daniels11 pp.doc

27
PART FIVE GLOBAL STRATEGY, STRUCTURE, AND IMPLEMENTATION International Business Chapter Eleven The Strategy of International Business

Upload: vijay-rathi

Post on 22-Jan-2015

525 views

Category:

Business


3 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. PART FIVE GLOBAL STRATEGY, STRUCTURE,AND IMPLEMENTATION International BusinessChapter Eleven The Strategy ofInternational Business

2. Chapter Objectives

  • To examine the idea of industry structure, firm strategy, and value creation
  • To profile the features and functions of the value chain framework
  • To appreciate how managers configure and coordinate a value chain
  • To identify the dimensions that shape how managers develop strategy
  • To profile the types of strategies firms use in international business

11- 3. Introduction

  • Strategy: the framework that managers apply to determine the competitive moves and business approaches that guide a firm, i.e., the means used to achieve objectives
  • Strategy represents managements idea on how to best:
    • attract customers
    • stake out a market position
    • conduct operations
    • compete effectively
    • create value
    • achieve goals

11- 4. Fig. 11.2: The Strategy of International Business 11- 5. Fundamentals of Strategic Management:Basic Concepts

  • Perfect competitionpresumes that:
  • there are large numbers of fully informed buyers and sellers of an homogeneous product
  • buyers and sellers possess perfect information
  • there are no obstacles to the entry or exit of firms into or out of the market
  • resources are fully mobile
  • Anindustryis a group of firms, i.e., competitors, that produce products which are close substitutes.
  • Aglobal industryis one in which a firms competitive position in one country is significantly affected by its position in other countries.

11- 6. Fundamentals of Strategic Management: The IO Paradigm

  • The industry organization (IO) paradigm: risk-adjusted rates of return should be constant across firms and industries
  • O ver time no one firm or industry should consistently outperform others.
  • The performance of a firm is a function of its market conduct, which in turn is determined by the structure of its industry.
  • Industry effects explain up to 75% of the differencesin average returns for firms within a given industry.

11- 7. Industry Structure:The Five Fundamental Forces

  • The Five Fundamental Forces Model: the nature of competition in an industry is the combined out-come of competitive pressures generated by:
  • t he moves of rivals battling for market share
  • the entry of new rivals seeking market share
  • the efforts of firms outside the industry to convince buyers to switch to their substitute products
  • the push by suppliers to charge more for their inputs
  • the push by buyers to pay less for products
  • Markets are not perfectly competitive;some firms consistently outperform industry averages.

11- 8. Fig. 11.3: Industry Structure:The Five Fundamental Forces Model 11- 9.

  • The five-forces model defines the structureand competition in an industry in a waythat reveals:
  • what forces are driving changes within an industry
  • the relative strength of each fundamental force
  • which fundamental forces shape strategic conduct
  • the strategic moves rivals are likely to make
  • Common to each issue is the question of whether thecurrent or future outlook suggests that firms in the industryhave no, some, or great potential to realize profits.

11- 10. Changes in Industry Structure

  • Forces that can transform an industrys structure include:
  • changes in the long-term industry [market] growth rate
  • technological developments
  • shifting customer purchase and usage patterns
  • manufacturing innovations that revise cost and efficiency frontiers
  • changes in government regulations and policies
  • the entry or exit of major firms
  • the diffusion of business, executive, and technical expertise across countries

11- 11. Strategy and Value Creation

  • Strategy: a firms efforts to build and strengthen its competitive position within its industry in order to create value and attain goals
  • A firmscore competencymay be a special outlook, skill,capability, or technology that creates unique valueessential to its competitiveness.
  • Value: the measure of a firms capability to sell the products it offers for more than the costs it incurs
  • Operationally, firms create value either throughcost leadershiporproduct differentiation .
  • Differentiationspurs a firm to offer unique,high-value products that are difficult to match or copy.

11- 12. The Firm as a Value Chain

  • Value chain: the set of linked, value-creating activities a firm performs to design, produce, market, deliver, and support a product, i.e., the format and interactions amongst the various functions of a firm
  • [Value chain analysis explains cost behavior and revealsexisting and potential sources of product differentiation.]
  • Primary activities: the classical managerial functions ofthe firm
  • Support activities: functions that provide inputs which allow the primary activities to occur
  • Profit margins: the differences between total revenues generated and total costs incurred
  • Orientation: upstream (in-bound)vs. downstream (out-bound) activities

11- 13. Fig. 11.4: The Value Chain Framework 11- 14. Value Chain Configuration

  • Value chain configuration may be influenced by:
  • cost factors[wage rates, productivity, inflation, etc.]
  • business environments[political & economic risk]
  • cluster effects[related value creation activities]
  • logistics[value-to-weight ratio, just-in-time practices]
  • degree of digitization[virtual value creation]
  • economies of scale[unit cost reductions]
  • customer needs[buyer-related support activities]
  • Configuration [spatial arrangement] should be optimized in lightof prevailing economic, legal, political, and cultural conditions.

11- 15. Map 11.2: Labor Costs and Location Decisions 11- 16. Value Chain Coordination

  • Value chain coordination may be influenced by:
  • operational obstacles[communication challenges, currencies, and measurement systems]
  • national cultural differences[information sharing, time, etc.]
  • learning effects[cost savings via performance and quality improvements]
  • subsidiary networks[real-time connectivity and functional integration]
  • Coordination [the balanced movement of different partsat the same time] should be optimized in waysthat leverage a firms core competencies.

11- 17.

  • The value chain serves as a system concept that helps mangers:
  • evaluate a firms strengths and weaknesses
  • interpret the determinants of the firms internal cost structure, the basis of its core competencies, and its relationships with customers
  • link the internal features and functions of a competitor to the content of its marketplace strategy
  • The configuration and coordination of a firms value chain should reflect changes in its bases for value creation, including:
  • customers and their needs
  • competitors
  • industries
  • environments

11- 18. Countervailing Forces: Global Integration vs. Local Responsiveness

  • Pressures for global integration
    • Globalization of markets:the convergence of customer preferences for similar products, minimal costs, and maximum value
    • [A commodity serves a universal need across countries and cultures and is traded strictly on the basis of price.]
    • Globalization of production:efficiency gains via stan-dardization, i.e., the maximization of location economies
  • Pressures for local responsiveness
    • Customer divergence: differences in culture, national attitudes, and economic and usage conditions
    • Host government policies: economic freedom, work-place and product regulation, buy-local legislation, etc.

11- 19. The Global Integration/Local Responsiveness Grid

  • The integration/responsiveness grid (IR) profiles the interaction of the pressures for global integration and pressures for local responsiveness.
  • Integration: the process of combining dif-ferentiated parts into a standardized whole
  • Responsiveness: the process of disaggregatinga standardized whole into differentiated parts
  • The IR grid reveals how a firms choice of strategy is a function of the relationship between its idea of value creation and the pressures for integration and/or respon-siveness as it looks to international markets for growth opportunities, cost reductions, and risk diversification.

11- 20. Fig. 11.5: The Integration/ Responsiveness Grid and Industry Types 11- 21. Strategic Alternatives:The International Strategy

  • International strategy: opportunistic expansion into foreign operations that leverages the firms core (domestic) competencies
  • Ultimate control and decision-making reside at headquarters.
  • Value is created by transferring core competencies and unique offerings from headquarters into foreign markets where rivals are unable to develop, match, or sustain them.
  • International activities are generally secondary to the priorities of the domestic market.
  • Headquarters ethnocentric orientation, i.e., its home countryfocus, may lead to significant missed market opportunities.

11- 22. Strategic Alternatives:The Multidomestic Strategy

  • Multidomestic strategy: expansion into foreign opera-tions that grants decision-making authority to local managers and emphasizes responsiveness to local conditions
  • Decision-making is decentralized so that offerings can be adjusted to meet the needs of individual countries or regions.
  • Value is created by giving local managers the authority to respond to unique local cultural, legal, and economic environments.
  • The polycentric view holds that people who are close to the market both physically and culturally can best run a business.
  • The distribution of decision-making authority to local managers maylead to duplication in activities, significantly higher costs, andunusually powerful (autonomous) local subsidiaries.

11- 23. Strategic Alternatives:The Global Strategy

  • Global strategy: expansion into foreign operations that champions worldwide consistency, standard-ization, and cost competitiveness
  • Although activities are dispersed to the most favorable global locations, decision-making remains highly cen-tralized at headquarters.
  • Value is created by designing products for a world market and manufacturing and marketing them as effectively and efficiently as possible.
  • Global firms strive to convert global efficiency into price competitiveness via production and location economies.
  • In markets where demand for local responsiveness remains high, global strategies are largely ineffective, and market opportunities are missed.

11- 24. Strategic Alternatives:The Transnational Strategy

  • Transnational strategy: expansion into foreign opera-tions that exploits location economies, leverages core competencies, and responds to key local conditions
  • The causes of interactive global learning and worldwide information sharing are championed.
  • Value is created by the relentless renewal, enhancement, and exchange of ideas, products, and processes across functions and borders.
  • The transnational MNE differentiates capabilities and contribu-tions while finding ways to systematically learn and ultimately integrate and diffuse knowledge, thus developing more powerful core competencies.
  • Realistically, the transnational firm faces serious challenges to its attempts to efficiently and effectively configure and coordinate its activities.

11- 25. Fig. 11.6: The Integration/ Responsiveness Grid and Strategy Types 11- 26. Implications/Conclusions

  • Industry structure explains the functions, form, and interrelationships amongst suppliers, buyers, products, new entrants, and rivals.
  • Even though competition is not perfect, industry structure does influence a firms performance.
  • Because competition is not perfect, oppor-tunities exist to convert innovative strategies into superior competitiveness.
  • [continued]

11- 27.

  • Great managers devise great strategies that build great companies that outperform their industry rivals.
  • Designing a strategy within the context of the value chain can improve the quality of analyses and decisions by deconstructing value creation opportunities into a series of discrete activities.

11-