current and projected future emissions - side events at cop 18/cmp 8

13
The Emissions Gap Report 2012 Chapter 1: Current and projected future emissions Doha 29 November, 2012 Niklas Höhne [email protected] Lead Authors: Niklas Höhne (Ecofys, Germany); Jiang Kejun (Energy Research Institute, China) Contributing Authors: Claudine Chen (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany); Michel den Elzen (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Claudio Gesteira (COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); Kelly Levin (World Resources Institute, USA); Steve Montzka (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA); Jos Olivier (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Elizabeth Sawin (Climate Interactive, USA); Chris Taylor (Department of Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom); Fabian Wagner (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria); Zhao Xiusheng (Tsinghua University, China).

Upload: christina-dian-parmionova

Post on 15-Mar-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Contributing Authors: (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany); (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands);(COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); (World Resources Institute, USA);(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA); (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency ,Netherlands); (Climate Interactive, USA); (Department of Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom); (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria); (Tsinghua University, China).

TRANSCRIPT

The Emissions Gap Report 2012

Chapter 1: Current and projected future emissions

Doha 29 November, 2012

Niklas Höhne [email protected]

Lead Authors: Niklas Höhne (Ecofys, Germany); Jiang Kejun (Energy Research Institute, China)

Contributing Authors: Claudine Chen (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany); Michel den Elzen (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Claudio Gesteira

(COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); Kelly Levin (World Resources Institute, USA); Steve Montzka (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA); Jos Olivier (Netherlands

Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Elizabeth Sawin (Climate Interactive, USA); Chris Taylor (Department of Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom); Fabian Wagner (International

Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria); Zhao Xiusheng (Tsinghua University, China).

Related work of Ecofys

• Analysis of pledges, also against effort sharing approaches with Climate analytics and PIK: www.climateactiontracker.org

• Analysis of pledges against trends, incl. most recent policies with PBL and IIASA: www.ecofys.com/en/publications

• Analysis of pledges against mitigation potential with Climate Analytics and Wuppertal Institute http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/uba_ecofys_mitigation-potential-emerging-economies_side-event.pdf

• Wedging the gap, presented at ADP special event Sat, 13.00

The Emissions Gap Report 2012

Chapter 1: Current and future emissions

Doha 29 November, 2012

Niklas Höhne [email protected]

Lead Authors: Niklas Höhne (Ecofys, Germany); Jiang Kejun (Energy Research Institute, China)

Contributing Authors: Claudine Chen (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany); Michel den Elzen (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Claudio Gesteira

(COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); Kelly Levin (World Resources Institute, USA); Steve Montzka (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA); Jos Olivier (Netherlands

Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Elizabeth Sawin (Climate Interactive, USA); Chris Taylor (Department of Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom); Fabian Wagner (International

Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria); Zhao Xiusheng (Tsinghua University, China).

Greenhouse gas emissions have increased to 50 GtCO2e

Pledges reduce emissions to 57 to 52 GtCO2e

Case 1: unconditional / lenient Case 2: unconditional / strict Case 3: conditional / lenient Case 4: conditional / strict

What is new compared to last year?

• No major economy has significantly changed its pledge • Some countries have clarified their assumptions and ranges, e.g. :

– Belarus expressed their 2020 target as a single 8% reduction compared to 1990 levels rather than the range 5-10%

– Kazakhstan changed their reference year from 1992 to 1990 – South Africa included a range instead of a fixed value for their BAU – South Korea updated their BAU emissions in 2020 downwards

• Included additional effects of the use of offsets of 1.5 GtCO2e in the lenient cases

• We used only models that updated the analysis: Climate Action Tracker, C-ROADS, FEEM, Grantham, OECD, PBL, UNEP Risoe

• High recent and projected emissions growth following recent global macroeconomic trends

Gap 1 to 2 GtCO2e higher compared to last year’s report

Pledges reduce emissions to 57 to 52 GtCO2e

Lenient vs. strict rules

• LULUCF accounting 0.3Gt • AAU surplus 1.8Gt • Double counting of offsets

1.5Gt

Unconditional vs. conditional pledges

• Unconditional to conditional 2 GtCO2e

Pledges and submitted actions

Pledges by country

Pledges by country – emissions per capita

The Emissions Gap Report 2012

Chapter 1: Current and projected future emissions

Doha 29 November, 2012

Niklas Höhne [email protected]

Lead Authors: Niklas Höhne (Ecofys, Germany); Jiang Kejun (Energy Research Institute, China)

Contributing Authors: Claudine Chen (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany); Michel den Elzen (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Claudio Gesteira

(COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil); Kelly Levin (World Resources Institute, USA); Steve Montzka (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA); Jos Olivier (Netherlands

Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands); Elizabeth Sawin (Climate Interactive, USA); Chris Taylor (Department of Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom); Fabian Wagner (International

Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria); Zhao Xiusheng (Tsinghua University, China).