dale p. bentz ([email protected]) national institute of standards and technology international...
TRANSCRIPT
Dale P. Bentz ([email protected])National Institute of Standards and Technology
International Congress on the Chemistry of CementJuly 10, 2007
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Time (h)
Hea
t R
elea
se (
J/g
cem
ent)
Coarse-1 Coarse-2
Fine-1 Fine-2
Type II limit Type IV limit
Background
• Abundance of Computer Models for Predicting Performance of Cement-Based Materials– HIPERPAV, FEMMASSE, DuCoM, Life-365, CIKS, VCCTL
• Such models could form the basis for the development of virtual standards
• Just as with the development of a physical test method, virtual test methods must be verified and validated, and their variability considered
Outline• Some definitions
– Verification– Validation– Calibration– Variability
• Example of a virtual test method for heat of hydration– Conventionally measured by ASTM C186
• Summary and Prospectus
Verification• “The process of determining that a model
implementation accurately represents the developer’s conceptual description of the model and the solution to the model” from http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/tutorial/glossary.html
• Answers the question “Are we building the model right?”– Are our equations correct?– Do we have the correct (best) values for all
parameters?– Is our computer code bug-free?
Validation• “The process of determining the degree to
which a model is an accurate representation of the real world from the perspective of the intended users of the model” from http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/tutorial/glossary.html
• Answers the question “Are we building the right model?”– Are our predictions accurate and useful for our
intended audience?– Does the model contribute to new technical insights
and innovations?
Calibration• “The process of adjusting numerical or physical
modeling parameters in the computational model for the purpose of improving agreement with experimental data” from http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/tutorial/glossary.html
Variability• Assessment of the change in model predictions
when one or more input parameters are modified in a controlled manner– For a simulation, could be the random number seed– Could be an input parameter characterizing the
system being modeled• Phase fractions and/or phase perimeters (surface fractions)• Phase correlation functions• Particle size distribution (PSD)• Activation energies
A Physical Testing Analogy• Compressive strength of high performance
concrete (HPC)• Verification – Are we building the test method
right?– Capping materials, strain rates, consolidation
• Carino et al. references in conference paper
• Validation – Are we building the right test method?– Is compressive strength the best measure to
characterize the performance of HPC?• Early-age cracking, durability and transport measures may
be more appropriate– Goodspeed, Vanikar, and Cook, Concrete International, 1996.
Virtual Test Method Example• Virtual Heat of Hydration Test
– ASTM C186 is the only current physical test method for heat of hydration within ASTM
• Few laboratories have the necessary equipment• Results only available after waiting 7 d or 28 d• Cumbersome- acid dissolution of samples, etc.• w/c=0.4, sealed hydration at 23 °C
– Virtual test method is based on CEMHYD3D v3.0 model (freely available via Internet download at ftp://ftp.nist.gov/pub/bfrl/bentz/CEMHYD3D/version30)
• Validation performed using a set of 5 CCRL cements• Two variants:
– Complete PSD, SEM/X-ray image characterization– PSD and X-ray diffraction (XRD) volumetric phase analysis only
Enthalpy of Hydration of Cement Phases
Phase Enthalpy (kJ/kg phase)
C3S 517
C2S 262
C3A 908, 1672, 1144A
C4AF 418, 725B
Anhydrite (to gypsum) 187
Hemihydrate (to gypsum) 132
A For C3A hydration, values are for conversion to C3AH6, ettringite, and monosulfate (Afm) phase,
respectively.B For C4AF hydration, values are for conversion to C3AH6 and ettringite, respectively.
Virtual Test Method Procedure
1) obtain a physical sample of the cement of interest and characterize it with respect to PSD and volumetric phase composition based on SEM/X-ray image analysis or X-ray diffraction (standards for the PSD and phase characterization methods are currently being pursued in the ASTM C01.25 and ASTM C01.23 subcommittees, respectively),
2) prepare a w/c=0.4 (23 °C) cement paste specimen and measure its chemical shrinkage according to the ASTM C 1608 test method, during at least the first 8 h of hydration; use the measured response to calibrate the kinetics factor, β, that connects model hydration cycles to time in the CEMHYD3D v3.0 computer model, for this virtual cement hydration (w/c=0.4, saturated hydration at 23 °C) ,
3) using the same calibrated kinetics factor, conduct a virtual heat of hydration experiment (w/c=0.4, sealed hydration at 23 °C) with CEMHYD3D v3.0 to obtain the 7 d and 28 d (and other) heat of hydration values for comparison to the experimentally measured values from the ASTM C 186 test method,
4) optionally, conduct virtual (semi)adiabatic hydrations, etc. to estimate the (semi)adiabatic temperature rise of concrete mixtures of interest produced with this cement
C3S=red, C2S=blue, C3A=green, C4AF=orange,gypsum=olive, CaO=yellow, K2SO4=white
Measurement of Chemical Shrinkage• Chemical shrinkage assesses the imbibition of external water into a
hydrating cement paste due to the fact that the hydration products occupy less volume than the reactants
• Standardized in 2005 as ASTM C1608 by subcommittee C01.31• Burrows has advocated that the 12-h chemical shrinkage be less
than or equal to 0.0105 mL/g cement for a crack resistant cement (Burrows, et al., Three Simple Tests for Selecting Low-Crack Cement, Cement and Concrete Composites, 26 (5), 509-519, 2004.)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168
Time (h)
Ch
emic
al s
hri
nka
ge
(mL
/g c
emen
t)
Coarse Fine380 m2/kg311
CCRL Cement Compositions
Phase CCRL 115 CCRL 116 CCRL 135 CCRL 141 CCRL 152
C3S 0.596 0.627 0.634 0.632 0.690
C2S 0.218 0.207 0.162 0.106 0.088
C3A 0.031 0.067 0.066 0.115 0.123
C4AF 0.095 0.034 0.078 0.073 0.038
Gypsum 0.060 0.065 0.060 0.026 0.027
Hemihydrate Not meas. Not meas. Not meas. 0.048 0.031
Anhydrite Not meas. Not meas. Not meas. 0.000 0.003
Volume fractions
Chemical Shrinkage Results
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (h)
Ch
emic
al s
hri
nka
ge
(mL
/g c
em)
Measured
CEMHYD3D
CEMHYD3D (vol only)
CCRL Cement 141, w/c=0.4, saturated, 20 °C
Heat of Hydration Results
0
100
200
300
400
500
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Time (d)
Hea
t re
leas
e (J
/g) CCRL average
CEMYHD3D
CEMHYD3D (vol only)
CCRL Cement 141, w/c=0.4, sealed, 23 °C
Heat of Hydration ResultsCCRL
cementAge (d)
(# of labs)
CCRL C186 heat of hyd.
(J/g)
CCRL std. dev.
(J/g)
CEMHYD3D heat of hyd.
(J/g)
|Model-Meas.|/(Meas. dev.)
115 7 (27) 310.9 27.6 305.3 0.20
115 28 (16) 368.6 21.8 346.3 1.02
116 7 (27) 359.8 25.9 339.6 0.78
116 28 (16) 402.1 17.2 383.0 1.11
135 7 (22) 326.4 21.8 327.4 0.05
135 28 (15) 360.2 19.2 375.0 0.77
141 7 (18) 351.1 30.96 344.2 0.22
141 28 (11) 380.7 36.4 399.6 0.52
152 7 (22) 362.8 30.96 373.6 0.35
152 28 (18) 415 23.85 419.0 0.17
152-1 7 (22) 362.8 30.96 374.2 0.37
152-1 28 (18) 415 23.85 416.6 0.07
152-2 7 (22) 362.8 30.96 369.2 0.21
152-2 28 (18) 415 23.85 416.4 0.06
Variability – Random Number Seed
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (h)
Ch
emic
al s
hri
nka
ge
(mL
/g c
em)
Measured average
CEMHYD3D
CEMHYD3D-rep1
CEMHYD3D-rep2
0
100
200
300
400
500
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Time (d)
Hea
t re
leas
e (J
/g)
CCRL average
CEMHYD3D
CEMHYD3D-rep1
CEMHYD3D-rep2
CCRL cement 152
Summary and Prospectus• Virtual testing has shifted the emphasis from a later age
physical measurement to a detailed starting material characterization and an accompanying early-age (8 h) chemical shrinkage measurement
• Results demonstrate the feasibility of a virtual heat of hydration test method to predict 7 d and 28 d heats of hydration (actually the complete heat of hydration vs. time curve)
• Cement characterization can be based on detailed SEM/X-ray image analysis or on more commonly available XRD volume fractions, along with a measured PSD (of course)
• Methodology now being considered by ASTM C01.26