[email protected] [email protected] stopping the drip looking for new ways to stop...
TRANSCRIPT
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Stopping the drip
Looking for new ways to stop
the harassment of women firefighters
Dr. Dave Baigent GradIFireE, BA Hons, Phd [email protected]
To hear the recorded version go to
www.fitting-in.com/melbourne/drip.WAV
www.fitting-in.com
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Ongoing research on the how firefighters develop and protect their (masculine)
identity
Background– One more last working class hero
(www.fitting-in.com/baigent.pdf)
– Research of a (largely) unreconstructed masculinity (represents a patriarchy at work Walby 1986, 1990)
– Developing an understanding of a source of hegemonic masculinity (Connell 1987, 1995, 2005)
– Qualitative research using to produce findings that firefighters might understand (Grounded Theory Glaser and Strauss 1965Pro-feminist auto critique (Hearn 1994)
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Research (Baigent 2001, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2007) that suggests
Firefighters have three core values/needs
A need to protect the public
A need to protect their watch (group cohesion)
A need to protect their (masculine) identity
Put into practise through
Formal culture (institutional process)
Informal culture (group behaviour)
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Informal Culture
Informal culture is pervasive
Firefighters need to prove that they belong – that they fit-in (concepts of pre-destiny Weber 1971)
Newcomers on the watch are persuaded to fit-in
Power of the group/watch over the individual
Power of the watch to resist managers
Each watch at each station can have a slightly different variable
In a fire service with 25 stations – 4 watches on each station can lead to 100 variants of the informal culture
Every watch forms up under the umbrella of the union
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Research that indicates the extent that male firefighters harass women
First survey “Who Rings The Bell” (Baigent 1996) indicates that over 60% of women firefighters have experienced harassment
Second survey “One Decade On” (Baigent 2006) indicates that over 50% of women firefighters have experienced harassment
Findings supported by HMCIFS (2001), Johnson (2004), Wright (2005)
Recognition by Hearn and Parkin (1987, 1995: 74) and Walby (1990: 52)
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
What does the 2006 data say in reply to the question about harassment?
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid Yes119 52.4 53.4
53.4
No99 43.6 44.4
97.8
Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place
5 2.2 2.2100.0
Total 223 98.2 100.0
Missing System 4 1.8
Total 227 100.0
119 (53.4%) of the respondents replied “Yes” 99 (44.4%) replied “No.” Five women fell into the fell into the group whose qualitative response were recorded as “Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place.”
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
When asked “During first year did harassment occur: frequently, occasionally, never?”
26.6% (50) of women answered “Frequently,” 25.5% (61) of women answered “Occasionally” 39.9% (75) of women answered “Never.” Two women firefighters fell into the group whose qualitative response were recorded as “Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place.”
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid Frequently50 22.0 26.6
26.6
Occasionally61 26.9 32.4
59.0
Never75 33.0 39.9
98.9
Comments indicate bullying/harassment has taken place
2 .9 1.1100.0
Total 188 82.8 100.0
Missing System 39 17.2
Total 227 100.0
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
The Drip
Sonia: I was excluded … It was instigated by one person who was very influential
Sue: Another member of the watch not speaking to me or communicating
during drills - practical "jokes" eggs in shoes wetting me etc
Sarah: In the first year, just remarks questioning my strength and ability to
do the job. But these comments were always made by the same person with an audience .. not one on one
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Official support for women and recognition of their sexual harassment
HMCIFS (1999) labels fire service as institutionally sexist
Bain Enquiry (2002) identifies unacceptable treatment of
women
Select Committee (2006) identifies failure to meet targets
for women firefighters
Chief Inspector of Fire Service (2006)
A worse situation than 20 years ago
Not the bottom of the league but in a different league
Minister for Fire makes it very clear that she expects more women to be employed (Smith 2007)
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Recognition of reality –Women are being harassed
A number of interventions
Moral argument
Education
Sanctions
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Moral argument fairness for all supported by FBU/employersFailed
EducationAll firefighters receive equality training Failed
SanctionsStrict discipline measures threatenedFailed
AnalysisEducationProvides the tools for men to avoid being caughtThreat Increases secrecy -Drives harassment further undergroundIncreases group solidarityCulture identifies the harasser as victimWomen afraid to speak out because of backlash
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Structural/institutional or individuals?
Case studiesFour women who left the fire service
– Principal Manager • challenged the culture just be being there• marginalised by other principal managers throughout the fire service• held her ground – worn down - took out a sexual harassment action• weakened - settled out of court (including a silencing agreement)
– Watch manager• successful career• promoted and not accepted by peers• looked for help – unsupported by managers – took out sexual harassment
action • weakened - settled out of court (including a silencing agreement)
– Firefighter• treated badly • stood up against the men - worn down • weakened – took out sexual harassment action – settled out of court
(including a silencing agreement)– Student
• harassed whilst on work-placement • kept secret • spoke out after she left – will not now join the fire and rescue service
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
AnalysisPractise
Occasionally overt sexism
Mostly a drip drip (having a laugh)
Common factor
The group (watch) allow this behaviour
Outcomes
Victim – fit-in – stay -?
Victim – fit-in - resist – leave
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
What’s happening to the woman?
First caught in the headlights– Woman able to recognise what was happening– Believing once men accepted them it would get better– Some women just accept this situation
Some still caught in headlights– Wanting justice– Doubting sanity– Psychologically unable to continue
Could have been solved– If the group had chosen this behaviour could have
been stopped
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
What’s happening in the organisation
Defend the victim Until the point when they take legal action
Then – Caught in headlights managers are transfixed by the need to
protect the organisation– The perpetrator may be to blame but with a court case looming
until the organisation can buy her silence they must act against the women
– After buying the women’s silence there is no evidence against the perpetrator
Result– Little or no recognition of the problem– Avoiding or not even looking for the truth– Little or no attempt to take the moral high ground– Women learn the lesson that if they complain they will loose their
job
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Firefighters attending to their needs(Defending their identity and hegemony)
Firefighters believe they need to fit-in with each other to maintain the cohesive team
Watch develops a collective memory and in some ways this makes each watch unique
This collective memory (tradition) is protected by each cohort of firefighters for the next generation
Handed down through homosociality – protected by bullying and harassment
The individual fulfils their needs through the group (watch) they work with
The watch (their work) becomes their way of understanding the world
The individual in the fire service (through their informal culture) may be attending to all five needs (Maslow 1987); including the potential to believe they self-actualise
Hegemony will only end once people remove support
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Men’s hierarchy’s
Culturally dominant Hegemonic masculinity
Complicit masculinities
Subordinated masculinities
Culturally less powerful women
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Looking for a way of turning this situation around
Something that – Employers can gain from– Helps the individual victim– Helps the individual harasser– Leaves the team intact– Does not stop fitting-in– Does not remove the healthy and antagonistic
relations that exist– Something that breaks the circle of violence –
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
The circular question from Avon’s women and leadership conference (2006)
Question
How do we increase the numbers of women firefighters in the fire and rescue service?
Answer
Change the culture
Question
How do we change the culture?
Answer
Increase the number women firefighters in the fire and rescue service
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Concept of empowering the victim
Victim is only the victim because they are trapped
Fire Service are also trapped
Fire Service’s inability to do anything also adds to victim’s powerlessness
Women must fit-in or leave
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Two ways forwardFormally
Senior Managers must recognise what is happeningUnderstand the complicated cultural arrangementsRecognise you cannot warm up the whole seaConcentrate resources on one areaJunior managers must be trained to intervene
Informally Spartacus momentSomeone must speak out to stop the drip
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Stopping the drip
Looking for new ways to stop
the harassment of women firefighters
www.fitting-in.com
Dr. Dave Baigent GradIFireE, BA Hons, Phd
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
To find research on the fire service visit
www.fitting-in.com
To share/publish your research on the fire service send it to
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Out takes follow
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Complicated arrangements associated with Hegemonic Masculinity
Connell: a social experience which establishes the gender hierarchy as taken for granted
Hearn: a social phenomenon that ‘all’ men gain from; reinforced by some men through violence
Walby: a social practise through which men adopt a patriarchal position to dominate women
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Every Social group must … secure for its individual and group membership:The satisfaction of material and economic needs.The maintenance of spontaneous co-operation throughout the organization(Mayo 1949)The apprentice learned to be a good workman, and he also learned to ‘get on
with’ his fellows(Mayo 1949)(See also Baigent 2006 Mayo)Whilst Mayo provides considerable insight to the power of the group and this
insight can be operationalized from research in the fire service, what has yet to be explored alongside Mayo’s understanding of how powerful the group can be, is that the group does not want to change.
Leader at ground level (operational) may defer to maintaining group cohesion over and above everything else.
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
Connell’s Gender Hierarchy
Connell suggests gender relations are far from being ‘fixed’ ‘ or an assured thing.
Rather he sees it as an ongoing process and the outcome of human agency
Masculinity is not a coherent subject that academics are always comfortable in generalising about
Masculinities are relational - constructed against an other (traditionally femininity)
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]
[email protected] www.fitting-in.com [email protected]