data sharing within the ccs community – an overview
DESCRIPTION
The Groundwater and Storage interactions project arose out of a meeting on the shoulder of the Greenhouse Gas Technologies Conference in Amsterdam in 2010. It was decided to concentrate initially on the Australian Flagships projects. On 3 May 2011 Australian researchers and government agencies met and presented their work to date.In these slides Mark Webster, Divisional Information Officer, Petroleum and Marine Division,Geoscience Australia, provides an overview on data sharing within the CCS communityTRANSCRIPT
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Data Sharing within the CCS community – An overview
Mark WebsterDivisional Information Officer
Petroleum and Marine DivisionGeoscience Australia
May 2011
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
What I will be discussing today:
• What the CCS community would like to achieve
• Current situation
• Overview of approach PMD has taken
• Geoscience Australia examples
• The next steps ahead
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
What we would like to achieve?A consolidated and collaborative approach to data and information within the CCS
community.
CO2CRC
International Australian
Participation
Onshore State Initiatives
IndustryOffshore CCS
CS Taskforce
GovernmentCommunity
A systematic approach to manage any resource conflict between CCS and for example hydrocarbons oil and gas, geothermal and
groundwater.
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
What we would like to achieve?
The point of truth would be corrected if an error is found for everyone that follows
You can combine various kind of data, stored at different places and in different formats and visualise them in your web browser or internal software tools.You can even QUERY them the same way and download the part you want!
Increasing need for richer content, personalised tools and better filtering
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Data Structures
Proprietary Software
Versions of Software
Client
Current Situation (1)…data access is not standardised across organisations
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Monitoring
Capture
Storage
Current Situation (2)…the science work flow is not understood across organisations
Transportradio waves
receiver wherewaves are collected
wavesconverted intoelectro signals
computerreceived as signal
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Current Situation - Data Discovery
I need reservoir seal integrity data. Who has it and how can I access it?
?
?
?
?
?
Over here!!!
The constant need to consume data and reduce costs
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
You have to keep and maintain versions of someone else’s data, and you don’t know if it’s correct or outdated?
You know there’s useful information out there, but you cannot find it?
You waste valuable time downloading and converting datasets? – with an assumption on its history, quality and what the data really means.
You can see the data you want on a web map but you can’t download the real data for analysis?
We downsize our science to match what we can handle – which is increasingly not what we need
Plus a constant need to connect ‘my tools to your content’
Current Situation – Side Effects
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Overview of the approach PMD has taken
• It’s about communication and a willingness for change – Not an IT issue• Analyse scientific workflow first!• Define data requirements• Analyse dataset attributes• Identify areas of change
• Recognise leading agency • Implement new system
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Geoscience Australia Example
• In collaboration with the CO2CRC• Define a national systematic approach in the way CCS data is stored, discovered and delivered
What we learnt:• The CCS community is reliant on other science industries to supply and support the data needed to deliver CCS outcomes i.e. Petroleum, Geothermal & groundwater
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Basin screening/Definition of Project Area
Data Gathering and preparation - wells and seismic
Seismic Interpretation Well Correlation Facies analysis Petrophysics
Structural Framework MappingHydrodynamics
Static Geological Model
Dynamic ModellingLong term Dynamic Modelling
Short Term
Facies Mapping
IDEALISED CCS PROJECT WORK FLOW
Integrated Site ReportEconomics
Geomechanical Analysis
Monitoring
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Basin screening/Definition of Project Area
Data Gathering and preparation - wells and seismic
Seismic Interpretation Well Correlation Facies analysis Petrophysics
Structural Framework MappingHydrodynamics
Static Geological Model
Dynamic ModellingLong term Dynamic Modelling
Short Term
Facies Mapping
Integrated Site ReportEconomics
Geomechanical Analysis
Monitoring
Wells header, permits, basins, topographic, fields data etc
Petroleum, geological, geothermal, groundwater etcIDEALISED CCS PROJECT WORK FLOW
Well logs, seal & temperature, basins etc
Wells cores, 2D & 3D Seismic, geological etc
Well cores, lithology, porosity, permeability etc
Well logs, well cores, lithology etc
Temperature, well logs, Samples etc
Seismic, structural elements, formations etc
Samples, reservoir thickness, hydrogeology etc
Temperature, geothermal gradient, pressure etc
Biostratigraphy, well logs, seal integrity etc
Titles, coal reserves, fields, bibliographical etc
Reservoir & fractural pressure, 2D & 3D seismic etc
Fields, pipelines, bibliographical, infrastructure etcEmission & monitoring sites, water sampling etc
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
• Associated attributes (spatial and a-spatial)
• Output purpose
• Applications used
• Database/system retrieved
• Data location/s (including primary and other)
• How was the data retrieved?
• Data size
• Primary data owner
• Data standards used (if any)
• Comments
• Strategies for change
Additionally we analysed:MICP analysis, sonic, seam gas
Modelling & Mapping, monitoring, analysis
ArcGIS, GoCAD, Mpath
NAS, WCR, OzTherm
CSIRO, RET, States
Manual data entry, downloaded, Unknown
<100Mb, ~1TB
GA, CSIRO, CO2CRC
Nil, ISO19115, PPDM
Paid for the data, IP attached to data delivery
Web services required, define data steward
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
What we end up with:
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Added bonuses that could benefit:
• Strategy Map for CCS(A start at least)
• Scenario modelling• Workflow• Workforce• Clients• Technology• Data
• Initial tactical changes to business workflows
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
So what was the outcome? (1)
• By defining the science workflow first we now have a good basis in knowing how, what and why the data should be discovered and delivered
• Dispersed group of agencies will need to maintain their own primary data
• The CCS community is reliant on the Petroleum, geothermal & groundwater disciplines to supply and maintain the data needed to deliver CCS outcomes
• One system to store, manage and deliver data is not the solution – A distributed system is required
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
So what was the outcome? (2)
• Not all agencies have the infrastructure to support their own needs, let alone at a national scale
• There will be a requirement for more involvement (in the long run) from the scientific community rather than IT professionals
• Phased approach - Discoverability is key to the first phase
• A data standards approach is required
• A lead agency is required to support the CCS community at a national scale
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Technical Proposal
Met
adat
a C
atal
ogue
Web
Ser
vice
Lay
er
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
The next steps ahead
Geoscience Australia has a new strategy in place to ensure the discoverability and delivery of all its data, no matter what the discipline. With this, GA will continue its role:
• As the national agency to support the CCS community at a national scale with regard to data discovery and delivery.
And
• To deliver (where possible) as much scientific data to the industry and communities i.e. petroleum, groundwater, geothermal etc• To support the communities with data standards and principles for data discoverability
Mark Webster, Geoscience Australia May 2011
Thankyou
Questions?