data-driven strategies for international student recruitment · data-driven strategies for...
TRANSCRIPT
Data-Driven Strategies for International Student Recruitment
NAFSA National ConferenceMay 27, 2015
2:45 PM – 3:45 PM
Dr. Kris Wong Davis – The Ohio State UniversityDr. Mandy Hansen – Northern Arizona University
Mr. Samuel Heikinen – St. Francis University
Agenda
• Large, competitive school perspective• Mid-sized, public institutional perspective• Small, private institutional perspectives
• Session: Beginner to Intermediate• Learning Outcomes: How an institution can use data to
set-up and design and enrollment strategy; Gain an understanding of data used from a large-public, mid-sized public and small private institution;
What is data?
Quantitative
&Qualitative
Kristina Wong Davis, Ed.D. Director, Outreach and Recruitment
Autumn 2014• By the numbers
– 58,322 Campus Enrollment
– 42,800 Applications for NFYS
– 19,450 Admits
– 45% Admit Rate
– Approx. 7000 freshmen
– Average ACT 29
International Enrollment• By the numbers
– 8% International students
– 6,178 International students enrolled
– China top sending country
– 118 Countries represented
Test Taking Data Sets• Enrollment Planning and Data
– Test Taker Data
– Score sender Data
– EPS
– Competitive analysis via CB (overlap
schools)
– Score senders by major/country
School
Total International Score Senders
Cross Over Score Senders
School 1 East Coast 5042 1547
School 2 Mid West 4911 1469
School 3 Mid West 5388 1285
School 4 North East 6283 967
School 5 West Coast 3279 918
School 6 Upper Mid West 2858 915
School 7 West Coast 5710 742
School 8 West Coast 6942 737
School 9 Mid West 2057 724
School 10 West Coast 3109 665
Overlap of Score Senders by Competitor Institution
*Source: College Board Enrollment Planning Service 2015
Internal Analysis• Empowering Market Analysis
– Test Taker Data
– IIE mobility
– Currency rates
– OECD
Predictive Modeling• Probability of Enrollment
• Yield projections
• Melt projections
• Use behavioral analysis trends
• Program student applied to
• When application was submitted
• Country of citizenship
• Applicant quality metrics
Dr. Mandy Hansen• Associate Director of the Center for International Education• Director of International Admissions and Recruitment
Presentation Overview
Brief Overview of NAUDesign of an Initial Plan
Basic Predictive Modeling
Flagstaff
nau.edu/cie
Las Vegas
Phoenix
Sedona
The Grand Canyon
Los Angeles
Elevation of 2200 meters
Population of 65,000
288 days of sunshine
Average summer temperature 25º; winter temperature of 5º
nau.edu/cie
nau.edu/cie
Mid-sized public university with 20,134 Students• Undergraduates: 18,524• Graduates: 1,610
1,246 International Students
~100 undergraduate degrees and over 50 graduate degreesBusiness, engineering, science, social science, liberal arts, education
nau.edu/cie
MissionThe Center for International Education sees its mission as working to prepare NAU graduates for global citizenship.
Quick FactsNumber of visiting scholars: 63
Contribution of international education to the Arizona economy: $367.9
Number of countries represented by international students and scholars: 65
Number of faculty-led programs: 23Number of students in our Global Science and
Engineering Program: 120Number of academic departments committed to
global learning: 76Top five destinations for study abroad: UK, Costa
Rica, Spain, Italy and AustraliaTop countries represented on campus: China,
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Brazil, Germany and South Korea
Number of students at the International House: 196 from 28 countries
Center for International Education
NAFSA Paul Simon Award for Campus Internationalization – 2012
nau.edu/cie
Presentation Overview
Internal Review
Peer Institutional Analysis
National Trend Analysis
Lessons Learned
Three-Year Historical Review
Enrolled students’:OriginMajorsDegree LevelEntry Level
Top Sending Countries in 2007
ChinaGermany Saudi ArabiaJapanNetherlands
Defining Terms
International vs. domestic students
Definitions impact recruitment territories
Daily ApplicationSummary Report
Tracked numbers and history
Showed:
Applications
Cancelled applications
Admitted, accepted, and enrolled students
Undergraduate Application Summary Report
Where did Northern Arizona University match or differ from
national trends?
For Example…
Define TerritoriesMarketsHigh schoolsESL programsCommunity Colleges
Noel-Levitz Chart
Noel-Levitz (2012). 2012 recruitment funnel benchmarks report for four-year private and public institutions . Coralville, Iowa: Noel-Levitz. Retrieved from www.noellevitz.com/BenchmarkReports.
Table 8: Four-Year Public Institution – Funnel Rates for In-State, Out-of-State, and International Freshman
Peer Institutional Analysis
Total PopulationInternational Student PopulationPercentage Analysis Growth or Decline
Peer Data Spreadsheet
Northern Arizona’s Growth Chart
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008Fall 2009
Fall 2010Fall 2011
Fall 2012Fall 2013
Fall 2014
419 458 506573
858 911989
1083
1246
TOTAL INTERNATIONAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT
Northern Arizona’s Growth Chart
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2007-2008 2008-20092009-2010
2010-20112011-2012
2012-20132013-2014
2014-2015
TOTA
LS
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015Totals 221 282 355 575 566 438 574 599
New Undergraduate International Student Enrollment
Predictive Modeling
Compiled annual summaries
Created bank of data
Useful in predicting each semester’s overall enrollment numbers
Example
APPLICATIONS SUMMARY ANALYSIS
From 21-Day Count Daily Report Summary from IRM
Lessons Learned
More is Better
Revisit Plan and Data
Incorporate Student Input
Student FeedbackSurvey Responses
Student Feedback
Recruitment brochure
How NAU sends admissions decisions
Campus and Community Feedback
Design extended orientation class for international students
Work in Progress
St. Francis UniversitySamuel Heikinen, Director, International Student Programs
St. Francis UniversitySmall, private Catholic University
2,400 students including undergraduate and graduate
128 International Students
28 Countries
Intensive ESL program
Athletics
SFU History and Facts History
Heavy academics-Programs
Regional reputation
Environment
Current International Population
SFU DataUnique situation: Formerly only international student athletes
Doubled international population over past two years
Main countries: Brazil, China, Saudi Arabia, Canada
International Enrollment History Formerly no/few International Students
Past decades introduced mostly international athletes with English proficiencies
Little data tracking
Past two years: Introduction of Intensive English Program, new non-athlete population
Focus Groups
Current International Population128 Students
Brazil BSMP/IIE
Saudi Arabia/SACM
Challenges of sponsored students as bulk of population
China, Canada
Other
New Mission to Recruit International Students: DataPredictive Modeling—Data?
Collectively establishing how/what data moving forward
Unique History of International Enrollments, very hard to predict based on past numbers
Maintaining current feeds
Exploring new markets
Marketing SFU Brand Current and Past Niche—strengths and weaknesses
Following demand through market data—Which new markets
Exploration, success and failure, explore and develop
Using SFU flexibility and strengths to further develop brand and niche according to market needs
Petroleum Engineering, Internships
Challenges of New International Recruitment Initiatives Data
Establishing global “SFU Niche”, Marketing and Promotion—formerly all domestic, now new international marketing based on data and needs
Creation of SFU Intensive English Program
International Admissions Process
SEVIS
Scholarships
Strategy Moving ForwardFollowing the Data
On-Site Recruitment, Sponsored Students, Agents, Partnerships, Niche
Market Analysis
Establishing/tweaking Market Niche to attract specific market groups
Leveraging costs through Scholarships
Playing to strengths
Strategies and results
Market Analysis: Asia, Middle East, Other countries
Focus on private Catholic, regional, academic, environment niche
Other qualities unique to SFU
Lessons learned thus far, continued efforts moving forward
E-mail welcome:
Conclusion
Variety of Institutional Perspectives – presentation is posted online
Questions from the Audience