data quality – destinations of leavers from higher education fiona sandford lucy burrows
TRANSCRIPT
Data Quality – Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education
Fiona SandfordLucy Burrows
Destinations of Graduates: key facts
We have to achieve a response rate of: 80% for UK-domiciled full time 50% for all other EU students 80% for Research Council funded students
We are not required (yet) to follow up non-EU graduates (but we do!)
Two collection periods – January and April First by email ~ 40% response – then telephone
Quiz 1The highest salaries last year were £500,000 and £270,000. Which courses? What are they doing?
£500,000 MSc Human Rights £270,000 BSc International Relations
Advising Hedge Funds on emerging markets Catwalk and Campaign Model (who deferred her
job offer from I-Bank for a year)
Destinations of Graduates: league tables
Based only on UK first degree leavers – 592 graduates
Graduate prospects = (n graduates in ‘graduate level work + n graduates in full time study/total replies)
So ‘graduate level’ work is critical.
Coding Quiz Trader for Madison Tyler
Assistant to Chief Executive Civitas
Sales trainee Ondra
a. Market traderb. Share dealerc. Financial Analyst
a. Personal Assistantb. Executive Assistantc. Otherd. (Social Science Researcher)
e. Sales related occupationf. Otherg. (Financial Analyst)
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”
Prince Gautama Siddharta, the founder of Buddhism, 563-483 B.C.
Our data checks Timescales
Set in stone,~6 months after they graduate with a defined date ‘what were you doing on…’
Method All responses checked for inconsistencies, logged to monitor response
rates. Running checks on n responses per course, and unemployment status. All those reporting unemployed are followed up by a careers adviser
Coding and Inputting All coding done by careers advisers, for their departments. Coding
seminars run regularly (ish) Returning data to HESA
Amending / checking contradictory details
Standard methodology for data generation Good collaborative effort across the School
Standard checking criteria/documentary guidance
Pretty sound
Checks by senior staff 8/10
Single point of failure x Too reliant on one person
Sufficient statistical training Full use of LSE Excel training
Good clarification of responsibility of data providers and users ? Room for improvement
Data treated as part of standard management information
yes
Sufficient appreciation of “political” dimension of data ? Needs constant reinforcing
• Good data costs
DLHE = 51MSLs for a Band 6 + ~ £6500 for student callers + 47 * 2.5 hours evening shifts of supervision by
members of team. + hours of coding by Careers Advisers (band 7) + hours of time from ARD
• Three most important things
All staff understand the importance of the ‘political’ nature of the data
Common sense! Data quality relies on good base data (and, for us,
good contact information)
Finally..
DLHE return only as good as SITS data We rely (heavily) on accurate contact information
using LFY and Advance – any help from departments MOST gratefully received!
LSE post graduate internship scheme helped last year to get unemployment under 7% (beating Imperial for the first time)
Please take more interns next year!!