dale bentz, phillip halleck, abraham grader, and john roberts rilem conference- volume changes of...
TRANSCRIPT
Dale Bentz, Phillip Halleck, Abraham Grader, and John Roberts RILEM Conference- Volume Changes of Hardening Concrete:
Testing and MitigationAugust 2006
Outline
• Need for internal curing– Blended cements
• “Undercuring” with internal curing
• Microtomography observations of water movement during internal curing– Quantitative analysis of 3-D images
• Mixture proportioning for internal curing
What is internal curing (IC)?
Answer: As being considered by ACI-308, “internal curing refers to the process by which the hydration of cement occurs because of the availability of additional internal water that is not part of the mixing water.”
For many years, we have been curing concrete from the outside in, internal curing is for curing from the inside out. Internal water is generally supplied via internal reservoirs, such as saturated lightweight fine aggregates, superabsorbent polymers, or saturated wood fibers.
Why do we need IC?
Answer: Particularly in HPC, it is not easily possible to provide curing water from the top surface (for example) at the rate that is required to satisfy the ongoing chemical shrinkage, due to the extremely low permeabilities that are often achieved in the concrete as the capillary pores depercolate.
Capillary pore percolation/depercolation first noted by Powers, Copeland and Mann (PCA-1959).
How does IC work?Answer: IC distributes the extra curing water
(uniformly) throughout the entire 3-D concrete microstructure so that it is more readily available to maintain saturation of the cement paste during hydration, avoiding self-desiccation (in the paste) and reducing autogenous shrinkage.
Because the autogenous stresses are inversely proportional to the diameter of the pores being emptied, for IC to do its job, the individual pores in the internal reservoirs should be much larger than the typical sizes of the capillary pores (micrometers) in hydrating cement paste and should also be well connected (percolated).
Blended Cements• Internal curing can be particularly important in
high-performance (low w/cm) blended cement systems– Increased chemical shrinkage of pozzolanic and slag
reactions• Cement: 0.06 to 0.07 mL/g cement• Silica fume: 0.22 mL/g cement• Slag: ~ 0.18 mL/g cement• Fly ash (Type F): ~ 0.12 to 0.16 mL/g cement
– Possible earlier depercolation of capillary pores and reduced permeability limiting water transport distances within the hydrating blended cement paste microstructure
Autogenous Deformation Results
IC added via fine LWA to increase total “w/c” from 0.30 to 0.38 or 0.40
Note – chemical shrinkage of pozzolanic reactionof silica fume with CH is ~0.22 g water/g silica fume or
about 3.2 times that of cement
w/c=0.3 HPM silica fume blended cement
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56
Time (d)
Mic
rost
rain
Control
IC - 8
IC - 10
Autogenous Deformation Results
IC added via fine LWA to increase total “w/c” from 0.30 to 0.38
Note – chemical shrinkage of slag hydraulic reactionsis ~0.18 g water/g slag or about 2.6 times that of
cement
w/c=0.3 HPM slag blended cement
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56
Time (d)
Mic
rost
rain
Control
IC
“Undercuring” with Internal Curing
• Hydrating cement paste is a complex and dynamic porous media and as such, internal curing mixture proportions that supply only part of the total needed water (demand) can potentially exhibit some interesting results as illustrated in the schematic on the following slide
Empty and Full PoresSaturated curing Sealed curing
RH = 98 % RH = 93 %
Sufficient Internal curing
IC Reservoir Cement paste
RH = 97 %
Insufficient Internal curing
Cement paste
RH = 90 %
IC Reservoir
Better hydrationOnly pores in reservoirs empty
Some increase in hydrationPores in both reservoirsand paste empty
Cement pasteCement paste
Less hydrationLargest pores in paste empty
Four-Dimensional X-ray Microtomography
• X-ray microtomography allows direct observation of the 3-D microstructure of cement-based materials– Example: Visible Cement Data Set
http://visiblecement.nist.gov
• In October 2005, experiments were conducted at Pennsylvania State University to monitor three-dimensional water movement during internal curing of a high-performance mortar over the course of two days (time is the 4th dimension)
Mixture ProportionsTable 1. Mixture proportions for the control and IC high-performance mortars. Material Control Mortar Mass IC Mortar Mass Cement 984.6 g (2.17 lb) 953.3 g (2.10 lb) Water 344.6 g (0.759 lb) 333.7 g (0.735 lb)
Sand (total) 1870.8 g (4.12 lb) 1529.4 g (3.37 lb) F95 fine sand 467.7 g (1.03 lb) 452.8 g (0.997 lb)
Graded sand (ASTM C778) 355.4 g (0.783 lb) 344.1 g (0.758 lb) 20-30 sand (ASTM C778) 355.4 g (0.783 lb) 287.8 g (0.634 lb)
S16 coarse sand 692.2 g (1.52 lb) 444.7 g (0.980 lb) LWA (SSD) --- 183.6 g (0.404 lb)
Water in LWA --- 35.2 g (0.0775 lb)
w/c = 0.35Blend of four sands (Ferraris) to improve particle packingLWA added in saturated surface dry (SSD) condition
SSD specific gravity of 1.7
Commercial cement – no particles larger than 30 μm diameterHydration conducted at 30 oC
maintained by circulating fluid from a temperature controlled bath
After mixing 1 d hydration 2 d hydration
Subtraction: 1 d – after mixing
Aqua indicates dryingRed indicates wetting
All images are 13 mm by 13 mm
Three-dimensional subtracted imageof 1 d hydration – initial microstructureshowing water-filled pores that have
emptied during internal curing (4.6 mm on a side)
2-D image with water evacuatedregions (pores) overlaid on
original microstructure(4.6 mm by 4.6 mm)
Four-Dimensional X-ray Microtomography
Quantitative Analysis
• Four-dimensional image sets analyzed to estimate volume of water moving from LWA to cement paste during first 2 d of hydration
• Analysis based on changes in greylevel histogram with time
• Results compared to conventional measures of hydration including chemical shrinkage, non-evaporable water content, and heat release
Preprocessing of 3-D Image Data
PoresLWA
Sand
Paste
Empty
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Th
ou
san
ds
Greylevel value
Pix
el c
ou
nt
no filter
median3
median5
Median filter applied to remove noise and sharpen greylevel histogram
Temporal Analysis of Greylevel Histograms
PoresLWA
Sand
Paste
Empty
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
Th
ou
san
ds
Greylevel value
Pix
el c
ou
nt
1 h
26.5 h
47 h
Change in “empty” pores with time quantified
Tomography Water Movement vs. Hydration Measures
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0 12 24 36 48
Time (h)
Vo
lum
e fr
acti
on
or
CS
0.00
0.12
0.24
0.36
0.48
0.60
LO
I o
r sc
aled
hea
t re
leas
e
<= 3500 <=3900Chemical shrinkage Heat releaseLOI (paste) LOI (IC mortar)
Good ”quantitative” agreement between estimated water movement volume and other measures of hydration
Four-Dimensional X-ray Microtomography
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0 12 24 36 48
Time (h)
Vo
lum
e fr
acti
on
or
CS
Scaled <=3900 Chemical shrinkage
Empty porosity within LWA from analysis of 3-D microtomography data sets scales “exactly” with measured chemical shrinkage of the cement for first 36 h of curing
Mixture Proportioning for Internal CuringQuestions to Consider When Using IC
• How much water (or LWA) do I need to supply for internal curing?
• How far can the water travel from the surfaces of the internal reservoirs?
• How are the internal reservoirs distributed within the 3-D concrete microstructure?
Answers
May be found at the NIST internal curing web site: http://ciks.cbt.nist.gov/lwagg.html
How much water (or LWA) do I need to supply for internal curing?
Answer: Equation for mixture proportioning(Menu selection #1)
MLWA =mass of (dry) LWA needed per unit volume of concreteCf =cement factor (content) for concrete mixtureCS =(measured via ASTM C 1608-05 or computed) chemical shrinkage of cementαmax =maximum expected degree of hydration of cement, [(w/c)/0.36] or 1S =degree of saturation of LWA (0 to 1] when added to mixtureøLWA = (measured) absorption of lightweight aggregate (use desorption measured
at 93 % RH (potassium nitrate saturated salt solution) via ASTM C 1498–04a)
)*/()**( max LWAfLWA SCSCM
How far can the water travel from the surfaces of the LWA?
Answer: Equation balancing water needed (hydration) vs. water available (flow) (Menu selection #2)
“Reasonable” estimates ---
early hydration ---- 20 mm
middle hydration --- 5 mm
late hydration --- 1 mm or less
“worst case” --- 0.25 mm (250 μm)
Early and middle hydration estimates in agreement with x-ray absorption-based observations on mortars during curing
How are the internal reservoirs distributed within the 3-D concrete microstructure?
Answer: Simulation using NIST Hard Core/Soft Shell (HCSS) Computer Model (Menu selections #3 and #4)
Returns a table of “protected paste
fraction” as a function of distance
from LWA surface
Yellow – Saturated LWARed – Normal weight sandBlues – Pastes within various
distances of an LWA
10 mm by 10 mm
Mortar from μCT experiment97 % of paste within 2 mm of LWA
Summary• Internal curing especially critical in high
performance blended cement systems• Too little internal curing can actually
result in a lower internal RH than in a system with no internal curing
• X-ray microtomography can be used to “observe” water movement during internal curing in four dimensions
• Internet tools exist to assist in mixture proportioning for internal curing