current draft eaw · 2021. 2. 12. · alternative means for communication of program information...

Attachments

Attachment 1

NRCS Soil Report

United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture

A product of the NationalCooperative Soil Survey,a joint effort of the UnitedStates Department ofAgriculture and otherFederal agencies, Stateagencies including theAgricultural ExperimentStations, and localparticipants

Custom Soil Resource Report for

Carver County, MinnesotaRon Olson Property

NaturalResourcesConservationService

December 11, 2020

PrefaceSoil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

3

ContentsPreface.................................................................................................................... 2How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8

Soil Map................................................................................................................9Legend................................................................................................................10Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11

References............................................................................................................13

4

How Soil Surveys Are MadeSoil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

5

scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report

6

identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.


7

Soil MapThe soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

8

9

Custom Soil Resource ReportSoil Map

4950

500

4950

600

4950

700

4950

800

4950

900

4951

000

4951

100

4951

200

4951

300

4951

400

4951

500

4950

500

4950

600

4950

700

4950

800

4950

900

4951

000

4951

100

4951

200

4951

300

4951

400

4951

500

442800 442900 443000 443100 443200 443300 443400 443500 443600 443700 443800 443900 444000 444100 444200 444300

442800 442900 443000 443100 443200 443300 443400 443500 443600 443700 443800 443900 444000 444100 444200 444300

44° 42' 53'' N93

° 4

3' 2

3'' W

44° 42' 53'' N

93° 4

2' 1

0'' W

44° 42' 19'' N

93° 4

3' 2

3'' W

44° 42' 19'' N

93° 4

2' 1

0'' W

N

Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS840 350 700 1400 2100

Feet0 100 200 400 600

MetersMap Scale: 1:7,350 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)

SoilsSoil Map Unit Polygons

Soil Map Unit Lines

Soil Map Unit Points

Special Point FeaturesBlowout

Borrow Pit

Clay Spot

Closed Depression

Gravel Pit

Gravelly Spot

Landfill

Lava Flow

Marsh or swamp

Mine or Quarry

Miscellaneous Water

Perennial Water

Rock Outcrop

Saline Spot

Sandy Spot

Severely Eroded Spot

Sinkhole

Slide or Slip

Sodic Spot

Spoil Area

Stony Spot

Very Stony Spot

Wet Spot

Other

Special Line Features

Water FeaturesStreams and Canals

TransportationRails

Interstate Highways

US Routes

Major Roads

Local Roads

BackgroundAerial Photography

The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)

Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Carver County, MinnesotaSurvey Area Data: Version 17, Jun 5, 2020

Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 12, 2010—Aug 2, 2016

The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.


10

Map Unit Legend

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

AE Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes

14.1 7.6%

CO Cordova clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes

2.6 1.4%

CW Cordova-Webster complex 23.1 12.5%

EB2 Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded

16.2 8.8%

GL Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes

2.9 1.6%

GP Pits-Udipsamments complex 1.3 0.7%

HC Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes

0.1 0.0%

HC2 Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded

25.1 13.6%

HD Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes

2.2 1.2%

KM Minneiska-Kalmarville complex, frequently flooded

15.2 8.2%

LA Le Sueur-Lester complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes

30.5 16.5%

LB2 Lester loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes

8.2 4.4%

LC Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes

0.2 0.1%

LC2 Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded

4.2 2.3%

LD Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent slopes

0.8 0.5%

LD2 Lester loam, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded

1.1 0.6%

LF Lester loam, 22 to 40 percent slopes

13.7 7.5%

LS Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes

1.7 0.9%

TB Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes

5.2 2.8%

WA Wadena loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes

1.0 0.6%

XB Rasset-Lester complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes

14.8 8.0%

XC2 Rasset-Lester complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded

0.2 0.1%


11


Totals for Area of Interest 184.2 100.0%


12

9

Custom Soil Resource ReportSoil Map

4950

880

4950

970

4951

060

4951

150

4951

240

4951

330

4951

420

4950

880

4950

970

4951

060

4951

150

4951

240

4951

330

443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030

443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030

44° 42' 50'' N93

° 4

3' 1

'' W44° 42' 50'' N

93° 4

2' 2

2'' W

44° 42' 32'' N

93° 4

3' 1

'' W

44° 42' 32'' N

93° 4

2' 2

2'' W

N


Feet0 50 100 200 300


Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Table—Hydrologic Soil Group (Ron Olson )

Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI


A 0.2 0.5%

CW Cordova-Webster complex

C/D 4.0 10.9%


A 7.8 21.2%

GP Pits-Udipsamments complex

1.0 2.8%


A 17.8 48.4%


A 1.4 3.8%


C/D 0.0 0.1%


C/D 0.2 0.5%


A 4.3 11.8%


Rating Options—Hydrologic Soil Group (Ron Olson )

Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition

Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified

Tie-break Rule: Higher


16

Map Unit Legend



0.2 0.5%

CW Cordova-Webster complex 4.0 10.9%


7.8 21.2%

GP Pits-Udipsamments complex 1.0 2.8%


17.8 48.4%


1.4 3.8%


0.0 0.1%


0.2 0.5%


4.3 11.8%


Map Unit DescriptionsThe map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.

A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They


11

14

Custom Soil Resource ReportMap—Hydrologic Soil Group (Ron Olson )

4950

880

4950

970

4951

060

4951

150

4951

240

4951

330

4951

420

4950

880

4950

970

4951

060

4951

150

4951

240

4951

330

443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030

443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030

44° 42' 50'' N93

° 4

3' 1

'' W44° 42' 50'' N

93° 4

2' 2

2'' W

44° 42' 32'' N

93° 4

3' 1

'' W

44° 42' 32'' N

93° 4

2' 2

2'' W

N


Feet0 50 100 200 300



28

Custom Soil Resource ReportMap—Farmland Classification (Mine Limits )

4950

880

4950

970

4951

060

4951

150

4951

240

4951

330

4951

420

4950

880

4950

970

4951

060

4951

150

4951

240

4951

330

443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030

443220 443310 443400 443490 443580 443670 443760 443850 443940 444030

44° 42' 50'' N93

° 4

3' 1

'' W44° 42' 50'' N

93° 4

2' 2

2'' W

44° 42' 32'' N

93° 4

3' 1

'' W

44° 42' 32'' N

93° 4

2' 2

2'' W

N


Feet0 50 100 200 300



Table—Farmland Classification (Mine Limits )

Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI


Not prime farmland 0.2 0.5%

CW Cordova-Webster complex

Prime farmland if drained 4.0 10.9%


Farmland of statewide importance

7.8 21.2%

GP Pits-Udipsamments complex







All areas are prime farmland

0.0 0.1%


All areas are prime farmland

0.2 0.5%


Farmland of statewide importance

4.3 11.8%


Rating Options—Farmland Classification (Mine Limits )

Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary

Tie-break Rule: Lower


32

ReferencesAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262

Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577

Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580

Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

13

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053624

United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf


14

Attachment 2

Wetland Delineation Report

13605 1st Avenue North #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090

ae-mn.com

WETLAND INVESTIGATION

RONALD OLSON PROPERTY PARCELS 080041400, 080041300

CARVER, CARVER CO., MINNESOTA

November 2, 2020 AE JOB NO. 16087

TABLE OF CONTENTS

WETLAND INVESTIGATION Ronald Olson Property Carver County, MN

November 2, 2020 P a g e 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT INFORMATION ...............................................................................................................................2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................3

BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................................................4

METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................4

RESOURCE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................5

FIELD REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................7

CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................................9

APPENDICES Appendix A FIGURES

Appendix B ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD DATASHEETS

Appendix C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Appendix D ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION RECORD

Appendix E OFF-SITE AGRICULTURE REVIEW

Appendix F CREDENTIALS

CONTACT INFORMATION



CONTACT INFORMATION PREPARED FOR:

Ronald Olson 6970 Inwood Road Cologne, MN 55322 (612) [email protected]

ENGINEERING CONSULTANT:

Kirsten Pauly, PE/PG Sunde Engineering, PLLC. 10830 Nesbitt Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55437 (952) [email protected]

PREPARED BY:

Dylan Kruzel Environmental Associate

Alex Yellick Environmental Associate Certified MN Wetland Delineator #1354

Ben Hodapp Environmental Services Manager Certified MN Wetland Delineator #1016 [email protected]

Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC 13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: (763) 412-4000 Fax: (763) 412-4090

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC was retained to provide professional wetland services using the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1; January 1987) and all supplemental guidance documents to identify areas meeting wetland criteria in the property identified by Carver County as parcel number 080041400 and a portion of parcel 080041300 located in Carver, Minnesota. The parcel is in Section 4, Township 114 North, Range 24 West.

Three wetlands or, portions thereof, was identified and delineated within the project area. The wetlands are summarized in Table 1 and depicted in Appendix A, Figure 5.

Table 1. Summary of delineated wetlands, corresponding sizes, and wetland type classifications.

WETLAND APPROXIMATE SIZE (ac) within project area

WETLAND TYPE CLASSIFICATION

CIRCULAR 39 COWARDIN EGGERS & REED

1 0.50 Type 2 PEM1B Fresh Wet Meadow

2 0.07 Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally Flooded Basin

3 0.01 Type 1 PEM1A Seasonally Flooded Basin

BACKGROUND & METHODOLOGY



BACKGROUND As requested by Sunde Engineering, Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC completed a wetland investigation at the property identified by Carver County as parcel number 080041400 and a portion of parcel 080041300 located in Carver, Minnesota (Appendix A, Figure 1). The parcel is in Section 4, Township 114 North, Range 24 West.

The wetland delineation was completed in accordance with the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the published regional supplement to the Army Corps Wetland Delineation Manual, Midwest Region.

The purpose of this study was to identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins, and classify the wetland habitats in the project area.

Fieldwork for this site investigation was completed by Environmental Associate, Dylan Kruzel and Alex Yellick, on August 5, 2020 and October 30, 2020. The weather in August was sunny and 75 degrees Fahrenheit; overcast and 42 degrees Fahrenheit in October.

METHODOLOGY U.S. Geologic Service 7.5” Topographic Quadrangle maps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory (PWI) maps, U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey, and available aerial photographs were consulted to initially locate potential wetland habitats.

Routine on-site Determination Method was used during this investigation. In this method, the following procedures were used:

1. The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether it met hydrophyticvegetation criteria based on the indicators identified in the Midwest Regional Supplement.

2. Soil pits were dug using a Dutch auger to depths of sixteen to thirty-six inches. The soil profile was notedin addition to any hydric soil characteristics.

3. Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow watertable and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits.

Data from sample points were recorded on Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland Determination Data Forms (Appendix B). At least one sample point transect crosses the delineated wetland edge. This transect consists of an upland sample point and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be in areas which have one or more other wetland criteria present; where questionable conditions exist; or to verify the absence of wetland criteria. Photographs were also taken of each resource (Appendix C).

Sample points were marked in the field with orange flags. The identified wetland boundary was marked with sequentially numbered pink flags. Active agricultural cropped areas were not physically marked. All sample points and the delineated wetland boundary were located using a Trimble Geo XH sub-meter GPS unit.

FIELD REVIEW



RESOURCE REVIEW The following resources were reviewed to supplement the wetland field delineation: NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY The National Wetlands Inventory identifies one PEM1A and PEM1Af in the project extent (Appendix A, Figure 2). USDA – NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL SURVEY Soil survey data for Carver County was obtained and reviewed prior to the delineation. Table 2 provides a list of the mapped soils in the project area. Figure 3 in Appendix A is a map of the soil units with percent hydric components.

Table 2. Summary of mapped soil units in the project area.

MAP UNIT SYMBOL MAP UNIT NAME HYDRIC STATUS HYDRIC RATING DRAINAGE CLASS SITE COVERAGE

HC2

Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes,

eroded

Non-Hydric 0% Somewhat excessively

drained 30.1%

EB2

Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent

slopes, eroded

Predominately Non-Hydric 5%

Somewhat excessively

drained 17.0%

CW Cardova-Webster complex

Hydric 100% Poorly drained 15.6%

XB Rasset-Lester

complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes

Non-Hydric 0% Well drained 14.7%

TB Terril loam, 2 to

6 percent slopes

Predominately Non-Hydric 8% Well drained 5.5%

HD

Estherville-Hawick sandy

loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes


drained 3.2%


Non-Hydric 0% Excessively drained 3.1%

GL Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1

percent slopes Hydric 100% Very poorly

drained 2.4%

FIELD REVIEW



Table 2. Summary of mapped soil units in the project area.

MAP UNIT SYMBOL MAP UNIT NAME HYDRIC STATUS HYDRIC RATING DRAINAGE CLASS SITE COVERAGE

LA Le Sueur loam, 1 to 6 percent

slopes

Predominately Non-Hydric 10% Somewhat

poorly drained 2.4%

LB2 Lester loam, 2 to 6 percent

slopes


GP Pits-

Udipsamments complex

No Rating 0% No Classification 2.0%

WA Wadena loam, 0 to 2 percent

slopes


LS Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3 percent

slopes

Predominately Non-Hydric 15% Somewhat

poorly drained 0.3%

HC

Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes


drained 0.1%

XC2

Rasset-Lester complex, 6 to

12 percent slopes

Non-Hydric 0% Well drained 0%

Hydric soils are defined in the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States: Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, version 8.2, 2018; The 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual; and The Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0).

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PUBLIC WATER INVENTORY The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory for Carver County does not identify public water in the project extent (Appendix A, Figure 4).

30-DAY ROLLING PRECIPITATION DATAA review of the 30-day rolling precipitation data collected from the University of Minnesota Climatology WorkingGroup (Appendix D) indicates that precipitation totals for the weeks prior to the site visit were below the range ofaverage in the general project area. The overall hydrologic conditions were suitable, however, for completing anaccurate wetland determination and boundary delineation.

OFFSITE HYDROLOGY REVIEW An offsite hydrology review was completed in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Board of Soil and Water Resources Guidance for Offsite Hydrology/Wetland Determination (July 2016). A total of five investigation areas were identified based on review of aerial photos from 2000 to 2019. A total of five aerial photos (2009,

FIELD REVIEW



2011, 2013, 2015, and 2017) representing normal precipitation conditions were used in the analysis (Appendix E). The analysis revealed the presence of wet signatures in all five investigation areas. This data, along with other offsite information (i.e., National Wetland Inventory, County Soil Survey) was used to inform if the secondary hydrology indicator, saturation visible on aerial imagery was checked on wetland determination forms.

FIELD REVIEW WETLAND 1

Wetland 1 is a type 2, PEM1B, fresh wet meadow that extends offsite to the east. The onsite portion is approximately 0.5 acre (Appendix A, Figure 5). The dominant vegetation in the wetland area consisted of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). The underlying soils are mapped as the predominantly non-hydric Terril loam. The investigated soil profile met the Loamy Mucky Mineral hydric soil indicator. Observed hydrology indicators include high water table, saturation, geomorphic position, saturation visible on aerial photography, and FAC-neutral test.

The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by steep slopes and are dominated by facultative upland orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) and common timothy (Phleum pretense). Hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology was absent in the upland.

WETLAND 2

Wetland 2 is a type 1, PEM1A, seasonally flooded basin that is entirely contained within the project area. The area is separated from Wetland 1 by a vegetated berm and surface connection is not present. The wetland is approximately 0.07 acre (Appendix A, Figure 5). Vegetation is not present and considered disturbed due to sedimentation and/or drowned out. The underlying soils are mapped as the non-hydric Hawick loamy sand. The investigated soil profile was determined to be problematic due to presence of approximately 24” of eroded depositional sediment and assumed hydric based on the presence of qualifying redox dark surface features below the eroded material. The hydrology indicators observed include surface soil cracks, saturation visible on aerial photography, and geomorphic position.

The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by moderate slopes, are dominated by smooth brome (Bromus inermis), prostate pigweed (Amaranthus bilitoides), and rough pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology criteria was not met in the upland position.

WETLAND 3

Wetland 3 is a type 1, PEM1A, seasonally flooded basin that is entirely contained within the project area. The area receives hydrology from drain tile outlets and abruptly transitions to a deeply incised ephemeral flow path/drainage. The wetland is approximately 0.01 acre (Appendix A, Figure 5). Vegetation consists of purple-stem aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum) and reed canary grass. The underlying soils met thick dark surface (A12) hydric soil indicator. The hydrology indicators observed include saturation, dry-season water table, geomorphic position, and FAC-neutral test.

The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by steep slopes, are dominated by American elm (Ulmus americana), boxelder (Acer negundo), and purple-stem aster. Wetland hydrology criteria was not met in the upland position.

FIELD REVIEW



INVESTIGATION AREA A

Investigation Area A is a cultivated vegetated swale area located in the northeast corner of the property (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the hydric Cardova-Webster complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated four years of the five normal years reviewed, however, wetland hydrology criteria was not met due to the presence of a functional drain tile stystem. Therefore, the area was determined upland.

INVESTIGATION AREA B

Investigation Area B is a cropped area under soy bean rotation located in the north portion of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a depression in the hydric soil unit Cardova-Webster complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated four of the five normal years reviewed, however, wetland hydrology criteria was not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.

INVESTIGATION AREA C

Investigation Area C is a cultivated nonwetland swale area located in the southeast portion of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the nonhydric soil unit, Rasset-Lester complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated two of five normal years reviewed, however, indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology were not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.

INVESTIGATION AREA D

Investigation Area D is a cropped area under soy bean rotation located in the southeast corner of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the nonhydric soil unit Estherville-Hawick sandy loams. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated three of five normal years reviewed, however, indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology were not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.

INVESTIGATION AREA E

Investigation Area E is a cropped area under soy bean rotation located in the southeast corner of the project area (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a sloped depression in the nonhydric soil unit Estherville-Hawick sandy loams. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated one of five normal years reviewed and indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology were not met. Therefore, the area was determined upland.

INVESTIGATION AREA F

Investigation Area F is a cultivated area located in the west portion of the property (Appendix A, Figure 5). The area is a depression in the hydric Cordova-Webster complex. Aerial imagery suggested that the area may be saturated four years of the five normal years reviewed, however, wetland hydrology criteria was not met to the presence of a functioning drain tile system. Therefore, the area was determined upland.

CONCLUSION



I certify that I performed the field analysis and/or wrote the report for this wetland determination.

_________________________________ ___________________ Dylan Kruzel Date Environmental Associate

I certify that I performed the field analysis and/or wrote the report for this wetland determination.

_________________________________ ___________________ Alex Yellick Date Environmental Associate MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1354 I certify that I performed the field analysis and/or reviewed work completed by above staff.

_________________________________ ___________________ Benjamin J Hodapp, PWS Date Environmental Services Manager MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1016

CONCLUSION Three wetlands, or portions thereof, were identified and delineated in accordance with the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual in the project area.

The wetlands in the project area may be regulated by several agencies at the local, state, and/or federal level. Activities which may potentially impact wetlands should be discussed in advance with the appropriate regulating agency regarding potential permit requirements. The Local Government Unit (LGU) responsible for implementing the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act at this project location is Carver County.

County may require vegetated buffers around all regulated wetland areas. Wetland buffers must meet the standards specified by the county for any project that is regulated under the Wetland Conservation Act.

This wetland investigation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and all applicable subsequent guidance for an on-site determination. The results reflect the conditions present at the time of the delineation.

November 2, 2020

November 2, 2020

November 2, 2020

Appendix A FIGURES

_̂

Latitude: 44.714004Longitude: -93.710125

Legend_̂Project Location

SOURCE: MnDNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Carver Co., Anderson Engineering

Project Location

San Francisco TownshipCarver County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441

P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com

Olson PropertyCarver County, MN

Figure 1Project Location

PID: 080041400Project No: 16087Date: 10.15.2020

I1 inch = 2 miles0 2 41

Miles

PEM1A

PEM1Af

PEM1A

PEM1C

PEM1Af

PEM1C

PUBG

PEM1A

PEM1A

PEM1C

PEM1A

PEM1A

R2UBGR2UBG

LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsNational Wetland Inventory


Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


Figure 2National Wetland Inventory


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet

2019 Carver Co. Imagery

LA

LA

LA

W

AE

AE

AE

AE

CWCW

CW

XC2

LA

LA

LA

WA

XBXB

XB

LB2

LC2

LC2 LF

LD

GL

LB2

LB2

HD

HD

EB2

EB2

LS

HC2

HC2

GP

GP

LF

HC

KM

TB

TB

TB

LD2

LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. Parcels

Hydric Rating by Map Unit0% Hydric Components1-32% Hydric Components33-65% Hydric Components66-99% Hydric Components100% Hydric Components


Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


Figure 3Carver Co. Soil Survey


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet

10023100

10002000

10004000

100228001002280010022800

Minn

esota

Rive

r (M-05

5)

Silver Creek

(M-055-027-001)

Bevens Creek(M-055-027)

LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsMN DNR InventoriedPublic WatercourseMN DNR InventoriedPublic Waterbasin


Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


Figure 4MnDNR Public Water Inventory


I1 inch = 0.5 miles0 0.5 10.25

Miles


2A

1A

Wetland 2Type 1PEM1A

SeasonallyFlooded Basin

0.07 Ac.Wetland 3

Type 1PEM1A

SeasonallyFlooded Basin

0.01 Ac.

IA-E

IA-F

3B3A

IA-A

IA-B

1B

2B

IA-C

IA-D

Wetland 1Type 2PEM1BFresh

Wet Meadow0.50 Ac.

LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsWetland Field Delineated8/4/2020 & 10/30/2020Sample PointDrain Tile Inlet/Outlet


Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


Figure 5Delineation


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet


Appendix B ROUTINE ON-SITE DETERMINATION METHOD DATASHEETS

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region

Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWP, Carver County Sampling Date: 08/04/2020

Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 1A

Investigator(s): A. Yellick, D. Kruzel Section, Township, Range: S. 4, Twp. 114N, R. 24W

Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave

Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.7119767 Long: -93.70704746 Datum: WGS 84

Soil Map Unit Name: Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (TB) NWI classification: PEM1Af

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No

Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No

Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes X No

Remarks:Area is below a drain tile inlet and hydrology is not impacted at this location. Area receives hydrology from upland vegetated swale. Area meets wetlandcriteria and is a Type 2, PEM1B, fresh wet meadow. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Dominance Test worksheet:Number of Dominant Species

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)

Total Number of Dominant

Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)

Percent of Dominant Species

That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:Total % Cover of: Multiply by:

OBL species 5 x 1 = 5

FACW species 95 x 2 = 190

FAC species 0 x 3 = 0

FACU species 5 x 4 = 20

UPL species 0 x 5 = 0

Column Totals: 105 (A) 215 (B)

Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.05

Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic VegetationX

2 - Dominance Test is >50%X

3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹X

4 - Morphological Adaptations¹ (Provide supporting

Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)

¹Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must

be present, unless disturbed or problematic.

Absolute Dominant Indicator

Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet ) %Cover Species? Status

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover

Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 feet )

1. Salix interior / Sandbar willow 5 Yes FACW

2.

3.

4.

5.

5 = Total Cover

Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 feet )

1. Phalaris arundinacea / Reed canarygrass, Reed canary grass 90 Yes FACW

2. Scirpus atrovirens / Green bulrush 5 No OBL

3. Cirsium arvense / Canada thistle 5 No FACU

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

100 = Total Cover

Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 feet )

1.

2.

0 = Total Cover

HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes X No

Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)

US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1A

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Depth Matrix Redox Features

(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type¹ Loc² Texture Remarks

0-8 10YR 2/1 100 Muck loam Sapric

8-16 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 3/4 2 C M Mucky loam Sapric

¹Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ²Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.

Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:Histosol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Marix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)

Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7)

Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)

Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)

Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks)

2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3)

Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)

Thick Dark Surface (A12) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ³Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and

Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present,

5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic.

Restrictive Layer (if observed):Type:

Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No

Remarks:

HYDROLOGYWetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)

Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)

X High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)

X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)

Water Marks (B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8)

Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)

Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)

Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X Geomorphic Position (D2)

Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)

Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Gauge or Well Data (D9)

Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks)

Field Observations:Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):

Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0

Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0

(includes capillary fringe)


Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area C: 5 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Saturatedsoil and water table is observed at the surface




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 1B


Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - BS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None


Soil Map Unit Name: Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (TB) NWI classification: PEM1Af




SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X


Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X

Is the Sampled Areawithin a Wetland? Yes No X

Remarks:Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.















Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation

2 - Dominance Test is >50%

3 - Prevalence Index ≤3.0¹







1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1. Dactylis glomerata / Orchardgrass 50 Yes FACU

2. Phleum pratense / Common timothy, Cultivated timothy 40 Yes FACU

3. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome20 No FACU

4. Boltonia asteroides / White doll's daisy 5 No OBL

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

115 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover

HydrophyticVegetationPresent? Yes No X



SOIL Sampling Point: 1B



0-16 10YR 2/1 60 10YR 3/4 40 C M Loam Distinct redox concentration

16-24 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M Loamy sand Distinct redox concentration





Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)



Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Redox Dark Surface (F6)






Remarks:



High Water Table (A2) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10)

Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)




Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2)

Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)




Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):

Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):




Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area C: 5 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Functionaldrain tile is present lower than the sampled area. Geomorphic position is not met




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 2A




Soil Map Unit Name: Hawick loamy sand, 20 to 40 percent slopes (AE) NWI classification: None


Are Vegetation X , Soil X , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X

Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)





Remarks:The area is an eroded/drowned-out basin. Area meets wetland criteria and is a Type 1, PEM1A, seasonally flooded basin. Antecedent precipitation isbelow normal for the time of year. This resource is separated from Resource 1 by a vegetated berm and no direct surface water connection is present.



















Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)X





1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover



Area appears to have been drowned out/sedimented in. The area is judged to support a predominance of hydrophytes if the disturbance was notpresent.


SOIL Sampling Point: 2A



0-24 10YR 3/2 100 Silt Eroded material

24-32 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 3/4 10 C M Silt loam Native, distinct redox concentration


40-42+ 10YR 2/1 100 Loam






Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Other (Explain in Remarks)








Remarks:The native soil profile would have met hydric soil criteria redox dark surface if the sediment was removed.


Surface Water (A1) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) X Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
















Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area C: 5 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Saturationobserved at 24 but water table was not observed below. Saturation indicator not met.




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 2B


Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - BS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None


Soil Map Unit Name: Terril loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (TB) NWI classification: None

Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)

Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X






Remarks:Area is adjacent to highly erodible cultivated slope. Normal circumstances are not thought to be present because of sediment and recent disturbance inthe area. Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome10 Yes FACU

2. Amaranthus retroflexus / Rough pigweed, Redroot pigweed 5 Yes FACU

3. Amaranthus blitoides / Prostrate pigweed, Procumbent pigweed 5 Yes FACU

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

20 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover




SOIL Sampling Point: 2B



0-22 10YR 2/2 98 10YR 3/4 2 C M Silt loam Eroded material, distinct redox concentration

22-32 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/4 5 C M Loam Native, distinct redox concentration














Remarks:The area would have met redox dark surface hydric soil criteria if the sediment layer was absent.






Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)












Remarks:




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 3-A




Soil Map Unit Name: CW NWI classification: PEM1A








Remarks:Hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology are present. Area meets wetland criteria.Antecedent precipitation is above the range of normal for the time of year.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1. Symphyotrichum puniceum / Purple-stem american-aster 20 Yes OBL

2. Phalaris arundinacea / Reed canarygrass, Reed canary grass 10 Yes FACW

3. Polygonum amphibium / Water smartweed 2 No FACW

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

32 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover



Smart weed is synest


SOIL Sampling Point: 3-A



0-16 10YR 2/1 100 Loam

16-24 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 3/6 5 M L Prominent redox conc.














Remarks:




X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Dry-Season Water Table (C2)









Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 16





Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met.



Project/Site: Carver County Parcel 080041400 City/County: San Francisco TWO, Carver County Sampling Date: 10/30/2020

Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: 3-B


Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None


Soil Map Unit Name: CW NWI classification: None








Remarks:Hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology is present. Area meets wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is above the range ofnormal for the time of year.
























1. Ulmus americana / American elm 30 Yes FACW

2. Acer negundo / Boxelder, Box elder 10 Yes FAC

3. Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana / Eastern redcedar 5 No UPL

4.

5.

45 = Total Cover


1. Ulmus americana / American elm 30 Yes FACW

2.

3.

4.

5.

30 = Total Cover


1. Symphyotrichum puniceum / Purple-stem american-aster 25 Yes OBL

2. Ribes cynosbati / Eastern prickly gooseberry 5 No FAC

3. Rubus idaeus / Common red raspberry 5 No FACU

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

35 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover




SOIL Sampling Point: 3-B



0-10 10YR 2/1 100 Loam

10-16 10YR 6/1 95 10YR 3/6 5 M Sandy clay loamProminent redox conc.








X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6)






Remarks:


















Remarks:




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-A


Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None


Soil Map Unit Name: Cordova-Webster complex (CW) NWI classification: None


Are Vegetation X , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X






Remarks:Area is within a vegetated agricultural drainage swale. Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time ofyear.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1. Glycine max / Soybean 65 Yes UPL


3. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome8 No FACU

4. Lotus corniculatus / Bird's foot trefoil, Bird's-foot trefoil 5 No FACU

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

103 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover



Area is under soybean rotation. Hydrophytes may persist under normal circumstances.


SOIL Sampling Point: IA-A



0-32 10YR 2/1 100 Loam Compacted

32-40 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy sand














Remarks:The profile is thick and dark and exceeds sample methodology. Profile is assumed hydric based on the mapped hydric soil unit.


















Remarks:Saturation observed at 30. Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imageryindicator is met. Functional drain tile is in the area and geomorphic position is not met.




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-B




Soil Map Unit Name: Cordova-Webster complex (CW) NWI classification: None








Remarks:Area is under soy bean rotation and normal circumstances are not present. The area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is belownormal for the time of year.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover



2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

100 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover



Area is under soybean rotation. Hydrophytes may persist under normal circumstances.


SOIL Sampling Point: IA-B



0-22 10YR 2/1 100 Loam


30-40 10YR 2/1 100 Clay loam














Remarks:Sampled profile is thick and dark and exceeds sample methodology. Profile is assumed hydric based on the mapped hydric soil unit.


















Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area B: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. Functioningdrain tile is in the area and geomorphic position is not met.




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-C


Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope


Soil Map Unit Name: Rasset-Lester complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes (XB) NWI classification: None








Remarks:The area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is below normal for the time of year.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover



2. Bromus inermis / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian brome25 Yes FACU

3. Trifolium pratense / Red clover 10 No FACU

4. Boltonia asteroides / White doll's daisy 3 No OBL

5. Verbena hastata / Swamp verbena 3 No FACW

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

116 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover




SOIL Sampling Point: IA-C











Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Redox Dark Surface (F6)






Remarks:


















Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area D: 2 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met. A functionaldrainage system (swale) is present. Geomorphic position is not met.




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-D




Soil Map Unit Name: Estherville-Hawick sandy loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded (HC2) NWI classification: None





Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X



Remarks:Area is under soy bean rotation and normal circumstances are not present. Area does not meet wetland criteria. Antecedent precipitation is belownormal for the time of year.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover



2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

100 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover



Under soy bean rotation. Hydrophytes may persist under normal circumstances.


SOIL Sampling Point: IA-D



0-8 10YR 2/2 100 Loam

8-16 10YR 2/2 98 10YR 3/3 2 C M Loam Faint redox concentration

16-24 10YR 2/2 100 Loam













Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X

Remarks:


















Remarks:Offsite Wetland Hydrology review Area E: 3 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery indicator is met.




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-E


Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Outwash - TS Local relief (concave, convex, none): None


Soil Map Unit Name: CW NWI classification: PEM1A





Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X



Remarks:Investigation area does not meet wetland criteria. Area is a not a wetland. Antecedent precipitation is above the range of normal for the time of year.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover



Vegetation consisted of a chopped soybean field; assumed hydrophytic. Smooth brome and prickly ash was observed in vegetated portions outside ofthe cultivated area.


SOIL Sampling Point: IA-E



0-43 10YR 2/1 100 Loam

43-45 7.5YR 3/2 100 Loam













Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X

Remarks:


















Remarks:Offsite wetland hydrology review Area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signature. Saturation visible on aerial imagery indicator is met.




Applicant/Owner: Sunde Engineering, PLLC State: MN Sampling Point: IA-F




Soil Map Unit Name: GL NWI classification: None


Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X






Remarks:Wetland hydrology is not present. The area was determined to be upland.
























1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

0 = Total Cover


1.

2.

0 = Total Cover



Recent soybean stubble; assumed hydrophytic.


SOIL Sampling Point: IA-F



0-45 10YR 2/1 100














Remarks:The soil profile was thick and dark. The profile is assumed hydric based on the mapped hydric soil unit and best professional judgment.


















Remarks:Offsite wetland hydrology review area A: 4 of 5 normal years showed wet signatures. Saturation visible on aerial imagery indicator was wet. Functioningdrain tile is in the area and geomorphic position is not met.


Appendix C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo 1. Wetland 1 – Viewing North Photo 2. Wetland 2 – Viewing North

Photo 3. Investigation Area A – Viewing West Photo 4. Investigation Area B – Viewing West

Photo 5. Investigation Area C – Viewing North Photo 6. Investigation Area D – Viewing South

Photo 7. Wetland 3 – Viewing North Photo 8. Investigation Area E – Viewing South

Photo 9. Investigation Area F – Viewing South

Appendix D ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION RECORD

Appendix D, Figure 1. Graph of recent precipitation in comparison with the normal range of precipitation in the general site location. Daily precipitation data is plotted independently and as a 30-day rolling total up to the date of the site visit. The normal range is plotted from precipitation data recorded from 1981 to 2010. The normal range is represented in this graph with two lines, the 30th percentile and the 70th percentile of the period-of-record data distribution.

Source: http://climate.umn.edu/

Appendix D, Figure 2. Minnesota State Climatology Office map depicting total precipitation for the week of the site visit.

Source: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/weekmap/weekmap.html

Appendix E OFF-SITE AGRICULTURE REVIEW

!(A

!(B

!(C

!(D

!(E

!(F

LegendProject ParcelCarver Co. ParcelsOffsite Investigation Areas


Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


Offsite Hydrology ReviewInvestigation Areas


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet


Wetland Hydrology from Aerial Imagery - Recording Form

Project: Olson Property Date: 10/15/2020 County: Carver

Comm #: 16087 Legal: S. 4 Twp.114N R.24W 44.714004, -93.710125

Area A Area B Area C Area D Area E Area F Area G Area H

2019 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS WS WS SS

2017 Carver Co. Normal NV NV WS NV SS NV

2016 Carver Co. Wet NV NV WS NV NV NV

2015 FSA Normal WS WS WS NV NV NV

2014 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS WS WS SS

2013 Carver Co. Normal WS WS WS WS WS NV

2011 Carver Co. Normal WS WS WS SS NV NV

2010 FSA Wet WS NV WS WS NV NV

2009 FSA Normal WS WS WS NV WS SS

2008 Carver Co. Dry WS WS WS WS WS SS

2005 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS NV NV SS

2003 FSA Dry CS NV WS NV NV NV

2002 Carver Co. Wet WS WS WS NV NV NV

2000 MnGEO Dry NV NV WS WS NV NV

Number of Normal 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Number with wet signatures 4 4 5 2 3 1Percent with wet Signatures 80% 80% 100% 40% 60% 20% 0% 0%

Acronyms:

WS-wetland signature SS-soil wetness signature CS-crop stress

NC-not cropped AP-altered pattern NV-nomal vegetatic cover

DO - drowned out SW-standing water NSS-no soil wetness signature

Image DateClimate Condition

(wet, dry, normal)Image Source

Image Interpretation

Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC Page 1 of 1




Decision Matrix.

YES Yes >50%

YES Yes 30-50%

YES Yes <30%

YES No >50%

YES No 30-50%

YES No <30%

No Yes >50%

No Yes 30-50%

No Yes <30%

No No >50%

No No 30-50%

No No <30%

TABLE 1.

Area

Hydric

Soils

Present

NWI Mapped

Percent

with wet

signtures

from Exhibit

1

A YES NO 80.00%

B YES NO 80.00%

C YES YES 100.00%

D YES YES 40.00%

E NO YES 60.00%

F NO YES 20.00%

G

H1 Answer N/A if field verification is not required and was not conducted

Yes if other hydrology indicators present

No

Yes

Yes

No


Yes


Yes


Field Verification RequiredHydric Soils

Present

NWI

Mapped

Percent with wet

signatures from

Exhibit 1

Wetland ?

Yes

No

Wetland?

No

No

Yes

No

No

Other Hydrolgy

Indicators Present 1

No Hydrology Present




No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

No




Precipitation Data

Year Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ANN

2019 2.90 6.02 3.43 5.31 5.92 4.94 3.58 40.14

2018 1.96 3.92 6.28 3.83 1.49 6.24 2.82 32.90

2017 3.53 5.79 3.54 3.44 5.24 1.61 4.87 30.48

2016 2.61 2.57 3.16 4.37 8.17 4.98 3.31 34.93

2015 1.97 4.32 4.32 5.66 2.61 2.71 2.72 31.69

2014 7.27 5.74 13.19 2.90 3.00 1.90 1.25 40.13

2013 5.11 5.10 5.71 3.61 1.42 1.58 2.81 30.68

2012 2.45 11.14 7.01 3.00 2.75 0.56 1.60 34.04

2011 2.83 4.07 4.16 7.12 1.85 0.49 0.89 26.73

2010 3.36 2.78 6.54 3.52 6.43 5.79 1.58 37.83

2009 1.56 0.91 2.86 1.47 8.07 1.20 5.94 28.73

2008 2.99 2.97 3.59 3.61 3.21 2.23 1.46 25.49

2007 1.13 2.47 1.48 2.02 7.11 3.58 4.51 29.52

2006 3.77 2.02 4.26 1.32 5.45 4.16 0.46 27.35

2005 2.83 3.67 5.32 1.45 2.94 6.37 3.88 32.14

2004 2.39 7.65 4.65 4.60 1.79 5.08 1.61 32.25

2003 2.28 4.43 2.86 2.55 0.91 2.64 0.62 20.00

2002 2.27 3.21 7.14 4.68 10.70 3.22 3.37 36.70

2001 6.14 4.30 3.60 1.46 1.94 2.64 0.67 27.78

2000 0.90 3.98 3.78 3.19 3.66 0.59 0.96 24.53

color key:

total is in lowest 30th percentile of the period-of-record distribution

total is => 30th and <= 70th percentile

total is in highest 30th percentile of the period-of-record distribution

Normal

Precipitation

Condition

Wet

Wet

Normal

Wet

Normal

Wet

Normal

Wet

Normal

Wet

Wet

Normal

Dry

Dry

Normal

Normal

Wet

Wet

Dry

Appendix F CREDENTIALS



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2000 MnGEO ImageryDry Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2002 Carver Co. ImageryWet Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 395.87 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2003 FSA ImageryDry Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com




I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2008 Carver Co. ImageryDry Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2009 FSA ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2010 FSA ImageryWet Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2011 Carver Co. ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com




I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com


2015 FSA ImageryNormal Precipitation Condition


I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet



Project Location


P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com




I1 inch = 400 feet0 400 800200

Feet

Benjamin Hodapp, PWS Environmental Specialist

13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com

CERTIFICATIONS Professional Wetland Scientist #1832 MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1016

EDUCATION MS Water Resources Management University of Wisconsin-Madison BS Biology; Ecology Minnesota State University- Mankato

SPECIALIZED TRAINING Wetland Delineation & Management Training Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. Wetland Plant Identification Biotic Consultants Inc. Plant Identification for Wetland Delineation University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Watershed Academy Web Certificate United States Environmental Protection Agency

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Society of Wetland Scientists MN Wetland Professionals Association (WPA) MN WPA President 2010 Wisconsin Wetlands Association Association of State Wetland Managers Minnesota Native Plant Society Ecological Society of America

TOTAL EXPERIENCE 19 years

YEARS WITH CURRENT FIRM 2004 to Present

PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS The Future of Rowan Creek Watershed: Connecting Land Use and Management with Water Quality. 2003. Water Resources Management Workshop 2002, Gaylord Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison. The Tumultuous World of Drainage Districts: An Analysis of Existing Management Arrangements, with Recommendations. Working Paper Series 2002-1. Water Resources Institutions and Policies, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin, Madison. South Shore Lake Bemidji Remediation & Restoration, Society of American Military Engineers meeting June 22, 2016, St Paul, MN.

SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Benjamin Hodapp, an Environmental Specialist and Senior Project Manager, brings a broad background of knowledge and experience in the environmental field to the Anderson Engineering team. Benjamin has a unique combination of multi-disciplinary academic training and work experience at various levels of federal, state and local government and private consulting. Benjamin’s project experience includes natural resource inventory and assessment; wetland delineation, mitigation design and monitoring; regulatory permitting; agency and stakeholder coordination; environmental impact assessment, environmental document preparation and public outreach.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Southwest Light Rail Transit- Metropolitan Council – Minneapolis, MN: Project manager for wetland delineation and permitting efforts in support of multi-disciplinary consultant team for preparation of Final Environmental Impact Statement for proposed 16 mile light rail alignment. Project tasks included completion of wetland delineations, preparation of all federal, state and local wetland permits and wetland mitigation plans, quality assurance and quality control of all deliverable products.

Harriet Island to South St. Paul Regional Trail – City of St Paul, City of South St. Paul and Dakota County – St Paul, MN: Project manager for wetland delineation, mapping and assessment efforts in support of multi-disciplinary consultant team responsible for preliminary engineering and final design. Project tasks included project management oversight and coordination, supervising field staff in completion of both off-site and on-site wetland determinations, boundary delineations, GPS mapping and functional assessments. Oversaw preparation of and responsible for quality assurance and quality control of all deliverable products.

Crosstown Blvd. Pedestrian Trail – City of Andover – Andover, MN: Project Manager for wetland delineation associated with proposed City trail improvements. Services included a wetland delineation, GPS mapping and functional assessment document findings and coordination and approval of findings with federal, state and local regulatory agencies.

Bennett Family Park Improvements – Minnetonka, MN: Project Manager for wetland delineation associated with proposed baseball complex improvements. Services included a wetland delineation, GPS mapping and functional assessment document findings and coordination and approval of findings with federal, state and local regulatory agencies.

Section 401/404 Wetland Permitting – Fort McCoy Commemorative Park Expansion – Fort McCoy, WI: Provided project management services for Section 401/404 permitting associated with proposed wetland impacts resulting from the Commemorative Park Expansion Project at the Fort McCoy U.S. Army installation. Project tasks included project management, developing a wetland mitigation strategy in compliance with Section 401/404 and state wetland permitting requirements and oversight and quality control in preparing Section 401/404 permit application.

Alex Yellick Environmental Associate

EDUCATION MS Environmental & Conservation Sciences North Dakota State University BS Biological Sciences North Dakota State University CERTIFICATIONS MN Certified Wetland Delineator #1354 MnDNR Tree Inspector #201005102 Erosion and Stormwater Management Construction Site Management HAZWOPER 40-hour Training TOTAL EXPERIENCE 5 years YEARS WITH CURRENT FIRM 2018 to present

SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Alex Yellick, an Environmental Associate, brings a broad range of knowledge and experience in the environmental field to the Anderson Engineering team. Prior to his employment with Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC, Alex worked as a certified wetland delineator and has background in biologic assessments, regulatory review/permitting and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. The skills that Alex developed through his educational background and experience make him proficient in assessing and addressing a range of environmental issues, and clearly communicating solutions to clients and various regulatory agencies.

Alex’s project experience includes biological assessments of urban and rural wetlands, environmental compliance oversight, stormwater best management practices design and compliance, and Phase I site assessments. Alex has experience with Global Positioning Systems, Geographic Information Systems, and AutoCAD.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Wetland Delineation/Assessment – Various Locations: services included wetland delineation and assessment of permitting requirements in support of linear construction projects and real-estate transactions. Project tasks included completion of wetland field delineations following the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Manual and Midwest Regional Supplement, boundary delineations, GPS mapping, and preparation of reports to document findings and assess wetland impacts.

Permitting and Compliance Activities – Minnesota, Arkansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas: Services included environmental permitting and operational compliance assistance associated with linear project construction and maintenance activities. Project tasks included assessment of proposed project environmental impacts to Federal and State regulated waters, floodplains, threatened and endangered species, historic properties, air quality, and local jurisdictional requirements, and preparation of permit applications and associated materials.

Stormwater Permitting and Compliance Activities – Greater Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area: Provided National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permitting and compliance support to linear construction project activities. Project tasks consisted of evaluating project workspaces for appropriate stormwater best management practices, preparation of stormwater plans/permits, permit compliance inspections and post-construction restoration inspections, and preparation of reports to document inspection findings.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment – Various Locations: Prepared Phase I Environmental Site Assessments of residential, commercial, industrial, and vacant properties in accordance with ASTM E1527-13. Project tasks generally included environmental desktop review, regulatory file review, site inspections, interviews, and preparation of reports to document findings.

Dylan Kruzel Environmental Associate

13605 1st Avenue North Suite 100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com

EDUCATION Bachelor of Science: Wildlife Biology Minor: Wetlands Ecology and Biology Bemidji State University – Bemidji SPECIALIZED TRAINING

S-130 Basic Wildland Firefighter

S-190 Introduction to Fire Behavior

L-180 Human Factors in the Wildland Fire Service

Certified Open Water Diver

OSHA 10 Hour Training

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS MN Wetland Professionals Association (WPA)

The Wildlife Society (TWS)

TOTAL EXPERIENCE 1.5 years YEARS WITH CURRENT FIRM 2020 to present

SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Dylan Kruzel, an Environmental Associate, brings a broad background of knowledge and experience in the environmental field to the Anderson Engineering team. Prior to his employment with Anderson Engineering of MN, LLC, Dylan worked for the Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) of Becker County as a Conservation Technician. He conducted field evaluations for conservation plans, monitored conservation easements, and provided available natural resource program information to landowners with conservation concerns. He has also assisted in the design and installation of various native habitat, shoreline restoration, rain garden, and storm water mitigation projects. The skills that Dylan has developed through his educational background and experience make him proficient in assessing and addressing a range of ecological indications and environmental issues.

Dylan’s project and educational experience includes conservation management practices, habitat management evaluations, species identification, wetland delineation and classifications. Dylan has experience with Collector for ArcGIS, Geographic Information Systems, Global Positioning Systems, and Realtime Landscape Architect.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Land Alterations and Field Monitoring – Becker County SWCD – MN: Services include performing the following general activities in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations: assisting in site evaluations and installing for various cost share projects like conservation easements, management practices, and shoreland alterations. Wetland Delineation/Reporting – Various Locations: Services included wetland delineation and reporting in support of linear construction projects and real-estate transactions for federal, state, and local agencies, as well as private companies. Project tasks included completion of wetland field delineations following the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region, and Northcentral and Northeast Region, GPS mapping, and preparation of reports to document findings and assess wetland impacts. NEPA Documentation – MN: Services include preparation of Categorical Exclusion Determination documents in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway Project Development Process. Project tasks include evaluation, coordination, and responding to assist private and state project managers in environmental documentation for Minnesota highways.

Attachment 3

Area Well logs

Minnesota Unique Well NumberMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

WELL AND BORING REPORTMinnesota Statutes Chapter 1031122148

County Carver Entry Date 05/26/1988

Quad Jordan Update Date 02/14/2014

Quad ID 90B Received Date

Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPOPPITZ, 115 24 W 33 DDCCCC 203 ft. 203 ft. 09/17/1984

Elevation 849 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid

Address Use domestic Status Active

Well Hydrofractured? Yes

No

From To

ThreadedCasing Type Single casing

No

Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint

Well 7425 50 CR MN

Geological Material From To (ft.) Color Hardness

SAND 0 9 SOFTBROWN

CLAY 9 28 SOFTYEL/BRN

CLAY 28 94 SOFTBLU/GRY

SAND 94 116 SOFTBROWN

CLAY 116 174 SOFTGRAY

SAND (FINE) 174 178 SOFTBROWN

SAND & CLAY 178 194 SOFTGRAY


Stratigraphy Information

Casing Diameter Weight

4 198in. To ft. lbs./ft.

stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 10in. ft.5 ft.ft.

Open Hole From ft. To ft.

Static Water Level

Pumping Level (below land surface)

WEST OF EAST UNION.

Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft. ft.

Wellhead Completion

Pump

Nearest Known Source of Contamination

Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor

Minnesota Well Index Report122148

HE-01205-15

Printed on 12/11/2020

YESPitless adapter manufacturer Model

At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above grade

PIONEER

X

Does property have any not in use and not sealed well(s)?

Grouting Information Well Grouted? Yes No Not Specified

No

ft.110 Measureland surface 09/17/1984

ft. hrs. Pumping at 35 g.p.m.

feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes

Not Installed Date InstalledManufacturer's name

Model Number HP VoltLength of drop pipe Capacity Typft g.p.

0.75 220

10144 Submersible

Yes No

Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes No

Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMIEG, K.

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat

AquiferDepth to Bedrock

Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

sand-brownMinnesota Geological Survey

Quat. buried

Digitization (Screen) - Map (1:24,000) (15 meters orSystem X Y443814 4951831

ft

UTM - NAD83, Zone 15, Meters

Unique Number Verification Input Date 05/21/2007Tax Records

Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedZABACK, 114 24 W 4 BADADC 415 ft. 415 ft. 05/20/1976

Elevation 900 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid



No

From To

Threaded1 ft.

Casing Type Single casing

No

X Above/BelowYesDrive Shoe?Joint


CLAY 0 15 MEDIUMBROWN

CLAY 15 93 MEDIUMGRAY

GRAVEL 93 114 MEDIUMBROWN


CLAY & GRAVEL 296 318 MEDIUMGRAY

SHALE 318 335 MEDIUMWHT/GRY


LIMEROCK 340 353 MEDIUMRED

GREEN SHALE-RED 353 372 MEDIUMGRN/RED

SANDSTONE-SHALE 372 415 MED-HRDWHITE




Screen? MakeType344Open Hole From ft. To ft.415

Static Water Level


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


Pitless adapter manufacturer Model

At-grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY)Casing Protection 12 in. above gradeX

A. Y. MCDONALD

X



No


ft.172 hrs.5 Pumping at 10 g.p.m.

55 feet Southeas Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes



05/20/1976

1607563 0.75 230

10189 Submersible

Yes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBohn Well Co. 70350 BOHN, G.

Remarks

Tunnel CIty/Lone Rock Fm

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

Wonewoc SandstoneMinnesota Geological Survey

Tunnel City-340


ft


Unique Number Verification Input Date 10/17/1994Information from

Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedREHWINKLE, 114 24 W 4 BABBAB 269 ft. 269 ft. 01/25/1977




No

From To


No


Contact 7625 50 CR COLOGNE MN


CLAY 0 18 SOFTBROWN

CLAY 18 63 SOFTBLUE

CLAY & SAND 63 130 SOFTGRAY

CLAY (BRICK) 130 242 SOFTGRAY


SAND WATER 258 269 SOFTGRAY



4 264 11in. To ft. lbs./ft.

stainlessScreen? Make JOHNSONX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 15in. ft.2645 269 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


COLOGNE.


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




STA-RITE

X



No


60 feet North Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



01/20/1977

1 230

10198 Submersible

Yes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, R.

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

sand-grayMinnesota Geological Survey

Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPETERSON, 114 24 W 4 BADCB 400 ft. 400 ft. 10/26/1978




No

From To

Threaded1 ft.


No


C/W COLOGNE MN 55322


YELLOW CLAY 0 23 SOFTBROWN

BLUE CLAY 23 65 SOFTGRAY




CLAY (BRICK) 184 317 SOFTGRAY



SHALE 356 385 SOFTGREEN

SANDSTONE 385 397 HARDWHITE






Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tobentonite ft.0 ft.0

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




FLINT & WALLING

X



No


ft. hrs.2 Pumping at 50 g.p.m.

feet Direction TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes



12/05/1978

0.75 230

12190 Submersible

Yes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M.

Remarks


Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Tunnel City-356


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHAAS, AL 115 24 W 33 DDADD 154 ft. 154 ft. 09/11/1979




No

From To

Threaded1 ft.


No


C/W CARVER MN 55315


DIRT 0 8 SOFTBLACK


CLAY 26 74 SOFTGRAY



SAND (MUDDY) 116 128 SOFTBROWN


SAND (MUDDY) 132 138 SOFTBROWN









Static Water Level



Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




FLINT & WALLING

X



No


ft. hrs.2 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.




09/15/1979

0.75 230

10108 Submersible

Yes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried

Digitized - scale 1:24,000 or larger (Digitizing Table)System X Y444184 4952048

ft


Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Name on mailbox

Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedSECK, ROLAND 114 24 W 4 ABBBC 240 ft. 240 ft. 12/04/1980




No

From To

Threaded0 ft.


No







BRICK CLAY 168 212 SOFTGRAY


SAND 233 240 SOFTGRAY






Static Water Level


EAST UNION UNINCORPORTATED COMMUNITY


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No


ft.0 hrs. Pumping at 35 g.p.m.




00/00/1980

1 220

15189 Submersible

Yes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHASS, AL 115 24 W 33 DDCCAC 174 ft. 174 ft. 10/07/1980




No

From To


No


Well 7335 50 CR MN


CLAY 0 9 SOFTYEL/BRN

SAND 9 34 SOFTBROWN

CLAY 34 83 SOFTGRAY




SAND (FINE) 139 163 SOFTBROWN







Static Water Level


W.OF EAST UNION.


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




FLINT & WALLING

X



No






0.75 220

10105 Submersible

Yes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedEDBLOM, MS. 114 24 W 4 BDACBC 380 ft. 380 ft. 02/22/1982




No

From To

Threaded0 ft.


No


C/W CARVER MN




SAND & CLAY 66 128 SOFTBROWN





CLAY 257 351 HARDGRAY


SANDSTONE 357 380 HARDWHITE





Static Water Level


NO ADDRESS LISTED.


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




A.Y. MCDONALD

X



No






00/00/1982

1 220

15180 Submersible

Yes No



Remarks


Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Tunnel City-351


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedVIERU, EERO 114 24 W 4 ABCDAC 256 ft. 256 ft. 03/26/1982




No

From To


No


Well 7510 159TH ST SW




CLAY 43 57 SOFTBLU/GRY

SAND & GRAVEL 57 93 SOFTBROWN




CLAY (STICKY) 215 246 HARDGRAY







Static Water Level


EAST UNION.


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




FLINTS & WALLING

X



No






0.75 220

Submersible

Yes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHAAS, AL 115 24 W 33 DDDBAA 142 ft. 142 ft. 03/12/1971




No

From To

0 ft.Casing Type Single casing

No



DIRT 0 8 BLACK

CLAY & SAND 8 16 BROWN

GRAVEL, SAND, CLAY 16 37 GRAY

SAND & CLAY (LOOSE) 37 65 GRAY

CLAY 65 110 GRAY

SAND (MUDDY) 110 134 GRAY

WATER SAND 134 142 GRAY




stainlessScreen? MakeX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 12in. ft.05 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No






03/00/1971

0.75

Submersible

Yes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedOLINGER, 114 24 W 4 ADDADC 270 ft. 270 ft. 10/20/1986

Elevation 869 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite



No

From To


No


Well 7255 159TH ST MN


GRAVEL (COARSE) 0 85 SOFTYELLOW

CLAY & SAND 85 140 HARDGRAY


SAND 258 270 HARDBROWN



4 254 10.7in. To ft. lbs./ft.



Static Water Level


JUNCTION CREEK BLK 1 LOT 5.


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


MERRILLPitless adapter manufacturer Model


RED JACKET

X



No






WATER 1 230

12196 Submersible

XYes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerGary's Well Co. 70417 SCHWICH, G.

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedREAD, GERALD 114 24 W 3 CCDADC 280 ft. 280 ft. 08/17/1987

Elevation 923 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite



No

From To


No


C/W 16530 40 CR CARVER MN


TOP SOIL 0 3

CLAY 3 15

GRAVEL 15 100

CLAY 100 275

SAND 275 280






Static Water Level



Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model


AERMOTOR

X



No


ft.275 hrs.0.5 Pumping at 30 g.p.m.

100 feet East Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes



08/17/1987

0.75 220

11216 Submersible

Yes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBraunwarth Well Co. 10068 BRAUNWORTH, M

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

sandMinnesota Geological Survey

Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedHENNING, JACK 114 24 W 9 BADCDB 446 ft. 446 ft. 12/01/1988




No

From To


No


C/W 16860 40 CR CARVER MN


SAND & GRAVEL 0 15

CLAY 15 118 BLUE

COARSE GRAVEL 118 140

CLAY 140 150 BLUE

SHALE 150 270 WHITE

CLAY 270 360 BLUE

FINE SAND 360 370

SHALE 370 380 GREEN

HARD SAND ROCK 380 446




Hole Diameter

6 378in. To ft.4 446in. To ft.


Static Water Level



Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model


WEBTROL

X



No



60 feet North Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes



12/02/1988

150M 1.5 230

15210 Submersible

Yes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerR.E.S. Well Co. 27276 STODOLA, R.

Remarks

Eau Claire Formation

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

Mt.Simon SandstoneMinnesota Geological Survey

Eau Claire-Mt.370


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedJAMES, BILL 114 24 W 4 ABABCD 216 ft. 216 ft. 09/08/1988




No

From To


No


Well 7575 50 CR MN


CLAY & SAND 0 28 SOFTBROWN










Static Water Level



Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No






0.75 220

12182 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedLINDQUIST, 114 24 W 4 CCDBBD 410 ft. 410 ft. 06/12/1991

Elevation 903 ft. Elev. Method 7.5 minute topographic map (+/- 5 feet) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Other



No

From To

Threaded1 ft.


No


C/W 7915 JOYCE RD COLOGNE MN 55322








SANDSTONE 385 410 SFT-HRDWHITE




Hole Diameter

9 20in. To ft.6 387in. To ft.4 410in. To ft.


Static Water Level



Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU4X5.5


AERMOTOR

X



No



55 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes



06/14/1991

1 230

12189 Submersible

Yes No



Remarks

Wonewoc Sandstone

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Wonewoc385


ft


Unique Number Verification Input Date 03/10/1995Address verification

Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedANDERSON, 114 24 W 3 BBCCCD 265 ft. 265 ft. 04/26/1993




No

From To


No


Well 7220 159TH ST SW CARVER MN 55315


SAND 0 60 SOFT

CLAY 60 150 SOFT

CLAY GRAVEL 150 240

SAND 240 265




Hole Diameter

8 265in. To ft.

stainlessScreen? Make COOKX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set2 15in. ft.2605 265 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft.0 260 ft.1.75 Cubic yardsbentonite ft. ft.

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No






04/26/1993

0.75 220

12162 Submersible

XYes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBraunwarth Well Co. 10068 BRAUNWARTH, M

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedGULDEN, 114 24 W 3 BABCAB 317 ft. 317 ft. 08/06/1993

Elevation 887 ft. Elev. Method CALC FROM 2-FOOT COUNTY DEM Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Qwik gel



No

From To


No


Well 15820 LUNDSTEAD RD MN


SAND 0 64 SOFTBROWN




STONES 290 307 HARDGRAY




4 312 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 317in. To ft.

plasticScreen? Make JAYCOX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set3 18in. ft.5 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft.0 30 ft.4 Sackswell grouted, type unknown ft.30 317 ft.

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 45.5


AERMOTOR

X



No



40 feet West Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



08/09/1993

1 220

12168 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedMARTIN, GLENN 114 24 W 3 BABDCB 294 ft. 294 ft. 05/04/1994




No

From To


No




CLAY 0 48 SOFTBROWN







4 284 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 294in. To ft.

plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.10 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


THE SOC IS A HOUSE

Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft. ft.

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No



70 feet South Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



1 220

12147 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedCRUSE, LARRY 114 24 W 3 BADCCD 191 ft. 191 ft. 05/23/1994




No

From To


No




SAND 0 81 SOFTBROWN






4 185 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 191in. To ft.

plasticScreen? Make JAYCOX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set3 18in. ft.10 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


THE SOC IS A HOUSE


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




MYERS

X



No






1 220

12147 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedDRAPP, 114 24 W 3 BADBCC 218 ft. 218 ft. 06/01/1994




No

From To


No




SAND & GRAVEL 0 82 SOFTBROWN






4 208 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 218in. To ft.

plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.10 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


THE SOC IS A HOUSE


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No






1 220

12105 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedFAHEY, DOUG 114 24 W 4 DCCBAD 227 ft. 227 ft. 08/25/1994




No

From To


No


Well 16480 WOODSVIEW LA MN


SAND 0 44 SOFTBROWN


SAND AND CLAY 163 204 SOFTBROWN




4 215 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 227in. To ft.



Static Water Level


THE SOURCE IS HOUSE


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No






0.75 220

10147 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedKUSS, BYRON 114 24 W 3 BDABCA 126 ft. 126 ft. 10/13/1994




No

From To


No




CLAY & SAND 0 34 SOFTBROWN

CLAY 34 97 SOFTGRAY




4 106 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 126in. To ft.

plasticScreen? Make CRESLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 15in. ft.10620 126 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Toneat cement ft.0 30 ft.bentonite ft. ft.

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




STA-RITE

X



No



40 feet South Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



0.75 220

1096 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedCOMBS, 114 24 W 4 DCBACC 175 ft. 175 ft. 11/02/1994




No

From To


No


Well 16450 WOODSVIEW LA MN


SAND 0 46 SOFTBROWN







Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 175in. To ft.



Static Water Level


THE SOC IS A HOUSE.


Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model SU 4X5.5


STA-RITE

X



No



35 feet Southwes Direction Other TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



0.75 220

10126 Submersible

XYes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 SCHMEIG, K.

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedTORMOEN, JEFF 114 24 W 4 AABCCD 227 ft. 227 ft. 06/07/1999




No

From To


No


C/W 7350 159TH ST CARVER MN 55315


CLAY 0 20 MEDIUMBROWN


SAND, GRAVEL 200 227 MEDIUMBROWN




Hole Diameter

8 227in. To ft.

plasticScreen? MakeX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 20in. ft.21710 227 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 217 ft.1 Cubic yards

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


WHITEWATERPitless adapter manufacturer Model


AERMOTOR

X



No






06/07/1999

1 230

12180 Submersible

XYes No

Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? Yes X No

Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerAssociated Well Co. 27259 SCHULTZ, M.

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

sand +larger-brownMinnesota Geological Survey

Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedASMUS, MARK 114 24 W 9 BACAAA 326 ft. 326 ft. 11/06/1997




No

From To


No


Well 7730 MARTIN DR MN


CLAY 0 26 SOFTBROWN








4 306 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 326in. To ft.

plasticScreen? Make CRESTLINEX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 18in. ft.30620 326 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No



70 feet Southeas Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



11/09/1996

1 220

12189 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedRAIN, DARRIN 114 24 W 9 ABDAAA 282 ft. 282 ft. 05/15/1997




No

From To


No


Well 16655 40 CR MN


SAND 0 61 SOFTBROWN






4 262 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 282in. To ft.



Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No



100 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



0.75 220

10189 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedTRIMBO, DON 114 24 W 5 ADDCAA 354 ft. 354 ft. 12/03/1999



Well Hydrofractured? XYes

No

From To


No


Well 7930 JOYCE RD CARVER MN 55315


CLAY 0 41 SOFTBROWN






GRAVEL 332 354 SOFTBROWN



4 334 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 354in. To ft.



Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 30 ft.3 Sacks

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


MONITORPitless adapter manufacturer Model PS 45


AERMOTOR

X



No






1 220

12210 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

gravel (+larger)-brownMinnesota Geological Survey

Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPOPPLER, 115 24 W 34 CCDBDD 119 ft. 119 ft. 06/28/2000




No

From To


No


Well 7060 50 CR CARVER MN 55315


TOP SOIL 0 3 SOFTBLACK

CLAY 3 25 SOFTYELLOW

CLAY GRAVEL 25 110 SOFTBLUE

SAND 110 119




Hole Diameter

6.5 119in. To ft.



Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft.0 114 ft.1 Cubic yards

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




STA RITE

X



No



100 feet West Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? Yes



07/08/2000

0.75 220

1090 Submersible

XYes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerBraunwarth Well Co. 10068 BRAUNWARTH, M

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole





Quad ID 90B Received Date 08/26/2004

Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedBERNIE, JOEL 114 24 W 4 BADDAB 334 ft. 334 ft. 07/07/2004




No

From To


No


Well 7625 JOYCE RD COLOGNE MN 55322


CLAY 0 48 SOFTBROWN




SAND & CLAY 299 314 HARDGRAY

SAND 314 334 HARDGRAY



4 314 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 334in. To ft.



Static Water Level



Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No






0.75 220

12189 Submersible

XYes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedBERNIE, JOEL 114 24 W 4 BADDAB 334 ft. 334 ft. 07/07/2004




No

From To


No


Well 7625 JOYCE RD COLOGNE MN 55322


CLAY 0 48 SOFTBROWN




SAND & CLAY 299 314 HARDGRAY

SAND 314 334 HARDGRAY



4 314 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 334in. To ft.



Static Water Level



Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No






0.75 220

12189 Submersible

XYes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well Co. 10125 LEUTHNER, M

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedPEARSON, DAN 114 24 W 3 CCBCDB 345 ft. 345 ft. 09/13/2005




No

From To


No


C/W 16550 40 CR CARVER MN 55315


SAND 0 18 SOFTBROWN

CLAY 18 62 SOFTGRAY







4 315 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 345in. To ft.



Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft. 30 ft.3 Sacks

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No



100 feet East Direction Body of water TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



3 220

20210 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedSECK, RANDY 114 24 W 4 BCDDBD 390 ft. 390 ft. 03/14/2005




No

From To


No


Well 7855 JOYCE AV CARVER MN 55315


CLAY 0 31 SOFTBROWN






SAND 365 390 HARDBROWN



4 370 1.9in. To ft. lbs./ft.

Hole Diameter

8.5 30in. To ft.6.2 390in. To ft.



Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tohigh solids bentonite ft. 30 ft.3 Sacks

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15




AERMOTOR

X



No



80 feet South Direction Septic tank/drain field TypeWell disinfected upon completion? X Yes



1 220

12210 Submersible

XYes No



Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock


Quat. buried


ft



Angled Drill Hole






Well Name Township Range Dir Section Subsection Well Depth Depth Completed Date Well CompletedWALSH, ROGER 114 24 W 4 ADAABB 182 ft. 182 ft. 08/03/2017

Elevation 859.6 Elev. Method LiDAR 1m DEM (MNDNR) Drill Method Non-specified Rotary Drill Fluid Bentonite



No

From To


No


C/W 7250 159 ST CARVER MN 55315


SAND & GRAVEL 0 60 BROWN

CLAY 60 140 GRAY

SAND & CLAY 140 160 GRAY

SAND 160 182 BROWN




Hole Diameter

8.5 20in. To ft.6.5 182in. To ft.

plasticScreen? Make BIGFOOTX TypeDiameter Slot/Gauze Length Set4 12in. ft.16220 182 ft.ft.


Static Water Level


Material FromAmount Tocuttings ft. ft.bentonite ft. 60 ft.4 Sacks

Wellhead Completion

Pump


Abandoned

Variance

Well Contractor


HE-01205-15


MERRILLPitless adapter manufacturer Model SMCK410


STA RITE

X



No






0.75 240

10100 Submersible

XYes No


Licensee Business Lic. or Reg. No. Name of DrillerLeuthner Well, Inc. 1480 LEUTHNER, B.

Remarks

Miscellaneous

Last Strat


Located by

Locate Method

First Bedrock

Minnesota Department of HealthGPS SA Off (averaged) (15 meters)

System X Y444105 4951429

ft


Unique Number Verification Input Date 06/21/2017Info/GPS from data

Angled Drill Hole

Attachment 4

General Requirements for Above Ground Storage

Tanks

General Requirements for Aboveground Storage Tanks

Tanks/Aboveground Storage Tanks #1.02 • April 2004

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • 520 Lafayette Rd. N., St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 • www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats

t-a1-02

his fact sheet outlines the requirements for regulated above-ground storage tanks (ASTs) found

in Minn. R. chs. 7001 and 7151. These rules apply to all ASTs storing a liquid substance that is not gaseous or solid at ambient temperature and pressure.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) must be notified about all ASTs within 30 days of installation or change in tank status (Minn. Stat. § 116.48).

The AST rules and notification statute does not indicate a minimum tank size, but the MPCA considers the smallest AST requiring registration to be a tank that is 500 gallons or greater in capacity. This size is consistent with underground storage tank notification requirements.

Owners and operators must complete and submit the AST Notification Form to the MPCA. To get a copy of this form, call MPCA at 651-296-6300 or toll-free at 1-800-657-3864 or on the MPCA Web site at www.pca.state.mn.us/cleanup/ast.

Exemptions from notification Tanks not required to be registered include:

• farm or residential tanks 1,100 gallons or less storing motor fuel for noncommercial purposes

• heating oil tanks 1,100 gallons or less

• agricultural chemical tanks

• tanks storing liquids that are a gas at atmospheric temperature and pressure

• tote tanks

• temporary tanks

• tanks that are less than 500 gallons

AST requirements Owners and operators must comply with AST requirements in Minn. R. 7151, unless exempted as outlined below.

Many ASTs are exempt from Minn. R. ch. 7151. They are:

• tanks containing 500 gallons or less

• farm tanks

• residential tanks 1,100 gallons or less used for noncommercial purposes

• equipment or machinery containing substances for operational purposes like hydraulic lift tanks, heating and cooling equipment, and electrical equipment

• vehicles designed and used to transport substances that don’t remain at the same location for more than 30 consecutive days or refill at the same site after dispensing the tank’s contents

• heating oil tanks 1,100 gallons or less

• wastewater treatment facility equipment

• indoor tanks

• tote tanks

• tanks greater than 500 gallons capacity, but less than or equal to 1,100 gallons capacity that are more than 500 feet from surface water

T

General Requirements for Aboveground Storage Tanks • t-a1-02 • April 2004

Page 2

• septic tanks

• a surface impoundment, pit, pond, or lagoon

• stormwater collection systems

• temporary tanks (tanks at a site less than 30 days

• storage tanks with drinking water, filtered-surface water, demineralized water, noncontact cooling water, or water stored for emergency purposes

Requirements for regulated tanks greater than 1,100 gallons All regulated tanks with a capacity greater than 1,100 gallons must:

• be registered with the MPCA

• be labeled

• be constructed using appropriate industry standards

• have secondary containment

• have a facility sign posted

• have substance transfer area safeguards

• have internal and/or external corrosion protection

• have overfill protection

• be monitored for leaks and regularly inspected

• be properly maintained

• have monitoring and inspection records on site

• assess releases during operations or at tank removal and report them to the State Duty Officer at 1-800-422-0798

• label lines so connections can be identified during substance transfer

• have underground piping safeguards if utilized

• be properly closed if no longer used

• be sampled for contamination when tank is removed

More information about these requirements and their effective dates can be found in fact sheets listed at the end of this document in the “Need more information” section.

Requirements for AST facilities with a capacity greater than one million gallons Facilities with greater than one million gallons total capacity for all liquid storage tanks must apply to the MPCA for a major facility permit. Requirements for tanks at these facilities are based on the individual site and tank characteristics (Minn. R. 7001.4200).

Requirements for small tanks near surface water Regulated tanks with a capacity of greater than 500 gallons, but less than or equal to 1,100 gallons that are within 500 feet of a class 2 surface water (water that can be used for recreational purposes) are required to:

• be registered with the MPCA

• be labeled

• provide secondary containment

• have a sign at the facility

• be constructed using appropriate industry standards

Requirements for temporary tanks Tanks larger than 1,100 gallons that store product for longer than 30 days, but less than one year are defined as temporary tanks and must:

• be labeled

• have a posted facility sign

• have secondary containment

• be maintained Temporary tanks with a capacity of greater than 500 gallons within 500 feet of a class 2 surface water must also meet the temporary tank requirements listed above. The MPCA will not require temporary tanks to be registered, however the rule requirements still apply.

Compliance with other regulations Other regulations that tank owners need to be in compliance with include:

General Requirements for Aboveground Storage Tanks • t-a1-02 • April 2004

Page 3

• the federal Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan

• the Minnesota “Spill Bill” requirements

• hazardous waste regulations

• state and local fire code

• other state and local regulations

Also, petroleum products that are stored for resale in ASTs greater than 2,000 gallons must comply with the petroleum product delivery law (see Petroleum Product Delivery Law fact sheet for more information).

Need more information? Visit the AST Program at www.pca.state.mn.us/cleanup/ast.html. The site has forms, fact sheets, and other information about ASTs and AST requirements. You can also call the MPCA at 651-296-6300 or 1-800-657-3864.

http://www.pca.state.mn.us/cleanup/ust.html

Attachment 5

DNR NHI Database Review Letter

Attachment 6

State Historic Preservation Office Review

1

Kirsten Pauly

From: MN_MNIT_Data Request SHPO <[email protected]>Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 5:58 PMTo: Cassandra BordenSubject: RE: Database Search Request

Hello Cassandra, Our database has no archaeologic or historic records for the given TRS. Jim

SHPO Data Requests Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office 50 Sherburne Avenue, Suite 203 Saint Paul, MN 55155 (651) 201‐3299 [email protected] Notice: This email message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search is only for previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. IN NO CASE DOES THIS DATABASE SEARCH OR EMAIL MESSAGE CONSTITUTE A PROJECT REVIEW UNDER STATE OR FEDERAL PRESERVATION LAWS – please see our website at https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/protection/ for further information regarding our Environmental Review Process. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic/architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or properties may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field surveys, may be necessary to adequately assess the area’s potential to contain historic properties or archaeological sites. Properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP are indicated on the reports you have received, if any. The following codes may be on those reports: NR – National Register listed. The properties may be individually listed or may be within the boundaries of a National Register District. CEF – Considered Eligible Findings are made when a federal agency has recommended that a property is eligible for listing in the National Register and MN SHPO has accepted the recommendation for the purposes of the Environmental Review Process. These properties need to be further assessed before they are officially listed in the National Register. SEF – Staff eligible Findings are those properties the MN SHPO staff considers eligible for listing in the National Register, in circumstances other than the Environmental Review Process. DOE – Determination of Eligibility is made by the National Park Service and are those properties that are eligible for listing in the National Register, but have not been officially listed. CNEF – Considered Not Eligible Findings are made during the course of the Environmental Review Process. For the purposes of the review a property is considered not eligible for listing in the National Register. These properties may need to be reassessed for eligibility under additional or alternate contexts. Properties without NR, CEF, SEF, DOE, or CNEF designations in the reports may not have been evaluated and therefore no assumption to their eligibility can be made. Integrity and contexts change over time, therefore any eligibility determination made ten (10) or more years from the date of the current survey are considered out of date and the property will need to be reassessed. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project’s potential to impact archaeological sites or historic/architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg‐Johnson, Environmental Review Specialist @ 651‐201‐3285 or by email at [email protected]. The Minnesota SHPO Archaeology and Historic/Architectural Survey Manuals can be found at https://mn.gov/admin/shpo/identification‐evaluation/.

current draft eaw · 2021. 2. 12. · alternative means for communication of program information...

Documents