dcmf

7
DCMF WSB Update EDCM Consultation Mo Sukumaran – WSB Chair 15 February 2011 1 | Energy Networks Association

Upload: karleigh-williams

Post on 30-Dec-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

DCMF. WSB Update EDCM Consultation Mo Sukumaran – WSB Chair. EDCM Consultation. EDCM Consultation workshop: Held 13 th January at ELEXON. 65 attendees. EDCM Consultation: Issued 21 st December 2010 Updated appendices issued: 23 rd Dec & 11 th January - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DCMF

DCMF

WSB Update

EDCM Consultation

Mo Sukumaran – WSB Chair

15 February 20111 | Energy Networks Association

Page 2: DCMF

EDCM Consultation

EDCM Consultation workshop: • Held 13th January at ELEXON.• 65 attendees.

EDCM Consultation:• Issued 21st December 2010• Updated appendices issued:

• 23rd Dec & • 11th January

• Consultation closed 1st February 2011.

2 | Energy Networks Association 15 February 2011

Page 3: DCMF

Consultation responses

3 | Energy Networks Association

Responses received from 28 stakeholders:• 3 DNOs• 2 IDNOs• 6 Suppliers• 6 Generators• 7 Customers• 4 Other organisations

Comprising:• 23 general response papers• 184 answers to the 15 questions in the consultation

15 February 2011

Page 4: DCMF

Key Comments

• Stakeholders recognise the progress and work by DNOs since June 2010

• Concerns:– Cost-reflectivity

– Inclusion of 2 different methodologies (LRIC, FCP)

– Demand scaling method and high percentage of total costs

– Justification of charges

– Fairly even split between voltage level and site specific options

– Need for capping seen as a failure of the methodology (although customers were in favour of capping!)

15 February 2011

Page 5: DCMF

Key Comments (continued)

• Concerns continued:– Scaling of generation charges

– Distinction between:

• intermittent/non-intermittent generation and

• on-shore/off-shore generation

– Volatility and predictability of charges

– Pre-2005 generation compensation unknown

• Awaiting Ofgem decision

– Failure to address issues raised to June consultation

– Specific illustrative charges – some are significantly higher

15 February 2011

Page 6: DCMF

A stakeholder comment

“In conclusion; this evolution is much better than that rightly delayed last summer.

It remains, however, an inelegant solution to a question that many EHV users would have been happy not to ask”!

15 February 2011

Page 7: DCMF

Next Steps

7 | Energy Networks Association

• Review the responses and reflect as appropriate in EDCM

• Publish a Summary of Consultation responses on ENA

website

15 February 2011