Brandy Sellden

Teachers◦ Spontaneity and

Flexibility

◦ Share and re-use materials

◦ Professional Development

Students◦ Enjoyment and

motivation

◦ Collaboration and Participation

◦ Access to all

A+ Attitudes!

Box 2: Part of a lesson sequence illustrating how a combination of Inter Active Whiteboard features can foster interactivity.

Teacher Input Group Discussion

Group Presentations

Confirmation of Correct Science

The class observes a solid being heated. Running alongside the image of the heated substance is a table and graph plotting temperature against time.

Groups are asked to explain what is happening to the particles as the temperature is increased.

Each group presents its conclusions to the rest of the class using the IWB pen.

Teacher uses simulation software to explain particle movement at the various stages of heating and compares this with the pupils’ suggestions.

Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the "Wow" Factor: Developing Interactivity with the Interactive Whiteboard.

Kulik, J. (1994). Meta-Analytic Studies of Findings on Computer-Based Instruction

Measured by NAEPFrom Harold Wenglisnksy’s National Study of Technology Impact on Mathematics Achievement

Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the "Wow" Factor: Developing Interactivity with the Interactive Whiteboard. School Science Review, 86, 97-104.  

Harvey-Woodall, A. (2009). Integrating Technology into the Classroom. How does It Impact Student Achievement? Jackson State University.

Schacter, John. (1999). The Impact of Education Technology on Student Achievement, What the Most Current Research Has To Say.

Milken Exchange on Education Technology.

What the Research Says About Interactive Whiteboards. (2003). Becta ICT Research.