date: 19.7 - welcome to environmentenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/online/eds/21...strain...
TRANSCRIPT
Date: 19.7.2017 To, The Director, Infrastructure and Miscellaneous Projects & CRZ Indira Paryavaran Bhavan Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi - 110 003
Sub: Reply to Additional details sought in respect of Environmental Clearance Expansion of “RUMAH BALI” Amalgamated with GB ONE At S. No. 98 H. No.1A, 3, S. No. 100/11/1, 100/11/2 H. No. 12A, 12 B, 14A, 14B, 15 A, 15 B, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 N.S.No.101 H.NO.5, S.No.109/30/3, at village Bhayanderpada, Ghodbunder Road, Thane (W) (IA/MH/NCP/60110/2016; F. No. 21-67/2016-IA-III)
Ref: Minutes of 12th EAC (Infra-II) meeting held on 28.12.2016 (Item no. 12.4.8) (IA/MH/NCP/60110/2016; F. No. 21-67/2016-IA-III) Respected Sir, We are very much thankful to Expert Appraisal Committee (Infra-2) for appraising our above referred project in its 12th Meeting held on 28.12.2016 (Item no. 12.4.8)
As per the minutes of the meeting, we were asked to comply with certain points raised by committee.
The point wise reply to the queries raised is enclosed herewith. We hope that reply is in line with your requirement.
Thanking you, Yours faithfully, FOR, PURANIK BUILDERS PVT. LTD. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY Enclosures: 1. As above
Sr. No.
Point raised by 12th EAC Reply
1 Certified compliance report issued by the Regional Office, Nagpur for environmental conditions stipulated in the existing EC.
Certified report is attached as Enclosure 1. Submission of Post Monitoring Report has been done periodically.
2 Importance and benefits of the project
• The study reveals that the proposed location for the project does not involve any kind of replacement of communities. • The proposed project site is located in residential zone of TMC with a very good connectivity by road. The area comes under phase IV of TMC for the infrastructure development. • Phase IV of TMC has come with new commercial and IT park projects which is generating immense employment as on today and in coming years • Due to the proposed project activity, influx of population may increase during the construction phase. This may lead to strain on infrastructure facilities in the area as well as increase in population at local level. However, this impact is only for the short duration and temporary in nature. This will help in reducing the population density of Main City to some extent. • During the construction phase, labors shall be employed and in operation phase gardeners, mechanics ,security guards and home maid will be employed from nearby areas
3 Pl. clarify, whether project proposal attracts the provisions of CRZ, Notification, 2011
Not Applicable. DP has been submitted as supporting Document.
4 Present landuse of the proposed project site.
As per DP remark project site is under Residential zone. Zone Certificate received from Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) is attached as Enclosure 2.
5 Copy of building sanction plan as well as approval of high rise building committee of Maharashtra.
Permission from Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) dated 27.1.2017 is attached Enclosure 3. Approval of high rise building committee is not applicable for projects under jurisdiction of Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC)
6 Details of no. of floor along with built-up area to be constructed in each block to be furnished.
Details of no. of floor along with built-up area to be constructed in each block is given below:
Building
Configuration
FSI Area
(Sq. m)
Non FSI Area
(Sq. m)
Total BUA
(Sq. m)
No. of Teneme
nts A1 ST + 29 7774.9
15 3826.88
7 11601.
802 111
A2 ST + 29 7774.915
3826.887
11601.802
111
B1 LG +UG/P +ST/G/P +
7923.93
3595.33 11519.26
170
28 B2 LG +
UG1/1st P + UG2/2nd P +
G/P + 28
7716.04
3502.89 11218.93
170
B3 LG + 1st P + 2nd P + G/P
+ 28
9132.33
3840.33 12972.66
170
A3 LG + 1st P + 2nd P + G/P
+ 28
8782.86
4214.84 12997.7
136
A4 LG + 1st P + 2nd P + G/P
+ 28
8782.86
4214.84 12997.7
136
B1 to A4
0 37991.8 37991.8
0
Type C
B + G / Shop + 1
P/ Mezzanine
+ 2 P/Offices +
3 P / St + 25
25888.44
11326.57
37215.01
390
Type C
0 17372.2 17372.2
0
Bungalow
s
G + 1 770.55 0 770.55 6
Club Hous
e
0 258.08 258.08 0
Substation
0 130.75 130.75 0
Total 84546.84
94101.404
178648.244
1400
7 Layout plan indicating road, greenbelt, drainage, sewer line, STP, solid waste handling area, rain water harvesting structure, etc. in different color to be Furnished.
Co-ordinated drawing showing Layout plan indicating road, greenbelt, drainage, sewer line, STP, solid waste handling area, rain water harvesting structure etc. with different colour codes is attached as Enclosure 4.
8 Layout of parking plan indicating entry and exit points of vehicular movement as well as traffic management
The layout showing entry and exit points, driveways, parking slots, vehicular movement and fire tender movement is attached as Enclosure 5. We have provided parking as per the rules.
plan. Highlight the fire tender pathway
9 Details energy conservation measures to be taken. taken (all points mentioned in the proposal such as orientation to support reduced heat gain, use of ASHRAE 90.1, use of ECBC compliant envelope measures to be supported through drawings and details in the proposal
Complied and attached as Enclosure 6.
10 Details of source of water supply along with permission to be submitted.
Water Source will be available from Thane Municipal Corporation. Permission received from Thane Municipal Corporation on 13th Aug, 2016
11 Excess treated sewage disposal plan/scheme to be submitted
Excess treated water from our project will be disposed in Municipal sewer lines.
12 Prediction of ground level concentration from the stack of DG sets
Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants due to DG set of total 1090 KVA is attached as Enclosure 7.
13 Efforts shall be made to reduce capacity of DG set and remaining standby power shall be met from solar energy.
We have reexamined the calculation of DG set requirements. DG set requirement is calculated considering Fire Emergency Loads, Pump load, one lift for each wing, Sump pump, Ventilation load and Environment management facility like STP hence it is not possible to reduce the capacity of the DG set. Requirement of DG set is given below: Sr No Building DG Capacity in KVA
1 Building as per old EC
A1 1 NO. 320KVA A2
B1
B2 1 NO. 200KVA B3
2
Proposed Buildings_
A3
1 NO. 250KVA A4
Clubhouse
Type D
Type C Commercial
1 NO. 320KVA Type C Wing-1
Type C Wing-2
14 Treatment scheme for sewage and its recycling mode
Complied and attached as Enclosure 8.
15 Details of rain water harvesting system to be furnished. Clarity on recharge pits, storage systems for rain water and use of appropriate filtration system for collected rain water to be detailed.
Complied and attached as Enclosure 9.
16 Calculation on sizing of solar water heating systems to be furnished
Calculation for solar hot water system considered for existing buildings (A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, A3) is given below :
Buildings
No. of flats Hot water requirement in litres
No. of panels
Area for solar
panels (2.8 Sq.
m/panel) Sq. m
A1 111 11100 89 249.20 A2 111 11100 89 249.20 B1 170 17000 136 380.80 B2 170 17000 136 380.80 B3 170 17000 136 380.80 A3 136 13600 109 304.64
Power requirement achieved by solar hot water system: 162.12 KW Two solar powered lights and one solar powered fan is proposed in new buildings (A4, C1, C2, Bungalows). Calculation is given below: Number of flats: 532 Power requirement of 2 lights and 1 fan Connection: 53 KW Number of panels: 217
17 A backup arrangement of at least 50% solar powered systems connected to the grid and at least two solar powered lights and one solar powered fan in each flat
18 Management plan for excavation and dewatering to ensure compliance to the CGWA
There is 1 basement for Type C (Area: 5277.09m2) of the project. There is no basement proposed for remaining buildings. Excavation will be done for basement and foundation purpose. During the excavation activity for the project a sedimentation
guidelines and regulation.
tank will be provided on site to ensure sedimentation of the dewatered groundwater. Following measures will be taken in accordance to the CGWA guidelines during excavation and dewatering if the water table intersects with the excavation:
1. The dewatered quantum will first be settled in the sedimentation tank
2. The dewatered quantum will be utilized for dust suppression and/or for artificial recharge to groundwater.
19 Solid waste
management plan along with area earmarked for solid waste Management scheme.
Solid Waste generation from the complex is estimated to be 3747 kg/day. • Segregation of dry and wet garbage will be done at source. • Dry/recyclable waste (garbage) will be segregated and given to recyclers. • Wet garbage will be treated in Organic waste converter. Composting Unit (Organic waste converter) No. of unit SWM 3 no. Capacity 2174 kg/day Total Space provided 200 m2 The Solid waste management area earmarked is shown in Co-ordinated layout.
20 Management of excavated soil. Pollution control measures to be taken to control fugitive emission during construction phase including marble /stone cutting.
Complied: Activity Quantity Units
Excavation quantity 45241 Cu mtr
Quantity of waste to be used for refilling/ road/top soil
14680 to be used in filling
Cu. Mtr
Quantity to disposed off 30561 Cu. Mtr
Cut and fill management layout is attached. Fugitive emission during construction phase will be control by barricading & plantation along the plot boundary, water sprinkling at regular interval to arrest Air Bourne-dust, Use of Ready Mix concrete to avoid excessive movement of vehicles on the site. Use of PPE such as ear plugs and masks for labours will be made mandatory wherever there are excess emissions. Precut vitrified tiles will be used for flooring. Tile cutting will be done within the building and will be done using water so there will not be any considerable fugitive emission.
21 Layout plan indicating Greenbelt along with area earmarked to be provided
Layout plan indicating Greenbelt is attached as Enclosure 10. Total RG area required 10462.67 m2
Total RG area provided 10762.45 m2
i
TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY OF
EXISITING AND PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
BY
M/S PURANIK BUILDERS PVT. LTD
Prepared by
SAGE (Sustainable Approach for Green Environment) LLP
205, Bhavani Industrial Estate,
Hare Krishna Road, Opp. Main Gate of IIT Bombay,
Powai, Mumbai - 400076
Rumah Bali G.B.
One
ii
Contents
Contents ..................................................................................................................................... ii
List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... iv
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v
Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Study Background ............................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Scope of the Study ............................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Report Structure ................................................................................................................ 2
1.4 Design Parameters ............................................................................................................ 3
1.5 Entry/Exit Lane Capacity ................................................................................................. 4
Chapter 2 Project Background ............................................................................................... 5
2.1 Surrounding Road Network .............................................................................................. 6
Chapter 3 Site Appreciation, Existing Transport Network and Base Traffic .................... 8
3.1 Survey Locations .............................................................................................................. 8
3.2 Schedule of Surveys for Data Collection ......................................................................... 9
3.3 Road Inventory Survey ..................................................................................................... 9
3.3.1 Ghodbunder Road 9
Chapter 4 Traffic Data Analysis ........................................................................................... 11
4.1 Traffic Analysis .............................................................................................................. 11
4.2 Estimation of Capacity and LoS (for current scenario – 2016) ...................................... 13
Estimation of Capacity and LoS (after 10 years scenario-2021) .......................................... 14
4.3 Estimation of Capacity and LoS (after 20 years scenario-2031) .................................... 15
4.4 Estimation of Capacity and LoS (after 25 years scenario-2041) .................................... 16
4.5 Comparison for traffic impact due to proposed Development with current facility ...... 17
4.6 Mitigation Measures: ...................................................................................................... 18
Chapter 5 Parking Study Report .......................................................................................... 19
5.1 General Development Layout ......................................................................................... 19
5.1.1 Background 19
5.2 Development Layout ...................................................................................................... 19
iii
Chapter 6 Retrieval Analysis ................................................................................................. 26
6.1 Retrieval Time Calculation ............................................................................................. 27
Chapter 7 Swept Path Analysis ............................................................................................. 29
Chapter 8 Traffic Management Plan .................................................................................... 33
8.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 33
8.2 Purpose of Traffic Management Plans (TMP) ............................................................... 33
8.3 Basic Principles of Work Zones Traffic Management Plans WTMP ............................ 34
8.4 Planning of WTMP ......................................................................................................... 35
8.5 Traffic Calming .............................................................................................................. 36
8.6 Traffic Control Measures................................................................................................ 36
Chapter 9 Summary and Conclusion.................................................................................... 38
9.1 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 38
9.2 Concluding Remarks ...................................................................................................... 39
iv
List of Figures
Figure 2.1 Location of Proposed Plot (Rumah Bali) .................................................................. 5
Figure 2.2 Access Road Network ............................................................................................... 7
Figure 3.1 Locations for Data Collection (Survey Locations) ................................................... 8
Figure 3.2 Categories Wise Hourly Traffic Distribution for Ghodbunder Road........................ 9
Figure 3.3 Hourly Total PCU and Volume Distribution for Ghodbunder Road ...................... 10
Figure 3.4 Modal Split (vehicles) for Ghodbunder Road ......................................................... 10
Figure 4.1 Road access network ............................................................................................... 11
Figure 4.2 Effect by new development on Ghodbunder Road ................................................. 17
Figure 5.1 Parking Layout Plan for Upper Level 2 Floor ........................................................ 20
Figure 5.2 Parking Layout Plan for Upper Level 1 Floor Plan ................................................ 21
Figure 5.3 Parking Layout Plan for Lower Ground Level plan ................................................ 22
Figure 5.4 Parking Layout Plan for Basement Level for building Type C .............................. 23
Figure 5.5 Parking Layout Plan for Ground Level for building Type C .................................. 23
Figure 5.6 Parking Layout Plan for 2nd Podium Level for building Type C ........................... 24
Figure 5.7 Parking Layout Plan for 3rd Podium Level for building Type C ........................... 24
Figure 5.8 Parking Layout Plan for 4th Podium Level for building Type C ............................ 25
Figure 7.1 Detailed Design and Dimensions of Design Car Vehicle ....................................... 29
Figure 7.2 Detailed Design and Dimensions of Design Fire Engine Vehicle .......................... 30
Figure 7.3 Swept Path Analysis for Car ................................................................................... 31
Figure 7.4 Swept Path Analysis for Fire tender........................................................................ 32
Figure 8.1 Traffic Control Measures ........................................................................................ 37
v
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Description of LoS based on V/C Ratio ..................................................................... 3
Table 2.1 Building Configuration ............................................................................................... 6
Table 4.1 Estimation of LoS value for current scenario 2016 .................................................. 13
Table 4.2 Estimation of LoS value for morning peak hours for current year 2016 .................. 13
Table 4.3 Estimation of LoS value for evening peak hours for current year 2016 .................. 13
Table 4.4 Estimation of LoS value for year 2021 (Max Peak Hour)........................................ 14
Table 4.5 Estimation of LoS value for morning (8am – 11am) peak hour for year 2021 ........ 14
Table 4.6 Estimation of LoS value for Evening (5pm – 8pm) peak hour for year 2021 .......... 14
Table 4.7 Estimation of LoS value for year 2031 (Max. Peak Hour)....................................... 15
Table 4.8 Estimation of LoS value for morning (8am – 11am) peak hours for year 2031 ...... 15
Table 4.9 Estimation of LoS value for evening (5pm – 8pm) peak hours for year 2031 ......... 15
Table 4.10 Estimation of LoS value for year 2041 (Max. Peak Hour) ..................................... 16
Table 4.11 Estimation of LoS value for morning (8am – 11am) peak hours for year 2041 .... 16
Table 4.12 Estimation of LoS value for evening (5pm – 8pm) peak hours for year 2041 ....... 16
Table 6.1 Parking Statement – Retrieval Analysis ................................................................... 27
Table 6.2 Retrieval Analysis – Rumah Bali (Building types: A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, B2, B3) .. 27
Table 6.3 Retrieval Analysis – Rumah Bali (Building types: A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, B2, B3) .. 27
Table 6.4 Retrieval Analysis – Type C (Commercial Building) .............................................. 28
1
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Study Background
S. NO. 100 H. No. 12A, 12B, 14A, 14B, 15A, 15B, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24; N S.N.101
H.NO.5, 109/30/3, 98/1A, 98/3, 100/11/1, 100/11/2pt, at Village Bhyanderpada, Dist, Thane(W)
has been proposed to construct residential building by M/s. Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd..
Conducting a TIA (Traffic Impact Assessment) is a part of the basic requirements to get any new
establishment approved by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF). The Ministry
weighs the potential benefits of the establishment on the surrounding transportation and
environmental systems against the negative impact and decides to approve or reject the
construction of the proposed establishment.
SAGE (Sustainable Approach for Green Environment) LLP has been commissioned by the
project proponent M/s. Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd., to provide a Traffic Impact Study for this
project.
1.2 Scope of the Study
The entire study can broadly be broken into the following tasks:
Visit the site and understand the existing traffic pattern, traffic facilities and field
constraints.
Collect relevant traffic survey data through primary and secondary surveys for traffic
impact assessment.
Quantify the traffic volume and density for road network around the project with and
without extra demand for the coming project
Project the traffic density for next 25 years for road network
2
Study the traffic impact of the development on the surrounding road network with the
consideration of future changes in the traffic and infrastructure.
Study the internal traffic within the site layout to demonstrate the vehicular speed and
space requirement.
Calculate the time requirement to exit the vehicles for disaster management plan during
peak hours.
Identify the adequacy of the transport infrastructure and the remedial measures to
improve the traffic plan.
Preparation of final report, submission and presentation to the committee.
1.3 Report Structure
The report has been organized in the following order:
Chapter 1: A brief introduction of the project
Chapter 2: Background of the project and the road network to be studied is provided
Chapter 3: The primary traffic surveys conducted to obtain the network traffic data
Chapter 4: The performance of the road network in terms of LOS for the current and the
projected future traffic and assess the impact of the proposed complex on the LOS.
Chapter 5: Study of Parking space.
Chapter 6: Retrieval Time calculation in case of emergency as well as peak hours.
Chapter 7: Traffic Management plan during the development as well as after completion
of proposed project for external and internal traffic.
Chapter 8: Summary and Conclusion.
3
1.4 Design Parameters
The basic design parameters considered for the study has been illustrated below:
1. The social status as well as economic well-being of the residents plays an important role
in determining the parking demand for any residential project.
2. The visitors will expect a safe and efficient circulation with good levels of service i.e.
minimum waiting time at security check, proper traffic control at entry/exits, minimum
congestion delays and pleasing aesthetics.
3. A design vehicle is a vehicle whose dimensions and operational characteristics are used
to establish layout geometry. Toyota Innova (Big Car) and Maruti Swift (Small Car) and
Volvo 400 (Fire Tender) were chosen as the design vehicles.
4. The maximum number of traffic a road can carry is referred to as its Capacity or design
service volume. The service volumes considered for the project is given below:
Type of Roadway Road Capacity* Category
10-Lane Divided (Two Way) 5400 Arterial
*Indian Road Congress 106:1990 Urban Road Capacity
5. Level of Service (LoS) can be defined as a letter designation that describes a range of
operating characteristics on a given facility. Six Levels of Services are defined for
capacity analysis. They are given letter designations from A to F, with LoS ‘A’
representing best level of operational standards and LoS ‘F’ the worst.
Table 1.1 Description of LoS based on V/C Ratio
Level of Service
(LoS)
Volume / Capacity
Ratio (V/C) Level of Comfort Nature of flow
A <0.30 Highest Free flow
B 0.30 – 0.50 Reasonably free flow
C 0.50 – 0.70 Stable flow
D 0.70 – 0.90 Threshold Approaching unstable flow
E 0.90 – 0.99 Unstable flow
F ≥1 Lowest Forced Flow
4
1.5 Entry/Exit Lane Capacity
Entry / Exit Lane Capacity for Car Parks
Sr.
No. Type of Entry
Capacity
(Veh/hour/lane)
1
Free flow access into internal distributor road/structure (no parking
spaces immediately after access i.e. ramp distributing to several levels
of car park)
800
2 Free flow access 580
3 Lifting-arm barrier without ticket issue 550
4 Lifting-arm barrier with automatic ticket issue (push button) 360
5 Lifting-arm barrier with access card (slot-based) 235
6 Lifting-arm barrier with transponder (no slot – RFID etc.) 380
Sr.
No. Type of Exit
Capacity
(Veh/hour/lane)
1 Ticket on entry and payment at a manned exit 240
2 Lifting-arm barrier without ticket issue 550
3 Ticket on entry and variable payment to a machine linked to the exit
barrier 270
4 Ticket on entry and operation of the exit barrier by a prepaid ticket or
token 400
5 Free flow exit
Analysis based
on specific road
layout (i.e. yield
etc) *Rates based on:Design recommendations for multistory and underground car parks, Institute of Structural Engineers, 3rd Edition, June 2002 and HBS 2001, FGSV Vertag, January 2002
As per international practices it is preferred to restrict the queue length to around 18m i.e. 3
vehicles. This is also linked with space availability at site for queuing.
5
Chapter 2
Project Background
Plot situated is surrounded by different commercial buildings and hotels. The location of the plot
is suitable for residential and commercial development.
The figure below shows the location of proposed site by M/s. Puranik Builders Pvt. Ltd.
Figure 2-1 Location of Proposed Plot
Rumah Bali G.B.
One
6
Table 2.1 Building Configuration
Sr.No. Description For Proposed Expansion
1. Building
Configuration
Building Type. Configuration
A1 & A2 ST + 29
B (1, 2, 3), A3 & A4 LG + 1st P + 2nd P + G/ 3 Podium + 28
Type C Basement + Gr. + Mezzanine + Office 1
+ Office 2 + 25
Bungalows G + 1
2. Parking 1450
Table 2.2 Parking Details
Building Parking provision
R.B.(A1,A2,A3,A4,B1,B2,B3) 829
G.B. (Type C) 621
Total 1450
2.1 Surrounding Road Network
The project is located at village Bhayander Pada, Ghodbunder Road, Thane. Thane Railway
Station 12 (km) by Road Distance and CST International Airport (km) by Road Distance.24 km
from site which provides local connectivity.
The site is well connected to major landmarks in and around Thane district by road as well as
rail. The project has direct access to Ghodbunder Road. The project provides easy access to other
amenities such as educational, medical and shopping facilities.
7
Figure 2-2 Access Road Network
Ghodbunder
Road
8
Chapter 3
Site Appreciation, Existing Transport Network and Base
Traffic
Extensive surveys were conducted on the road network around the proposed development for
getting the primary data related to the road network. The extensive surveys include Road
Inventory Surveys for network geometry
3.1 Survey Locations
Figure 3-1 Locations for Data Collection (Survey Locations)
Ghodbunder
Road
9
3.2 Schedule of Surveys for Data Collection
Traffic surveys are necessary to gather base data information about existing traffic and travel
pattern on surrounding roads. Traffic surveys were carried out which include the classified traffic
volume counts.
3.3 Road Inventory Survey
Traffic survey was conducted for 12 hours to understand the hourly traffic variation for the
roads. The hourly traffic distribution for different vehicles for all the mentioned locations has
been illustrated in the below figures.
3.3.1 Ghodbunder Road
Figure 3-2 Categories Wise Hourly Traffic Distribution for Ghodbunder Road
10
Figure 3-3 Hourly Total PCU and Volume Distribution for Ghodbunder Road
Figure 3-4 Modal Split (vehicles) for Ghodbunder Road
11
Chapter 4
Traffic Data Analysis
4.1 Traffic Analysis
The road network around the proposed project, Bhayander Pada, Ghodbunder Road, Thane was
analysed to determine its performance in order to observe the current traffic and the projected
traffic for the coming 25 years. To measure the network performance, volume by capacity ratio
(V/C) and Level of Services (LoS) were calculated as per IRC recommendations.
Urban network is also analysed in terms of V/C ratio and LoS. This analysis is done for the three
major and minor roads which will get affected by the traffic in the proposed project.
Figure 4-1 Road access network
Ghodbunder
Road
12
Following are the roads on which analysis has been done and described below are the
methodology adopted for the Traffic Analysis.
1. The first step was to calculate the traffic of this road network for coming twenty years
with the growth rate of 5% per year.
2. Volume of the traffic is converted to PCU (Passenger Car Unit) based on the number of
vehicles and by using the appropriate conversion factor for each type of vehicle.
3. The relevant Design Service Volume (DSV) of each road has been taken as the capacity
as per IRC 106 – 1990.
4. Level of Services (LoS) is identified for each road for each study year on the basis of
Volume by Capacity ratio for the particular road.
5. The LoS has been calculated with and without the new development to identify the
impact of proposed complex on present as well as future traffic on the road network.
13
4.2 Estimation of Capacity and LoS (for current scenario – 2016)
Following analysis is done by considering theoretical capacity of roads. In this analysis the
vehicles parked at the road side has not been considered.
Table 4.1 Estimation of LoS value for current scenario 2016
Road Type of
Carriageway
Road
Category
Total PCU
(Without
Project)
V/C
(Without
Project)
LoS
(Without
Project)
Ghodbunder
Road
10 Lane
(Two Way) Arterial 3676 0.31 B
Table 4.2 Estimation of LoS value for morning peak hours for current year 2016
Road Type of
Carriageway
Road
Category
Total PCU
(Without
Project)
V/C
(Without
Project)
LoS
(Without
Project)
Ghodbunder
Road
10 Lane
(Two Way) Arterial 3072 0.26 A
Table 4.3 Estimation of LoS value for evening peak hours for current year 2016
Road Type of
Carriageway
Road
Category
Total PCU
(Without
Project)
V/C
(Without
Project)
LoS
(Without
Project)
Ghodbunder
Road
10 Lane
(Two Way) Arterial 3609 0.30 A
14
4.3 Estimation of Capacity and LoS (after 5 years scenario-2021)
Table 4.4 Estimation of LoS value for year 2021 (Max Peak Hour)
Road
Type of
Carriagewa
y
Road
Categor
y
Total
PCU
(Withou
t
Project)
Total
PCU
(With
Project
)
V/C
(Withou
t
Project)
V/C
(With
Project
)
LoS
(Withou
t
Project)
LoS
(With
Project
)
Ghodbunde
r Road
10 Lane
(Two Way) Arterial 4691 5071 0.39 0.42 B B
Table 4.5 Estimation of LoS value for morning (8am – 11am) peak hour for year 2021
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Categor
y
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
G
hodbund
er Road
10 Lane
(Two Way) Arterial 3921 4301 0.33 0.36 B B
Table 4.6 Estimation of LoS value for Evening (5pm – 8pm) peak hour for year 2021
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Catego
ry
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project
)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project
)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project
)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
Ghodbund
er Road
10 Lane
(Two Way) Arterial 4605 4985 0.38 0.42 B B
15
4.4 Estimation of Capacity and LoS (after 15 years scenario-2031)
Table 4.7 Estimation of LoS value for year 2031 (Max. Peak Hour)
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Catego
ry
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project
)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project
)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project
)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
Ghodbun
der Road
10 Lane
(Two
Way)
Arterial 7641 8021 0.64 0.67 C C
Table 4.8 Estimation of LoS value for morning (8am – 11am) peak hours for year 2031
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Catego
ry
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project
)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project
)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project
)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
Ghodbun
der Road
10 Lane
(Two
Way)
Arterial 6387 6767 0.53 0.56 C C
Table 4.9 Estimation of LoS value for evening (5pm – 8pm) peak hours for year 2031
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Catego
ry
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project
)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project
)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project
)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
G
hodbund
er Road
10 Lane
(Two Way) Arterial 7502 7882 0.63 0.66 C C
16
4.5 Estimation of Capacity and LoS (after 25 years scenario-2041)
Table 4.10 Estimation of LoS value for year 2041 (Max. Peak Hour)
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Catego
ry
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project
)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project
)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project
)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
Ghodbun
der Road
10 Lane
(Two
Way)
Arterial 12447 12827 1.04 1.07 F F
Table 4.11 Estimation of LoS value for morning (8am – 11am) peak hours for year 2041
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Catego
ry
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project
)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project
)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project
)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
Ghodbun
der Road
10 Lane
(Two
Way)
Arterial 10404 10784 0.87 0.90 D D
Table 4.12 Estimation of LoS value for evening (5pm – 8pm) peak hours for year 2041
Road
Type of
Carriagew
ay
Road
Catego
ry
Total
PCU
(Witho
ut
Project
)
Total
PCU
(With
Projec
t)
V/C
(Witho
ut
Project
)
V/C
(With
Projec
t)
LoS
(Witho
ut
Project
)
LoS
(With
Projec
t)
Ghodbun
der Road
10 Lane
(Two
Way)
Arterial 12220 12600 1.02 1.05 F F
17
4.6 Comparison for traffic impact due to proposed Development
with current facility
Effect of new development on Ghodbunder Road
Figure 4-2 Effect by new development on Ghodbunder Road
18
4.7 Mitigation Measures:
The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) has proposed three
major projects in the region where our site is located. These projects are the Thane-
Ghodbunder Freeway, Borivali-Thane Tunnel and the Mumbai Metro Line 4 (Wadala-
Ghatkopar-Teen Hath Naka (Thane)-Kasarwadavli Metro Project). Also, multimodal corridor
from Virar to Alibaug will reduce the heavy commercial vehicles going from Ghodbunder
road. These upcoming public transport alternatives are expected to reduce the PCU load by
15% and improve the LOS from F to D.
19
Chapter 5
Parking Study Report
5.1 General Development Layout
5.1.1 Background
M/s Puranik Developers Pvt. Ltd. have planned a proposed development at Thane. This site
is well accessed by Public Transport i.e. Railway station, Bus stand.
5.2 Development Layout
The details of the Proposed Residential Development are given below:
The total parking facility proposed for this development is some 1450 parking bays.
The parking statement of vehicles is presented in Table 2.2
The internal traffic circulation and the parking facility at Ground level are presented in
following figures.
Figure 5.1 represents the Parking Layout Plan for Upper Level 2 Floor
Figure 5.2 represents the Parking Layout Plan for Upper Level 1 plan for
Figure 5.3 represents Parking Layout Plan for Lower Ground Level plan
Figure 5.4 represents Parking Layout Plan for Basement Level for building Type C
Figure 5.5 represents Parking Layout Plan for Ground Level for building Type C
Figure 5.6 represents Parking Layout Plan for 2nd
Podium Level for building Type C
Figure 5.7 represents Parking Layout Plan for 3rd Podium Level for building Type C
Figure 5.8 represents Parking Layout Plan for 4th Podium Level for building Type C
20
Figure 5-1 Parking Layout Plan for Upper Level 2 of Type C
21
Figure 5-2 Parking Layout Plan for Upper Level 1 Floor Plan
22
Figure 5-3 Parking Layout Plan for Lower Ground Level plan
23
Figure 5-4 Parking Layout Plan for Basement Level for building Type C
Figure 5-5 Parking Layout Plan for Ground Level for building Type C
24
Figure 5-6 Parking Layout Plan for 2nd Podium Level for building Type C
Figure 5-7 Parking Layout Plan for 3rd Podium Level for building Type C
25
Figure 5-8 Parking Layout Plan for 4th Podium Level for building Type C
26
Chapter 6
Retrieval Analysis
It is important to ensure the safety of each of the occupant of the project during an emergency
via proper DMP. In addition to safety of residents, the vehicles from each parking floor
should be also be retrieved in a systemic manner. The planning of this retrieval is necessary in
case of multilevel parking’s to ensure smooth retrieval in quickest possible time.
The main objective of this analysis is to determine the total time required to vacate the entire
parking area.
Assumptions:
1. Speed for Cars = 10 kmph on straight 5 kmph at curves
2. Headway for Cars = 1 m
3. During an emergency, all ramps will be used for evacuation (exit)
4. During emergency, there will be simultaneous retrieval from multiple exits
5. During emergency, the adjoining area will be cordoned off with help of police and
Retrieval will be marshalled with help of security wardens
6. Cars will be retrieved one level after other
7. Retrieval Time for each car includes the backup maneuver and slow down at turns
8. The principle of LIFO (Last In First Out) will be applied
9. Initial Delay and Circulation Delay time is considered
Sr. No. Description Value
1 Average speed of vehicle within parking lot 10 kmph (5.6 m/sec)
2 Average speed of vehicles on Ramps/turns 5 kmph (2.8 m/sec)
3 Space headway considered 1 m
4 Time headway considered 0.4 second (@10 kmph)
27
Table 6.1 Parking Statement – Retrieval Analysis
Building Parking provision
R.B.(A1,A2,A3,A4,B1,B2,B3) 829
G.B. (Type C) 621
Total 1450
6.1 Retrieval Time Calculation
During peak morning hour, when office going traffic will be predominant, there will be a high
demand of vehicles, i.e. it would be required to retrieve 40% of total vehicles. The total time
taken for retrieval of cars from each floor was calculated. This has been illustrated in Table
No. 6.2.
Table 6.2 Retrieval Analysis (Building types: A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, B2, B3)
Emergency Scenario (100%)
Floor
No. of cars
in lane
width
Total
cars
Exit
lane Time
Total Retrieval Time
considering unforeseen
delays (additional 5 minutes)
Upper
level- 2 4 319 4 5.2 10.2
Upper
level- 1 4 260 4 6.88 11.88
Lower
ground 4 250 4 9.06 14.06
Table 6.3 Retrieval Analysis (Building types: A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, B2, B3)
Peak Scenario (40%)
Floor
No. of cars
in lane
width
Total
cars
Exit
lane Time
Total Retrieval Time
considering unforeseen
delays (additional 5 minutes)
Upper
level- 2 2 128 2 4.66 9.66
Upper
level- 1 2 104 2 6.48 11.48
Lower
ground 2 100 2 8.64 13.64
28
Table 6.4 Retrieval Analysis – Type C (Commercial Building)
Emergency Scenario (100%)
Floor
No. of
cars in
lane
width
Total
cars
Exit
lane Time
Total Retrieval Time
considering unforeseen delays
(additional 5 minutes)
Ground 4 136 4 1.52 6.52
Basement 4 264 4 6.78 11.78
2nd Podium
Floor
4 25
4 8.16 13.16
3rd Podium
Floor
4 50
4 10.04 15.04
4th Podium
Floor
4 146
4 13.14 18.14
Peak Scenario (40%)
Floor
No. of
cars in
lane
width
Total
cars
Exit
lane Time
Total Retrieval Time
considering unforeseen delays
(additional 5 minutes)
Ground 2 54 2 1.32 6.32
Basement 2 106 2 5.8 10.8
2nd Podium
Floor
2 10 2 7.12 12.12
3rd Podium
Floor
2 20 2 8.84 13.84
4th Podium
Floor
2 58 2 11.78 16.78
29
Chapter 7
Swept Path Analysis
It is the analysis of the path of the design vehicle undertaking a moment and/or a turning
manoeuvre. At a basic level this includes calculating the thread of each wheel during the turn
and also calculating the manoeuvring space needed by the vehicle body (front & rear
overhang). This is carried out using swept path analysis which demonstrates the following
analysis:
1. To study the internal traffic plan layout for movement of the designed vehicle and
space requirement.
2. To carry out the swept path analysis of vehicular movement for the proposed site
layout at turning point of plan layout.
3. To suggest the solutions for free flow movement of internal traffic and possible
geometric congestions at the site.
Figure 7-1 Detailed Design and Dimensions of Design Car Vehicle
30
Figure 7-2 Detailed Design and Dimensions of Design Fire Engine Vehicle
31
Figure 7-3 Swept Path Analysis for Car
32
Figure 7-4 Swept Path Analysis for Fire tender
33
Chapter 8
Traffic Management Plan
8.1 Introduction
The road construction and maintenance activities are the integral part of road network
development particularly for developing and transitional economies. The road work zones are
areas of conflict between normal operating traffic, construction workers, road building
machineries and construction traffic. Work zone accidents are caused by several factors such
as frequently changing environment that occurs during road work whereby the driver is often
surprised, insufficient warning signs foe normal and construction traffic, lack of audible
warning to workers and inadequate provisions of safety devices to protect workers. An ideal
way to reduce work zone accidents is to create a working area that does not influence the
normal traffic flow by segregating and shielding the site.
To ensure safety of all, there is a need to adopt an efficient and effective plan for management
of traffic. Work Zone Traffic Management Plans (WZTMP) are required to meet the safety
needs of regular traffic as well as work traffic, ensuring minimum disruption in access to
properties and movement of pedestrians.
8.2 Purpose of Traffic Management Plans (TMP)
The primary purpose of the Traffic Management Plans is to provide for the reasonably safe
and efficient movement of road users through or around the work zones while reasonably
protecting the workers and equipment. When the normal function of the roadway is affected
with the presence of workers and equipment, the TMP provides for continuity of the
movement for motor vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian traffic, transit operations and access to
properties and utilities.
34
Work zones present constantly changing conditions that are not expected by the road users,
which creates an even higher degree of vulnerability for the workers present near the
roadway. A concurrent objective of the TMP is the efficient construction and maintenance of
the highway, as well as efficient resolution of traffic incidents, if any, likely to occur in the
work zone. The TMP, therefore, should facilitate the smooth and efficient flow of traffic as
well as safe working environment.
8.3 Basic Principles of Work Zones Traffic Management Plans
WTMP
The basic safety principles governing the design of roadways should also govern the design of
Work Zones Traffic Management Plans (WTMP). While designing the WTMP, all care
needs to be taken so that anyone coming along the road or the footpath from any direction
understands exactly what is happening and what is expected of him/her.
The aim should be to facilitate the passage of road users through such work zones using
roadway geometrics, roadside features and Traffic Control (TC) devices comparable to those
for normal highway operations. Thus, road user movement should be free from any hazard
with the following aspects in view:
WTMP at work sites should be designed on the assumption that drivers will only
reduce their speeds if they clearly perceive a need to do so. Frequent and abrupt
changes in geometrics such as lane narrowing, dropped lanes, or main roadway
transitions, that require rapid manoeuvres, need to be avoided.
Provisions should be made for the safe operation of work, particularly on high-speed,
high-volume roads.
Bicyclists and pedestrians, including those with disabilities, should be provided with
access and safe passage through the work zones. Bicyclists and pedestrians should be
guided in a clear and positive manner while approaching and traversing the work
zones.
35
Roadway occupancy (i.e. using the roadway for construction activities) should be
scheduled during off-peak hours, and if necessary, night work should be considered
after carefully assessing its pros and cons.
Road users and worker safety and accessibility in work zones should be an integral
and high-priority element of every project, from planning through design and
construction.
Early co-ordination with officials having jurisdiction over the affected cross streets
and those providing emergency services, should take place before roadway or side
street closings.
Special plan preparation and co-ordination with transit, other highway agencies, law
enforcement and other emergency units, utilities, schools and railways are needed for
reducing unexpected and unusual road users resistance.
Special attention may be needed to regulate and control heavy commercial vehicle
traffic in the work zones.
8.4 Planning of WTMP
The planning and designing of WTMP should be based on some of the important
considerations:
1. Provide safety for road users and workers
2. Minimize hindrance or delay to road users
3. Provide clear and positive guidance to road users
4. Ensure roadside safety maintenance
5. Ensure that planners and decision makers have the necessary knowledge
6. Provide good public relations
36
8.5 Traffic Calming
A Traffic Management plan indicating traffic circulation, traffic calming and traffic control is
indicated. Traffic calming is intended to slow and control motor-vehicle traffic in order to
improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. Traffic calming measures are of various types
like speed tables, curb extension, chicane etc. These are mitigation measures to ensure safety.
8.6 Traffic Control Measures
The internal roads are undivided to maintain flexibility of traffic lanes. Minimum 6m wide
roadway width has been provided for the movement of vehicles. Recommended design speed
on the internal road is 15kmph and on the turns is 10kmph. Speed tables will be provided near
the entrance/exit point to control traffic and regulate speed of vehicles. An illustrative picture
is also shown in Figure 7.1. Additionally the following shall be required to maintain traffic
flow at required level of service.
Road Markings and Signage’s: Proper road markings (edge, median, arrows, turning,
Kerb) and signages (direction, turning, speed, and pedestrian crossings) will be
installed and maintained on all roads in the vicinity of project premises.
On-street parking will be prohibited on all external and internal streets.
Pick and drop at designated places only.
Preferably no U-Turn on roadway
Traffic calming measures – speed tables, signage Apart from internal signage – it will
be requested to provide necessary signage and traffic control measures, on
neighbouring roads, – such as Speed limit, Left hand curve, pedestrian crossing etc.
37
Figure 8-1 Traffic Control Measures
38
Chapter 9
Summary and Conclusion
9.1 Summary
The first chapter provided a brief introduction to the presented study and the study area. All
the steps needed to be done in the project were also listed, and the structure of the report was
provided.
The second chapter provided basic information regarding the proposed establishments. The
connectivity of the study area was discussed. Background of the study road network was also
provided.
The third chapter listed down the surveys conducted to generate the basic and primary traffic
data for the study network as well as the residential complex. The summaries of the surveys
were presented.
The fourth chapter dealt with the congestion and LoS analysis of the roads in the network.
The impact of the new development was quantified in terms of V/C ratio. Also, impact
analyses for long term period were carried out with project and without project. Here, it has
been analysed for the coming 20 years with the 10-year intervals. The years in which any road
was reaching its theoretical capacity was also identified.
The fifth chapter is all about parking space proposed for this project.
The sixth chapter gives the retrieval time in case of emergency as well as for peak hours for
proposed project.
The seventh chapter is the analysis of Swept Path movement of vehicles
39
The eight chapter is giving idea about traffic management plan during the project
development and after completion of proposed project.
9.2 Concluding Remarks
Traffic Impact (Current Scenario): Traffic impact analysis shows that, generated traffic
from the proposed new development will not have considerable impact because road width is
wider and traffic density is lower. Also, LoS of each road of the this road network is good as
presented in Table 4.1 on the surrounding road network in terms of change in V/C ratio and
Level of Service. It was also noted that, with all these changes, most of the roads are
providing acceptable level of service (LoS A-C). LOS A represents a condition of free flow
with average travel speed. Two wheelers motor cycles or scooters are more in numbers on
these urban roads than any other vehicle type. Peak hour traffic impact of the entire residential
development on the roads is between 8 am to11 pm (morning peak hours) and 5 pm to 8 pm
(evening peak hours).
All the analysed roads have Level of Service B for Ghodbunder Road. These roads represent
best operating conditions and the general level of comfort and convenience provided to the
road users is excellent.
Traffic Impact (Future Scenario): Traffic congestion level for future scenario at study area
was analysed and their results show minor changes in the V/C ratio and the Level of Service.
This effect would have negligible impact on the future traffic scenario and on the
environment. The proposed road plan for Ghodbunder Road is increased up to 60 meters
which may decrease the traffic congestion, keeping the traffic free flowing and stable. Also
there are several transportation developments coming up in the vicinity of our project site and
the Level of Service will be improved to a great extent due to diversion of PCU load.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
Rumah Bali
Thane
DESIGN ANALYSIS REPORT : 20th July 2017
P u r a n i k B u i l d e r s P v t . L t d .
K A I Z E N D E S I G N S O L U T I O N S
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
2 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report has been prepared for proposed residential
project Rumah Bali at Thane. This report is part of a
process towards obtaining Environmental Clearance from
MOEF. The specific objective of this report is to evaluate
annual energy usage and apply various energy efficiency
measures for ECBC Compliance for maximum Energy
Efficiency.The building was analyzed using hourly energy
simulation to evaluate the performance in terms of energy
consumption and thermal comfort of the occupants. The
purpose of this report is to present the performance of
the design building in comparison to a baseline budget
building based on ECBC 2007.
It is observed via various analysis tools that the
buildings are properly Shaded, Naturally ventilated
& has sufficient Daylight.
It is determined via simulation that the proposed
projects saves 3.30% in Energy over the ECBC 2007
mandated baseline and 2.69 % in Energy over the
ECBC 2017 mandated baseline Similarly EPI
calculated excluding parking area as per ECBC 2007
is 126.73 kWh / Sqm / annum, 127.51 kWh / Sqm /
annum as per ECBC 2007 and 123.30 kWh / Sqm /
annum as per proposed case. EPI Ratio calculated
is 0.97 over ECBC 2017 base case. In addition to
this, if we consider Solar PV generation, the final
saving will rise to 4.70% over the ECBC 2007
mandated baseline and 4.11 over ECBC 2017
mandated baseline
The report is structured as follows.
CLIMATIC ANALYSIS
SHADING ANALYSIS
DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS
VENTILATION CALCULATIONS
HEAT ISLAND EFFECT
SHADING & RADIATION
RENEWABLE ENERGY
ENERGY SIMULATION
HEAT GAIN CALCULATIO
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
3 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
CLIMATIC ANALYSIS :
The Psychrometric Chart above explains that, no other strategy is effective for passive comfort except Shading &
Ventilation. Around 20% of total comfort hours can be achieved by Sun Shading & Natural Ventilation. 10% can be
achieved by ceiling fan forced ventilation & for the rest 70% of the time air conditioning may be required. For this
analysis, the Comfort Criterion was set at 22 to 26 degree C for dry bulb temperature & relative humidity to 70%.
The graph plot on next page clearly shows the degree difference between the Dry Bulb Temperature & Relative
Humidity. That’s why strategies like Evaporative cooling, Thermal mass, Night purging etc. will not be effective at
all. The Pshychrometric Chart above confirms that the only two effective strategies are Shading & Ventilation. As
per the legend, at least 30% of the total hours are in comfort range with an effective wind speed of 3 to 5 m/s. Fan
forced ventilation is certainly an effective strategy & comparatively cheaper than AC.
Next is he annual wind pattern of Mumbai city. The purpose is to understand this Wind Pattern. If you observe
the legend carefully, you will understand that, 10% of the total annual wind is flowing from West direction, which
has a temperature C, with a humidity around 70% & maximum wind speed is 8 m/s at one point of time. The
predominant wind direction in Monsoon Period is West – South-West.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
4 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
DRY BULB X RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ANNUAL WIND PATTERNS
MONTH WISE DETAILS
SEASONAL WIND PATTERNS
SUMMER WINTER
JUNE JULY AUGUST
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
5 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
SHADING ANALYSIS:
Mutual shading plays an important role in heat gain through envelope. Though envelope insulation has more
contribution towards heat gain reduction, at the same time Mutual & Window Shading is also effective. The
project team has consciously designed the shading devices reducing insolation on walls & windows. The analysis
confirms that proposed shading devices help to reduce incident radiation on envelope resulting in lesser heat load.
METHODOLOGY -
Virtual analysis tool – Ecotect has been used with the above information as a basis for the commentary provided
in this report. To determine impacts of the proposed project structures, the 3D virtual model of the proposed
building and surrounding structures were created in the software. Actual weather file of Mumbai were used for
the simulation.
OBJECTIVE -
The aim of the study is to assess the potential impact of proposed shades on the building envelope. The effects of
shading by one building upon another can be either positive or negative depending upon the site-specific
circumstances of the properties involved. A potential benefit of shading for adjacent structures may be a cooling
effect gained during warm weather. Negative consequences of shading include the loss of natural light for passive
or active solar energy applications or the loss of warming influences during cool weather. Factors influencing the
relative impact of shadow effects are site-specific and include differences in terrain elevation between involved
properties, the height and bulk of structures, the time of year, the duration of shading in a day, and the sensitivity
of adjacent land uses to loss of sunlight.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
6 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
HOURLY SHADOW PATTERNS -
CONCLUSION -
Shading analysis confirms that more than 48% of the walls & windows are shaded due to mutual and shading
devices designed in the project.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
7 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS:
Simulation Method - The period of analysis was fixed for 8 hours between 8.00am to 5 pm IST resulting 2,920
hours in total at working plane, 800 mm.
Glass VLT – 50%, Reflectance – Ceiling 70%, Wall 50% & Flooring 20%, Furniture 50%.
Typical Flat 1 – 2BHK
Typical Flat 2 – 1 BHK Typical Flat 3 – 2 BHK
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
8 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
Objective and Methodology:The objective of this analysis is to study daylight levels and their compliance
according to section 4.2.3 in ECBC 2017. The project has choose Daylighting Simulation Method to show the
compliance using BEE approved software. The simulation process has followed / implemented all the assumptions
given below.
Climate data file: Mumbai ISHRAE
Simulation Duration: Annually
Simulation hours: 8 hrs – 09:00 to 17:00 hrs IST
Total 2,920 hrs
Work plane height: 800 mm from the finished floor
Reflectance values:
o Wall 50%
o Ceiling 70%
o Floor 20%
Compliance:As per the requirement, above grade floor areas shall meet or exceed the useful daylight illuminance
(UDI) area requirements listed in table below for 90% of the potential daylit time in a year. This means, buildings
should achieve illuminance level between 100 lux and 2,000 lux for the minimum percentage of floor area
prescribed in the table below for at least 90% of the potential daylit time. However, category for residential
building has not been listed in it. The project is considering optimistic approach to show compliance of the project
i.e. 45% for ECBC, 55% for ECBC+ and 65% for SuperECBC.
Building Category Percentage of above grade floor area meeting the UDI requirement
ECBC ECBC+ SuperECBC
Business, Educational 40% 50% 60%
No Star Hotel Star Hotel Healthcare
30% 40% 50%
Resort 45% 55% 65%
Shopping Complex 10% 15% 20%
Assembly* Exempted
*and other buildings where daylighting will interfere with the functions or processes of 50% (or) of the building floor area
Results and Conclusion:
The project comprises many dwelling units and it is practically infeasible to simulate and shows compliance with
each and every dwelling units. The project has selected worst case analysis approach, where all typical dwelling
units located with maximum surrounding obstruction have been selected to analyse. The results below shows
compliance with the minimum requirement and also achieve SuperECBC.
# Dwelling Unit Average Lux Area below 100 Lux
Area above 2000 Lux
Area under UDI for 90% of
time
Compliance Category
1 Typical 2-BHK Unit 1 550 7% 10% 83% Super ECBC
2 Typical 1-BHK Unit 1 450 8% 8% 84% Super ECBC
3 Typical 2-BHK Unit 2 440 10% 5% 85% Super ECBC
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
9 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
VENTILATION ANALYSIS:
Simulation Method – IES VE MacroFlo
Typical 1 BHK Flat
Space ACPH Required ACPH as per NBC 2016 Compliance
Living Room 4.15 3 - 6 Yes Kitchen 3.35 3 - 6 Yes Bedroom 1 3.30 2 - 4 Yes Bedroom 2 3.35 2 - 4 Yes
Ceiling fan efficiency – Minimum BEE 3 * rated
Exhaust fan efficiency – Not applicable
Geometry Inputs
Opening Properties
Operable Area 66%
Operating Time As per occupancy schedule
Degree of Opening 33°C
Climate Data
Weather File Mumbai ISHRAE
Wind Speed As per climate file Obstruction Analysis
Ventilation Analysis
10 km/ h
20 km/ h
30 km/ h
40 km/ h
50 km/ h hrs443+39835431026522117713288<44
Wind Frequency (Hrs)
10 km/ h
20 km/ h
30 km/ h
40 km/ h
50 km/ h °C45+403530252015105<0
Average Wind Temperatures
10 km/ h
20 km/ h
30 km/ h
40 km/ h
50 km/ h %95+8575655545352515<5
Average Relative Humidity
10 km/ h
20 km/ h
30 km/ h
40 km/ h
50 km/ h mm1.0+0.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.2<0.1
Average Rainfall (mm)
Prevailing WindsW ind Frequency (Hrs)
Location: Mumbai, IND (18.9°, 72.8°)
Date: 1st January - 31st December
Time: 00:00 - 24:00
© Weather Tool
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
10 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
HEAT ISLAND EFFECT:
Urban development has serious effects on the global environmental quality, including the quality of air, increase in
temperature and traffic congestion. Construction of building itself is related to global changes in terms of increase
of urban temperatures, the rate of energy consumption, the increased use of raw materials, pollution and the
production of waste, conversion of agricultural land to developed land, loss of biodiversity and water scarcity. An
urban heat island is a climatic phenomenon in which urban areas have higher air temperature than their rural
surroundings as a result of anthropogenic modifications of land surfaces, significant energy use and its consequent
generation of waste heat. Thus, this might prove to be an unsustainable factor that leads to excessive energy use
for cooling and putting the urban population at great risk for morbidity and mortality. According to the above
perspective and considering that rapid and huge population growth is expected in the near future, it becomes
increasingly important to apply heat island mitigation strategies in order to reduce energy consumption and
improve the quality of life.
Effects of Urban Heat Island
• Increased in cooling demand;
• Increased in energy usage;
• Increased air pollution;
• Increased CO2 emissions;
• Climate change;
• Increase health problems;
• Heat related illness & death;
• Impaired water quality
Absorption of solar radiation
During the day in rural areas, the solar energy absorbed near the ground evaporates water from the vegetation
and soil. Thus, while there is a net solar energy gain, this is compensated to some degree by evaporative cooling.
In urban development, where there is less vegetation, the buildings, streets and sidewalks absorb the majority of
solar energy input.
CONCLUSION -
From the results on the next page, it can be clearly seen that because of measures like Solar Panels on roof, Light
Coloured or Open Grid Pavers, Shaded Streets, Maximum Green Area etc. there is a considerable decrease of 72%
in the Surface Absorbed Radiation resulting is reduction of Cooling Loads.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
11 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
Case 1: The case has been assumed with all the proposed buildings with convectional finish on top, asphalt road and dark colored paving on site without any green space.
Case 2: The case has been proposed with light coloured road surface and paver blocks with green space in open area areas which is help to reduce urban air temperature in surroundings.
High SRI Paints Light Colored Paver Block Light Coloured & Shaded Roads Green Open Area
Case 1: The case has been assumed with all the proposed buildings with convectional finish on top, asphalt road and dark colored paving on site without any green space.
Case 2: The case has been proposed with light coloured road surface and paver blocks with green space in open area areas which is help to reduce urban air temperature in surroundings.
High SRI Paints Light Colored Paver Block Light Coloured & Shaded Roads Green Open Area
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
12 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
SHADING & RADIATION:
Analysis of Window Shades on South Façade -
Human Sensitivity Effect Human Sensitivity Effect
Without Shades With Shades
False Colour Rendering False Colour Rendering
Without Shades With Shades
Lux Counter Diagram Lux Counter Diagram
Without Shades With Shades
All windows have been provided Shades of 750 mm depth. Above images explain the effectiveness of Shades. First
image shows that penetration of Direct Radiation is completely nullified. Second image confirms that Glare is
reduced & Visual Comfort is increased. Third image clarifies that daylight is Evenly Distributed in the space.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
13 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
Analysis of Incident Radiation on South & North Façade -
Incident Radiation on SouthEast Facade Incident Radiation on South East Facade
Without Shades With Shades
Incident Radiation on North West Facade Incident Radiation on North West Facade
Without Shades With Shades
CONCLUSION -
The incident solar ingression has been analyzed for South East and North West façade, considering both the
surfaces are most critical during summer period. In case 1, analysis was carried out on both the facades without
shades. The same orientation is analyzed with overhangs of 750mm in Case 2. The North East façade and South
West façade are getting reduced incident radiation by 35% and 17% respectively.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
14 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
Following images also show that the windows are completely shaded in summer season blocking summer heat &
welcoming winter sun when it is required.
21ST
DECEMBER 1PM
21ST
MARCH 1PM
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
15 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
RENEWABLE ENERGY:
Appliance Energy Consumption
Per Appliances (Watts) No. Of Appliances
Total Energy
Consumptio
n (Watts)
LED Tube light 20 2 40
Ceiling Fan 60 1 60
Total Energy Consumption / Apartment 100
Total Number of apartments in proposed Project 532 NO.
Required Renewable energy for proposed project 53.2 kW
Renewable energy proposed for the Project 55 kW
Total Connected Load 8358 kW
Maximum Demand Load 4179 kW
1% of Demand Load 41.79
Solar PV Capacity as per ECBC 2017 42 kW
RETScreen Calculation
Solar tracking mode
Fixed
Slope
20
Azimuth
0
Solar Data
Photovoltaic
Type
poly - Si
Power Capacity kW 55
Number of Units
240
Efficiency % 14.10%
Nominal operating cell temperature ° C 45
Temperature coefficient % / ° C 0.4
Solar collector area m ² 391
Miscellaneous losses % 5%
Inverter
Efficiency % 85%
Capacity kW 23
Miscellaneous losses % 5%
Summary
Capacity Factor % 16.90%
Electricity export rate Electricity explored to Grid - annual
Electricity exported to grid MWh 72
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
16 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
ENERGY ANALYSIS:
Proposed Rumah Bali Project at Thane lies in
western India. The total built-up area of residential
buildings is about 1,78,579 m2 distributed over a
large area along with club house facility & other
amenities. The overall Window to Wall Ratio is
approximately 25%.
A zoning plan was developed for each floor &
entered into the simulation model. Each zone was
assigned a set of properties including lighting power
density, equipment power density, occupancy rate,
outside air requirement etc. Each zone was also
assigned physical properties of floor-to-floor height,
material conductivity & fenestration area etc.
A baseline building as per the properties stated in
ECBC 2007 was modelled. The Building was
simulated with actual orientation and again after
rotating the entire Building by 90, 180 & 270
Degrees and then the annual energy consumption
results were averaged out to get the ECBC 2007
Baseline Building Energy consumption in kilowatt
hours. As per ECBC 2007, the average base case
energy consumption does not consider the effect of
building shades & overhangs.
A wide range of actual as-designed parameters such
as Envelope (roofs, walls), Windows (type of
window glass), Lighting (lighting power density),
reduced Exterior Lighting, efficient system design
were added to the Baseline case to simulate the
performance of the designed building.
The project has been modelled with the e-QUEST
energy analysis software that uses the DOE 2.2
Building energy simulation engine. The e-QUEST
energy modelling software allows for a graphical
display of all the 3-dimensional geometry entered in
the application to describe the building. As per the
view shown, the Building has been modelled in detail
to improve the accuracy of analysis work.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
17 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
BASELINE MODEL as per ECBC 2007
The ECBC 2007 Minimally Compliant Baseline model
is used to benchmark the design case. This model
geometry is based upon the design case, but the
performance parameters listed below are defined to
reflect the minimum efficiency levels that ECBC 2007
defines for various building components.
These parameters are listed below.
Building Envelope
Exterior wall construction:
U-value –0.44 W/Sq.m.K
Roof Construction:
U-value – 0.409 W/Sq.m.K
Window wall ratio: 25%.
Fenestration type:
U-Value : 3.3 W/Sq.m.K
SHGC (All) : 0.25
Shading Devices: None.
Lighting Equipment
Lighting Power Density is considered according
to building area method,
LPD : 7.5 W/Sqm
Service Hot Water
20% on Solar hot water system
Air Side HVAC System
As per ANNEXURE-I all bedrooms and living
rooms are modelled as conditioned spaces with
unitary air conditioners assigned to each zone
with COP 3.0. Kitchen areas are modelled with
unit ventilators.
EPI of tenant building 1 excluding parking area is
102.32 kWh / Sqm / annum as per ECBC 2007.
Based on above parameters. The average base-case
consumption is 18, 273 MWh.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
18 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
BASELINE MODEL as per ECBC 2017
The ECBC 2017 Minimally Compliant Baseline model
is used to benchmark the design case. This model
geometry is based upon the design case, but the
performance parameters listed below are defined to
reflect the minimum efficiency levels that ECBC 2017
defines for various building components.
These parameters are listed below.
Building Envelope
Exterior wall construction:
U-value – 0.40 W/Sq.m.K
Roof Construction:
U-value – 0.33 W/Sq.m.K
Window wall ratio: 25%.
Fenestration type:
U-Value : 3.0 W/Sq.m.K
SHGC (Non North) : 0.25
(North) : 0.50
Shading Devices: None.
Lighting Equipment
Lighting Power Density is considered according
to building area method,
LPD : 7.70 W/Sqm As per ECBC 2017
Service Hot Water
40% on Solar hot water system
Air Side HVAC System
As per ANNEXURE-I all bedrooms and living
rooms are modelled as conditioned spaces with
unitary air conditioners assigned to each zone
with COP 3.0. Kitchen areas are modelled with
unit ventilators.
EPI of tenant building 1 excluding parking area is
101.85 kWh / Sqm / annum as per ECBC 2017.
Based on above parameters. The average base-case
consumption is 18,189 MWh.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
19 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
PROPOSED CASE
Proposed case assumptions are based on project
drawings and operating parameters assumptions
based on experience and standards.
Building Envelope
Exterior wall construction : 8” AAC Block wall
U- Value: 0.56 W/Sq.m.K
Roof Construction : 6”RCC + 2” XPS Insulation
U-Value : 0.404 W/Sq.m.K
Window to wall ratio: 25%
Fenestration type:
Saint Gobain ET 150 II Clear (SGU)
U-Value : 5.0 W/Sq.m.K
SHGC : 0.50
VLT : 50%
Shading Devices: As per Design.
Lighting Equipment
Lighting Power Density is considered according
to building area method,
LPD : 5.0 W/Sq.m.
Service Hot Water
25% on solar
Air Side HVAC System
As per ECBC 2007, all bedrooms and living rooms
are modelled as conditioned spaces with unitary
air conditioners assigned to each zone with COP
3.0. Kitchen areas are modelled with unit
ventilators.
Utility Rates -
Energy charge : 5/kWh
EPI of tenant building 1 excluding parking area is
99.17 kWh / Sqm / annum as per proposed case.
Based on above parameters, The average base-case
consumption is 17,710 MWh.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
20 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
SUMMARY
The Proposed case model shows significant savings in
internal lighting as well as space cooling energy
consumption as compared with the ECBC 2007 and 2017
stipulated baseline model. These energy reductions can
primarily be attributed to improved lighting power
density and reduction in cooling loads due to improved
envelope and glazing specifications.
For the purposes of determining energy savings in
rupees, the energy costs for the proposed case model are
compared to the energy costs for the ECBC 2007 and
2017 minimally-compliant model.
Based on the final design considerations for building
envelope and equipment, it is noted from the results of
energy simulation that by using efficient envelope and
lighting, the total annual energy required for Proposed
Rumah Bali Projec is 17,710 MWh. The energy required
for the baseline model as per ECBC 2007 is simulated to
be 18,273 MWh, whereas the energy required for the
baseline model as per ECBC 2017 is simulated to be
18,189 MWh, The total energy cost saving is 3.08% over
ECBC 2007 base case and 2.63% over ECBC 2017 base
case.
With current proposed case, the building is saving upto
3.08% in energy over ECBC 2007 base case & will be able
to save 563 MWh annually. Similarly the building is saving
upto 2.63% in energy over ECBC 2017 base case & will be
able to save 479 MWh annually.
In addition to this, if we consider Solar PV generation
from 55 kW, which is 72 MWh, the final saving will rise to
3.47 % over ECBC 2007 and 3.02 over ECBC 2017.
EPI of proposed building excluding parking area is 102.32
kWh/Sqm/annum as per ECBC 2007, 101.85
kWh/Sqm/annum as per ECBC 2017 and 99.17
kWh/Sqm/annum for proposed case.
The EPI ratio observed as per ECBC 2017 is 0.97.
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
21 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
APPENDIX I WEATHER DATA:
Sun Path, Avg. Monthly Temperature & Solar Radiation -
Sun Path Diagram for Mumbai
Design Temperature for Mumbai
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
22 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
APPENDIX II Detailed comparison between Base case & Proposed case:
S.NO. Model Input Parameter
Baseline Case (As per ECBC 2007)
Baseline Case (As per ECBC 2017)
Proposed Case
1. Exterior Wall Construction
U-factor = 0.44 W/Sq.m.K
U-factor =0.63 W/Sq.m.K
8” External Wall with AAC Blocks U-factor = 0.56 W/Sq.m.K
2. Roof Construction U-factor = 0. 409 W/Sq.m.K Insulation entirely above deck.
U-factor = 0. 33 W/Sq.m.K Insulation entirely above deck.
6” RCC slab with 2”XPS Insulation U-factor = 0. 404 W/Sq.m.K
3. Glazing
U Value: 3.3
W/Sq.m.K
SHGC (All) : 0.25
U Value: 3.0 W/Sq.m.K
SHGC Non North) : 0.25
(North) : 0.50
U Value : 5.5 W/Sq.m.K
SHGC : 0.50, 0.66 (For Building 1)
VLT : 50%, 65% (For Building 1)
4. WWR 25% 25% 25%
5. Shading No shades No shades Shading effect of solar panel on roof and
shading devices on all façade is considered.
6. EPD 1.5 W/ft2
1.5 W/ft2
1.5 W/ft2
7. Pumps & Motors IE 2 IE 2 IE 3
8. LPD 7.5 W/sq.m. 7.70 W/sq.m. 5.0 W/sq.m.
9. External Lighting Load
300 kW 300 kW 210 kW
10. Domestic Hot Water
20% on Solar
(20 ltr/person/day)
40% on Solar
(20 ltr/person/day)
25% on Solar
(20 ltr/person/day)
11. HVAC System Type
Packaged Single Zone
(Split Unit) with COP
3.0.
Packaged Single Zone
(Split Unit) with COP 3.0
Packaged Single Zone (Split Unit) with COP 3.0
12. Process Loads 3162 kW 3162 kW 3162 kW
13. DG Set Not Applicable BEE 3 Star Rated BEE 3 Star Rated
14. PF Correction 0.95 0.97 0.97
15. Power Distribution
Losses >1% > 3% > 3%
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
23 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
APPENDIX III Schedules Used for calculations –
Schedules Used for calculations –
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%0
-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
OCCUPANCY DAY SCHEDULE
Typical Occupancy Schedule for Living room, Dining room & Kitchen
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
OCCUPANCY NIGHT SCHEDULE
Typical Occupancy Schedule for Bedrooms
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
24 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
LIGHTING DAY SCHEDULE
Typical Lighting Schedule for Living room, Dining room & Kitchen
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
LIGHTING NIGHT SCHEDULE
Typical Lighting Schedule for Bedrooms
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
25 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
EQUIPMENT DAY SCHEDULE
Typical Equipment Schedule for Living room, Dining room & Kitchen
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
EQUIPMENT NIGHT SCHEDULE
Typical Equipment Schedule for Bedroom
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
26 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
COOLING DAY SCHEDULE
Typical Cooling Schedule for Living room & Dining room
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
COOLING NIGHT SCHEDULE
Typical Cooling Schedule for Bedroom
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
9-1
0
10
-11
11
-12
12
-13
13
-14
14
-15
15
-16
16
-17
17
-18
18
-19
19
-20
20
-21
21
-22
22
-23
23
-24
Time
EXTERIOR LIGHTING SCHEDULE
Typical Exterior Lighting Schedule
ON
OFF
ON
OFF
BUILDING PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
27 Rumah Bali, Thane Kaizen Design Solutions
Peak Condition - 25 October 3 pm
Sr.
No.Description
Heat Gain in kW
Base Case
Sensible + Latent
Heat Gain in kW
Proposed Case
Sensible + Latent
1 Wall Conduction (S) 34 44
2 Roof Conduction (S) 2 2
3 Glass Conduction (S) 57 63
4 Glass Solar (S) 74 81
5 Lights to Space (S) 32 19
6 Equipments to Space (S) 47 47
7 Occupants to Space (S+L) 43 43
8 Infiltration (S+L) 62 62
9 Total Load 351 362
10 % Increase 3.01
Heat Gain Calculation – Building Peak Load Components - LS-C Report, has been analysed here. The building heat gain
comparison between base case & proposed case is as follows. It is clearly observed from the
table below that, for a naturally ventilated residential building, Envelope Shading is also an
effective strategy along with insulation. Though the Base case (With Insulation – Without
Shading) still has a lesser heat gain as compared to Proposed case (Without Insulation – With
Shading), but the difference is marginal & can be easily compensated by reducing lighting &
Equipment consumptions. This is possible mainly because Reduced Sol Air Temp & Shaded
Walls, Windows & Roof.
GLC
Impact Due To Construction 2
CONSTRUCTION PHASE AIR EMISSION
Sr.No Activity Formula for emission factor Unit Emission rate
1 Loading of debris into trucks E=[0.0081{(100-m/ m)/m}1.4 {s/(100 / s)}0.4(uh* l)0.1]
m=moisture content of material(%) s=silt content of loading material(%) u=wind speed(m/s) h=drop height (m) l=size of loader (m3) E=emission (g/s)
g/s 0.0048
2 Unloading of debris E=[1.76h1/2{(100-m)/m}0.2{(s/100-s)}2u0.8(cy0.1)]
m=moisture content of material(%) s=silt content of unloading material(%) u=wind speed(m/s) c= capacity of dumper (ton) y=frequency of unloading (nos./hr)
h=drop height (m) E=emission (g/s)
g/s 0.454226
3 Truck transport of debris and construction material and waste
E=[{(100 - m)/m}0.35 {us/(100 - s)}0.7 {0.5 + 0.1f + 0.42v)}10-3]
m=moisture content of road dust(%) s=silt content of road dust(%) u=wind speed (m/s) v=avg vehicle speed (m/s) f=frequency of vehicle movement (no/hr) Emission rate=g/s/m
g/s/m 0.0061
4 Exposed Excavated Dump E= {(100-m)/m}0.2{(s/(100-s))}0.1{u/(2.6+120u)}{a/(0.2+276.5a)}
m=moisture content of material(%) s=silt content of material(%) u=wind speed(m/s) a= area (km2)
E=emission (g/s)
g/s 4.57015E-06
Continued… 3
GLC DUE TO CONSTRUCTION (PM10 Concn)
Sr. No Monitoring location GLC without mitigation
1. Project site 15.8222
1. Lodha Casa 5.1499
1. Dhanvantari Hospital, Owale 1.2377
1. Krishna Green Land park society 0.2671
1. Hypercity Mall 0.6328
1. Bhayandarpada 0.9510
1. Hawaiian Village 1.8582 NAAQS LIMITS 100
Continued… 4
Construction phase dust emission after mitigation
Construction phase dust emission without mitigation
Continued… 5
EMISSION DUE TO OPERATION OF DG SET AND PROJECT TRAFFIC
Description Details DG capacity (KVA) 320x2 nos 250x 1 nos 200x1 nos. Diesel consumption (kg/hr) 55 43 34 Sulfur content (%) 0.25 Nitrogen content (%) 0.08 PM10 0.0020 0.0016 0.0012 PM2.5 0.0012 0.0009 0.0007 SO2 0.00008 0.00006 0.00005 NOx 0.00004 0.000031 0.00003
Emission Due To Operation Of DG Set
Continued… 6
INCREMENTAL CONCENTRATION DUE TO PROPOSED PROJECT Ground level concentration at monitoring location after operation of proposed project due to operation of DG set and project traffic is as shown below.
Location code Location Parameter Baseline concentration Incremental Resultant NAAQ
S
A1 Project site
PM10 63 0.0327 63.0327 100 PM2.5 43 0.0228 43.0228 60 NOx 30.4 0.3632 30.7632 80 SO2 21.5 2.00E-05 21.5000 80 CO 1.28 0.00150045 1.2815 4
A2 Lodha Casa
PM10 70 0.0371 70.0371 100 PM2.5 49 0.0258 49.0258 60 NOx 29.1 0.4106 29.5106 80 SO2 23.9 5.00E-05 23.9001 80 CO 1.1 0.00121115 1.1012 4
A3 Dhanvantari Hospital, Owale
PM10 66 0.1428 66.1428 100 PM2.5 45 0.0979 45.0979 60 NOx 31.6 1.5607 33.1607 80 SO2 22.4 6.00E-05 22.4001 80 CO 1.22 0.00443275 1.2244 4
A4 Krishna Green Land Park society
PM10 68 0.0250 68.0250 100 PM2.5 47 0.0176 47.0176 60 NOx 39.2 0.2802 39.4802 80 SO2 29 3.00E-05 29.0000 80 CO 1.18 0.00071908 1.1807 4
A5 Hypercity Mall
PM10 62 0.0187 62.0187 100 PM2.5 45 0.0133 45.0133 60 NOx 36.8 0.2109 37.0109 80 SO2 27.3 5.00E-05 27.3001 80 CO 1.15 0.00078487 1.1508 4
A6 Bhayandarpada
PM10 78 0.0125 78.0125 100 PM2.5 55 0.0088 55.0088 60 NOx 40.5 0.1389 40.6389 80 SO2 25.1 1.00E-05 25.1000 80 CO 1.29 0.00054834 1.2905 4
A7 Hawaiian Village
PM10 48 0.0079 48.0079 100 PM2.5 31 0.0057 31.0057 60 NOx 40 0.0902 40.0902 80 SO2 26.6 4.00E-05 26.6000 80 CO 1.09 0.00038163 1.0904 4
Continued… 7
Operation phase PM 2.5 Operation phase PM 10
Continued… 8
Operation phase So2 Operation phase NOx
Continued… 9
Operation phase CO Conclusion: No major change in baseline concentration due to propose project
Water Balance chart 1
TOTAL -1042 KLD WATER REQ.
From Local Corporation:648KLD
TOTAL RECYCLED WATER REQ. 394 KLD
TOTAL FRESH WATER REQ. 648 KLD
SEWAGE GENERATED 858 KLD
STP CAPACITY – 860 cu.m
TREATED WATER 771 KLD
Landscape 55 KLD
377 KLD Excess treated
Flushing 339 KLD
IS 1172 90LPCD-DOMESTIC (Residential) 45 LPCD-FLUSHING (Residential)
Non Monsoon Season
Provision shall be, made to use this treated water in traffic islands, divider at GB road, side wall planters at service road, parks nearby.
Water Balance chart 2
TOTAL WATER REQ. 1042 KLD
From TMC:500KLD
TOTAL RECYCLED WATER REQ. 339 KLD
TOTAL FRESH WATER REQ. 648 KLD
SEWAGE GENERATED 858 KLD
STP CAPACITY 860 cu.m
TREATED WATER 771 KLD
432 KLD Excess treated water
Flushing 339 KLD
IS 1172 90LPCD-DOMESTIC (Residential) 45 LPCD-FLUSHING (Residential)
Monsoon Season RWH 148 cum
Sewerage layout 3
STP of C1, C2 230 KLD
A1, A2, B1 STP - 360 KLD
B2, B3, A3, A4 , Bungalows STP - 270 KLD
Inlet & Outlet Parameters 4
Raw Sewage Characteristics PH 6- 8.5
BOD 250 - 350 mg/l COD 500 - 600 mg/l O & G ~ 60 mg/l TSS 300 mg/l
Treated Sewage Characteristics (For Re-Use)
PH 6- 8
BOD < 5 mg/l
COD < 30 mg/l
O & G < 1 mg/l
TSS < 5 mg/l
Sewage Treatment Scheme - MBBR Effluent Characteristics •The effluent generated during activities contains mainly: •Suspended / colloidal organic components like food waste, toilet flushing, basins and hand wash, etc. •Dissolved organic components •Dissolved inorganic solids of cleaning chemicals Assumptions 1. No other parameter which exceeds the treated sewage limits or which is hazardous in nature,
will affect the biological process is present in the raw sewage. 2. The oil present is in free-floating form.
5 STP FLOW DIAGRAM
6 Vendor based STP section
STP Ventilation 7
Landscape plan
1
Existing Tree Plan 2
--Tree NOC application
Existing trees on site 94
Trees to be retained 21
Trees which have already cut as per tree NoC
73
Trees planted on site for compensation of cutting (5:1)
365
Total trees as per TMC (tree Dep) 606
Total No. of trees after development 992
Green Belt Development 3
Required RG (Green belt) area = 11235.47 Sq.mts. (25%)
Section A- A (reference to Next slide)
2 1
4
5
3
6
Section explaining tree plantation 4
Proposed trees 5
Botanical name Common Name PURPOSE
Centre to centre distance
Plumeria rubra Chafa scented flowers
3 m
Spathodea Nandi Flame Ornamental tree 3 m
Lagerstroemia speciosa Tamhan Ornamental tree
3 m
Bahunia Butterfly tree Ornamental tree
3 m
Casia Fistula Golden Rain tree Shade givers/ornamental tree
3 m
Neolamarckia cadamba Kadamb Noise Reduction /Shade giver
3 m
Albizia saman
Rain tree Noise Reduction /Shade giver
3 m
Manilkara zapota
Chickoo Fruit Bearing tree/shade giver
3 m
Pisonia Alba Evergreen shrub Ornamental tree 2 m
Plumeria alba Evergreen shrub Ornamental tree 2 m
Casuarina equisetifolia Austrelian pine tree Coastal tree 2 m