1

________________________________________________________________________ The Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia Justice Susan Kiefel AC Parkes Pl, Parkes ACT2600 Dear Madam, I, David John Walter, am a single shareholder in the Company the Commonwealth of Australia as held to PREAMBLE of the DEED of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). I, David John Walter, reside at Lot 187 Walsh River Road, Watsonville, Queensland. I present to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, a signed and dated petition, as held in The Petition of Right [1627] 1627 CHAPTER 1 3 Cha 1. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) is held in the Partnership Act 1890 and the Seal of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia is held to that Seal of the Partnership Act 1890 as held to COMPANIES ACT 1948 II & 12 Ceo. 6. Chapter 38, in 1948 Her Majesty the Queen’s Father George VI. The Company the Commonwealth of Australia is a private business and commenced trading in the Legal tender of the Company, 1 January, 1901 as held to Section 52. The Company the Commonwealth is not subject to Bankruptcy proceedings. It is not in receivership, it is very simply not operating, the Headquarters of the Company, which is Parliament House, has no elected Representatives of the shareholders in the House of Representatives with Her Majesty the Queen as the speaker sitting alone and no elected Members of the Senate, which is totally vacant. The answer is very simple the Company the Commonwealth of Australia conducts all finance and trade in the Legal tender of the Company as held to COINAGE No. 6 of 1909 An Act relating to Currency, Coinage, and Legal Tender. [Assented to 4th September, 1909.] In the 14th February, 1966, the Members of the Liberal Party of Australia who were the elected Representatives of the Company in the Executive Government/s of the Company signed a FINANCIAL AGREEMENT (DECIMAL CURRENCY) Act No.39 1966 with ELIZABETH 11 and having the Act Assented to on 29 September 1966 - HOUSING, and commenced trading in Australian Decimal Currency as held to Currency Act 1965 Act No. 95 of 1965 as amended, to make profit for themselves and their Registered Members.

David J. Walter

Post Office Box 578 Tel. (07) 4096 3009 Herberton, Australia e-mail samara.butterfly@skymesh.com.au 'Where there is no vision the people perish; but he that keepeth the

law, happy is he' - Proverbs Ch.29 v.18

2

As the elected Representatives of the shareholders in the House of Representatives with Her Majesty the Queen as Speaker and the Senate they signed a Commercial Contract with a “foreign queen” ELIZABETH II, of “foreign power’ AUSTRALIA to borrow Australian Decimal Currency and commence trading in their own private right, in a “Unicameral Parliament’ of Australia “foreign power’ of a ‘foreign queen” Elizabeth II. Some 22 years later had the Queen of Australia Elizabeth II, opened the private building paid for in Australian Currency A$1.1 Billion Dollars and commenced trading, full time for the benefit of the firm, and commenced their own personally appointed Australian Public Servants and their agents etc, in the Currency of the firm digital or electronic currency only. As held to Memorandum of Understanding or the articles of association of the Company, the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK), their position became immediately vacant as held to Section 44. They also failed to give their resignation to the Speaker Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2, to allow Her Majesty the have the Governor-General have writs issued for election to fill the vacancies left- those vacancies remain to this day some 54 years later. 44. Any person who- (i.) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power: or shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives. The Premiers of the former Colonies, also members of Liberal Party, in the Legislative Assemblies also failed to give their resignations to the Speaker Her Majesty the Queen to allow, the Governors of the States to sign writs to fill the vacancies in the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council.

An Act to consolidate certain Laws relating to

The Legislative Assembly [ASSENTED TO 28TH DECEMBER 1867.]

WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate certain laws relating to the Legislative Assembly Be it enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly of Queensland in Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows-- Disqualification and Resignation. *4 to 6. 7. If any member of the Assembly - “ in the said House or shall take any oath or make declaration or acknowledgment of allegiance obedience or adherence to any foreign prince or power” “or adopt any act whereby he may become a subject or citizen of any foreign state or power or become entitled to the rights privileges or immunities of a subject of any foreign state or power” or be attainted of treason or be convicted of felony or any infamous crime his seat in such Assembly shall thereby become vacant.

3

The same applies in Queensland and in fact across the whole of the Commonwealth of Australia. For 54 years there has been no elected person/s of the Company Administrating the Company as held to Memorandum of Understanding or the articles of association, but private persons Members of Registered Political Parties in the name of a foreign queen Elizabeth II, and using foreign currency Australian Dollars of a for all finance and trade, not elected into the Company to take any position or take or use the property of the Shareholders of the Company for private purposes and personal benefit .? The former Colonies now States of the Company all conducted, all the finance and trade in pounds, shillings and pence. With the introduction of the Coinage Act 1909, the coin of the realm was brought into circulation, whether it be a penny or a gold Sovereign, of the Crown made from the gold, silver that is held in the Royal treasury of the Crown, in the Commonwealth of Australia, the Royal Australian Mint. Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2 is the holder of all the land in the Commonwealth of Australia and the guarantor of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia and the current holder of the Partnership Act 1890, has the Currency of the Commonwealth issued through the Royal Australian Mint, the gold and silver reserve of the Company is held in the Royal Australian Mint, to ensure the Company the Commonwealth of Australia does not bankrupt, the elected Representatives of the shareholders, Administer the Company within the financial capability of the Company, to be able to pay its debts and remain solvent. I David John Walter, a single shareholder in the Company the Commonwealth of Australia, lay the following Criminal Complaint through the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia to Her Majesty the Queen, the owner of the gold and the silver held in the vaults of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Royal Australian Mint. In or about the years 1997 - or early 2002, private persons Members of Liberal Party of Australia holding a signed person to person Partnership Agreement with ELIZABETH II, in a private Corporation Headquarters of Parliament House of Australia opened in 1988 by the QUEEN of AUSTRALIA Elizabeth II, sold approximately 187 tonne (metric weight) of gold from the Royal Australian Mint, to pay outstanding debts of that private International Trading Corporation - The Australian Government however named, situated Parliament House - Parliament Dr, Canberra ACT 2600. The gold and the silver is not the private and the personal property of ELIZABETH II. The gold and the silver and the property of Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2 and held in Her Majesty’s Constructive Trust Her Will and Testament for her heirs and assigns, and the equerry of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia. I request Her Majesty the Queen to fully investigate and commence a full and total Criminal Investigation as to the sale of the gold. If there is any evidence, to support this Criminal allegation, those people are to be charged and tried under the Common law.

4

If possible, Her Majesty the Queen, to try and locate the current source of the gold where is being held, and attempt to have the gold returned back to the property of the Company, the Commonwealth of Australia, as held to Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). As far back as records show the owners of the land, the people that live, work, and do business on that land, there has always been Coin of the Realm, the ready money, to be exchanged to purchase property, real and personal and for people to be able trade and do commerce between them. In the United Kingdom, there has also been Coins of realm of another holder of the land, at time in history; the denarius of Julius Caesar, when England was under occupation by the Roman Empire. That leads to the Question what is the Coin of the realm here in the Commonwealth of Australia today, to allow the people to be able to conduct trade and commerce between themselves and do private business between one another. I have in my possession a Silver 50 cent Coin. ELIZABETH II AUSTRALIA 1966. The coin has the face of ELIZABETH II, with what appears to me to be a Crown on her head. The reverse of the Coin is engraved with a Coat of Arms with a kangaroo and an emu on either side of a shield with 6 individual Coats of Arms within that shield and under the shield the letters 50. This the very first Criminal offence that I place before the High Court of Australia, as held to the following Seal ELIZABETH II who has sealed the Seal of the Companies Act 1948. The Coin of the realm is of Elizabeth II. I refer to the attached STATEMENT OF CLAIM - Page 40 FINANCIAL AGREEMENT (DECIMAL CURRENCY) ACT. Act No. 39 Elizabeth 11 No. 39, 1966 – HOUSING. The act has no Seal of ELIZABETH II, document only the Housing can only be built on the land of ELIZABETH II. The Silver in the Coin of ELIZABETH II, is the property of Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2 as Her Majesty the Queen in this Petition Exhibited, holds the all the land, the gold, silver, helium and the petroleum in Constitution Act 1867 Qld. On the 14th February 1966, the Coin of the Realm of ELIZABETH II, was introduced to replace the Coin of the Realm of Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2, the Company the Commonwealth of Australia does not, trade or conduct any commerce in and Coin of the Realm of ELIZABETH II, the Commonwealth Bank of the People, cannot lend, deposit or give for commercial use of the Coin of ELIZABETH II, by the bank of the people in the Company under an act of the Company - COMMONWEALTH BANK. No. 18 of 1911An Act to provide for a Commonwealth Bank [Assented to 22nd December, 1911.] The very basis of the petition exhibited, is for the return of the Security of the Commonwealth of Australia, the petition itself is Criminal Complaint in the form of the

5

petition exhibited and that presented personally by myself David John Walter, and on behalf of the people, that I have tried to assist LIST OF COURT CASES & FURTHER PENDING MATTERS. The position of ELIZABETH II, came about by the Sealing of the COMPANIES ACT 1948 held to Statutory Instruments Act II & 12 GEO. 6. Companies Act:- -PART I. INCORPORATION OF COMPANIES AND MATTERS INCIDENTAL THERETO. Memorandum of Association. The Memorandum of Association is private partnership agreement signed and entered by all the Shareholders of the Company inside the PREAMBLE of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) as held to the Memorandum, of Understanding as held to THE ANNOTATED CONSTITUTION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH - QUICK & GARRAN.

[53 & 54 VICT] Partnership Act, 1890. [CH. 39.]

An Act to declare and amend the Law of Partnership. [14th August 1890.]

BE it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

ELIZABETH II

The Petition of Right [1627]

An Act declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crowne.

The Petition of Right [1627] 1627 CHAPTER 1 3 Cha 1

6

The Peticion Exhibited to His Majestie by the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Comons in this present Parliament assembled concerning divers Rights and Liberties ofthe Subjects: with the Kings Majesties Royall Aunswere thereunto in full Parliament.

No.1. [47 & 48 VICT.] Great Seal Act, 1884 [CH.30.]

An Act to simplify the passing of Instruments made under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom. [28th July 1884] BE it enacted by the Queen’s Most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in the present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows. I note the words “in the present Parliament” - Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2, sits in the Parliament of the people as person herself as Her Majesty the Queen holds all the land in the Queen’s, dominions the gold, silver, helium and the petroleum fount or under the land, as the speaker of the Parliament or the Chief Executive officer of the Company. Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2, is the current holder of the Partnership Act, 1890, and that holds of the people in the PREAMBLE of the Company in the Commonwealth of Australia, of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK), single shareholders. When the elected representatives of the people wish to, take money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund if the Company, and that applies across the whole of Commonwealth of Nations, that only form of Currency or money, in the Consolidated Revenue Funds, is pounds, shillings and pence. The preventative measure to stop the elected representatives of the shareholders from borrowing and using money of other private people or banks, in another form or name the, Euro or the Australian Dollar, they have to get direct permission from the shareholders by vote and by a majority. As a check and balance, before the money can be taken from the treasury or chancery there must be a warrant signed sealed dated and issued, under Her Majesty's Royal Sign Manual, countersigned by the Lord Chancellor...... etc The reason being Her Majesty the Queen is responsible to the shareholders to ensure that the company is not placed into bankruptcy by our elected representatives, which to me is Common Sense, and in every private organisation, Company or Corporation across the world you have check and balances in place. (i) in English:

Elizabeth II, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith[2]

7

(ii) in Latin:

Elizabeth II, Dei Gratia Britanniarum Regnorumque Suorum Ceterorum Regina, Consortionis Populorum Princeps, Fidei Defensor

[47 & 48 VICT.] Great Seal Act, 1884. [Cs. 30.]

CHAPTER 30. An Act to simplify the passing of Instruments under 'the A.D. 188 Great Seal of the United Kingdom. [28th July 1884.] BE it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows : 1. This Act may be cited as the Great Seal Act, 1884 2.-(1.) A warrant under. Her Majesty's Royal Sign Manual, countersigned by the Lord Chancellor, or by one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, or by the Lord High Treasurer, or two of the Commissioners of Her Majesty's Treasury, shall be a necessary and sufficient authority for passing any instrument under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, according to the tenor of such warrant; Provided that any instrument which may now be passed under the Great Seal by the flat or under the authority or directions of the Lord Chancellor or otherwise without passing through any other office may continue to be passed as heretofore. (2.) The Lord Chancellor may from time to time make, and when made revoke and vary, regulations respecting the passing of instruments under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, and the warrants for that purpose, and the preparation of such instruments and warrants, and every such warrant ' shall be prepared by the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery. I refer to introduction of Australian Decimal Currency on 14th February, 1966, which replaced the Legal tender pounds, shillings and pence by way:- FINANCIAL AGREEMENT (DECIMAL CURRENCY) Act No.39 1966 for HOUSING, in a signed Partnership Agreement commencing 1891, in the year of Our Lord 1891 inter alia [53 &54 VICT] Western Australia Constitution Act 1890 [CH 26] sealed to the Great Seal Act of 1888 alia Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). The Great Seal Act is sealed to the Partnership Act 1890, the introduction of any other Currency of ELIZABETH II, anywhere across the Queens dominions, lies totally in their shoulders, of those political parties, and their so called system of justice of ELIZABETH II, an the members of the Legal profession, judges and magistrates who are supposedly trained in the law, both the commercial or Company law and Criminal Law, with all due respect, has personally in the whole of Commonwealth of Australia, totally for their own, private benefit have let the people and the system of Common Law, allow every person is innocent until proved guilty by their peers, and their real, personal property held in trust their wills and testaments is totally secure.

8

Trusts (Hague Convention) Act 1991 Act No. 50 of 1991 This Act was prepared on 9 June 2004 Prepared by the Office of Legislative Drafting, Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra An Act to give effect to the Convention on the law applicable to trusts and on their recognition, and for related purposes 1 Short title [see Note 1] This Act may be cited as the Trusts (Hague Convention) Act 1991. 2 Commencement [see Note 1] (1) Subject to subsection (2), this Act commences on a day to be fixed by Proclamation, being a day not earlier than the day on which the Convention enters into force for Australia. (2) If this Act does not commence under subsection (1) within the period of 6 months beginning on the day on which the Convention enters into force for Australia, it commences on the first day after the end of that period. 3 Interpretation (1) In this Act: Convention means the Convention on the law applicable to trusts and on their recognition, done at The Hague on 1 July 1985, a copy of the English text of which is set out in the Schedule. (2) Unless the contrary intention appears, a word or expression has the same meaning in this Act as it has in the Convention. 4 Extension to external Territories This Act extends to the external Territories. Schedule—Convention on the law applicable to trusts and on their recognition—Subsection 3(1) The States signatory to the present Convention, Considering that the trust, as developed in courts of equity in common law jurisdictions and adopted with some modifications in other jurisdictions, is a unique legal institution, Desiring to establish common provisions on the law applicable to trusts and to deal with the most important issues concerning the recognition of trusts, Have resolved to conclude a Convention to this effect, and have agreed upon the following provisions— CHAPTER ONE—SCOPE Articles 1-5 CHAPTER II—APPLICABLE LAW Articles 6-10 CHAPTER III—RECOGNITION Articles 11-14 CHAPTER IV—GENERAL CLAUSES Articles 15-25 CHAPTER V—FINAL CLAUSES Articles 26-32 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention. DONE at The Hague, on the 1st day of July 1985, in English and French, both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy which shall be deposited in the archives of the

9

Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and of which a certified copy shall be sent, through diplomatic channels, to each of the States Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at the date of its Fifteenth Session. Notes to the Trusts (Hague Convention) Act 1991 Note 1 Act No. 50, 1991; assented to 24 April 1991; commenced 1 January 1992 (see Gazette 1991, No. GN49). Refer: Extracts from CHAPTER ONE—SCOPE—Article 2:- For the purposes of this Convention, the term ‘trust’ refers to the legal relationships created—inter vivos or on death—by a person, the settlor, when assets have been placed under the control of a trustee for the benefit of a beneficiary or for a specified purpose. A trust has the following characteristics— a) the assets constitute a separate fund and are not a part of the trustee’s own estate; © Commonwealth of Australia. I refer to the Seal on the Trusts (Hague Convention) Act 1991 Act No. 50 of 1991, the Seal of the Australian Government as Sealed to Australian Citizenship Act 1948, that Government consists of Members of Registered Political Parties only any the Seal does not recognise the Seal on the Great Seal Act 1884 or the Partnership Act, 1890. Any private persons who are employed and received any benefits or salaries from the profits of the firm, or who have private partnership agreements with an y person in the Australian Government which commenced trading in 1988, that private Australian business, does not recognise any private people, therefore they do not recognise the property of the people, that is regardless whether they live in the Commonwealth of Australia or elsewhere in the world. These private persons are not the elected representatives of the people in the Company the Commonwealth of Australia as held to Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK), and never have been commencing 1948.

No.1. [47 & 48 VICT.] Great Seal Act, 1884 [CH.30.]

An Act to simplify the passing of Instruments made under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom. [28th July 1884] (i) in English:

Elizabeth II, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith[2]

(ii) in Latin:

10

Elizabeth II, Dei Gratia Britanniarum Regnorumque Suorum Ceterorum Regina, Consortionis Populorum Princeps, Fidei Defensor

Royal Assent Act 1967 CH. 23 1

ELIZABETH II

1967 CHAPTER 23

An Act to amend the law relating to the signification of

Her Majesty's Royal Assent. [10th May 1967] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- 1.--(l) An Act of Parliament is duly enacted if Her Majesty's Assent thereto, being by Letters Patent under the Great Seal signed with Her Majesty's own hand,- (a) is pronounced in the presence of both Houses in the House of Lords in the form and manner customary before the passing of this Act; or (b) is notified to each House of Parliament, sitting separately, by the Speaker of that House or in the case of his absence by the person acting as such Speaker. (2) Nothing in this section affects the power of Her Majesty to declare Her Royal Assent in person in Parliament, or the manner in which an Act of Parliament is required to be endorsed in Her Majesty's name. 2.-(1) This Act may be cited as the Royal Assent Act 1967. (2) The Royal Assent by Commission Act 1541 is hereby repealed. PRINTED BY SIR PERCY FAULKNER, K.B.E., C.B. Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and Queen's Printer of Acts of Parliament I, refer to the manner and form - An Act to amend the law relating to the signification of Her Majesty's Royal Assent - Attorney - General (NSW) V Trethowan (1931) HCA 3 – 44 CLR BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:-

ELIZABETH II

European Communities

Act 1972

11

1972 CHAPTER 68 An Act to make provision in connection with the enlargement of the European Communities to include the United Kingdom, together with (for, certain purposes) the Channel Islands, the Isle of an and Gibraltar. [17th October 1972] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:-

COMPANIES ACT 1948 II & 12 Ceo. 6. Chapter 38

ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS.

PART I. INCORPORATION OF COMPANIES AND MATTERS

INCIDENTAL THERETO. An Act to consolidate the Companies Act, 1929, the Companies Act, (other than the provisions thereof relating to the registration of business names, bankruptcy and the prevention of fraud in connection with unit trusts), and certain other enactments amending the first-mentioned Act. [30th June 1948.]

II & 12 GEO. 6. Companies Act, 1948. CH. 38

CHAPTER 38. An Act to consolidate the Companies Act, 1929, the Companies Act, (other than the provisions thereof relating to the registration of business names, bankruptcy and the prevention of fraud in connection with unit trusts), and certain other enactments amending the first-mentioned Act. [30th June 1948.] BE it enacted by the King's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: —

PART I. INCORPORATION OF COMPANIES AND MATTERS

INCIDENTAL THERETO.

12

Memorandum of Association. 1.—(i) Any seven or more persons, or, where the company to be formed will be a private company, any two or more persons, associated for any lawful purpose may, by subscribing their names to a memorandum of association and otherwise complying with the requirements of this Act in respect of registration, form an incorporated company, with or without limited liability. (2) Such a company may be either— (a) a company having the liability of its members limited by the memorandum to the amount, if any, unpaid on the shares respectively held by them (in this Act termed a company limited by shares "); or (b) a company having the liability of its members limited by the memorandum to such amount as the members. I was born on the very land of this Nation, 19th October 1949, some 16 months after the very introduction of the COMPANIES ACT 1948, and sealed to the Australians Citizenship Act 1948. ELIZABETH 11 does not hold any citation law under the Corporations Act 2001 held by a member of the Liberal Party of Australia Scott Morrison MP the current holder of the Corporation Seal of Australia of ELIZABETH II only. ELIZABETH II does not own the land, in the PREAMBLE of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK), my birthright and real, personal property and money is held inside the Companies Act a 1948 and inside the PREAMBLE of the Constitution of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and held by Eliz 2. No private persons Members of Registered Political Parties inside the Constitutions of the Registered Political Parties and inside the PREAMBLE of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) can remove my birthright. Under Corporate Seal of ELIZABETH II, Seal the Australian Citizenship Act 1948, to turn myself into a Subject of ELIZABETH II, and a citizen of AUSTRALIA and and make me recognise totally ELIZABETH II, her church and bow down to the Law of ELIZABETH II, or the corporate laws of the political parties and their private Courts and own private members of the Australian Legal profession and the Public Servants. I will never bend to these people as long as I have breath in my body because they are not the elected representatives of the people of the company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) I recognise only Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2, I was born on Her Majesty’s Land and I swear and give my total allegiance and trust to Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2. I refer to the Seal on the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 –Australia Act 1986 -Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act (No. 1) 2002 No. 81, 2002: - 287B(1). 1 Subsection 287(1) - Insert: Liberal Party means the political party that, at the commencement of this definition, was registered under Part XI as the Liberal Party of Australia. Commencing from 1948 the only people that can vote under the Seal of Australian Citizenship Act 1948 as held to Australia Act 1986 and Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act 2002, are Members of the Liberal of Australia inside the PREAMBLE of

13

the DEED of the Constitutions of the Registered Political Parties of Australia, who all live and work and do business on the land of the land of the Crown for the past 72 years prior to my birth. All Acts Sealed to Seal of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 are held by the Current Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Government of ELIZABETH II, as Sealed to Corporations Act 2001, the Prime of Australia Mr. Scott Morrison MP a Member of the Liberal in New South Wales. The decision of the High Court of Australia – Sue v Hill [1999] HCA 30 (23 June 1999) set the perimeters of who were the only persons that vote to the Seal of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 – Members of the Liberal Part of Australia. The Judgments of the Judges of the High Court of Australia are not CITATIONS of a Corporation Court THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA. Sealed and signed and dated, by an employee of the firm, Australian Government paid from the profits of the firm in the currency of the firm, a private person, a Registrar so named holding the Seal of the Corporation and the authority of the Prime Mister of the Corporation to sign, sign, seal and date those CITATIONS of the firm, – they do not apply to myself and they never have done. Any CITATION of Corporate Australia which people believe are in fact the Judgments of the Judges High Court of Australia are totally incorrect and they cannot be bandied around like yesterday newspapers, to destroy the Constitution itself. The Members of the Australian Legal Profession commencing on Monday 14th February 1966 have charged for their Legal advice and any duties required of them to perform on behalf of any person in the Coin of the Realm of Elizabeth II. The Judges and Magistrates accepted in payment for their private services to the Liberal Party of Australia the Coin of the Realm of Elizabeth II, they all hold the authority of an individual. The Australian Courts have , had to Seal, The Petition of Right [1627] under a purported name, a purported title on a document only ELIZABETH II, as these people have done exactly the same as Charles 1 and Oliver Cromwell and others. To present this petition exhibited and the documents of evidence as attached, to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia inside the PREAMBLE of the Company the Commonwealth Constitution Act (UK) as am I and Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2 has been a very daunting task. In the presenting of this correspondence to your Honor to present to Her Majesty the Queen on my behalf and on behalf of Her Majesty’s subjects, that assist, it is the fact that is is most important. Not held to the substance of any forms or barriers placed in the way by ELIZABETH II, and her cohorts. I fear for my Country our Nation Australian, at these very troubled times, it includes monetary, political parties only trading digital money, figures that change every second and other pressing matters.

14

It is like Australia in a pressure cooker, how long will be before the whole System of Australian Government for Australian Citizens masterminded by the puppet masters, for the past 72 years blows this Nation into oblivion, leaving the people with nothing. I have been one the fortunate people that in my life I have been able work across Australia. I lived and worked in the Northern Territory of Australia for many years, and have lived in Queensland for a number of years. Australia is the most beautiful country on this planet earth, I will not stand by and let, a very select few people who for personal greed and avarice destroy this Nation, beyond redemption.

Australian Citizenship Act 1948 Act No. 83 of 1948 as amended

[Note: This Act was repealed by Act No. 21 of 2007 on 1 July 2007 For application and transitional provisions see Act No. 21, 2007, Schedule 3 (items 1–13)] This compilation was prepared on 1 July 2006 taking into account amendments up to Act No. 46 of 2006

An Act relating to Australian Citizenship RECOGNISING THAT:— Australian citizenship represents formal membership of the community of the Commonwealth of Australia; and Australian citizenship is a common bond, involving reciprocal rights and obligations, uniting all Australians, while respecting their diversity. Persons granted Australian citizenship enjoy these rights and undertake to accept these obligations, by pledging loyalty to Australia and its people, and by sharing their democratic beliefs, and by respecting their rights and liberties, and by upholding and obeying the laws of Australia: Part I—Preliminary 1 Short title [see Note 1] This Act may be cited as the Australian Citizenship Act 1948. 2 Commencement [see Note 1] This Act shall come into operation on a date to be fixed by Proclamation. 44 Transitional—subsection 23B(2) of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (1) This item applies to regulations if: (a) the regulations were made for the purposes of subsection 23B(2) of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948; and (b) the regulations were in force immediately before the commencement of this item.

15

(2) The regulations have effect, after the commencement of this item, as if they had been made for the purposes of subsection 23B(2) of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 as amended by this Schedule.

Australia Act 1986

Act No. 142 of 1985 An Act to bring constitutional arrangements affecting the Commonwealth and the States into conformity with the status of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation WHEREAS the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth and the Premiers of the States at conferences held in Canberra on 24 and 25 June 1982 and 21 June 1984 agreed on the taking of certain measures to bring constitutional arrangements affecting the Commonwealth and the States into conformity with the status of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation: AND WHEREAS in pursuance of paragraph 51 (xxxviii) of the Constitution the Parliaments of all the States have requested the Parliament of the Commonwealth to enact an Act in the terms of this Act:

BE IT THEREFORE ENACTED by the Queen, and………………

© Commonwealth of Australia

Prime Minister and Cabinet Legislation Amendment Act 1991

No. 199 of 1991 An Act to amend various Acts relating to matters dealt with within the portfolio of the Prime Minister, and for related purposes [Assented to 18 December 1991] The Parliament of Australia enacts: Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Prime Minister and Cabinet Legislation Amendment Act 1991. SCHEDULE 1 Section 3 AMENDMENTS OF ACTS Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981 Subsection 21(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of "authorised person"): Insert "or her" after "his". Subsection 21(5):Insert "or her" after "his". Special Prosecutors Act 1982 Subsection 17(3): Omit the subsection, substitute:

16

"(3) Where a Special Prosecutor employs or engages a person under this section, the terms and conditions of the person's employment or engagement are such as are from time to time determined by the Special Prosecutor.". [Minister's second reading speech made in- House of Representatives on 17 October 1991 Senate on 7 November 1991]

Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act (No. 1) 2002

No. 81, 2002 An Act to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, and for related purposes [Assented to 10 October 2002] The Parliament of Australia enacts: 1 Short title This Act may be cited as the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act (No. 1) 2002. 2 Commencement This Act commences on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent. 3 Schedule(s) Each Act that is specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this Act has effect according to its terms Schedule 1—Amendment of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 1AA Subsection 287(1) - Insert: designated federal party has the meaning given by subsection 287B(1). 1 Subsection 287(1) - Insert: Liberal Party means the political party that, at the commencement of this definition, was registered under Part XI as the Liberal Party of Australia. [Minister’s second reading speech made in— House of Representatives on 14 March 2002 Senate on 15 May 2002]

COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL. No. 19 of 1902.

An Act to regulate Parliamentary Elections.

[Assented to 10th October 1902.]

BE it enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:— The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) is the act of the business of the people, and all finance and trade can only be conducted as held to Section 52, in the Legal Currency of the Company Pounds shillings and pence, and that includes the Salaries of the employees of the Company, the Commonwealth Public Servants

17

The High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia is entrenched in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and the position of the Justices of the High Court, are entrenched in the – COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE 5 of 1902 Assented to 5th May 1902 – Section 3 – Unless otherwise expressly provided shall not apply to:- or any Justice of the High Court of Australia; or:- Refer -Attorney General (NSW) V Trethowan (1931) HCA 3 – 44 CLR. The Company the Commonwealth of Australia as held to Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK), hold no land, the land of the Six States of the Commonwealth are held by Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2, THE COMPANIES ACT of 1961 10 Eliz. 2 No. 55, and that land is held in Her Majesty’s Constructive Trust Her Majesty’s Will and Testament for Heirs and assigns. Her Majesty Queen is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England as held to Laws of God and held in the Partnership Act 1890 with the Holy Father FRANCIS as one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church across the Queen’s dominions. Her Majesty the Queen is also the current Holder of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld), the Constitution Act 1867 Qld, which lies in the shell of its act, since the 14th February 1966, as it has done along with the Constitution of the Company – the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). This is not a Constitutional issue, the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK),as held to the realm, aims and objects of the articles of association of the partners, of the Company, the Commonwealth of Australia, this is a total Criminal Complaint to be forwarded upon receipt of Her Majesty the Queen to have the security of the Commonwealth and the people returned as I will be requesting of Her Majesty the Queen. The Company was created at the request of our forefathers, as held to THE ANNOTATED CONSTITUTION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH - QUICK & GARRAN, the Memorandum, of Understanding or the articles of Association. The people of Western Australia were granted their own Constitution Act 1890 held to the Seal of the Partnership Act 1890 which currently held by Her Majesty the Queen. In 1890, the people of Western Australia were granted the Constitution Act 1890, then six independent colonies of people, with their own Parliaments and Governments conducting business in finance and trade across borders with the land mass known as Australia. As independent Colonies they were competing against each other on International Markets, and each Colony had to have its own Armed Forces of the Crown to protect the people and their property who, lived and worked on the land of the Crown in those Colonies from any invaders and other external forces etc. As a young boy growing up in Trundle in New South Wales, I knew the older men of the community who served in the Boer War in South Africa in the late 1890- in the New South Wales contingent. Each Colony had its own Legal tender and its own Coin of the Realm for that Colony, but always in pounds, shillings and pence. Queensland, I believe, had its own Treasury Building which is now a Casino?

18

Every person knows that a Country divided falls to the prey of others. It is in unity that we stand and when we stand as One, and it only ever takes one to stand, and they do stand alone, it is for very long. When they see and they know that the very fabric of our Constitution and the welfare of the people of this nation are standing on the very edge of the precipice of time, only a small push and the Nation will fall into the abyss. I refer to the Quote of Sir. John Downer on 1/3/1898, Sir John Downer knew that there more Carpetbaggers sitting on the sidelines that, one may say more than you could poke a stick at all scheming and plying their wares, their empty promises of future greatness of Australia, wealth for all, good times always, with twists and turns and empty promises, and upheld by their allies who they picked up along the way, who also fed off the money of the firm. The private allies, who have benefitted in any way, from their private positions upheld the Laws, of those Carpetbaggers, the Members of the Registered Political Parties inside the private Constitutions of the Registered Political Parties, held to the philosophies, and ideologies and policies of the Registered members of the Politics Parties inside the DEED of the Constitutions of those Political Parties, must remain inside the Constitution, as does every person in any private Organisation or Company or Corporation, across the Commonwealth of Australia, but in fact across the whole world, and those are as guilty as the principles. No person is above the Criminal law of any Nation, and that includes the Criminal Law of the Commonwealth of Australia as held to Crimes Act 1914. I refer to the words of Sir. John Downer, the man was very précis and far more eloquent with words than I am:- THE ANNOTATED CONSTITUTION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH - QUICK & GARRAN. Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER. I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be. END QUOTE I, David John Walter, in presenting signed and dated petition, as held The Petition of Right [1627] 1627 CHAPTER 1 3 Cha 1. I, David John Walter, present this Petition of Right to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia Justice Susan Kiefel AC, the only Common law Court in the whole of the Commonwealth of Nations.

19

Our forefathers knew very well that you had to keep the Judges of the High Court, safe from and free from any outside influence, regardless of what was happening, to uphold the very basis the fabric of the Company the right of the shareholder, which includes Her Majesty the Queen. I must give my total thanks and support totally to you Madam The Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia Justice Susan Kiefel AC, and every Member of the High Court past and present who, I believe for the last 54 years have never once yielded or given one Constitutional right of any shareholder to any Members of Registered Political Parties, sold out any shareholders of the Nation commencing 14th February 1966. I, David John Walter, also request of your Majesty the Queen, that your Majesty also be reciprocal, the Judges of the High Court could easily have walked away, and left us all the people with no law and no access to yourself as held to The Petition of Right [1627] 1627 CHAPTER 1 3 Cha 1. I will be seeking Orders of Your Majesty the Queen on the basis of the attached Petition Exhibited to this Petition Exhibit, plus other Orders. I will be requesting that your Majesty the Queen, personally appoint and swear in:- To personally appoint a person to fill the vacant position of the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia and hold the Letters Patent constitution the Office of the Governor-General 29 October (UK). To personally swear in and appoint a Governor to hold the Letters Patent erecting the Colony of Queensland 6 June 1859 (UK) to allow a Representative Government of the People to be Established as held to Constitution Act 1867 (Qld), which is also to include the reintroduction of the Legislative Council. I also respectfully Petition, your Majesty the Queen to personally swear in and appoint Chief Justice Susan Keifel, to be the Chief Justice of the High Court of Commonwealth Australia. I also request of your Majesty the Queen to allow the new Chief Justice of the High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia, to be able to refurbish the High Court with the Seals, which I believe is the Seal of the Habeas Corpus Act 1862. Any Seals of the so called HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA are to be removed, and not to be destroyed, but to keep as evidence if required. I also respectfully request your Majesty the Queen to swear in 6 other Judges of the High Court of Australia, to take their positions in the highest Court of the land. This will have to be done electronically at this point in time due to the restrictions, relating to the COVID-19 virus. I also respectfully request of your Majesty the Queen to allow the Chief Justice and the Judges of the High Court to able to purchase, and have the robes and the correct attire to wear when they sit in the highest position of any Court in the Commonwealth of Australia.

20

I request that the Judges of the High Court of Australia be remunerated out of the consolidated funds of the Commonwealth of Australia, but I will leave your Majesty the Queen and the Judges themselves to work your way through the problem, the Judges must be paid by the people. I also respectfully request of your Majesty the Queen to permit the Chief Justice of the High Court of Commonwealth of Australia the authority to employ Commonwealth Civil Servants as held to Commonwealth Public Service Act 1902. I respectfully request of your Majesty the Queen that you appoint Administrators of your choice to have this very serious problem confronting the people of the Commonwealth of Australia, to bring back to even keel. I have, your Majesty, spoken to the Office of Provost Marshall of the Australian Defence Force in Canberra the Officer of LT. COL Surtees, to try and ascertain whom/who they hold their allegiance to. The Sergeant, who I spoke to, would not give me his name only his rank, that allegiance of the members of the Provost Marshall of the Australian Defence Forces is to ELIZABETH II and the Prime Minister of Australia, Scott Morrison MP. I was of the firm belief that the Colonel on Chief of the Provost Marshall of the Commonwealth Defence Forces, as held to DEFENCE. No. 20 of 1903 is the Her Royal Highness, The Duchess of Cornwall ,the reply that I was given, it was once used for Ceremonial Matters but that is being phased out totally, by the Australian Government. The members of the three arms Australian Defence are loyal to the Members of the Corporation the Members of Registered Parties of the Australian Government, they recognise your Majesty the Queen as their Commander in Chief, this is going to create a very awkward situation, for all involved including we the people of the Commonwealth, we do not know which way the road leads. I will be requesting of your Majesty to have Members of the Defences Force who swear their allegiance to yourself only to remove the appointed representatives of the political parties from certain premises and remain on guard at those premises until, relieved by yourself. I request that your Majesty issue orders to have the private person appointed by the Members of the Registered Political Parties in the Government House in Canberra ,and the Governor in Government House in Brisbane, along with the Members of the Registered Parties of the Queensland Treasury Corporation taking up positions, inside the Parliament House of the People and the Members of the Queensland Judiciary and Staff, and the Members Legal Profession of Queensland, on the land of the Crown, inside the Court of the Crown Brisbane now named SUPREME COURT QUEENSLAND ELIZABETH II, to have every one of those people totally evicted forthwith and leave with personal property only. If any person resists they are to be removed with as much force as necessary. Your Majesty cannot use the Members of the Queensland Police Service as they have sworn their oaths of allegiance to ELIZABETH II and been paid out of the proceeds of the firm the Queensland Treasury Corporation.

21

This your Majesty bring a major problem, the Commonwealth of Australia has in fact been taken by over by Members of Political Parties, who have sworn their allegiance to a ‘foreign” Queen” Elizabeth II of a Foreign Nation AUSTRALIA and to become Australian Citizens as held to Australian Citizenship Act 1948, by the removal from the COMPANIES ACT 1948 -II & 12 Ceo. 6. Chapter 38 as held to Statutory Instruments Act PART I INCORPORATION OF COMPANIES AND MATTERS INCIDENTAL THERETO Memorandum of Association, and placing the name ELIZABETH II over the Seal. Memorandum of Association of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) is sealed the Public Seal, of as held to the Seal of the Australia Act 1948, which is currently held by the elected Chief Executive of the Australian Government and Member of a Registered Political Party the Liberal Party of Australia held inside Commonwealth Electoral Act 2002. Your Majesty has never granted any private person a Member of Registered Political and Letters Patent to fill the Officer of Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, commencing with Malcolm Frazer on 24 May 1976, Bob Hawke on 9 May 1988, John Howard on 5 March 1998 or Kevin Rudd on 11 March 2003.

You do not have to be a Constitutional expert to know something as simple as that. The absolute and total blasphemy and total contempt of the law of this nation, of the people, especially in Queensland, and the people who aided and abetted and conspired with them to uphold their private system of Justice commencing on 14 February 1966, as I will produce in evidence. To bring about the near total destruction of this State, and the very lives of the people that they have destroyed, of which many have even committed suicide, lost everything they owned, many people have had family breakups, bankruptcy, imprisonment, under the total authority of a Member of a Registered Political Party and upheld by the, Public Servants, the Judges and Members of the Legal Profession of this State, for at least 50 years, is disgrace to the Nation and the people who live in it. In the Statement of Claim that I have attached as evidence, I placed the decisions of the High Court of Australia, but told by a private person, who the signed the CITATION – JUSTICE HENRY, Queensland is Law unto itself it does not recognise any other laws, except the law of Queensland. Justice Henry signed it personally as private person, employee of the Queensland Treasury Corporation, and resides and lives on the land of the Crown inside the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld). Where therefore does Justice Henry a private person, a subject of the Crown obtain his full and total authority of ELIZABETH II, to fine or imprison, any one of the 5.11 million subjects of the Crown inside the Preamble of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) ?. That is the Criminal Law that people of Queensland live under, an have lived under since 14th February 1966, a total of 54 years, with no Courts of Common Law across the whole of Australia or in the United Kingdom Great Britain and Northern Ireland to appeal to, or the Privy Council.

22

I still cannot come to the terms that, in my lifetime that I would have to even consider presenting a Petition of Right to your Majesty the Queen through the Chief Justice of High Court of this Nation to return the security of the Commonwealth, itself, based on that signed Order of private person, who sits on the bench in Supreme Court Building in Cairns, the land of the Crown and sits under the Seal of the Queensland Treasury Corporation. Your Majesty, it is not going to be an easy task and many people will suffer the consequences, and are still suffering the consequences, of previous encounters with the Queensland Courts and the Queensland Legal system which is manipulated by the, Members of the Registered Political Parties of the Queensland Government, for their personal private benefit and gain, over and above the decisions of the High Court of this Nation. I refer to the Laws of God as held to the Church of England, I was baptised, confirmed and married in the Church of England, I never gave my right to be manipulated and fed false prophesies of ELIZABETH II, the moderator of the Anglican Church, which is a private International Trading Corporation with Elizabeth II, the heir an assign of Charles 1 as the Moderator. The Members of the Political Parties have signed contracts with Elizabeth II, to obtain what money, position, power and total obedience to be held by all and sundry and that obedience must also be held by your Majesty the Queen, along with the Holy Father FRANCIS. I could not imagine what happened when in many Nations; the Laws of God were replaced by a name on a blank document, to allow those who hold the total power and the authority use those Laws of God against the people and the Nation. Madam it even frightens me to write it so I will say no more. I request your Majesty that, in conjunction with the Holy Father FRANCIS, you return the Church England to its rightful place as one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. If any Anglican Clergy are in residence in any Church of England Church, they have to leave forthwith, as doctrine of the Laws of GOD of ELIZABETH II- money and power at all costs, regardless of the people and their property. I have also attached a Caveat to be signed sealed and served on the Prime Minister of Australia Mr. Scott Morrison MP, if you Madam the Chief Justices of the High Court cannot perform that duty, I respectfully that Her Majesty the Queen, sign seal and date the Caveat and have it Registered and Served as requested. I also request a signed and sealed copy of the Caveat. I have also in the attached Petition Exhibited, sought further and better Orders of you Madam the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, I respectfully request Madam, that grant to me that relief.

23

-Short précis of fact:- On the 14th February, 1966 the elected and sworn Members of the Legislative Assembly in the 6 States of the Commonwealth of Australia, in the elected Executive Governments of the Company which included the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia, and Member of the Australian Liberal Party, being the elected Executive Officers the Premiers of the 6 States of the Company the Commonwealth of entered into private partnership agreement with FINANCIAL AGREEMENT (DECIMAL CURRENCY) Act No. 39 1966 with ELIZABETH 11 and having the Act Assented to on 29 September 1966- HOUSING. - Holds no Seal of any Company, Corporation, or private organisation of ELIZABETH II. On the 14th February 1966, as private persons, and inside the private constitutions of the Registered Political Parties commenced trading in Australian Decimal Currency of ELIZABETH II as held to the Currency Act 1965, and removed the Legal tender of the Company, pounds, shillings from circulation, with no referendum, of the shareholders of the Company. The Governor-General who is personally sworn an appointed by Her Majesty the Queen Eliz. 2 and holds the Letters Patent consisting the Officer of the Governor-General 29th

October 1900 (UK). Her Majesty the Queen the current holder of the land in the six States of the Commonwealth of Australia sits in the House Representatives as the Speaker of the House, to resume her seat. All money Bills, to be able to take the money from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Shareholders inside the PREAMBLE of the Company, must first present those accounts for payment to the Governor-General, holding the Letters Patent consisting the Officer of the Governor-General 29 October 1900 (UK), to ensure that the money is there, as final check and balance, the Company the people will not go into Bankruptcy as held to Partnership Act 1890 as any other Company formed on the land of the Crown. Since the 14th February 1966, no Governor-General personally sworn and appointed by the Queen, has been able to take any legal tender pounds, shillings and pence from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Company, to pay the employees of the Company as held to COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC SERVICE. No. 5 of 1902 which includes the Governor-General.

[63 & 64 VICT.] Commonwealth of Australia [CH. 12.] Constitution Act.

3. There shall be payable to the Queen out of the Consolidated Revenue fund of the Commonwealth, for the salary of the Governor-General, annual sum which, until the Parliament otherwise provides, shall be ten thousand pounds. The salary of a Governor-General shall not be altered during his continuance in office.

24

44. Any person who- (i.) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power: or shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives. The Members of the Registered Political Party the Liberal Party of Australia who were elected into the Company by the shareholders of the age of 21 years, and whilst elected being the representatives of the Company, signed and entered into private contracts with a foreign Queen of a foreign Nation AUSTRALIA, and commenced trading in that ‘foreign currency’ The Australian Dollar of ELIZABETH II. (i.) Is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power: or shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives. I Note:- 44 Any person who......... shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives. The Parliament House of the people, the business, the Company, and the Commonwealth Bank closed their doors for business on the 14th February 1966, to all and sundry. In 1974, Governor-General Sir John Kerr holding the Letters Patent consisting the Officer of the Governor-General 29 October 1900 (UK), left that position and failed to return the Letters Patent consisting the Officer of the Governor-General 29 October 1900 (UK), to Her Majesty the Queen to re-appoint and new Governor-General to allow Representative Government of the shareholders of the Company to continue, to trade and do business worldwide. The basis of this Petition of Right [1627] CHAPTER 1 3 Cha1 that Her Majesty the Queen swear in and appoint a Governor General of her choice to hold The Letters Patent to allow a representative government of the people with the Queen in the House of Representatives in the House as the Speaker to re-establish and do all trade and commerce as held to section 52 of the Constitution at common law. Australian Government is a private organisation which consists of Members of Registered Political Parties only, and held to their very own Electoral Act of 2002 -Insert: Liberal Party means the political party that, at the commencement of this definition, was registered under Part XI as the Liberal Party of Australia, their private authority of the people and the assets of the people held in the Constitutions of the 6 States of the Commonwealth of Australia is Nil, the same as any other private person, Company, Corporation or Organisation, worldwide. The employees and the Courts of the Australian Government hold authority only to the Workplace Laws of the Australian Government as they are an International Trading Corporation, and trading in International Currency, and their employs and agents are held to International Law of Trade Unions.

25

Her Majesty the Queen holds the Constitutions of the Six States of the Commonwealth of Australia, personally and the land, the assets found on the land, or under the land of the people, inside those Constitutions, which included Her Majesty the Queen as the landholder. The land and the equity of the people were never to be collateral for the Company which commenced trading on Tuesday 1st January 1901, as held to Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). The representatives of the Company received their equity from income tax which can only to be paid in the legal tender of the Company pounds, shillings and pence. Since the 14th February, no private person of the Company has had to pay Income Tax to a “foreign Queen” Elizabeth II, in any foreign currency of a private organisation also being a private business, themselves being private persons, members of registered political parties inside the preamble of the deed of the company, The Commonwealth of Australia to enter into private contracts with a foreign queen ELIZABETH II as a private international trading corporation to defeat the Company of the Commonwealth of Australia over and above the Trade Practices Act of the company. The people of the Company, the shareholders, could not pay the salaries and allowances to the Public Servants of the Commonwealth, who are paid from the profits of the business, the Commonwealth of Australia, as held to Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). No private persons employed by the Members of the Australian Government commencing 1970 as held to Currency Act 1965 inter alia Parliamentary Counsel Act 1970 Act No. 8 of 1970 as amended can conduct any finance and trade on behalf of the Company as held to Section 52 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). The Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) has lain in the Shell of its Act since 1970, the Members of the Political Parties in Queensland hold the authority of an individual inside the PREAMBLE of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) as do their employees and agents, and the judges of the private courts of the political parties only. This includes Criminal Law. Her Majesty the Queen is the current holder of the land inside the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) and the Land Act 1962. The Queen as the holder of the land also holds the Separation of powers between Church and State. The Queen must appoint a Governor of Queensland held to Letters Patent erecting The Colony of Queensland 6 June 1859 (UK), to allow a Representative Government of Members of the Legislative Assembly with the Queen in the Legislative Assembly as the speaker, and the Legislative Council. I refer to the:- Order-in-Council establishing Representative Government in Queensland 6 June 1859 (UK) ORDER IN COUNCIL empowering the Governor of Queensland to make Laws and to provide for the Administration of Justice in the said Colony.

26

Civil List £

Governor 2,300.00 Private Secretary 300.00 Colonial Secretary 700.00 Treasurer 700.00 Judge 1,200.00 Public Worship 1,000.00 Total £6,400.00 The Treasurer is the Person holding the position as the Treasurer in the Legislative Assembly Act 1867 as held to Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) - Revenue. The Treasurer of the Legislative Assembly must have access to the Consolidated Revenue Fund inside the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) in pounds, shillings and pence to pay the Governor and an elected Judge of the Supreme Court their Salaries and Allowances. On the 14th February 1966, the Members of the elected Political Parties in Queensland holding a signed Partnership Agreement with Elizabeth II, commenced trading in Australian Decimal Currency and all the land held by Her Majesty the Queen was taken from the Land Act 1962 and placed in the possession of Elizabeth II, contrary to the terms and conditions of the Louisiana Purchase, to be a private asset of the Members of the Political Parties only, and remains in place some 54 years later. The Governor and the Judge’s cannot serve 2 Masters Elizabeth II and Elizabeth 2 – The Judges made their choice at 10am on the morning of Monday 14th February 1966, when the very first person that was brought before them in a Court of Law of ELIZABETH II, and fined that person in Australian Decimal Currency of Elizabeth II, or imprisoned that person under the law of Elizabeth II, from that time every CITATION of ELIZABETH II. it is beyond the power as held to the Constitution Act, it is invalid ab initio.’ All land has been sold by the Members of the Registered Political Parties private people living on the land of the Crown and operating a private business, in Queensland and single shareholders in the PREAMBLE the DEED of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld), land is sold in metric measurements and in Australian Decimal Currency. That Currency is foreign to the Legal tender of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) pounds, shillings and pence, therefore it cannot be banked into and Australian Bank outside of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) and held in the Queensland Treasury, along with the gold and silver, the property of the Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2. No Member of the Judiciary, be they a Judge or Magistrate who have accepted payment in Australian Decimal Currency or otherwise commencing 14th February 1966, and not elected by the Legislative Assembly with Her Majesty the Queen as the Chief Executive Officer and sworn in by the Governor of Queensland who hold the Seals of the Supreme Court as held to Supreme Court Act 1921, has any authority of the crown. The Treasurer being a Member of Registered Political Party, has no access to the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the people of Queensland, pounds, shillings and pence, to

27

be able to pay and the Governor holding the Letters Patent erecting the Colony of Queensland 6th June 1859 (UK), or any elected Judge of Supreme Court of Queensland to hold the Seals of the Court for the administration of Justice on the land of the Crown inside the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld). Commencing 14th February 1966, no Governor, whether appointed by Her Majesty Queen or not, is paid from the Consolidated Fund of the Shareholders on inside the PREAMBLE of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld).The Governor holds only the authority of an individual, as ELIZABETH II recognises no people of the Commonwealth of Australia in the PREAMBLE of the Constitution itself. Any Judge of any Queensland Court that has accepted payment in Australian Decimal Currency, or other Currency, from the Members of the Registered Political Parties, inside the Constitutions of the Registered Political Parties, holding only the authority of an elected Member, does not hold the authority of the people or of the crown to fine in Decimal Currency or imprison any person. They hold private authority only. I am asking the Queen to quash all those records since 1966 Elizabeth II upheld by private people on behalf of the members of political parties in the parliament house of the people, and in the courts of the crown, now being courts of ELIZABETH II, appointed by a private person the Premier of Queensland Annastacia Palaszczuk MP who is a member of a registered political party only, and holds the public seal of the Queensland treasury corporation Act 1988 I, not being a shareholder or receiving any benefits of the Queensland Treasury Corporation as held to my very first exhibit: Statement of Claim, I cannot vote not being a member of a registered political party inside the electoral act 1992, I cannot not cast any vote to have a member of a registered political party, inside the private constitutions of the registered political parties, to take up any positions as the chief executive officer of the Queensland Treasury Corporation which is an international Trading corporation based in the capital of Queensland, Brisbane All operations of the Treasury Corporation are conducted on the land of the crown Her Majesty the Queen the current holder of the Constitution Act Queensland 1867. The Law of the Land is the Common Law of England and no persons who hold signed partnership agreements with the Premier, paid out of the profits of the firm are exempt from the criminal laws of justice as applied to the constitution Act 1867 I refer to the Legislative Assembly Act 1867, which was the very first Act and made to create the representatives of the people with the Queen in the Legislative Assembly as the speaker. I David John Walter, respectfully request that either the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, or Her Majesty the Queen, to quash and strike from the record, every decision or Judgment or Order of any private Queensland Court immediately commencing 14th February 1966.

An Act to consolidate certain Laws relating to

The Legislative Assembly [ASSENTED TO 28TH DECEMBER 1867.]

WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate certain laws relating to the Legislative Assembly

28

Be it enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly of Queensland in Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows-- Interpretation. 1. In the interpretation of this Act the following words in inverted commas shall have the meaning set against them respectively unless inconsistent with or repugnant to the context- "Assembly "-The Legislative Assembly of Queensland "Speaker"-The Speaker of the Assembly for the time being "Election' '-The election of any member of the Assembly. Disqualification and Resignation. *4 to 6. 7. If any member of the Assembly shall for one whole session of the Legislaturewithout the permission of the Assembly entered upon its journalsfail to give hisattendance in the said House or shall take any oath or make declaration or acknowledgment of allegiance obedience or adherence to any foreign prince or power or do or concur in or adopt any act whereby he may become a subject or citizen of any foreign state or power or become entitled to the rights privileges or immunities of a subject of any foreign state or power or shall become bankrupt or an insolvent debtor within the meaning of the laws in force within the said colony relating to bankrupts or insolvent debtors or shall become a public contractor or defaulter or be attainted of treason or be convicted of felony or any infamous crime his seat in such Assembly shall thereby become vacant. On the 14th February 1966, Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2 in the Legislative Assembly refused to pass any alteration or change in the currency the Legal tender of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld), from pounds, shillings and pence to Australian Decimal Currency, the Australian Dollars of ELIZABETH II. The members of the Registered Political Parties held in signed person to person contracts with ach other and already holding a partnership agreement with ELIZABETH II, and swearing their oaths of allegiance to be Australian Citizens, as held to Public Seal of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948, commenced trading in Australian Decimal Currency on Monday 14th February 1966. The positions, of the Members of the Registered Political Parties swearing their oaths of allegiance to ELIZABETH II, to be Australian Citizens, outside of COMPANIES ACT 1948 II & 12 Ceo. 6. Chapter 38, could not sit in the Legislative Assembly. The members of the Registered Political Parties, should have vacated their seats in the Legislation immediately, and they refused to sign and give their resignations to the speaker Her Majesty the Queen the holder of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld)

COMMONWEALTH BANK.

No. 18 of 1911. An Act to provide for a Commonwealth Bank.

[Assented to 22nd December, 1911.]

29

BE it enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows :— PART I.—PRELIMINARY. 1. This Act may be cited as the Commonwealth Bank Act 1911. 2. This Act shall commence on a day to be fixed by proclamation. I refer to the COMMONWEALTH BANK No.18 of 1911, the bank of the people, as shareholder in the PREAMBLE of the Company , Her Majesty the Queen holding the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) as held to Clauses 1-9 Sections 61,109,117 & 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK), refused to pass and allow the introduction of Australian Decimal Currency in Queensland. - An Act Relating to and Consequent on the Introduction in Australia of Decimal Currency [ASSENTED TO 23RD DECEMBER, 1965] Commencing:- Monday 14th February 1966, the Governor holding the Letters Patent erecting Colony of Queensland 6 June 1859 (UK), could not authorise any private person a Member of a Registered Political Party a personal Representative of ELIZABETH II, and an Australian Citizen inside the Australian Citizenships Act 1948 and outside of the COMPANIES ACT 1948, to have any access, to the Legal tender inside the Constitution Act 1867 Qld, to pay any private Queensland , Public Servants no longer employees of Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2, for the past 54 years. In Queensland there is no law of the Crown, there is no law of the people, no laws of God – but the law of ELIZABETH II, upheld by members of Registered Political Parties inside the private Constitutions of the registered political parties holding the authority of an individual registered Member. For the past 54 years, no income of the Members of the Registered Political Parities could be banked in the bank of the shareholders COMMONWEALTH BANK. Where is the money expended and received for the past 54 years, the property of the people.

ANNO QUARTO DECIMO

ELIZABETHAE SECUNDAE REGINAE No. 61 of 1965

An Act Relating to and Consequent on the Introduction in Australia of Decimal Currency [ASSENTED TO 23RD DECEMBER, 1965] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same as follows:- 1. (1) Short title This Act may be cited as " The Decimal Currency Act of 1965.- (2) Commencement. Except as herein otherwise provided, this Act shall come into operation on the fourteenth day of February one thousand nine hundred and sixty-six.

30

I, refer to the Enacting Manner and Form - BE IT ENACTED - An Act Relating to and Consequent on the Introduction in Australia of Decimal Currency, as held to Attorney General (NSW) V Trethowan (1931) HCA 3 – 44 CLR . The private introduction of Australian Decimal Currency a s (Statutory Currency) - it is beyond the power as held to the Constitution Act, it is invalid ab initio. In Queensland, Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2 as the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly and the holder of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) refused to allow for the introduction of Australian Decimal Currency to Legal tender of Constitution Act 1867. Leask v Commonwealth [1996] HCA 29 (5 November 1996) (1996) 187 CLR 579 (1996) 140 ALR 1; (1996) 70 ALJR 9

ANNO VICESIMO PRIMO

ELIZABETHAE SECUNDAE REGINAE

No. 31 of 1972 An Act to take account of the adoption of units of the metric system of measurement as legal units of measurement of the Commonwealth ; to amend specified Acts in certain particulars; to provide for the construction of references to measurement of physical quantities and other references in Acts and instruments and for related purposes. [ASSENTED To 21ST DECEMBER, 1972] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- PART I-PRELIMINARY 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Metric Conversion Act 1972. I, refer to the Enacting Manner and Form - BE IT ENACTED - An Act Relating to and Consequent on the Introduction in Australia of Decimal Currency, as held to Attorney General (NSW) V Trethowan (1931) HCA 3 – 44 CLR . In Queensland, Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2 as the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly and the holder of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) refused to allow for the ELIZABETH II, to granted the land held by Her Majesty the Queen in Imperial measurements to become the real property of Elizabeth II, which includes all the gold, silver, helium, and petroleum, to be able to be sold and financial return and gain, from the sales, placed in the coffers of the political parties, the be an asset for the Members of the Registered Political Parties in the State of Queensland, for past 48 years, as applies today.

31

Queensland

Property Law Act 1974 Current as at 25 May 2020

© State of Queensland 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 181 Power to modify or extinguish easements and restrictive covenants (1) Where land is subject to an easement or to a restriction arising under covenant or otherwise as to the user of the land, the court may from time to time, on the application of any person interested in the land, by order modify or wholly or partially extinguish the easement or restriction upon being satisfied— (a) that because of change in the user of any land having the benefit of the easement or restriction, or in the character of the neighbourhood or other circumstances of the case which the court may deem material, the easement or restriction ought to be deemed obsolete; or (b) that the continued existence of the easement or restriction would impede some reasonable user of the land subject to the easement or restriction, or that the easement or restriction, in impeding that user, either— (i) does not secure to persons entitled to the benefit of it any practical benefits of substantial value, utility, or advantage to them; or (ii) is contrary to the public interest; and that money will be an adequate compensation for the loss or disadvantage (if any) which any such person will suffer from the extinguishment or modification;

Queensland

Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 Current as at 12 July 2019

© State of Queensland 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Entity name: DEPT OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL ABN status: Active from 01 Nov 1999 Entity type: State Government Entity Trading name(s): DEPT OF JUSTICE & ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN LAW Business name(s) MINA COLLECTION The Great Bigfoot Business details for ‘MINA COLLECTION’ – Holder Name: RINA MAWARDI Holder Type: Person ABN: 13 846 673 994 2/12 Randall St, Slacks Creek Qld 4127 Manufacturer of wholesale clothing ABN Lookup Current details for ABN 36 657 147 808 Entity name: WEIR, THERESA MARGARET

32

Entity type: Individual/Sole Trader Historical details: Entity name WEIR, THERESA MARGARET From 26 Oct 2010 (current) Entity name: NOONE, THERESA ASIC Register Business name: The Great Bigfoot Holder name: Theresa Noone Holder Type: Person ABN: 36 657 147 808 Shoe sales – Manunda, Queensland

Queensland

Legal Profession Act 2007 Current as at 25 May 2020

© State of Queensland 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Burns v State of Queensland & Croton [2006] QCA 235 PARTIES: CATHERINE ELIZABETH BURNS (applicant/appellant) V STATE OF QUEENSLAND & LUKE CROTON (respondent/respondent) FILE NO/S: Appeal No 526 of 2006 SC No 515 of 2004 The application below [10] Other steps were taken on behalf of Mrs Burns, in addition to the appeal filed in this Court from the decision of the P & E Court. On 12 November 2004 an application, signed by Mr Walter as Mrs Burns’ agent, was filed in the Cairns Registry of the Supreme Court in which Mr Walter asked for various declarations to be made, and by paragraph 9 of that application for an order under s 181 of the Property Law Act 1974 (Qld): “…extinguishing or otherwise holding the restrictions placed upon the freehold land of Catherine Elizabeth Burns to be invalid and without force, because they were not reserved to the State of Queensland at the time of sale, and Mrs Burns has indefeasible title, under section 169 Land Titles Act 1994.” [11] That application was the one heard by de Jersey CJ on 15 November 2004.11 In the course of argument before the Chief Justice, Mr Fitzgibbon of counsel, who appeared for Mrs Burns, and who described Mr Walter as having done an incredible amount of work on the matter,12 gave an undertaking to the court that the appeal from the decision of the P & E Court would be abandoned forthwith.13 The Chief Justice had sought that undertaking, because the matters raised in the argument before him were substantially the

33

same as those contended for in the Notice of Appeal to this Court in Appeal Number 7419 of 2004. The decision now challenged [12] The Chief Justice gave his decision on 19 November 2004, and that is the decision from which Mrs Burns seeks an extension of time in which to appeal. The judgment records that the paragraphs numbered 1 to 8 of the application heard by the Chief Justice covered a number of matters which, though disparate, came down to a challenge to the State’s legislative power to impose the requirement that, before clearing native vegetation from her land, Mrs Burns first obtain a development permit to do that. The Chief Justice held that that issue had been decided against Mrs Burns in Bone v Mothershaw [2003] 2 Qd R 60014, as Mr Walter recognised in various of the written submissions he filed in this Court on this application. [13] Section 181 of the Property Law Act gives this Court power to modify or extinguish a “restriction arising under covenant or otherwise as to the user” of land. In Bone v Mothershaw McPherson JA wrote that a (local) law that prohibited the destruction of vegetation on specified land was not a law that directly determined the use that might be made of the land. Such a law took the vegetation on the land exactly as it found it, and sought to maintain the land in that condition. However such a prohibition might indirectly limit other uses to which the land might be put, it was not a development or change of use of that land that was within the conventional or defined meaning of that word under the IPA or earlier legislation in that tradition. The Chief Justice took the same approach in his reasons on the s 181 application in the judgment sought to be appealed, describing the provisions of the VMA as ones which did not impose a restriction on the “use” of the land, but rather related to a proposed change in its character or presentation. I respectfully agree, although not persuaded to agree with his further observation, that the restriction on presentation burdened the owner and not the land. A development approval is not personal to the individual applicant who obtains it, but applies to the land, and binds the owner, the owner’s successors in title, and any occupier of the land.15 [14] The Chief Justice accordingly upheld a cross-application filed by the State of Queensland, that her application (originally filed on 25 October 2004) be dismissed. Subsequently the Chief Justice ordered on 8 December 2004 that Mrs Burns pay the costs of the State of Queensland of and incidental to her originating application, including the State’s costs of its application to strike out her originating application, such costs to be assessed on the standard basis. Mr Walter’s undoubtedly well intentioned and considerable efforts on Mrs Burns’ behalf have cost her money. On the 29th April 1997 Hon R.E.BORBIDGE (Surfers Paradise – Premier) holding a signed person to person contract with Prime Mister of Australia John Howard MP a elected Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Liberal Party of the “Australian Government” a private Australian Business trading electronic Currency only or bitcoin for all E-Commerce. The Appointment of Governor of Queensland – Major General Peter Arnison AO Hansard Queensland Legislative Assembly – 29 April 1997 – Extracts [1009] & [1010] MINISTERIAL STATEMENT Swearing in of Governor Hon R.E. BORBIDGE (Surfers Paradise – Premier (9.36am) by leave.

34

I wish to inform the House that Major General Peter Arnison AO, will be sworn in as the 23rd Governor of Queensland this afternoon of 29th July 1997. The swearing in ceremony will take place at Parliament House on the Speakers Lawn. Members and their spouses or partners will be invited to the swearing in ceremony. Major General Peter Arnison appointment was approved by Her Majesty the Queen on 19 March and announced on 22 April when the Public Seal of the State was affixed to Her Majesty’s Commission by the Governor in Council. Hon R.E.BORBIDGE (Surfers Paradise – Premier) In 29th April 1977 the elected and sworn Members of the Legislative Assembly inside the Constitution Act 1867 gave authority to Hon R.E.BORBIDGE (Surfers Paradise – Premier) Major General Peter Arnison accepted a position to be the Governor of the State of Queensland inside the Constitution Queensland 2001 at Chapter 3 Governor and Executive Government and held in a Partnership Agreement with the defendant as held to Partnership Act 1891 Reprint 2C © State of Queensland 2009. Major General Peter Arnison appointment was approved by Her Majesty the Queen on 19 March and announced on 22 April when the Public Seal of the State was affixed to Her Majesty’s Commission by the Governor in Council. I Note the two dates ‘19 March’ – ‘22 April’ - There are no such dates in the Gregorian Calendar

Queensland

LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ACT 1867 Reprinted as in force on 27 August 1999

(includes amendments up to Act No. 21 of 1999)

Reprint No. 2A This reprint is prepared by

the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel Warning—This reprint is not an authorised copy

LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ACT 1867 [as amended by all amendments that commenced on or before 27 August 1999] An Act to consolidate certain laws relating to the Legislative Assembly Preamble WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate certain laws relating to the Legislative Assembly. †PART 1—PRELIMINARY ˙Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Legislative Assembly Act 1867.

35

˙Definitions2. In this Act— “Assembly” means the Legislative Assembly. “election” means the election of a member of the Assembly. †PART 2—COMPOSITION OF THE ASSEMBLY ˙Number of members of Assembly 3. The Assembly is to consist of 89 members. ˙One member for each electoral district 4. Each member is to represent 1 of the 89 electoral districts provided for in the Electoral Act 1992. 4 Table of earlier reprints TABLE OF EARLIER REPRINTS [If a reprint number includes a roman letter, the reprint was released in unauthorised, electronic form only.] 6 List of legislation Legislative Assembly Act 1867 31 Vic No. 21 date of assent 28 December 1867 commenced 31 December 1867 (see s 37) Note—This Act contains provisions relocated from the Criminal Code [1899]. A list of legislation for the relocated provisions of the Criminal Code appears below. as amended by— Officials in Parliament Act 1884 48 Vic No. 29 s 7 sch date of assent 23 December 1884 commenced on date of assent Elections Tribunal Act 1886 50 Vic No. 7 s 3 sch date of assent 14 September 1886 commenced 2 December 1886 Parliamentary Members (Office of Profit) Amendment Act 1999 No. 21 pts 1–2 date of assent 30 April 1999 commenced on date of assent

© State of Queensland 1999 On the 14th February 1966 the members of political parties held in a partnership agreement with each other in Queensland and without the permission of the legislative assembly, or with the Queen in the Legislative Assembly commenced all commerce and trade in the Decimal Currency of ELIZABETH and as held to section 7 “Disqualification and Resignation”. After swearing allegiance to a foreign queen or power and becoming entitled to their rights their positions in that Legislative Assembly became vacant. Since the 14th February 1966 the Legislative Assembly has had no authority. Queensland, has been without law since 1966 and has been at the mercy of individuals. The Constitution Act is sealed so does not apply, the seal does not have a date Not having legal tender there can be no business contracted in Queensland since February 1966. To the Chief Justice I have requested certain orders of the Chief Justice to be added inside for Her Honour to deal with as she comes to them to sign them and to issue writs as appropriate. As a shareholder in the company and charged with the business of the company by the shareholders, some 25 million of us, those private shareholders, being members of registered Political Parties, shareholders inside the private constitutions of the Political Parties and held to the aims and objects of those Political Parties and held to the articles

36

of association of those private organisations, upon being elected into the company of the people of the Commonwealth of Australia of which they bare only the authority of single shareholders sign private and personal partnership agreements with a foreign Queen ELIZABETH II of a foreign Nation known as AUSTRALIA and swore their oath of allegiance to that foreign Queen and have maintained that persona for 54 years. That persona ends today. The Commonwealth of Australia is a company, and as a company we areinside the Partnership Act 1890 and that act is sealed with the identical seal as the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act UK itself. Any private seals of the registered political parties that commenced trading on the 9th May 1988 with the building of a private (Parliament) House in Canberra and opened by one of their members, Mr. Bob Hawke MP and Elizabeth11 do not apply to the people of the company of the Commonwealth of Australia, and here iswhy: Her Majesty the Queen did not grant any Letters Patent to a private person inside the preamble of the constitution of the company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act UK, Mr. Bob Hawke MP, to fill the vacancy left by Sir John Kerr 1974. Regardless of what these private people call themselves or the purported positions they appoint themselves within the Commonwealth, within the 6 states of the Commonwealth they are held to the law of criminal responsibility as is every other person including then Queen herself is subject to the law in those states, and ignorance of the law is no excuse As your Honour the Chief Justice will note these are far more than constitutional issues as the constitutions have lain in the shells of their acts, and this petition will be asking Her Majesty to recommission the constitution and other further orders as given on the exhibit petition. The loss of real and personal property, and every individual right of the people of this great commonwealth will never be able to be rectified nor all property returned, such is the extent of the damage done. The High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia does not make citations but makes judgements based on the law of God, which was handed to Moses, the Ten Commandments. I am not here for to attempt to explain the actions of these people, and in particular the members of the legal profession and the courts, and those entrusted with the Laws of God as held tothe One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church across the length and breadth of the Commonwealth of Nations. The people, which includes the crown, have no law and are at the mercy of members of the political parties who have risen above every law of humanity and right and created a fantasy which is no more than a thin veil and is upheld by courts of those private people. Your Honour will note that I have attached a list of people which I have attempted to help obtain their rights and the return of their property, all of which failed under Australian Law, There is no Australian Law of ELIZABETH II, the Members of the Registered Political Parties and their Courts and their employees and agents, all who have aided and abetted the total demise of the Commonwealth of Australia. They are not above the Laws of the Constitution, of this Nation, they are held to the Criminal law of the Commonwealth as held to Crimes Act 1914, as would anyone else.

37

Those in Queensland that have sealed the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) and the Legislative Assembly and I 1988, over and above the authority oh Her Majesty the Queen the Speaker in the Legislative Assembly, as held to accountable for their private actions under the Criminal Code 1867. The Queensland Treasury Corporation has no currency act of its own, so consequently it can have no bankruptcy act of its own. And having no currency act of its own how does it pay the employees of the corporation. Commencing on the 6th June 2001, a private person inside the preamble of the Constitution Act 1867 Qld), known as Premier Peter Beattie MP of Queensland the Smart State personal holder of the public seal of the Queensland Government Department of Premier and Cabinet employs private people to collect private revenue on his behalf of the Queensland Government Department of Premier and Cabinet in an electronic currency only. Premier Peter Beattie MP of Queensland the Smart State is a private Australian Business operating in Queensland, is the current holder of the Public seal of the Queensland Government Department of Premier and Cabinet Education Queensland. Queensland Government Department of Premier and Cabinet Education Queensland is privately owned and operated business of the Premier Peter Beattie MP .

Queensland’s Constitution The Constitution of Queensland 2001 annotated section by section for easier understanding

Queensland the Smart State

© The State of Queensland (Department of the Premier and Cabinet) 2002 – Copyright protects this publication. Except for the Purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 – reproduction by whatever..... Forward by Premier Peter Beattie - Signed P Beattie - PETER BEATTIE MP PREMIER AND MINISTER FOR TRADE Queensland Week June, the Seal is not held to any Seal of Queensland Treasury Corporation Act 1988 Reprint 2A © State of Queensland 1998 There is no private Queensland Government having an Electoral Act under that Seal, for any outside person/s to vote for any person which includes Premier Peter Beattie MP, to stand, and create and form into a Queensland Government being a representative government of people living in Queensland?

38

Queensland

Constitution of Queensland 2001 Current as at 19 March 2020

© State of Queensland 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. In bringing this information I have placed my applications to the Premier who is the current holder of the Partnership Act 1891 and whose Treasury Corporation does not recognise the partnership agreement that I hold with the Queen, and is not the holder of the Public Seal of the Queensland Government Department of Premier and Education Queensland. The Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP is not the elected premier of the shareholders of the Legislative Assembly Company in Queensland people inside because she is a chief executive of a foreign trading corporation, registered internationally. So, all her employees are paid out of the profits of the firm and their authority is only over those shareholders of that corporation. I respectfully request that Her Majesty the Queen in the Capital of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra and in the Capital of Queensland Brisbane, set a prosecution Court along the lines of the Nuremburg Trails, appoint and swear three Judges and the appropriate prosecutors and investigators holding the full and total authority of Her Majesty the Queen, and arrest, charge and imprison the main principal offenders/people as was done after World War 2. The eyes of the world will be on the Commonwealth of Australia, Her Majesty the Queen and the people of this Nation. In Queensland there are private people Members of Registered Political Parties in the Parliament House of the People, the Governor, personal representative of Elizabeth II, residing Government House of the Queen, in Brisbane, and holding the Public Seal of the State only. The Supreme Court Building in Brisbane is labelled ELIZABETH II, and operates on the land of the Crown as held to Laws of CITATION a Corporation. The Supreme Court of Queensland holds an Australian Business Number, for all commerce and trade, and inside the Queensland Treasury Corporation , the Judges and the Members of the Legal Profession, and the Court Staff etc, are held in a private Partnership Agreement as held to Partnership Act 1891 Reprint 2C© State of Queensland 2009 with the Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP C/O Queensland Treasury Corp. The Judiciary, the Members of the Legal Profession of “the State” of Queensland do not Recognise the 53 & 54 VICT] Partnership Act, 1890. [CH. 39.] or the Common Law rights of any private person which includes Her Majesty the Queen ELIZ 2, the current holder of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld).

39

I refer to PENALTIES AND SENTENCING ACT 1992 Act No. 48 of 1992 © The State of Queensland 1992, It does not allow any pecuniary penalties of imprisonment or by way of fine in currency of the Queensland Treasury Corporation Act 1988. I refer to ELECTORAL ACT 1992 Act. No. 28 of 1992 © The State of Queensland 1992, only Members of Registered Political Parties can vote in that Act of the Queensland Treasury Corporation, no one else. The Queensland Treasury Corporation has no Currency Act, so therefore they have no currency in which to fine any person, or to commence Bankruptcy proceeding again any private persons/s inside the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) as held to 53 & 54 VICT] Partnership Act, 1890. [CH. 39.]

STATEMENT OF CLAIM - page 4 – self-explanatory.

Warning Queensland Statutes Reprints – OzCase Digitised Collection This copy is not an authorised reprint within the Meaning of the Reprints Act 1992 Qld.It may not be altered in any way any production or use of the work is for educational purposes only and not for Commercial gain © State of Queensland In 1988 with the opening of the Parliament House of the Australian Government by ELIZABETH II being an international trading corporation with the elected chief executive officer Mr. Bob Hawke M.P. so named. Her Majesty the Queen did not grant any letters Patent to Mr. Hawke, a private person to fill the vacancy left by Sir John Kerr. So, from 1988 till today, for the last 32 years the Australian Government is a private International Trading Corporation only and holding the authority of an individual and any persons associated with that corporation are held subject to The Crimes Act 1914. In 1988 Her Majesty the Queen the speaker in the Legislative Assembly refused to allow any members of registered Political Parties within the Legislative Assembly to sign any limited partnership agreements with any persons inside that Australian Government and receive any benefits or money from the firm. The then elected Premier inside the Legislative Assembly, Premier Ahern, issued the following document. This was for educational purposes only and any purported acts of the future Queensland Government or corporation that are copyrighted to the state of Queensland are not to be used for their own personal commercial gain as they themselves are subject to the law of justice in Queensland. The reprint act 1992 only allowed the reproduction of any future law or act electronically, so they have never received the royal assent, and those who have used those acts for personal gain are subject to the laws of justice as held to the constitution act Queensland 1867 (Qld.) as no person is above the law.

40

Queensland

Reprints Act 1992 Act No. 27 of 1992

An Act relating to reprints of legislation and for other purposes related to legislation [Assented to 1 June 1992] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows. †PART 1—PRELIMINARY ˙Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Reprints Act 1992. ˙Definitions 3. In this Act— “current legislative drafting practice” means current Queenslandlegislative drafting practice; “reprint” of a law includes a reproduction of the law in electronic form; “reprint date” of a reprint means the day specified in the reprint under section 5(c) as the reprint date; “subordinate legislation” has the meaning given the Statutory Instruments Act 1992. the Statutory Instruments Act 1992. 58. The following Acts are repealed— • Acts Citation Act 1903 • Statute Law Revision Act 1908 • Statutory Instruments Reprint Act 1952.

© The State of Queensland 1992 The manner and form Reprints Act 1992 Act No. 27 of 1992 An Act relating to reprints of legislation and for other purposes related to legislation [Assented to 1 June 1992 Attorney - General (NSW) V Trethowan (1931) HCA 3 – 44 CLR. BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:- The Reprints Act 1992 lies on the table of the Legislative Assembly having no Royal assent. All private acts theQueensland Treasury Corporation are reprinted Electronically, by way of the Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001inter alia Electronic Transaction Act 1999 of the Australian Government, which commenced trading in 1988, all transactions for real and personal; property of the firm, is done in electronic or digital currency only.

41

Queensland

Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001 Current as at 29 August 2013—revised version Reprint note Section 44 of the Reprints Act has been relied on to make an editorial change to s 26E(1)(b). © State of Queensland 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. n closing refer the Chief Justice to the Acts Interpretation Act 1954, Queensland which was also presented in every Court, that attended. Section 12 Private Acts not to effect rights of others – The Acts of the Queensland Treasury Corporation 1988 are of an International Trading Corporation as held to International Trading Logo - - theses acts have no authority over any person for Criminal or Civil Law commencing 1988 and does not impose liabilities on the Crown or another person in relation to previous acts or omissions; except so far as the Act otherwise expressly provides The Laws of Queensland are the Laws of Members of the Registered Political Parties, and upheld by the Courts and the Legal Profession, Police and the employees of the Queensland Treasury Corporation living in Queensland is in fact no more than a Totalitarian State and living in no more than a total dictatorship, over and above the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) held by Her Majesty the Queen and the current holder of the [53 & 54 VICT] Partnership Act, 1890. [ CH. 39.]

Queensland

AUSTRALIA ACTS (REQUEST) (Act not amended up to this date)

This is the reprint current on the repeal date Reprint No. 1A

This reprint is prepared by the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel

Warning—This reprint is not an authorised copy AUSTRALIA ACTS (REQUEST) ACT 1985 [as amended by all amendments that commenced on or before 6 June 2002] An Act to enable the constitutional arrangements affecting the Commonwealth and the States to be brought into conformity with the status of the Commonwealth of Australia as a sovereign, independent and federal nation 1 Short title

42

This Act may be cited as the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985. 2 Request for Commonwealth legislation The Parliament requests the enactment by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of an Act in, or substantially in, the terms set out in Schedule 1. 3 Request and consent to United Kingdom legislation The Parliament and Government of the State request and consent to the enactment by the Parliament of the United Kingdom of an Act in, or substantially in, the terms set out in the Schedule to the Act contained in Schedule 2. 4 Request and consent to Commonwealth legislation The Parliament and Government of the State request and consent to the enactment by the Parliament of the Commonwealth of an Act in, or substantially in, the terms set out in Schedule 2. 4 Table of earlier reprints TABLE OF EARLIER REPRINTS [If a reprint number includes a roman letter, the reprint was released in unauthorised, electronic form only.] 5 List of legislation Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 No. 69 date of assent 16 October 1985 commenced on date of assent rep 6 June 2002 (2001 No. 80 s 95(1) sch 3) 6 Historical context. This Act is part of a series of Acts that resulted in the abolition of certain residual constitutional links between Australia and the United Kingdom. All Australian States enacted an Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 requesting the enactment of certain legislation by the Commonwealth and the United Kingdom. The Commonwealth consequently enacted the Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 and the Australia Act 1986. In response to the 1985 Commonwealth and State Australia Acts, the United Kingdom enacted the Australia Act 1986. The Australia Act 1986 (Cwlth) and the Australia Act 1986 (UK) commenced simultaneously on 3 March 1986. Reprint No. Amendments included Reprint date 1 none 19 July 1994 © State of Queensland 2002 AUSTRALIA ACTS (REQUEST) © State of Queensland 2002, It may not be altered in any way any production or use of the work is for educational purposes only and not for Commercial gain © State of Queensland. 2. - TABLE OF EARLIER REPRINTS – [If a reprint number includes a roman letter, the reprint was released in unauthorised, electronic form only.] – Reprint IA – Act has been reprinted electrically to Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001 has no Royal assent of ELIZABETH II. 1. Refer - page 4 – - STATEMENT OF CLAIM - Warning Queensland Statutes Reprints – Oz Case Digitised Collection This copy is not an authorized reprint within the Meaning of the Reprints Act 1992 Qld. It may not be altered in any way any production or use of the work is for educational purposes only and not for Commercial gain © State of Queensland

43

BY AUTHORITY S.R. HAMPSON GOVERNMENT PRINTER, QUEENSLAND - 1989 The taking of any Real and Personal Property and money of the shareholders of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia, inside the Preamble of the Commonwealth of Australia, by then Sealing of the COMPANIES ACT 1948 - ELIZABETH II. Is Criminal Offence, at Common law by the employees, agents etc of the Queensland Treasury Corporation, as held to Laws of Justice in Queensland, as all acts of the Queensland Treasury Corporation are © State of Queensland 2002 NB It may not be altered in any way any production or use of the work is for educational purposes only and not for Commercial gain © State of Queensland. To remove the PREAMBLE of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld), of the private and personal property of Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 2, is a criminal offence as held to the highest offence of the land can be enforced at Common Law’ The current holder of the [53 & 54 VICT] Partnership Act, 1890. [CH. 39.] is a criminal offence under the Criminal Law of the Queensland, ignorance of that law is no excuse.

[53 & 54 VICT] Partnership Act, 1890. [CH. 39.]

An Act to declare and amend the Law of Partnership. [14th August 1890.]

BE it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: -

44

Queensland

Partnership Act 1891 Current as at 28 May 2012

© State of Queensland 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

I am not a Member of a Registered Political Party inside the private Constitutions of the Registered Political Parties in Queensland and I am not subject to any Partnership Act 1891, held the Premier the Chief Officer of an International Trading Corporation the Queensland Treasury, based in Brisbane. I cannot vote for those people in that private Australian Business, commencing 14th February, 1966 and I receive no benefits from their private trading corporation the firm.

Queensland

Constitution Act 1867 Current as at 6 June 2002—revised version

Reprint note Powers under the Reprints Act 1992 have been used in this reprint to bring the legislation into line with current drafting practice. © State of Queensland 2019

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) currently held by Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2, inside the PREAMBLE of the DEED of the Company the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK), is now the property of ELIZABETH II, holding person to person partnership Agreement with the Premier of the Queensland.

Queensland

Queensland Treasury Corporation Act 1988 Current as at 23 September 2013

© State of Queensland 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ABN Lookup – Current details for ABN: 65 959 415 158 Entity name: DEPARTMENT OF THE PREMIER & CABINET Entity type: State Government Entity

45

Queensland

Commonwealth Places (Administration of Laws) Act 1970

Current as at 27 September 1974—revised version © State of Queensland 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative

Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ABN Lookup – Current details for ABN: 65 959 415 158 Entity name: DEPARTMENT OF THE PREMIER & CABINET Entity type: State Government Entity

Queensland

Australian Constitutions Act 1844 Current as at 2 August 1907

© State of Queensland 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ABN Lookup – Current details for ABN: 65 959 415 158 Entity name: DEPARTMENT OF THE PREMIER & CABINET Entity type: State Government Entity

Queensland

Australian Waste Lands Act 1855 Current as at 20 July 1896

© State of Queensland 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 19 - As to the term Governor In this Act— Governor shall mean the person for the time being lawfully administering the government of any colony. ABN Lookup – Current details for ABN: 65 959 415 158 Entity name: DEPARTMENT OF THE PREMIER & CABINET Entity type: State Government Entity

46

Queensland

Governors (Salary and Pensions) Act 2003 Current as at 22 March 2016

© State of Queensland 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Queensland

Anglican Church of Australia Act 1895 Current as at 24 August 1981—revised version

Reprint note— This reprint has been reformatted to reflect current drafting styles. © State of Queensland 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence ABN Lookup – Current details for ABN: 65 959 415 158 Entity name: DEPARTMENT OF THE PREMIER & CABINET Entity type: State Government Entity

Queensland

Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 Current as at 26 February 2020

© State of Queensland 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. As the Premier of the State of Queensland is the current holder of the Partnership Act 1891, and has sealed the Constitution Act 1867, Qld, held by Her Majesty the Queen, Eliz 2, the current holder of the Partnership Act, 1890, which holds the land of the Crown inside side the PREAMBLE and that land is held in Imperial Measurements, and all Criminal Offence are held to Common Law of England. No private person a Member of the Queensland Police Service, holding the authority ofthe Premier the Chief Executive Officer of the Queensland Treasury Corporation, a private employee of the Treasury Corporation, a Member of the Queensland Police Service and paid from the profits of the firm, as the act implies police officers give a private service to the firm only and held in the Partnership Act 1891, hold no personal authority to arrest person in the land of the Crown for any Criminal or Common Law, or stop any person for traffic offences or such like. The Police Officers give a private security service to the Queensland Treasury Corporation as the Act itself is sealed to the Public Seal of the Queensland Treasury,

47

Corporation, the Seal is held by the elected Chief Officer, holder of the Queensland Treasury Corporation Act 1988, the Chief Executive Officer the Premier Anastasia Palaszczuk MP, C/O Queensland Treasury Corp. 111 Eagle Street, BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001 No Judge of any Supreme Court of Queensland holds any Seals of the Premier of the Queensland Land Treasury Corporation, and cannot hear and determine and Criminal or Common Law Offences, as they hold no Seals of the Crown, Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2, to impose any Statutory fines or a Statutory term of imprisonment, as held to CITATIONS of a private trading International Court only for internal matters only of the Queensland Treasury Corporation. As held to and act of the Queensland Treasury Corporation - WORKPLACE RELATIONS ACT 1997 Act No. 1 of 1997 The Parliament of Queensland enacts— © State of Queensland 1997, no Statutorily appointed Judge or Magistrate, hold any Common Law authority over any private person Sealed inside the PREAMBLE of the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) by way of the Partnership Act 1891. Any subjects of the Crown that are presently imprisoned for any purported Criminal Offence of the Queensland Treasury Corporation, the Chief Executive Officer the Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP must personally Order their immediate release.

Queensland

Electoral Act 1992 Current as at 2 October 2018

© State of Queensland 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Queensland

Acts Interpretation Act 1954 Current as at 3 July 2017

© State of Queensland 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Acts Interpretation Act 1954

An Act to assist in the shortening and interpretation of Queensland Acts

Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title This Act may be cited as the Acts Interpretation Act 1954. 2 Act applies to all Acts This Act applies to all Acts (including this Act).

48

Note—For the application of this Act to statutory instruments, see the Statutory Instruments Act 1992, part 4, divisions 1 and 2. 4 Displacement of Act by contrary intention The application of this Act may be displaced, wholly or partly, by a contrary intention appearing in any Act. 5 Act binds Crown This Act binds the Crown. 10 Section has effect as substantive enactment Every section of an Act has effect as a substantive enactment without introductory words. 11 Acts to be public Acts Every Act passed after 26 July 1852 is a public Act unless the Act otherwise expressly provides. 12 Private Acts not to affect rights of others (1) A private Act does not— (a) affect pre-existing rights in a way prejudicial to the Crown or another person; or (b) impose liabilities on the Crown or another person in relation to previous acts or omissions; except so far as the Act otherwise expressly provides. (2) Subsection (1) does not affect rights conferred, or liabilities imposed, on— (a) a person at whose instance, or for whose special benefit, the Act is passed; or (b) another person claiming by, through or under such a person. 12A Private Acts amended by public Acts do not become public Acts A private Act does not become a public Act merely because it has been amended by or under a public Act. Page 94 Current as at 3 July 2017 Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel I refer to Acts Interpretation Act 1954 of Queensland Treasury Corporation 1988 Section 12 Private Acts not to effect rights of others – The Acts of the Queensland Treasury Corporation 1988 are of an International Trading Corporation as held to International Trading Logo - - theses acts have no authority over any person for Criminal or Civil Law commencing 1988. 12 Private Acts not to affect rights of others (1) A private Act does not— (a) affect pre-existing rights in a way prejudicial to the Crown or another person; or (b) impose liabilities on the Crown or another person in relation to previous acts or omissions; except so far as the Act otherwise expressly provides.The vacancies in the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council remain open to this date. So much damage has been done to so many by the few who since the 14th February 1966, signing a private contract with a “foreign Queen” ELIZABETH II, to take over the Nation, the people, and the assets for private and personal gain, by slow degrees must immediately cease now. The State of Queensland Australia became a Sovereign State of the Commonwealth of Australia, by the Chief Executive Officer of the Queensland Treasury Corporation Sealing the Constitution Act 1867, to the Partnership Act 1891, and the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.

49

The Laws Of Nature and Nature’s God - Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books

by Sir William Blackstone [EXTRACTS]

VOLUME I—INTRODUCTION: OF THE STUDY OF NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE LAWS OF ENGLAND. SECTION 1—ON THE STUDY OF THE LAW Yet farther; most gentlemen of considerable property, at some period or other in their lives, are ambitious of representing their country in parliament: and those, who are ambitious of receiving so high a trust, would also do well to remember its nature and importance.They are the guardians of the English constitution; the makers, repealers, and interpreters of the English laws; delegated to watch, to check, and to avert every dangerous innovation, to propose, to adopt, and to cherish any solid and well-weighed improvement; bound by every tie of nature, of honour, and of religion, to transmit that constitution and those laws to posterity, amended if possible, at least without any derogation. And how unbecoming must it appear in a member of the legislature to vote for a new law, who is utterly ignorant of the old! What kind of interpretation can he be enabled to give, who is a stranger to the text upon which he comments! Indeed, it is perfectly amazing that there should be no other state of life, no other occupation, art, or science, in which some method of instruction is not looked upon as requisite, but every man of superior fortune thinks himself born a legislator. Yet Tully was of a different opinion: “It is necessary,” says he,(e) “for a senator to be thoroughly acquainted with the constitution; and this,” he declares, “is a knowledge of the most extensive nature; a matter of science, of diligence, of reflection; without which no senator can possiblybe fit for his office.” The mischiefs that have arisen to the public from inconsiderate alterations in our laws, are too obvious to be called in question; and how far they have been owing to the defective education of our senators, is a point well worthy the public attention. The common law of England has fared like other venerable edifices of antiquity, which rash and unexperienced workmen have ventured to new-dress and refine, with all the rage of modern improvement. Hence frequently its symmetry has been destroyed, its proportions distorted, and its majestic simplicity exchanged for specious embellishments and fantastic novelties. For, to say the truth, almost all the perplexed questions, almost all the niceties, intricacies, and delays, (which have sometimes disgraced the English, as well as other courts of justice) owe their original not to the common law itself, but to innovations that have been made in it by acts ofparliament, “overladen (as Sir Edward Coke expresses it) with provisos and additions, and many times on a sudden penned or corrected by men of none or very little judgment in law.” This great and well-experienced judge declares, that in all his time he never knew two questions made upon rights merely depending upon the common law; and warmly laments the confusion introduced by ill-judging and unlearned legislators.

50

Should a judge in the most subordinate jurisdiction be deficient in the knowledge of the law, it would reflect infinite contempt upon himself, and disgrace upon those who employ him. And yet the consequence of his ignorance is comparatively very trifling and small: his judgment may beexamined, and his errors rectified, by other courts.But how much more serious and affecting is the case of a superior judge, if without any skill in the laws he will boldly venture to decide a question upon which the welfare and subsistence of whole families may depend! Where the chance of his judging right, or wrong, is barely equal; and where, if he chances to judge wrong, he does an injury of the most alarming nature, an injury without possibility of redress. In the making of this The Petition of Right [1627] 1627 CHAPTER 1 3 Cha 1, to be presented to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia to personally contact Her Majesty the Queen and foreword the documents by e-mail, to Her Majesty the Queen’s immediate attention and action, I close on the words of Sir William Blackstone, which was penned in 1770. I requested following Orders in the attached document for either yourself as the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, to issue the writs as required or have Her Majesty the Queen sign the Orders/writs. I refer the Chief Justice to the Statement of Claim where I sought Costs and damages to the sum of $A210 Million Dollars. That money was also to be shared among the people that I tried to assist in not the Queensland Courts, The Federal Court of Australia, The High Court of Australia the Privy Council, the International Court of Justice in the Hague, the International Criminal Court, all to no avail the answer sorry we cannot hear the matters and we cannot file the matters. The International Court of Justice advised this matter is for the High Court of Australia, every time I to tried to file any application on those lines, the Registrars refused to file those applications and sent them back, saying the judges will not understand what you are talking about, as the system, in Australia has changed for the better. I respectfully request the Judges of the High Court of Australia have the appropriate Order/Writ issued in whatever format. That either the Prime Mister of Australia or the Premier of the Chief Executive Officer of the Queensland Corporation, pay that amount of money into a bank account of my name and my choosing within 14 days, that I may commence to distribute that money fairly, to those people, those lost everything, I could not help. I will give those details when requested. I further respectfully the Judges of the High Court of Australia to issue the appropriate Writ/s or Order/s on The Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP Queensland Treasury Corporation 111 Eagle Street, BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001. 1. I request the Judges of the High Court of Australia issue the appropriate , Writ or Order to be served on The Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP Queensland Treasury

51

Corporation 111 Eagle Street, BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001, to prevent - that all any members of the Queensland Corporation, from uphold the Common Law the Criminal Law in the Jurisdiction and upon the land of the Crown held in the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) by Her Majesty the Queen Eliz 2. 2. I request the Judges of the High Court of Australia issue the appropriate, Writ or Order to be served on The Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP Queensland Treasury Corporation 111 Eagle Street, BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001, that money requested for payments for any accounts, fines etc to be paid into the Queensland Treasury Corporation, in any foreign currency to be collected, and all agencies, can only be issued to terms of Partnership Act 1891 Current as at 28 May 2012 © State of Queensland 2019

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 3. I request the Judges of the High Court of Australia issue the appropriate, Writ or Order to be served on The Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP Queensland Treasury Corporation 111 Eagle Street, BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001, to immediately release all persons incarcerated in the Queensland Prison System as held to the Statutory Law of the Queensland Treasury Corporation Act 1988. 4. I request the Judges of the High Court of Australia issue the appropriate, Writ or Order to be served on The Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP Queensland Treasury Corporation 111 Eagle Street, BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001, that no more notices from, rates, land tax or fees to be sent any person living on the land of the Crown inside the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld). I also request, that Her Majesty the Queen to use whatever force is necessary to remove the supporter of ELIZABETH II, from the corridors of power in the Commonwealth of Australia and the United Kingdom, and Her Majesty to sign seal and date Orders, to the effect to ELIZABETH II the heir and assign of Charles I and the moderator of the Anglican Church struck from the record for eternity. I have requested these actions be done electronically as there are still are major restrictions worldwide with the coronavirus (COVID-19) virus. I will forward these documents to the Chief Justice of the High Court from Herberton by mail. But I have been informed by the Post Office that it may take up to 10 to 12 days to arrive. If there is any reason that the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, is unable to comply with this Petition of Right to please advise me accordingly, by return e-mail. In the same tone if the Chief Justice can accept this Petition of Rights to please advise me of the day that The Chief Justice of the High Court forwarded the documents as attached to Her Majesty the Queen. If any further evidence or documentation is required, I will forward it also by e-mail. I will, sign any Criminal Complainant to have the people, who have brought about the total destruction of the Commonwealth and give evidence, any court of the Crown.

52

God save the Queen.

1

________________________________________________________________________ The Premier Queensland the Smart State Annastacia Palaszczuk MP C/O Queensland Treasury Corp. 111 Eagle Street, BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001 RE: CLAIM and STATEMENT OF CLAIM. The Premier, I refer to the Claim and the Statement of Claim forwarded to you as the Chief Executive Officer inside the Officials in Parliament Act 1896 Reprint No.2C © State of Queensland 2002, and the Current Executive Officer of the firm and the holder of the Register, of the shareholders of CORPORATIONS (QUEENSLAND) ACT 1990 Reprinted as in force on 11 May 2001 (includes amendments up to Act No. 12 of 2000) Reprint No. 2C © State of Queensland 2001, dealing in Decimal Currency commencing 14th February,1966 and Land held in metric measurements of ELIZABETH 11 inter alia ELECTORAL ACT 1992 Reprinted as in force on 6 December 2002 (includes amendments up to Act No. 8 of 2002) Reprint No. 5A© State of Queensland 2002. I am not a shareholder in the Register of the firm , held by yourself the Executive Officer of the firm, and I cannot vote in any election by way of Electoral Act 1992 to vote as a private person inside the Partnership Act 1891 Reprint 2C © State of Queensland 2009, to take up any elected position in any PARLIAMENT OF QUEENSLAND ACT 2001 Reprinted as in force on 20 May 2004 (includes commenced amendments up to 2004 Act No. 7) Reprint No. 1D © State of Queensland 2004, to make a profit for the Registered Members of the firm. I refer to the following to one of the Constitutional Matters in this CLAIM, one of those numerous matters, is very simple on 2nd April 1996, a Member of one would have to assume being a Member of the Legislative Assembly, Mr. Peter Douglas Beattie MLA, made an application in the Legislative Assembly inside the Constitution Act 1867 Qld, LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT BILL 1996 – An Act to amend the

David J. Walter

Post Office Box 578 Herberton, Tel: (07) 4096 3009 Queensland 4887 Fax: (07) 4096 2641 Australia

'Where there is no vision the people perish; but he that keepeth the law, happy is he' - Proverbs Ch.29 v.18

2

Legislative Assembly Act 1867 – to in fact amend the Legislative Act 18967, which was refused by the other Members of the Legislative Assembly, this in fact was refused and that was the end of the matter totally, I note the word Queensland over and above the Public Seal of the (the “State”) of QUEENSLAND BRISBAINE AUSTRALIA as held to AUSTRALIA ACTS (REQUEST) ACT 1985 Reprinted as in force on 6 June 2002 Reprint No. 1A:- 4 Table of earlier reprints TABLE OF EARLIER REPRINTS [If a reprint number includes a roman letter, the reprint was released in unauthorised, electronic form only.] 5 List of legislation Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 No. 69 date of assent 16 October 1985 commenced on date of assentred 6 June 2002 (2001 No. 80 s 95(1) sch 3) © State of Queensland 2002 Queensland

LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT BILL 1996 – A BILL FOR An Act to amend the Legislative Assembly Act 1867 – Presented: - P. D. Beattie 2.4.1996 - 2nd Reading failed 2.4.1996 On the 2nd April 1996 as an elected Member of the Legislative Assembly - MLA - P.D. Beattie, presented a private members BILL – to amend the Legislative Assembly Act 1867, that private Members Bill was refused to be passed by the Members of the Legislative Assembly. Refer to attached Exhibit DJW 8 - I refer to CERTIFICATE OF EXHIBIT – BOOK DJW 6 - This exhibit is in documents filed in SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND BRISBAINE AUSTRALIA – ELIZABETH 11 in CAIRNS File No.349/18, subject but not limited to:- Exhibit DJW 5 - Senate Elections Act 1960 © State of Queensland 2017 Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel Exhibit DJW 10- Electoral and Referendum Amendment Act (No.1) 2001 Exhibit DJW 12- ELECTORAL AND OTHER AMENDMENT ACT 2002 ACT No.8 of 2002 © State of Queensland 2002.

3

Exhibit DJW 14- Governors (Salary and Pensions) Act 2003 © State of Queensland 2016. QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT GAZETTE – EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY - Vol. 366 Tuesday 29 July 2016 - A PROCLAMATION Exhibit DJW 15 - Succession to the Crown Act 2015 No. 23, 2015 Exhibit DJW 16 – LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ACT 1867 – Reprinted as in force August 1999 (includes amendments up to Act No.21 of 1999) Reprint No.2A ©State of Queensland 1999. There is one Constitution of Queensland and that is the Constitution Act 1867 Qld, the Legislative Assembly Act 1867 over and above the Request by Peter Beattie MLA is now copyrighted the State of Queensland 1999 as is the Electoral Act 1992, and there is no Governor Appointed by the Crown Her Majesty the QUEEN Elizabeth 2. I refer to the Explanatory Statement of former Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs. [Extract] “I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and it States and Territories has no basis in law.”..... “It is the politicians’ who are using us as pawns without them having to face the music. These matters are of concern to politicians, let them sort out these problems and accept any inherent risks themselves”. This Claim is not only for Compensation for the loss of my property, my imprisonment, and personal matters, but also the loss of my self-esteem and the destruction of my whole life work, it also had devastating effects on my wife’s mental and physical health leaving her with the heartbreaking realization that she/we are unprotected and vulnerable to the government representatives that, as an Australian wife and mother we expect to have our best interests at heart, as in evidence put before a Court of Queensland. I believe it had an enormous impact on her premature death. Further the taking of a most treasured gift the right to vote under the very Constitution of this Nation - Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and the Constitution Act 1867 Qld, for which our furthers laid down their very lives to protect for us the generation that followed them. I refer to Attached Exhibit DJW 9 – ELECTORAL AMENDMENT BILL 1999 – Refused to be passed by the Legislative Assembly inside the Constitution Act 1867 Qld. I also therefore demand that as I hold the full Royal Prerogative of the Crown and I now use and invoke, that total Royal Prerogative that immediately upon receipt of these documents, and if you wish to have an employee pick up the documents so sent by Registered Post and has been in Post Office Brisbane for a week and still remains uncollected.

4

You are to forward a copy of all the documents, to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australian in Canberra, as directed in the Claim and Statement of Claim and to advise me under your hand writing that documents were dispatched, and the date of receipt by the Chief Justice Susan Kiefel. You Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP, have 28 days from the day of receipt of this correspondence to have the Claim Settled as agreed in writing signed by both parties, or I will have the Claim for Costs and Damages and related matters placed before a Jury in SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CAIRNS AUSTRALIA, for full open hearing. I did on Friday 13th July 2018, speak to a lady in the Legal Section of the Queensland Treasury Corporation, who was going to reply to me by e-mail on that date but no e-mail was received, that I had in fact forwarded the documents in the attached Claim, by Registered Post and that they remain uncollected in the main Post office in Brisbane. I note the two boxes of documents are still uncollected in the Post Office in Brisbane. I refer to the e-mail from one of your employees Jessica Cole Registrar, Supreme, District and Land Court Cairns – Queensland Court Service. I made this Claim as held to Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001 Current as at 29 August 2013 © State of Queensland 2017, I refer to Part 2 , under State laws, to be in writing only when making the Claim. There are no Orders of you as the Executive Officer of the firm and the holder of the Register that it was to be given as held to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court Queensland Act 1991© State of Queensland 2017. I was also required to pay a fee to the firm in Australian Currency in Australian Currency to have the matter lodged that as you will note, was on 5/07/2018 12:33:41, CAIRNS. I, had to make a number of telephone calls, to the Supreme Court Complex of ELIZABETH 11, to have the matter registered as held to Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001 Current as at 29 August 2013 © State of Queensland 2017, some 8 days after the filing and accepting of the Australian Currency for the fee for registration only. I note the reply of the Registrar Jessica Cole – at my insistence, it is not at my insistence is in fact a direct order to the Register from yourself as the current Executive Officer of the firm. I have attached the CLAIM and the STATEMENT OF CLAIM, which is signed personally by myself and sealed, signed and dated as held to Public Seal of - THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND BRISBAINE AUSTRALIA and held to the laws of ELIZABETH 11. I, David John Walter, now place the vicarious liability upon you a private person, the Executive Officer, Premier Anasatacia Palaszczuk as held to STATEMENT OF CLAIM, signed and dated personally by myself to forward all the documents as attached as requested to the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in Canberra, inside the Deed

5

by way of the Preamble Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) at Chapter 111 THE JUDICATURE as held to JUDICATURE ACT 1876, as a result of the matters raised as a very serious Constitutional issues, we now have in Queensland as held to Constitution Act 1867 Qld and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK). Upon the delivery by Australia Post and signature and receipt by an employees or agent of (the “State”), the documents that I have advised you are at the Brisbane Post Office in two Registered Boxes of Documents, and a the documents attached in this Claim are deemed to be served. Yours faithfully

Folio DJW 1 - e-mail Registrar Supreme Court Cairns, 13 July 2018. Folio DJW 2 - Queensland Courts Official Receipt Number 004700395. Folio DJW 3 - CLAIM Folio DJW 4 - STATEMENT OF CLAIM Folio DJW 5 - JUDICATURE ACT 1876 Folio DJW 6 - OFFICIALS IN PARLIAMENT ACT 1896 Reprint No.2C © State of Queensland 2002. Folio DJW 7 - Acquisition of Land Act 1967 Reprint 4B Reprint No.2C © State of Queensland 2002 Folio DJW8 - LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT BILL 1996 Folio DJW 9 - ELECTORAL AMENDMENT BILL 1999

Owner

Sticky Note

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 1 of 32 List of court cases

______________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF COURT CASES & FURTHER PENDING MATTERS ______________________________________________________________________________________ The private persons, being the sovereign people cited in these matters, held to ‘articles of association’ the Constitution of The Commonwealth of Australia 1901 as proclaimed found Preamble Clauses 1-9 Laws of England, Habeas Corpus Act 1816 inter the Constitution signed Sealed Magna Carter inter alia Royal Styles Act 1953 inter alia Statute of Westminster 1931 ,inter alia Geneva Convention Act 1957 inter alia The Preamble of The Charter of The United Nations include:- The Indigenous People of the Aboriginal Nation of Australia belonging to the Rambunga/Myallie tribes, individual private persons subjects of the Crown at section 117 of the Constitution Act 1901 as proclaimed and Gazetted as every other subject of the Crown in The Commonwealth of Australia. Mabo v Queensland [1988] HCA 69 (8 December 1988) (1989) 166 CLR 186 (Mason C.J., Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ.) Note: The Common Law of England was applied Their rights as firstly, the first inhabitants, indigenous people of Australia and secondly as subjects of the Crown at section 117 and as found inside the Preamble of the ‘articles of association’ of The Commonwealth of Australia, the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901, as Proclaimed and Gazetted. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act “An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia” [9th July 1900] Page 57 Note No. 17 “Section 74 – see Privy Council (Limitation of Appeals) Act 1968, Privy Council (Appeals from the High Court) Act 1975 and Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No. 2); Ex parte

David J. Walter Post Office Box 578 Tel: (07) 4096 3009

Herberton Int: + 61 7 4096 3009 Queensland 4887 Fax: (07) 4096 2641 Australia Int: + 61 7 4096 2641

“Where there is no vision the people perish; but he that keepeth

the law, happy is he.” Proverbs Ch.29 v.18

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 2 of 32 List of court cases

Attorney-General (QLD) (1985) 159 CLR 451.” Refer: Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 1) [1985] HCA 8 (27 February 1985); (1985) 159 CLR 351 (Gibbs CJ, Mason, Murphy, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, JJ.) Kirmani v Captain Cook Cruises Pty Ltd (No 2) [1985] HCA 27 (17 April 1985); (1985) 159 CLR 461 (Gibbs CJ, Mason, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, JJ.) Privy Council (Limitation of Appeals) Act 1968 (Cth) Privy Council (Appeals from the High Court) Act 1975 (Cth) The Constitution (63 & 64 Vict. c. 12), s. 74. Note: This decision of the Australian Government’s High Court of Australia, has altered the application by “Australian Courts” and by the Privy Council,

of Section 74 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted, by denying the people inside the Preamble and Clauses 1 to 9, their constitutional right of access to Her Majesty in Council and Her Majesty’s Privy Council.

Refer:- HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA ABN 69 445 188 986 Entity Name: HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Entity type: Commonwealth Government Entity Trading Name(s):THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA High Court Rules 2004 Statutory Rules No.304, 2004 as amended made under the Judiciary Act 1903, Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 and High Court of Australia Act 1979 Compilation start date 11 June 2013 Includes amendments up to: SLI No.107, 2013. This is THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA for a ‘foreign government and political subdivisions’ – The Parliaments of Australia as held to THE CONSTITUTION as in

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 3 of 32 List of court cases

force 1st June 2003 and AUSTRALIA’S CONSTITUTION First Edition May 1995 inter alia the Statute Law Revision Act 1973, No. 216 of 1973 inter alia Statute Law Revision Act 2011 – ‘The Parliament of Australia enacts’, Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Act 2010. Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (“Mabo case”) [1992] HCA 23 (3 June 1992) (1992) 175 CLR 1 (Mason C.J., Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron and McHugh JJ.) Note: The Common Law of Australia was applied

The following list of people named are full blood traditional aboriginal people of the Aboriginal Nation of Australia who reside in the Aboriginal Community known as Beswick (Wugularr) Community via Katherine, Northern Territory. NAME: ADDRESS: SKIN NAME:

Fred Ryan Beswick, via Katherine, NT. Bargnadi

Michael Lim Beswick, via Katherine, NT Bargnadi Gwen Ryan(dec’d) Beswick, via Katherine, NT Wamutjan Doreen Morton(dec’d)Beswick, via Katherine, NT Wamutjan Dixie Blitner Beswick, via Katherine, NT Wamutjan

Anne Marie Ryan Beswick via Katherine N.T Ngaritjan Nicky Ryan Beswick, via Katherine N.T. Ngaritjan Daphne Ryan Beswick, via Katherine N.T. Ngaritjan

Desmond Ryan Beswick, via Katherine, N.T Ngarity Larry Ryan Beswick, via Katherine, N.T. Ngarity David John Ryan Beswick, via Katherine, N.T Ngarity Simeon Ryan Beswick, via Katherine, N.T Ngarity Edmund Ryan Beswick, via Katherine, N.T Ngarity Victor Hood Beswick Station, via Katherine, N.T. Wamut David Doctor Beswick Station Via Katherine N.T. Wamut Cerys Farrell Beswick Station Via Katherine N.T. Garmanj Faith & Hope Ryan Beswick, via Katherine, N.T. Garmanj Kirsty Doctor Beswick via Katherine N.T. Garlijan Davina Doctor Beswick via Katherine N.T. Garlijan

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 4 of 32 List of court cases

Chantelle Doctor Beswick via Katherine N.T. Garlijan Jacob Doctor Beswick via Katherine N.T. Gellar Lahtias Doctor Beswick via Katherine N.T. Gellar Selwyn Farrell Beswick via Katherine N.T. Gellar Desmond Farrel Beswick, via Katherine, N.T. Gellar Peter Farrel(Jnr) Beswick, via Katherine, N.T. Gellar Seamus Farrel Beswick, via Katherine, N.T. Gellar Sabrina Hood Beswick Via Katherine N.T. Balinj Evelyn Hood Beswick Via Katherine N.T. Balinj James HOOD Beswick Via Katherine N.T. Balang _______________________________________________________________________ The following court cases involve sovereign people who have been denied their constitutional, common law, civil and political rights and their liberties and privileges by decisions made in corporate “Australian courts” under an Australian system of government:- ROBERT NEVILLE BONE Clearing of native vegetation on privately owned freehold land

12 April 2002 Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA 120 McPherson and Williams JJA and Byrne J

25 June 2003 Bone v Mothershaw B29/2002[2003] HCA Trans 829 (25 June 2003) McHugh J; Gummow J. Fined $A 20,000.00, costs $A 6,272.00 in default of payment to be imprisoned for a period of six months, as held to the civil law of the Corporations (Queensland) Act 1990, containing no private people and no royal prerogative. The Local Government Act is sealed with the Public Seal of The State and copyrighted The State of Queensland 1993. The Act is unsigned and is not a law of the sovereign people. The Local Government is inside the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment (IGAE) and is an entity of The State of Queensland inside the Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 and the Constitution of Queensland 2001 and the Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991, all sealed with the Public Seal of The State and copyrighted The State of Queensland which are unsigned Acts of The State of Queensland and have no authority over the sovereign people. Mr Robert Bone suffered an estimated loss of A$215,635,666.00. Bone v Mothershaw[2002] QCA 120

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 5 of 32 List of court cases

[Extract] McPherson JJA “……….The Council has not taken any interest of Mr Bone’s, so as to attract the operation of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 or otherwise. He retains unimpaired, for what it is worth, his estate in fee simple absolute in the land. He has been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value. There is, as is attested by an affidavit from the valuer provided at the hearing, no doubt that the value of the land has been greatly reduced. But the law provides no remedy for this action or its consequences when it is the result of legislation validly passed under law-making authority that by its terms or nature authorises or permits such an outcome.” Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay. Correspondence from Robert Bone dated 28th January 2014 to Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, Australian Taxation Office. Your Ref: 7102093132292 And further Account No: 99214126313

Robert Ravanello, Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, GPO Box 9990, Brisbane, Queensland 4000

RE: ROBERT BONE, PO BOX 788, SPRINGWOOD, QLD. 4127

I refer to your taxation account dated 23 November 2013 for Account No: 99214126313, where your require the entity ROBERT BONE to pay the amount of $A5,081.69 in Australian currency, not being the legal tender of The Commonwealth of Australia – pounds, shillings and pence.

Further, I refer to your taxation account dated 5 December 2013 for your reference , 7102093132292 where your require the entity ROBERT BONE to pay the amount of $A 49,395.92 in Australian currency, not being the legal tender of The Commonwealth of Australia – pounds, shillings and pence.

Correspondence from Robert Bone, dated 28th January 2014, forwarded to the Queensland Office of State Revenue.

David Smith,

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 6 of 32 List of court cases

Executive Director, The Office of State Revenue. GPO Box 15931 City East, Qld 4002

Dear Sir,

RE: ROBERT BONE, 236 GARDNER RD, ROCHEDALE, QLD 4123

I refer to the correspondence dated 5 January 2014 with regard to the payment of land tax as held to the Taxation Administration Act 2001, you allege is owed to your Department by the entity ROBERT BONE for the year 2014 for the sum of $A10,324.94 in Australian currency, not in the legal tender of The Commonwealth of Australia – pounds, shillings and pence.

CATHERINE ELIZABETH BURNS Application for clearing of native vegetation on 26 acres of privately owned freehold land – application refused and Catherine Elizabeth Burns who is on an aged pension can no longer utilise her land in any way except walk on it though she still has to pay rates on her land to the Local Government Council which amount to $A 2,500.00 per annum. Re: Lot 6 CP10416, Stony Creek Road, Cardwell Shire, Queensland 2 August 2004 Burns v State of Queensland

District Court in Cairns

P & E Appeal No. 62 of 2004 JUDGE WHITE [Extract] Judge White DCJ

“People come to Courts in the hope of receiving justice; I have no doubt that is what brought Mrs Burns to this Court. Courts where possible, try to give justice, particularly when the rights of an individual citizen are being trampled upon by executive government. But a Court may only give justice which is allowed by law.”

19 November 2004 Burns v State of Queensland [2004] QSC 434

de Jersey CJ. 23 June 2006 Burns v State of Queensland & Croton [2006] QCA 235 Jerrard JA., Cullinane and Jones JJ. 27 July 2007 Burns v State of Queensland & Croton [2007] QCA 240 Jerrard JA., Cullinane and Jones JJ. 28 March 2008 Burns v State of Queensland & Croton [2008] HCASL 68 W.M.C. Gummow and S.M. Kiefel

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 7 of 32 List of court cases

Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay Chief Clerk. CRIS BRIAN PHILLIPS (Director NINO PTY LTD) Cris Brian Phillips owned a barramundi breeding farm and supplied fillets of fish and fingerling barramundi both nationally and internationally and had an annual turnover of approximately $A 25 million and employed many people from the local region. Mr Phillips was prosecuted under the Nature Conservation Act 1992(Qld) sealed with The Public Seal of The State of Queensland © The State of Queensland 1992, for allegedly shooting native wildlife on his farm to protect his fish though no evidence of such occurrences were found only the skeletal remains of two unidentified birds. It must be noted that offences under this Act can only occur on protected areas, Mr Phillips land was privately owned freehold land – therefore there was no criminal offence. (Refer) Nature Conservation Act 1992 PART 10 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Division 1 - Proceedings and offences generally 160 Evidentiary provisions (1) This section applies to any proceeding under or in relation to this Act.

(5) A statement in a complaint starting the proceeding of any of the following matters is evidence of the matters -

(a) that the matter of the complaint came to the knowledge of the complainant on a specified day;

(b) that specified wildlife is a specified class of wildlife under this Act; (c) that the whole or any part of -

(i) the progeny, larvae, pupae, eggs or genetic or reproductive material of an animal; or (ii) the carcass or another part of an animal; or (iii) the flowers, seeds or genetic or reproductive material of a plant;

is, or is from, specified wildlife or a specified class of wildlife. (d) that wildlife is indigenous to Australia or Queensland;

(e) that the place where the offence was committed was in a specified protected area or in a specified zone in a specified protected area.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 8 of 32 List of court cases

(6) In a proceeding for an offence that an act or omission was committed in a protected area, it is not necessary to prove the particular protected area in which the offence was committed.

Mr Phillips T/A Nino Pty Ltd was bankrupted under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and lost his land, his business and his home. Re: Employees at “Barramundi Waters” fish farm at Cowley Beach and Employed by CRIS BRIAN PHILLIPS (Director NINO PTY LTD) 15 May 2005 Rue & Fanna v Leavy [2005] QDC 110 Sarah Bradley DCJ. 26 August 2005 Phillips v Spencer & Anor [2005] QCA 317 de Jersey CJ., McMurdo P. and Jerrard JA. 7 October 2005 Fanna v Leavy; Rue v Leavy [2005] QCA 378 Mc Murdo P., McPherson J and Douglas J. Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay. GREGORY WILSON 10 Bruce Street, Torquay, Queensland Mr Wilson was prosecuted for allegedly clearing native vegetation on his grazing property. The area allegedly cleared was on a creek bank and he was repairing land degradation and severe erosion caused by flooding and feral pigs. The warrant was for the offence under s4.3.1.(1) under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 which states: ‘A person must not start an assessable development without a development approval.’ Integrated Planning Act 1997 Division 4 - Offence proceedings in Magistrates Court 4.3.18 Proceedings for offences (1) A person may bring a proceeding in a Magistrates Court on a

complaint to prosecute another person for an offence against this part.

(2) The person may bring the proceeding whether or not any right of

the persons has been, or may be, infringed by, or because of, the commission of the offence.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 9 of 32 List of court cases

(3) However, proceedings may only be brought by the assessing authority for an offence under -

(a) section 4.3.1, 4.3.2, or 4.3.3 about the Standard Building Regulation; or

(b) section 4.3.2A, 4.3.7, 4.3.15 or 4.3.16. The offence for which Gregory Wilson was charged was not about a Standard Building Regulation, he was in fact carrying out normal land management practices for the benefit of the environment and the productivity of his private land by preventing and restoring areas of land suffering from land degradation and erosion. The Magistrate did not query the validity or the relevance of the sections of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 used to prosecute Mr Wilson by the authorized officers being public servants of The State of Queensland. 24 August 2005 Wilson v Raddatz [2005] QDC Brabazon DCJ, QC; Coram

3 October 2007 Wilson v Raddatz [2007] HCA Trans 558 Gummow J. and Kiefel J. Special Leave dismissed Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay. GREGORY WILSON of 10 Bruce Street, Torquay, Queensland – Council Rates. 4 July 2013 WILSON’S DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 065 813 873) MR ANDREW BRIAN CEO FRASER COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL (ABN 19 277 850 689)

THE HON DESLEY BOYLE MP, MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER PARTNERSHIPS (ABN 65 959 415 158) Before:K.T. Savage, A/Registrar

KEITH RONALD GLASGOW AND LESLEY KAY GLASGOW Mr Glasgow was prosecuted under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the Integrated Planning Act 1997 for allegedly clearing native vegetation when Mr Glasgow pushed down trees which were used to feed his cattle during a time of severe drought. Mr

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 10 of 32 List of court cases

Glasgow was charged under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and the provision he was charged under was about a Standard Building Regulation. When swearing out the Warrant to Enter on Oath before the Magistrate T G Bradshaw on the 13th Day of January 2003, the respondent Peter Thomas Hall a public servant employed by The State of Queensland swore that the address to search for evidence of the offence under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 section 33 was:

'Details of the Place (2) Lot 52 RP912769 "Valentine Plains" Parish of Callide near Calliope Qld, a rural property and buildings thereon'

The address on the Warrant to Enter which was sworn before the Magistrate is incorrect and it was not the described property over which the Warrant was executed. The property described on the warrant -'Valentine Plains' is approximately 17 kilometres east of Mr. and Mrs. Glasgow’s property, is in the Parish of Callide, near Calliope, Qld is a totally separate property and not owned by Mr. and Mrs. Glasgow. Mr. and Mrs. Glasgow’s property is known as ‘Bayfield’ in the Parish of Kroombit, near Biloela, Qld. However this glaring discrepancy was ‘allowed’ by the Magistrate. Further:

i) The grounds of the Warrant to Enter sworn before Magistrate T.G.Bradshaw on 22nd January 2003 by the Second Respondent Peter Thomas Hall clearly shows that the only evidence upon which the Warrant was based was from remotely sensed imagery of clearing on the Appellant's land.

Application to ground warrant to enter a place, sworn and signed by Peter Thomas Hall 13th January 2003.

Refer:

iii) Vegetation Management Act 1999 PART 4 - APPEALS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Division 3 - Proceedings 68 Summary proceedings for offences (1) A proceeding for an offence against this Act, or for a

vegetation clearing offence, must be taken in a summary way under the Justices Act 1886

(2) ………………… (6) A vegetation clearing offence does not come to the

complainant's knowledge merely because the complainant

(2) Describe the Place (lot/plan/parish)

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 11 of 32 List of court cases

receives a remotely sensed image that may provide evidence of the offence.

Despite this section of the Vegetation Management Act 1999 being brought to the Magistrate’s attention he allowed the prosecution to continue. The warrant was for the offence under s4.3.1.(1) under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 which states: ‘A person must not start an assessable development without a development approval.’ Integrated Planning Act 1997 Division 4 - Offence proceedings in Magistrates Court 4.3.18 Proceedings for offences (1) A person may bring a proceeding in a Magistrates Court on a

complaint to prosecute another person for an offence against this part.

(2) The person may bring the proceeding whether or not any right of

the persons has been, or may be, infringed by, or because of, the commission of the offence.

(3) However, proceedings may only be brought by the assessing

authority for an offence under - (a) section 4.3.1, 4.3.2, or 4.3.3 about the Standard Building

Regulation; or (b) section 4.3.2A, 4.3.7, 4.3.15 or 4.3.16. 2 March 2006 Glasgow v Hall [2006] QDC 042 Nase DCJ. 2 March 2006 Glasgow v Hall [2006] QDC 478 Nase DCJ.

2 February 2007 Glasgow v Hall [2007] QCA 19 McMurdo P., Jerrard JA and Holmes JA. 3 October 2007 Glasgow v Hall [2007] HCA Trans 557 Gummow J. and Kiefel J. Special Leave dismissed Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 12 of 32 List of court cases

SHANE ANDREW WATTS Mr Watts was prosecuted under the Water Act 2000 for clearing native vegetation on his private land whilst laying a length of poly pipe some 5 meters under a dry creek bed to take water to a paddock where the last remaining pasture holding feed was available for his cattle during a time of severe drought.

Re: Lot 25, RP DK 276 Collinsville, Queensland 7 March 2006 Watts v Ellis [2006] QDC 056 C.F. Wall Q.C. 23 July 2007 Watts v Ellis [2007] QCA 07-234 Williams and Jerrard JJA. and Mullins J. WILLIAM ALEXANDER LADE Re: Valuation of Land

23 May 2007 Lade v Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water [2007] QLC 0400

Member of the Land Court Mr R.P. Scott WILLIAM ALEXANDER LADE Mr Lade was made bankrupt by Donald Black and the courts of The State of Queensland. Mr and Mrs Lade were on an extended holiday at the time the advice of the hearing was made available to them and despite Mr Lade, whilst still out of the State, placing the amount of the outstanding debt in a trust account in the court and advising the Judge of same.

18 August 2008 Donald John Black v Lade & Co. Pty Ltd. SC 82/08

20th October 2008 Lade & Co Pty Ltd wound up in insolvency William Lade & Lade & Co Pty Ltd

Order: Cullinane J. The winding up of the Respondent be terminated with effect from 24 October 2008. Initiating document: Application filed 2 September 2008.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 13 of 32 List of court cases

ROHAN BRIEN BOSWORTH Dallachy Creek, Cardwell, Queensland. Prosecuted under the Nature Conservation Act 1992(Qld) and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwth) for using electric grids to repel flying foxes who were destroying the ripe lychee fruit prior to harvest. In the Nature Conservation Act 1992, Part 10 – Legal Proceedings

(5) A statement in a complaint stating the proceeding of any of the following matters is evidence of the matters:

(e) That the place where the offence was committed was in a specified protected area or in a specified protected zone in a specified protected area.

The alleged offences for which Mr Bosworth was prosecuted and convicted were on his privately owned registered real property – his farm. Mr Bosworth owned the largest lychee orchard of 10,000 mature trees in far north Queensland and employed up to 250 seasonal workers from his local region. Lychee trees take ten years to reach full maturity and Mr Bosworth’s father had planted the orchard in the late 1970’s. The information gained for these prosecutions by Carol Jeanette Booth were gained mainly during trespasses on the privately owned farm during night hours unknown to the owners of the land. Carol Jeanette Booth had no equity or standing in the business owned and run by Mr Bosworth or in his property. Mr Bosworth has since removed most of his mature lychee trees, planted in 1978 and now grows other annual crops and sugar cane and thus does not require seasonal workers from the region. 3 December 2004 Bosworth v Booth [2004] FCA 1623 Kiefel J. Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay. MERVYN MEYER THOMAS, PAMELA ANN THOMAS FRIPPERY PTY LTD, 376 Volk Road, Mutarnee, Queensland Prosecution by Carol Jeanette Booth for ‘killing’ flying foxes to protect their lychee fruit. Mr Thomas is a qualified electrical engineer and had perfected a non lethal grid system which only gave the wildlife a slight shock – it did not kill them. No evidence of dead animals was found but the prosecutions were upheld by the judiciary of The State of

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 14 of 32 List of court cases

Queensland under their statutory laws. Carol Jeanette Booth had no standing on the property or in the business.

6 December 2006 Directions Hearing Supreme Court of Queensland

RICHARD GEORGE YARDLEY, ANTJE GESINA YARDLEY Re: Lot 1 RP712412, County of Nares, Parish of Bellenden Ker, Queensland Mr and Mrs Yardley were certified A Grade Organic Tropical Fruit farmers with markets both nationally and internationally for their produce. They were prosecuted by Carol Jeanette Booth for killing flying foxes on their electric grid system and Mrs Yardley was at home alone when Commonwealth public officials and officials of The State of Queensland raided their home and searched through their property, including their private clothing and belongings looking for ‘dead and dying’ flying foxes. The Police Service attended with the public servants only to ensure there was no breach of the peace and informed Mrs Yardley that she would be prosecuted if she tried to stop the invasion of her home under warrants, which as it turned out, had expired three weeks earlier. (When this was brought to the attention of the judicial member presiding he ignored it and classified it as a typographical error only). Carol Jeanette Booth had no standing in or on the property or shares in the business. The certified A Grade organic tropical fruit farm which took 25 years of concerted effort on the part of Mr and Mrs Yardley to create is no longer productive and has stopped operation since 2006. The electric grids and poles were cut down at the insistence of Carol Jeanette Booth under an order of Judge WILSON SC. Mrs Yardley at the time and still to this day suffers from extreme trauma from these actions by untrained, unqualified and unsworn public servants invading and searching through her personal living area, property and belongings. 3 November 2006 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2006] QPEC 116 Michael Rackemann DCJ. 30 November 2006 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2006] QPEC 119 Alan Wilson SC, DCJ.

8 February 2008 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2008] QPEC 5 Alan Wilson SC, DCJ. 25 November 2008 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2008] QPEC 100 Alan Wilson SC, DCJ. Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 15 of 32 List of court cases

JOHN ROSS HUDSON AND LYNNETTE ADA HUDSON John Ross Hudson was prosecuted by the Director General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change for clearing native vegetation/trees from an area where a Class 4 noxious weed – Lippia from an area beside a watercourse, a channel on his grazing property ‘Yarrol’ in New South Wales was growing rampant over the native vegetation. The New South Wales DPI 'prime facts' publication defines Class 4 weeds are 'plants that pose a threat to primary production, the environment or human health'. Lippia was originally planted by the officers of the NSW government to control erosion on the banks of watercourses. It did in fact do the reverse and the weed destroys the banks of watercourses and is spread rapidly, especially at time of heavy rain and flood as it is dispersed through the flood water and carried far and wide to other areas. John Hudson was in discussion with an officer of the NSW Government about what he planned to do to control the weed which destroys pasture and takes over an area, even eventually killing mature trees. John Hudson worked with a Departmental official, Liz Savage, who had asked John if he would leave a 20 metre buffer zone on either side of the channel but John advised that he would leave a 200 metre buffer zone which he did voluntarily for the benefit of leaving more trees and vegetation for the wildlife. John had also spoken to other Departmental officials on how to rid the area of lippia and was told there was only one way and that was to clear all the land, plough it and plant a crop for 2-3 years and then return it to native pastures- this being done for sustainable agriculture. John and Lynnette Hudson were invaded at two of their properties- one in NSW and one in Queensland- by officers of the Department of Environment and Climate Change and Police officers who, when they wished to enter the private properties informed John and Lynnette Hudson that they could not stop them and forced their entry into the private homes using Search Warrants under Section 413 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and a Monitoring Warrant under Section 409 of the EPBC Act. The farm workers at the properties were questioned by these officers who proceeded to ask them questions about the Hudson’s business. The Hudson’s personal and business diaries which contained taxation and information about the daily running of their businesses along with taxation invoices from the office computer were seized and the originals have not been returned. A Remediation Notice was placed over the land and when the public servants wished to check that the requirements of the notice over ‘Yarrol’ were being adhered to – if the gates were locked they simply cut the padlocks of the gates or cut the fences to allow their vehicles access. It must be noted that this is a grazing property for cattle owned by

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 16 of 32 List of court cases

Mr and Mrs Hudson and the Remediation Notice is still in place over the land. The Lippia is growing in abundance and Mr and Mrs Hudson can do nothing with their privately owned grazing property but let it deteriorate under the statutory laws of The State of New South Wales.

The Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management issued a Press Release on 24 January 2005. The first sentence in this release states:-

'A toxic weed has escaped from the city to threaten millions of hectares of Australia's prime floodland pasture in the Murray Darling Basin and cause river banks to collapse.'

"It is highly competitive and forms a dense mat on floodplains and river banks," says Mic Julien, a CSIRO researcher with the Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management. "Once you've got it, it's almost impossible to eradicate." …….."Lippia is almost certainly allelopathic: that is, it secretes toxic substances which inhibit other competing plants, possibly including tree seedlings."

The matter was taken to the Land and Environment Court of NSW – refer:-

Director-General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change v Hudson [2009] NSWLEC 4 (11 February 2009).

Joly Pty Ltd v Director-General of the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water [2009] NSWLEC 217 18 December 2009

This matter was first heard before Judge Lloyd in a Coram. The matter is still before the Australian Courts and Mr. and Mrs. Hudson are using barristers and solicitors inside the Australian Court System to try and have the matter resolved in their favour and the fine of $A 400.000.00 dismissed. To date this has not occurred, even though the first court case I put before Judge Lloyd was determined in a Coram. STEPHEN WILLIAM EDWARD AH SHAY AND SUSAN MARY AH SH AY Re: Rates for property situated at:-

Henderson Drive, Currajah Ll RP710885 & L1-3 SP218654 & L3 NR6282 & L1 SP1569/1 & L202 SP 156971 & L2 SP218654 & L3 SP218654

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 17 of 32 List of court cases

Re: Cassowary Coast Regional Council – ats- Stephen William Edward Ah Shay and Susan Mary Ah Shay – Supreme Court Claim No. 31 of 2010.

27 April 2010 Stephen William Edwqrd Ah Shay & Susan Mary Ah Shay V Mr Terry Brennan, CEO, Cassowary Coast Regional Council (ABN 20 889 787 211) and The Hon Desley Boyle MP, Minister for Local Government and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships (ABN 65 959 415 158) Justice P. Lyons

The matter resulting in the bankruptcy proceedings taken against Mr and Mrs Ah Shay originated in a matter taken to the Supreme Court of Queensland by John and Rhonda Chizzotti regarding an easement over the privately owned property of Mr and Mrs Ah Shay. The original easement placement was agreed upon between all parties in the original contract but was altered due to an error in communication between the legal practitioners retained by Mr and Mrs Chizzotti and Mr and Mrs Chizzotti. This error was not acknowledged by the presiding judge in the Supreme court of Queensland who did not believe Mr Ah Shay’s version of events and allowed the altered placement of the easement over Mr Ah Shay’s privately owned farming property. The court ordered that Mr and Mrs Ah Shay pay the court costs and the legal fees of Mr and Mrs Chizzotti. Mr Ah Shay did not do so and the result was that bankruptcy proceedings were taken out by Martin Treston of Murray Lyons Solicitors on behalf of Mr and Mrs Chizzotti and their property is now under the ‘management’ of trustees. The Sequestration Order of the Judge of the Federal Circuit Court in Cairns showed the ‘Applicants creditor’s costs including reserved costs be fixed in the sum of $A 7,139.00’.

6 September 2010 Order of A/Registrar dated 6 September 2010 under Certificate of the Costs Assessor filed on 6th day of September 2010 for sum of $A 7,904.05

25 August 2011 SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND Cairns Registry No. 355/2010

John and Rhonda Chizzotti –v- Stephen William Edward Ah Shay and Susan Mary Ah Shay and State of Queensland by the Registrar of Land Titles Hon. Justice Jones AO Order signed by Registrar of court.

23 October 2012 John and Rhonda Chizzotti –v- Stephen William Edward Ah

Shay and Susan Mary Ah Shay and State of Queensland by the Registrar of Land Titles

Order of the court before Registrar Re: Certificate of Costs Assessor

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 18 of 32 List of court cases

26 June 2013 Application for Bankruptcy filed by Martin Treston of Murray Lyons Solicitors on behalf of John Jeffrey Chizzotti and Rhonda Chizzotti against Stephen William Edward Ah Shay and Susan Mary Ah Shay for the sum of $A7,139.00.

5 September 2013 Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Cairns –

Judge J. WILLIS signed and sealed the Order.

“Sequestration Order made against the Estate of Stephen William Edward Ah Shay and the Estate of Susan Mary Ah Shay The Applicants creditor’s costs including reserved costs be fixed in the sum of $A 7,139.00 and paid from the Estate of the Respondent debtors in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). ‘The Court notes the date of the act of bankruptcy is for Stephen William Edwards Ah Shay; 27 April 2013 and the date of the act of bankruptcy is for Susan Mary Ah Shay; 24 May 2013.”

I note that Mr and Mrs Ah Shay were bankrupted for the sum of $A7,139.00. The fees to enforce the bankruptcy for the Trustees, the Solicitors etc. have cost Mr and Mrs Ah Shay $A 286,000.00, in Australian currency, not being ‘of the Commonwealth’. Thus far, for an ‘alleged’ bankruptcy of $A7.139.00, Mr and Mrs Ah Shay have been charged almost $A300,000.00 out of their private savings which the Public Trustee removed from their bank account under his ‘authority’. FINLAY JAMES COCKS, VALERIE GERTRUDE COCKS Prosecuted for clearing native vegetation on their privately owned grazing property and each fined $A65,539.66 which is a total of $A131,079.32 plus costs for ‘no case to answer’. ‘Diamond Dee’ Parkes Road, Duaringa Queensland 4712

20 October 2010 Adjourned File No. MAG-00106068/10(1) Application forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay. Mrs Valerie Gertrude Cocks, had a very small bank account with approximately $1,000 in that bank account which she was saving for her infant grandchild. The State Penalties Enforcement Registry (SPER) a statutory entity of The State of Queensland, without advising Mrs Cocks, withdrew $A800.00 out of that account for part payment of her

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 19 of 32 List of court cases

‘fine’ of $A65,539.66 imposed by a Magistrate, (not a Stipendiary Magistrate) on ‘no case to answer’. Correspondence from Finlay Cocks, dated 28th January 2014 forwarded to the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, Australian Taxation Office.

Your Ref: 8010205090820 Cheryl-Lea Field, Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, GPO Box 9990, Brisbane, Queensland 4000

Dear Madam,

RE: MR FINLAY J. COCKS, DIAMOND DEE, PARKES ROAD, D UARINGA.

I refer to your taxation account dated 10 January 2014, where your require the entity FINLAY COCKS to pay the amount of $A1,192.20 in Australian currency, not being the legal tender of The Commonwealth of Australia – pounds, shillings and pence.

Correspondence from Finlay Cocks, dated 5th February 2014 forwarded to the Australian Electoral Commission.

J. Donnelly, Divisional Returning Officer, Division of Flynn, Level 1, Centrepoint Building, 136 Goondoon St., Gladstone, Qld. 4680

Dear Sir,

I refer to your unsigned correspondence to me dated 24 January 2014 with regard to my ‘Apparent failure to vote’ unsigned by J. Donnelly.

COLIN UEBERGANG THE QUEEN V COLIN UEBERGANG

Date of sentence 1st October 1997 Imprisonment for two years.

THE QUEEN V COLIN UEBERGANG

[1998] QCA 019, C.A. No. 398 of 1997 Judgment 27 February 1998

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 20 of 32 List of court cases

Appeal against conviction was allowed and the conviction was set aside and a verdict of acquittal entered.

BRETT DEAN DEMPSEY

District Court at Cairns Certificate of Indictment Signed by Wendy Lee Baden, Registrar of the District Court at Cairns Sentence imposed 10 December 2001 for 2 counts: Count 1 – that Brett Dean Dempsey did a prohibited act, namely destroyed forest products whilst not holding a licence, permit or other authority. 12 months imprisonment

Count 2 – that Brett Dean Dempsey stole a quantity of trees the property of the Minister for Natural Resources for Queensland. 12 months imprisonment.

THE QUEEN V. BRETT DEAN DEMPSEY

[2002] QCA 45, C.A. No. 358 of 2001 Judgment 22/02/2002 – Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused.

Request for review forwarded to Judicial Committee of Privy Council, London on 2nd January 2011 and refused to statutory law by Ms Jackie Lindsay BRETT DEAN DEMPSEY prosecuted for non payment of rates. The property in question is a block of land with no access to the property provided by the Hinchinbrook Shire Council which still refuse him lawful access to the land. BRETT DEAN DEMPSEY Paluma Trading Pty Ltd (ACN 124883530 Trustee under (Director T/A) Instrument 710810553) Hinchinbrook Shire Council ENFORCEMENT HEARING SUMMONS Amount Outstanding: $2,803.15 9th July 2013

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 21 of 32 List of court cases

DAVID JOHN WALTER David John Walter was issued with an injunction brought against him by the Legal Services Commissioner of Dept of Justice and Attorney General of The State of Queensland which prevents Mr Walter from appearing in any court of The State of Queensland or assisting persons in proceedings before any courts of The State of Queensland.

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND Legal Services Commissioner v Walter [2011] QSC 132

DAVID JOHN WALTER AND LYNETTE DIANE WALTER Correspondence dated 5th March 2012 written by David John Walter to Her Majesty the Queen “re money borrowed and money held – that money not being the legal tender currency of the Commonwealth of Australia and held inside the BANKING ACT 1959 to AUSTRALIA’S CONSTITUTION 1900”. Correspondence from P D GARRETT LEGAL COSTS CONSULTANT, dated 11 July 2012 Re: FRANKS & ORS –ats-LADE (S12/2010) addressed to King & Company, Solicitors advising them that after his assessments of the costs payable, Mr William Alexander Lade and Mr David John Walter were to pay to King & Company $A26,860.98 pursuant to an Order of the Registrar dated 17 May 2012. DAVID JOHN WALTER AND LYNETTE DIANE WALTER Non payment of rates to Tableland Regional Council Enforcement Hearing against Lynette Diane Walter on 2 May 2013 in the Magistrates Court Atherton ENFORCEMENT HEARING WARRANT Filed by S J Gurnsey & Company Solicitors On behalf of Tablelands Regional Council For the arrest of Lynette Diane Walter for non attendance at Magistrates Court.

19 August 2013 TAX INVOICE/RECEIPT Payment of overdue rates to Tablelands Regional Council plus legal fees for S.J.Gurnsey, Solicitors - $A2,151.64

8 July 2013 STATEMENT OF CLAIM Filed in the Atherton Registry of the Magistrates Court of Queensland by Jones King Lawyers, Solicitor

For overdue rates for the sum of $A1,648.14.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 22 of 32 List of court cases

NOTICE AS TO DEFENCE Total amount of Plaintiff’s Claim $A2359.63

Note: Under the Notice as to Defence the Claim by the Plaintiffs is $A1684.14 (not $A1648.14) CLAIM

MAGISTRATES COURT OF QUEENSLAND Registry No. 0050096/13 The plaintiff claims: The sum of $A1,648.14

‘being moneys owing for outstanding rates and/or related fees and charges’ MAGISTRATES COURT OF QUEENSLAND Registry No. 0050096/13 JUDGMENT Before Registrar of the Magistrates Court, Atherton THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT IS THAT the Defendant/s DAVID JOHN WALTER AND LYNETTE DIANE WALTER pay to the Plaintiff the amount of $A2430.72 including $0.00 interest to today and $A782.58 costs. Signed: Signature not required for electronically lodged documents

Correspondence received from JONES KING LAWYERS dated 9 October 2013. (Signed by JONES KING LAWYERS – [Jones King] not any actual person, advising us of the ‘enforcement options’ available to ‘our client at law’:

1. Enforcement Hearing Summons 2. Redirection of Earnings 3. Enforcement Warrant – Seizure and Sale of

Property 4. Bankruptcy

Correspondence received from KING & COMPANY signed [King and Company] not by with the name of an actual person and dated 11 March 2014 re:

BANKRUPTCY NOTICE FOR FINAL ORDER – FRANKS & ANOR – ATS- W A LADE, SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CLAIM NO. S12 OF 2010.

In this correspondence, ‘Partner Responsible, Mark Williams’ advises me that ‘We enclose, the Bankruptcy Notice, by way of service. Should you fail to comply with the

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 23 of 32 List of court cases

Bankruptcy Notice, we are instructed to immediately commence bankruptcy proceedings against you”. Note: I was classed as a ‘non-party to the matter’. LINDSAY ARTHUR MAYNES AND SUSAN LINDA MAYNES This matter originated when Mr and Mrs Maynes asked their local government council to validate their authority to charge rates. No answer was received. Mr and Mrs Maynes place No Trespass signs on the access to their farm but these were ignored by the process server sent out by the Council. The process server was asked to leave the property four times which he ignored, followed the owners on to their land and used bad language in speaking to them. Mr and Mrs Maynes sued Geoffrey John Casey (lawyer for the Local Council) and Samuel Ian Casey (process server) for trespass. The Judge in the District Court of New South Wales Judge MARGARET SIDIS presided. The Judge overturned the rulings used by Mr and Mrs Maynes to support their matter, decided that their sign was not sufficiently constructed or placed to be in full view, believed the defendant – the trespasser had left their land promptly when first asked to do so, decided that Mr and Mrs Maynes were not telling the truth and ordered that Mr and Mrs Maynes pay the defendants costs under her unsigned order. The legal practitioners acting for the Casey’s have taken an action to recover their costs of $A141,000.00. A sequestration order was issued from the Federal Magistrates Court of New South Wales which was not signed and not sealed. The legal team for the Casey’s appointed trustees have placed their names on the title deeds to the land, won a case in the Supreme Court of NSW for adverse possession against Mr and Mrs Maynes who were evicted from their family farm which they have owned for four decades on 8th October 2013. It must be noted that Mr and Mrs Maynes have owned their farm for almost forty years, and the farm is valued at $A1.25 million dollars. It is divided into twelve portions, each one of which would have covered the cost of the outstanding lawyers account of $A141,000.00, however the ‘judicial system’ and the ‘legal practitioners’ involved in this ‘legal proceeding’ ‘however acquired’ the entire farm owned by Mr and Mrs Maynes under their statutory laws.

23 December 2010 Maynes & Ors v Casey & Ors [2010] NSWDC 285 Sidis DCJ

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 24 of 32 List of court cases

1 November 2012 Geoffrey John Casey and Samuel Ian Casey v Lindsay Arthur Maynes and Susan Lindsay Maynes Federal Magistrates Court of Australia at Sydney File Number: SYG1869/2012 Registrar Tesoriero

9 July 2013 Supreme Court of New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Pascoe v Maynes [2013] NSWSC 918 Schmidt J. EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT ‘the plaintiffs seek possession of a property located at Woodstock in the Cowra Shire of New South Wales’

There is no actual address or identification of where or what the property is that the plaintiffs seek possession of in this Ex Tempore Judgment. Refer to the Ex Tempore Judgment of Schmidt J. where at page 2 paragraph 9 it refers to the address ‘Berkeley, XXXXXXXXX Road, Woodstock, NSW. The wrong property was seized and Mr and Mrs Maynes were evicted by an officer of the New South Wales Police Service acting as the Sheriff, on 8th October 2013 under the statutory laws of The State of New South Wales – Medium Neutral Citation Hearing- Judgment not signed or sealed. The farm still lawfully owned by Mr and Mrs Maynes under the common law of England and the laws of church and state has since been sold by the liquidators at a price of one third of the current market value for the farm. MAREE ELIZABETH BOWEN AND ROB BOWEN Mrs Maree Elizabeth Bowen had a Judgment brought against her in an Application by the Australia and New Zealand Banking Corporation and she and her husband Rob were asked to vacate their home as the bank was to take possession of the property as they were in arrears in their home repayments due to their ill health. Mr Rob Bowen, a qualified plumber has suffered three strokes, has had a triple bypass heart operation and was at the hospital for required treaments at the time they were to vacate their home and Mrs Bowen had suffered a nervous breakdown and was seriously ill. They had tried, through discussions with the Australia and New Zealand Banking Corporation and the legal profession to come to some amicable agreement between all parties to resolve the situation, in consideration of the fact that they had both suffered severe reversals in their health and financial positions. Neither the bank nor the legal profession were in agreement with this.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 25 of 32 List of court cases

An Enforcement Officers Notice was issued to Maree Elizabeth Bowen ordering her to ‘vacate the premises n later than Sunday 26th May 2013 at 4pm’. This notice was ‘deferred as you have entered negotiations with the Australia and New Zealand Bank’. On 12 June it was ascertained that ‘negotiations had failed and to execute the warrant as soon as possible’. ‘This execution will be carried out on Monday the 15th July 2013 at 11.00am.’ The Bailiff as Enforcement Officer, a public service entity employed by the ‘Supreme and District Court Rockhampton, Distict Court Emerald Bailiff & Magistrates Court Bailiff for Biloela, Blackwater, Clermont Emerald including the enties of the Queensland police service, came to the privately owned property of Mr and Mrs Bowen at the designated time and commenced to remove the personal property of Mr and Mrs Bowen which they took away to an unknown destination for, one assumes, storage. The warrant executed was for the house and land only, not for personal possessions though this fact was ignored by the public service entities. They removed the entire contents of the house and the shed, including Mr Bowen’s tools of trade, their personal clothing and shoes and their medication from the bathroom cabinet. Mr Bowen had just returned from the hospital, was in a wheelchair as he was unable to walk unaided and was dressed only in underclothes and a hospital bathrobe and without shoes and the public service entities would not allow him to get dressed or obtain a pair of his shoes during their execution of the warrant. It must be noted here that items removed from the house included the medications which Mr and Mrs Bowen had had prescribed for them by a medical practitioner and which they were not allowed to recover. It is unknown at this time where Mr and Mrs Bowen are though I have received one phone call from them advising me they were alright but still in fear of arrest/imprisonment so were telling no one where they were. Court Cases in Chronological Order:- 1st October 1997 The Queen v Colin Uebergang Sentence – two years imprisonment 27 February 1998 Colin Uebergang v The Queen [1998] QCA 019; C.A. No. 398 of 1997 Davies, J.A.; McPherson J.A.; Moynihan J.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 26 of 32 List of court cases

Appeal against conviction was allowed and the conviction was set aside and a verdict of acquittal entered.

10 December 2001 Brett Dean Dempsey v The Queen Imprisonment for two years 22 February 2002 The Queen v. Brett Dean Dempsey [2002] QCA 45; C.A. 358 of 2001 Davies, J.A.; McPherson J.A; Williams JA Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused 12 April 2002 Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA 120 McPherson and Williams JJA and Byrne J Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. 31 January 2003 Peter Farquharson & Sandra Dack v Dairy Adjustment Authority No. Q2001/297, Q2001/307 Administrative Appeals Tribunal - Senior Member KL Beddoe 25 June 2003 Bone Mothershaw B29/2002 [2003]HCATrans 829 (25 June 2003) 17 September 2004 Dore v State of Queensland & Anor [2004] QDC 364 Sarah Bradley DCJ. 19 November 2004 Burns v State of Queensland [2004] QSC 434 de Jersey CJ. 3 December 2004 Bosworth v Booth [2004] FCA 1623 Kiefel J. 15 May 2005 Rue & Fanna v Leavy [2005] QDC 110 Sarah Bradley DCJ. 24 August 2005 Wilson v Raddatz [2005] QDC Brabazon DCJ. 26 August 2005 Phillips v Spencer & Anor [2005] QCA 317 de Jersey CJ., McMurdo P. and Jerrard JA. 7 October 2005 Fanna v Leavy; Rue v Leavy [2005] QCA 378 Mc Murdo P., McPherson J and Douglas J. 2 March 2006 Glasgow v Hall [2006] QDC 042 Nase DCJ. 2 March 2006 Glasgow v Hall [2006] QDC 478 Nase DCJ.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 27 of 32 List of court cases

7 March 2006 Watts v Ellis [2006] QDC 056 C.F. Wall Q.C. 5 May 2006 Dore & Ors v Penny [2006] QSC 125 Jones J. 23 June 2006 Burns v State of Queensland & Croton [2006] QCA 235 Jerrard JA., Cullinane and Jones JJ. 3 November 2006 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2006] QPEC 116 Michael Rackemann DCJ. 30 November 2006 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2006] QPEC 119 Alan Wilson SC, DCJ. 2 February 2007 Glasgow v Hall [2007] QCA 19 McMurdo P., Jerrard JA and Holmes JA. 23 May 2007 Lade v Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water [2007]

QLC 0400 Member of the Land Court Mr R.P. Scott 23 July 2007 Watts v Ellis [2007] QCA 07-234 Williams and Jerrard JJA. and Mullins J. 27 July 2007 Burns v State of Queensland & Croton [2007] QCA 240 Jerrard JA., Cullinane and Jones JJ. 3 October 2007 Wilson v Raddatz [2007] HCA Trans 558 Gummow J. and Kiefel J. Special Leave dismissed 3 October 2007 Glasgow v Hall [2007] HCA Trans 557 Gummow J. and Kiefel J. Special Leave dismissed 8 February 2008 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2008] QPEC 5 Alan Wilson SC, DCJ. 28 March 2008 Burns v State of Queensland & Croton [2008] HCASL 68 W.M.C. Gummow and S.M. Kiefel Special Leave dismissed

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 28 of 32 List of court cases

18 August 2008 Donald John Black v Lade & Co. Pty Ltd. SC 82/08 Lade & Co Pty Ltd wound up in insolvency 20th October 2008 William Lade & Lade & Co Pty Ltd

Order: Cullinane J. The winding up of the Respondent be terminated with effect from 24 October 2008. Initiating document: Application filed 2 September 2008.

25 November 2008 Booth v Yardley & Anor [2008] QPEC 100 Alan Wilson SC, DCJ. 11 February 2009 Director-General of the Department of Environment and Climate

Change v Hudson [2009] NSWLEC 4 (11 February 2009). 18 December 2009 Joly Pty Ltd v Director-General of the Department of

Environment, Climate Change and Water [2009] NSWLEC 217. 27 April 2010 Stephen William Edwqrd Ah Shay & Susan Mary Ah Shay

V Mr Terry Brennan, CEO, Cassowary Coast Regional Council (ABN 20 889 787 211) and The Hon Desley Boyle MP, Minister for Local Government and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships (ABN 65 959 415 158)

Justice P. Lyons 6 September 2010 Stephen William Edwqrd Ah Shay & Susan Mary Ah Shay

V Mr Terry Brennan, CEO, Cassowary Coast Regional Council (ABN 20 889 787 211) and The Hon Desley Boyle MP, Minister for Local Government and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships (ABN 65 959 415 158)

A/Registrar – Supreme Court Cairns 20 October 2010 Coome (DERM) v Finlay Cocks and Valerie Cocks - Adjourned 23 December 2010 Maynes & Ors v Casey & Ors [2010] NSWDC 285 Sidis DCJ 30 March 2011 THE QUEEN against IAN SYDNEY HENKE DA Mullins, J 27 May 2011 Legal Services Commissioner v Walter [2011] QSC 132 Daubney J.

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 29 of 32 List of court cases

6 June 2011 Coome (DERM) v Finlay Cocks and Valerie Cocks CD PRESS Magistrate 25 August 2011 John and Rhonda Chizzotti –v- Stephen William Edward Ah Shay

and Susan Mary Ah Shay and State of Queensland by the Registrar of Land Titles

The Hon Justice Jones AO Order signed by the Registrar of the court. 5th March 2012 David J. Walter - Letter to Her Majesty re legal tender currency of

the Commonwealth of Australia. What authority do the members of political parties, being entities created to statute law only in the Australian System of Government, not being of the Commonwealth, have to borrow, lend and utilize Australian currency which is not the legal tender of the Commonwealth of Australia.

23 October 2012 John and Rhonda Chizzotti –v- Stephen William Edward Ah Shay and Susan Mary Ah Shay and State of Queensland by the Registrar of Land Titles

Registrar 1 November 2012 Geoffrey John Casey and Samuel Ian Casey v Lindsay Arthur Maynes and Susan Linda Maynes Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, Sydney File No. SYG1869/2012 Registrar Tesoriero

Sequestration Order against the estate of Lindsay Arthur Maynes and Susan Linda Maynes

2 May 2013 LYNETTE DIANE WALTER v TABLELANDS REGIONAL COUNCIL

Enforcement Hearing – Atherton Magistrates Court No. M75/211 Issued by S.J.Gurnsey, Solicitors

1 6 MAY 2013 TABLELANDS REGIONAL COUNCIL v LYNETTE DIANE WALTER ENFORCEMENT HEARING WARRANT Issued by Registrar, Atherton Magistrates court for arrest of Lynette Diane Walter 4 July 2013 WILSON’S DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 065 813 873) v MR ANDREW BRIAN CEO FRASER COAST

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 30 of 32 List of court cases

REGIONAL COUNCIL (ABN 19 277 850 689) and THE HON DESLEY BOYLE MP, MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER PARTNERSHIPS (ABN 65 959 415 158)

9 July 2013 Brett Dean Dempsey T/A Paluma Trading Pty Ltd (ACN 124883530 Trustee under

Instrument 710810553) v V Hinchinbrook Shire Council 9 July 2013 Supreme Court of New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Pascoe v Maynes [2013] NSWSC 918 Before: Schmidt J.

18th July 2013 TABLELANDS REGIONAL COUNCIL (ABN 77642342175) DAVID JOHN WALTER AND LYNETTE DIANE WALTER Claim filed by Jones King Lawyers, Solicitor For payment of $A1648.14 for overdue rates Total amount of plaintiff’s Claim $A2,359.63 5 September 2013 John and Rhonda Chizzotti –v- Stephen William Edward Ah Shay

and Susan Mary Ah Shay Sequestration Order – Federal Circuit Court of Australia

Bankruptcy Application for Bankruptcy filed by Martin Treston of Murray Lyons Solicitors on behalf of John Jeffrey Chizzotti and Rhonda Chizzotti against Stephen William Edward Ah Shay and Susan Mary Ah Shay for the sum of $A7,139.00.

Judge J. Willis 25 September 2013 Tablelands Regional Council (ABN 77642342175)

V David John Walter and Lynette Diane Walter Registry No. 0050096/13 Registrar

Signature not required for electronically lodged documents.

15 October 2013 Australia Taxation Office F.J.Cocks & V.G.Cocks Your activity statement is now overdue.

Penalties for failing to lodge on time may apply to each document not lodged by the due date. Penalties range from $A100 to $A850.00

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 31 of 32 List of court cases

28th February 2014 Correspondence from Robert Bone to Australian Taxation Office. 28th February 2014 Correspondence from Robert Bone to Queensland Office of State

Revenue re land tax. 28th February 2014 Correspondence from Finlay Cocks to Australian Taxation Office. 5th February 2014 Correspondence from Finlay Cocks to Australian Electoral

Commission. 11 March 2014 Correspondence from KING & COMPANY to David John Walter

re BANKRUPTCY NOTICE FOR FINAL ORDER – FRANKS & ANOR – ATS- W A LADE – SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CLAIM NO. S12 OF 2010.

These matters are outstanding as at 11th March 2014. Relevant legislation: MABO AND OTHERS –V- THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND IN HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA KIRMANI v CAPTAIN COOK CRUISES PTY LTD (NO 2) [1985] HCA 27 Inter alia Australian Citizenship Act 1973, Act No. 99 of 1973 inter alia HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA ACT 1979; inter alia to the Privy Council (Limitation of Appeals) Act 1968 Act No. 36 of 1968 as Amended; inter alia to Privy Council (Appeals from the High Court) Act 1975 Act No. 33 of 1975; inter alia FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA ACT 1976; inter alia NATIVE TITLE (QUEENSLAND) ACT 1993 Reprinted as in force 2nd October 1998 (sealed with the Public Seal of ‘the State’ of Queensland © State of Queensland 1998); inter alia to the Native Title Act 1993 Act No. 110 of 1993 as Amended:- ‘The Parliament of Australia therefore enacts’; Inter alia A New Tax System ( Australian Business Number) Act 1999 No 84, 1999 as amended ‘The Parliament of Australia enacts’ inter alia Corporations (Repeals, Consequentials and Transitionals) Act 2001, Act No.55 of 2001 as amended:-The Parliament of Australia enacts inter alia to the Corporations Act 2001, refer -section 9 – Definition ‘Act includes thing’; inter alia to the CORPORATIONS AGREEMENT 2002 AS AMENDED inter alia Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Act 2010, No. 150, 2010 inter alia Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973 Act 161 of 1973 sealed © Commonwealth of Australia. inter alia to the Foreign Corporations (Application of Laws) Act 1989; inter alia to the International Criminal Court Act 2002: ‘The Parliament of Australia enacts’;

________________________________________________________________________ © David J. Walter March 2014 Page 32 of 32 List of court cases

inter alia to the Trusts (Hague Convention) Act 1991, Act No. 50 of 1991 inter alia Corporations Act 1989 Act No.109 of 1989 inter alia Corporations (Queensland) Act 1990 Reprinted as in force 7 June 1996 (includes amendments up to Act No.58 of 1995) sealed with Public Seal of Queensland © State of Queensland 2010 inter alia The Charter of the United Nations Act 1945, Act No. 32 of 1945 as amended, inter alia Geneva Conventions Act No.1o3 of 1957 as amended inter alia the CHARTER of the COMMONWEALTH inter alia Corporations (Sons of Gawlia) Amendment Act 2010, No.50 of 2010 ‘The Parliament of Australia Enacts’.