[Product Name] Marketing Plan

1Data AnalysisRetreat: May 16-18, 2012School of EducationCampbellsville University

2NCATE Standard 2a

2a. The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on applicant qualifications,candidate performance, graduate performance andunit operations Purposeto evaluate and improve the performance of candidates, the unit and its programs.3NCATE Standard 2b:2b. Candidate assessment data are regularly and systematically collected, compiled, aggregated, summarized and analyzed to

Improve candidate performanceImprove program qualityImprove unit operations4NCATE Standard 2c2c.The unit regularly and systematically uses data, including candidate and graduate performance information to evaluate the efficacy of its

CoursesProgramsClinical experiences5NCATE Standard 22c. The unit analyzes program evaluation and performance data to initiate changes in ProgramsUnit operations6NCATE Standard 1Title II reports for three yearsKey assessments/scoring guides for standardsData and summaries on key assessmentsData and summaries on dispositionsSummaries of follow-up studies of graduatesSummaries of employer feedback on graduates

7NCATE Standard 3: Field/Clinical3.3.f Assessment instruments and scoring guides used for and data collected from field experiences and clinical practice for all programs, including use of technology for teaching and learning (These assessments may be included in program review documents or the exhibits for Standard 1).

3.3.g Performance data on candidates entering and exiting from clinical practice for all programs (These assessments may be included in program review documents or the exhibits for Standard 1. 8NCATE Standard 4: Diversity4.3.a Proficiencies related to diversity that candidates are expected to demonstrate through working with students from diverse groups in classrooms and schools4.3.c Assessment instruments, scoring guides, and data related to candidates meeting diversity proficiencies, including impact on student learning (These assessments may be included in program review documents or the exhibits for Standard 1. Cross reference as appropriate.)4.3.d Data table on faculty demographics 4.3.e Data table on candidates demographics 9NCATE Standards 5 & 65.3f Policies, procedures, and practices for faculty evaluation (including promotion and tenure) and summaries of the results in areas of teaching, scholarship and service

6.3.i Candidates access to physical and/or virtual classrooms, computer labs, curriculum resources, and library resources that support teaching and learning6.3.j Candidates access to distance learning including support services and resources, if applicable

10OverviewData for 2011: Spring & FallCompared to 2009-2010Undergraduate ProgramsCAPs 1, 2, 3, 4 Praxis II Diversity Proficiencies: KTS/IECEExit EvaluationsNew Teacher Survey* Not Conducted in 2011Graduate Programs: MAE/SED/Rank ICAPs 5, 6 and 7Empowerment IndexFollow-Up Surveys of GraduatesCourse Evaluations11CAPs 1& 2: 2011CAP 1: Intent to Enter TECAP 2: Admission to TESpring, Fall: 2011

Spring, Fall, 2011

CAP 1: 174 applicants58 spring; 116 fallCAP 2: 87 Admitted2011 spring: 35 admitted2011 fall: 32 admitted IECE: 40 C-13; E-4; L-13; 2-10P-5: 185-9: 8 M-1; E-3; M-4; SS-18-12: 15 B-2; E-3; M-5; SS-5P-12: 5 A-1; H-2; M-1; PE-1122011 CAP 2 Admission GPAs2011 Overall 3.352010 Overall 3.39 2009 Overall 3.43IECE 3.36 (40)P-5 3.44 (18)5-9 3.30 (8: English-3, Math-4; SocSt-1)5-12 3.60 (1 Math)8-12 3.24 (15: Bio-2; Eng-3, Math-5, SocSt-5)P-12 3.37 (5: Art-1, Hlth-2, Music-1, PE-1)

13 CAP 2: Admission Competency Exams: 2011 ACTPPST: RPPST: MPPST: WPPSTCombined2009 21.00177.45174.45173.67525.572010 24.25178.75170.00175.63524.632011 Overall 23.04IECE 23.08P-5 22.785-9 22.388-12 23.71P-12 27.00177.54

*5-9 Math, English and social studies did not take; PPST.

175.79

*8-12 biology, 2 English, Math and Social Studies did not take; 1 Eng. did.

174.46

*P-12 Art and PE did not take PPST.Overall 528IECE 528.29P-5 5195-9 --8-12 544P-12 --- Analysis< 2010> 2009Note: Our data summaries do not list the number who took each form of admission exam when both are listed for a major.14CAP 2: Admission Dispositions 2011Highest (4b) Honest/Ethical 4.49 (4.36-2010, 4.50-2009)(2a) Respects others 4.35 (4.25-2010, 4.37-2009)

Lowest (3b) Differentiation 3.44(3a) Sensitivity to Diversity 3.89

*4/6 evaluators rated 4b highest. 5/6 evaluators rated 3b lowest.

CAP 2: Admission Dispositions 2011IECEHighest: 4b Demonstrates ethical behavior 4.674a Conducts self with integrity 4.66Lowest:3b Demonstrates differentiation 3.88

1516CAP 2: Admission Interviews 2011Term1 Oral Presentation2 GPA3 Dispositions4 Experience5 OralCommunication6 Impact on StudentLearning7 (New, f11)Writing Proficiency20094.153.524.404.044.204.1820103.803.194.183.793.793.8820113.913.404.103.674.153.603.95Analysis20102009>2010 previous year 2010: 26NA F, 20105-98E-3; M-4; SS-1previous year2010: 32009: 6NA F, 20108-12 14Bio-2; Eng-3; Math-5; SS-4>previous year2010-52009-13NA F, 2010

P-128Art-1;Music-4Health/PE-32010- 7 all previousFathers EducationHigh school: 100%Mothers Education:College: 100%20CAP 3: 2011Admission to Student TeachingTotal: 62 (2011); 69 (2010); (2009-47)

GPA Means: Overall GPA: 3.44; 2010-3.44; 2009-3.39 Major GPA: 3.46; 2010-3.44; 2009-3.42Prof. GPA: 3.75; 2010-3.73; 2009-3.77

21CAP 3 Disposition Means, 2011 High: 4b Fairness/ethical behavior 4.78

Low: 3b Differentiation 4.13 22CAP 3: Field/PPD Hours 2011Total: Field hours-174; PPD-34

Type:Assisting 98%, consistently highInstructing 95%, consistently highObserving 100%, consistently highResearch 67%, >f08Tutoring * 67%, < previous CAP 3 Portfolios Fall, Spring 2011232425CAP 3 Portfolios, Fall 2011 LiveText2627CAP 3: Portfolio Means, F-2011Portfolio Overall Score spring, 2011-?; fall, 2011-2.58; 2010-2.40 Highest: f11KTS 3 Climate 2.83; 2010-2.76KTS 1 Content 2.71; 2010-2.44Lowest: f11KTS 9 Prof. Growth 2.35; 2010-2.46 KTS 7 Reflection 2.38 (was a highest in 2010)Changes over timeKTS 10 Leadership improved from 2.46 to 2.55

28CAP 3 Portfolios 2011 2009HighestKTS 3 2.95LowestKTS 5 2.52010HighestKTS 3 2.76LowestKTS 1 2.44KTS 9 2.48

2011Highest KTS 3 2.83LowestKTS 9 2.25KTS 7 2.38 CAP 3 Portfolios, 2011Lowest IndicatorsKTS 5e Communicate results 2.00KTS 9b Professional growth 2.09KTS 6c Student use of tech 2.14KTS 7c Reflect on professional gr... 2.24

2930CAP 3 Portfolio: Lowest KTS F, 2010by Lowest IndicatorsKTS 1 Content1e 2.33 Misconceptions1d 2.47 Perspectives

KTS 9 Prof. Growth9d 2.47 Evidence of gr.9c 2.60 Designs planKTS 10 Leadership10c 2.27 Implements10 d 2.33 Analyzes data

CAP 3 Portfolios, Spring 11, IECE31CAP 3 Portfolios, Fall 2011 IECE32CAP 3 Portfolios, IECE 20113334

35IECE: Lowest Mean Indicators f,11All locations7: Professional dev. 2.626: Collaboration 2.73Campbellsville5 Refl, 6 Coll, 9 Tech 2.74 (7d-2.29; 5d/6e-2.43)Somerset7: Professional Dev. 1.14 (1s on 7a,c,e,f)8: Families 1.83 (1s on 8d, e)P-5 CAP 3 Portfolios 2011Lowest KTS 9, Prof. Dev.365-9 CAP 3 Portfolios 2011Lowest: KTS 7 and 10378-12 CAP 3 PortfoliosLowest: KTS 8, 938P-12 CAP 3 Portfolios 2011Lowest: KTS 7, 9, 1039CAP 3 Portfolio: Art, 201140CAP 3 Portfolios: Health/PEKTS 7a,b,c--1.541CAP 3 Portfolios: Music fall,11Lowest: KTS 8 (b,c,d); 9 (d); 5 (e)42CAP 3 Diversity Proficiencies2010KTS 1b: 2.47 Connects content to life experiences of students.KTS 1d: 2.53 Guides students to understand content from different perspectives.KTS 2b: 2.42 Uses contextual data to design instruction relevant to students.KTS 3c: 2.79 Values & supports student diversity and addresses individual needs.KTS 4b: 2.47 Implements instruction based on diverse student needs and assessment data.KTS 6c: 2.26 Integrates student use of technology to meet diverse student needs.Spring, Fall 2011KTS 1b: 2.58 2.68

KTS 1d: 2.50 2.73

KTS 2b: 2.25 2.64

KTS 3c: 2.42 2.77

KTS 4b: 2.00 2.47

KTS 6c: 2.33 2.41 43CAP 3: IECE Diversity Proficiencies2010IECE 1c: 2.71 Individualize curr., plans & assessment for ALL studentsIECE 1f: 2.79 Include knowledge and strategies of multiple disciplinesIECE 1g: 2.93 Plan experiences/instructionfamily strengthsIECE 2f: 2.85 Create/maintain culturally responsive environmentsIECE 3b: 2.77 Implement instructional strategies that meet ind. needsIECE 3e: 2.69 Implement culturally responsive learning experiencesIECE 3f: 2.71 Implement/support family-centered activitiesIECE 4c: 2.77 Plan/impl. assess. strat. sensitive to families culturesIECE 4d: 2.69 Plan/impl. assess. strat. to involve childrens familiesIECE 6b: 2.93 Demon. effective methods of commun.value familiesIECE 6c: 3.00 Collaborate with familiesIECE 6f: 2.79 Articulate ind. outcomes and unique needs of each child..IECE 8b: 3.00 Indiv. interactions/act. sensitive to char. of familiesIECE 8e: 3.00 Respect/provide on-going support for families level of inv.IECE 9d: 2.85 Use technology to meet special needs of children2011Spring 11 Fall 11 Year 1c 2.76 3.00 2.88 1g 2.89 2.92 2.91 2f 2.89 2.75 2.82 3e 2.84 2.64 2.74 6f 2.93 2.58 2.76 8b 2.90 2.92 2.91 9d 2.74 2.58 2.66 Overall 2.85 2.77 2.81 4445CAP 4: 2011Number approved57 for 2011; 58 for 2010; 63 for 09< 10, 09;

Cumulative GPA 3.48 for 2011; 3.40 for 2010; 3.55 for 09> 2010; < than 2009

Major GPA 3.44 for 2011; 3.49 for 2010; 3.61 for 09< 2010 & 2009

Professional GPA 3.71for 2011; 3.72 for 2010; 3.75 for 09< previous two years

46CAP 4 Disposition Means 201120112010Overall4.634.73; 4.63 4.66; 4.50CT1, CT2, Self, Univ. Sup.4.624.47, 4.86, 4.77, 4.34CT1, CT2, Self, UnivSu1. Caring1a 4.67 4.57 4.62 4.231b 4.83 4.67 4.66 4.244.64, 4.85, 4.92, 4.351a Accommodates students needs2. Respects2a 4.85 4.65 4.76 4.63 2b 4.94 4.72 4.69 4.484.64, 4.94, 4.92, 4.353. Values ind. Diff.*3a 4.73 4.52 4.44 4.233b 4.42 4.24 4.10 3.763c 4.83 4.83 4.76 4.144.44, 4.88, 4.62, 4.303a Sensitivity to diversity3b Differentiation4. Honest & ethical4a 4.85 4.70 4.85 4.724b 4.89 4.88 4.82 4.604.64, 4.88, 4.85, 4.435. Responsible*5a 4.59 4.70 4.65 4.595b 4.83 4.67 4.72 4.455c 4.89 4.76 4.38 4.375d 4.89 4.78 4.66 4.474.48, 4.71, 4.65, 4.54CAP 4 Portfolios, Overall 47CAP 4 Portfolios 2011,fallLiveText Lowest: KTS 94849CAP 4 Portfolio Means, 2011,2010, 09Holistic:2.78/2.89/2.81AnalysisKTS 12.84/2.84/2.932nd highestKTS 22.71/2.84/2.80KTS 3+2.76/2.92/2.95KTS 4+2.86/2.76/2.82HighestKTS 5-2.74/2.81/2.80KTS 6+2.75/2.74/2.82KTS 7-2.64/2.81/2.75LowestKTS 8-2.76/2.78/2.79KTS 9-2.65/2.84/2.932nd lowestKTS 10-2.75/2.82/2.88CAP 4 Portfolios, 2011

5051CAP 4: Portfolios by Major 2011Portfolio Scores: KTS Holistic HighestLowestP-5 3.00 H, 2, 3, 5, 7, 109 (2.60)5-9 3.00 H, 1-7, 9 8, 10 (2.00) 8-122.67 3 (3.00)1 (2.60)P-12 2.006-8, 10 (3.00)Others: 2.00 52Diversity Proficiencies: KTS 2011KTSCAP 4 Portfolio*Coop.TeacherUniv. SupervisorVideo EvaluationIndicator1b2.50/2.712.822.732.57Connects content to life experiences1d2.53/2.502.862.732.64Guides students to understand content from various perspectives.2b2.63/2.792.822.822.59Uses contextual data to design instruction relevant to students.3c2.75/2.362.832.772.73Values & supports student diversity & addresses individual needs4b2.47/2.432.692.612.43Implements instruction based on diverse student needs and .5c2.52/2.432.722.692.53Regularly integrates technology meet diverse student needs.53CAP 4 Portfolio Growth Areas2011KTS 7 Reflection KTS 9 Professional Growth

2010 KTS 4 Implements Instruction Indicators4a: variety of strategies 2.714b: instruction based on diverse... 2.434c: uses time wisely 2.774d: uses space & materials wisely 2.924e: facilitate higher-order thinking 2.43CAP 4 Portfolios: Cville IECE 201154Elizabethtown: IECE CAP 4 201155Louisville IECE CAP 4 Portfolios56Somerset: IECE CAP 4 Portfolios5758CAP 4 Growth Areas, IECE, 2011CU: 5: Reflect 2.38 Elizabethtown:8: Families 2.90

Louisville: 9: Technology 2.67

Somerset: NA59CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2011*Assisting: 93%; 100% -2010Instructing: 91%; 100%-2010Observing: 92%; 100%-2010Research: 58%; 58%-2010Tutoring: 72%; 60%-2010 SB Meet.: 12%Families: 26%Commun. 26%60CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2011Diversity 2011 2010Ethnicity89% 93%Exceptionality86% 83%Language61.4% 61%Race84% 83% Religion: 49% 58% Socioeconomic: 86% 89% Gender:89% 93% Diversity: IECERace: 94%; Exceptionality: 73%; Gender: 83%; Language: 79%; Religion: 61%; Socioeconomic: 77%

61CAP 4: Interview Ratings 2011-10*IndicatorRating 2011 2010Trends Poised4.61 4.68< Last 2 yearsArticulate4.48 4.49< Last 2 years Content Knowledge4.47 4.43> 2010Pedagogy4.26 4.25> 2010Reflection4.47 4.38> 2010Q1: Meet KTS4.55 4.41>2010Q2: Student Learning4.37 4.34> 201062CAP 4: Univ. Supv./Coop. Tchr, Form A/B 1-3 2011*KTSCooperating TeachersMid Final GainUniversity Supervisers1 2 3 4 GainKTS 1 Content2.88 2.98 +.102.59 2.85 2.88 2.97 +.38KTS 2 Design2.76 2.97 +.212.47 2.76 2.85 2.91 +.44KTS 3 Climate2.89 2.97 +.082.79 2.89 2.94 2.94 +.15KTS 4 Implement2.70 2.93 +.232.37 2.79 2.72 2.97 +.60KTS 5 Assess2.60 2.95 +.352.37 2.75 2.75 2.91 +.54 KTS 6 Technology2.89 3.00 +.112.80 2.94 2.91 2.97 +.17KTS 7 Reflection2.72 2.89 +.172.28 2.58 2.97 2.90 +.62KTS 8 Collab.2.70 2.87 +.171.76 2.45 2.75 3.00 +.24KTS 9 Prof Gr2.67 2.89 +.222.00 2.27 2.59 2.96 +.96KTS 10 Leadership2.75 2.88 +.132.00 2.57 2.76 2.92 +.92 63CAP 4: Video Evaluations-Prof./Self*KTS 2011Professor

2011/2010/2009Self-Evaluation2010/2009/2008AnalysisKTS 1 Content2.97/2.90/2.732.79/2.87/2.89KTS 2 Design2.91/2.81/2.842.65/2.89/2.83Lowest-Professor for fall, 2010KTS 3 Climate2.94/2.94/2.882.86/2.92/3.00Highest-ProfessorHighest-SelfKTS 4 Implement2.62/2.94/2.842.62/2.69/2.72Highest-Professor2nd lowest fall 2010-selfKTS 5 Assess2.58/2.74/2.832.58/2.81/2.54Lowest overall & fall, 2010-selfLowest overall-ProfessorKTS 6Technology2.77/2.80/2.922.77/2.88/2.932nd lowest overall-professor64CAP 4: IECE Video Evaluations-Prof./Self*IECE 2011 ProfessorSelf-EvaluationAnalysisIECE 1 Design3.003.00Highest-bothIECE 2 Environment2.803.00IECE 3 Implement2.803.00IECE 4Assess2.803.00IECE 9Technology2.003.00Lowest-Professor65CAP 4: Praxis Data2010-11 Cohort*Traditional2010-11 73/78 94% pass rate2009-10 48/52 92% pass rate2008-09 67/69 97% pass rate

Alternative2010-11 28/28 100% pass rate2009-10 36/36 100% pass rate66CAP 4: Praxis Data2010-11 CohortLevelPassingMeanIECE (34)NA (166-1/11)173P-5 (10148179 (E-6)5-9English 158165Math148155Science144NASocial St.149149English/Science158/144169/150SocSt/Eng149/158NA/178Math/SocSt148/149167/173Science/SocSt144/149182/167

67CAP 4: Praxis Data2010-11 Cohort* PassingMeanEnglish-2160/155174/163/188 (E-2)Math-4125/141149/178/178 (E-2)SocSt.-1151/159156/176/173Art-2154/158171/174/181 (E-1)Music-4145/154162/163/169PE/Hlth-3147/151155/166SED-10 171/179

68CAP 4 Exit Evaluation 201112 items: KTS + professional ed & major

Spring 2011Highest KTS 2,3,5,8,10 (4.0); 1,4, 7,9 (3.0)

Positives: KTIP Availability of Education faculty Overall program; field hours; student teaching; lessons69CAP 4 Exit Evaluation, Fall 2011Highest KTS: 1,2,3,6,7,9,10 (4.0)Lowest KTS: 4,5,8 (3.0)PositivesEducation professorsKTIPSuggestionsVideos on LiveTextFirst seminar earlierToo much change during my termsHow to involve students with technology70Program Completers 2010-11*Students who complete the program curriculum-traditional and alternative.May or may not have passed Praxis II.

Three databases:EPSB (Sept. 15--Education Professional Standards Board)ETS (Dec. 2--Educational Testing Service)Westat federal database (April 30--Title II Report Card)71ETS Title II Reports 2010-2011*Traditional ProgramProgram completers: 782011; 522010 Institutional pass rate: 94% (90% in10;97% in 09; 94% in 08)Cohorts with 10 or more:IECEP-5SEDPLTAlternative Program Program completers: 282011; 362010 Institutional pass rate: 100% (100% in 2010)

72Title II/Westat Update*Westat: Federal DatabaseEnrollment/admission/completion/certified/Praxis II-assessment rates/summary pass ratesTraditional/Alternative for three yearsAnnual GoalsShortage areas of math, science, special education, ELL instruction7 AssurancesTraining responds to needs of local educational agenciesTraining linked to needs of schoolsCore academic subjectsTraining for children with disabilities, Limited English proficiency Low income families, Urban/rural schools

73New Teacher Survey 2010-11*--Was not administered in 10-11--2009 EditionBased on KTS indicators (46)Student teachers and cooperating teachersInterns and resource teachersCooperating teachers scored KTS 4 lowest (all five indicators)Resource teachers scored KTS 5 lowest (Self assessment lowest)Student Teachers scored KTS 5 and 10 low (all indicators)Lowest: 1.4 Guides students to understand content from various perspectives (-.13)Lowest: 1.5 Identify and address students misconceptions about content (-.12)

74MAE: CAP 5 Admission 2011*Number Admitted: 11 (7 in 10, 7 in 09) GPA: 3.54TL-Masters in Education 2011*CAP 5: Dispositions Mean: 4.641a-4.40; 1b-4.10 (Commitment to professional growth)2a-4.45; 2b-4.60 (Effective communication skills)3a-4.73; 3b-4.90; 3c-4.90 (Integrity)4a-4.60; 4b-4.45; 4c-4.45 (Leadership)5a-4.64; 5b-4.64; 5c-4.27 (Responsible)6a-4.70; 6b-4.70; 6c-4.70 (Collaboration)7a-4.64; 7b-4.64; 7c-4.64 (Caring attitude)1b=Identifies and prioritizes growth areasCAP 7: Dispositions?

7576MAE: CAP 6 & 7, 2011*CAP 6 ContinuationNumber approved: NANumber of hours completed: NAGPA: NA

CAP 7 Exit Number approved: 6 GPA: 3.75Masters Action Research Project:2011: 229.14 95.402010: 235.56

Masters Action Research Project*77Masters Action Research Project*20112011Highest KTS 74.82 Lowest KTS 83.95

2010Highest KTS 74.96Lowest KTS 24.58Missing data: KTS 8??7879Rank I Data: 2011*CAP 5: 16 totalLocation: 14 CU; 2 LvilleDOSE certification: 9 CU;1 LvilleGifted endorsement: 4 CU; 1 LvilleProfessional specialty: 1 CU; 0 LvilleSED 9; GPA: 3.83CAP 6:Number approved: ? GPA: ?CAP 7:Number approved: 20; GPA 3.7180Rank 1 Diversity Data 2011*Age: 59% 26-35; 26% 36-45 Lville 55% 26-35; 32% 36-45Gender: 7 female; 3 maleRace: 10 white; 81Rank 1 Program Data 2011*Culminating Project1.2 3.001.3 3.002.2 3.005.4 3.007.1 3.008.2 2.679.2 3.0010.1 2.67

82SED TRACs 3 & 4 Data 2011*CAP 5Admitted 44 TRAC 3; 14-TRAC 4)

Undergraduate GPAT3: 3.15; T4: 2.65GREVerbal: Trac 3-309; Trac 4-368Quantitative: Trac 3: 311; Trac 4: 396 83TRACs 3 & 4: Dispositions 2011CAP 5 TRAC 3: Range 4.00-4.11Low: 3, 4, 5: 4.00; High 1 & 2: 4.11TRAC 4:Range 3.80 -4.00Low: 1: 3.80; High 2, 3, 4, 5 4.00

CAP 7 TRAC 3: NATRAC 4: All 5s84SED TRACs 3 & 4: Interviews 2011Admission Interviews:12 criteria, using a scale of 1-5TRAC 3Highest: 8 Stability 4.50Lowest: 2 Education 3.87TRAC 4Highest: 4 Punctual & 9 Ethical Conduct 5.00Lowest: 2 (3.33) education85SED TRACS 3 & 4: Oral Presentation, CAP 5Added to interviews for fall, 2010Consists of 14 criteria2011 ResultsHighest: 9-3.89 Accuracy of ContentLowest: 6-3.64 Organization

86SED CAP 6 Tracs 3 & 4--2011Approved37 37 for 201067 for 2009 (24/43)GPA3.032.85 for 20102.82 for 2009DiversityAge: 36-45 44%26-35 31%Gender:65% female Race: 73% white 26% Black87SED: TRACs 3 & 4, CAP 7 2011Approved46GPA3.87Field Hrs.29Praxis II0353 171.180542 180.41Portfolio Scores2.7888SED: TRACs 3 & 4, CAP 7 Portfolios 2011*KTS 12.63/2.91Content: decreased*KTS 22.61/2.85Design: decreasedKTS 32.94/2.92Climate: improvedKTS 42.55/2.84Implement: decreasedKTS 52.65/2.63Assessment: decreasedKTS 62.65/2.73Technology: decreasedKTS 72.47/2.76Reflection: decreased *KTS 82.64/2.86Collaborate: decreasedKTS 9 2.72/2.88Professional Growth: decreasedKTS 102.78/2.86

Leadership: decreased

89SED TRACs 5 & 6, CAP 5 20011Approved7273 201050 2009GPA3.323.583.29 3.76 20103.32 3.89 2009Age49%: 16-2528%: 26-35Fewer from 36-45 yearsGender73 % female27% maleNumber of males decreasing from 2009Ethnicity98%-White0%-Hispanic2%-Black>Whites decreased from 96% to 94%Religion: 21%-Christian; 30% Catholic; 23% Baptist; 7% Methodist90SED: TRACs 5 & 6 Data 2011CAP 6: approved3824 in 2010 GPA 3.85Similar to previous yrs. Field Hours32 2010 0542185Comparable91SOE Faculty Evaluations: Fall, 2011*All scores 4.03 and above; 4.16--2010HighestQ14: 4.27 Instructor is interested in progress of students.Q18: 4.20 Instructor routinely holds class full period.Q22: 4.19 Instructor encouraged student participation.

Lowest (lowest last year 4.17)Q 8: 4.03 Instructor makes course content enjoyable and interestingQ 1: 4.06 Course is well organized.Q21: 4.07 Instructor communicates effectively to students his knowledge

Lower than campus wide: all questionsQ1: 4.06--4/29 The course is organized.Q27: 4.17--4.39 Instructor was knowledgeable in the subject areaQ25: 4.16-4.29 Instructor treated students with respect and courtesyQ9: 4.20/4.23 Tests & exams are based on assigned materialsOverall: education 4.14/4.23; CU 4.28/4.21Empowerment IndexAssessment system aligned with conceptual frameworkConceptual framework integrated throughout all assessment points.Overall empowerment index is an average of the Content index: KTS 1, 5, 6Process index: KTS 2, 3, 4Self-Efficacy index: KTS 7, 8, 9, 10Based on CAP 4 portfolios and CT, US observation evaluations92 NEW: Empowerment Indices EMPOWERMENT INDICES 2009-20112011CONTENTPROCESSSELF EFFICACYEMPOWERMENT INDEXCAP 4 Portfolios2.802.842.772.80CAP 4 Observations2.832.832.682.782011 EMP INDEX2.822.842.732.792010CONTENTPROCESSSELF EFFICACYEMPOWERMENT INDEXCAP 4 Portfolios2.812.852.822.83CAP 4 Observations2.802.822.752.792010 EMP INDEX2.812.842.792.812009CONTENTPROCESSSELF EFFICACYEMPOWERMENT INDEXCAP 4 Portfolios2.812.872.822.83CAP 4 Observations2.772.812.702.762009 EMP INDEX2.792.842.762.8093Inter-rater Reliability Study 2012Inconsistent evaluation of:Main page .063 Standard Deviation (SD)Table of Cont: 1.1

KTS 2 c, d .5 .63 Assessments/Instructional Str.KTS 5 c, d .65 .51 Summative/Analyzes dataKTS 6 e .58 Ethical use of technologyKTS 9 c, d .51 .52 Design/evid. of prof. growthKTS 10 a, c, d .54 .55 .58 Identify, implement, analyze

94Graduate Follow-Up Studies 2011-12Policy: 1 and 3 years out; employersFollow-up Survey: scale of 1-52010 Traditional, initial:Highest KTS 5 (4.13); KTS 1 and 3 (3.93)Lowest KTS 10 (3.47) and 8 (3.53) Diversity--3.07; Disabilities3.27; Families--3.2Field Experiences3.8Student Teaching4.33 (highest overall)Total preparation: 3.67

95Graduate Follow Up Studies*1011 Traditional/Initial CommentsStrengthsKTIPDesigning/planningProfessorsSuggestionsObservations: make sure they are doing themMore realistic experiences, like student teachingOpportunities to work with ELLs0910 Traditional/Initial CommentsStrengthsKTIP; small class; planning; reflectionSuggestions: field experiencesmore structure

9697Additional Data Needed-2010Faculty EvaluationsEvidence of using data for program improvementFollow-up Surveys: plan for regular Follow-up Surveys of recent grads from all programs KTS data for graduate programsSACS: employment status of graduates

2a The unit conducts thorough studies to establish fairness, accuracy and consistence of its assessment procedures and unit operations.98Summary: Growth Areas 2010-11*Praxis II Pass Rate Pass rate of 94% based on 10-11Praxis policyPPD SeminarsWorkshops with Arts & Science facultyAnalyze syllabi for Praxis II contentPolicy on passing before exitTechnologyInfinite CampusKTS Data in Advanced ProgramsMAE: Action Research ProjectRank I: culminating project in school improvementDevelop a rubric to measure KTS in each projectIdentify other course embedded assignments to generate KTS data

New Growth Areas 2011-12KTS 9: Professional Development

Differentiation/Diverse student needs99100MAE/Rank I Growth AreasMAE:Data on major assessments used in the program-Action Research projectCapability to show evidence of KTSDiversity: 100% whiteField HoursRank ICollect evidence of KTSField hours

101Summary: Growth Areas-SEDTRACs 3 & 4:Portfolio: KTS 9 (professional development)

TRACs 5 & 6:Major assessment data for KTS

Chart82.612.752.932.7132.612.252.822.52.72.692.672.92.562.752.642.332.762.632.782.6522.92.442.672.712.752.822.52.562.8632.912.692.92.862.52.862.692.92.8932.772.812.892.692.672.732.52.62.712.52.772.732.9

CAP 3 Portfolio MeansIECE: Overall & All Locations 2010AllC'villeE'townL'villeSomerset

Sheet1F20082009KTS 1 Content2.752.76KTS 2 Plan2.632.63KTS 3 Climate2.912.9KTS 4 Implem.2.662.58KTS 5 Assess2.512.44KTS 6 Tech.2.652.58KTS 7 Reflect2.682.46KTS 8 Collab2.752.54KTS 9 Prof.Gr.2.82.6KTS 10 Ldrshp.2.852.6Holistic2.72.49Average2.722.6

Sheet1000000000000000000000000

F20082009CAP 3 Portfolio Holistic Scores

CAP 3 PortfolioAverageKTSf, 20082009Year,2010Holistic ScoreHol2.72.532.44KTS 1 ContentKTS 1 Con.2.752.742.44KTS 2 DesignKTS 2 Des.2.632.672.56KTS 3 ClimateKTS 3 Clim.2.912.952.76KTS 4 ImplementKTS 4 Impl.2.662.62.64KTS 5 AssessKTS 5 Assess2.512.422.54KTS 6 TechnologyKTS 6 Tech.2.652.532.59KTS 7 ReflectKTS 7 Reflect2.682.52.67KTS 8 CollaborateKTS 8 Collab.2.752.562.63KTS 9 Prof. GrowthKTS 9 Prof. Gr.2.82.62.48KTS 10 LeadershipKTS 10 Ldrshp.2.852.562.48P-5KTS20092010Hol.2.82.67KTS 1 Con.2.972.67KTS 2 Des.2.862.67KTS 3 Clim.33KTS 4 Impl.2.833KTS 5 Assess2.773KTS 6 Tech.2.813KTS 7 Reflect2.743KTS 8 Collab.2.813KTS 9 Prof. Gr.2.812.67KTS 10 Ldrshp.2.833Middle Grades20092010Hol.2.672.75KTS 1 Con.2.72.75KTS 2 Des.2.72.75KTS 3 Clim.2.92.67KTS 4 Impl.2.682.75KTS 5 Assess2.632.75KTS 6 Tech.2.62.75KTS 7 Reflect2.652.75KTS 8 Collab.2.83KTS 9 Prof. Gr.2.82.75KTS 10 Ldrshp.2.72.25Grades 8-1220092010Hol.2.62.67KTS 1 Con.2.752.67KTS 2 Des.2.563KTS 3 Clim.2.943KTS 4 Impl.2.692.5KTS 5 Assess2.443KTS 6 Tech.2.752.67KTS 7 Reflect2.53KTS 8 Collab.2.562.67KTS 9 Prof. Gr.2.752.67KTS 10 Ldrshp.2.632.33Grades P-1220092010Holistic2.772.2KTS 1 Content2.862.2KTS 2 Design2.862.2KTS 3 Climate2.933KTS 4 Implem.2.642.25KTS 5 Assess.2.572.4KTS 6 Tech.2.642.6KTS 7 Reflect2.612.4KTS 8 Collab.2.552.4KTS 9 Prof. Gr.2.792.4KTS 10 Ldrshp.2.722.4P-5Grades 5-9Grades 8-12Grades P-12Holistic2.82.672.62.77KTS 1 Content2.972.72.752.86KTS 2 Design2.862.72.562.86KTS 3 Climate32.92.942.93KTS 4 Design2.732.682.692.64KTS 5 Assess2.772.632.442.57KTS 6 Technology2.812.62.752.64KTS 7 Reflect2.742.652.52.61KTS 8 Collaborate2.812.82.562.55KTS 9 Prof. Growth2.812.82.752.79KTS 10 Leadership2.832.72.632.72IECEAllC'villeE'townL'villeSomersetHolistic2.612.752.932.713IECE 1 Design2.612.252.822.52.7IECE 2 Environ.2.692.672.92.562.75IECE 3 Implem.2.642.332.762.632.78IECE 4 Assess2.6522.92.442.67IECE 5 Reflect2.712.752.822.52.56IECE 6 Collab.2.8632.912.692.9IECE 7 Prof. Dev.2.862.52.862.692.9IECE 8 Families2.8932.772.812.89IECE 9 Tech2.692.672.732.52.6IECE 10 Ldrshp2.712.52.772.732.9

CAP 3 Portfolio

2009Year,2010Average CAP 3 Portfolios 2009-10

CAP 4 Portfolio

200920105-9 CAP 3 Portfolio Means 2009-10

CAP 4 FormA

P-5Grades 5-9Grades 8-12Grades P-12CAP 3 Portfolio Scores 2009

CAP 3 Portfolio Means 2008-2010f, 20082009Year,2010

P-5 CAP 3 Portfolio Scores for 2009-1020092010

8-12 CAP 3 Portfolio Means 2009-1020092010

P-12 Portfolio Means for 2009-1020092010

CAP 3 Portfolio MeansIECE: Overall & All Locations 2010AllC'villeE'townL'villeSomerset

CAP 4 PortfoliosOverallP-5MidGrGr 8-12P-12Holistic Score2.8332.52.5KTS 1 Con.2.8532.672.673KTS 2 Des.2.7732.672.333KTS 3 Clim.2.7932.672.672.67KTS 4 Impl.2.6232.672.332.33KTS 5 Assess2.672.672.672.672.67KTS 6 Tech.2.8332.3333KTS 7 Reflect2.6732.6722.5KTS 8 Collab.2.79332.332.67KTS 9 Prof. Gr.2.7932.672.672.67KTS 10 Ldrshp.2.8632.6732.67AllCUE-townL'villeSomersetGPR2.88232.833IECE 1 Des2.79232.672.75IECE 2 Clim2.89232.833IECE 3 Impl2.8422.882.833IECE 4 Assess2.6822.752.53IECE 5 Refl2.6332.752.332.75IECE 6 Collab2.8432.882.673IECE 7 Prof. Dev.2.6822.752.672.75IECE 8 Fam2.7232.52.833IECE 9 Tech2.5332.382.52.75IECE 10 Ldrshp2.8422.882.833

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

OverallP-5MidGrGr 8-12P-12CAP 4 Portfolio Means: Fall, 2010by Certification Level

0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

AllCUE-townL'villeSomersetIECE CAP 4 Portfolio Means, F 2010

CAP 4 Form AHolistic ScoreKTS 1 ContentKTS 2 DesignKTS 3 ClimateKTS 4 ImplementKTS 5 AssessKTS 6 TechnologyKTS 7 ReflectKTS 8 CollaborateKTS 9 Prof. GrowthKTS 10 Leadership