dac working party on development finance statistics policy
TRANSCRIPT
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1
Unclassified English - Or. English
18 February 2021
Development Co-operation Directorate
Development Assistance Committee
DAC Working Party on Development Finance Statistics
Policy on harmonisation of coding of the financing instrument UN inter-agency
Pooled Funds between OECD-DAC and UN data standards
Informal meeting of the Working Party on Development Finance Statistics (WP-STAT)
3-5 March 2021 - Virtual meeting
This room document, prepared by the UN Chief Executives Board (CEB) Secretariat, provides advice
on which UN funds can be considered multilateral. The document is circulated for INFORMATION
under item 4 of the draft annotated agenda of the WP-STAT of 3-5 March.
Contacts: Ms Carmen Jiménez González ([email protected]); Ms Henriette Keijzers
JT03471456
OFDE
This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory,
to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
2 DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1
Unclassified
Policy on harmonisation of coding of the financing
instrument UN inter-agency Pooled Funds between OECD-
DAC and UN data standards
Background
1. The United Nations (UN) system through the Secretariat of the UN Chief
Executives Board for Coordination (CEB Secretariat) is working with the Secretariat of the
Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation’s Development Assistance
Committee (OECD-DAC) and the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) on the
harmonisation of code lists used for each of the six data standards for UN system-wide
reporting of financial data. This collaborative process started in 2017 during the
formulation of the UN data standards and has continued after the adoption of these
standards in late 2018. This policy relates to the harmonisation of code lists used for
Standard IV: UN Grant financing instruments.
2. In August 2020, the OECD-DAC Working Party on Development Finance
Statistics (WP-STAT) adopted the ‘Revised Proposal on Refinements to the Type of
Aid/Cooperation Modality Classification’, taking effect in principle on 1 January 2021.
The proposal was developed in consultation with the UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office
(MPTF Office) and the CEB Secretariat, and contains a mapping of the revised OECD-
DAC cooperation modalities to the UN Grant financing instruments (see Annex 1).
3. In subsequent discussions in the WP-STAT, OECD Members raised questions on
the reporting on general contributions to some UN inter-agency pooled funds, that – in line
with the earlier OECD-DAC classification system and reporting directives – had until then
been classified as recipients of “core” and “multilateral” funding in the OECD-DAC
system. This was notably the case for the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) and
the Peacebuilding Fund. The OECD-DAC Secretariat requested the CEB Secretariat and
MPTF Office to provide a recommendation on those UN inter-agency pooled funds,
general/non-earmarked contributions to which could/should be considered as multilateral
in the OECD-DAC system.
4. This policy on harmonisation of coding of the financing instrument UN inter-
agency Pooled Funds between OECD-DAC and UN data standards outlines the criteria that
DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1 3
Unclassified
individual UN pooled funds have to fulfil in order for the UN through the CEB Secretariat
to recommend to the OECD-DAC to classify them as ‘multilateral’ in the OECD-DAC
reporting system. The draft policy was prepared by the CEB Secretariat in its capacity as
the data steward for the UN data standards and reviewed by OECD/DAC Secretariat, IATI,
Development Coordination Office (DCO) and MPTF Office; inputs have been integrated
into this final version, which will be shared with the OECD-DAC Secretariat in order to
prepare a response to the WP-STAT.
Principles guiding policy
1. CEB Secretariat’s role as data steward for UN Data Standards: As the data
steward, the CEB Secretariat is responsible for developing policies that require an
interpretation of the UN data standards and approving these policies after an
appropriate consultation process.
2. Compliance with UN Data Standards: This policy cannot change the UN data
standards and must be fully aligned with these standards.
3. Advancing harmonization of codes between OECD-IATI-CEB: This policy is
meant to be effective in advancing the harmonization of the separate code lists for
financial reporting maintained by OECD-DAC, IATI and the CEB Secretariat,
thereby enhancing the overall transparency in reporting on financial flows of the
United Nations and other development partners.
4. Clarity for all partners: The policy is formulated so that it can be used by a UN
and non-UN audience. In its application, it uses data sources that are in the public
domain.
5. Easy to implement: The policy is formulated such that it is easy to implement and
involves only a limited workload on the part of the CEB Secretariat.
Policy on harmonisation of coding of the financing instrument UN Pooled Funds
5. The CEB Secretariat recommends to the OECD-DAC that the classification as
‘multilateral’ in the OECD-DAC reporting system (see definition in the existing
OECD-DAC reporting directives in annex 2) of any unearmarked contribution to a
global UN inter-agency pooled fund be based on the specific criteria outlined below.
The criteria for ‘Multilateral Character’ of the fund are the following:
The fund has received contributions in the last four years from ten or more
contributors that are either UN Member States or the European Union (which is a
full member of the OECD-DAC)1;
A least 80 per cent of the total contributions to the fund received in the last four
year have originated from UN Member States and the European Union; and
1 The ‘multilateral character’ of the fund thus becomes “comparable” to the multilateral character of UN Funds and Programmes,
which are established by the General Assembly and normally receive core contributions from at least ten core contributors. The four-year period coincides with the duration of the period covered by the QCPR and of the strategic plans of many of the UNSDG members. The explicit reference to a specific global pooled fund in the UN system-wide financing architecture for humanitarian and/or development activities, such as in the context of the 2016 World Humanitarian Summit or the 2019 Funding Compact, is another element to consider.
4 DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1
Unclassified
The average annual contribution to the fund is above USD 25 million per year.
Thus, the total contributions to a given fund would surpass 100 million in a four
years period.2
The criteria for ‘Contribution Character’ are the following:
Only pooled funds that are global in nature, i.e. not geographically earmarked to a
country, group of countries or region, are considered for inclusion on the list.
The percentage of total contributions to the fund that are earmarked by contributors
(e.g. to a sector/theme within the fund) is less than 5 per cent;
None of contributors to the fund has contributed more than 50 per cent of total
contributions;
6. This policy will be applicable to all UN Pooled Funds irrespective of the UN Fund
Administrator / Administrative Agent.
Implementation of the Policy
1. Based on the policy and the analysis included in annex 3, the CEB Secretariat will
recommend to the OECD-DAC that the following four global UN Pooled Funds would be
classified as recipients of “multilateral” funding in the OECD-DAC system. Note that this
recommendation does not affect the classification of the revenue and expenditures of these
funds in the UN data standards under UN inter-agency pooled funds.
Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)
Joint SDG Fund (new)
Peacebuilding Fund
UN COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund (new)
2. In practice, the multilateral character of the contribution could be identified through the
bi_multi code 2 (it is recommended that the co-operation modality would remain B031 for
all UN pooled funds in line with the definition approved by WP-STAT members and the
classification of UN pooled funds as a separate UN grant financing instrument as per the
UN data standards).
3. Moreover, the CEB Secretariat will commit to the OECD-DAC to provide an annual
update, if any, of this list by 31 January of a given calendar year.
4. For UN Fund Administrators that consider that (an) additional UN Pooled Fund(s) they
administer should be included in the list, they should send a request to that effect to the
CEB Secretariat with a copy to DCO by 10 January of a given calendar year,
complemented with a justification of the request in line with this policy.
7. The UN Fund Administrator for the two pooled funds now recommended to be
added to the list of global UN Pooled Funds considered as ‘multilateral’ by OECD-DAC
will commit to provide the requested annual reporting to the OECD-DAC on the outflows
2 This is roughly the level of overall 2018 revenue of some of the smallest UN organisations such as UN World Tourism
Organisation (UNWTO) and the UN Institute for Training and research (UNITAR).
DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1 5
Unclassified
from these two pooled funds. This is similar to the reporting currently already being done
for the CERF and the Peacebuilding Fund.
8. Reference to this policy will be included in the UN data standards under FAQ
during the annual update of the data standards, but only after its application has been
approved at the level of OECD-DAC and integrated in the OECD-DAC reporting
directives.
9. The CEB Secretariat will review and update – if needed - this policy once per year
in January, to coincide with the annual review and update op the UN data standards.
Other issues
10. While preparing this policy, the CEB Secretariat has also reflected on other areas
in which further alignment between OECD-DAC channel codes and the UN data standards
is deemed useful. One area concerned some programmes that are named “trust funds” in
the UN-system financial context and have a separate OECD-DAC channel code, and that
are not classified by the UN system as either “UN inter-agency pooled fund” or “UN single-
agency thematic funds”. These “trust fund” are now listed in the parent category 41600
“Existing UN channels not included in Standard I - UN entity - of the UN Data Cube
reporting framework” based on the parent categories agreed at the WP-STAT December
2020 meeting.
11. The CEB Secretariat identified the respective UN entities, as per UN data standards,
that host these trust funds, and suggested that the link between the “trust fund” and UN
entity is clearly spelled out in the OECD-DAC reporting system. This suggestion has been
taken over and, as a result e.g., the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture
will now be indicated as being a sub entity of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights (OHCHR) in the notes column of the channel code classification.
12. Further, the CEB Secretariat has suggested that the “trust funds” classified as being
sub-entities in category 41600 are classified as B032 or B033 in terms of the OECD-DAC
co-operation modality; apart from the Montreal Protocol, they do not comply with the
criteria for being B031, but neither are they project-type interventions.
13. Moreover, a quick analysis was undertaken to see if these “trust funds” would
comply with key eligibility criteria for multilateral as described above for UN pooled funds.
The CEB Secretariat notes that all but two3 of the channels that will be listed under parent
code 41600 did not meet the “average annual contribution” criterium of USD 25 million
per year. With the exception of the Montreal Protocol and the United Nations Mine Action
Service (UNMAS), the total contributions to these “UN sub-entities” listed in 41600 is
estimated to be around the same magnitude or less than the total annual contributions of
the two UN pooled funds that have been recommended above to be classified as multilateral
aid.
3 The Montreal Protocol and UNMAS would meet the three criteria mentioned above for
“multilateral character” based on the information available on
http://www.multilateralfund.org/85/English/1/8503.pdf and https://unmas.org/en/how-we-are-
funded.
6 DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1
Unclassified
Annex 1 – Mapping of OECD/DAC cooperation modalities to UN Data
Standard IV – UN Grant Financing Instruments
DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1 7
Unclassified
Annex 2 - Existing OECD-DAC reporting directives
14. The definition of a multilateral contribution in the OECD-DAC Reporting
[DCD/DAC/STAT(2018)9] is as follows:
15. “17.” The definition of a multilateral contribution is based on two criteria: the
multilateral character of the recipient institution and the multilateral character of the
contribution. Donors’ contributions that satisfy both criteria by meeting the following tests
should be recorded under the heading "multilateral":
a) the recipient institution conducts all or part of its activities in favour of development
and developing countries; and
b) the recipient institution i) is an international agency, institution or organisation whose
members are governments, who are represented at the highest decision-taking level by
persons acting in an official capacity and not as individuals; or ii) is a fund managed
autonomously by a multilateral agency as defined in i); and
c) funds are pooled so that they lose their identity and become an integral part of the
recipient institution’s financial assets.
16. [Conditions a) and b) define the multilateral character of the agency. Condition c)
is a test of the multilateral character of the contribution.]
17. “18.” If it is not immediately clear whether funds provided to a multilateral
organisation can be considered as pooled, determination is made on the basis of the degree
of control over the disposal of the funds contributed. If, on scrutiny, it is found that the
donor country has maintained control over its contributions to such an extent that the
decisions regarding disposal of the funds are on balance taken at the donor’s discretion, the
flows concerned should be recorded as bilateral (these contributions are often referred to
as “multi-bi” or “earmarked” contributions). The relevant criteria are the extent to which
the donor country rather than the recipient institution specifies some or all of the following:
the recipient to which the funds will be granted or lent (particular emphasis is
placed on this criterion);
the project and purpose for which the funds are to be used;
the amount provided and its terms;
in the case of loans, the re-utilisation of amortisation and interest received.”
8 DCD/DAC/STAT/RD(2021)1
Unclassified
Annex 3 – Application of the proposed policy to global UN Pooled
Funds
UN Pooled Fund Name (only Funds with
contributions in 2019)
Administrative
Agent (UN Entity)
10 or more UN MS
or EU contributors
UN MS and EU > 80
% contributions
Average 2019-2020
contribution > 25 mill.
% of contributions
earmarked < 5 %
none of contributors
contribute > 50 %
Antimicrobial Resistance MPTF MPTF-O yes yes
ConflictRelatedSexualViolence MPTF-O yes yes yes
Counter Piracy Trust Fund MPTF-O yes yes
Elsie Initiative Fund MPTF-O yes yes
Financing Strategy 2030 Agenda MPTF-O yes yes
Human Rights Mainstreaming TF MPTF-O yes yes
Joint SDG Fund MPTF-O yes yes yes yes yes
Migration MPTF MPTF-O yes yes
One Planet MPTF MPTF-O yes yes
Partnership Act. on Green Econ MPTF-O yes yes
Peacebuilding Fund MPTF-O yes yes yes yes yes
Rural Women Economic Empowermt MPTF-O yes yes
SDG Fund MPTF-O yes yes
Spotlight Initiative Fund MPTF-O yes yes
The Lions Share Fund MPTF-O yes
UN REDD Programme Fund MPTF-O yes yes
UN Road Safety Trust Fund MPTF-O yes yes
UNITLIFE Trust Fund MPTF-O yes yes
UNPRPD Disability Fund MPTF-O yes yes yes
Womens Peace & Humanitarian TF MPTF-O yes yes
Working for Health MPTF MPTF-O yes yes
Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF)** OCHA yes yes yes yes yes
UN-Water Inter-Agency Trust Fund ** UNOPS yes ?
yes
UN Pooled Fund Name (Funds with MPTFO as AA,
established & capitalised in 2020)
Administrative
Agent (UN Entity)
10 or more UN MS
or EU contributors
UN MS and EU > 80
% contributions
2020 contribution > 25
mill.
% of contributions
earmarked < 15 %
non of contributors
contribute > 50 %
Generation Unlimited Trust Fd MPTF-O yes
Global Fund for Coral Reefs MPTF-O yes
UN COVID-19 Response & Recover MPTF-O yes yes yes yes yes
Note: Funds with (*) have a separate OECD/DAC CRS channel code, and their code is used instead of the channel of the administrative agent in OECD/DAC reporting
Note: Funds with ** were assessed using UN Pooled Funds database (for 2017-2019) and cerf.un.org/our-donors/contributions (for 2020); others were assessed using mptf.undp.org
CONTRIBUTIONS CHARACTER MULTILATERAL CHARACTERGlobal UN inter-agency Pooled Funds