dasm2_cdrpresentation_12feb16 (3)
TRANSCRIPT
© 2012 Boise State University 1
DASM2- Critical Design Review
Ammar Alobithani, Cody Breckenridge, Raymond Clark, Derrick Hirsch,
Lauren Johnson, Van Jones, Evan Mayfield, Dustin Miller, and Michael Wolf
© 2012 Boise State University 2
Background, Needs & Specs
Ammar Alobithani
© 2012 Boise State University 3
Project Background— Data Athletics is a company that specializes in developing
equipment to help athletes train at higher levels
— The Speed Machine is designed to help athletes move faster by
pulling them 110% of their unassisted top speed
— The ideal solution will reconfigure the motor controller and
redesign the external frame to allow the athlete to run toward
and past the machine
© 2012 Boise State University 4
Objectives— Enhance teamwork skills by communicating, collaborating, and
excelling as an interdisciplinary group— Establish professional relationships with our professors and
sponsors— Meet the engineering needs of our sponsors — Design, analyze, and test each subsystem of the Speed
Machine to ensure the integration of the final Speed Machine works properly
— Integrate the electrical and mechanical designs into one working machine
© 2012 Boise State University 5
Customer Requirements / “Needs”
— Must be capable of pulling a runner faster than their
natural/unassisted top speed
— Device will be operable via a Bluetooth device and app
— Device will utilize robust frame to house all sub-systems
— Device will be operable by one person
© 2012 Boise State University 6
Engineering Requirements / “Specs”
— Must be capable of pulling runners for a minimum of 10
seconds at 110% of their unassisted top speed
— Must contain quick-release mechanism
— Device will utilize system to evenly wind cable on spool
— Device will have built in safety stop if pulling force exceeds
expected amount
© 2012 Boise State University 7
Mechanical Design, Analysisand Testing Plans
© 2012 Boise State University 8
Motor & Power Transmission
Michael Wolf
© 2012 Boise State University 9
Power Transmission System
© 2012 Boise State University 10
Drive Transmission
V Belt Configuration
25in 2L Rubber Belt
155/205˚ Contact Angle
Pulley Pitch DiametersPd1 = 1.9in Pd2 = 4.9in
Speed Reduction
© 2012 Boise State University 11
Motor
Turnigy G60 Brushless Outrunner Motor
Turnigy G60 Brushless Outrunner Motor• Economical• Slow angular velocities• Compact/lightweight
Specifications: Speed------------------------300 RPM per voltPower------------------------1425W max Weight-----------------------360g (0.8lb)
Speed Calculation:18.5V battery * 300kV = 5550 RPM
© 2012 Boise State University 12
Motor Mounting
Fully Supported Shaft
Sliding Lock Slots
Belt Pre-Tension = 17 lbs
© 2012 Boise State University 13
Speed Reduction
Motor Max Speed = 5500 RPM
With
Max Reel Speed () = 2150 RPM
Rope Linear Velocity
Assumed Average Spool Radius () = 2 in = 0.0508 m
Maximum Rope Linear Velocity () = 11.5 m/s
© 2012 Boise State University 14
Rope Management
Evan Mayfield
© 2012 Boise State University 15
Servo-arm oscillator
Isometric view of servo motor with arm Frontal view of design
© 2012 Boise State University 16
Servo-arm oscillator
Right view of power transmission and rope management module.
Top view
© 2012 Boise State University 17
Servo-arm oscillator
Specifications: Speed------------------------0.13 sec/60 @ 7.4V Torque-----------------------111 oz-in @ 7.4V Weight-----------------------59 g (0.14 lbs)
Savox SW-0230MG Waterproof Servo
© 2012 Boise State University 18
Servo-arm oscillator
Top view of servo in assembly
35°
© 2012 Boise State University 19
Arm
Van Jones
© 2012 Boise State University 20
Rear Arm Attachment and Telescoping Shaft
Rear Arm Attachment Telescoping Shaft
© 2012 Boise State University 21
Arm Attachment with Full Assembly
© 2012 Boise State University 22
Arm Attachment with Full Assembly - Closed
© 2012 Boise State University 23
Arm Attachment with Full Assembly - Closed
© 2012 Boise State University 24
Utilizing Telescoping Shaft
© 2012 Boise State University 25
Utilizing Telescoping Shaft
© 2012 Boise State University 26
Utilizing Telescoping Shaft
© 2012 Boise State University 27
Utilizing Telescoping Shaft
© 2012 Boise State University 28
Utilizing Telescoping Shaft
View of runner running towards SM
© 2012 Boise State University 29
Pulley System
Side View
© 2012 Boise State University 30
Pulley System
Top View
© 2012 Boise State University 31
Pulley System
Bottom of Arm Top of Arm
© 2012 Boise State University 32
Arm Design Analysis• Points of Interest
– Base of Arm
– Hinges
– Arm Base Lockpin
© 2012 Boise State University 33
Stress Calculation in Arm
Arm cross-section (inches)
𝐼𝑍=𝐼 𝑦=2.94 𝑖𝑛4
Max dimensions of arm (inches)
© 2012 Boise State University 34
y
z
F
Tz
Ty
𝑀𝑧=𝑀𝑦=0𝑇𝑧=𝐹∗𝐿𝑦≈24 𝑙𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑇𝑦=𝐹∗𝐿𝑧 ≈500 𝑙𝑏𝑖𝑛
σ 𝑧=𝑇𝑦 ∗𝑟𝐼𝑧 =𝟏𝟐𝐩𝐬𝐢
σ 𝑦=𝑇𝑧∗𝑟𝐼𝑦 =𝟐𝟓𝟓𝐩𝐬𝐢
© 2012 Boise State University 35
Testing Plans for Arm• Test arm strength with maximum expected
tension
• Test arm stability with runner attached
• Test rope for smooth feeding through pulley system
© 2012 Boise State University 36
Electrical Design, Analysis and Testing PlansCody Breckenridge
© 2012 Boise State University 37
Speed Machine System Diagram
© 2012 Boise State University 38
Prototype Shield Stack DesignArduino Mega 2560
• Based on the ATmega2560 AVR microcontroller
• 70 digital I/O pins• 15 of which can be used as PWM• 16 can be used for analog• Several options for communication
protocols• Has an extensive support network for
embedded projects• This development board will control
all aspects of signal processing and calculations
© 2012 Boise State University 39
Prototype Shield Stack DesignArduino MicroSD Shield
• Easily interfaced with Arduino board• Increased memory for overall design
© 2012 Boise State University 40
Prototype Shield Stack DesignLoad Cell Shield (Price: $19.95)
• Based on AD8426 Amplifier• Adjustable areas
• Potentiometer adjustable Voltage Reference
• 0 to 60 dB of gain• Second Order Bessel Low Pass Filter
• Frequency cutoff adjusted by changing resistors and capacitors
© 2012 Boise State University 41
Prototype Shield Stack DesignArduino Prototype Shield (Price: $4 - $10)
• 1.0 Arduino pinout• 1 Reset button• 1 ICSP connector• 14 pin SMD footprint (50 mils pitch)• 20 pin Through Hole footprint (100 mils pitch)
1.4 cm X 2.2 cm1.6 cm X 4 cm
© 2012 Boise State University 42
Prototype Shield Stack DesignBenefits of using the shield:
• Avoid inherent set backs of creating a custom PCB• Improved electrical prototype layout• Less wiring • Cheap product (rang of $4 to $20)
© 2012 Boise State University 43
Load Cell DesignLoad Cell : FC2211-0000-0025-L (Price: $60. 96)
• Type: Compression• Accuracy : 1%• Operating force: 25lbs• Excitation Voltage: 5V• Height: 19.4mm• Width: 34mm
© 2012 Boise State University 44
Load Cell DesignFX1900-0000-0025-L (Price: $30.76)
• Operating Force: 25lbs• ExcitationVoltage: 5V
© 2012 Boise State University 45
Load Cell DesignLoad Cell Shield, Instrument Amplifier (AD8426)
• Bandwidth (G = 1): 1 MHz • CMRR (G = 1): 80 dB • minimum Input noise: 24 nV/√Hz• Gain range: (1 - 1000 V/V)/(0 – 60 dB)• 2 channels in a small, 4 mm × 4 mm LFCSP• 2.2 V to 36 V for single supply• operates on supplies ranging from ±1.35 V to
±18 V for dual supplies
© 2012 Boise State University 46
Load Cell DesignLoad Cell Calculations
Rated output (Rout) = 20mV/VExcitation voltage (Ev) = 5VMax output (Vmax_out) = Rout*Ev = 100mVAmplified output = G*Vmax_outAD8426 transfer function: Vout = G*(Vout+ - Vout-) + VrefUsing 0-5 V and Vref = 2.5V 5V = G*(100mV) + 2.5VTherefore: G = 25V/V = 27.96dB
Results: 10mV – 100mV load cell output voltage is amplified to 2.75V-5V for ADC processingLoad cell will require calibration to determine zero force voltage and max force voltage for programming purposes
10 bit ADC 1024 possible valuesAmplified Load cell resolution 5V/1024 = 4.88mV
Therefore: a 0.0244 change in pounds will result in a 4.88mV change in amplified voltage if hysteresis non-linearity is neglected
© 2012 Boise State University 47
Load Cell Design
© 2012 Boise State University 48
Motor Controller Design
© 2012 Boise State University 49
Motor Controller DesignComparisons TURNIGY TRUST 70A MambaMaxPro
Max motor current of 60A X X
Output voltage of 18.5V X X
Can use with brushless and brushed motors
X X
Need to program it through SD card or a kit
X X
Can program it in Ardiuno X X
Requires purchase of programming card
X X
Needs to be purchased X
Price + programming card $32 + $3 $127 + $22
© 2012 Boise State University 50
Motor Controller Design
© 2012 Boise State University 51
MotorsME suggestion (cost around $54):
Turnigy G60 Brushless Outrunner 300kv (.60 Glow) specification:• Battery: 5~7 Cell /18.5~25.9V• RPM: 300kv• Max current: 60A • No load current: 11V/1.2A• Current capacity: 60A/15sec• Internal resistance: 0.04 ohm• Weight: 360g (not including connectors)• Diameter of shaft: 6mm• Dimensions: 81x50mm
© 2012 Boise State University 52
Software Design (Android)
© 2012 Boise State University 53
Software Design (Arduino)• Use extensive Arduino libraries to assist with
programming• Fix memory allocation issues (done)• Redesign of code is possible if performance issues are
encountered• Test software on actual devices • Modify code when necessary• Use software as part of testing for the devices it controls
© 2012 Boise State University 54
Testing Plan— Over-Speed and Single User— Power Supply Compatibility — Force Control/Noise — Run Completion/ Run Failure — Storing and Tracking Data — Weather Resistance
— Wireless Digital Interface— Passing Electrical Code— Device Measurements — Battery Endurance — Budget and Manufacturing — Facility Surface — Distance Measurement
© 2012 Boise State University 55
Budget, Schedule & Project Risk Assessment
Ray Clark
© 2012 Boise State University 56
BudgetAssembly/Category Estimated Costs Description/Comments
Arm System $150.00• Estimation based off of all new components• Components from previous Speed Machine will
be used if adequate.
EE Design $205.41• Total price for the load cell, load cell shield, and
Arduino proto shield.• Price also includes shipping and handling
Frame $xx.xx • Already built before the project was started.
Motor $92.73• Motor and connected components have been
selected.• Price includes shipping and handling.
Power Transmission $158.05 • All parts for this assembly have been selected.• Price includes shipping and handling.
© 2012 Boise State University 57
Assembly/Category Estimated Costs Description/Comments
Rope Management $170.00• Estimation based off of all new components• Components from previous Speed Machine will
be used if adequate.
Misc. $100.00 • Price includes unforeseen needs or if components are damaged.
Total $926.19
© 2012 Boise State University 58
Schedule
© 2012 Boise State University 59
Project Risk AssessmentPossible Problems Estimated Likelihood Contingency Plan
Integrating each subsystems into one system that will fit
inside the current casingModerate
Team chief will check off the dimensions as they are designed, and the team members responsible for the subsystem can create cardboard prototypes to place
in the casing to mark off the required space for his/her subsystem
Mounting the subsystems to one block Low Create 3D model in SolidWorks to visualize the best
way to mount each subsystem to one block
Manufacturing will take our team members more time than expected to complete
Moderate Outsource some parts to a machine shop that can get a project done more quickly
Material lead time issues Low Source material from multiple locations, and keep track of shipping
© 2012 Boise State University 60
Possible Problems Estimated Likelihood Contingency Plan
Meeting the deadlines of major milestones Low
Utilize liquid planner, weekly project updates to professors, and complete individual responsibilities
on time
Problems with running software Low/Moderate Seek advice of faculty/students/online resources
Noise contamination of signal integrity cannot be reconciled Moderate Consider a second 9V supply to power sub-circuitry
Burn-out/Destroy Electrical Low/Moderate Check the Re-usium in Boise for electrical components for quick replacement
Meeting the time line for a working prototype Moderate Seek advice of faculty and re-evaluate the schedule
© 2012 Boise State University 61
THANK YOU
Ammar Alobithani, Cody Breckenridge, Raymond Clark,Derrick Hirsch, Lauren Johnson, Van Jones, Evan Mayfield, Dustin Miller, and Michael Wolf