culture in construction (2009)

47
Culture in Construction Culture in Construction Associate Professor Dr John Tookey Associate Professor Dr John Tookey

Upload: toughtoget

Post on 21-Nov-2014

113 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Culture in Construction (2009)

Culture in Construction Culture in Construction Associate Professor Dr John TookeyAssociate Professor Dr John Tookey

Page 2: Culture in Construction (2009)

What is Culture?

• What we are and what we do as a society• The way people understand their world and

make sense of it• A shared system of meanings, relative,

learned, about groups

Page 3: Culture in Construction (2009)

• There is not “right or wrong” in culture• Defining one culture or another as superior is

dangerous – corporate or political fascism.

• It is not (biologically) inherited• It is not about individual behaviours

• It is an evolving concept• Used across industries• Used within organizations• In diverse situations –from projects to processes

Page 4: Culture in Construction (2009)

• Culture is a perspective that can help us to understand more about a business.

• 'Business culture' is not how others see a business, but also about how the individuals within an organisation understand it.

• In this unit we explore how the concept of culture developed from research into differences between cultures at a national level. It is possible to see, or ‘feel’, that one business is different from another, and that this involves more than just how it presents itself to the outside world.

Page 5: Culture in Construction (2009)

Why do we study ‘business cultures’?

• Culture is a metaphor which can be used to explore the identity of a business.

• It is about how others see the business, but also how the individuals who work there understand it.

• Culture offers us an insight into the business and what it is like to work within it.

Page 6: Culture in Construction (2009)

ActivityActivity 1 (10 mins)• Purpose: to consider business practices in different cultural

contexts.• Task: consider each item in the following list. In your country's

culture, is this behaviour considered to be acceptable or not?– Paying an agent for an introduction to a business opportunity. – Paying a government agent for bureaucratic procedures to be

bypassed or speeded up. – Making a copy of a product that you have seen at an international

trade fair. – Paying people to find loopholes in tax laws. – Giving gifts to the purchasing manager in a large business

organisation. – Charging high interest rates for unsecured loans to individuals.

Page 7: Culture in Construction (2009)

National cultures• Hofstede's five Cultural Dimensions• A series of perspectives that we might use to achieve a different

insight into business was introduced by Morgan (1986) in his book entitled Images of an Organization.

• One of these was the business as a culture, a type of micro-society where people work and ‘live’ together on a daily basis, with certain rules and understandings about what is acceptable and what is not.

• Idea of a business culture came from Hofstede on national cultures (1980). His research focused on ways of measuring national culture and how these ‘measures’ might work differently in different contexts.

• Cultural values important in a national culture, he suggested, could be reflected in the way businesses within that country are operated and organised.

Page 8: Culture in Construction (2009)

Hofstede's five dimensions

• Developed four in 1980, then added a fifth in 1991

• Power distance• Individualism/collectivism• Masculinity/femininity• Uncertainty avoidance• Confucian/dynamism

Page 9: Culture in Construction (2009)

Power distance• Concerns the extent to which less powerful members of

organisations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally.

• National cultures that demonstrated what Hofstede called a ‘low power distance’ are ones in which there is a concern to minimise inequalities.

• Hofstede included Sweden and NZ as examples of this. • Hofstede found that Latin American and Latin European (France

and Spain) countries had higher power distance scores - less powerful in these societies look to those with power to make decisions, and inequalities within society are more acceptable. This is represented by a tendency for the centralisation of power and the subordination of those with less power within businesses.

Page 10: Culture in Construction (2009)

Power distance

Page 11: Culture in Construction (2009)

Individualism/collectivism• In an individualistic society, people are expected to

look after themselves and their families. • In business - employment contracts based on hiring

and firing. • Two examples of countries with high scores on this

dimension were Australia and Canada. • In collective societies, people are concerned for others

and the culture is based around more cohesive groups, such as the family, which offer protection in exchange for loyalty. – Hofstede cites Ecuador and Indonesia as examples of more

collective societies.

Page 12: Culture in Construction (2009)

Individualism/collectivism

Page 13: Culture in Construction (2009)

Masculinity/femininity• Degree to which gender roles are distinct and adhered to within a

society. • In high femininity societies, social gender roles overlap, with both

men and women valuing ‘feminine’ qualities • Modesty, • Intuition• Quality of life

• ‘Masculine’ qualities definied by• Aggression• Competition.

• Hofstede's research indicated Denmark and the Netherlands were more feminine cultures.

• USA was ranked fifteenth out of 53 nations on this masculinity score. Japan, the UK and West Germany also scored highly on masculine values.

Page 14: Culture in Construction (2009)

Masculinity/femininity

Page 15: Culture in Construction (2009)

Uncertainty avoidance• This concerns the extent to which the members of a

society feel threatened by uncertain and unknown situations. Hofstede suggested that Jamaica and Singapore were relatively low uncertainty avoidance cultures, where precision and punctuality are less important, innovation is encouraged and people are motivated by being esteemed by, or belonging to, others above other things. High uncertainty avoidance scores mean that there is a fear of ambiguous situations, a preference for being busy and being precise and punctual. Relatively high scores on this dimension were found for Latin American and Latin European countries, Japan and South Korea.

Page 16: Culture in Construction (2009)

Uncertainty avoidance

Page 17: Culture in Construction (2009)

Confucian/dynamism• This refers to the extent to which long-termism or short-termism

appears to be the dominant approach. • Long-termism stresses perseverance and being sparing with

resources. • Short-termism involves emphasis on quick results. • Hofstede found USA was short-termist, while the Netherlands was

the most long-termist European nation, ranked tenth out of 23 countries surveyed.

• Differences between national cultures are based in deep-rooted values and so are largely implicit rather than openly acknowledged.

• They create all sorts of problems for employees in multinational companies who go to work abroad, or for representatives doing business with suppliers or customers in other countries. We can use the simple activity below to explore some of these differences.

Page 18: Culture in Construction (2009)

Confucian/dynamism

Page 19: Culture in Construction (2009)

Hofstede’s influence• Hofstede is highly influential on how we think about the

cultures of businesses in different countries. • People expect different things and operate in different

ways in business and other organisations because of underlying societal values.

• Hofstede gives insight into what we might expect when we do business in other places- important for globalisation.

• Of course, there are always exceptions to the rule. • Some businesses succeed because of their very ‘difference’:

individuals are often attracted to work for businesses that seem ‘different’, and some customers prefer to shop there.

Page 20: Culture in Construction (2009)

Fons Trompenaars

• 1. Universalism vs. particularism – What is more important, rules or relationships?

• 2. Individualism vs. collectivism (communitarianism) – Do we function in a group or as individuals?

• 3. Neutral vs. emotional (Do we display our emotions?

• 4. Specific vs. diffuse – Is responsibility specifically assigned or diffusely accepted?

• 5. Achievement vs. ascription– Do we have to prove ourselves to receive status or is it given to us?

• 6. Sequential vs. synchronic – Do we do things one at a time or several things at once?

• 7. Internal vs. external control – Do we control our environment or are we controlled by it?

Trompenaars and Charles Hampden-Turner developed a model of culture with 7 dimensions – 5 covering the ways in which human beings deal with each other, 1 dealing with societies over time and 1 with culture and environment

Page 21: Culture in Construction (2009)

Implications for construction

Page 22: Culture in Construction (2009)

Working in different cultures• Working abroad is often considered the chance of a lifetime. Living and working in a foreign country with all

expenses paid; what more could anyone want? In a surprising number of cases the answer is actually: ‘Quite a lot’. Finding yourself adrift in a different culture might seem exciting when you're on holiday, but it's an entirely different proposition when you're living and working. Codes of business practice may be radically different and the expatriate lifestyle can be lonely… yet many multinational companies have made little effort to prepare their employees for the shock.

• The advertising giant J Walter Thompson is a case in point. ‘We call in global relocation specialists to handle the practicalities of moving home and children's education,’ says a company spokesman. ‘But most other things we leave to the individual. The people we send abroad are experienced international businessmen and women and we expect them to understand different cultural milieus. There will always be the odd problem but we would hope that these could be dealt with by our local staff.’…

• But even with strong and knowledgeable support in the new country Chris Crosby, managing director of TMA, a company that specialises in corporate cross-cultural changes, believes more is required.

• ‘Most people can identify explicit differences, such as clothing and food, which separate their culture from another and have little difficulty in adapting,’ he says. ‘More implicit differences are far harder to deal with. In the UK a business meeting is perceived as a place where a plan of action will be formulated and implemented. In other cultures, it is often just a forum for discussion. If you go abroad with the UK model as a preconception you might think that a meeting had been a disaster when it hadn't.’

• ‘Rather than getting people to adopt a different culture than their own, you have to help them adapt their own style to a new culture. Critical to this is understanding one's own culture. Without examining our own underlying perceptions it is unlikely we will get to grips with another,’ Mr. Crosby says.

• But people are unpredictable and not all cross-cultural situations are cut and dried; many are ambiguous, so a key element of successful working practice is to concentrate on building relationships. ‘Your job is to do the right thing for the business,’ he says firmly. You need to be clear about non-negotiables, ethically and in terms of business operations.’

• (Source: Crace, 2000)

Page 23: Culture in Construction (2009)

• Activity 2• Task: can you think of any examples where a

business you have worked for, or heard about, has tried to operate in a slightly different way from what you would expect? List any examples you can think of and make some notes on how it looked or felt different, and why.

Page 24: Culture in Construction (2009)

Culture as Socialisation• Culture is a pattern of beliefs and expectations

shared by the organisational members. These beliefs and expectations produce norms that powerfully shape the behaviour of individuals and groups within the organisation.

• Schwartz and Davis, 1981, p. 33• Central idea about organisational culture - has to

be learnt by newcomers• Takes time to understand.

• Socialisation describes how employees learn what is acceptable and what is not.

Page 25: Culture in Construction (2009)

Case Study:- Disney• Opened 1955 in Anaheim, California• Disneyland consistent money maker for Walt Disney Enterprises. • If you apply you have to conform to rules - theme park is the

‘Happiest Place on Earth’….. Or else!• Ride operators and other hourly paid employees are a well-

screened and fairly homogeneous group: • white males and females, • early twenties, • above average height• without facial blemish• “radiating” good health.

• Ethnic minorities are employed, apart from colour they tend to be close copies of the standard Disneyland employee.

Page 26: Culture in Construction (2009)

Case Study:- Disney• New recruits enrolled at University of Disneyland to undergo 48hr apprenticeship programme. • Employees learn history and philosophy of Disneyland, and regulations and procedures that govern

work there. • Use of language crucial

– employees are generally on first name terms– customers must be referred to as ‘guests’– rides are called ‘attractions’– Disneyland itself is a ‘park’ not an amusement centre. – Employees are encouraged to think of themselves as ‘back-stage’, ‘on-stage’, and ‘staging’ and their

uniforms as ‘costumes’. – Instruction covers approved responses to probable questions ride operators face from customers - how to

summon assistance when accidents (aka ‘incidents’) arise or particularly difficult ‘guests’ cannot be mollified. • Curriculum inculcates values like

– ‘the customer is king’ – ‘everyone is a child at heart when at Disneyland’.

• Checklists of appearance standards that must be learned, and which ban the wearing of facial hair, fancy jewellery or more than very modest amounts of make-up.

• Motivation levels hyped by inspirational films, and pep talks exhort employees to be happy and cheerful while ‘onstage’. What is more, all relevant essential information is contained in a training manual, so no one can forget.

Page 27: Culture in Construction (2009)

Case Study:- Disney• Socialisation mechanisms are equally well developed. • New recruits learn the job they are assigned to, the costume they are allocated,

and the area of the park in which they work, determine their social status. • More highly skilled the work and glamorous the costume, the higher an

individual's status. • Employees learn strict limits to which the company line has to be taken seriously,

and there is much satirical banter about the artificiality of Disneyland. • Individuals realise supervisors are not just there to help them, but to monitor and

evaluate their performance: most old hands can be counted on to relate tales of employees who have been fired for taking too long a break, not wearing part of the official uniform, or providing longer than usual rides.

– Employees are taught by their peers how to get back at misbehaving ‘guests’ by tightening seat belts, slamming on the brakes unexpectedly, and drenching those standing on the banks of rivers.

• All are carefully scrutinised, and those deemed not to ‘fit’ are the subject of gossip and/or ostracism.

Page 28: Culture in Construction (2009)

Case Study:- Disney• The formal and informal socialisation procedures

are not just fascinating to observe but commercially effective. Employees are generally willing to play the roles expected of them with good humour and kindly smiles, and this despite the fact that Disneyland does not pay well, the jobs require minimal intelligence and supervision is strict. Enculturation at Disneyland is thus a major feat of social engineering.

• (Source: Adapted from Van Maanen, 1991, cited in Brown, 1995, p. 55)

Page 29: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational cultureSymbols within business• Trice and Beyer (1984) concentrated the

symbols within a business. • They divided these into, first, high-level

symbols, which are the more obvious ones such as

• company buildings• logos

Page 30: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture

Chrysler Building, NY

BMW Building, Munich

Swiss Re Building, London

Page 31: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture

Page 32: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture

• Trice and Beyer go on to suggest four categories of low-level symbols:

• Practices• Communications• Physical forms• Common language

Page 33: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture

• Practices • Rites, rituals and ceremonies of the business. • Take many forms

• Annual office party• Employee awards• Inter-site competitions.

Page 34: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture

• Communications • Stories, myths and slogans that are circulated in

the business. • Stories about notable historic events become

part of the culture of the business and can influence behaviour.

• How the business started• A period of particular success (Golden Days)• Indicate preferred ways of performing and goals to aim for.

Page 35: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture

• Physical forms • Location of offices• Open plan or individual offices• Eating areas (executive suites or common areas)• Business suits or casual attire• Flipcharts or whiteboards• Office furniture.

Page 36: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture• Lend a helping hand. With millions of visitors every month, Google has become an essential part of everyday life - like a

good friend - connecting people with the information they need to live great lives. • Life is beautiful. Being a part of something that matters and working on products in which you can believe is remarkably

fulfilling. • Appreciation is the best motivation, so we’ve created a fun and inspiring workspace you’ll be glad to be a part of, including

on-site doctor and dentist; massage and yoga; professional development opportunities; shoreline running trails; and plenty of snacks to get you through the day.

• Work and play are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to code and pass the puck at the same time. • We love our employees, and we want them to know it. Google offers a variety of benefits, including a choice of medical

programs, company-matched 401(k), stock options, maternity and paternity leave, and much more. • Innovation is our bloodline. Even the best technology can be improved. We see endless opportunity to create even more

relevant, more useful, and faster products for our users. Google is the technology leader in organizing the world’s information.

• Good company everywhere you look. Googlers range from former neurosurgeons, CEOs, and U.S. puzzle champions to alligator wrestlers and Marines. No matter what their backgrounds Googlers make for interesting cube mates.

• Uniting the world, one user at a time. People in every country and every language use our products. As such we think, act, and work globally - just our little contribution to making the world a better place.

• Boldly go where no one has gone before. There are hundreds of challenges yet to solve. Your creative ideas matter here and are worth exploring. You’ll have the opportunity to develop innovative new products that millions of people will find useful.

• There is such a thing as a free lunch after all. In fact we have them every day: healthy, yummy, and made with love.

The Google Example – Reasons to work at Google

Page 37: Culture in Construction (2009)

Definitions of organisational culture• A common language • Jargon is common to many businesses -

shorthand form of communication• Jargon defines behaviour

• Disney employees are ‘cast members’ • McDonald's employees are ‘crew members’.

• Consider the ‘sales executives’ (i.e. salesmen) you have met

• Jargon defines ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’

Page 38: Culture in Construction (2009)

Factors influencing culture

• Where the culture of a business comes from, and how it develops, is the subject of much discussion within business studies. Every commentator seems to have their own list of key factors. One example is by Drennan (1992), who proposes twelve key factors that shape the culture of a business. These are:

Page 39: Culture in Construction (2009)

Factors influencing culture

• 1. Influence of a dominant leader• Vision• Management style• Personality of the founder or leader All have significant influence on the values that the

business tries to promote;

Page 40: Culture in Construction (2009)

Factors influencing culture

• 2. History and tradition of the business• how things have always been done• Why have things been done like that

• 3. Type of technology / goods and/or services it produces

• How does the product influence culture?• How does service influence culture?

Page 41: Culture in Construction (2009)

Factors influencing culture

• 4. Industry or sector of the business • How much competition• What type of competition• Basis of competition (price, quality, timeliness, novelty

etc)

• 5. Customers of the business – • Who they are the customers?• What do they expect;

Page 42: Culture in Construction (2009)

Factors influencing culture

• 6. Company expectations• Previous performance• Current norms• Future requirements

• 7. Types of information and control systems used

• Who needs what information, when and for what reason

Page 43: Culture in Construction (2009)

Factors influencing culture

• 8 Legislation and wider business environment• What drives business decisions

• 9. Procedures and policies within the business• ever-evolving, but often a good indicator of underlying values;

• 10. Reward systems and the measurement of performance

• Bonus• Car

• Perks • How did banking bonus culture drive recent financial

collapse?

Page 44: Culture in Construction (2009)

Factors influencing culture

• 11. How the business is organised and resourced• Who are the funders• What external stakeholders

• 12. Goals, values and beliefs• Objects• Actions• Language

Page 45: Culture in Construction (2009)

Drennan’s list summary

• Arguably some of the factors in Drennan's list are integral to culture of a business rather than influences that shape it.

• The culture in business, as in society, pervades every aspect of its operations.

Page 46: Culture in Construction (2009)

Conclusion• Culture is just one perspective that can help us to

understand more about a business. • Concept of culture developed from research into

differences between cultures at a national level. • Many cultural elements of a business are not obvious, but

there have been some attempts in the academic literature to develop definitions and identify influencing factors.

• Possible to see, or ‘feel’, that one business is different from another, and that this involves more than just how it presents itself to the outside world.

• Business values and accepted ways of doing things are often reflected in a business's socialisation programmes.

Page 47: Culture in Construction (2009)

References• Brown, A. (1995) Organisational Culture, London, Pitman.• Crace, J. (2000) ‘Feel at home with a job abroad’, Guardian, 14

October.• Drennan, D. (1992) Transforming Company Culture, London,

McGraw Hill.• Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's Consequences: International

Differences in Work Related Values, London, Sage.• Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.• Schwartz, H. and Davis, S. (1981) ‘Matching corporate culture and

business strategy’, Organizational Dynamics, Summer, pp. 30–48.• Trice, H. M. and Beyer, J. M. (1984) ‘Studying organizational

cultures through rites and rituals’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, pp. 653–69.