d2otfcr

Upload: jac-brouwer

Post on 02-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 d2otfcr

    1/4

    D2 O UDE TESTAMENT , 2001-2002; VIERDE COLLEGE : 1 OKTOBER 2001

    Frank Crsemann, Jahwe allein ist Knig - Traditionsgeschichte von 1 Sam 8,7

    und 12,12, pp. 73-84 of Der Widerstand gegen das Knigtum

    Introduction

    Crsemann states: 1Sam 8, 11-17 describes polemically factual relations of power(s)(72). Cf. I Kings 9:22a, 22b; I Sam 8:17. According to him, the addressees against whom

    the polemic is directed, are rich Israelite people (peasants).

    Central verses from I Samuel

    8:7 - ~h,yle[] %OlM.mi Wsa]m:( ytIao

    12:12 - ~k,K.l.m: ~k,yheloa? hw:(hy.w:

    A pre-Dtr tradition

    The Dtr-Dtn reform-conception, with its strong kingship-critical tendency, could not use

    the title of king for Jahwe. So in Dtn-Dtr thought the image of Jahwe as king is wholly

    strange (74). Yet, Dtr doesnt follow the alternative posed in the two texts cited above:

    either a mundane king or Jahwe as heavenly king; finally Dtr accepts, though

    critically, mundane kingship in Israel. So in verses 8:7 and 12:12 we probably have a

    pre-Dtr tradition. Whether this tradition was once part of the socio-critically arguing

    layer in I Sam 8 and 12, is for now still a question.

    Speaking of God as king

    The title king is in no way an original part of the faith in Jahwe, but a relatively late

    description, which arose from the cultural environs of Israel. In this environment,

    however, the divine king is absolutely no contradiction to the human king on the

    contrary: both belong together (75). According to Crsemann, this goes predominantly

    for Egypt and Ugarit. So speaking of Jahwe as the only king seems to be typical for an

    Israelite theological tradition.

    Roots of the Jahwe-as-king tradition

    The religious centre of talk of Jahwe as king was, of course, the temple cult at

    Jerusalem. Here, Jahwe was honoured as highest god, king of the gods, king of the

    world, but also as the king of Israel, and of the individuum. This talk had its roots in1

  • 7/27/2019 d2otfcr

    2/4

    Jebusite, pre-Davidic traditions. The same applies to the linking of this language with

    old-Israelite traditions, especially that of the Ark of Jahwe ( I Sam 6).

    Other HB-texts about kingship

    There are three further passages, which might help us a little further: Judges 8:22f,

    Deuteronony 33:5 and Numbers 23:21.

    I: JUDGES 8

    Jdgs 8:22f is a text, which, according to Crsemann, who pays not much attention to

    it, [a text which] consciously ignores the concept of king (75). In it we find a

    contrast of Jahwes kingship with kingly, earthly reigning:

    Then the men of Israel said to Gideon: You, rule over us - you, and your son, and the son of your son

    also: for you have delivered us from the power of Midian. And Gideon said to them: I wont rule over

    you, nor shall my son: the Lord shall rule over you.

    II: N UMBERS 23-24

    Further, in the order which Crsemann has, the book of Numbers requires our attention.

    According to Crsemann, the materials of chapter 24 are older than those of chapter

    23, especially the speeches, so we start with chapter 24. It contains two main speeches

    by Balaam:1) vv. 3-9, and

    2) vv. 15-19.

    In these speeches we find allusions to the kings Saul (v.7) and David (v.17f.). In Balaam

    s first speech in ch. 24 the victory of king Saul over Agag is central to Jahwes

    intervention for Israel. Balaam s second speech in this chapter is a glorification of

    David and his political sucess.

    Now we can look to chapter 23 especially verse 21. This chapter evokes clearlyanother picture. The speech-texts at least seem to be younger than those in chapter

    24. In Nmb 23 we have two speeches, delivered by Balaam:

    1) vv. 7-10, and

    2) vv. 18- 24.

    The earthly king doesnt play a role, the unassailability of Israel is exclusively and

    directly traced to Jahwe himself to his blessing (vv.8.20), his action (v.23b), and his

    presence. For the decisive factor for Israels security is described in verse 21b as

    2

  • 7/27/2019 d2otfcr

    3/4

    follows:

    Jahwe, his God, is with him ( wOM[i ) and %l,m, t[;Wrt. in his midst. (transl.: FCr)The Lord, their (= the Israelites) God protects them; he is their celebrated king. ( Groot Nieuws

    Bijbel , 1986)

    Therefore, Israel cant be struck neither by !w

  • 7/27/2019 d2otfcr

    4/4

    - So, the mention of some earthly king in verse 5 is not integrated in our chapter, so

    it must be secondary, together with verse 4a.- But, says Crsemann, this requires assumptions which are too complicated.- So there is no other possibility than this, that in verse 5 we have a reference to the

    kingship of Jahwe.- Theologically, this verse could be a conscious anti-image for the rise of the first

    Israelite kingdoms (82), especially those of Saul and David. It states that Jahwe is

    the only legitimate and superior king of Israel. This contradicts overtly the kingship

    traditions from Jerusalem.- This view we have already discerned in Nmb 23. But also on other points can we

    find similarities between these chapters from Numbers and Deuteronomy :

    *the image of Israels living apart from the surrounding nations ( Dt 33:28, Nmb

    23:9), referring to a period pre-dating Davids inclusion of Canaanite cities and

    other non-Israelite territories in Israel;

    *pre-monarchial traditions: theopany, Sinai- and Exodus-traditions;

    *the image of Israel as a tribal people.- These texts could thus safely be dated after the formation of the monarchial state

    more precisely: the Salomonic period and before the collapse of the Northern

    Empire.- A central point of attention in this discussion should be that the concept of (Jahwe

    s) kingship is to be intimately linked with Israels political security.

    4