dccument resume author self-esteem for title · pdf filestanley coopersmith university of...

Download DCCUMENT RESUME AUTHOR Self-Esteem for TITLE · PDF fileStanley Coopersmith University of California, Davis. Gi "cn the limited times available I have Waded to (1Lculsi$ a few 1;opios

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: hoangkiet

Post on 06-Feb-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • ED 033 742

    AUTHORTITLE

    INSTITUTIONPub DateNote

    EDRS Price

    Descriptors

    DCCUMENT RESUME

    PS 001 949

    Ccopersmith, StanleyImplications cf Studies on Self-Esteem forEducational Research and Practice.Califcrnia Univ., Davis.6 Feb 6925p.; Paper presented at the meetings ofthe American Educational ResearchAsscciation, Los Angeles, California,February 6, 1969

    FDFS Price MF-$0.25 HC Not Available frcmEDRS.*Educational Strategies, LearningCharacteristics, Mctivaticn, PeerAcceptance, Psychological Characteristics,Psychological Needs, *PsychologicalStudies, Reinforcement, Self Ccncept,*Self Esteem, Self Reward, Stress Variables

    AbstractThe research of this author indicates that

    the development of high self-esteem (defined as thegood-bad dimension cf self-ccncept) is asscciated with (1)

    acceptance, (2) clearly defined limits and moderately high

    goals, and (3) respectful treatment.' Such factcts as

    status, income, and education are only related to high

    self-esteem if they are a part of an individual's personaldefinition of success. Since high self-esteem is correlated

    with need-achievement, which proves to be a self-fulfillingprophecy fcr success, and lcw self-esteem is correlatedwith fear cf failure, which proves to be a self-fulfillingprophecy fcr failure, it is clear that our educationaltechniques should fester high self-esteem. Further, it has

    been shown that (1) self-mctivaticn derives frcm seeing

    oneself develcp competency (through internal feedback, notsocial apprcval), (2), stringent but reasonable earlychallenges facilitate develcpment, and (3) the schoolsituaticn can either hurt a student's self-esteem cr equiphim with the mechanisms tc maintain it at a high level. Ourpresent educational system hinges on the anxiety-provoking,self-esteem _lowering reliance of the student cn theteacher's approval, grades, and attention. A preferablealternative would shift emphasis tc self-mctivaticn, based

    on high self-esteem. [Not available in hard ccpy due to

    marginal legibility cf original document.] (MH)

  • I. DEPARTRENT Of HEALTH, EDUCATION II WIIFNRECIRCE Of EDUCATION

    THIS' DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY PS RECEIVED F1,014 THEPERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW ON TIMMSSTATED OCI NOT taaSTARLY REPROKNI OfFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATIONMin* OR .

    ioiler pre4Jentod at Autricau Educbtional Research A6600iiti011

    (ALFA) Convert on held in Los Angeleo Pobruary 6, 1969.

    ""elf 'Concert Ret,eeroha /es licetiova fog thicatione"rr ayatpc4uum141

    CIIAA

    Implications of Studies on Self Eateem

    for Xducetional Resewmh sad Practice

    Stanley Coopersmith

    University of California, Davis

    Gi "cn the limited times available I have Waded to

    (1Lculsi$ a few 1;opios in some depth rancher than a multitude

    ct u sv.porfloittl level. This w5.al permit me to elaborate on

    invoortent ;opics related to chanding theories and praoticeb

    i4 eduost;iort and i the same time tiugi7;ei3t taz the schools shcal6

    conoorned bout fostering self odtoom sod how they should

    vr.:hieve thvt erd. preseatetlon, lIke Oault i divided

    iato throo parts. In the first I L5hall dice caso thu results

    c. E' 4y 4tualou c EW ektee,a relevuut to education; in thv

    .;,?,.c.;orld I hvIl (:.(Inuld.er how ekklIconcopta in genera sad, self

    .:-tocm, in 1,art5,.:u1ar iniluence leurning and teach ng; in the

    qtait -' rd I shill tn:amine acveral topics evaiging from studied

    o. vori.onalit/ c:evelopmont that appear to havt considarablecin7.2114

    12ApiLactime Future reaGurch and 'Ori40.

    I:TIPODWTP:;n

    Durrig. the pa.,t ten years I c ilonduetod a aeries

    o) rr;;* Btudiea deeligled to clarify the nnidecedents, correlates

    .24.1c1 oc,4,11ut.mcc of eft r:everal other invt,.tigt;tor

  • 2

    Lave been actively involved in studying self-eateem and the

    monoc;rnpho by Rosenberg (I), Diggory (2), as well au my own (3)

    t(,-ti477 to increasing awareness and knowledge of its signitl-

    canoe. Lot me briefly summarize the major findings bearing

    upon the fore ation of high aelt-esteem. As I define it aelf-

    et.teem represents one dimension of the self-concept, that of

    evaluation. The self is an abstract object about which the

    individual holds certain attitudes. JUdgementa of self-eatuem

    represent evaluative (positive-negative) attitudes about one's

    abilities, characteristics and porformence This focus

    upon one dimeneion of the self-concept is based on the siva-

    ricanue of apraisala for personal satisfaotion and effeotive

    performance ^a the advantages of studying single dimensions

    of the self-eonoept over those of examining several dimensions

    or the entire concept as a unity.

    The avudies reveal that there are three Eifirstjui oonditiona

    aaaociatod, with the development of high self-esteem. 'These

    are Eastal, expreaaed by warmth, intereat and conoern

    for the individualns vell-being by persona significant to

    him; 101:qY 12114214.1114112AMills

    and exnectatillerformence; and EstellatILAriatatal

    and intitude of individual for persona who abide by the

    eetablished llmits. tn a very general way this type of environ-

    ment may be omen ea one which provides clear cognitive guidunwe

    as to what Is expected and =Ikea considerable dellands for

    self-exertion and performance. To be specific the environment

    that produces high self esteem is neither permiseive nor

    democratic :l hough J4 we shall see these concepts tire too

  • idealized and ambiguous to afford much guidance is deitoribing

    act el Uterpersonal relations in *mall groups*Ot equal

    .

    interest and importance were the negative findings whish

    indicated that maAy conditions that presumablyeffected calf*,

    esteem had little if any influence on selfiwappreissl* Thus

    we find that the following were not ausociated with the

    formation of high aelesteem status, income, education,

    height, physics attreotivenesc, the amount of punishment

    and the amount of time af4nt with parents* The findings

    that these conditions were unrelated to whether persons

    evaluated thoueelvea favorably or unfavorably raise certain

    queations about the potency of external rewards as a means of

    a:footing feelings of competency and significance* When

    we find no difference in esteem between pereona (parents

    and children) with income levels of under two thousand dollars

    and. over on million dollars it is difficult 'to argue that

    money is a generally salient basis for judging wortblneas

    What do come through is the finding that success ia personally

    defined and Interpreted in accord with personal values

    expectations and defensee* That definition it based upon

    experiences in the e 'o ae3. f a a of aref`+ rer ce rather than

    vague sepiratione and fantasieb of what could be; they are

    filtered through defense* which determine how one definite and

    interprets the opinions of others and accepts them as entAxacing

    or devaluating* Thus external rewords and punishments, threats

    and incentives are effective in altering esteem to the extent

    thLt are coniastent with the persona values and expectations

    end are accepted, ht as indices of 61100046 and failure*

  • r:olf Ec,tecr Leorninq and Taochinir

    While it seeme obvious that aa individuel's concept

    of himself would have significant implications for his

    so ions, that ideas het had little offset upon educational,

    theory and practice. Many psychologists are quite intrigued

    by the ohild'e coneopta of spaces numbers time and morality

    beeause they believe suoh knowledge provides basic underLtlind

    ing about the child's mode of thinking and 'adapting to the

    environment. At the some time they are unoertain or skeptical

    that the child's concept of himself is eignifiesat to teaching

    and learning. Part of the diffirehoe between the attention

    to concepts regarding self and other objects appears to stem

    from the conviction that the educational prooess should focus

    upon materials, end the content of subject matter and not

    become involved in matters relating to personality, emotions

    or the students peraonal interests and es:acorns. When the

    term mental health is applied to the sohoolu it is done so

    vaguely ea to he virtually meaningless and affords no basis

    for establishing a (nine classroom practices' The question

    perwistss in what way is self-ooncept in seller 1 and melt

    esteem in particular relevent and hens 'i.cant or learning?

    In reeeonse to this question let me first cite the

    findiacja of several investigetores Self.oesteem has been

    aseociated with analytiorl thinking (4) which permits the

    individual to aeperate a problem into component parta with

    creative ability (315); with the ability to psrtioipato in

    discus4ions and express a point of view (1,3); with persistence

    in performing tasks (2) and with the ability to maintain a

  • constant perceptual framework in the face of confounding

    conditions (3). .Persons with nigh self-esteem are more

    likely to be loaders in their social 6roups, more concerned.

    about public affairs rather than personal problems,and

    less sensitive and anxious (1,3). They are generally more

    effective and in general achieve more at a given level of

    intellignece than do persons who take e more negative view

    of themselves* (3) In terms of affect, persons withhigh

    self-esteem are generally more express