data on blasting

Upload: katyola-tembo

Post on 07-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    1/12

    Data on Blasting

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    2/12

    PRODUCTION BLASTING

    PIT: MAIN 2

    BENCH:1345-1340

    BLAST NO: 25 DATE:

    25-04-08

    BLAST QUANTITIES

    HOLE NO PLANNED DEPTH(m)

    ACTUAL

    DEPTH(m) CHARGE(40kg/Hole)

    DESIGN

    STEMMING

    LENGTH(m)

    ACTUAL STEM

    LENGTH(m)

    DESIGN

    CARGE

    DENSITY

    ACTUAL

    CHARGE

    DENSITY

    16346 5.7 6.5 40 2.2 3.0 1.2 1.4

    16347 5.7 6.7 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.7

    16348 5.9 6.8 40 2.2 3 1.2 1.5

    16350 6 6.8 40 2.4 2.8 1.2 1.9

    16370 5.6 6.8 40 2.2 2.3 1.2 1.2

    16371 5.7 6.9 40 2.2 2.3 1.2 1.2

    16372 5.7 6.5 40 2.2 2.5 1.2 1.5

    16373 5.7 6 40 2.2 2.3 1.2 1.2

    16374 5.7 6.7 40 2.2 2.7 1.2 1.3

    16376 6 6.3 40 2.4 2.5 1.2 1.3

    16446 5.7 7 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.4

    16444 5.6 6.8 40 2.2 2.8 1.2 1.5

    16442 5.6 6.4 40 2.2 2.5 1.2 1.2

    16440 5.6 6.5 40 2.2 2.9 1.2 1.5

    16438 5.7 6.5 40 2.2 2.6 1.2 1.5

    16436 5.7 6.6 40 2.2 2.6 1.2 1.3

    16257 5.5 5.9 40 2.2 2.3. 1.2 1.2

    16257 5.5 6.1 40 2.2 2.6 1.2 1.216260 5.7 7 40 2.2 3.0 1.2 1.2

    TABLE 1: CHARGE DENSITIES AND CHARGE MASSES (INEFFECTIVE CHARGING PROCESS)

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    3/12

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    4/12

    TABLE 3: CHARGE DENSITIES AND CHARGE MASSES (INEFFECTIVE CHARGING PROCESS)

    PRODUCTION BLASTING

    PIT: MAIN 2 BENCH:1345-1340 BLAST NO:

    25 DATE: 25-04-08

    BLAST QUANTITIES

    HOLE NO PLANNED DEPTH(m) ACTUAL DEPTH(m) CHARGE(40kg/Hole)

    DESIGN STEMMING

    LENGTH(m)

    ACTUAL STEM

    LENGTH(m)

    DESIGN CHARGE

    DENSITY

    ACTUAL

    CHARGE

    DENSITY

    16346 5.7 6.5 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.4

    16347 5.7 6.7 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.7

    16348 5.9 6.8 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.5

    16350 6 6.8 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.9

    16370 5.6 6.8 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.2

    16371 5.7 6.9 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.2

    16372 5.7 6.5 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.5

    16373 5.7 6 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.2

    16374 5.7 6.7 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.3

    16376 6 6.3 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.3

    16446 5.7 7 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.4

    16444 5.6 6.8 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.5

    16442 5.6 6.4 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.2

    16440 5.6 6.5 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.5

    16438 5.7 6.5 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.6

    16436 5.7 6.6 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.3

    16257 5.5 5.9 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.2

    16257 5.5 6.1 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.2

    16260 5.7 7 40 2.2 3.2 1.2 1.2

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    5/12

    Effects of over-stemming blastholes

    Over-fragmentation of the

    ground in the lower part

    of the blasthole after

    blasting

    Ground

    surface

    Large boulders left in

    the top part of the

    blasthole (due to over-

    stemming) after

    blasting

    Position of

    blasthole

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    6/12

    Stemming

    Effects of Ineffective Stemming Effects of Effective Stemming

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    7/12

    Evidence Boulders At Kansanshi

    Mine

    Boulders

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    8/12

    EVIDENCE OFPOOR STEMMING MATERIAL (UNGRADED STONE AGGREGATES) AT

    KANSANSHI

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    9/12

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    10/12

    Optimum stemming Thus, confining the gasses in the hole for as long as possible is important in maximizing the

    blast efficiency

    The following errors of stemming can occur:

    Too little stemming will allow the explosive gasses to vent, creating fly rock and air blast

    problems as well as reducing the effectiveness of the blast.

    Too much stemming will result in poorly fragmented rock near the top. This is especially

    apparent with hard cap rock formations.

    Over-stemming of blastholes causes creation of boulders on the topparts of blasthole whilethe bottom of the blasthole is over-fragmented. Over-stemming is very rampant at Kansanshi

    mine.

    Short stemming length results in loss of energy into the atmosphere. This leads to:

    Excessive fly rock and dust.

    Excessive air blast.

    Possible poor fragmentation, especially in the toe region. High bottoms likelihood. Reduced heave of the rock mass.

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    11/12

    OPTIMUM STEMMING LENGTH

    STEMMING LENGTH

    The optimum length of stemming depends mainly on the hole diameter. The longer the

    stemming length, the higher the confining pressure. Optimum stemming length should be in

    range the 20-30 the blasthole diameter depending the rock strength and type of stemming

    material. Standard stemming lengths based on the hole diameter are as follows:

    For hard capping layer, use 15 hole diameter as stemming length.

    For normal blasting, use 20 hole diameter as stemming length.

    To limit fly rock, use 25 hole diameter as stemming length.

    For no fly rock at all, use 30 hole diameter as stemming length

  • 8/6/2019 Data on Blasting

    12/12

    Stemming materials arranged according their effectiveness

    AIR

    CLAY

    WATER

    GRADED CRUSHED AGGREGATE

    WITH STEM PLUG

    DRILL CUTTINGS COARSE WITH

    STEM PLUG

    GRADED CRUSHED AGGREGATE

    DRILL CUTTINGS FINES GRAINS

    UNGRADED CRUSHED

    AGGREGATE

    DRILL CUTTINGS COARSE

    GRAINSBEST

    STEMMING

    MATERIAL(mosteffective or best

    option)

    WORST

    STEMMING

    MATERIAL(less

    effective or worst

    option)