d'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence...

17
D'iie S ubrnitted i n fUur \ Corns n uteo Council file No . \~1~ Submitted in Gfflyi YYI\J VIt Ca. ^ vVTcL' 801 South Giand Avenue ' 11th Floor I-.OS Angeles, California POO 17 {213} 629-2071 Ftx: (213) 623-7755 glc^gjdeonliWJict www.gidconkw.nec Via E-MaiI and Hand Delivery [email protected] [email protected] February 28, 2017 JoJo Pewsawang, City Planning Department Sharon Dickinson, City Clerk's Office Los Angeles City Planning and Land Use Management Committee 200 N. Main St., Room 350 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: 2136-2148 East Violet Street: CPC-2016-1706-VZC-HD-SPR & ENV-2016-177-MND; Council Fite # 17-005 Dear Mr. Pewsawang and Ms. Dickinson: This Office respectfully writes on behalf of Unite HERE Local 11 and downtown Los Angeies resident Antonio Mendoza ("Commentors") with regard to the referenced Project in the City of Los Angeles ("City) for the Violent Street Project (CPC-2016-1706-VZC-HD-SPR, ENV-2016-177-MND) f"Project"). proposed by Lowe Enterprises/Violet Street Investor ("Applicant"). Our understanding is that the Project will be heard by the Planning and Land Use Management f"PLUM") Committee in the upcoming weeks. Commentors will soon submit more detailed comments, but for now write to express concerns about the Project's inadequate Mitigated Negative Deciaration/lnitial Study (MNP") in areas including traffic, land use inconsistency, hazardous substances and greenhouse gas ("GHG") impacts. Local 11 represents more than 20,000 workers employed in hotels, restaurants, airports, sports arenas, and convention centers throughout Southern California. Members of Local 11, including dozens who live and work in the City of Los Angeles, join together to fight for improved living standards and working conditions. Local 11 is a stakeholder in this Project, and worker and labor organizations have a long history of engaging in the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") process to secure safe working conditions, reduce environmental impacts, and maximize community benefits. The courts have held that "unions have standing to litigate environmental claims." Bakersfield Citizens v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1198. A MND has been prepared for this new, 9-story high rise Project, not a more comprehensive Environmental Impact Report ("£//?"), pursuant to CEQA law. This means that the less deferential "fair argument" standard applies. The "fair argument" standard creates a "low threshold" favoring 1

Upload: others

Post on 10-Mar-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

D'iie

S ubrnitted i n fUur \ Corns n uteo

Council file No . \~1~

Submitted in

Gfflyi YYI\J VIt Ca.^ vVTcL'

801 South Giand Avenue ' 11th Floor

I-.OS Angeles, California POO 17

{213} 629-2071 Ftx: (213) 623-7755

glc^gjdeonliWJictwww.gidconkw.nec

Via E-MaiI and Hand [email protected]@lacity.org

February 28, 2017

JoJo Pewsawang, City Planning Department Sharon Dickinson, City Clerk's OfficeLos Angeles City Planning and Land Use Management Committee 200 N. Main St., Room 350 Los Angeles, CA 90012

Re: 2136-2148 East Violet Street: CPC-2016-1706-VZC-HD-SPR & ENV-2016-177-MND; Council Fite #17-005

Dear Mr. Pewsawang and Ms. Dickinson:

This Office respectfully writes on behalf of Unite HERE Local 11 and downtown Los Angeies resident Antonio Mendoza ("Commentors") with regard to the referenced Project in the City of Los Angeles ("City”) for the Violent Street Project (CPC-2016-1706-VZC-HD-SPR, ENV-2016-177-MND) f"Project"). proposed by Lowe Enterprises/Violet Street Investor ("Applicant"). Our understanding is that the Project will be heard by the Planning and Land Use Management f"PLUM") Committee in the upcoming weeks.

Commentors will soon submit more detailed comments, but for now write to express concerns about the Project's inadequate Mitigated Negative Deciaration/lnitial Study (“MNP") in areas including traffic, land use inconsistency, hazardous substances and greenhouse gas ("GHG") impacts.

Local 11 represents more than 20,000 workers employed in hotels, restaurants, airports, sports arenas, and convention centers throughout Southern California. Members of Local 11, including dozens who live and work in the City of Los Angeles, join together to fight for improved living standards and working conditions. Local 11 is a stakeholder in this Project, and worker and labor organizations have a long history of engaging in the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") process to secure safe working conditions, reduce environmental impacts, and maximize community benefits. The courts have held that "unions have standing to litigate environmental claims." Bakersfield Citizens v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1198.

A MND has been prepared for this new, 9-story high rise Project, not a more comprehensive Environmental Impact Report ("£//?"), pursuant to CEQA law. This means that the less deferential "fair argument" standard applies. The "fair argument" standard creates a "low threshold" favoring

1

Page 2: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

environmental review through an E1R rather than through issuance of a negative declaration, even if other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket Protectors v, Sacramento (2005) 124 Cal.App.4th 903. An agency's decision not to require an EIR can be upheld only when there is no credible evidence to the contrary. Sierra Club v, County of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th, 1307,1318.

This Project is discretionary, not by right. Applicant seeks discretionary approvals under the City's Municipal Code including a Vesting Zone Change, Height District Change to 3.5:1 Floor Area Ratio ("FAR”) instead of the permitted 1,5:1 FAR and Site Plan Review. As such, PLUM must make express findings under the Municipal Code and Centra! City North Community Plan f"Community Plan"), Of particular concern is that this Project seeks to re-zone the City's precious M3-zoned industrial land. The Project therefore conflicts with the City's General Plan Framework Goal 31 of "[ijndustrial growth” and policy 3.14.6 that industrial-zoned land must not be reduced to "adversely impact the City's ability to accommodate sufficient industrial uses" (see General Plan Framework, Chapter 3}.1 2 The Project also conflicts with the Community Plan Goal 3 of providing "sufficient land for a variety of industrial uses" and Objectives 3-1 and 3-3 of "providing for existing and future industrial uses" and to "retain industrial plan designations" (see Community Plan, pp. 111-8-9)/

In sum, the City Council and PLUM have clear legal authority to disprove the Project if these required land use findings cannot be made. Kavanau v, Santa Monica Rent Control (1997) 16 Cal.4th 761, Commentors have serious concerns, that we will explain in more detail in a forthcoming letter, that this Project's MND is flawed and that the Project cannot satisfy the City's required land use findings and General and Community Pan goals and policies.

Thank you for consideration of these comments. We ask that they be placed in the Administrative Record for the Project.

1 Available at http://planniDg.lacitv.org/cwd/frainwic/chaDters/Q3/03209.htm.2 Available at https://planiiine.lacitv.ora/complan/Ddf/ccncDtxt.pdf.

2

Page 3: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the ERA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

Address PhoneName

[012 M krAiwncp Si.

Page 4: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

r~£xJAf^ ib,\

Page 5: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

• Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story building at 2130 S. Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site had elevated levels of chromium and lead as well as levels of perchlorethyene above laboratory reporting limits. Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the ERA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause nerve and brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. According to the Center for Disease Control, Chromium is a "well established carcinogen associated with lung, nasal and sinus cancer" at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

We, the undersigned, call on Counciimember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises7 project until a full environmental review is conducted.

Name Address Phone Email <,S

ft i%a4 iA>Xre Z- Q_ (XLI , okY 5 A ■ ■ ^ 'Zi ^

l/A

/ M.U

o\ oo2 \

•61b VW-> A^. m wot so lu A->do CA “Wo- (zX

s ~y>i ipt-Vvw 4:^hpb i£f>-> n 1u A- Cw\ XXJX ?

CW itu i ^7 - _ £of>'

v \ X\ \

A I Oi-rCS

\ <y\i^tOs

fcA\rt<6$

H )J^z( \ (hxn^lA

Ay-eyA.'o a-2

a.|v 1 l\ 7>

A 26 5, \e Ave tZH. IfA.SQys ft a - T Oi'-k > . co fv'

>/

h ~^;lk A/tn+KK

"AH <§> tk.^AK.Lo,'A>erU

^ J'rV^ ■ (f

t

lO CtrfPtftPAftJl* ) 7Zfn t A .

f IC.C\\> Me//' ■ 12 A ,V\d

-'■z 1 € 7/4 pi ->n 7/7 ZH/Z h^rrzk^:(i^/cpc

?4ric73fp?

7 (Zi/mituM

Page 6: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

I

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address

4. O /OPhone Email

____________________ _____________4p',______________________________________________

/f&ft /KJm 2-^1^ pLr&n \JvQj P&LSTfc

ciea. -

AhfV)^ W2SI tf-rth SrrLAf^i S<&a2a£88£>Qefivy 2-51 ft & \AY* \1\€$ AV~c. 100^1

l (a)WIk <>ln f- V"1-fWJ- flu u>Rpn'i Kv^AoH/tJ A 'Z?S'// HZfr Aj . fc,r!-<

n

ICa.Y'* Mn-Vhcr' Aft (urtlfl/id wfu

- n %'.aaiCipj J

ccryvv

mv.

1/lY^lh °(h i 51Z& Sh^lUo, [,A\ ftfYiqSIqaVJ-.E.AY.T 1 v V \f >1 I I | l * 8 i •w* * *-1 ■ ^ ,,_ii. iiiii i_\-ii?Ti i j S-1 *-*■ j 1 M T. 1*1** 1 ^ vv'.mfi

iu uif.ji/y lf)l. g,fiwiijL ft' k£ ml9- kAimMel*

ff£AlX6^ VlfiS K1 *rn Ct • AyT 7 MAltC'f Qyl k. isk<\ \*C2f\ {~hvi c^f ,__________

1 hJiQlZ'LSS IQlH M' fts$t ^7^CjfA\t% • ^22

VUd^-K ^ ^tv- ’• /V 1-Wup^ Ag. Wd&f

?; T 0-aSA.Coh—

MhlzAl l lliyy £ rJics *-?*

?y

Page 7: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the ERA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

-C-tJrfP-fcL Jkyf-. A. *v

^ O (/7j jH

l43i ST ' OilW/iiS'(jP~Kfp 5^" Sr

!*? 7 f . <•/ SZ'S IHZ3 (TAi^toSic^J^tUh'A.iU.

<$)322l)693o

j’pu'foy’JO ittW Upj-ivr 17k ,

-£\wA LqyVitesrV \ SS'

''Mmj \\oV\P. w. y AtfOAM

/ifVl j?i/h

L\326 S &>Wa% AHL't'S, i IjA

At) &(J1 wr Vaoy ? 16 6 3 r o -i fe (£/£■ f/g-

//

Page 8: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story building at 2130 S. Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site had elevated levels of chromium and lead as well as levels of perchlorethyene above laboratory reporting limits. Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a '"likely human carcinogen" that can cause nerve and brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. According to the Center for Disease Control, Chromium is a "well established carcinogen associated with lung, nasal and sinus cancer" at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

/Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

ewjwo iXiofJZiZ Sf Ott)tj£-&776 3?*

,_Wsn i41 *?[, t/v ^\

Ml A

iJ¥■

Sic ziY-oiz'?'

C

1^ I ui bo 1 bU S' $ m -i*

PuUa ,A 1^[ 1

Cit^L1 a <■ VA/-j,A V ? ft > ICO y

t'L.-.U-iL. tAdl. ^ Lh9 3 (A -gzis<dr, > ZZ, l ?V-v/ r- / 2_£ / // ^

37■■UA;

/7;dkZZJ-twl. ■- V A

3 /AS /7lW 61 i 1 X■'i Cl ^DOZ f

C3lVvs tCQjA) 3'^ 3 3 303

rjr37

"v \

^73(5 ■

Page 9: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

tLA {/>C rf<K .pmexsTTW L&rjs.qnrftf

Z A . 4v/c I!\ki/s P*'M» 47 2- u Ih^fl A /1S i( .A ( u t i A .<- 1 ',y ,■ ^ u y j c L- U , A ) 5A

niftfe "tL'iWiU Hk k?nA jjkkiAx^ k/ttk (AbaUr TbmfS, SI^O&Po'^{MU.^PiLUF-fK ■yy17 F&m V0&S< 0~L /}_ J f t^4 A-//\j & J 4t LA ( /b fpIk- n/ r s / kao\

------- L. ^ ̂ ^ f-*Hc< s . ...

U)S A.k'f & -6 „ 1 ,7VJ VJ A %\ ( ICoyr iV . Ov t>c4^ c a tuio

■ ' r • f

Page 10: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

• Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story building at 2130 S. Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site had elevated levels of chromium and lead as well as levels of perchlorethyene above laboratory reporting limits. Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause nerve and brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. According to the Center for Disease Control, Chromium is a "well established carcinogen associated with lung, nasal and sinus cancer" at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises' project until a full environmental review is conducted.

Name Address

UJU4 /W ^o 0s*-1 ”2 tX\ c ■ "7 v'i pi °i t>7. f

<*r~>

Phone Email

1^2£ lui. U!ci-Jr?Cl- rAMA'Zii

V7 7c-’ /;,£ rc,xs Chk J>,. its

C '

Htii y|[Aj^

V^4d U€C

5tlU ^ /4 0 0

7 KNiyn-Yi?-?rn f

Atmvk

\J Od vJ.AW

\

(* b ^

74 V 11

/

5idL 00 1^1 X C\Cs^ ^ I -tl

g.tvA • k4 vV ^ V"

c

1 r U s ■

A/ V c

(KVA fjlly fc5 ^*^0 .

1 0u/1DaOi'b ^25 C- ^ 50,

( N \Aj la bo <sf S- 0 ^ %

i.. j V \ \ 00-0

Iq I \j (kcX i

"2 lb -70? 5-hpl 2hiH€2>&Oe\/J000 I

Page 11: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

FSlf fuJ-i ■■ ho\

hh fW

C6S W\A*P> <?C Mf'l

Page 12: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

V

—"" f )^ 11A i/\

Ma

( ! 11 (W)Ll/'S I/il XenQHwfZ

^7 I c e%)~7V7(ri

' S’? T Asdnh./y'T ...... ...................L

Mmiq \i& pemn. c?y; N C8 LcU(T S ~t mujUts ■*•? t. ~t~T7Z 6-J - ey®? C S i yrw»y£?>^y^.

D/fi/idf/rr/vivirfS2- /0<<r/sictoclif/TazZ^l-

£<? liourzYTj ?<7s. 3/«-r*r-£

1

_s£''.yy.'

“t7!cu reHw<

c yj ff \v fy L\ (V fyvfrt \ ^ ^

iV\£c £?Z^

£ e^i

cm\OL,

Q^AAJ I

cj-- 3!Lk";

C-e.- 4'

Page 13: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of perchoioroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

■IV ? ?/Q t

Page 14: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

Page 15: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

X [ z - X > z

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

A{{ysX. yQf-;, \,h- Z-A/\GC-7\

n^,^o6‘0?Zioft.

-J- Ui’ t /

N. / ____L.^ L ft, A.

f 1 ' llh ( l<~i I iAr,\ G ifAi .WU,hhs,’, G\

x 'i 5 v. - w 5,4 ft ■s! 5 - ________................ .....

■r.;.\ ...-A-1 . I =•■ !

1 j.; ft . J*-- f Y

cxQA tosft ir^-GCi blr/Do.,K

,y\ '•i'j j G-jA ^ *• f £J7

ft/1'-1 ju f ^ —1 Q> 1 V- o

MwiJil,4fl\ tfGsVVf

ETt'\ 5u> jy\l ^gV \M/jw ^ w/vi V c ^ >'L 5~y i ^

- G/V^'\. ... jC-iA

- s.

Page 16: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email

W.m-\ ir* ArP furMte C/HIwb bU frfs

;!<€L 7>t UoV ^ la t -vr ^'-6' -/'.■■f/u-.-y. Ls

__ ; r - . ’ ~ . r ] TA Hf V

,^'KJS V/iWt 3 H •, HV

' ou"S; "ZS

(i T"ZC,0 ^+'7‘-(L1i ■Jfc'V-.V

I \ y\ jx-OtV

4 ya,,is>n--j c-i IC (7 ' f 0.. i’ ' C

x ■v.'nr-7 .''i iT 3Tf

T"

£<? st>

J Crt. K. j TtjLeGrZf- - // / // f / .7.,^ cf* /o-A >

Z Q'L ()rbk(:co(! ,j'P^NiSB Mfe^A-2^- /^sne^^r^ip) 9</<?h/S^ZtS

Juiyv&

/Z0 111/luslm, Kf /■■' / Zfc v-A 1 ,&AZZZ7 zZ- yZr^ I K?lf4 H Z 4A?4'//.

Czz -) h^h (Z-a'aA KSc :ut-'i.-j'1 r u-i ??

AfnWX\G \Uui% t I r,d u rim a 1 ft ^Hl ¥ ameraeefi

.' ■J *-v-' 'g

- ; r V It;

W/J tTA r-.yf 4-y

■ ■ x> .cr —

~ rp-O C-y k-tlAac.

5

J (

Page 17: D'iieclkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2017/17-0025_pc_2-28-17.pdf · other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Mejia v. Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322; Pocket

Percholoroethyene is a chemical characterized by the EPA as a "likely human carcinogen" that can cause brain damage at sufficient levels of exposure. Lead exposure even at low levels can cause neurological damage in children.

Lowe has not submitted a plan to clean up the contamination.

Lowe Enterprises is seeking approval to build a 9 story office building at 2130 S.Violet St. An environmental review revealed the site was contaminated withelevated levels of lead, as well as levels of percholoroethyne beyond laboratoryreporting limits.

We, the undersigned, call on Councilmember Huizar to say NO to Lowe Enterprises until a full environmental review is conducted.Name Address Phone Email