debate: do we need more hcv drugs con...

35
Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh Department of Medicine I University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany 18 th Antivirals PK Workshop, Friday 16 th June 2017, Chicago

Upload: vuongnhi

Post on 22-Feb-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs

Con Standpoint

Jürgen RockstrohDepartment of Medicine I

University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

18th Antivirals PK Workshop,

Friday 16th June 2017, Chicago

Page 2: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

• Honoraria for lectures and/or consultancies from Abbott,

AbbVie, Bionor, BMS, Cipla, Gilead, Janssen, Merck,

Roche, ViiV.

• Research grants from Dt. Leberstiftung, DZIF, NEAT ID.

Conflict of Interest: JKR

Page 3: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate

Seite 3

» This debate is not about who is more beautiful but

really do we need even more HCV DAAs than we

already have….

Page 4: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

3’UTR5’UTR Core E1 E2 NS2 NS4BNS3 NS5A NS5Bp7

Telaprevir

Boceprevir

Simeprevir

Paritaprevir

Asunaprevir

Grazoprevir

Glecaprevir

Voxilaprevir

Daclatasvir

Ledipasvir

Ombitasvir

Velpatasvir

Elbasvir

Pibrentasvir

GS-5816

Ruzasvir

Sofosbuvir

VX-135

Uprifosbuvir

ACH-3422

Dasabuvir

Beclabuvir

NS5BNUC Inhibitors

NS3Protease Inhibitors

NS5AReplication

Complex Inhibitors

Ribavirin

NS5BNon-NUC Inhibitors

PolymeraseProtease

-previr -buvir-asvir

HCV DAAs

Page 5: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh
Page 6: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

2016 EASL

Guidelines

Journal of Hepatology 2017;66:153–194

G/P Summer 2017 for all genotypes

Page 7: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Summary of EASL 2014S

VR

24 r

ate

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

100%

J-M Pawlotsky

Page 8: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

HCV therapy: Game

over!

Seite 8

A. Aghemo and M. Buti, Gastroenterology 2017

Page 9: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually

lower prices….

» Any special patient populations left?

» Need for shorter treatment durations?

» Need for better tolerated drugs?

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug

interactions?

» How about treatment of DAA failures?

Seite 9

Page 10: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually

lower prices….

» Any special patient populations left?

» Need for shorter treatment durations?

» Need for better tolerated drugs?

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug

interactions?

» How about treatment of DAA failures?

Seite 10

Page 11: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Box price of DAA in

current use in Egypt as of

April 2017

Seite 11EASL 2017

DAA Manufactuturer NCCVH Pharmacies

Sofosbuvir Generic 450 LE (25$)

Simeprevir Brand 1315 (73$)

Daclatasvir Brand 1315 (73$)

Daclatasvir Generic 60 LE (3$)

OMB/PAR Brand 3050 LE (170$)

SOF/LDV Brand 3050 LE (170$)

SOF/LDV Generic Not available

Price of ribavirin 1200mg/d for a month is 125 LE (7$) in NCCVH

Page 12: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually

lower prices….

» Any special patient populations left?

» Need for shorter treatment durations?

» Need for better tolerated drugs?

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug

interactions?

» How about treatment of DAA failures?

Seite 12

Page 13: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

High SVR in adult patients with

HIV/HCV co-infection treated

with DAAs

» 1. Wyles D, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:714–25;

2. Naggie S, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:705–13;

3. Rockstroh JK, et al. IAS 2016; Abstract # 10333;

4. Rockstroh JK, et al. Lancet HIV 2015;2:e319–27• Studies included non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients.

• TE: treatment-experienced

TN TE

ALLY-2:1

GT 1–4, TN & TESOF + DCV

SVR

12

(%

)

12 weeks

96

0

20

40

60

80

10097 98

0

20

40

60

80

100

51/5298/101

97

0

20

40

60

80

100

217/223

96

0

20

40

60

80

100

210/218

322/335

ION-4:2

GT 1 or 4, TE & TNLDV/SOF

TURQUOISE-1, part 2:3

GT 1 or 4, TN and TE

OMV/PTV/RTV

+ DSV ± RBV

12 weeks 12 or 24 weeks

C-EDGE:4

GT 1, 4 or 6, TNGRZ/EBV

12 Weeks

NOT HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISONS

Page 14: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

In vitro:1,2

• High barrier to resistance

• Potent against common NS3 polymorphisms (e.g., positions 80, 155, and 168) and NS5A polymorphisms (e.g., positions 28, 30, 31 and 93)

• Synergistic antiviral activity

Clinical PK & metabolism:

• Once-daily oral dosing with food

• Minimal metabolism and primary biliary excretion

• Negligible renal excretion (<1%)

1.Ng TI, et al. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2017 (in press). 2.Ng TI, et al. Abstract 636. CROI, 2014

EXPEDITION-I Study:

Next Generation Direct-Acting Antivirals

G/P is co-formulated and dosed once daily as three 100 mg/40 mg pills for a total dose of 300 mg/120 mg

Glecaprevir was identified by AbbVie and Enanta.

Glecaprevir

(formerly ABT-493)

pangenotypic NS3/4A

protease inhibitor

Pibrentasvir

(formerly ABT-530)

pangenotypic NS5A

inhibitorCoformulated: G/P

Page 15: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

EXPEDITION-1 Study: Objective and Study Design

Objective

» Evaluate the efficacy and safety of G/P for 12 weeks in patients

with HCV GT1, 2, 4, 5 or 6 infection and compensated cirrhosis

Open-label Treatment

G/P is coformulated and dosed once daily as three 100 mg/40 mg pills for a total dose of

300 mg/120 mg.

0 Week 24 Week 36Week 12

G/P 300 mg/120 mg

N=146

SVR12

assessment

Forns X, et al. 52nd EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 19-23, 2017. Abst. GS-006.

Patients were enrolled at

40 study sites in Belgium,

Canada, Germany, South

Africa, Spain, and the

United States

Page 16: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

EXPEDITION-1 Study:

SVR12 by Intent-to-Treat

(ITT) Analysis

Forns X, et al. 52nd EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 19-23, 2017. Abst. GS-006.

*Patient with HCV GT1a infection relapsed at PTW8 - No treatment-emergent substitutions were present in NS3

- In NS5A, Y93N was present at baseline; Y93N, Q30R and H58D were present at the time of failure

99 100 100 100 100 99

0

20

40

60

80

100

GT1 GT2 GT4 GT5 GT6 Total

% P

atie

nts

wit

h S

VR

12

89

90

31

31

16

162

27

7

145

146

Page 17: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

SURVEYOR-II, Part 3: SVR12: GT3

98% of patients had HCV RNA <LLOQ by treatment week 4

Page 18: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

SVR12 (mFAS)

21

23

22

22

17

17

17

17

17

17

Treatment-

naive

Treatment-

experienced

Relapse 2 0 0 0 0

91 100 100 100 100

mFAS excluded patients who discontinued treatment for reasons unrelated to study medication.

EBR/GZR

+ SOF + RBV

(8 weeks)

EBR/GZR

+ SOF

(12 weeks)

EBR/GZR

+ SOF

(12 weeks)

EBR/GZR

+ SOF + RBV

(12 weeks)

EBR/GZR

+ SOF

(16 weeks)

0

25

50

75

100

SV

R, %

Page 19: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Any special patient

populations left?

» HIV coinfected (SVR >95%)

» Renal insufficiency (SVR up to 99%)

» Cirrhotics (SVR up to 99%)

» GT3 treatment experineced with cirrhosis

(SVR 96%)

» Inherited blood disorders (SVR 94%)

» Transplant patients (SVR >95%)

» …you name it……

Seite 19

Page 20: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

So what does Nancy

really think and that

already in 2014…..

Seite 20

Page 21: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually

lower prices….

» Any special patient populations left?

» Need for shorter treatment durations?

» Need for better tolerated drugs?

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug

interactions?

» How about treatment of DAA failures?

Seite 21

Page 22: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

8-week LDV/SOF in non-cirrhotic,

treatment naïve GT 1

patients: real-world confirmation of

clinical data

» *Two patients received LDV/SOF + RBV.

LDV/SOF + RBV for 8 weeks

is not licensed in the EU.

ITT: intention-to-treat

• 1. Kowdley KV, et al. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1879–88; 2. Buggisch P, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #SAT-243;

3. Buggisch P, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #SAT-241; 4. Qureshi K, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #SAT-192;

5. Marshall V, et al. AASLD 2015; Poster #1154; 6. Latt NL, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #SAT-227;

7. Terrault N, et al. AASLD 2015; Oral #94; 8. Curry M, et al. AASLD 2015; Poster #1046;

9. Ioannou GN, et al. Gastroenterology 2016;151:457–71; 10. Creso J, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #LBP-511;

11. Ingiliz P, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2016;doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw567; 12. Lai JB, et al. EASL 2016; Poster #SAT-177

9499 98 98 98 98 97 95 95 94 93 92

0

20

40

60

80

100

ION-3 ifi DHC-R Burman'spharmacy

US Com.-Centers

Kaiser LA HCVTarget

TRIOCohort

VA HEPA-CRegistry

GECCO KaiserPermanente

631/644

202/215

1878/1975

127/131

186/199

127/128

238/258

32/34

47/48

331/338

Real world virological response (>4000 patients)

SV

R12 (

%)

*

236/240

242/254

Post hoc analysis; per protocol; ITT analysis

Page 23: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh
Page 24: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

8

*Endpoint was tested only after 12 weeks of G/P was determined non-inferior to 12 weeks of SOF + DCV

Foster G, et al. 52nd EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 19-23, 2017. Abst. GS-007.

ENDURANCE-3 Study:

Objective and Study Design

SVR12

Arm BN = 115

Arm AN = 233

Weeks

SVR12

0 12

G/P

20

Treatment Period

(1)

no

n-i

nfe

rio

rity

24

Post-treatment Period

Arm CN = 157 G/P

SOF + DCV SVR12

2:1

Ran

do

miz

ed

(2)

no

n-i

nfe

rio

rity

• Arm C: 8-week treatment duration

• Per discussion with regulatory authorities after phase 2 treatment data became available, an 8 week treatment Arm of G/P was added to the study design• SVR12: Non-inferiority of 8 weeks of G/P compared to 12 weeks of G/P*

Page 25: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Characteristic G/P

12 weeksN = 233

SOF + DCV 12 weeksN = 115

G/P 8 weeksN = 157

Male, n (%) 121 (52) 52 (45) 92 (59)

White race, n (%) 205 (88) 103 (90) 134 (85)

Age, median years (range) 48 (22 – 71) 49 (20 – 70) 47 (20 – 76)

BMI, median kg/m2 (range) 25 (17 – 49) 25 (18 – 42) 26 (18 – 44)

HCV RNA, median log10 IU/mL (range)

6.1 (3.5 – 7.5) 6.0 (3.8 – 7.4) 6.1 (1.2 – 7.6)

History of injection drug use, n (%) 149 (64) 73 (63) 104 (66)

Baseline fibrosis stage, n (%)

F0 – F1 201 (86) 97 (84) 122 (78)

F2 12 (5) 8 (7) 8 (5)

F3 20 (9) 10 (9) 27 (17)

Subtype GT3a, n/N (%)* 226/229 (99) 113/113 (100) 154/155 (99)

Foster G, et al. 52nd EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 19-23, 2017. Abst. GS-007.

ENDURANCE-3 Study:

Baseline Demographics

and Clinical Characteristics

BMI, body mass index; DCV, daclatasvir; G/P, coformulated glecaprevir/pibrentasvir; GT, genotype; HCV, hepatitis C virus; SOF, sofosbuvir*HCV subtype determined by phylogenetic analysis; N = total number of patients with sequence data available

2:1 randomized Non-randomized

Page 26: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Foster G, et al. 52nd EASL; Amsterdam, Netherlands; April 19-23, 2017. Abst. GS-007.

ENDURANCE-3 Study: Results

SVR12 by Intent-to-Treat (ITT)

Analysis

*Conventional statistical methods were used in multiplicity comparison for determining non-inferiority

Non-inferiority:

• Lower bound of the confidence interval (CI) of the difference in SVR12 must be above -6%*• (1) -1.2% (95% CI -5.6 –

3.1)• (2) -0.4% (97.5% CI -5.4 –

4.6)

• Both G/P treatments met non-inferiority criteria for the primary endpoint

95 97 95

0

20

40

60

80

100

SVR

12

(%

Pat

ien

ts)

TreatmentDuration

G/P12 weeks

SOF + DCV12 weeks

G/P8 weeks

222

233

111

115149

157

(2) non-inferior

(1) non-inferior

Page 27: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually

lower prices….

» Any special patient populations left?

» Need for shorter treatment durations?

» Need for better tolerated drugs?

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug

interactions?

» How about treatment of DAA failures?

Seite 27

Page 28: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

DAAs were well-tolerated

in clinical trials of

HIV/HCV co-infected

patientsAdverse events common across all

DAA regimens in HIV/HCV co-infection

trials

Wyles D, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:714–25;

Rockstroh JK, et al. IAS 2016; Abstract # 10333;

Naggie S, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:705–13;

Rockstroh JK, et al. Lancet HIV 2015;2:e319–27;

Brau N, et al. IAS 2016; Abstract #708

ALLY-2 ION-4TURQUOISE-I

Part 2C-EDGE

CO-INFECTION ASTRAL-5

DCV + SOFN=203

LDV/SOFN=335

OMV/PTV/RTV + DSV ± RBV

N=228GRZ/EBV

N=218SOF/VEL N=106

Fatigue 17% 21% 23% 13% 25%

Headache 11% 25% 14% 12% 13%

Diarrhoea 7% 11% 14% 7% 8%

Nausea 13% 10% 20% 9% 7%

D/C due to AE 0 0 0 0 2 (2%)

NOT HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISONS

This table illustrate adverse events obtained between different

regimens from different studies and are therefore not directly

comparable as study populations are NOT matched

Page 29: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually

lower prices….

» Any special patient populations left?

» Need for shorter treatment durations?

» Need for better tolerated drugs?

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug

interactions?

» How about treatment of DAA failures?

Seite 29

Page 30: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Drug-drug Interactions

between DAAs and ARVs

Don`t undermine your own existence as a clinical

pharmacologist….

Page 31: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually

lower prices….

» Any special patient populations left?

» Need for shorter treatment durations?

» Need for better tolerated drugs?

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug

interactions?

» How about treatment of DAA failures?

Seite 31

Page 32: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Re-treatment after failure

to LDV/SOF

9 patients without SVR in ION-4 after 12 weeks of LDV/SOF

» SVR in 8/9

» 1 relapse 4 weeks after EOT: GT1a, no cirrhosis

Cooper C, et al. 23rd CROI; Boston, MA; February 22-25, 2016. Abst. 573.

GT NS5A RAVs Before Primary Study (%)NS5A RAVs at Virologic Rlapse After Primary

Study (5)SRV12

1a None None Yes

1a None None Yes

1a L31M (>99), H58D (92) L31M (>99), H58D (92) Yes

1a Y93F (1), Y93N (10) Y93N (<99) Yes

1a L31M (>99), Y93N (<25) L31M (>99), Y93N (>99) Yes

1a* None Y93N (>99) Yes

1b Y93H (>99) L31I (11), Y93H (>99) Yes

1b None L31V (>99) Yes

1a None L31M (>99) No

LDV/SOF FailureN=9

LDV/SOF + RBVSVR12

Wk 0 Wk 12 Wk 24 Wk 36

Page 33: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

C-SWIFT: Retreatment for 12 Weeks with EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV in GT1-infected Patients Who Relapsed on Short-duration DAA Therapy

PURPOSE: Evaluate 12 weeks of EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV for HCV GT1-infected patients who failed prior treatment with EBR/GZR + SOF; shorter durations of 4, 6, or 8 weeks.

RESULTS:

• SVR12 = 100% for retreatment of 12 weeks, regardless of cirrhosis, subgenotype, or baseline RAVs

• No discontinuations due to AEs or laboratory abnormalities

• The only AE occurring in > 10% of patients was fatigue (12%)

33

KEY MESSAGES: Addition of RBV, and lengthened treatment duration to 12 weeks improves SVR rates in patients who failed prior short-duration DAA therapy. If patients fail short-term treatment, other options are available.

†Excludes two patients lost to follow-up at Day 3 and treatment Week 4.

SVR12: Overall and By SubgroupmFAS

% P

atie

nts

wit

h S

VR

12

(9

5%

CI)

Overall

100 100 100 100 100 100 100

0102030405060708090

100

No

Cirrhosis

Yes

Cirrhosis

4 weeks

Prior treatment duration

6 or 8 weeks

Prior treatment duration

No

Baseline NS5ARAVs

Yes

Baseline NS5ARAVs

18/18

5/5

8/8

15/15

5/5

18/18

23†/23

Lawitz E, et al. Presented at AASLD 2015; Poster #LB-12.

Page 34: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh

Debate: Do we need

more HCV drugs?

» More drugs, more competition and eventually lower

prices…. Price already down to 28$

» Any special patient populations left? no

» Need for shorter treatment durations? Already down

to 8 weeks

» Need for better tolerated drugs? DC in trials for

adverse events < 1%

» Need for drugs with less drug-drug interactions? All

solvable with the help of a clinical pharmacologist

» How about treatment of DAA failures? 3-drug

combinations from 3 drug classes already available

as salvage therapy

Seite 34

Page 35: Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpointregist2.virology-education.com/2017/18AntiviralPK/32_Rockstroh.pdf · Debate: Do We Need More HCV Drugs Con Standpoint Jürgen Rockstroh