current company extract - department of water and ... · proprietary company 'amd house'...

• ASIC Australian Securities & Investments Commission

Current Company Extract

Name: B. & J. CATALANO PTY LTD ACN: 008 961 975

Date!Time: 28 October 2014 AEST 04:27:37 PM

This extract contains information derived from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) database under section 127 4A of the Corporations Act 2001.

Please advise ASIC of any error or omission which you may identify.

Julia

Text Box

Attachment 1B


Organisation Details

Current Organisation Details

Name: B. & J. CATALANO PTY LTD

ACN:

ABN:

Registered in:

Registration date:

Next review date:

Name start date:

Previous state number:

Status:

Company type:

Address Details

Current

Class:

Subclass:

Registered address:

Start date:

008 961 975

68008961975

Western Australia

24/03/1981

24/03/2015

UNKNOWN

C0792712E

Registered

Australian Proprietary Company

Limited By Shares

Proprietary Company

'Amd House' Unit 1, 28-30 Wellington Street, SUNBURY WA 6230

27/09/2013

B. & J . CATALANO PTY LTD

ACN 008 961 975

Document Number

SCD010N

Document Number

1E9809809

Principal Place Of 1 South Western Highway, BRUNSWICK WA 6224 5E0990259 Business address:

Start date: 30/05/2000

Contact Address

Section 146A of the Corporations Act 2001 states 'A contact address is the address to which communications and notices are sent from ASIC to the company'.

Address: PO BOX 1306, SUNBURY WA 6231

Start date: 04/09/2013

Officeholders and Other Roles Director

Name: STEPHEN JAMES CATALANO 5E1058739

Address: 50 Elinor Bell Road, LESCHENAUL TWA 6233 Born: 13/03/1965, PERTH, WA

Appointment date: 06/12/1995

Name: CLEM DAVID CATALANO 1E1955021 I Address: 227 Old Coast Road, AUSTRALIND WA 6233

Born: 11/05/1961 , PERTH, WA Appointment date: 06/12/1995

Name: BIAGGIO ROSARIO CATALANO 2E0912133

Address: 721 Clifton Road, BRUNSWICK WA 6224

Born: 24/01/1935, PERTH, WA Appointment date: 24/03/1981

Secretary ~

28 October 2014 AEST 04:27:37 PM 1


Name:

Address:

Born:

Appointment date:

Appointed Auditor Name:

Address:

Start date:

Share Information

Share Structure

CLEM DAVID CATALANO

227 Old Coast Road, AUSTRALIND WA 6233

11/05/1961, PERTH, WA

05/12/1997

TIMOTHY JAMES PARTRIDGE

Unit 1 30 Wellington Street SUNBURY WA 6230

23/04/2012

B. & J . CATALANO PTY LTD

ACN 008 961 975

1E1955021 l

028384069

-Class Description Number I Total amount Total amount Document

issued paid unpaid number

A A CLASS SHARES 2 2.00 I o.oo 0E9600478

B B CLASS SHARES 2 2.00 I o.oo 0E9753947

Members -

Note: For each class of shares issued by a proprietary company, ASIC records the details of the top twenty members of the class (based on shareholdings). The details of any other members holding the same number of shares as the twentieth ranked member will also be recorded by ASIC on the database. Where available, historical records show that a member has ceased to be ranked amongst the top twenty members. This may, but does not necessarily mean, that they have ceased to be a member of the company.

Name: CLEM DAVID CATALANO

Address: 227 Old Coast Road, AUSTRALIND WA 6233

I

Class Number held Beneficially held Paid Document number

I A I 1 I yes : FULLY I 0E2774597 I

Name: BIAGGIO ROSARIO CATALANO

Address: 721 Clifton Road, BRUNSWICK WA 6224

-Class Number held I Beneficially held Paid Document number

I A 11 I yes I FULLY 2E0912133 - ~

I -

Name: CLEM DAVID CATALANO

Address: 227 Old Coast Road, AUSTRALIND WA 6233

~ -Class Number held Beneficially held Paid Document number

B I 1 I yes I FULLY 0E2774597

28 October 2014 AEST 04:27:37 PM 2


Name: STEPHEN JAMES CATALANO

Address: 50 Elinor Bell Road, LESCHENAUL T WA 6233

Class Number held Beneficially held Paid

B yes FULLY

B. & J. CATALANO PTY LTD

ACN 008 961 975

Document number

0E9753947

------------------ - --

Financial Reports

Balance Report due , AGM due Extended AGM held Outstanding Document date date date AGM due date number

--30/06/1996 I I no 011465100

30/06/1998 31/10/1998 no 015200398

30/06/1999 31/10/1999 no 015463188

30/06/2000 31/10/2000 no I 018246749

30/06/2001 31/10/2001 no 018246752

30/06/2002 31/10/2002 30/11/2002 no 019602897 -

30/06/2003 31/10/2003 no 020224113 -30/06/2004 31/10/2004 no 021236542

-30/06/2005 30/11/2005 no 023128523

30/06/2006 30/11/2006 no 023484563 -30/06/2007 31/10/2007 no 024606827

30/06/2008 31/10/2008 no 025224935 I---

30/06/2009 31/10/2009 I no 026179083

30/06/2010 31/10/2010 no 027218337

30/06/2011 31/10/2011 no 027998091

30/06/2012 31/10/2012 no 02838406~

30/06/2013 31/10/2013 no 028728671 I

Documents

Note: Where no Date Processed is shown, the document in question has not been processed. In these instances care should be taken in using information that may be updated by the document when it is processed. Where the Date Processed is shown but there is a zero under No Pages, the document has been processed but a copy is not yet available.

I Date received Form type

21/12/2011 388H (FR 2011) Financial Report Financial Report -Large Proprietary Company That Is Not A Disclosing

28 October 2014 AEST 04:27:37 PM

-Date Number of Effective Document processed pages date number

12/01/2012 39 30/06/2011 027998091

3


- --Entity

23/02/2012 343 Notice Under Subsection 329(1a) To Remove Auditor

27/04/2012 3158 Notice Of Resignation Or Removal Of Auditor Removal Of Auditor

16/11/2012 388 (FR 2012) Financial Report

388E Company -Appoint Change Name/address Of Auditor 388H Financial Report - Large Proprietary Company That Is Not A Disclosing Entity

04/09/2013 4848 Change To Company Details Change Of Registered Address



01/11/2013 388H (FR 2013) Financial Report Financial Report -Large Proprietary Company That Is Not A Disclosing Entity

04/08/2014 9209 Pre 1991 Security Register Relating To

I Company Charges

04/08/2014 9207 Pre 1991 Mortgages, Charges, Debentures Receiver Appoint/ Cessation/accounts/reports

04/08/2014 9206 Pre 1991 Annual Return And Other Documents

04/08/2014 I 9206 Pre 1991 Annual Return And Other Documents

04/08/2014 9205 Pre 1991 Regd Office/place Of Business, Agent,Officeholders Shares-Allotment, Prospectus, Report Of Affairs, Trust Deed I

04/08/2014 9204 Pre 1991 Memorandum And Articles

21/08/2014 484 Change To Company Details

28 October 2014 AEST 04:27:37 PM

-

05/03/2012 1

06/06/2012 1

I 19/12/2012 39

04/09/2013 2

04/09/2013 2

20/09/2013 2

19/11/2013 39

04/08/2014 3

I

04/08/2014 19

04/08/2014 42

04/08/2014 60

04/08/2014 9

04/08/2014 16

21/08/2014 2

B. & J. CATALANO PTY LTD

ACN 008 961 975

- -·-

23/02/2012 027765735

23/04/2012 028167192

I

30/06/2012 028384069

04/09/2013 1 E9755571

-04/09/2013 1E9756891

-20/09/2013 1E9809809

30/06/2013 028728671

04/08/2014 910440668

04/08/2014 910440667

04/08/2014 910440666

04/08/2014 910440665

04/08/2014 910440664

04/08/2014 910440663

I 01/08/2014 2E0912133 I

I 4

Current Company Extract B. & J . CATALANO PTY LTD

ACN 008 961 975

~ ~---_-_-_ -_ -_ -~--------~-..:::_-----------------------------484 Off Or 484 Me Ad

A1 Change iceholder Name Address A2 Change mber Name Or dress

Note: Where the expression 'Unknown' is shown, the precise date may be available from records taken over on 1 January 1991 and held by ASIC in paper or microfiche.

***End of Extract of 5 Pages***

28 October 2014 AEST 04:27:37 PM 5

• c:::J

LEGEND

Premises Boundary

Crusher Sites

1000m Zone of Potential Impact

Residence

Internal Access Road

Property Boundary

Sealed Roads

LUNDSTROM ENVIRONMENTAL Scale: 1:18000 CONSULTANTS PTY LTD Original Size: A4

".

.,:. ..

..

" I ~ I .. I

' ,. 1

Air Photo Date: Nearmap (with Google 2015 21 Ballan Caurt La■ming WA 6149 D t A t r G t · 1994 (GDA94)

mlk■@Lundatrom-Envlronment■l.com.■u 8 um: us ra 1an eocen nc D117134863

www.Luncbtrom-Envlronmental.com.au

C• _... ., ..

~ ...

iii

'

II B&J Catalano Pty Ltd

Lot 1400 South West Highway, Glenlynn Gravel Extraction

Y:\Catalano\Lot 1400 SW Highway Bridgetown\2017 Works Approval Appllication\Drawings\Fig 2 Property and Surrounds.map 17/0.V.

ffilll!)[j)

..

Easting 421702 421131 421049 120911 420826 420632 6236900 420885 6236612 -420984 6236660 121069 6236152 -120905 6236'!60 420866 6236376 -420847 6236309 120819 6236188 -120806 6236172 120669 6236111 -420608 6236110 420651 6235998 -420982 6236001 121021 6236105 -121005 6236172 421038 6236196 -421053 6236260 121105 6236125 -121014 6236663 121703 6236736

Prescribed Premises & Surrounds

Attachment 2

LUNDSTROM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PTY LTD

ACN 600 398 945

_________________________________________________________________________________________________21 Sellen Court Tel: 08 9310 3297 Mob: 0417 934 863

Leeming E-mail: [email protected] 6149 www.Lundstrom-Environmental.com.au

ATTACHMENT 3A

PROPOSED ACTIVITIES

It is proposed to extract gravel from an area of 16.65ha (Figure 1) which will result in the extraction ofapproximately 166,500 cubic metres (m3) (or 333,000 tonnes) of material in total over a period of five years,dependent on demand and resource quality. A clearing permit (CPS 6776/1) was granted in November 2015to allow 14 trees to be cleared. This clearing was undertaken prior to September 2017 as required and nofurther clearing is needed for this activity. The crushing and screening circuit has a design capacity of 3500tonnes/day.

Key equipment to be used in the operation includes:

D10 or D9 Bulldozer CAT 980 Front End Loader Striker 1320 Crusher Finlay Screen 693 and Striker 25m Stacker Combination of trucks from either Standard Rigid Truck (14 tonnes), Single Semi-loader (24 tonnes),

Truck and Dog (40 tonnes), Road Train (50 Tonnes) Water Cart Generator

Working hours within the pit area, including crushing, screening and transportation of materials shall bebetween 0700 and 1700 Monday to Saturday and at no time on Sundays or public holidays.

Extractive operations will include topsoil removal, ripping, blading, crushing, screening and stockpiling ofgravel, truck loading of gravel and rehabilitation of the extraction area. There are no unique or non-standardprocesses or operations associated with the proposed gravel extraction. Stripped topsoil from each stage willbe placed in windrows along the edges of the working area to serve as noise, stormwater and visual barriers.

A bulldozer will rip the laterite and then blade it into the crushing/screening site until a large materialstockpile has accumulated. It is anticipated that the ripping and blading phase of the operation will beundertaken for approximately one month per year. Once all the raw material has been stockpiled, acrushing/screening unit will be deployed for a period of approximately six to eight weeks every second year.Trucks, as required, will enter and cart gravel product out of the site over the five year licence period.

After extraction, the final land surface will be approximately 1 metre lower than the original height. Thelandsurface will be progressively rehabilitated to pastures as each extraction stage is completed. Thelandsurface will be ripped and smoothed with the batters of the extraction area being blended to thesurrounding land at a gradient of not more than 1:6 vertical to horizontal. Topsoil will be placed on thereformed land and pasture grasses will be sown just prior to the winter rain season.

- ~

Emissions Discharge Points

Air, odour and light emissions are not applicable to this site. There are no solid or liquid wastes produced andno discharges to land.

The emission points are summarised below. Minimal noise and dust will be generated from the initial set-upphase of this activity, with the majority of noise and dust emissions occurring during actual operation.

Dust and noise emissions may be generated by the operation of the crushing /screening plant, removal of theraw material resource, loading of stockpiled material and vehicle movements along unsealed roads. Figure 1outlines the stages of extraction, the north and south crusher locations and internal access roads. The processof establishing the crushing and screening operation to become a prescribed premises requires the relocationof existing plant and equipment (its siting in relation to surrounding landuse is shown in Attachment 6).Gravel bunds will be installed around the crusher at the north and south location to a height of 4 metres toensure compliance with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 (Noise Regs). The NoiseImpact Assessments undertaken by Lloyd George Acoustics in 2012 and 2018 (and included as Attachment5A) covers in greater detail the noise impacts of the operation and management measures to ensurecompliance with the Noise Regs.

Measures to control dust emissions include: retaining a 15kL water cart on site during all times when gravel is being moved or crushed. Utilising

water cart to damp down areas if dust is generated. When crushing is undertaken a spray bar will be used at all times. If the wind is blowing towards the closest residences and conditions are dry, then operations will be

stopped until such time as adequate wetting down has occurred. Internal roads will be surfaced with gravel. Truck loads will always be covered so that no dust is generated in transit. A notice will be erected at the front gate and this will provide emergency contact details for the Quarry

Manager. A complaints system will be put in place and these will be recorded by the Quarry Manager and acted

on promptly. A polymer based spray-on soil stabilizer will be applied to topsoil and overburden stockpiles if they

do not stabilize by crusting and grass regrowth Employees and contractors working on site will be provided with information on how to minimise

dust emissions.

Storm water management will be based on the Department of Water Guideline, “Water ResourceConsiderations for Extractive Industries” (DoW 2014) which takes into account both runoff within theextraction area and runoff from adjacent catchments. Figure 2 attached outlines the measures that will beundertaken to manage stormwater on site. All surface runoff from unmined areas above an active pit will bedirected around the workings by means of cut-off bunds, to ensure that this water does not enter the disturbedpit areas.

Management of runoff generated within the extraction area will be contained via detention ponds designedto hold stormwater generated from a 10 year, 2 hour Average Recurrence Interval (ARI) Design Storm. Thedetention pond sizes have been calculated using the Rational Method with a 2hr rainfall of 14.9mm/hr (10 yrARI) obtained from the BoM website (BOM 2018). The runoff coefficient used for the calculation is 0.6 fordisturbed areas (ODOT 2014). The runoff calculated over the proposed extraction area from the 2hr/10yr ARIdesign storm is 1860m3. Stormwater management structures (detention ponds) will be designed to manageat a minimum, this runoff, as shown in Figure 2. Contour drains will also be installed to ensure all runoff withinthe extraction area is diverted into the ponds. Stormwater management measures will be implementedprogressively as extraction proceeds.

•

E

26~


21 S•H•n Court Leeming WA 8149 [email protected]

D417934883 -.Lundstrom-Envlronmental.com.au

t:ot 1400

Scale: 1 :4900 Original Size: A4 Air Photo Date: Nearmap {with 2015 Google image)

Datum Peg 421045E

6236679N 276.35mAHD

B&J Catalano Ply Ltd

Site access road

t:ot 4

Extraction Stages

Rehabilitated Areas

Stockpiles

Crusher

Sealed Access Road

Internal Access Road

Property Boundaries

♦ Datum Pegs

• Cleared Trees

Extraction Area Lot 1400 South West Highway 1---------------1

Glenlynn Attachment 3A Gravel Extraction Figure 1

Y:\Catalano\Lot 1400 SW Highway Bridgetown\2017 Works Approval Appllication\Drawings\Fig 3 Attach 3A Fig 1.map 11/05/2018


Scale: 1 :4500 Original Size: A4

B&J Catalano Pty Ltd

Extraction Area

Im Survey Contours

Sm Lidar Contours

- Contour Bunds

Detention Ponds Cut-off Bunds

___,. Surface Water Drainage

Drainage Channel

Rehabilitated areas

Property Boundaries

Stormwater Management & Contours

21 8•U•n Court, ~•ming WA 6141 [email protected]

04179348113 www.Lundstrom-Envlronmental.com.au

Air Photo Date: Nearmap (using Google 2015) Datum:

Lot 1400 South West Highway 1----------------t

Australian Geocentric 1994 (GDA94)

Glenlynn Gravel Extraction

Y:\Calalano\Lot 1400 SW Highway Bridgetown\2017 Works Approval Appllication\Drawings\Fig 4 Attach 3A Fig 2 Stormwater.map 23/(

Attachment 3A Fi ure 2

Noise Impact Assessment

Prepared For

B&J Catalano

April 2012

Reference: 12042101-01

Lot 1400 South West Hwy Glenlynn

Gravel Extraction Pit

GEORGE

LLOYD

Acoustics

Julia

Text Box

Attachment 5A Part 1

Lloyd George Acoustics

Report: 12042101-01

Lloyd George Acoustics Pty Ltd ABN: 79 125 812 544

PO Box 717 Hillarys WA 6923

Offices: Ocean Reef Padbury Scarborough Waterford

Phone: Fax:

Email: Mobile:

9300 4188 9300 4199 [email protected]

0439 032 844

9401 7770 9401 7770 [email protected]

0400 414 197

9245 3223 9300 4199 [email protected]

0438 201 071

9313 3655 9300 4199 [email protected]

0427 388 876

Member of the Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants – (AAAC)

Prepared By: Terry George

Position: Project Director

Date: 17 April 2012

This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services described in the contract or agreement between Lloyd George Acoustics Pty Ltd and the Client. The report relies upon data, surveys, measurements and results taken at or under the particular times and conditions specified herein. Any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to the aforementioned circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed or drawn by the Client. Furthermore, the report has been prepared solely for use by the Client, and Lloyd George Acoustics Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility for its use by other parties.


CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1

2 CRITERIA .......................................................................................................................... 2

3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 3

3.1 Meteorological Information .......................................................................................... 3

3.2 Topographical Data ..................................................................................................... 4

3.3 Ground Absorption ...................................................................................................... 4

3.4 Source Sound Levels .................................................................................................. 4

4 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 6

5 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................... 7

APPENDICES

A Terminology


Reference: 12042101-01.docx Page 1

1 INTRODUCTION

An extraction pit is proposed on Lot Lot 1400 South West Highway, Glenlynn as shown in Figure 1.1. This report has been prepared to assess the likely noise impacts from the pit and compares the predicted noise levels against the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.

Figure 1.1 – General Locality Map

Appendix A contains a description of some of the terminology used throughout this report.



2 CRITERIA

Environmental noise in Western Australia is governed by the Environmental Protection Act 1986, through the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 (the Regulations).

Regulation 7 defines the prescribed standard for noise emissions as follows:

“7. (1) Noise emitted from any premises or public place when received at other premises –

(a) Must not cause or significantly contribute to, a level of noise which exceeds the assigned level in respect of noise received at premises of that kind; and

(b) Must be free of –

i. Tonality;

ii. Impulsiveness; and

iii. Modulation”.

A “…noise emission is taken to significantly contribute to a level of noise if the noise emission exceeds a value which is 5dB below the assigned level…”

Tonality, impulsiveness and modulation are defined in Regulation 9. Noise is to be taken to be free of these characteristics if:

(a) The characteristics cannot be reasonably and practicably removed by techniques other than attenuating the overall level of noise emission; and

(b) The noise emission complies with the standard after the adjustments of Table 2.1 are made to the noise emission as measured at the point of reception.

Table 2.1 – Adjustments For Intrusive Characteristics

Tonality Modulation Impulsiveness

+ 5dB + 5dB + 10dB

Note: The above are cumulative to a maximum of 15dB.

The baseline assigned levels (prescribed standards) are specified in Regulation 8 and are shown below in Table 2.2.



Table 2.2 – Baseline Assigned Noise Levels

Premises Receiving Noise Time Of Day

Assigned Level (dB)

LA10 LA1 LAmax

Noise Sensitive1

0700 to 1900 hours Monday to Saturday (Day)

45 + influencing

factor

55 + influencing

factor

65 + influencing

factor

0900 to 1900 hours Sunday and public holidays (Sunday)

40 + influencing

factor

50 + influencing

factor

65 + influencing

factor

1900 to 2200 hours all days (Evening)

40 + influencing

factor

50 + influencing

factor

55 + influencing

factor

2200 hours on any day to 0700 hours Monday to Saturday and 0900 hours Sunday and public holidays (Night)

35 + influencing

factor

45 + influencing

factor

55 + influencing

factor

Noise Sensitive2 All hours 60 75 80

1. Applies within 15metres of a building associated with a noise sensitive use, as defined in Schedule 1, Part C. 2. Applies at a noise sensitive premises greater than 15metres from a building associated with a noise sensitive

use.

The influencing factor has been assumed to be 0 dB and therefore it is the baseline assigned noise levels of Table 2.2 that apply.

Note that the pit will only operate between 7am and 7pm Mondays to Saturdays and thus only the daytime assigned noise levels have been discussed.

3 METHODOLOGY

Computer modelling has been used to predict the noise levels under worst-case conditions to the two receiver locations. The software used was SoundPLAN 7.1 with the CONCAWE algorithms selected. These algorithms have been selected as they are one of the few that include the influence of wind and atmospheric stability. Input data required in the model are:

q Meteorological Information;

q Topographical data;

q Ground Absorption; and

q Source sound power levels.

3.1 Meteorological Information Meteorological information utilised is based on that specified in EPA Guidance for the Assessment of Environmental Factors No.8 Environmental Noise draft, and are shown below in Table 3.1.



Table 3.1 –Modelling Meteorological Conditions

Parameter Day (0700-1900)

Temperature (oC) 20

Humidity (%) 50

Wind Speed (m/s) 4

Wind Direction* All

Pasquil Stability Factor E

* Note that the modelling package used allows for all wind directions to be modelled simultaneously.

Note that the above conditions approximate the typical worst-case for enhancement of sound propagation. The EPA policy is that compliance with the assigned noise levels needs to be demonstrated for 98% of the time, during the day and night periods, for the month of the year in which the worst-case weather conditions prevail. In most cases, the above conditions occur for more than 2% of the time and therefore must be satisfied.

At wind speeds greater than those shown above, sound propagation may be further enhanced, however background noise from the wind itself and from local vegetation is likely to be elevated and dominate the ambient noise levels.

3.2 Topographical Data Topographical data was provided as digital 1-metre contours..

3.3 Ground Absorption Ground absorption varies from a value of 0 to 1, with 0 being for an acoustically reflective ground (e.g. water or bitumen) and 1 for acoustically absorbent ground (e.g. grass). In this instance, the surrounding ground has been assumed to be acoustically absorptive (1.0).

3.4 Source Sound Levels The sound power data used for this assessment are based on measurements undertaken by Lloyd George Acoustics on similar equipment and are shown below in Table 3.2.



Table 3.2 – Source Sound Power Levels, dB

Source

Frequency (Hz)

Overall dB(A) 25

31.5 40

50 63 80

100 125 160

200 250 315

400 500 630

800 1k

1.25k

1.6k 2k

2.5k

3.15k 4k 5k

6.3k 8k

10k

Mobile Primary Crusher

101 111 116 108 110 107 104 100 93

116 109 116 110 107 108 105 103 98 89

103 116 114 107 108 104 102 95 85

Mobile Secondary Crusher

100 104 108 107 111 107 105 105 100

117 112 113 108 106 110 106 105 106 97

100 115 109 108 108 105 105 103 94

Mobile Screening Plant

110 103 104 109 107 105 105 106 101

117 109 107 104 104 107 105 106 106 99

107 106 108 107 105 106 106 104 96

CAT 988 Front-end Loader 103 105 109 105 106 106 101 97 94 110

CAT D10 Dozer

94 99 105 105 105 104 104 95 87

112 103 101 107 104 106 102 98 92 83

97 103 107 102 102 101 96 91 81

Mobile Stacker

107 104 104 105 103 97 105 92 86

113 105 106 103 103 100 95 99 89 83

104 107 105 107 98 108 97 88 76

Diesel Genset 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 102

Truck moving at low speed 104 107 109 117 109 106 105 101 96 103

For the purposes of modelling, it has been assumed that all of the above equipment will be operating simultaneously. This, coinciding with worst-case wind conditions is likely to be a rare occurrence and therefore the predictions are considered to be conservative.



4 RESULTS

The predicted noise level to Receivers 1 to 10, as shown in Figure 1.1, is provided below in Tables 4.1 and 4.2. The results represent the two stages of the pits, with plant located either in the north or south extraction areas. As it is assumed that the noise from the plant has tonal noise characteristics, a +5dB penalty has been applied.

The predicted noise levels are also shown as contour maps in Figures 4.1 and 4.2.

Table 4.1 Predicted Noise Levels Assuming Plant is in the Northern Extraction Area

Receiver Predicted

Noise Level LA10 dB

Adjusted Noise Level for Tonality

Compliance with

Regulations Comment

1 44 49 No Noise from crushing and screening




5 34 39 Yes Compliant – No further action


7 Not Used Not Used






Table 4.2 Predicted Noise Levels Assuming Plant is in the Southern Extraction Area

Receiver Predicted

Noise Level LA10 dB

Adjusted Noise Level for Tonality

Compliance with

Regulations Comment





5 41 46 No Compliant – No further action


7 Not Used Not Used




When including penalties for tonality, the proposed pit is predicted to exceed the Regulations by up to 6 dB at nearby premises when the equipment is in the northern extraction area and would marginally exceed the Regulation by 2 dB when in the southern extraction area.

5 RECOMMENDATIONS

As noise levels are predicted to exceed the prescribed standards of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997, we would recommend the following:

1. Pit is to operate between the hours of 7am and 7pm, Mondays to Saturdays only.

2. A noise bund should be placed around the crushing and screening plant as shown in Figures 5.1 and 5.2. It should be noted that a noise bund may not be required for the plant located in the southern extraction area as the noise is predicted to only marginally exceed the Regulations. We would suggest that this requirement be re-assessed once the equipment is in location and can be measured. The predicted noise levels assuming the bund are provided in Figures 5.3 and 5.4.

3. Equipment noise levels to satisfy the sound power levels of Table 3.2.

4. Mobile equipment should be fitted with broadband type or smart type reversing alarms rather than the standard type.

Noise level LA10 dB

<= 40 Compliant With Regu<= 45 Exceeds Regulations<= 50<= 55<= 60> 60

4040

40

40

40

40

40

40

40 40

40

40

40

45

45

45

45

50

5050 5555

60

Signs and symbolsPlant

Receiver

GEORGE

LLOYD

A c o u s t i c s

Lloyd George Acousticsby Daniel [email protected](08) 9300 4188

Length Scale00 100 200 400 600 800

m

Figure 4.1Compliance Line(Includes Tonal Penalty)

B&J Catalano Gravel Pit - Lot 1400 SW Highway, GlenlynnPredicted Noise Levels For Plant in Northern Section - Without Noise BundsLA10 Noise Level Contours

* •

-

Noise level LA10 dB


40

40

4040

40

4040

40

4545

45

45

45

50

50

50

55

55

60


Receiver

GEORGE

LLOYD

A c o u s t i c s


Length Scale00 100 200 400 600 800

m

Figure 4.2

Compliance Line(Includes Tonal Penalty)

B&J Catalano Gravel Pit - Lot 1400 SW Highway, GlenlynnPredicted Noise Levels For Plant in Southern Section - Without Noise BundsLA10 Noise Level Contours

* •

Noise level LA10 dB



Bund

GEORGE

LLOYD

A c o u s t i c s


Length Scale00 10 20 40 60 80

Figure 5.1

Crushing and ScreeningPlant

B&J Catalano Gravel Pit - Lot 1400 SW Highway, GlenlynnNoise Bund Location For Plant in Northern Extraction Areas

• C=:J

Noise level LA10 dB



Bund

GEORGE

LLOYD

A c o u s t i c s


Length Scale00 5 10 20 30 40

m

Figure 5.2

Crushing and ScreeningPlant

B&J Catalano Gravel Pit - Lot 1400 SW Highway, GlenlynnNoise Bund Location For Plant in Southern Extraction Areas

Noise level LA10 dB


40

40

4040

40

40

40

40

4040

45

45

45

45

50

50

50

55

55

60


Receiver

GEORGE

LLOYD

A c o u s t i c s


Length Scale00 100 200 400 600 800

m

Figure 5.3Compliance Line(Includes Tonal Penalty)

B&J Catalano Gravel Pit - Lot 1400 SW Highway, GlenlynnPredicted Noise Levels For Plant in Northern Section - With Noise 4m BundsLA10 Noise Level Contours

* •

Noise level LA10 dB


40

40

40

40

4545

45 5050

55

60


Receiver

GEORGE

LLOYD

A c o u s t i c s


Length Scale00 100 200 400 600 800

m

Figure 5.4

Compliance Line(Includes Tonal Penalty)

B&J Catalano Gravel Pit - Lot 1400 SW Highway, GlenlynnPredicted Noise Levels For Plant in Southern Section - With Noise 4m BundsLA10 Noise Level Contours

* •


APPENDIX A

Terminology


Reference: 12042101-01.docx Page A1

The following is an explanation of the terminology used throughout this report.

Decibel (dB)

The decibel is the unit that describes the sound pressure and sound power levels of a noise source. It is a logarithmic scale referenced to the threshold of hearing.

A-Weighting

An A-weighted noise level has been filtered in such a way as to represent the way in which the human ear perceives sound. This weighting reflects the fact that the human ear is not as sensitive to lower frequencies as it is to higher frequencies. An A-weighted sound level is described as LA dB.

Sound Power Level (Lw) Under normal conditions, a given sound source will radiate the same amount of energy, irrespective of its surroundings, being the sound power level. This is similar to a 1kW electric heater always radiating 1kW of heat. The sound power level of a noise source cannot be directly measured using a sound level meter but is calculated based on measured sound pressure levels at known distances. Noise modelling incorporates source sound power levels as part of the input data.

Sound Pressure Level (Lp) The sound pressure level of a noise source is dependent upon its surroundings, being influenced by distance, ground absorption, topography, meteorological conditions etc and is what the human ear actually hears. Using the electric heater analogy above, the heat will vary depending upon where the heater is located, just as the sound pressure level will vary depending on the surroundings. Noise modelling predicts the sound pressure level from the sound power levels taking into account ground absorption, barrier effects, distance etc.

LASlow This is the noise level in decibels, obtained using the A frequency weighting and the S time weighting as specified in AS1259.1-1990. Unless assessing modulation, all measurements use the slow time weighting characteristic.

LAFast This is the noise level in decibels, obtained using the A frequency weighting and the F time weighting as specified in AS1259.1-1990. This is used when assessing the presence of modulation only.

LAPeak This is the maximum reading in decibels using the A frequency weighting and P time weighting AS1259.1-1990.

LAmax An LAmax level is the maximum A-weighted noise level during a particular measurement.

LA1

An LA1 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for one percent of the measurement period and is considered to represent the average of the maximum noise levels measured.



LA10 An LA10 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for 10 percent of the measurement period and is considered to represent the “intrusive” noise level.

LAeq The equivalent steady state A-weighted sound level (“equal energy”) in decibels which, in a specified time period, contains the same acoustic energy as the time-varying level during the same period. It is considered to represent the “average” noise level.

LA90 An LA90 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for 90 percent of the measurement period and is considered to represent the “background” noise level.

One-Third-Octave Band Means a band of frequencies spanning one-third of an octave and having a centre frequency between 25 Hz and 20 000 Hz inclusive.

LAmax assigned level Means an assigned level which, measured as a LA Slow value, is not to be exceeded at any time. LA1 assigned level Means an assigned level which, measured as a LA Slow value, is not to be exceeded for more than 1% of the representative assessment period.

LA10 assigned level Means an assigned level which, measured as a LA Slow value, is not to be exceeded for more than 10% of the representative assessment period.

Tonal Noise A tonal noise source can be described as a source that has a distinctive noise emission in one or more frequencies. An example would be whining or droning. The quantitative definition of tonality is:

the presence in the noise emission of tonal characteristics where the difference between —

(a) the A-weighted sound pressure level in any one-third octave band; and

(b) the arithmetic average of the A-weighted sound pressure levels in the 2 adjacent one-third octave bands,

is greater than 3 dB when the sound pressure levels are determined as LAeq,T levels where the time period T is greater than 10% of the representative assessment period, or greater than 8 dB at any time when the sound pressure levels are determined as LA Slow levels.

This is relatively common in most noise sources.



Modulating Noise A modulating source is regular, cyclic and audible and is present for at least 10% of the measurement period. The quantitative definition of tonality is:

a variation in the emission of noise that —

(a) is more than 3 dB LA Fast or is more than 3 dB LA Fast in any one-third octave band;

(b) is present for at least 10% of the representative

Impulsive Noise An impulsive noise source has a short-term banging, clunking or explosive sound. The quantitative definition of tonality is:

a variation in the emission of a noise where the difference between LA peak and LA Max slow is more than 15 dB when determined for a single representative event;

Major Road

Is a road with an estimated average daily traffic count of more than 15,000 vehicles.

Secondary / Minor Road

Is a road with an estimated average daily traffic count of between 6,000 and 15,000 vehicles.

Influencing factor

( ) ( )

100m within roadmajor each for 6450m within roadmajor each for 2

100m within roadsecondary each for 2 dB) 6 of (maximumFactor Traffic

noise thereceiving premises theof radius 450m a within land commercial of percentage the%TypeB

noise thereceiving premises theof radius a100m within land commercial of percentage theB Type %

noise thereceiving premises theof radius 450m a within land industrial of percentage the%TypeA

noise thereceiving premises theof radius a100m withinland industrial of percentage theA Type %

:

B Type %B Type %201A Type %A Type %

101

450

100

450

100

450100450100

=

=

=

+

=

=

=

=

+++=

where

Representative Assessment Period

Means a period of time not less than 15 minutes, and not exceeding four hours, determined by an inspector or authorised person to be appropriate for the assessment of a noise emission, having regard to the type and nature of the noise emission.



Background Noise Background noise or residual noise is the noise level from sources other than the source of concern. When measuring environmental noise, residual sound is often a problem. One reason is that regulations often require that the noise from different types of sources be dealt with separately. This separation, e.g. of traffic noise from industrial noise, is often difficult to accomplish in practice. Another reason is that the measurements are normally carried out outdoors. Wind-induced noise, directly on the microphone and indirectly on trees, buildings, etc., may also affect the result. The character of these noise sources can make it difficult or even impossible to carry out any corrections.

Ambient Noise Means the level of noise from all sources, including background noise from near and far and the source of interest.

Specific Noise Relates to the component of the ambient noise that is of interest. This can be referred to as the noise of concern or the noise of interest.

Satisfactory Design Sound Level The level of noise that has been found to be acceptable by most people for the environment in question and also to be not intrusive.

Maximum Design Sound Level The level of noise above which most people occupying the space start to become dissatisfied with the level of noise.

Reverberation Time Of an enclosure, for a sound of a given frequency or frequency band, the time that would be required for the reverberantly decaying sound pressure level in the enclosure to decrease by 60 decibels.

RMS The root mean square level. This is used to represent the average level of a wave form such as vibration.

Vibration Velocity Level The RMS velocity of a vibration source over a specified time period. Units are mm/s.

Peak Velocity Level of vibration velocity measured as a non root mean square (r.m.s.) quantity in millimetres per second (mm/s).



Chart of Noise Level Descriptors

Typical Noise Levels

Q) > Q)

_J

Q) (j)

0 z

LMln

Time

I ound Presswre Levels dl!l(A)

100

Rock Baml 90 - 1--- ~

80 Factory Floor

Busy Road 60

Nonrutl C.unversatinn 50

Open-Plan Offke 40

19 - ~ 30 . Library

20 Forest Barkgnmnd

10

0 .. : . :,:.~-- (;J

Threshold of Hearing

Lloyd George Acoustics PO Box 717

Hillarys WA 6923 T: 9300 4188 F: 9300 7770

E: [email protected] W: www.lgacoustics.com.au


To: B & J Catalano From: Daniel Lloyd

Attention: Peter Bennett Date: 5 April 2018

Email: [email protected] Pages: 5

Our Ref: 18044378-01

Re: Supplementary Noise Assessment for Stage 1 - Lot 1400 South West Hwy Glenlynn -Gravel Extraction Pit

ThisreportissupplementarytotheassessmentforthisgravelextractionpitundertakeninApril2012(NoiseImpactAssessment – Lot 1400 South West Hwy Glenlynn -Gravel Extraction Pit Ref: 12042101-01). This assessmentincludes theactual locationof thecrushingandscreeningplant forStage1,aswellasadditionalnoisesensitivepremises that have been constructed since the original assessmentwas completed. In addition, refinement onsomeoftheplantbeingusedhasbeenincludedbasedonrecentmeasurementsofsimilarequipment.

Thenew residence location and the layout of the crushing and screeningplant are provided inFigures 1 and 2respectively(courtesyofLundstromEnvironmentalConsultantsPtyLtd).

TherefinementofthesoundpowerlevelsfortheplantusedinthemodellingisprovidedinTable1below.

Table1 DetailsofPlantIncludedinModelling

PlantDescription SoundPowerLeveldB(A)

Mobilecrusherwithaggregate 113

MobilescreeningPlant 106

Electricpoweredstacker 103

Generator 102

Front-endLoader 110

Excavator 105

Dozer 110

TheresultsoftheassessmentareshowninFigure3.ItcanbeseenthattheassignedlevelofLA1045dB,undertheEnvironmentalProtection(Noise)Regulations1997,whichwouldbeapplicableforoperationsbetween7.00amand7.00pmMondaytoSaturdayaresatisfiedatallnoisesensitivereceivers.

Julia

Text Box

Attachment 5A Part 2

,..,... __ ,,,.,..., __ .., .,._ GIO I +L I ... F IOII

-II II 11, -

___ ,_ --------81te&lu1111..,c1a

Figure 1

Sc;reen

LUNDSTROM ENVIRONMENTAL Scale: 1 :2900 CONSULTANTS PTY LTD Original Size: A4

Air Photo Date: Nearmap (with Google 2015 21 SallencaurtLHmingWA6149 D t A t I" G t · 1994 (GDA94)

[email protected] a um: us ra 1an eocen nc D417934883

-.Lundstrom-Envlronmental.com.au

B&J Catalano Ply Ltd

Lot 1400 South West Highway, Glenlynn Gravel Extraction

§ • c::::J

C!!"2I c::::J XX XX

Generator.

LEGEND

Extraction Area

Crushing Plant

Sound source Unproccessed Feed Material

Product stockpile 7m

Topsoil stockpiles 2m Internal Access Road

Fences

Sound Sources & Stockpile Locations

Figure 2 Y:\Catalano\Lot 1400 SW Highway Bridgetown\2O17 Application Renewal\lnfonnation for Lloyd George\New Residence.map 20/03/20

Noise level LA10 dB


40

40

4040

40

4040

4040

40

45

45

45

45

45

45 45

50

50

50

505050

50

50

50

5555

55 55

55

60

Res 1

Res 11

Res 10

Res 2Res 3

Res 4

Res 5

Res 8

Res 6

Res 7

Res 9

Res 12

Res 13


Receiver


Length Scale0 100 200 400 600 800

m

Figure 3

B&J Catalano Gravel Pit - Lot 1400 SW Highway, GlenlynnPredicted Noise Levels For Plant in Stage 1 - With Noise BundsLA10 Noise Level Contours - Wind from All Directions

GEORGE

LLOYD

A c o u s t i c s



Detailedanalysisofnoisereceivedatthemostaffectedproperty,beingReceiver1,showsthattonalitywouldnotbepresentwhenallplant isoperational,however, is likelytopresent ifonlyoneitemofplantwereoperational.Thisisbecausethenoisefromotheritemsofplantwouldmaskthetonalnoisecomponentfromindividualitemsofplant. Should only one itemof plant, such as the front-end loader, be operational, then the noise level plus apenaltyof5dBwouldstillbebelowtheassigned levelofLA1045dB. Theresultsofthisanalysisareprovided inTable2.

Table2 AnalysisofNoiseLevelsatReceiver1

ItemofPlant PredictedNoiseLevelLA10dB

Front-EndLoader 39

Crusher 38

Dozer 38

Screen 35

Stacker 31

Generator 30

Conclusion

The resultsof thisassessmenthas shown that thenoise from Stage1of thegravelextractionoperationsat Lot1400 SouthWest Hwy Glenlynn, is predicted to comply with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations1997,between7.00amand7.00pmMondaytoSaturday.

Wetrustthisinformationisacceptableandshouldyouhaveanyqueries,pleasedonothesitatetocontactme.

Regards,

DanielLloyd

LUNDIT1IO■ ENYIRONIIIENTAL Seal•: 1:2800D CONSULTANTS PTY LTn Odgnal Slff; M

Air Phalo Didio: NHrm■p {with Google 201G 11 --.-•-

11• Dlllum· Aullrlll■n Geocenlrlc 199410-)

____ ... ____ . ~-....._._.., __ _ B&J Catalano Ply Ud

Lot 140a Soulh WNt Highway, Gi.nlynn Grawl Exlracllon

Y:ICalunoll.m.1-4mSWHlghlnyBrld..-,,.Z,17-Appn,valAppll~e_,_lond,aoou"""ndln,■p

""'"' 1000m Zone or Putentlal Impact ....... ....... ._ -Dran&ge Olanllllll

""""""'-

Sftlng & Location

Attachment 6

Attachment 8

Works Approval Fee Calculations

22105/2018 Fees calculator

Application Page 3 of 5 Wort<s Approval Fees

ff you are appl\llng for a woda approval ~ou musl provide the foSlowing details in accordance v,itb the Environmental Protectiofl Regt.datioos 1937. Guiclal)Ce on caku~ating w<Xks approval fees is available oo the O\tt/ER website..

Fees relate to the cost of the WOfks:,. inciuding all capc1al costs (iocfusive of GST) associated wilh the ponstrucfion and estabtrsbmentof the works proposed under the rorts approval application This-includes~ for ex-ample~ costs associated with earth works, ham stands, drainage, planl hire~ equfpment, processing planl. relocation of

equipment and labow- hire

Costs exclude'

land purchase costs

More than 100 000 out not more than 500 000 tonnes per year

I Select capacity range v i N/A

$534.00

Bad< Ex~ Continue