dan proudfoot as media evaluation

25
AS Media Evaluation Dan Proudfoot

Upload: guest97732f

Post on 24-May-2015

210 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

AS Media EvaluationDan Proudfoot

Page 2: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

First, a look at the final design of my magazine

Page 3: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation
Page 4: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation
Page 5: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

How does my magazine use or challenge the conventions of music magazines?

On the following pages, I will show some comparisons between my magazine and other well established brands

Page 6: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Cover Page

Page 7: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Similarities

Page 8: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

All have a consistent colour scheme “GTMM” and “Q” share the use of keeping the logos to

a corner A large cover image taking up the majority of the cover Box-outs containing features to entice a reader in “Kerrang” and “Q” both feature banners along the top

Similarities

Page 9: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Differences

Page 10: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

“GTMM” and “Q”’s layouts are relatively simplistic and well spaced out, “Kerrang” is tight and cramped

“GTMM” does not make use of Banners along either the top or bottom

“Kerrang“ makes more use of pictures than either “Q” or “GTMM”

Differences

Page 11: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Contents Page

Page 12: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Similarities

Page 13: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

“Q” and “GTMM” both feature a banner containing the word Contents and the Issue name

“Kerrang” and “Q” share the use of many pictures. In retrospect, I would have used more pictures on “GTMM”

“GTMM” and “Kerrang” both have a message from the editor in regards of what to expect from the magazine

Similarities

Page 14: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Double Page Spread

Page 15: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Similarities

Page 16: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Blocks of text are on their own white areas to let them stand out from the background pictures

“Q” and “GTMM” contain pictures of the full band together

All contain text asking the read to carry on to the following page

Similarities

Page 17: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Differences

Page 18: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

“GTMM” uses more box outs than the other two magazines

“Kerrang” launches straight into the article, while Q and GTMM are introductory pages to their pieces

Differences

Page 19: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

How does my magazine represent social groups? I believe my magazine uses quite a

fresh and almost spartan look, which is becoming ever more popular.

This means the magazine can target the late teens/early 20’s age group, who are renowned for always being on top of fashion

Page 20: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Similarly, the name of the magazine, while generic, aims directly at the readership

The age of the cover star, and those of the featured band closely echo the age of readership.

Page 21: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Media Institutions The magazine would try to appeal to a

mainstream audience, but I believe it would have nuances that would lead it to be on the fringes of what can be defined as mainstream.

I plan for it to be more in depth than other similar magazines, if it were to be published

Page 22: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Reader Communication The language used is in-keeping with

the age range, but slightly more technical in places to appeal to those who want to know more.

The colours and images used are subtle and of a limited pallet, which is becoming fashionable. Gradients are only used when necessary, and not on every object. This also applies to drop shadows

Page 23: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

What I used to design the magazine The majority of layout

work was done using Adobe InDesign CS5

Graphics were handled in both Adobe Photoshop CS5 and Adobe Illustrator CS5

Writing work for the blog was done in Microsoft Word 2010

Page 24: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Improvements, Feedback and Personal Evaluation Suggestions for improvements have

been provided throughout, and they have been taken into account. For example:

I took this into account and applied the changes to my front cover

Page 25: Dan Proudfoot AS media evaluation

Personally, I’m happy with how this magazine resulted. The cover is pleasing to look at, and incorporates many standards of the magazine industry, while maintaining a sense of independence. The rest of the magazine follows suit, with a strong adherence to a design philosophy and colour choice. It think it impacts on the end reader effectively.