customer satisfaction study - san diego
TRANSCRIPT
Customer Satisfaction fStudy
Conducted for theConducted for theCity of San Diego Golf Operations Division
October 2011
Research you can trust. The direction you seek. The attention you deserve.
Purpose of StudyPurpose of Study
Profile customers’ frequency of golf play in Profile customers’ frequency of golf play in general and at the three San Diego courses
Evaluate customer experiences with and Evaluate customer experiences with and perceptions of the three City golf courses
Establish benchmark performance indicators Establish benchmark performance indicators that can be tracked over time
Collect background and demographic data Collect background and demographic data relevant to understanding customers’ perceptions, and needsp p
Methodology of StudyMethodology of Study
T l h d W b Telephone and Web survey
1,306 customers who played at least one round of golf at Torrey Pines, Balboa Park, or Mission Bay in 2010
Recruited via telephone and email
Conducted Apr 29 to May 9, 2011 Conducted Apr 29 to May 9, 2011
± 2.7% margin of error
Current Residence of Customers
USA O id SUSA,Outside CA
10.3
Outside USA1.6
CA, Outside SD County
Other SD County
7 5
SD County4.9
7.5
City of SanCity of San Diego75.7
Reason for Playing San i fDiego Course Most Often
27.8
17.0
54.9
40.3
36.7
28.2Affordability
Locat ion
2.4
3 3
2.2
1.5
36.1
Member
Course quality
2.4
8.8
6.0
3.3
1.0Tee-t ime availability
Member
Torrey PinesB lb P k
7.33.3
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Friend, family amember
% Respondents That Mentioned Aspect
Balboa ParkMission Bay
% Respondents That Mentioned Aspectas the Main Reason for Playing Course
Rating City of San Diego lfGolf Courses
3.6 3.5 9 5100
6.7
20.5
29.5
3.5 9.5
39 370
80
90
ayed
at
ours
e
Not sure
Very poor
57 6
39.3
50
60
70
nts
Who P
laR
ound a
t C
Poor
57.6
47.7
49.120
30
40
Res
ponden
Leas
t O
ne
R
Fair
Good
15.6 11.20
10
Torrey Pines Balboa Park Mission Bay
% L
Excellent
Torrey Pines Balboa Park Mission Bay
Most Mentioned Suggestions ffor ImprovementTorrey Pines Balboa Park Mission Bay
No changes needed (20%)Not sure / Cannot think of anything (25%)
Not sure / Cannot think of anything (20%)
Reduce fees costs inReduce fees, costs in general (14%)
No changes needed (17%) No changes needed (16%)
Not sure / Cannot think of anything (14%)
Improve green conditions (11%)
Improve course quality (14%)anything (14%) (11%)
p q y ( )
Enforce speed of play (10% Improve course quality (10%)Reduce fees, costs in general (12%)
Improve access to tee time info (8%)
Improve facility maintenance (8%)
Improve green conditions (11%)
Course Aspects With Highest i f ll dRatings of Excellent or Good
Torrey Pines Balboa Park Mission Bay
Layout of the course (98%) Layout of the course (88%)Availability of tee-times when making a reservation by phone (88%)
C t f lfOverall course condition (93%)
Courtesy of golf course starters, Marshals, maintenance staff (80%)
Condition of golf carts (78%)
Availability and condition of Availability of tee-times Availability of tee-times practice putting greens (91%)
when making a reservation by phone (77%)
when doing a walk-up reservation (76%)
Condition of fairways (91%)The value of the course for
Courtesy of golf course starters MarshalsCondition of fairways (91%)
the fee (76%)starters, Marshals, maintenance staff (75%)
Quality of the pro shop (90%)
Availability of tee-times when doing a walk-up
i (74%)Pace of play (73%)
(90%)reservation (74%)
Course Aspects With Lowest i f ll dRatings of Excellent or Good
Torrey Pines Balboa Park Mission Bay
Availability of tee-times when making a reservation by phone (44%)
Availability and condition of driving range facilities (33%)
Availability and condition of restrooms (25%)
A il bilit f t tiAvailability of tee-times when doing a walk-up reservation (44%)
Quality of the pro shop (42%)
Quality of the pro shop (27%)
Availability and condition of Availability and condition of Quality of food andAvailability and condition of driving range facilities (47%)
Availability and condition of restrooms (53%)
Quality of food and beverage services (35%)
Pace of play (52%)Condition of the bunkers (54%)
Condition of the bunkers (51%)(54%) (51%)
Availability and condition of restrooms (53%)
Condition of cart paths (55%)
Condition of cart paths (54%)
Likelihood of diRecommending Course
100
9.316.3
28.317.1
0
80
90
ed a
turs
e
Not sure
38.2
42.150
60
70
ts W
ho P
laye
Round a
t C
ou
Not likely
44.3
72.6
20
30
40
Res
ponden
Leas
t O
ne
R
Somewhatlikely
27.5
0
10
20
Torrey Pines Balboa Park Mission Bay
% Very likely
Torrey Pines Balboa Park Mission Bay
Key ConclusionsKey Conclusions
9 in 10 Torrey Pines customers rated 9 in 10 Torrey Pines customers rated their experience as excellent or good
Only 1 in 10 Balboa Park and Mission Only 1 in 10 Balboa Park and Mission Bay customers rated their experience as less than fairless than fair
Majority of customers at all three courses rated at least 19 of 22 specificcourses rated at least 19 of 22 specific services as excellent or good
Key ConclusionsKey Conclusions
9 in 10 Torrey Pines customers at least 9 in 10 Torrey Pines customers at least somewhat likely to recommend course
8 in 10 Balboa Park customers at least 8 in 10 Balboa Park customers at least somewhat likely to recommend course
7 in 10 Mission Bay customers at least 7 in 10 Mission Bay customers at least somewhat likely to recommend course
Areas for ImprovementAreas for Improvement
Torrey Pines Torrey Pines Availability of tee times, driving range
Pace of playPace of play
Balboa ParkCourse conditions maintenance Course conditions, maintenance
Driving range availability, conditions
Mi i B Mission Bay Course conditions, maintenance
Restrooms, food & beverage, pro shop