dean’s advisory council on priorities

41
Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities College of Biological Sciences November 3, 2009

Upload: yazid

Post on 19-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities. College of Biological Sciences November 3, 2009. CBS Mission. To advance knowledge of the mechanisms of life via breakthrough discoveries and prepare today’s students to create the biology of tomorrow. Trends in Public Research Universities. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

College of Biological SciencesNovember 3, 2009

Page 2: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

CBS Mission

To advance knowledge of the mechanisms of life via breakthrough discoveries

and prepare today’s students to create the biology

of tomorrow.

Page 3: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Trends in Public Research Universities

University of California System

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEoYAuGF9Ug

Page 4: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Trends in Public Research Universities

Page 5: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Trends in the marketplace

Page 6: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Trends in the marketplace

Page 7: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Trends in the marketplace

Page 8: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Trends in the marketplace

College @ $99/month

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/college_guide/feature/college_for_99_a_month.php

Page 9: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Advancing the Excellence of the University of Minnesota

Report of the Future Financial Resources Task Force

Page 10: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

1. There has been a dramatic and permanent reset of the University’s revenues

• The share of the University’s budget provided by the State of Minnesota has dropped precipitously.

• Unrestricted state appropriations comprise only 18% of the University’s FY 2010 budget.

Page 11: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

2. Tuition now exceeds state support as the University’s largestrevenue stream.

Tuition has grown from 15% of the University’s budget in 1994 to 26% of the budget in FY 2010. In the future, tuition will continue to be the University’s largest source of revenue.

in $millions

Page 12: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities
Page 13: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

The University of Minnesota’s New Fiscal Reality

1. There has been a dramatic and permanent reset of the University’s sources of revenue: the share of the U’s budget provided by the State of Minnesota has dropped precipitously.

2. Tuition now exceeds state support as the University’s largest revenue stream and tuition will likely be the University’s largest source of revenue in the future.

3. Operating costs, the cost of academic excellence, and the University’s appetite for new academic investments are now rising faster than revenue.

4. Over the years ahead, the University of Minnesota will face even steeper competition for students, faculty, and research grants.

Page 14: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Strategies to Advance the Excellence of the University of Minnesota

in Light of the New Fiscal Reality

1. Grow a larger and more diversified portfolio of revenues.

2. Grow tuition revenue while ensuring financial access for qualified students from families with modest financial means.

3. Substantially increase administrative and academic effectiveness, reduce costs, and boost efficiency.

4. Narrow the scope of the University’s mission to advance a distinctive constellation of excellence.

5. Develop and execute long-term financial plans and budget and planning processes that advance the vision, inform decision making, track progress, and discipline the setting of priorities.

Page 15: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

College of Biological SciencesTrends in

Financial Sources and UsesNovember 3rd, 2009

Page 16: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

CBS Centrally Allocated Revenues

New Budget Model

Page 17: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

CBS Centrally Allocated Revenues (Adjusted)

Page 18: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

FY10 Budgeted Expenditures

Salary and Fringe make up 43% of budget

Page 19: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

How do we spend our reserves?

Page 20: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Student Credit Hours (How much we teach)

Page 21: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Our Majors

Page 22: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Cost of Students

• FY09– Undergrad $3,515– Grad $4,029

• FY10– Undergrad $3,280– Grad $4,048

Page 23: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Revenues and Costs per Undergrad

• Banded Resident Tuition + Fees = $9,120 + $1,200

• CBS share = $4,902

25% Tuition and Fees- College of Enrollment $2,580

75% Tuition and Fees (Average CBS Portion*) $2,322

•University Cost Pool - Undergraduate- $3,280

•CBS ‘Cost Pool’ - $1,123

•The difference is $4,902 – $4,403 = $499 per student available for instruction

*Typical CBS student takes 1/3 courses from CBS, 1/3 from IT, 1/3 from CLA

Page 24: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

What did we cut for FY10?$1.4M Recurring

• ICR Reserves• 2.75 Faculty FTE- A combination of 2 full lines

and .75 partial lines the college holds for faculty who have been on phased retirements

• RIO positions- 2 (one faculty, one staff)• Lay Offs/Nonrenewals (non-student) 1.5 FTE• Reduction of time (non-student) – 3.75 FTE• Compact ‘give backs’

Page 25: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

What do we (CBS) have to do for FY 2011?

Cut 2% = $800,000 recurring

Page 26: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

What should we do?• Increase Revenues (Strategy #2)

– Increase Indirect Cost recovery• In FY05-FY08, CBS averaged 32% recovery on all grants.• Grants that don’t receive this revenue are typically from

MMF, LCCMR, State of Minnesota, IREE

– Increase Tuition• Increase course offerings to attract students who would

otherwise take courses outside of CBS• Increase CBS required courses for majors

• Increase the size of our upper division student body

Page 27: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

What should we do?• Decrease Costs by Increasing

Administrative & Academic Effectiveness & Efficiency (Strategy #3)

– Further streamline administration and infrastructure?

– Eliminate programs?– Work the cost pools?– Combine

Page 28: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

What should we do?• Consider the scope of the CBS mission

(Strategy #4)

– Expand/Maintain/Eliminate • Goals• Programs• Infrastructure

– Partnerships• Among our units• With other entities

Page 29: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Where are we, with respect to our goals?

Page 30: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Progress toward goalsCompact Goals

• Increase quality of graduate programs• Increase impact of research• Develop best undergraduate program in the

country• Develop excellence in renewable energy

research• Establish an initiative in cellular dynamics and

imaging

Page 31: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Where are we, with respect to our goals?

Page 32: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Progress toward goalsInfusions to Advance the Biological Sciences

• Computational biology – Ecoinformatics– Modeling– Simulation/Optimization– Bioinformatics

• Evolution and biocomplexity– Molecular– Microbial– Cellular– Behavioral– Ecological

• Biology as an ‘engineerable’ science– Research– Training (undergraduate and graduate)

• Technology and infrastructure to address big questions in science

Page 33: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Where are we, with respect to our goals?

Page 34: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

CBS Departments & Programs

• Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics

• Ecology, Evolution and Behavior• Genetics, Cell Biology and Development• Plant Biology• Biology Program• BioTechnology Institute

Page 35: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Graduate Programs• Primarily Departmental

– Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics– Ecology, Evolution and Behavior– Molecular, Cellular and Structural Biology– Molecular, Cellular, Development Biology and Genetics– Plant Biological Sciences– Masters Program in Genetic Counseling

• Primarily Inter-Departmental– Conservation Biology– Master’s in Biological Sciences (with CCE)– Law, Health and Life Sciences– Microbial Engineering– Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology– Neuroscience– Water Resource Sciences

Page 36: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Undergraduate Majors

• Biochemistry• Biology• Ecology, Evolution and Behavior• Genetics, Cell Biology and Development• Plant Biology• Microbiology• Neuroscience

Page 37: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Infrastructure• Supporting Programs/Infrastructure• • Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve• Itasca Biology Station and Laboratories• Biodale (Imaging Center,BRC, Mass Spec, High

Throughout Bio)• Developmental Biology Center• Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute• Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Facility• Norwegian Centennial Chair Program• X-Ray Crystallography Lab

Page 38: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Deliverables and Ground Rules

Page 39: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

What should we do?

• It depends upon perspective.– Me– My department– My college– My university

Page 40: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

What should we do?

• Scenario A– Upside– Downside

• Scenario B– Upside– Downside

• Scenario C– Upside– Downside

Page 41: Dean’s Advisory Council on Priorities

Thank you!

• Working groups

– Revenue – Dave Bernlohr, Chair

– Administrative & Academic Effectiveness – Scott Lanyon, Chair

– Scope of CBS Mission – Kate VandenBosch, Chair