damage assessment report for crpf campus,...
TRANSCRIPT
Damage Assessment Report
For
CRPF campus, Gwalior (M.P)
For the purpose of
“Prior Environment Clearance for proposed 5 Nos. 240 Men Barracks including
Electrical Works for Group Centre at CRPF Gwalior (M.P.) at Village Panihar,
Gwalior
Project By
Central Reserve Police Force,
Gwalior (M.P)
Environment Consultant
Vaishali Tambat Executive Director
M/s Mantras Green Resources Ltd. (Engineers & Environmental Consultant)
Flat No. 104, A Wing Shanti Dham Infront of Triveni Gardens,
Adharwadi Chowk, Kalyan (W) – 421301
Mobile: 9867851056
Introduction
The Central Reserve Police Force did the agreement between Governor of Madhya Pradesh for
handing over of Government land to CRPF development. The CRPF has received 87.506 Ha
land on 8.12.2000 for Group centre, 60 Ha land on 17.12.2003 for Firing range purpose and 85
Ha on 22.10.2005 for CTC IV.
The CRPF is developing the land as per the orders and funds sanctioned by Home Ministry,
Delhi. The CRPF is developing land since allotment of land i.e. from year 2000.
Till date CRPF has developed Firing range, CTC Training ground, Admistration office, Hospital,
School and Grocery market etc. All above structure sanctions were came in parts. Some
sanctions were prior to 2006 notification and some were after that. But the sanctions after 2006
Notification were of having building construction area less than 20,000 sq.mt. Hence the CRPF
campus which is developed till date is as per the norms and approvals applicable.
This developed CRPF campus was very old campus in Gwalior erected for training purpose for
CRPF candidates. They have received funds for developments of quarters and barracks within
the same campus from Central government on 6th May 2016.
This CRPF campus is a training institute for which many troops visit the campus. The
Development of Residential quarters is for the officer’s visiting the campus and Barracks
development is for the student’s who visit the campus for training purpose.
All these type of barracks are occupied by CTC & GC troops and throughout the year officers
training programme are arranged by CRPF. Hence CRPF had not applied for the prior
environment clearance for the Barrack and Quarters Development project though it has the
construction area more than 20,000 sq.mt as per notification 22.12.2014.
But later on it was realized that the same construction is allied construction of residence to
support the training institute. Hence CRPF applied for Environment Clearance to MPSEIAA
though the construction is started at site.
But as per 14.3.2017 notification, "any project which had started construction at site prior to
Environment clearance, even the category B projects will be considered for Environment
clearance by Expert Appraisal Committee and environmental clearance will be granted at the
Central level".
Hence Now CRPF wish to withdraw the proposal from MPSEIAA and want to apply at
EAC, central level as per the procedure mentioned in the 14.3.2017 notification.
The proposal No. submitted to MP – SEIAA as follows:
Barrack construction project: SIA/MP/NCP/63236/2017 dated 23rd March 2017
Hence as per the notification dated 14.3.2017 we are hereby submitting the Damage Assessment
report for further assessment.
Proposed Layout Plan of Barrack
There are 3 Barracks of 240 men each already existed in CRPF campus. As per 6th May 2016
sanction there were now total 5 Barracks of 240 men each are proposed opposite to the existing
Barrack. The same is highlighted in above drawing in grey colour.
Table no. 1: Details of Buildings proposed
Sr. No. Barracks Capacity Configuration
1 5 Nos. Barracks 24 Halls each of Capacity of 10
Soldiers
G + 3
Table no. 2: Area Statement of Barracks
Description EC Proposed (Sq. m)
Total Plot Area 14,060
RG area 6,817
Total Ground coverage area 7,243
Open area available 7,030
Total Construction area 21,316.15
Table no. 3: Details of Construction done till date i.e. May 2017
Google Image of Year 2015 showing the 3 Existing Barracks
Google Image of Year 2016 showing the construction of 4 new Barracks out of 5 new
Proposed Barracks.
Google Image of Year 2015 earmarked with reference to development area of Barrack
Google Image of Year 2016 earmarked with reference to development area of Barrack
Details of Polygon marked on Google Earth
Name Shape
Type
Area
(Sq
Meters)
Perimeter /
Length
(Kilometers)
Centroid /
Mid-Point
(Degrees)
Bounding Box
Maximum
(Degrees)
Bounding Box
Minimum
(Degrees)
Area of
Barrack Polygon 57,591 1.4
26.1100756°,
078.0561143°
26.1113595°,
078.0586445°
26.1090875°,
078.0534759°
Name Shape
Type
Area
(Sq
Mete
rs)
Perimeter
/Length
(Kilomete
rs)
Centroid/Mid-
Point
(Degrees)
Bounding
Box
Maximum
(Degrees)
Bounding Box
Minimum
(Degrees)
Area of polygon
where tree trunk
seen
Polygon 2,948 0.22 26.1113461°,
078.0557557°
26.1116046°,
078.0561665°
26.1110529°,
078.0553141°
From above images the Vegetation loss can be approximately calculated as native tree loss
of 1660 Nos.
Tree barks counted in 2948 Sq.mt area = Approximate 85 trees
Vegetation present in the CRPF campus area:
Table no. 4: Details of Loss done till date
Sr.
No.
Description of
Damage Details Damage type
Mitigation
measures already
taken at site
Mitigation
measures
proposed at site
Budget
Provision in
EMP
1. Vegetation loss The land area of
57,591sq.mt is cleared
before construction starts.
(Calculated from Google
Images)
This result in loss of
vegetation covers of land.
The assessment of type of
species and flora fauna
present in this particular
area is not possible as
already the area is cleared.
Even the old photos of sites
are not available.
Hence the judgment is
made according to
presence of surrounding
species. The Flora present
Minor as Local
species of Flora and
fauna got loss during
clearing of land.
It is envisaged that no
endangered or rare
species damage is
done at site
Total Trees cut in
affected area
(Approximate)
calculated from the
past google images as
shown above.
= 1660 nos.
CRPF has already
started plantation in
the open areas of
campus with the
help of students.
Approximate More
than 2000 trees
were planted in
campus.
CRPF will Plant
trees in 1:3 ratio
of vegetation loss.
i.e. 4980 trees will
be planted in the
campus to
compensate the
loss. More focus
will be on
plantation of
native species. List
of species is
already mentioned
in Form 1A.
Rs. 27.3 Lakhs
provision is
made for this in
EMP
in this particular area is
native species and widely
spread in this area. Even
the surrounding area is
cultivated land. As per the
group discussion with
nearby residents it is found
that local natives species of
flora and fauna are present
2. Loss of
Natural
Ground Cover
Ground coverage of
Barrack is 7,243 sq.mt. The
same will be excavated and
excavated earth = 21,729
cu.mt. but only 2,172
cu.mt is utilized in road
construction rest other will
be backfilled after footing
work.
Minor : as Excavated
earth will not be
transported to other
area but will remain
within the campus
CRPF campus has
already utilized the
excavated earth
material in filling
purpose and road
construction as site
is contoured land.
Campus has
permanent wall
construction all
around. There is
no abutting
community life
which may get
hampered because
of excavation
activity.
Day time is
preferred for
excavation to
Nil (as CPWD
has been
instructed for
construction
hence CPWD
follows the
GRIHA norms
as per their
guideline
prescribed)
avoid noise
pollution
3. Loss of Top
Soil
During construction the top
soil may get disturbed and
may get loss along with
construction debris.
Minor: As the soil
strata of this acquired
land has rocky
sedimentary rock
terrain and has very
little top soil.
As this area is
majorly rocky
terrain, due to
absence of top soil,
no retention of top
soil is proposed.
Site is devoid of
any top soil
Nil (as CPWD
has been
instructed for
construction
hence CPWD
follows the
GRIHA norms
as per their
guideline
prescribed)
4. Change in
Topography
The land development may
change the topography of
the area
Minor- as architect
has done the master
planning as per
contour and
topography of the
area.
Minimum cut and fill
is done at site.
Minimum cut and
fill is done at site.
Measures are taken
to maintain the
original topography
at site.
Proper drain
system will be
developed as per
planning
Nil (as CPWD
has been
instructed for
construction
hence CPWD
follows the
GRIHA norms
as per their
guideline
prescribed)
5. Change in run
off pattern
As per run off Calculation
previous run off at site =
0.07 cum/sec.
Run off at site after
development = 0.93
cum/sec.
Incremental run off =0.86
cum/sec.
Minor- MEP
consultant has
designed drain size as
per run off
calculation
Drain sizes as per
the run off
calculation
Hard paving will
be reduced
wherever possible
by use of Green
Paver blocks,
Recharge pits are
proposed, Rain
water Harvesting
will be done as per
RWH consultant
instructions
Rs. 3.4 Lakhs
for RWH
measures.
6. Air pollution
and Noise
pollution
During construction Air
pollution and noise
pollution is expected
because of dusting and
equipment handling
Minor- RMC Plant is
under working
RMC plant is
utilized. Workers are
given with PPE.
Water sprinkling at
site is done by
contractor on daily
basis; Compound
wall tree plantation
is in progress.
Wheel washing area
is provided.
PUC of vehicles
checked at entrance
gate.
Zero VOC paints
proposed.
DG set will be
with acoustic
Enclosure.
Adhesive and
Sealants will be
with low VOC.
Interior wood
will not use
urea-
formaldehyde as
a bonding resin.
Vehicular traffic
will be regulated
Antihonking
Boards on
strategic
locations
Provision of Rs.
1.4 Lakhs is
made in EMP for
Environment
Monitoring
especially Air,
Water, Noise and
soil
7. Ground water During construction
ground Water Pollution
may anticipate due to
Vehicular pollution
deposits and or spillage of
paints, DG oil or
antisealents / anti corrosive
chemicals which will be
used during construction.
Minor as the same
can be mitigated with
proper proposed
measures and
construction phase at
this stage has not
reached at finishing
stage hence ground
water pollution is not
envisaged.
Construction phase
not reached at
finishing stage
where paints will be
used. Hence no such
storage of material
currently at site.
Separate
impervious and
protected storage
area proposed for
storing
construction
material.
Spillage of
chemicals will be
attended
immediately with
removal of soil
layer at affected
area.
Borewell will be
protected and
covered type.
Provision of
Filtration
mechanism
before
recharging rain
water into
existing bore
well to each pit.
EMP cost for the
same is proposed
to be Rs. 5.0
lakhs.
RMC plant in working condition at site of CRPF:
Conclusion:
This project is different from other Building construction project as the proposed new
construction project of Barracks building is to support existing CRPF training centre located at
village Panihar, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. As like other project this project does not bears any
economical profit to the developer i.e. CRPF. This is the project funded by Home Ministry and
has time bound priority to complete the construction soon as delay in project inflate the project
cost and additional cost burden will affect the budget of the project.
Hence CPWD being a construction contractor has to start the project immediately after getting
release of fund. The confusion about the new EIA circular regarding the institutional building
exemption further delayed the process of prior Environment clearance. Till that time period the
CPWD has allotted the work to contractors and being time bound activity the contractor started
work at the site without knowing the approval status of Environment Clearance.
This project is purely developed to support the CRPF training. The zone in which the project is
being developed is especially reserved for development of full fledges CRPF training centre
campus in Madhya Pradesh Gwalior. The development of Barracks is purely for residing
training students.
Moreover All CPWD projects comes under PSU units and has mandate to develop the project at
least for 3 Star rating under the GRIHA scheme. Thus the project is almost fulfilling green
Criteria required as per mandate and hence no much damage is seen at site and can be assessed
due to fulfillment of green Building criteria’s.
All above points needs to be considered while assessing the damage done by the project while
developing the project without prior environment clearance.