cultural and legal change in the vietnam era
DESCRIPTION
Cultural and Legal Change in the Vietnam Era. Cultural and Legal Change in the Vietnam Era. Counter Culture Warren and Burger Courts Supreme Court Decisions. Why the Counterculture?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CULTURAL AND LEGAL CHANGE IN THE VIETNAM ERA
CULTURAL AND LEGAL CHANGE IN THE VIETNAM ERA Counter Culture Warren and Burger Courts Supreme Court Decisions
WHY THE COUNTERCULTURE? The 1960s saw a widening of the generation
gap. Young Americans were not satisfied with the values of their parents
They were disillusioned by the discovery that American society was not free of racism, sexism, imperialism, and oppression
The baby-boom generation was now graduating from high school and moving into college
Many students regarded the war as American imperialism. Others thought that it was a civil war that should be left for the Vietnamese to fight alone
3 P’s – youthful population bulge, protest against racism and the Vietnam War, and the apparent permanence of prosperity
COUNTERCULTURE Many Americans in the 1960s began to look
for alternatives to traditional patterns of living. Young people, in particular, adopted values that ran counter to, or against, the mainstream culture. This is called the counterculture
People’s appearances reflected the social changes that were taking place. Hippies – people who were “hip,” or aware of the latest styles - wanted to look different. They wore blue jeans with bell bottoms, T-shirts, and had long hair, sideburns, and beards
THE SEXUAL REVOLUTION Partly caused by the introduction of the birth-
control pill Led to more open discussion of sexual
subjects. Newspapers, magazines, and books published articles that might not have been printed a few years earlier
More and more people simply lived together as couples, without getting married
Increased worries in the 1980s about sexually transmitted disease like genital herpes and AIDS slowed, but didn’t reverse, the sexual revolution
DRUGS Many members of the counterculture turned
to psychedelic drugs. These powerful chemicals cause the brain to behave abnormally. Users of these drugs experience hallucinations and other altered perceptions of reality
Marijuana and LSD use became widespread The possibility of death from an overdose or
from an accident while under the influence of drugs became much greater than before
CHURCHES DECLINE The weekly churchgoing rate declined from
48% in the late 1950s, to 41% in the early 1970s
Protestant denominations suffered the most Educated Americans became more secular,
while the less educated became more religious
Catholics changed some of their traditions:Stopped Latin languageMeatless Fridays were done away withNo Gregorian chants
FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT In September 1964 at
the University of California at Berkeley, students became angry when the administration refused to allow them to distribute antiwar leaflets outside the main campus. However, the students distributed the leaflets anyhow
The university decided to hold student leaders responsible for their actions and filed charges against them
In December 1964, thousands of students protested. 700 were arrested
The agitation at Berkeley spread to other campuses across the U.S.
WOODSTOCK MUSIC AND ART FAIR In New York in 1969, 400,000 members of the
counterculture came together For 4 days, people sat and listened to bands
playing. Police avoided confrontations at the Woodstock festival by choosing not to enforce drug laws
The people who attended recalled the event with something of a sense of awe for the fellowship they experienced there
END OF THE COUNTERCULTURE?
Ended because:They had grown olderHad children of their ownCivil rights movement endedThe war endedEconomic stagnation beganNeeded a job in the system
CULTURAL AND LEGAL CHANGE IN THE VIETNAM ERA Counter Culture Warren and Burger Courts Supreme Court Decisions
THREE BRANCHES (REVIEW) Executive – President Legislative – Congress Judicial – Supreme Court and Lesser Courts
POWER TO MAKE THE COURTS (REVIEW) "The judicial power of the United States, shall
be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”
-U.S. Constitution
Judiciary Act of 1789 and 1801 Organized federal judiciary Supreme Court = Six Members
John Jay became first Chief Justice Established federal courts in each state Authorized the Supreme Court to review state
court decisions
JUDICIARY ACT (REVIEW)
FEDERAL JUDICIARY TODAY (REVIEW)
SUPREME COURT (REVIEW) Supreme Court
consists of 9 supreme court justices.
The head of the Supreme Court is the Chief Justice
APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT (REVIEW) Presidents have the constitutional power to
nominate Supreme Court Justices. Senate approves Supreme Court nominees Members of the Supreme Court are
appointed for life.
DUTY OF THE SUPREME COURT (REVIEW) Marbury v. Madison:
Established Judicial Review. The Role of the judicial branch to evaluate the constitutionality of legislative and executive branches.
WARREN AND BURGER COURTS Chief Justice Earl
Warren Appointed by
Eisenhower Served 1953-1969
WARREN AND BURGER COURTS Chief Justice Earl
Warren Appointed by
Eisenhower Served 1953-1969
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Appointed Nixon Served 1969-1986
CULTURAL AND LEGAL CHANGE IN THE VIETNAM ERA Counter Culture Warren and Burger Courts Supreme Court Decisions
RELIGION
ENGEL V. VITALE (1962) Held that a prayer created by the New York
State Board of Regents was unconstitutional Even though this prayer was “non-
denominational,” the Court held that state-sponsored prayer of any type went against the First Amendment’s separation of church and State
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP V. SCHEMPP (1963) Over whether a State pass a law requiring
each public school day to begin with readings from the Bible
The Supreme Court said no because public schools cannot sponsor religious exercises
DUE PROCESS
GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT (1963) Supreme Court held that all persons charged
with a felony (later expanded to other charges) must be provided legal counsel
ESCOBEDO V. ILLINOIS (1964) Supreme Court held that the police must
honor a person’s request to have an attorney present during interrogation
MIRANDA V. ARIZONA (1966) The Supreme Court provided an arrested
person with the right to:Remain silentBe told that whatever he said could be
used against himTo be represented by an attorneyTo have a lawyer even if he could not
afford oneTo one phone call to obtain a lawyer
FURMAN V. GEORGIA (1972) The Supreme Court ruled that the death
penalty was unconstitutional unless fairly applied (judges and juries were given too much discretion in deciding the death penalty)
To apply the death penalty fairly, there must first be a trial to settle the issue of guilt or innocence and a second hearing to decide whether the circumstances justify a sentence of death
CIVIL RIGHTS
HEART OF ATLANTA MOTEL V. U.S. (1964) A motel operator refused to serve an African
American customer The Supreme Court upheld the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination in schools, places of work, voting sites, public accommodations, and public areas
GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT (1965) The Supreme Court struck down a State law
that prohibited the use of contraceptives, even among married couples
The Court proclaimed a “right of privacy.”
ROE V. WADE Many states outlawed or severely restricted
access to abortion. In 1973, the Supreme Court legalized
abortion. The justices based their decision on a constitutional right to personal privacy (in the 14th Amendment) and struck down state regulation of abortion in the first three months of pregnancy