bars in the future, at which point the proce-dure is repeated to obtain the parameter settings for thesubsequent trading period. This process of walking thestrategy forward through successive sets of new data isdesigned to keep the system as up to date as possible withchanging market conditions.
Figure 1 illustrates how this is carried out. The blue rect-angles represent the optimization periods and the greenrectangles represent the subsequent forward-testing peri-ods to which the optimized parameter settings are applied.By running a 10-year test with constant re-optimizationand the use of the best parameters through every newforward-testing period, we can get a very good idea ofhow our strategy handles changing parameter values, andwhether doing this makes sense.
The system
To illustrate the walk-forward analysis process, we will usea daily time frame trend-following strategy (based on vola-tility breakouts) that includes two parameters. Basically,the system takes a position in the direction of the mostrecent days momentum (as determined by whether theclose is above or below the open) as long as that momen-tum exceeds a certain threshold, the logic being that such
a move will be followed by more price movement in thesame direction:
1. Go long if the most recent days close is above theopen and the open-to-close range is greater than xpips.
2. Go short if the most recent daysclose is below the open and theopen-to-close range is greater thanx pips.
3. Close a position after it has beenopen fory days.
4. Only one trade can be open at atime.
5. Trade 0.00001 times the currentaccount balance per signal.
This type of strategy is perfect forillustrating walk-forward analysisbecause it has a limited number ofparameters that can be optimizedquickly and conveniently. Other thanthe position-sizing rule (step 5), thestrategy has no inherent dynamic capa-
bilities (such as volatility adapted indicators). As a result,the only way the system can possibly adapt to evolvingmarket conditions is by changing parameters x (the intra-day move threshold that determines trade entry) and/or y(the holding period).
The walk-forward process
The strategy was applied to the Euro/U.S. dollar pair(EUR/USD) over a 10-year period starting in January2001 and ending in January 2011, with optimization ofparameters x andy conducted every 50 calendar days onthe most recent 300 calendar days. Parameter x was opti-mized from 10 and 500 pips in 10-pip increments (10, 20,30, 40500), whiley was optimized between one and 50days in one-day increments (1, 2, 3, 450). The best resultfor each optimization period was defined as the largestnet profit; the parameter set that produced this result wasused for the subsequent segment of the forward test (thenext 50-day period). Trading costs of 2 pips per trade were
applied throughout the test.The primary advantage of this analysis is that it elimi-nates hindsight: Although we dont know which param-eters will be used for each upcoming 50-day period, wehave a very clear process for establishing how to derivethese values from the previous data. In the end we have aresult that tells us how our strategy will behave if we had
FIGURE 2: EQUITY CURVE
The system was profitable overall, with one major drawdown followed by a new
equity high at the end of the test window.
TABLE 1: STRATEGY STATISTICS
Annualized return 19.65%
Max. drawdown 32.87%
Win percent 58%
Reward/risk ratio 1.41
Ulcer Index 10.79
Profit factor 1.94
No. of trades 171
The strategys performance statistics were solid an
average compound yearly profit of 19.65 percent and a
maximum drawdown of 32.87 percent.
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
20/32
applied a constant set of rules for theselection of parameters through thewhole test.
Results
Figure 2 shows the systems equitycurve using the parameters derivedfrom the walk-forward process. Thesystem was profitable overall, indicat-ing the technique has an edge that ismaintained in the long-term basedon the constant re-optimization of the
systems parameters. Table 1 showsthat the strategys basic performancemetrics were quite good, with anaverage compound yearly profit of19.65 percent and a maximum draw-down of 32.87 percent. The maximumdrawdown length was 644 days, inline with what we would expect for atrend-following system on the dailytime frame.
The monthly returns in Figure 3show the best-performing condi-tions for this system have actuallydeveloped within the past three years(despite the most significant draw-down also occurring during this peri-od). This highlights how re-optimiza-tion allowed the strategy to functionduring the financial crisis even thoughsuch extreme conditions had not pre-viously appeared in the test period.When a strategy fails to produce prof-itable results in walk-forward analysis,it implies the strategys best parameterchoice always lagged the changes in
market conditions. Such systems havea high probability of always givingcurve-fitted results and theres a highchance their profitability is entirelybased on hindsight.
Its also interesting how the opti-mum parameters evolved over time.These changes show us how marketconditions have changed and if thesystem has actually adapted. Figure4 shows the entry (x, bottom) andexit (y, top) parameters oscillated
20 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
TRADING STRATEGIES
FIGURE 4: EVOLVING PARAMETER VALUES
The exit (top) and entry (bottom) parameters oscillated significantly over the
course of the test.
FIGURE 3: MONTHLY RETURNS
Re-optimization helped the strategy continue to perform during the financial
crisis.
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
21/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 21
substantially throughout the test period, implying that thestrategys character has varied significantly in responseto changing market conditions. Table 2 shows the entryparameter ranged from 50 to 150 pips, had a median valueof 60, and a mode (most frequently occurring value) of 50.(The estimated mode, which derives a hypothetical modevalue based on a data sets median and average values,was also 50.) The exit parameter (number of days untilexit) ranged from 1 to 49, with a median of 15 (average 18)and a mode of 6 (estimated mode of 9).
When extreme drastic market changes occurred (e.g.,during the financial crisis) the system adapted by drasti-cally reducing the time to exit trades (from 30 to six daysbetween July 2007 and March 2009) and increasing the
threshold for opening a trade (from 50 to 100 pips over thesame period) in essence adapting the system to the factthat larger, shorter-term moves were the best bet.
Walk-forward analysis offers a way to build a tradingstrategy without any parameter-selection bias. You can
evaluate a strategy over a long-term period using adefined set of rules for choosing parameters, removingmuch of the potential hindsight and curve-fitting inherent
in regular trading system creation. Using simple tradingtechniques, such as the one described here, and evaluatingthem through walk-forward analysis is an excellent way todetermine their level of robustness.yFor information on the author, see p. 4.
TABLE 2: PARAMETER RANGES
x(entry) y(exit)
Max. 150 49
Min. 50 1
Avg. 65 18Med. 60 15
Mode 50 6
Est. mode 50 9
Over time, the optimum value for the entry
parameter (x) was a little more stable than the
optimum exit parameter (y).
http://www.managedfuturestodaymag.com/ -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
22/3222 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
TRADING STRATEGIESADVANCED CONCEPTS
One of the cultural annoyances new traders have to over-
come is the difference between the interbank and Chicago
Mercantile Exchanges International Monetary Market
(IMM) conventions. The interbank market, with certain
prominent exceptions such as the Euro, British pound,
and both the Australian and New Zealand dollars, quotes
currencies in per USD terms. The IMM convention is to
quote everything in USD per terms.
One writer was told back in the 1970s the IMM conven-
tion was necessary for purposes of clearing and margining,
and this does, in fact, make sense: a customers account
could hold just a single currency, the U.S. dollar, and be
managed accordingly. A more cynical answer was prof-
fered in the 1980s: When currency futures started during
the early 1970s, the sentiment wasoverwhelmingly dollar-bearish,
and by quoting the futures in
terms that rose when the dollar
weakened, a bullish bet on the
yen or Deutsche mark would be
accompanied by a rising number
if successful.
Why the introduction? The
answer, for purposes of this
article, is simple: We will be dis-
cussing carry trade returns intothe dollar indexs six components
and summing those returns in
an index. Thus a successful bull-
ish bet on the dollar indexs
components will have a rising
number meaning a successful
bullish outlook on a dollar index
(DXY) position itself is expressed
as a bearish opinion on the DXY
and produces a lower number. A
higher carry return into the six
Decomposing the dollar index
Analyzing the DXY shows how all trades involve comparing alternatives and
those alternatives have to be accounted for on a complete cost basis.
BY HOWARD L. SIMONS
Of the dollar indexs six components, only the return into the British pound has been
significantly positive.
FIGURE 1: INTEREST-RATE SPREAD RETURN FOR DOLLAR INDEX
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
Jan-99
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Nov-01
May-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
Apr-04
Oct-04
Apr-05
Oct-05
Apr-06
Sep-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Mar-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Aug-09
Feb-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
January4,
1999=1
00
JPY
GBP
EUR
CHF
SEK
CAD
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
23/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 23
components and a lower DXY
index reading are two ways of
expressing the outcome, but
they can be confusing. As an
aside, futures traders who thinkof bonds in terms of price often
stumble when they enter the cash
market and are forced to think in
terms of yield.
Carry components
The dollar carry trade (see The
short, awful life of the dollar
carry trade, August 2008) can be
broken into two components: the
net interest-rate spread from bor-
rowing the USD and lending into
another currency, and the spot
rate return. Over time, the inter-
est-rate spread for high-yielding
currencies such as the Argentine
peso or Turkish lira can over-
whelm their negative spot rate
returns and make them good
investments for dollar-domiciled
investors.
Figure 1 shows the interest-
rate spread returns since theJanuary 1999 advent of the Euro.
Surprisingly, only the return into
the British pound has been signif-
icantly positive. (March 18, 2009,
the date when quantitative easing
began, is marked with a vertical
line in all accompanying charts.)
Now lets weight these spread
returns by the fixed weights of
the DXYs components, which
are: EUR 57.6 percent, JPY 13.6
The combined net interest-rate spread for borrowing the dollar and lending into the
DXY components has been negative over time.
FIGURE 2: INTEREST-RATE SPREAD RETURNFOR DOLLAR INDEX (INDEX-WEIGHTED)
52.5
55.0
57.5
60.0
62.5
65.0
67.5
70.0
72.5
75.0
77.5
80.0
82.5
85.0
87.5
90.0
92.5
95.0
97.5
100.0
102.5
Jan-99
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Nov-01
May-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
Apr-04
Oct-04
Apr-05
Oct-05
Apr-06
Sep-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Mar-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Aug-09
Feb-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Janua
ry
4,
1999=1
00
CHF
SEK
CAD
GBP
JPY
EUR
On an unweighted basis, five of the six components have gained on the USD over
time, with the GBP being the one exception.
FIGURE 3: SPOT RATE RETURN FOR DOLLAR INDEX COMPONENTS
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
Jan-99
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Nov-01
May-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
Apr-04
Oct-04
Apr-05
Oct-05
Apr-06
Sep-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Mar-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Aug-09
Feb-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Januar
y
4,
1999=
100
JPY
GBP
EUR
CHF
SEK
CAD
http://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Concepts -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
24/32
percent, GBP 11.9 percent, CAD
9.1 percent, SEK 4.2 percent, and
CHF 3.6 percent. The combined
net interest-rate spread for bor-
rowing the dollar and lendinginto the DXY components has
been negative over time, which is
hard to imagine today given the
Bernanke Federal Reserves mon-
ey-printing proclivities (Figure 2).
Figure 3 repeats the exercise
with the spot rate returns. On
an unweighted basis, five of the
six components have gained on
the USD over time, with the GBP
being the one exception.Once we apply the index
weights, the combined spot rate
return over time has been less
impressive than we have been
led to believe indeed, the peak
occurred just before the 2008
financial crisis hit (Figure 4).
Finally, lets re-integrate the
interest-rate spread and spot
rate components, first on an
unweighted basis (Figure 5) andlater on a weighted basis (Figure
6). While many believe the bet
against the dollar has been a one-
way affair for 40 years, the actual
economic return of going short
the dollar and long the six com-
ponents has been a struggle. By
September 2011, the net return on
the trade was about the same as it
was in November 2007.
ON THE MONEY
24 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
ADVANCED CONCEPTS
The actual economic return of going short the dollar and long the six components has
been a struggle.
FIGURE 5: EXCESS CARRY RETURN FOR DOLLAR INDEX COMPONENTS
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
Jan-99
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Nov-01
May-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
Apr-04
Oct-04
Apr-05
Oct-05
Apr-06
Sep-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Mar-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Aug-09
Feb-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Janua
ry
4,
1999
=1
00
JPY
GBP
EUR
CHF
SEK
CAD
Applying the index weights shows the combined spot rate return over time has been
less impressive than we have been led to believe.
FIGURE 4: SPOT RATE RETURN FOR DOLLARINDEX COMPONENTS (INDEX-WEIGHTED)
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
Jan-99
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Nov-01
May-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
Apr-04
Oct-04
Apr-05
Oct-05
Apr-06
Sep-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Mar-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Aug-09
Feb-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
Jan
uary
4,
1999
=
100
CHF
SEK
CAD
GBP
JPY
EUR
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
25/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 25
Net carry returns and
other markets
Finally, as many traders regard
the linkages between the DXY
and key commodity markets such
as crude oil or gold or between
the DXY and U.S. equities asconstant, lets look at the roll-
ing three-month correlations of
returns involved.
In the case of crude oil and
gold, we will use the Dow Jones-
UBS total return sub-indices for
each commodity; these include
the effects of roll yield and the
return on collateral. The correla-
tion of returns between the DXY
carry index constructed here andgold is not only much lower than
commonly believed, but it peaked
in April 2005 and has gone nega-
tive thrice since then. The DXY
and crude oil never had much of
a link between them prior to the
widespread adoption of long-
only commodity index trading
in the 2003-2004 time frame, and
that stands out in Figure 7.
If we repeat the exercise for
large- and small-capitalization
U.S. equities as measured by the
Russell 1000 and Russell 2000
indices, respectively, we see a
similar time-dependent relation-
ship (Figure 8). The carry returns
for the DXY against both stock
indices had been negative until
2004 and only climbed into
strongly positive ground during
and after 2009, with a prominent
By September 2011, the net return on the trade was about the same as it was in
November 2007.
FIGURE 6: EXCESS CARRY RETURN FOR DOLLAR INDEX COMPONENTS
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
Jan-99
Jun-99
Dec-99
Jun-00
Dec-00
Jun-01
Nov-01
May-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
Apr-04
Oct-04
Apr-05
Oct-05
Apr-06
Sep-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Mar-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Aug-09
Feb-10
Aug-10
Jan-11
Jul-11
January
4,
1999=
100
CHF
SEK
CAD
GBP
JPY
EUR
The correlation of returns between the DXY carry index and gold peaked in April 2005
and has gone negative three times since. The DXY and crude oil never had much of
a link prior to the widespread adoption of long-only commodity index trading in 2003-
2004.
FIGURE 7: THREE-MONTH ROLLING CORRELATION OF RETURNS:DXY VS. GOLD AND WEST TEXAS INTERMEDIATE
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Apr-99
Sep-99
Mar-00
Sep-00
Mar-01
Aug-01
Feb-02
Aug-02
Feb-03
Aug-03
Jan-04
Jul-04
Jan-05
Jul-05
Jan-06
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Nov-08
May-09
Nov-09
May-10
Nov-10
Apr-11
Oct-11
Correlation
Crude Oil
Gold
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
26/32
ON THE MONEY
26 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
ADVANCED CONCEPTS
detour to the downside during the QE2 era.
In all cases, traders should be careful about
assuming relationships where none may
exist outside of a momentary fashion in the
markets created by policies such as quantita-
tive easing or a stampede by institutions intovehicles such as long-only commodity index
funds.
Covering all bases
It is understandable so many traders look at
the spot rate return of going into the DXY
basket and never stop to ask, What is the
opportunity cost? Am I incurring net interest-
rate spread losses as part of this trade? Which
DXY components are contributing to what
aspects of the total return picture?While understandable, this is not excusable,
however. All trades involve the comparison of
alternatives, and those alternatives have to be
accounted for on a complete cost basis.y
For information on the author, see p. 4.
The carry returns for the DXY against both stock indices were negative until 2004 and only
climbed into strongly positive ground during and after 2009 (with a prominent downside detour
during the QE2 era).
FIGURE 8: THREE-MONTH ROLLING CORRELATION OF RETURNS:DXY VS. RUSSELL STOCK INDICES
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Apr-99
Sep-99
Mar-00
Sep-00
Mar-01
Aug-01
Feb-02
Aug-02
Feb-03
Aug-03
Jan-04
Jul-04
Jan-05
Jul-05
Jan-06
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
Jun-08
Nov-08
May-09
Nov-09
May-10
Nov-10
Apr-11
Oct-11
Correlation
Russell 2000
Russell 1000
http://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Conceptshttp://www.currencytradermag.com/index.php/c/Key_Concepts -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
27/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 27
http://www.ninjatrader.com/AThttp://www.ninjatrader.com/AThttp://www.ninjatrader.com/AT -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
28/3228 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
CPI: Consumer price index
ECB: European Central Bank
FDD(rstdeliveryday):Therst
day on which delivery of a com-modityinfulllmentofafutures
contract can take place.
FND(rstnoticeday):Also
knownasrstintentday,thisis
therstdayonwhichaclear-nghouse can give notice to abuyer of a futures contract that itntends to deliver a commodity in
fulllmentofafuturescontract.
The clearinghouse also informsthe seller.
FOMC: Federal Open MarketCommittee
GDP: Gross domestic product
ISM: Institute for supplymanagement
LTD(lasttradingday):Thenal
day trading can take place in a
futures or options contract.
PMI: Purchasing managers index
PPI: Producer price index
Economic Releaserelease (U.S.) time (ET)
GDP 8:30 a.m.
CPI 8:30 a.m.
ECI 8:30 a.m.
PPI 8:30 a.m.
SM 10:00 a.m.
Unemployment 8:30 a.m.
Personal income 8:30 a.m.
Durable goods 8:30 a.m.Retail sales 8:30 a.m.
Trade balance 8:30 a.m.
Leading indicators 10:00 a.m.
GLOBAL ECONOMIC CALENDAR
December
1U.S.: November ISM manufacturingreportFrance: Q3employmentreport
2U.S.: November employment reportCanada: November employmentreport
3
45
6Canada: Bank of Canada interest-rate announcementBrazil: Q3GDP
7 Australia: Q3GDPBrazil: November PPI
8
Australia: November employmentreportBrazil: November CPIMexico: NovemberPPIandNov.30CPIUK: Bank of England interest-rate
announcementECB: Governing council interest-rateannouncement
9
U.S.: October trade balanceGermany: November CPIUK: November PPILTD: December forex options;December U.S. dollar index options(ICE)
10
11
12 Japan: November PPI
13
U.S.: November retail sales and
FOMC interest-rate announcementFrance: November CPIHong Kong: Q3PPIUK: November CPI
14India: November PPISouth Africa: November CPIUK: November employment report
15 South Africa: November PPIU.S.: November PPI
16 U.S.: November CPI
17
18
19
Hong Kong: Sept.-Nov. employmenreportLTD: December forex futures;December U.S. dollar index futures(ICE)
20
Canada: November CPIGermany: November PPIHong Kong: November CPIJapan: Bank of Japan interest-rateannouncement
21FDD: December forex futures;December U.S. dollar index futures(ICE)
22
U.S.: Q3GDPandNovemberleading indicatorsBrazil: November employmentreportMexico: November employmentreportandDec.15CPIUK: Q3GDP
23
U.S.: November personal incomeand durable ordersFrance: Q3GDPandNovember
PPI24
25
26
27
28 Japan: November employmentreport and CPI
29
30 India: November CPI
January
1
2
3
U.S.: December ISM manufacturingreportGermany: November employmentreport
4
5 Canada: November PPI
6
U.S.: December employment reportBrazil: December CPILTD: January forex options; JanuaryU.S. dollar index options (ICE)
The information on this page is sub-
ect to change. Currency Traderis
not responsible for the accuracy of
calendar dates beyond press time.
Event: The World MoneyShow OrlandoDate:Feb.9-12Location: Gaylord Palms ResortFor more information: Go to www.moneyshow.com/trade-show/orlando/world_moneyShow/?scode=013104
Event: The International Traders Expo New YorkDate:Feb.19-22Location: Marriott Marquis Hotel, New YorkFor more information:Click here.
Event: CBOE Risk Management ConferencDate:March11-13Location: Hyatt Regency Coconut Point Resort and Spa atBonita Springs, Fla.For more information: Go to www.cboermc.com
Event: The International Traders Expo LondonDate:March23-24Location: Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, LondonFor more information:Click here.
EVENTS
http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/orlando/world_moneyShow/?scode=013104http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/orlando/world_moneyShow/?scode=013104http://www.moneyshow.com/TradeShow/New_york/traders_expo/main.asp?scode=025598http://www.moneyshow.com/TradeShow/New_york/traders_expo/main.asp?scode=025598http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/london/traders_expo/?scode=025598http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/london/traders_expo/?scode=025598http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/london/traders_expo/?scode=025598http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/london/traders_expo/?scode=025598http://www.moneyshow.com/TradeShow/New_york/traders_expo/main.asp?scode=025598http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/orlando/world_moneyShow/?scode=013104http://www.moneyshow.com/tradeshow/orlando/world_moneyShow/?scode=013104 -
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
29/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 29
CURRENCY FUTURES SNAPSHOT as of Nov. 29
The information does NOT constitute trade
signals. It is intended only to provide a brief
synopsis of each markets liquidity, direction,
and levels of momentum and volatility. See
the legend for explanations of the different
fields. Note: Average volume and open
interest data includes both pit and side-by-
side electronic contracts (where applicable).
LEGEND:
Volume: 30-day average daily volume, in
thousands.
OI: 30-day open interest, in thousands.
10-day move: The percentage price move
from the close 10 days ago to todays close.20-day move: The percentage price move
from the close 20 days ago to todays close.
60-day move: The percentage price move
from the close 60 days ago to todays close.
The % rank fields for each time window
(10-day moves, 20-day moves, etc.) show
the percentile rank of the most recent move
to a certain number of the previous moves of
the same size and in the same direction. For
example, the % rank for the 10-day move
shows how the most recent 10-day move
compares to the past twenty 10-day moves;
for the 20-day move, it shows how the most
recent 20-day move compares to the pastsixty 20-day moves; for the 60-day move,
it shows how the most recent 60-day move
compares to the past one-hundred-twenty
60-day moves. A reading of 100% means
the current reading is larger than all the past
readings, while a reading of 0% means the
current reading is smaller than the previous
readings.
Volatility ratio/% rank: The ratio is the short-
term volatility (10-day standard deviation
of prices) divided by the long-term volatility
(100-day standard deviation of prices). The
% rank is the percentile rank of the volatility
ratio over the past 60 days.
BarclayHedge Rankings:Top 10 currency traders managing more than $10 million
(as of Oct. 31 ranked by October 2011 return)
Trading advisorOctoberreturn
2011 YTDreturn
$ Undermgmt.
(millions)
1. Silva Capital Mgmt (Cap. Partners) 13.08% -10.84% 16.3
2. MIGFX Inc (Retail) 10.74% 73.78% 45.0
3. CenturionFx Ltd (6X) 5.51% 32.50% 19.5
4. Regium Asset Mgmt (Ultra Curr) 4.07% 22.66% 36.65. Gedamo (FX Alpha) 3.99% 23.18% 18.8
6. ACT Currency Partner AG 2.07% 18.69% 20.0
7. Cambridge Strategy (Emerging Mkts) 1.74% 1.90% 90.0
8. IPM Global Currency Fund (C) 1.37% -5.36% 174.0
9. Olsen (Olsen Invest - AF) 1.18% 7.89% 30.0
10. Gain Capital Mgmt (MAC 4X) 0.98% 0.74% 27.6
Top 10 currency traders managing less than $10M & more than $1M
1. Adantia (FX Aggressive) 7.23% 35.47% 1.7
2. Iron Fortress FX Mgmt 6.90% 46.11% 3.2
3.Greenwave Capital Mgmt (GDS Beta)
4.76% 3.14%4.0
4. Valhalla Capital Group (Intl AB) 4.37% 29.92% 2.1
5. Armytage AAM (Asian Currency) 3.39% -9.70% 2.3
6. Four Capital (FX) 2.53% 2.71% 1.8
7. BEAM (FX Prop) 2.40% 0.43% 2.0
8. Blue Fin Capital (Managed FX) 1.40% 3.58% 9.3
9. Basu and Braun (Everest) 1.14% 4.36% 1.9
10. Halion Capital (Conservative) 0.98% 29.10% 6.5
Based on estimates of the composite of all accounts or the fully funded subset method.
Does not reflect the performance of any single account.
PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Market Sym Exch Vol OI10-day
move / rank
20-day
move / rank
60-day
move / rank
Volatility
ratio / rank
EUR/USD EC CME 315.7 237.5 -2.06%/53% -4.24%/55% -6.02%/87% .29/10%
AUD/USD AD CME 133.7 133.1 -1.25%/13% -5.03%/54% -5.82%/70% .44/32%
GBP/USD BP CME 97.2 163.3 -1.79%/62% -3.25%/49% -3.72%/87% .41/50%
JPY/USD JY CME 82.4 148.4 -1.06%/8% 0.13%/13% -1.49%/84% .49/87%
CAD/USD CD CME 79.1 117.7 -1.18%/33% -3.46%/56% -4.45%/69% .31/23%
MXN/USD MP CME 34.3 91.5 -2.82%/60% -4.92%/50% -10.90%/69% .23/43%
U.S. dollar index DX ICE 27.8 60.0 1.40%/29% 2.28%/37% 4.07%/65% .30/12%
CHF/USD SF CME 23.9 27.3 -1.33%/13% -5.14%/48% -14.33%/95% .07/0%
NZD/USD NE CME 6.1 25.3 -1.87%/25% -5.97%/60% -9.90%/89% .30/13%
E-Mini EUR/USD ZE CME 5.6 6.2 -2.06%/53% -4.24%/55% -6.02%/87% .29/10%
Note: Average volume and open interest data includes both pit and side-by-side electronic contracts (where applicable). Price activity is
based on pit-traded contracts.
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
30/32
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
30 December2011CURRENCY TRADER
CURRENCIES (vs. U.S. DOLLAR)
Rank CurrencyNov. 28
price vs.U.S. dollar
1-monthgain/loss
3-monthgain/loss
6-monthgain/loss
52-weekhigh
52-weeklow
Previous
1 Hong Kong dollar 0.128265 -0.33% -0.01% -0.18% 0.1288 0.1281 15
2 Chinese yuan 0.156605 -0.34% -0.08% 1.66% 0.1578 0.1496 123 Taiwan dollar 0.032875 -1.10% -4.59% -5.04% 0.03510 0.0321 14
4 Japanese yen 0.01287 -2.24% -1.30% 4.29% 0.0132 0.0117 13
5 Thai baht 0.03186 -2.37% -4.55% -3.28% 0.0336 0.0314 16
6 Great Britain pound 1.54446 -3.63% -5.64% -6.04% 1.6702 1.5407 5
7 Russian ruble 0.031615 -4.27% -8.94% -11.11% 0.0366 0.0306 3
8 Singapore dollar 0.76169 -4.38% -8.37% -5.69% 0.832 0.7572 10
9 Canadian dollar 0.95553 -4.71% -6.22% -6.61% 1.059 0.9467 11
10 Indian rupee 0.019055 -5.46% -12.09% -13.76% 0.0226 0.0189 17
11 Euro 1.3246 -5.65% -8.64% -6.91% 1.4842 1.2901 7
12 Swiss franc 1.075735 -6.20% -13.26% -7.72% 1.3779 0.996 913 Brazilian real 0.529855 -7.58% -14.74% -14.53% 0.65 0.5288 2
14 Australian Dollar 0.97196 -8.08% -8.07% -8.96% 1.1028 0.9478 1
15 Swedish krona 0.14274 -8.10% -10.15% -10.22% 0.1662 0.1422 4
16 South African rand 0.11732 -8.21% -16.13% -18.66% 0.1518 0.1166 8
17 New Zealand dollar 0.741105 -8.60% -11.74% -9.12% 0.8797 0.7207 6
GLOBAL STOCK INDICES
Country Index Nov. 281-monthgain/loss
3-monthgain/loss
6-monthgain loss
52-weekhigh
52-weeklow Previo
1 Mexico IPC 35,558.18 -3.13% 1.55% -0.23% 38,876.80 31,659.30 8
2 South Africa FTSE/JSE All Share 31,829.34 -3.24% 5.07% -1.73% 32,894.11 28,391.18 10
3 Switzerland Swiss Market 5,522.70 -5.64% 1.40% -14.65% 6,739.10 4,695.30 12
4 Brazil Bovespa 56,017.00 -5.87% 2.11% -12.41% 71,924.00 47,793.00 11
5 Australia All ordinaries 4,125.80 -6.47% -4.80% -13.07% 5,069.50 3,829.40 5
6 UK FTSE 100 5,312.80 -6.83% 0.84% -11.31% 6,105.80 4,791.00 6
7 Canada S&P/TSX composite 11,640.21 -7.02% -6.91% -15.83% 14,329.50 10,848.20 15
8 U.S. S&P500 1,192.55 -7.20% -1.45% -11.35% 1,370.58 1,074.77 9
9 Singapore Straits Times 2,694.43 -7.27% -0.25% -14.73% 3,280.77 2,521.95 14
0 Japan Nikkei225 8,287.49 -8.43% -6.37% -12.81% 10,891.60 8,135.79 13
1 India BSE30 16,167.13 -9.20% -1.52% -11.33% 20,664.80 15,478.70 7
2 Germany Xetra Dax 5,745.33 -9.47% 1.33% -19.76% 7,600.41 4,965.80 2
3 Hong Kong Hang Seng 18,037.81 -9.90% -9.20% -22.20% 24,468.60 16,170.30 4
4 France CAC 40 3,012.93 -10.02% -4.48% -23.58% 4,169.87 2,693.21 3
5 Italy FTSE MIB 14,578.23 -12.46% -3.72% -29.88% 23,273.80 13,115.00
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
31/32CURRENCY TRADERDecember2011 31
NON-U.S. DOLLAR FOREX CROSS RATES
ank Currency pair Symbol Nov. 281-monthgain/loss
3-monthgain/loss
6-monthgain loss
52-weekhigh
52-weeklow
Previou
1 Yen / Real JPY/BRL 0.024285 5.75% 15.75% 22.00% 0.0246 0.0186 21
2 Pound / Aussie $ GBP/AUD 1.589015 4.83% 2.64% 3.21% 1.6373 1.4806 18
3 Canada $ / Real CAD/BRL 1.8034 3.11% 10.00% 9.26% 1.8282 1.5997 20
4 Pound / Franc GBP/CHF 1.43593 2.76% 8.80% 1.84% 1.5639 1.1778 13
5 Euro / Aussie $ EUR/AUD 1.36319 2.66% -0.60% 2.28% 1.4228 1.2947 19
6 Euro / Real EUR/BRL 2.49996 2.09% 7.16% 8.91% 2.5367 2.1692 17
7 Pound / Canada $ GBP/CAD 1.616335 1.13% 0.62% 0.62% 1.6354 1.5302 10
8 Euro / Franc EUR/CHF 1.23223 0.67% 5.41% 0.95% 1.3283 1.0376 15
9 Aussie $ / New Zeal $ AUD/NZD 1.311485 0.57% 4.17% 0.18% 1.3746 1.2354 4
10 Aussie $ / Real AUD/BRL 1.83441 -0.54% 7.83% 6.51% 1.8452 1.6066 12
11 Euro / Canada $ EUR/CAD 1.386245 -0.99% -2.58% -0.32% 1.4316 1.2811 11
12 Pound / Yen GBP/JPY 120.04 -1.39% -4.37% -9.88% 139.19 117.7 5
13 Franc / Canada $ CHF/CAD 1.1258 -1.57% -7.50% -1.18% 1.3569 1.0124 14
14 Aussie $ / Franc AUD/CHF 0.90353 -2.00% 5.98% -1.35% 0.9749 0.7477 3
15 Euro / Pound EUR/GBP 0.85739 -2.12% -3.20% -0.96% 0.9038 0.8297 16
16 Canada $ / Yen CAD/JPY 74.25 -2.51% -4.99% -10.45% 88.95 72.63 9
17 Euro / Yen EUR/JPY 102.95 -3.46% -9.04% -10.72% 122.63 101.41 7
18 Aussie $ / Canada $ AUD/CAD 1.017195 -3.53% -1.97% -2.51% 1.0612 0.9708 2
19 Franc / Yen CHF/JPY 83.600 -4.04% -12.11% -11.50% 105.79 82.68 8
20 Aussie $ / Yen AUD/JPY 75.41 -6.10% -6.96% -12.84% 89.46 72.72 1
21 New Zeal $ / Yen NZD/JPY 57.59 -6.49% -10.59% -12.85% 67.97 56.86 6
GLOBAL CENTRAL BANK LENDING RATES
Country Interest rate Rate Last change May 2011 Nov 2010
United States Fed funds rate 0-0.25 0.5(Dec.08) 0-0.25 0-0.25
Japan Overnight call rate 0-0.1 0-0.1 (Oct. 10) 0-0.1 0-0.1
Eurozone Refi rate 1.25 0.25(Nov11) 1.25 1
England Repo rate 0.5 0.5(March09) 0.5 0.5Canada Overnight rate 1 0.25(Sept10) 1 1
Switzerland 3-monthSwissLibor 0 0.25(Aug11) 0.25 0.25
Australia Cash rate 4.5 0.25(Nov11) 4.75 4.75
New Zealand Cash rate 2.5 0.5(March11) 2.5 3
Brazil Selic rate 11 0.5(Nov11) 12 10.75
Korea Korea base rate 3.25 0.25(June11) 3 2.5
Taiwan Discount rate 1.875 0.125(June11) 1.75 1.5
India Repo rate 8.5 0.25(Oct11) 7.25 6.25
South Africa Repurchase rate 5.5 0.5(Nov.10) 5.5 5.5
-
8/2/2019 Ctm 201112
32/32
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
GDP Period Release date Change 1-year change Next release
AMERICAS
Argentina Q2 9/16 26.1% 20.1% 12/16
Brazil Q2 9/6 8.7% 9.0% 12/6
Canada Q3 11/30 1.1% 5.9% 3/2
EUROPE
France Q2 9/28 0.4% 3.2% 12/23
Germany Q3 11/15 0.8% 2.5% 2/15
UK Q2 10/5 0.5% 4.5% 12/22
AFRICA S. Africa Q3 11/29 2.7% 10.8% 2/28
ASIA and S.PACIFIC
Australia Q2 9/7 2.7% 6.3% 12/7
Hong Kong Q3 11/11 6.5% 4.3% 2/1
India Q3 11/30 1.0% 16.0% 2/29
Japan Q3 11/14 3.4% 14.5% 2/13
Singapore Q3 11/25 2.0% 6.1% 2/24
Unemployment Period Release date Rate Change 1-year change Next release
AMERICAS
Argentina Q3 11/21 7.2% -0.1% -0.3% 2/22
Brazil Oct. 11/24 5.8%