data packet - dallasisd.org › cms › lib › tx01001475 › centricity › doma… · 2 notes...
TRANSCRIPT
JOHN W. CARPENTERJOHN W. CARPENTERJOHN W. CARPENTERJOHN W. CARPENTER
School Number 121School Number 121School Number 121School Number 121
Published
August 24, 2012
Data PacketData PacketData PacketData Packetfor 2012-13 Planningfor 2012-13 Planningfor 2012-13 Planningfor 2012-13 Planning
Evaluation and AccountabilityEvaluation and AccountabilityEvaluation and AccountabilityEvaluation and AccountabilityData Analysis, Reporting, and Research ServicesData Analysis, Reporting, and Research ServicesData Analysis, Reporting, and Research ServicesData Analysis, Reporting, and Research Services
http://mydata.dallasisd.orghttp://mydata.dallasisd.orghttp://mydata.dallasisd.orghttp://mydata.dallasisd.org
[email protected]@[email protected]@dallasisd.org
Table of Contents2012-13 Data Packet: Standard Issue
2. Contents .................. Table of Contents 3. Notes ....................... Notes and Data Descriptions
STUDENTS AND STAFF5. Summary ................. Summary of Student and Teacher Statistics 6. Enrollment (1) .......... Enrollment Statistics by Ethnicity
7. Enrollment (2) .......... Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group 8. Attendance .............. Student Attendance Statistics
9. Teachers ................. Teacher Statistics
STAAR10. 3-8 Reading ............. STAAR 3-8 Reading 13. 3-8 Writing ............... STAAR 3-8 Writing
15. 3-8 Math .................. STAAR 3-8 Mathematics 18. 3-8 Science ............. STAAR 3-8 Science
20. Spanish Reading ..... Spanish STAAR 3-8 Reading
ITBS & LOGRAMOS23. Compliance ............. SCE Compliance for At-Risk Students 24. ITBS Read ............... ITBS Reading
26. ITBS Math ............... ITBS Mathematics 30. LOG Read ............... Logramos Reading
ENGLISH PROFICIENCY32. WMLS ...................... Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey 33. TELPAS ................... Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_CONTENTS 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 2
2Notes, Definitions, and Data DescriptionsNotes
Student percentages are computed as the percentage of total student enrollment.•
Additional statistics are available in ENROLLMENT and TEACHER reports.•
“Economically disadvantaged” students are those who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch through the federal government's program.•Teacher demographics and assignments are those reported to the TEA in the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission for the district.•
2011-12 SCHOOL SUMMARY
Race/ethnic categories are based on the newest federal standards for ethnicity and race reporting, though some categories have been combined because of small group sizes. Students reporting their ethnicity as “Hispanic” are not counted in any race category.
•
Statistics are based on the school's enrollment at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period.•
“Economically disadvantaged” students are those receiving free or reduced-price lunches.•
The “retention rate” is the percentage of students in the same grade at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period for both 2010-11 and 2011-12.•“New” students were new to the district in 2011-12. They are counted as new if not enrolled in a district campus before the last day of the 2010-11 school year.•
ENROLLMENT
For 2010-11 forward, race/ethnic categories are based on the newest federal standards for ethnicity and race reporting, though some categories have been combined because of small group sizes; students reporting their ethnicity as “Hispanic” are not counted in any race category. For prior years, race/ethnicity is based on the previous categories.
•
• Statistics are based on student attendance through the end of the sixth six-weeks grading period (the end of the school year).• “Average daily membership” is the total number of school days students were ENROLLED divided by the number of school days in the year.• The “average daily attendance” number (N) is the total number of school days students were IN ATTENDANCE divided by the number of school days in the year. The “average
daily attendance” percentage (%) is the average attendance rate. For each student, the number of days attended is divided by the number of days enrolled. This rate is then averaged across students.
• The number (N) of “yearly transactions” is the total number of transfer and withdrawal transactions in the school year. The percentage (%) is the number of transactions divided by “average daily membership,” which gives (on average) the percentage of the membership associated with a transaction.
• “Continuously enrolled” students are enrolled for a minimum number of instructional days between the beginning of the school year and the first day of the main TAKS testing period. This number varies from 125 to 130 depending on the calendar in a particular school year.
• The “stability rate” is the number of continuously enrolled students divided by “average daily membership.”
ATTENDANCE
• Teacher demographics and assignments are those reported to the TEA in the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission for the district.
TEACHERS
• Teacher absences counted towards the average DO NOT include vacation days (coded as VAC in personnel database).• Retention rate for a school year is computed with numerator “# of teachers assigned to the school both that year and the year prior” and denominator “# of teachers assigned to
the school for the prior year.” That is, the retention rate is the percentage of the prior year's teachers who continued at the school.
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_NOTES 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 3
2Notes, Definitions, and Data DescriptionsNotes
Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested.••
••
Student group assignments are those reported to the TEA in the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission for the district.
Statistics by reporting category are averages for all students (across student groups and genders).An “average percentage correct” is computed as follows: for each student, divide the number of items correctly answered by the total number of items in the test section, then average the resulting percentages across all students. For short answers on EOC reading tests, an “average rating” is presented; STAAR EOC short answers are rated on a scale of 0 to 3. For written compositions on writing tests, “average score points” is presented. STAAR compositions are rated twice on a scale of 0 to 4. The two ratings are summed for a range of possible score points from 0 to 8.
• STAAR statistics are based on results from the standard STAAR only. STAAR L and STAAR M statistics are computed separately, following the TEA's reporting practice.
STAAR, STAAR L, and STAAR M
• STAAR M reports not currently available. At time of publication, insufficient information was available from the TEA to produce meaningful statistics for reporting.
• Exclusive for 2012: Until standards are released in Spring 2013, the “Percentage Satisfactory” report is replaced by “Percentage Meeting Equivalent TAKS Standard” for reading and mathematics. (Equivalent standards not produced by TEA for other STAAR subjects.) The “Number not Satisfactory” report is replaced by “Average Number of Items Correct.”
••
Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested.Student group assignments are based on demographic data in the Dallas ISD student database.
• Kindergarten ITBS reading statistics are based on the Reading Profile Total (a combination of the Vocabulary, Word Analysis, and Listening subtests) for all years available. All other grades' ITBS reading statistics, and Logramos reading statistics for all grades, are based on Reading Total results. (Reading Total results are not available with use of the ITBS level 5R form administered in kindergarten.) “Number tested” statistics include kindergarten.
• Kindergarten ITBS mathematics statistics are based on the Mathematics subtest. All other grades' statistics are based on Mathematics Total results. (Mathematics Total summaries are not available with use of the ITBS level 5R form administered in kindergarten.) “Number tested” statistics include kindergarten.
• Mathematics Total results used for data packets are combinations of the Mathematics Concepts, Problems, and Computation subtest results. For schools who did not administer Mathematics Concepts or Mathematics Problems to their students, Mathematics Computation statistics are provided separately.
SCE COMPLIANCE and ITBS / ITED / LOGRAMOS
•
• If a student's composite rating did not increase at least one level from 2011 to 2012, the TEA did not report the 2011 composite rating.
Students are counted as having tested if any one of the four domains is rated. Because a TELPAS composite rating is not assigned to a student unless all four domains are rated, the number of TELPAS composite ratings may be smaller than the number tested.
• If a student is rated as advanced high in 2012, the TEA does not differentiate between the advanced and advanced high levels from 2011.
TELPAS
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_NOTES 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 4
Summary 2011-12 Group Summary Statistics
Grade
STUDENT ENROLLMENT
Enrollment
PK 41
KN 54
1 57
2 57
3 49
4 48
5 46
6 40
ALL 392
STUDENT AND TEACHER RACE/ETHNICITY
Students
Number Percent Number PercentEthnicity/Race
Black/African American
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
White
Multiple
216 55.1
1 0.3
0 0.0
173 44.1
1 0.3
20 66.7
5 16.7
4 13.3
1 3.3
* *
* *
1 0.3
SELECT STUDENT GROUP ENROLLMENT
Number PercentGroup
Economically disadvantaged
Limited English proficient (LEP)
Special education
384 98.0
123 31.4
22 5.6
*For teachers, “Other” category includes American Indican/Alaska Native and Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander.
Not reported (students only) — —0 0.0
Other* (teachers only) 0 0.0— —
Talented and Gifted (TAG) 28 7.1
At-Risk 238 60.7
Teachers
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_SUMMARY 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 5
N %
Asian
%NN %%
Hispanic
N N %Grade Year
African American American Indian
Enrollment
White
Enrolllment Statistics by Race/EthnicityEnrollment (1)
N %
Multiple category
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
54.2
69.7
53.7
13
23
22
45.8
30.3
43.9
11
10
18
0.0
0.0
2.4
0
0
1
PK
41
33
24 —
0.0
0.0
—
0
0
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
50.0
50.0
48.1
23
23
26
50.0
50.0
51.9
23
23
28
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
KN
54
46
46 —
0.0
0.0
—
0
0
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
1.7
0.0
0
1
0
37.3
44.1
42.1
19
26
24
62.7
54.2
57.9
32
32
33
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
1
57
59
51 —
0.0
0.0
—
0
0
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
47.3
40.4
49.1
26
19
28
52.7
59.6
50.9
29
28
29
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
2
57
47
55 —
0.0
0.0
—
0
0
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
39.1
50.0
38.8
18
23
19
60.9
50.0
61.2
28
23
30
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
3
49
46
46 —
0.0
0.0
—
0
0
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
2.1
0
0
1
43.6
45.7
39.6
17
21
19
56.4
54.3
56.3
22
25
27
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
4
48
46
39 —
0.0
2.1
—
0
1
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
27.5
42.2
43.5
14
19
20
72.5
55.6
56.5
37
25
26
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
5
46
45
51 —
0.0
0.0
—
0
0
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
37.2
35.2
37.5
16
19
15
62.8
64.8
62.5
27
35
25
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
6
40
54
43 —
0.0
0.0
—
0
0
2012
2010
2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.3
0.3
0
1
1
41.1
46.0
44.1
146
173
173
58.9
53.5
55.1
209
201
216
0.0
0.0
0.3
0
0
1
PK-6
392
376
355 —
0.0
0.3
—
0
1
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ENROLL_ETH 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 6
N %
At RIsk New (to District)
N %
TAG
N %
Economically Disadvantaged
Grade Year
LEP Special Education
N % N % N %
Retention Rate (%)
Enrollment
Enrollment Statistics by Select Student GroupEnrollment (2)
Gender
% Male % Female
12.5
51.5
41.5
3
17
17
100.0
100.0
100.0
PK
2012 41
33
24 100.0
97.0
97.6
24
32
40
33.3
54.5
41.5
8
18
17
4.2
0.0
0.0
1
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2010
2011
24
33
41
70.8
42.4
48.8
29.2
57.6
51.2
34.8
71.7
37.0
16
33
20
54.3
30.4
42.6
KN
2012 54
46
46 91.3
97.8
100.0
42
45
54
21.7
41.3
35.2
10
19
19
2.2
2.2
3.7
1
1
2
6.5
8.7
0.0
3
4
0
0.0
2.2
0.0
2010
2011
25
14
23
65.2
52.2
51.9
34.8
47.8
48.1
78.4
69.5
40.4
40
41
23
15.7
8.5
24.6
1
2012 57
59
51 94.1
89.8
100.0
48
53
57
25.5
32.2
31.6
13
19
18
3.9
5.1
1.8
2
3
1
3.9
11.9
3.5
2
7
2
3.9
8.5
8.8
2010
2011
8
5
14
52.9
61.0
43.9
47.1
39.0
56.1
76.4
89.4
66.7
42
42
38
7.3
6.4
19.3
2
2012 57
47
55 89.1
91.5
94.7
49
43
54
36.4
34.0
33.3
20
16
19
3.6
10.6
7.0
2
5
4
5.5
14.9
12.3
3
7
7
1.8
17.0
0.0
2010
2011
4
3
11
63.6
53.2
52.6
36.4
46.8
47.4
69.6
78.3
81.6
32
36
40
19.6
6.5
16.3
3
2012 49
46
46 87.0
95.7
95.9
40
44
47
30.4
41.3
26.5
14
19
13
4.3
2.2
6.1
2
1
3
6.5
13.0
10.2
3
6
5
6.5
2.2
0.0
2010
2011
9
3
8
37.0
69.6
55.1
63.0
30.4
44.9
59.0
60.9
83.3
23
28
40
7.7
2.2
6.3
4
2012 48
46
39 97.4
93.5
100.0
38
43
48
25.6
32.6
33.3
10
15
16
15.4
10.9
4.2
6
5
2
17.9
13.0
12.5
7
6
6
0.0
2.2
0.0
2010
2011
3
1
3
38.5
50.0
70.8
61.5
50.0
29.2
54.9
51.1
80.4
28
23
37
7.8
17.8
15.2
5
2012 46
45
51 92.2
95.6
97.8
47
43
45
11.8
28.9
28.3
6
13
13
13.7
8.9
10.9
7
4
5
25.5
22.2
4.3
13
10
2
3.9
8.9
6.5
2010
2011
4
8
7
54.9
48.9
47.8
45.1
51.1
52.2
51.2
59.3
57.5
22
32
23
7.0
13.0
27.5
6
2012 40
54
43 97.7
94.4
97.5
42
51
39
14.0
14.8
20.0
6
8
8
16.3
13.0
12.5
7
7
5
16.3
20.4
15.0
7
11
6
0.0
0.0
0.0
2010
2011
3
7
11
53.5
51.9
65.0
46.5
48.1
35.0
58.0
67.0
60.7
206
252
238
22.5
19.7
30.1
PK-6
2012 392
376
355 93.0
94.1
98.0
330
354
384
24.5
33.8
31.4
87
127
123
7.9
6.9
5.6
28
26
22
10.7
13.6
7.1
38
51
28
2.3
5.3
2.0
2010
2011
80
74
118
54.1
54.3
54.1
45.9
45.7
45.9
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ENROLL_OTH 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 7
Stability Rate
%
ContinuouslyEnrolled
N DistrictNN
Average DailyMembership
Average Daily Attendance Yearly Transactions
Grade Year N %District District N District % % District % District
Student Attendance StatisticsAttendance
69.0
69.4
65.2
30
37
30
11,233
11,731
11,602
22
19
18KN
2010 93.841 50.6 21.5
2011
2012 94.450 35.6 20.1
94.243 39.1 21.4
13,234
13,633
13,211
95.3
96.0
95.7
12,616
13,086
12,645
84.9
86.0
87.8
43
53
46
83.2
78.2
70.1
42
40
40
11,978
12,292
12,047
15
19
241
2010 95.848 29.7 20.0
2011
2012 95.249 37.2 18.6
94.554 42.0 19.0
13,848
14,026
13,458
95.9
96.5
96.4
13,286
13,533
12,967
86.5
87.6
89.5
50
51
57
81.2
82.4
94.0
44
45
43
11,794
11,883
11,853
20
19
102
2010 95.552 36.9 18.9
2011
2012 95.952 34.8 17.0
97.244 21.9 17.1
13,441
13,338
13,013
96.3
97.0
96.8
12,947
12,932
12,593
87.7
89.1
91.1
54
55
46
84.9
79.7
85.9
38
39
40
11,815
11,592
11,604
9
18
223
2010 95.743 20.1 17.6
2011
2012 97.047 36.8 15.6
95.845 47.2 16.6
13,291
12,874
12,619
96.7
97.2
97.1
12,854
12,508
12,254
88.9
90.0
92.0
45
49
47
78.3
78.0
86.9
32
37
39
10,987
11,218
11,544
10
10
144
2010 95.839 24.5 17.2
2011
2012 96.646 21.1 16.7
94.843 31.2 15.7
12,300
12,493
12,506
96.8
97.2
97.1
11,900
12,139
12,150
89.3
89.8
92.3
41
47
45
86.1
76.4
84.5
44
36
35
10,453
11,364
10,892
13
3
195
2010 96.049 25.4 17.0
2011
2012 96.545 6.4 5.4
97.340 45.9 8.2
11,688
12,562
11,742
96.8
97.3
97.2
11,310
12,220
11,419
89.4
90.5
92.8
51
47
41
78.5
80.5
79.9
33
30
42
9,083
9,420
9,074
22
5
36
2010 96.741 52.3 18.3
2011
2012 97.436 13.4 17.9
95.050 5.7 17.1
10,602
10,683
10,126
95.4
96.6
96.2
10,111
10,315
9,742
85.7
88.2
89.6
42
37
53
80.5
77.7
80.5
263
264
269
77,343
79,500
78,616
111
93
110KN-6
2010 95.6313 34.0 18.7
2011
2012 96.0326 27.4 16.0
95.5319 32.9 16.6
88,404
89,609
86,676
96.2
96.8
96.6
85,025
86,734
83,770
87.5
88.7
90.7
327
340
334
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ATTENDANCE 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 8
Teacher StatisticsTeachers
6.7
Percentage
2Beginning (0)
81 - 5
56 - 10
711 - 20
8More than 20
Years Number
83.9
86.7
—
1
70.021
30.09
3.3
16.75
66.720
13.34White
African American
Hispanic
Multiple
Male
Female
7.6
6.7
Number PercentageEthnicity/Race
DISTRIBUTIONS YEARS EXPERIENCE
Teachers: 30
9.0
Average Absences
RetentionRate
26.7
16.7
23.3
26.7
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Number PercentageGender
3.311
3.312
10.033
16.751-3
3.314
6.725
23More than 3 76.7
0 0.0Other
ATTENDANCE / RETENTION
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_TEACHER 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 9
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING
PERCENTAGE MEETING TAKS PASSING STANDARD
STAAR Read (1)
43.8 73.7 84.02012 59.3 62.5 61.3 * 60.0 3554.2
3
2010
2011
62.5 53.8 76.82012 * 60.0 44.4 58.3 42.9 59.5 3747.6
4
2010
2011
57.9 77.8 80.32012 71.4 62.5 63.6 * 66.7 67.6 3752.4
5
2010
2011
79.2 69.2 77.62012 81.8 66.7 79.4 37.5 75.7 3758.8
6
2010
2011
62.7 69.8 79.52012 * 67.4 60.4 65.7 * 46.2 65.8 14653.0
3-6
2010
2011
0 83 63 32,2282012 1 4895 134 1 26 14683
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-6
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_read_1_per_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 10
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING
AVERAGE NUMBER (#) OF ITEMS CORRECT
STAAR Read (2)
15 20 232012 17 18 18 * 18 3515
3
2010
2011
20 20 262012 * 20 17 20 16 20 3717
4
2010
2011
25 26 292012 26 25 25 * 25 25 3722
5
2010
2011
29 29 302012 30 27 29 22 29 3724
6
2010
2011
22 24 272012 * 23 23 23 * 20 23 14619
3-6
2010
2011
0 83 63 32,2282012 1 4895 134 1 26 14683
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-6
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_read_2_num_not_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 11
1. Understanding Across Genres (GR 3-5)1. Understanding/Analysis Across Genres (GR 6-8)
2. Understanding/Analysisof Literary Texts
3. Understanding/Analysisof Informational Texts
YearGrade
REPORTING CATEGORY
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): READING
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY
STAAR Read (4)
2012 49.0 41.1 45.2
2010
3 2011
2012 46.5 47.0 41.2
2010
4 2011
2012 53.5 50.6 61.4
2010
5 2011
2012 66.5 57.8 58.9
2010
6 2011
2012 53.9 49.3 51.7
2010
3-6 2011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_read_4_obj 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 12
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): WRITING
AVERAGE NUMBER (#) OF ITEMS CORRECT
STAAR Writing (2)
18 21 242012 * 21 16 19 15 19 4616
4
2010
2011
0 31 15 7,0362012 1 1825 45 0 16 4630
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 4
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_write_2_num_not_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 13
1. Composition¹GR 4: Expository
GR 7: Personal Narrative
1. Composition¹GR 4: Personal Narrative
GR 7: Expository2. Revision 3. EditingYearGrade
REPORTING CATEGORY
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): WRITING
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY
STAAR Writing (4)
3.02012 3.0 43.2 47.6
2010
4 2011
¹Average score points (range 0-8). A STAAR composition is rated tw ice on a scale of 1 to 4, and the ratings are summed to determine score points for the composition. Score point scale: 0=Nonscorable; 2=Very Limited; 3=between Very Limited and Basic; 4=Basic; 5=betw een Basic and Satisfactory; 6=Satisfactory; 7=betw een Satisfactory and Accomplished; 8=Accomplished
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_write_4_obj 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 14
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS
PERCENTAGE MEETING TAKS PASSING STANDARD
STAAR Math (1)
70.8 81.8 77.02012 74.1 78.9 73.8 * 76.9 76.1 4671.4
3
2010
2011
65.6 73.3 79.52012 * 72.0 63.2 67.4 * 52.9 68.1 4754.8
4
2010
2011
50.0 71.4 76.22012 57.1 65.0 56.8 * 61.5 61.0 4148.0
5
2010
2011
66.7 76.9 73.32012 77.3 60.0 70.6 50.0 70.3 3741.2
6
2010
2011
64.0 76.1 76.62012 * 70.5 67.1 67.3 * 60.8 69.0 17156.5
3-6
2010
2011
0 100 71 45,2602012 1 7395 159 3 51 171108
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-6
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_math_1_per_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 15
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS
AVERAGE NUMBER (#) OF ITEMS CORRECT
STAAR Math (2)
24 26 272012 24 26 25 * 27 25 4623
3
2010
2011
24 27 282012 * 25 24 25 * 22 25 4722
4
2010
2011
26 26 302012 25 27 26 * 26 26 4123
5
2010
2011
24 24 272012 25 24 25 20 24 3719
6
2010
2011
24 26 282012 * 25 25 25 * 24 25 17122
3-6
2010
2011
0 100 71 45,2602012 1 7395 159 3 51 171108
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-6
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_math_2_num_not_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 16
1. Numbers, Operations,and Quantitative
Reasoning
2. Patterns,Relationships, and
Algebraic Reasoning
3. Geometry andSpatial Reasoning
4. Measurement5. Probability and
StatisticsYearGrade
REPORTING CATEGORY
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): MATHEMATICS
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY
STAAR Math (4)
2012 56.4 50.3 63.8 53.3 43.8
2010
3 2011
2012 54.1 53.2 51.1 46.8 48.5
2010
4 2011
2012 54.5 49.2 51.2 43.0 56.1
2010
5 2011
2012 44.9 51.6 47.6 41.9 47.6
2010
6 2011
2012 52.8 51.1 53.8 46.6 48.9
2010
3-6 2011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_math_4_obj 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 17
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): SCIENCE
AVERAGE NUMBER (#) OF ITEMS CORRECT
STAAR Science (2)
28 28 302012 29 26 28 * 25 28 4225
5
2010
2011
0 21 21 10,6972012 0 2022 38 1 13 4225
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 5
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_sc_2_num_not_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 18
1. Matter and Energy2. Force, Motion,
and Energy3. Earth and Space
4. Organisms andEnvironments
YearGrade
REPORTING CATEGORY
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (English): SCIENCE
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY
STAAR Science (4)
2012 73.2 68.6 62.1 55.1
2010
5 2011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_E_sc_4_obj 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 19
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING
PERCENTAGE MEETING TAKS PASSING STANDARD
STAAR (SP) Read (1)
71.4 * 88.72012 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 1080.0
3
2010
2011
71.4 * 84.22012 77.8 77.8 77.8 77.8 977.8
4
2010
2011
* * 77.42012 * * * * 4*
5
2010
2011
73.3 87.5 84.32012 78.3 78.3 78.3 78.3 2378.3
3-6
2010
2011
0 15 8 14,1012012 0 230 23 0 23 2323
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-6
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_S_read_1_per_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 20
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING
AVERAGE NUMBER (#) OF ITEMS CORRECT
STAAR (SP) Read (2)
16 * 232012 18 18 18 18 1018
3
2010
2011
22 * 262012 24 24 24 24 924
4
2010
2011
* * 282012 * * * * 4*
5
2010
2011
20 25 252012 21 21 21 21 2321
3-6
2010
2011
0 15 8 14,1012012 0 230 23 0 23 2323
02010
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-6
02011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_S_read_2_num_not_meet 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 21
1. Understanding Across Genres (GR 3-5)1. Understanding/Analysis Across Genres (GR 6-8)
2. Understanding/Analysisof Literary Texts
3. Understanding/Analysisof Informational Texts
YearGrade
REPORTING CATEGORY
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3-8 (Spanish): READING
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY REPORTING CATEGORY
STAAR (SP) Read (4)
2012 56.7 47.8 34.4
2010
3 2011
2012 46.7 58.0 53.5
2010
4 2011
2012 * * *
2010
5 2011
2012 52.0 54.0 45.1
2010
3-6 2011
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_STAAR38_S_read_4_obj 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 22
Number Tested(All Students)
Number Tested(All Students)
DistrictAt Risk Not At Risk All DistrictYearGrade At Risk Not At Risk All
State Compensatory Education (SCE) Compliance for At-Risk StudentsCompliance
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE on the ITBS
YearGrade
MATHEMATICS TOTAL (**MATHEMATICS )READING TOTAL (**READING PROFILE TOTAL )
2010
K**
55.1 5662.22012 * 69.4 67.6 37 57.9 48.6 51.8
51.2
56.8
50
48
61.257.1 85.7 80.0 35 41.2 63.6 56.0
63.32011 61.1 64.3 62.5 32 42.4 60.0 47.9
2010
K**
2012
2011
2010
1
50.7 5555.42012 42.9 39.4 40.0 40 34.8 37.5 36.4
48.8
53.1
51
58
55.250.0 75.0 55.6 36 57.5 63.6 58.8
58.12011 8.0 81.3 36.6 41 37.5 72.2 48.3
2010
1
2012
2011
2010
2
57.9 5649.82012 15.0 64.7 37.8 37 42.1 50.0 44.6
54.6
56.8
55
45
48.628.6 41.7 32.5 40 53.5 75.0 58.2
50.62011 6.7 * 14.7 34 22.0 * 24.4
2010
2
2012
2011
2010
5
43.8 4037.22012 19.4 66.7 30.0 40 15.6 50.0 22.5
44.8
0
42
0
36.22011 24.0 41.2 31.0 42 32.0 64.7 45.2
2010
5
2012
2011
2010
1-5
52.2 20746.32012 20.7 50.8 35.9 117 35.7 45.3 40.1
51.5
53.3
156
193
51.939.3 55.0 43.4 76 53.0 66.1 57.7
47.22011 12.5 62.2 28.2 117 33.1 64.8 42.0
2010
K-5
2012
2011
30,8072012 59 95 154 51,521112 95 207
20,2522010 63 48 111
29,7402011 98 51 149
40,163100 56 156
51,019139 54 193NumberTested
2012
2010
2011NumberTested
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_SCE_COMPLIANCE 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 23
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: READING TOTAL (**READING PROFILE TOTAL)ITBS Read (1)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
66.7 69.2
76.0 90.0
41.7 75.0
62.22012 63.3 85.7 69.4 * 67.6 37*
K**
61.22010 87.5 63.6 78.1 * * 80.0 3557.1
63.32011 58.3 75.0 61.3 * * 62.5 3261.1
46.7 36.0
41.2 68.4
30.8 46.7
55.42012 40.6 37.5 40.0 * 40.0 4042.9
1
55.22010 58.1 * 57.6 * * 55.6 3650.0
58.12011 38.7 30.0 33.3 * * 36.6 418.0
36.8 38.9
33.3 31.3
15.8 13.3
49.82012 34.6 45.5 34.3 * * 37.8 3715.0
2
48.62010 40.0 10.0 30.3 * * 32.5 4028.6
50.62011 14.8 14.3 12.9 * * 14.7 346.7
41.2 37.2
36.6 51.4
24.4 30.0
52.72012 37.9 42.1 37.3 * * 39.0 7722.2
1-2
51.92010 49.2 20.0 43.9 * 0.0 43.4 7639.3
54.42011 27.6 23.5 23.9 28.6 0.0 26.7 757.3
40.0 20.0
42.1 21.7
37.22012 33.3 23.1 25.7 0.0 12.5 30.0 4019.4
5
2010 0
36.22011 30.4 33.3 31.0 * 25.0 31.0 4224.0
40.7 31.7
36.6 51.4
29.7 26.4
46.32012 36.5 34.4 33.6 10.0 23.1 35.9 11720.7
1-5
51.92010 49.2 20.0 43.9 * 0.0 43.4 7639.3
47.22011 28.4 28.6 26.6 18.2 16.7 28.2 11712.5
0 54 63
0 41 35
0 64 53
23,8682012 0 3285 110 10 13 11758
13,9902010 0 1561 66 3 6 7656NumberTested
22,9792011 0 3581 109 11 18 11780
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ITBS_read_1_perGE40 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 24
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: READING TOTAL (**READING PROFILE TOTAL)ITBS Read (2)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
8 5
13 7
3 10
2,0272012 10 3 13 * 13 37*
K**
1,7172010 15 5 17 * * 20 352
2,1062011 9 4 12 * * 13 326
3 3
4 6
4 1
1,9632012 6 0 6 * 6 400
1
1,7292010 9 * 10 * * 10 366
1,9632011 3 2 3 * * 5 410
1 1
1 2
0 0
1,0172012 0 2 2 * * 2 370
2
9542010 3 0 2 * * 3 401
1,0182011 0 0 0 * * 0 340
4 4
5 8
4 1
2,9812012 6 2 8 * * 8 770
1-2
2,6832010 12 1 12 * 0 13 767
2,9812011 3 2 3 0 0 5 750
1 0
0 0
8222012 0 1 1 0 0 1 400
5
2010 0
7012011 0 0 0 * 0 0 420
5 4
5 8
4 1
3,8032012 6 3 9 0 0 9 1170
1-5
2,6832010 12 1 12 * 0 13 767
3,6922011 3 2 3 0 0 5 1170
0 54 63
0 41 35
0 64 53
23,8682012 0 3285 110 10 13 11758
13,9902010 0 1561 66 3 6 7656NumberTested
22,9792011 0 3581 109 11 18 11780
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ITBS_read_2_nGE80 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 25
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS TOTAL (**MATHEMATICS)ITBS Math (1)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
50.0 53.8
60.6 47.1
36.0 60.9
55.12012 40.0 65.4 52.7 * 61.1 51.8 5657.9
K**
51.22010 66.7 46.2 54.3 * 36.4 56.0 5041.2
56.82011 45.8 50.0 48.9 * 50.0 47.9 4842.4
44.0 30.0
55.6 62.5
48.6 47.8
50.72012 35.5 37.5 36.4 * 38.9 36.4 5534.8
1
48.82010 53.1 68.4 60.4 * 69.2 58.8 5157.5
53.12011 37.5 64.0 47.2 * 52.6 48.3 5837.5
58.6 29.6
54.3 65.0
20.0 30.0
57.92012 37.9 51.9 43.4 * 36.8 44.6 5642.1
2
54.62010 73.3 40.0 58.3 * 40.0 58.2 5553.5
56.82011 11.1 44.4 26.2 * 40.0 24.4 4522.0
51.2 37.3
56.8 59.0
36.5 47.0
54.52012 37.8 51.9 44.2 20.0 45.5 44.3 16743.8
K-2
51.52010 64.0 50.0 57.7 12.5 47.7 57.7 15653.0
55.62011 31.3 53.7 41.5 8.3 48.1 41.1 15133.3
30.0 15.0
52.6 39.1
43.82012 24.0 20.0 22.9 * 0.0 22.5 4015.6
5
2010 0
44.82011 41.7 52.9 45.2 * 45.5 45.2 4232.0
47.1 33.0
56.8 59.0
39.4 44.9
52.22012 34.8 46.7 40.4 13.3 38.5 40.1 20735.7
K-5
51.52010 64.0 50.0 57.7 12.5 47.7 57.7 15653.0
53.32011 33.6 53.6 42.4 12.5 47.6 42.0 19333.1
0 104 103
0 95 61
0 104 89
51,5212012 0 92115 198 15 65 207112
40,1632010 0 7086 142 8 44 156100NumberTested
51,0192011 0 84107 184 16 63 193139
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ITBS_math_1_perGE40 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 26
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS TOTAL (**MATHEMATICS)ITBS Math (2)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
4 4
4 3
2 10
2,4722012 4 4 8 * 0 8 560
K**
2,3582010 4 3 7 * 0 7 500
2,8152011 5 7 12 * 4 12 488
2 1
3 5
7 1
2,4732012 2 1 3 * 1 3 551
1
2,2662010 5 3 8 * 2 8 516
2,7162011 5 3 8 * 1 8 584
3 2
2 5
4 0
2,8432012 2 3 5 * 1 5 562
2
2,4842010 6 1 5 * 1 7 553
2,7462011 1 3 4 * 2 4 453
9 7
9 13
13 11
7,7882012 8 8 16 1 2 16 1673
K-2
7,1082010 15 7 20 0 3 22 1569
8,2772011 11 13 24 1 7 24 15115
2 0
3 4
1,4262012 1 1 2 * 0 2 401
5
2010 0
1,3952011 2 5 7 * 3 7 423
11 7
9 13
16 15
9,2142012 9 9 18 1 2 18 2074
K-5
7,1082010 15 7 20 0 3 22 1569
9,6962011 13 18 31 1 10 31 19318
0 104 103
0 95 61
0 104 89
51,5212012 0 92115 198 15 65 207112
40,1632010 0 7086 142 8 44 156100NumberTested
51,0192011 0 84107 184 16 63 193139
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ITBS_math_2_nGE80 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 27
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS COMPUTATIONITBS Math (3)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
60.0 36.7
56.0 58.3
51.4 45.5
62.52012 45.2 50.0 47.3 * 55.6 47.3 5547.8
1
63.52010 51.6 66.7 60.9 * 66.7 57.1 4952.6
66.72011 48.4 52.0 48.1 * 36.8 49.1 5740.0
65.5 40.7
54.3 55.0
28.0 25.0
63.62012 41.4 66.7 52.8 * 57.9 53.6 5652.6
2
61.42010 53.3 56.0 54.2 * 65.0 54.5 5555.8
62.02011 18.5 38.9 23.8 * 26.7 26.7 4524.4
63.0 38.6
55.0 56.8
41.7 35.7
63.02012 43.3 58.8 50.0 * 56.8 50.5 11150.8
1-2
62.52010 52.5 60.5 57.4 * 65.6 55.8 10454.3
64.42011 34.5 46.5 37.2 14.3 32.4 39.2 10232.1
50.0 52.4
78.9 82.6
45.92012 53.8 46.7 55.6 0.0 30.0 51.2 4148.5
5
2010 0
48.62011 83.3 76.5 81.0 * 63.6 81.0 4272.0
59.5 42.3
55.0 56.8
50.6 52.3
57.82012 46.5 56.1 51.4 18.2 51.1 50.7 15250.0
1-5
62.52010 52.5 60.5 57.4 * 65.6 55.8 10454.3
59.72011 48.8 55.0 50.7 36.4 40.0 51.4 14441.5
0 74 78
0 60 44
0 79 65
38,6502012 0 6686 144 11 47 15294
26,9372010 0 4361 94 3 32 10481NumberTested
38,1762011 0 6082 136 11 45 144106
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ITBS_math_3_perGE40 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 28
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS COMPUTATIONITBS Math (4)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
7 6
3 7
7 3
4,0602012 8 5 13 * 4 13 554
1
4,1292010 5 5 10 * 4 10 496
4,4272011 4 6 10 * 3 10 577
8 4
8 1
1 1
3,8202012 7 5 11 * 2 12 566
2
3,7762010 3 6 8 * 6 9 558
3,8102011 0 2 2 * 1 2 451
15 10
11 8
8 4
7,8802012 15 10 24 * 6 25 11110
1-2
7,9052010 8 11 18 * 10 19 10414
8,2372011 4 8 12 0 4 12 1028
4 3
6 6
1,1692012 4 3 6 0 0 7 415
5
2010 0
1,4162011 5 7 12 * 5 12 426
19 13
11 8
14 10
9,0492012 19 13 30 2 6 32 15215
1-5
7,9052010 8 11 18 * 10 19 10414
9,6602011 9 15 24 1 9 24 14414
0 74 78
0 60 44
0 79 65
38,6502012 0 6686 144 11 47 15294
26,9372010 0 4361 94 3 32 10481NumberTested
38,1762011 0 6082 136 11 45 144106
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_ITBS_math_4_nGE80 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 29
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Logramos: READING TOTALLOG Read (1)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
100.0 92.3
87.5 100.0
76.9 *
89.92012 94.7 94.7 94.4 94.7 1994.4
K
89.32010 93.3 92.9 100.0 93.3 15100.0
90.92011 81.3 81.3 * 86.7 81.3 1680.0
77.8 83.3
87.5 *
70.0 100.0
89.22012 80.0 80.0 * 80.0 80.0 1580.0
1
89.12010 92.3 92.3 100.0 92.3 13100.0
89.42011 87.5 81.3 82.4 82.4 1781.3
87.5 100.0
90.9 *
66.7 *
93.32012 93.3 92.9 93.3 93.3 1593.3
2
93.82010 86.7 86.7 86.7 86.7 1586.7
94.92011 72.7 72.7 72.7 72.7 1172.7
87.0 92.3
88.9 93.8
72.4 93.3
90.82012 89.8 89.6 * 89.6 89.8 4989.6
K-2
90.72010 90.7 90.5 94.3 90.7 4394.3
91.72011 81.4 79.1 * 81.4 79.5 4478.6
0 23 26
0 27 16
0 29 15
21,1502012 0 490 48 1 48 4948
19,0412010 0 430 42 0 35 4335NumberTested
21,1412011 0 430 43 2 43 4442
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_LOG_read_1_perGE40 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 30
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Logramos: READING TOTALLOG Read (2)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
2 7
5 5
7 *
3,6792012 9 9 9 9 199
K
3,5232010 10 9 6 10 156
3,9642011 10 10 * 10 10 169
1 0
3 *
4 2
2,4372012 1 1 * 1 1 151
1
2,5292010 6 6 6 6 136
2,4592011 6 5 6 6 176
4 4
4 *
2 *
2,9342012 8 7 8 8 158
2
3,0402010 5 5 5 5 155
3,2272011 6 6 6 6 116
7 11
12 9
13 9
9,0502012 18 17 * 18 18 4918
K-2
9,0922010 21 20 17 21 4317
9,6502011 22 21 * 22 22 4421
0 23 26
0 27 16
0 29 15
21,1502012 0 490 48 1 48 4948
19,0412010 0 430 42 0 35 4335NumberTested
21,1412011 0 430 43 2 43 4442
filler
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) rpt_LOG_read_2_nGE80 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 31
PercentageImprovedin 2012
PercentageImprovedin 2012
PercentageImprovedin 2012
PercentageImprovedin 2012
Level 1 in 2011 Level 2 in 2011 Level 3 in 2011 Levels 1-3 in 2011
NumberTested
Both Years
NumberTested
Both Years
GradeNumberTested
Both Years
NumberTested
Both Years
Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING IMPROVEMENT
WMLS
06 2 0.0 - 0 - 2 0.0
0ALL 2 0.0 - 0 - 2 0.0
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Account ability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Ser vices) rpt_W MLS 2012-13 Campus Data Packet
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 32
Listening
N (%) Progressed
Number RatedBoth Years
2011 Level
PERFORMANCE IN 2012 PROGRESSION FROM2011 TO 2012
Speaking Writing
% % % %
Grade(2010-11)
N N N N(N Rated) 2012 Level N %
CompositeReading
2012 Level
Domain:
IntBeg Adv AdvHigh
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment Syste mTELPAS
5.3
KN
1 5.3 1 5 26.3 5
(19)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
26.3 26.35
10.52 10.5 2 3 15.8 2 10.5 10.52
26.32 10.5 5 5 26.3 5 26.3 26.35
57.914 73.7 11 6 31.6 7 36.8 36.87
–
–
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
–
––
–
–
–
–
–
–
11.8
1
1 5.9 2 7 41.2 3
(17)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
17.6 17.63
52.95 29.4 9 7 41.2 4 23.5 23.54
17.66 35.3 3 1 5.9 3 17.6 23.54
17.65 29.4 3 2 11.8 7 41.2 35.36
15
8 (53.3%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
2
30
2
1
0
1
2
4
11.1
2
1 5.6 2 2 11.1 1
(18)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
5.6 5.61
22.23 16.7 4 10 55.6 7 38.9 38.97
44.48 44.4 8 4 22.2 7 38.9 38.97
22.26 33.3 4 2 11.1 3 16.7 16.73
17
7 (41.2%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
1
43
0
0
1
0
5
3
28.6
3
1 7.1 4 3 21.4 3
(14)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
21.4 21.43
14.31 7.1 2 10 71.4 2 14.3 14.32
50.011 78.6 7 1 7.1 7 50.0 57.18
7.11 7.1 1 0 0.0 2 14.3 7.11
13
3 (23.1%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
3
20
0
0
3
0
5
0
18.8
4
3 18.8 3 2 12.5 3
(16)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
18.8 18.83
75.09 56.3 12 12 75.0 5 31.3 37.56
6.34 25.0 1 1 6.3 7 43.8 43.87
0.00 0.0 0 1 6.3 1 6.3 0.00
16
2 (12.5%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
3
60
0
0
2
0
5
0
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Account ability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Ser vices) rpt_TELPAS 2012-13 Campus Data Packe t
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 33
Listening
N (%) Progressed
Number RatedBoth Years
2011 Level
PERFORMANCE IN 2012 PROGRESSION FROM2011 TO 2012
Speaking Writing
% % % %
Grade(2010-11)
N N N N(N Rated) 2012 Level N %
CompositeReading
2012 Level
Domain:
IntBeg Adv AdvHigh
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment Syste mTELPAS
7.7
5
1 7.7 1 1 7.7 0
(13)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
0.0 0.00
30.84 30.8 4 6 46.2 3 23.1 23.13
15.42 15.4 2 3 23.1 5 38.5 46.26
46.26 46.2 6 3 23.1 5 38.5 30.84
12
6 (50.0%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
0
21
0
0
2
1
4
2
33.3
6
3 33.3 3 5 55.6 1
(9)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
12.5 12.51
22.22 22.2 2 0 0.0 2 25.0 25.02
33.33 33.3 3 3 33.3 4 50.0 50.04
11.11 11.1 1 1 11.1 1 12.5 12.51
6
1 (16.7%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
1
10
0
0
0
0
3
1
15.1
ALL
11 10.4 16 25 23.6 16
(106)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
15.2 15.216
33.026 24.5 35 48 45.3 25 23.8 24.826
27.436 34.0 29 18 17.0 38 36.2 39.041
24.533 31.1 26 15 14.2 26 24.8 21.022
79
27 (34.2%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
10
184
2
1
8
2
24
10
Indicates students w ho progressed at least one level f rom 2011 to 2012.
August 24, 2012 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Account ability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Ser vices) rpt_TELPAS 2012-13 Campus Data Packe t
JOHN W. CARPENTER (121) 34