. -.... —.., ..mm mi mi Hill l 41H08NE2002 2.17947 CARLING

010 i 9^7

SOUTHERN ONTARIO MINING DIVISION

RECEIVED

OCT 3 1 1997AM W

DIAMOND DRILLING ON THEKILLBEAR POINT PROPERTY

THE PARRY SOUND DISTRICT OF ONTARIO

by

JAMES R. TRUSLER

LONG.: 80 0 13'44"W - 80 0 15'30"W LAT.: 45 021'33"N-45 023'31"N NTS: 41H/8 DATE: January 28,1997

DIAMOND DRILLING ON THEKILLBEAR POINT PROPERTY

THE PARRY SOUND DISTRICT OF ONTARIO

SUMMARYThe Parry Sound area of Ontario is underlain by complex gneisses and

migmatites of Middle to Late Proterozoic age which are part of the Ontario segment of the Central Gneiss Belt of the Grenville Structural Province. A working model of thrust plates (called domains and sub-domains) which are separated by ductile thrust faults and moved in a northwesterly direction upon each other has been postulated by Davidson et al (1982). Easton (1992) has improved this model in his synopsis using a hierarchy of terranes and domains wherein the terranes include domains of similar age which are autochthonous with respect to each other. Age dating has indicated that four of these large scale terranes or plates are stacked on each other with the base being near Sudbury at the Grenville Front and the top being near Kingston.

Despite the recent wealth of scholarly publications a comprehensive geological map has not yet been made available for the area. However, the limited information available has enabled the clear identification of potentially favourable conditions for both flagstone and dimension stone. Several flagstone occurrences cluster along Davidson's thrusts and several potential dimension stone prospects have been identified within the interior of particular domains.

Although one may ordinarily not expect to find dimension stone within tectonite terranes, it is evident that the autochthonous nature of some of the domains combined with annealing effect of later superimposed amphibolite facies metamorphism preserved large competent blocks of migmatites and gneisses.

As a result of mapping dimension stone potential, nine sites exposing migmatitic orthogneisses in the Britt domain were sampled producing encouraging results on sawing and polishing. Subsequently six of the properties examined and three properties identified in government research have been staked. One of these properties is the ten claim unit, 500 acre, Killbear Point property.

The property is underlain by massive to gneissic pink granite gneiss, migmatite and a purple and pink migmatite all of which are flat lying or gently dipping to the southeast. A study of the joint spacings indicates average spacings of 2 metres for horizontal joints and over 5 metres for vertical joints. Four prospective products , two of which are unique, attractive, red, textured granites have been identified in five potential quarry locations. A high yield rate of 30 tonne blocks is inferred.

During 1995, three sites were mapped at an approximate 1:500 scale using a pen notebook computer and Field Notes™ software. Site plans showing 1 metre contours, the existing ground conditions and joints were produced. The three sites designated Killbear

Page i

1, 2 and 3 respectively contain purple and pink migmatite, pegmatite breccia, and purple and pink breccia intermixed with pegmatite breccia. Each site is very prospective for dimension stone and 30 tonne blocks are apparently quarriable with low waste factors. Killbear 1 was sampled, and a preliminary set of ASTM tests conducted by Inchcape Testing Services NV Ltd. achieved satisfactory results.

Drilling of Killbear 1 and 2 was conducted in July, 1996 ( drill holes KB96-1 and KB96-2 respectively). The sloped area was stripped on Killbear 1 to a mild extent.

Drilling revealed a very attractive material on both sites reflecting the surface geology. The stripping did not reveal any new structures and no additional mapping was done. Unfortunately, the drill core was still significantly fractured despite attempts to obtain better coring. Fractures were experienced on average at 7.5 cm intervals in KB96-1 and at 10 cm intervals in hole KB96-2. In all but one case the fracture surface was fresh, unweathered material. It was concluded that excessive torque on the core from the drill tools was still the cause of fracturing in the core.

It is recommended that drilling be conducted with more suitable drilling equipment to properly test the horizontal jointing prior to quarry development. It is also recommended that test quarrying be conducted on Killbear 1 and Killbear 2 . Permitting through the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines and public information meetings will be required steps before quarrying. Further site planning, calculation of waste factors and costs for each quarry test and permit applications are to precede an effort to finance this next stage.

Page ii

41H08NE20022.17947 CARLING Q-| QQ

TABLE OF Cow i en i o

SUMMARY . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . Page i

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1

LOCATION AND ACCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1

PROPERTY . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . Page 3

DATES WORKED METHODS USED ON CURRENT PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . Page 4

RESULTS OF DRILLING AND STRIPPING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 4

CONCLUSIONS . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. Page 9

RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 9

AUTHOR'S CERTIFICATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 10

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . Page 2Figure 2: Property Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3Figure 3: Site Plan Killbear 1, Vertical Joints 1:518 . .. ... . .... .. .. .. . .. .. Page 5Figure 4: Site Plan Killbear 2, Vertical Joints 1:507 . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. Page 6

LIST OF TABLESTABLE 1: KILLBEAR POINT PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3DRILL HOLE LOG KB96-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7DRILL HOLE LOG KB96-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 8

Page iii

INTRODUCTION

In 1991, the writer commenced a project to evaluate the flagstone and dimension stone resources of the Parry Sound area. At the same time efforts by government geologists, principally Chris Marmont and Dave Villard, were being made to outline the substantial potential for these stone resources and make the public aware of the opportunity. In 1992, the regional investigation of flagstone resources by the writer proved discouraging. It was decided late in the field season to focus solely on the dimension stone potential.

By the end of 1992, many prospective dimension stone sites had been identified by either government publications or by the writer's prospecting. Nine of these dimension stone properties have now been staked by the writer, and an initial evaluation of each property involving geological mapping of the outcrops at a scale of 1:5,000 has been conducted. The work provides an initial evaluation of potential quarry sites on each property. The project has been supported by the Ontario Prospector's Assistance Program in 1992, 1993 and 1995.

In October 1991, the first portion of the Killbear Point property was acquired for its dimension stone potential. Additions to the property were made in 1992. Geological mapping was carried out initially in 1992 and a Preliminary map was prepared and submitted with the final report for the OPAP grant in 1992. This work was supplemented in 1993 with additional mapping on the property resulting in a more detailed interpretation of the northeast corner of the claim group and a revision of the Legend and a geological report on the property was completed (Trusler, 1993b). In 1995 a detailed geological evaluation of three sites using a field pen notebook computer to map the joints and ground conditions was conducted.

An OPAP grant OP96-077 was obtained in 1996 to drill test two sites for their dimension stone potential. This report is written to discuss those results and also to comply with assessment requirements.

LOCATION AND ACCESSThe property is located in Carling Township, Parry Sound District, Southern

Ontario Mining District, and Algonquin District Regional Geologist's area approximately 150 miles (240 km) north of Toronto (Figure 1). The property is bounded by longitudes 80 0 -15'- 30"W on the west and 80 0 -13'-44"W on the east and latitudes 45 0 -21 '-33"N on the south and 45 0 -23'-31" on the north. The corresponding UTM co-ordinates in metres are 558,100 on the west, 560,370 on the east, 5,022,840 on the south and 5,027,320 on the north. The property is within National Topographic System area 41H/8 and is recorded on claim map M2297.

The property can be accessed from Hwy 559, the Pengallie Bay Rd. and the Snug Harbour Rd by first leaving Hwy 69 some 10 km north of Parry Sound and travelling 19 km west on Hwy 559. Due to an old road and relatively flat outcrop the bulk of the property is currently accessible to 4-wheel drive vehicles.

Page l

'': M?^K'-i^'^ ' ^

''1:zM '' - : [*Cl!-. '̂ ^ASMl^AS

Figure 1: LOCATION MAP

Page 2

PROPERTYThe Killbear Point property comprises approximately 500 acres and is more

particularly described in TABLE 1 (Figure 2).Assessment was applied to the claims in 1993, and this report will be filed for assessment. As a result sufficient credits should be available to keep the entire claim group in good standing for some three years from date of filing.

TABLE 1: KILLBEAR POINT PROPERTY

Claim No

1151129

11511351151136

Township

Carling

CarlingCarling

LQl

66666464,65

Cone.

XIXX

IX

Area Recording Date

200 ac100 ac200 ac

Oct.23, 1991Nov. 5, 1992Nov. 5, 1992

KILLBEAR

SITEPLAN^'

KILLBEAR 3 SITE PLAN

KILLBEAR 1 SITE PLAN

Scale: 1:20,000

lFigure 2: Property Map

Page 3

RECEMAR l l 1998

Figure 2: Property Map DATES WORKED METHODS USED ON CURRENT PROJECT

Preparation work on the project commenced in April, 1996, the field work commenced on June 23, 1996 and the map drafting and report writing was completed on Jan.28, 1997. Actual work days for assessment purposes break down as follows:

Killbear Point Property: Claims SO1151129,1151135,1151136Preparation: Apr. 20, 1996 (^day) Field: Spotting: June 23, 1996 (!4 day) Drilling: July 7,8,9, 10, 18-26 incl (19 man days) Logging Core: Sept. 23,1996 (V2 day) Transcibing Jan 27,1997 ( Y* day) Reporting and Drafting: Jan. 27, 28, 1997 (1 Yt days) Stripping: July 8, 9 (1 man day) John Grace 8*. Aaron Flynn The stripping was carried out with the aide of a Wajax pump, shovels, grub hoe, and

an axe.The magnetic declination used in the field work is 10 0-5'W.

RESULTS OF DRILLING AND STRIPPING

Two vertical holes for 51 ft were drilled in July, 1996 to test to of the potential dimension stone sites. Drilling of KB96-1 and KB96-2 resulted in recovery of relatively uniform migmatite in the first case and a pegmatite breccia and granite migmatite in the second case as expected and logged in the two drill logs. The holes are shown on Fig 3 and Figure 4 the which are combined drill hole location maps drill plans and Site Plans. The area stripped (approximately 5m X 15 m) is shown on Fig 3. The drill logs follow the figures on pages7 and 8. The stripping did not expose any new structures and was not mapped. However, the rock exposed is the same as the surrounding pink and purple migmatite. This rock is descibed in detail in the log of drill hole KB96-1.

Material in both holes was very attractive consistent with samples taken from surface for testing and polishing.

The core from both holes was intensely fractured at intervals of 7.5 on average in KB96-1 and 10 cm in the case of KB96-2. Inspection revealed that these surfaces were in all but one case fresh indicating shearing by torque of the drilling tools. It was assumed that the breakage was due to a combination of poorly anchored setups and that limitations in the drill equipment did not allow for the casing to remain stationary against the core in the barrel. Rather the core barrel, the rods and the bit all rotated together. Corrections to this system were made on the subsequent drilling on the Black Lake property, but the problem was not entirely cured. Because of this difficulty a reliable indication of the horizontal joint separation is still not available for the the two sites tested.

Page 4

197m198ri

Concession l O Lot 66

Claim 1 151 129

196m

1 95m

LEGEND"Topographic contour

—— Lot line

^H Wooded area

Moss cover

Vertical joint

Horizontal joint

Gneissic foliation

Note: UTM

Coordinates for thesouthwest corner of the map sheet:

558666m E; 5024136m M

JR TRUSLER SITE PLAN KILLBEAR 1

Carling Twp, Ont. VERTICAL JOINTS

Concession 1O Lot 66

LEGEND

Coordinates for the

southwest corner of the map sheet:

JR TRUSLER SITE PLAN KILLBEAR 1arling Twp, Ont ERTICAL JOINTS

19O

1S7TTV 189m

t© tm

\Concession, 9\ Lot S4

Lot 65

LEGEND^ ^---' Topographic contour

------ Trail

Lot line

^^^ Wooded area

Moss cover

Swamp

Claim 1 15113S

fslote: UTM Coordinates for thesouthwest corner of the map sheet: 5i59715m E;

N: Scale: 1 :3O7.'O 1 2 3 4 S 1Q

Horizontal joint Vertical joint Gneissic fol

W i

X

JR TRUSLER SITE PLAN

KILLBEAR 2 Carling Twp, Ont.VERTICAL JOINTS

JRT

J R TRUSLER Page: l

Co-ords 1386 N 624.5 E DIAMOND DRILL RECORD Property: Killbear Point________________ Claim No.: 1151129

Township: CARLING Azimuth 0.0 *** Dip Tests *** Lot/Cone: 66 X

Date Started: July 7, 1996 Dip -90.0 Depth Az. Dip Date Completed:July 22, 1996

________________ Logged By: J R Trusler Elevation: 199 Date Logged: Sept.23, 1996

0.0 0.0 -90 Measure: MetricLength: 7.7 NTS: 41H/8 Contractor: D.R. Jamieson Geological Consultants Ltd. Core Size: AX Purpose: TO TEST DIMENSION STONE POTENTIAL Core Stored At: AURORA Note: GRID REFERENCED TO SW CORNER OF PROPERTY

SW CORNER OF PROPERTY AT UTM 558100E AND 5022840N

From To Description

(m) (m)

0.0 7.71 MIGMATITEMixed layered rock with variegated gneissic texture and at least three distinct genetic phases. Bright hematitic red speckled with lesser buff white and medium black alternating with salmon pink coarse pegmatitic bands; black bands are zoned as contact aureoles or reaction rims about the pink pegmatite bands. The neosome constituent represents approximately 40^o of the rock unit and the paleosome about 60^o. The paleosome layers are fine to medium to coarse grained red, hematitic quartzo-feldspathic rock with coarse grained probably earlier syntectonic felsic buff white portions. The unit comprises 25^o quartz, 65 07o feldspar, 507o hematite, 5^o biotite,, accessory leucoxene. Texture possibly an agmatite. The neosome material is coarse grained pegmatitic, containing 7007o pegmatite and 3007o coarse grained medium grey mafic gneiss with 3007o biotite and hornblende. The felsic portion contains 25*Xo quartz and 7007o pink and white feldspars usually euhedral to subhedral, 5 07o mafics including occasional magnetite. The rock is multiply folded at 45 0 to 90 0 to the core axis. The neosome layers are very attractive and are 2 to 40 cm thick but enhanced in some fold noses. Five fold noses were identified in this core section. The neosome constituent is partially a breccia.

7.71 End of holeFracturing in hole due to uncontrolled torque and reversed core ring was noted in centimetres from the top of the hole as follows: 47.5,56,61,72,89,95, 100, 103 , 108, 111, 115, 118, 121, 125,141, 162, 167, 169, 181, 193, 197, 202, 214, 220, 223, 231, 253, 261, 272, 289, 293, 298, 303, 306, 310, 314, 318, 329, 333, 337, 353, 357, 361, 364, 368, 371, 373, 376, 380, 384, 388, 397,402, 404, 408, 412, 416, 420, 425, 432, 437, 446, 455, 459, 463, 467, 471, 480,483, 490 , 494,500, 504, 508, 511,517, 520, 525, 528, 532, 535, 540, 544, 547, 570, 573, 582, 586, 589, 593, 597, 599, 603, 606, 633, 646, 676, 683, 688, 691, 695, 700, 703, 720, 724, 727, 745.

Page 7

J R TRUSLER Page: l ———————————————— HOLE NO.: KB96-2

Co-ords 830 N 1643 E DIAMOND DRILL RECORD Property: Killbear Point________________ Claim No.: 1151136

Township: CARLING Azimuth 0.0 *** Dip Tests *** Lot/Cone: 64IX

Date Started: July 22, 1996 Dip -90.0 Depth Az. Dip Date Completed:July 25, 1996

________________ Logged By: J R Trusler Elevation: 192 Date Logged: Sept.23, 1996

0.0 0.0 -90 Measure: MetricLength: 7.76 NTS: 41H/8 Contractor: D.R. Jamieson Geological Consultants Ltd. Core Size: AX Purpose: TO TEST DIMENSION STONE POTENTIAL Core Stored At: AURORA Note: GRID REFERENCED TO SW CORNER OF PROPERTY

SW CORNER OF PROPERTY AT UTM 558100E AND 5022840N

From To ———————————————— Description (m) (m)

0.0 3.55 GRANITE PEGMATITE BRECCIAVery coarse grained pink and white, salt and pepper and black streaked rock with plagioclase and microcline metacrysts or tectonic fragments in coarse grained salt and pepper matrix. Occasional flashes of blue peristerite in plagioclase, 5 *Yo biotite and 10 to 15 07o quartz. Grain boundaries are sharp and unfractured. Magnetite occurs with biotite but comprises *^l 0Xo of rock.

3.55 7.76 GRANITE MIGMATITEThe rock comprises two distinct components. The paleosome component consists of a coarse grained pinkish grey uniform strained gneiss which looks like a megacrystic granite. This alternates with a neosome constituent which is very coarse grained and pegmatitic of very similar colour and mineralogical composition. The paleosome component contains approximately 10 07o mafics including biotite, hornblende and minor magnetite. Hematite is present throughout at approximately I 07o. Magnetic attraction is weak to moderate.

3.55 to 3.76 transition zone between major units comprises pink and black strained bands.

Pegmatitic sections at 3.87 to 3.92; 4.00 to 4.03; 4.12 to 4.24 with black minerals and strongly magnetic;4.29 to 4.31; 4.47 to 4.79; 4.99 to 5.03; 5.07 to 5.21; 5.59 to 5.67; 5.78 to 5.82; 5.92 to 6.15; 6.28 to 6.52; 7.51 to 7.76.

7.76 End of holeFracturing in hole due to uncontrolled torque was noted in centimetres from the top of the hole as follows: 5, 8,12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 35 , 39, 49, 54, 71, 74, 82, 91, 102, 106, 120, 130, 141, 144, 152, 157, 160, 183, 198, 221, 226, 241, 245, 263, 287, 307, 340, 344, 348, 372, 400,405,448, 478,487,495 , 500, 516, 523, 533, 537, 541, 552, 555, 561, 593, 597, 600, 603, 607, 610, 614, 628, 633, 637, 641, 649, 665, 669, 683, 685, 704, 713, 726, 731, 751, 754, 760, 763, 767, 776.

Page 8

CONCLUSIONSThe Britt domain comprises a complexly deformed and metamorphosed series

of rocks. Although some of the rocks are metasedimentary in origin the preponderance of the rocks were originally plutonic, but have been changed by dynamic and thermal metamorphism. The final stages of this metamorphism appear to have annealed the rock into a compact and durable material having some relict textures and many overlapping and lively features.

The Killbear Point property comprises 500 acres, and is underlain by complex migmatites of Middle to Late Precambrian age. A study of the joints and joint spacings suggests that most of the property would yield a high percentage of 30 tonne blocks of dimension stone. Four potential product lines have been identified in five potential quarry sites. Two of the potential product lines are unique and the other two are similar to other stone already being marketed. All of the stone appears to be of good quality and very attractive.

Two vertical drill holes for 51 feet were put down to test two of the potential dimension stone sites in July .1996. The "purple and pink" migmatite tested on Killbear 1 and the pegmatite breccia tested on Killbear 2 were both consistent with the material on surface and very attractive. Un fortunately the core was intensely fractured due to excessive torque in the core barrel and possibly vibration. The sites will require redrilling with more suitable coring equipment in order to properly test horizontasl jointing prior to quarry tests.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Efforts are to be concentrated on further testing and development of the purple and pink migmatite and the pegmatite breccia:1. Killbear 1, on claim 1151129, is to be drill tested with HQ or NQ core. An

assessment of waste and cost factors involved with a quarry test and permitting through the testing stage are recommended. The quarry test will involve the removal of approximately 300 tonnes in 30 tonne blocks from the site.

2. Killbear 2, on claim 1151136, is to be drill tested. An assessment of waste and cost factors involved with a quarry test and permitting through the testing stage are recommended. The quarry test will likely require removal of some 300 tonnes of material in 30 tonne blocks from the site.

Initial licensing should proceed with the Minister of Northern Development and Mines to licence two sites for removal of up to a 3000 tonne test sample at each site; public information meetings will be required.

Page 9

199.0 m ASL Hole Collar @ 90'

Migmatite

EOL 7.70 m

Page 10

J R TRUSLER AND ASSOCIATES MINERAL CONSULTANTS

KILLBEAR POINT PROPERTY DRILL HOLE SECTION DRILL HOLE KB96-1

CARLING TWP. ONTARIO

Date : Jan 28. 1997 Scale: 1:100

192.0 m ASL Hole Collar @ 90 0

Granite Pegmatite Breccia

Granite Migmatite

EOL 7.76 m

Page 11

J R TRUSLER AND ASSOCIATES MINERAL CONSULTANTS

KILLBEAR POINT PROPERTY DRILL HOLE SECTION DRILL HOLE KB96-2

CARLING TWP. ONTARIO

Date : Jan 28. 1997 Scale:l:10Q

mwtm^' ' H&mf*'

AUTHOR'S CERTIFICATE

This report was prepared by:

James R. Trusler P.Eng.

Principal,J R Trusler and Associates 143 Temperance St. Aurora, Ontario L4G 2R5 (416) 727-5084

SOUTHERN O NTARIO MiNIHG DiVlSiO

RECEIVED

GEOLOGICAL ENGINEER.

oci 31 mim PH

i l2'-M

Qualifications:

B A Se - Geological Engineering, University of Toronto, 1967 MS- Geology, Michigan Technological University, 1972 Professional Engineer - Ontario Fellow - Geological Association of Canada Member - Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and

Petroleum

This report is based on a review of all available relevant data;historical, and geological, on personal involvement as Regional Geologist, Algonquin Region, Ministry of Natural Resources from 1974 to 1980, and on a program of field mapping conducted within the area of this report in 1993. l have personally examined the properties and the surrounding area in the field.

l have used my experience gained in geological mapping, the exploration for minerals, visits to most dimension stone quarries in North America, the definition of mineral deposits and the evaluation of properties (over 30 years) in preparation of this report.

l hold an undivided 1000Xo interest in the claims mentioned in this report, but do not expect to receive any remuneration for the report or as a result of statements made in this report.

Dated:January 28,1997

Signed

t -James R^Trufler M.S., P.Eng.

2.17947Ministry olNorthern Development and Mjnes

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining LandMining Act, Subjection, 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990

Imaging

Personal inlormalion collecl Mining Act. Ihe information i Questions about this colle 933 Ramsay Lake Road. Si 41H08NE2002 2.17947 CARLING 900

Instructions: - For work performed on Crown l- Please type or print in ink.

1. Recorded holder(s) (Attach a list if necess yy}n ~~ lc *,~c A CCCCC .————————————————————————————————— GfcUaUltlMlir nnQtT.vK

trral1 feerfcW fecorJfirJlg~allc1aii i, use f

Floor

rm o24oOCT 3 1 1997AM7.8i9.tt.ltil2il .5.

Client NumberName OFFICF

Address Telephone Number

Fax Number- 7/J -Name Client Number

Telephone NumberAddress

Fax Number'

2. Type of work performed: Check ( ^ ) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.

D Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)

ysical: drilling, stripping, trenching and associated assays [~] Rehabilitation

Work Type

. ... .. . :

Dales Work prnm 3/4 /D^T ; * 4 Performed - rrom e.1/ \ Gr , l -JJ

Day | Month \ YearGlobal Positioning System Data (if available)

i

. . .t . . ., : , .

\

. l , .... ..l.

f To . SJ~.\.G/'-.,^-^/'....Day j Month | Year

Township/Area fi..

M or Q-Plan Numbs/ ' j .

i . ( . j fV -

OlliceCommodity

Total S Value of .. Work Claimed 'j-

f NTS Reference

Mining Division C

Resident Geologist- District &JLA

Use

fioa.

dULxjiAjui,U

L^CCMJ .0

- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report. ' ,; ..,- ,,,. ,-

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report r (Attach a list If necessary)Name -~

KTelephone Number

Address

Ov- tfftyFax Number ,,.'

Name i.. ••.r. i;i,i IIP. ,i, Telephone Number

Address Fax Number

Name Telephone Number

Fax Number ~~Address

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agentli.'l t

, ___________,___,_________ , do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(Print Name) . ,. .

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed Ihe same during or after its completion and, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report Is true.

/I /J

5. Work to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are continuous XnOjoinlny) ' the mining land where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous link must accompany this form. ' ' : •••- -'i i -1 I^MM--

Mining Claim Number. Or if work was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column Ihe location number indicated on the claim map.

eg

eg

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

' 14

' 15

TB 7827

1234567

1234568

•so //r/itfto / /.r//?*50(1 5*7/34"

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

16 ha

12

2

4

f

E.

i Column Totals

Value of work performed on this claim or other ,. H mining land.. . , ". ( .j

326, 825

0 '

S 8, 892

^/0/ZI0I

t1.'.'•Ml

'•1

^2.02,

Value of work applied to this claim.

N/A

1 S24,000

S 4,000

'V '

31^r?too

jf''-

..t i- . -i i .

i'

fy000 '

Value of work assigned to other mining claims.

S24,000

0

0

Z lo f*~

•irJ~j

: " '

, f

3 z/®/

Pauk. Vnlim pi work In tin rlMrll'tltPflat a future date.

S2,025

0

S-1,892

EOZ

tr .' -i

# ̂ 0^l w — , do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under

. i ' . ., - l ...'l .' -: ., .(Print Full Name)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to' ' ' '

the claim where the work was donSignature of Recorded Holder or Afrant Atpfaf

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved. ^ f "''' l""

Soitie of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( ^ ) in the boxes below lo show how you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

- " - \J2C 1 . Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.

. ,,. 5s 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

D 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in-this declaration; or

CD 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

-* t,-,. ( cNote: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first,

followed by option number 2 If necessary. . . , - , ( i,

For Office Use Only ' - - -- - . ....i.. ,. ...... , . 5. .Received Stamp

0241 (OZ/96)

Deemed Approved Date n lo t?'1 ' 1 ' !' '

Dale Approved

Daie'fjoliiicaiion Sent"

Tolai Value of Ctedli Approved*

Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)

Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Transaction Number (otto* use)

Personal information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the information Is a public record. This Information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5. t . ,'

Work TypeUnits of Work "v.* ,

Depending on the type of work, list the number of hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres of grid line, number of samples, etc.

Cost Per Unit of work

Total Cost

F 17Gb-**llilrr A/- 1 M/.

' ffo

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

i

A. V. PU. -rvt

Food and Lodging Costs '"- 1 !l "

i i-L ^f lu. i

r'OV - c' t99 7 Total {Value of Assessment Work

Calculations of Filing Discounts:GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT

OFFICEv t -. /* ^ ' M

1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 10007o of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, 'It can only be claimed at 500Xo of the Total

Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:

TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 Total S value of worked claimed.

Note:--'- -- - ' • •--*~-^~--~r - - - - ----- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the ' Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.-"'-' 11 '' " h r"'"" ;il ''

Certification verifying costs:

o^-— — . i ,.,-,i f *-i (please print lull name) i

reasonably be determ

, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may

the accompanying De

to make this certificati

:laration as(recor

AM

OCT3-1 1997,^

0212 (02/96)

while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

am authorizedI r*.*** i -\^. r ' vi,-}* r f^f_________ l holder, agent, or.ttate company position with signing authority) .v .'•••'•'"•vijpiip if'

; t

^ /7 *._____/J s/ /j . ——-.———^—..—Slgnatura fs s// /7 Dale

^l^^^4J^'Ooi'^7 IBS7

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du DeVeloppernent du Nord et des Mines

March 13, 1998

JAMES RICHARD TRUSLER 143 TEMPERANCE ST. AURORA, Ontario L4G-2R5

OntarioGeoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (888)415-9846 Fax: (705) 670-5881

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s):

Submission Number: 2 .17947

StatusW9790.00132 Approval After Notice

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome by e-mail at jeromel2@epo.gov.on.ea or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYBlair KiteSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section

Correspondence ID: 12012

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2.17947

Date Correspondence Sent: March 13,

Transaction First Claim Number NumberW9790.00132 1151129

Section:16 Drilling PDRILL

1998

Township(s) 1 Area(s)CARLING

Assessor:Lucille Jerome

StatusApproval After Notice

Approval Date

March 12, 1998

The revisions outlined in the Notice dated February 3, 1998, have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the Declaration of Assessment Work Form accompanying this submission.

Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Tweed, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):JAMES RICHARD TRUSLER AURORA, Ontario

Page: 1Correspondence ID: 12012