david lalman, adam mcgee, aksel wiseman, claire...

46
David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen

Page 2: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Photo Courtesy of Oklahoma State University

Where we are now

Page 3: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Today cattle have tremendous capacity for post-weaning growth and carcass weight

Photo Courtesy of Oklahoma State University

Page 4: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo
Page 5: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

2.8

3

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

AD

G,

lbs

Page 6: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

Car

cass

Wt,

lbs

Steers

Heifers

Cows

Page 7: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Reproduction

Page 8: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

83%

84%

85%

86%

87%

88%

89%

90%

91%

Source: Dr. Derrell Peel, Oklahoma State University

Page 9: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Where do we go from here?

If you are like me, and want to grab every opportunitythat comes your way, repeat after me:

The answer is YES!Now, what was the question?

Richard Branson

Page 10: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Selection and developmentof females that excel in fertility, lower cost of production, ANDmaintain post-weaning characteristics

Page 11: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Pendell et al., 2015 (KFMA data) 79 operations with data from 2010 through 2014

High profit 1/3 averaged $415 more net return per cow compared to low profit 1/3

32.2% difference due to gross income▪ Weaning weight

▪ Weaning rate

▪ Calf price

▪ Cull cow income

67.8% difference due to reduced cost

Page 12: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Pendell et al., 2015 (KFMA data)

1 pound of added weaning weight = $0.86 added cost per cow

234 weekly sale reports (2010 – 2014) from Oklahoma National Stockyards value of gain = $0.85 ± 0.33

Page 13: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo
Page 14: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Total Herd Reporting (THR) Stayability – improves cowherd efficiency

through reduced replacement rate Available for

Red Angus

Simmental

Simbrah

Gelbvieh

Limousin

Saler

Page 15: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Photo Courtesy of Oklahoma State University

Page 16: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Red Angus initiated THR and Stayability in 1995

Positive observation

▪ Must calve as a 2-yr-old

▪ Produce calf every year until at least 6

Negative observation

▪ Miss a calf / open

▪ Culled for soundness, production, disposition, BCS, etc.

Page 17: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

EPD

Six unit improvement is equivalent to:89% weaning rate in 1990 to 92% weaning rate in 2017

Red Angus

Gelbvieh

Simmental

Page 18: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

83%

84%

85%

86%

87%

88%

89%

90%

91%

Source: Dr. Derrell Peel, Oklahoma State University

Page 19: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo
Page 20: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Both bulls have 200 plus

daughters in production One bull has SCF = 39One bull has SCF = -6

Both bulls have over 270daughters in production

Given 100 2-yr-old daughters each, themore fertile bull has probability of 45 more 12-yr-old

daughters still in the herd 10 yr from now

Page 21: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo
Page 22: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

An

gu

s M

W E

PD

Her

efo

rd M

W E

PD

Hereford Angus

Page 23: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

MW

T E

PD

Birth Year

Page 24: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

1000

1050

1100

1150

1200

1250

1300

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Page 25: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

700 1200 1700 2200

We

an

ing

We

igh

t (l

b)

Cow BW (lb)

y = 0.0607x + 459

Each 100 lb cow weight increases cow costs by $35 to $45 annually

Page 26: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Photo Courtesy of Oklahoma State University

Page 27: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Kuhn and Thallman, 2015

Page 28: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Commercial Angus herd Spring calving Sire milk EPDs: above

breed avg Peak yield (May) = 31 lb

Page 29: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

y = 3.7456x + 73.602

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

13 15 17 19 21 23

Mai

nte

nan

ce E

ne

rgy,

ME/

kg B

W.7

5

Peak Milk Yield, lb/d

Ferrell and Jenkins (1987) and Montano-Bermudez et al. (1990)

10% more peak yield = 5% more MER

Page 30: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo
Page 31: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo
Page 32: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

y = 0.4801x + 9.4476R² = 0.5172

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36

Da

ily

Mil

k Y

ield

(lb

s.)

Daily DMI (lbs.)

DMI Influence on Milk Yield

lb feed : lb milk conversion is about 2:1

Page 33: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Increasing milk yield is relatively efficient

More milk = more weaning weight

Avg of 5 studies: 55 lbs milk per 1 lb added calf gain

How much feed to the cow? 2 * 55 = 110 lbs

Page 34: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Brown et al., 2005

Page 35: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Commercial Angus and H X A Fall calving Sire milk EPDs: below breed

avg Peak yield (November) Ang = 22 lbs Herf X Ang = 20 lbs

Page 36: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo
Page 37: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

What happens to cow maintenance costs with aggressive selection for

growth, gradual increases in cow size(primarily from increased visceral

organ mass), and genetic potential for milk?

Page 38: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

APPETITE

There is a limit to what your forage system can support

Page 39: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

y = 0.1954x - 0.6819R² = 0.6267

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Ave

rage

Dai

ly G

ain

, lb

Fee

d/G

ain

Dry Matter Intake, lb

Relaltionship Between DMI and Feed/Gain and ADG for 750 lb Steers at Hitch 1 (2013 - 2017)

1,018 LotsItem Mean RangeDeath Loss 2.01 0.00 - 7.55DMI 21.59 17.01 - 25.92ADG 3.54 2.60 - 4.83Feed/Gain 6.13 5.00 - 7.53

Source: Dr. Britt Hicks, 2018

Page 40: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

Angus Hereford

Page 41: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Growing cattle consuming high-quality concentrate or high-quality mixed diets

Positive relationship between DMI for concentrate and forage diets Foote et al., 2017: .51

Cassaday et al., 2016 .58 Little or negative relationship between

concentrate and forage ADG Foote et al., 2017 -.09

Cassaday et al., 2016 -.3

Page 42: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Breed Gain, lb/dSouth Devon 0.07

Angus 0.00

Hereford -0.11

Simmental -0..33

Charlolais -0..37

Red Angus -0..42

Beefmaster -0.44

Santa Gertrudis -0.55

Gelbvieh -0.55

Brangus -0.57

Limousin -0.77

Brahman -0.90

Page 43: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Breed DMI, lb/dSouth Devon -3.48

Beefmaster -3.44

Limousin -3.24

Brahman -2.97

Santa Gertrudis -2.29

Hereford -2.11

Charlolais -1.94

Gelbvieh -1.59

Red Angus -1.50

Brangus -1.30

Simmental -1.17

Angus 0.00

Page 44: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Breed EfficiencySouth Devon 0.200

Beefmaster 0.096

Hereford 0.090

Charlolais 0.030

Limousin 0.017

Santa Gertrudis 0.012

Angus 0.000

Red Angus -0.004

Simmental -0.004

Brahman -0.023

Gelbvieh -0.027

Brangus -0.049

Page 45: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Inputs have been adjusted to maintain a higher input cow herd

Fertility is beginning to improve and new tools will help

In MANY cases, modest negative pressure on milk production would improve the match to forage resources

DMI and Mature Cow Weight EPD’s are relatively new and beginning to have a positive impact

Matching cows to forage = MODERATE milk, growth, feed intake and mature size

With today’s tools there is no need to give up (go backwards) on post-weaning performance, carcass yield, or quality

Page 46: David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresenanimal.ifas.ufl.edu/beef_extension/bcsc/2018/ppt/lalman.pdf · David Lalman, Adam McGee, Aksel Wiseman, Claire Andresen. Photo

Photo Courtesy of Oklahoma State University