debunking jon carroll

Upload: john-burt-caylor

Post on 06-Jul-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    1/55

    Re; CV16-00046JC

    To:

    The Unit.cd

    States Attorney and/or

    The Most Senior

    Assistant

    U.S.

    Attorney

    700 Stewart

    Street,

    Suite

    5220

    Seattle, Washington

    98101-1271

    Fax (206] 553-0882

    From: Wylde D.

    Williams,

    Jr.

    2003

    Glasgow Drive

    Dothan, Alabama 36301

    HAND DELIVERED

    MSGR

    :w

    REC D BY

    SB

    COPY RECEIVED

    JAN

    2 6 2 16

    Ti ME: Q~?

    UNITED

    STATES

    ATTORNEY

    Seattle, WA

    _FILED NTERED

    ODGED

    ECEIVED

    JAN

    27 2 16

    DJ

    . AT SEATTLE

    CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT

    ~STERN DISTRICT

    OF

    WASHINGTON

    DEPUTY

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    2/55

    January

    23rd,

    2016

    Federal Clerk's Office {Att: Johanna}

    Gus

    J.

    Solomon

    Federal Court House

    700 Stewart Street,

    Suite

    #2310

    Seattle, Washington

    98101

    _FILED _ENTERED

    _LODGED

    _RECEIVED

    JAN 27

    2 16

    J

    U.S.

    Attomey9s

    Office**

    AT SEATTLE

    CLERK U S DISTRICT COURT

    WESTERN

    DISTRICT OF W SHINGTONTY

    Y DEPU

    700 Stewart

    Street, Suite

    #5220

    Seattle, Washington

    98101-1271

    Fax # [206J 553-0882*

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    l

    lJO

    3rd Avenue

    Seattle, Washington

    98101-2904

    .

    Dear

    Federal Officers of the Court and Investigating Authorities:

    There currently exist pending before

    this

    Honorable District Court for the

    United

    States'

    9tJ

    Circuit, Seattle,

    Washington

    a civil action, case number identified as CVI6-

    00046JC. The heading; for which this case action

    is

    styled under

    has

    been

    recorded in the

    Federal Clerk's Office

    as

    a Complaint For Declaratory Judgment by individual

    Jon

    C.

    Carroll; identifying himself

    as

    a legal resident

    o

    said county and state

    in

    seeking

    this

    Honorable Court's favorable

    ruling

    for bringing forth

    before

    a jury for determination.

    At issue, for the purpose of his official letter

    is the

    Plaintiff's

    access

    to this court's

    jurisdiction, founded

    on

    fact based supporting facts and evidences. This official letter in

    itselfwill not represent the validity in total the weighty merits required being brought

    forth before

    this Honorable

    Court,

    at some later date realizing the Plaintiff's filing

    had been disingenuous-and

    misleading;

    on the

    surface,

    the court had no reason to know,

    could not have known,

    that the

    Plaintiff

    while

    listing his photojournalism

    experiences and

    accomplishments, giving the appearances o international connections, has obvious

    chosen to delete

    from

    making known before

    this

    Honorable Court that at same time

    he is

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    3/55

    actively engaged in his personally self owned-operating publishing blog located and

    licensed

    in

    supposedly

    Henry

    CoW1ty

    Alabama

    with a Abbeville, Alabama Post

    Office

    Box

    No.

    This personal information never

    appears anywhere

    within the content o plaintiff s

    complaint before this Honorable Court

    whereas first

    raising concems/doubts validity

    for

    this Honorable Court s jurisdiction; secondly because

    plaintiff

    left

    suspfoiously

    from

    this Alabama

    area latter 2015

    to whereabouts unknown;

    later

    was

    understood

    headed for

    Canada to

    supposedly avoid

    being served legal

    docwnents

    that

    resulted

    from Civil

    actions

    filed. Standing

    is qualified

    as

    result

    o

    plaintiff s decision to deliberately

    name

    within the filing o this civil

    action

    author o his letter by name

    but

    far more troubling

    the fact that this filing

    has

    intentionally Jed

    this

    Honorable Court

    to

    believe that all within

    documents nanatives~ descriptions, listings, examples and displays have been lawfully

    and

    legally

    obtained which in fact is not correct, and furthennore not

    true;

    giving any

    average

    minded

    person

    the

    impression for

    purposeful

    deceiving and deceptions o his

    Honorable Court. While

    the author

    o his

    letter writes

    on]y in his

    sole behalf

    and his

    alone;

    although via a telephone conversation recently another

    individua1

    listed in this

    plaintiff s

    case filing before this Honorable Court can

    be identified as

    one

    Ms.

    Jacque

    Bargoon advising o her too having

    had

    docwnents removed

    by

    p]aintiff; others, this

    author

    having

    no

    knowledge of.

    As

    the authoro this letter Ihave only within p st few days learned ofthis

    plaintiffs

    filing o his

    civil action s

    information from

    a

    local Alabama

    source;

    why,

    you

    may

    ask is any o his

    filing a concern

    o

    mine? I h d never

    known

    of never heard

    o

    the plaintiff before

    late swnmer

    2015;

    and

    then

    only

    through

    a

    friend who

    had

    heard

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    4/55

    about him through his daily/weekly local/area bloggings nd

    thought

    I may want to call

    on him for

    a

    meeting to discuss

    the possibilities o helping me

    with

    a book I h d written.

    He was

    told

    over the phone

    before

    our fitst one on one meeting that I

    h d

    been fallen by a

    disabling

    sttoke, and

    that all my materials

    for

    my book h d been dropped

    over

    time

    and

    that I needed help organizing nd editing. He advised me that he was sure that he could

    help,

    and

    where

    he couldn t he

    knew

    enough

    people

    that

    could.

    Talking back

    and

    forth

    over

    telephone a few

    times,

    I was lead to believe I could

    trust

    him especially

    since never

    having

    met him

    before,

    and

    continuously reminding

    him

    o

    m

    y

    having

    h d

    a stroke

    and

    confined

    to

    home,

    and

    y wife s worry for my continued involvements. From

    those

    first

    few telephone conversations

    laid ground

    work

    for

    first afternoon

    meeting at my

    residence.

    This

    ftrst

    meeting,

    with

    a friend who he

    had

    brought

    with

    him,

    we

    talked on

    my front

    porch for about 5 minutes, give or take. Originally wanting to audio nd video me, I told

    the

    plaintiff

    from the st rt

    that

    making

    of

    ny audio

    or video was not

    going

    to

    be

    allowed

    or authorized. Plus to reinsure my position

    because

    ofmy stroke,

    health

    problems with

    short~term memory lost

    at

    72 years

    old,

    h rd

    of

    hearing,

    that

    he

    was not authorized

    to

    audio Ol video; anything done without my expressed

    and

    written in advance authority

    given him

    would be a violation of my trust,

    to

    which in every visit, then, and theteafter he

    agreed

    to

    honol to the fullest; I

    believe

    all total visits

    to

    my

    residence

    there

    were four.

    His actions at. subsequently resulting

    from

    plaintiff having been at my

    residence

    late swnmer 2015 is

    now

    the bedrock

    qualifying

    sound

    statements

    evidences

    addressed

    within

    this official

    lettel . First and

    foremost

    I

    write

    not for

    me

    first as an individual, but

    to the

    greater contrary; the protection

    o

    other s.

    friends

    or

    not

    o

    mine.

    rights

    to

    lesal

    and

    lawful opportunities

    to benefit

    from my

    years

    of efforts

    to make

    their stories known

    since

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    5/55

    before

    2002,

    and not

    to be profited

    off

    o

    after their

    having

    suffered, endured years

    o

    tragedies,

    and

    traumatizing emotional depressions resulting

    from

    their families suffering

    from

    murders, beatings, imprisonments,

    and

    the

    list

    goes on.

    But, the

    anchor

    o al] the

    accumulations o years

    o

    infonnation, interviews.

    evidences gathered

    by

    not

    onJy

    myself,

    but

    my friend and

    attorney

    the Late nd

    Honorable Brian W. Dowling beginning Swnmer, June 1997, paralleling FBI

    tri-states

    gambling raids; eventually involving both ofus in litigations tied to illegal drugs,

    government corruptions, involving

    upwards to

    7,000,000.00 criminally embezzled

    from

    local

    business; additionally important would come

    to

    cause to the resurfacing o unsolved

    assassination

    o [black] Dothan

    Police Narcotics Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson,

    from

    January

    31

     

    1978, by 2002 before fallen by

    stroke,

    but

    after

    Brian

    being

    found

    mUl dered

    along side roadway ditch,

    and both

    our

    mend and

    attorney, parHime municipal

    judge

    the

    later

    and

    Honorable

    Jennifer Atwell having

    been found

    dead

    in

    bed in

    less than

    65 holll S

    after

    having

    ordered the issuance

    for me o 30 subpoenas

    that would

    have

    a

    direct bearing on the exposing continued cover

    up

    involving Mr. Dowling•s murder

    too.

    Within same

    month I

    h d my

    stroke August

    2002.

    The litigation between the plaintiffand defendants

    are

    for their resolving and not o

    this author's concern;

    but it

    is

    o

    most panunount and urgent

    that

    this Honorable Court

    does move

    forthwith denying plaintiff, for

    now and

    evermore any/all his

    agents/associates/partners present or

    future use

    in the narrative, audio, or video

    communications'

    forms

    any referred to, described, listed, or displayed examples obtained

    from the residence, for

    any

    plaintiff's purpose[s], o his official letter's author.

    While true,

    and

    I realize, this letter

    may

    not be

    the

    proper legal document vehicle

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    6/55

    for any

    individual

    to become a party

    to

    this civil case action, it is

    the

    well planned

    intention

    o

    same

    to

    participate

    as

    a

    friend

    o

    the

    court via Americus curiae in

    an

    effort

    contributing to the protecting o his Court's Honor, Esteem, Integrity, and Public Trust;

    defined within the U.S. Code Title 18, o Part I, o Chapter 101,

    for

    Section 2071:

    CONCEALMENT, Removal, Mutilation generally , ref62

    Stat.

    795 June 25

     

    1948

    2071

    a); Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals,removes, mutilates, obliterates,

    or destroys, or attempts to o so, or with intent to do so .........filed with

    any

    clerk andlot

    officer

    o

    court

    o

    he

    United States ........

    Therefore qualifying, in

    fact the compelling o

    both

    the

    Seattle's 9

     

    U.S.

    Circuit's

    U.S. Attorney's Office and Federal Bureau oflnvestigationjurisdictlons to intervene into

    plaintiffs

    motivation

    for

    singling

    out this particular court, in lieu o court within

    plaintiff's longtime established residence jurisdiction;

    and

    too, plaintiff's continuous day

    to day operations o business commonly known to public as The Henry County

    Reporter , the U.S. 11 ll

    Circuit

    Atlanta, Georgia;

    via

    U.S. District Cgurt

    for

    the Middle

    District o Alabama loeated

    in

    Mont_gomer_y.

    Alabama

    only less

    than

    l00 miles away

    from identified and/or implied named sources referred to in plaintiff's filing.

    he plaintiffhas sought out

    the

    U.S. Court located

    the

    greatest distance

    from

    making convenient

    and

    accessible the very parties plaintiff

    so

    freely names and from

    whom claimed any and all infonnation and document copies provided plaintifffor

    publishing his articles

    were so readily. freely,

    and never without restriction provided him

    thus

    allowing plaintiff to have appeared before this Honorable Court without haYing ever

    known of accwnulations o misrepresentations brought before thi:, Honorable Court via

    this plaintiff's

    civil

    action's

    filing, and the

    W1derlying

    ulterior

    motives

    believed for

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    7/55

     

    ··

    having done so

    regarding those

    others also,

    liken

    to same

    as

    author

    of

    his official

    letter.

    In conclusion, the plaintiff not only makes known

    to

    this Honorable

    Court

    his

    established

    residence, furthermore

    his

    continuing

    day to day ongoing blogging business;

    but

    fails to make

    known

    to

    this

    Honorable Court

    that during plaintiff's second visit to

    author

    of

    his official letter's residence that plaintiffdid

    in

    fact, without this author's first

    knowledge

    of,

    advance

    approval of, or

    even in

    the aftermath a subsequent awareness of

    plaintiff having

    made

    secretly a clandestine video photo of author's person at his

    residence.

    This

    author

    only

    learning of

    how

    been secretly violated of

    his

    trust

    placed

    in

    plaintiff

    via

    neighbors co-workers

    seeing

    photo of

    author

    of internet and telling family

    members. Plaintiffwhen

    confronted,

    agreeing to stop, not to blog audio/video of

    his

    author,

    his private properties ever again

    wou1d soon be

    found out to be again

    untrustworthy.

    While all

    during these

    same

    times this plaintiffwas continuously seeking

    from, to get any and all physical

    properties

    he

    could

    access.

    But

    after

    first

    incident with

    photo,

    having

    been the third meeting,

    y

    the forth

    was

    obvious

    to

    plaintiff

    that

    no

    longer

    cou1d be anticipated any further opportunities gain

    access

    to file copies for audio/video.

    The last communication that this author

    had from

    plaintiff after refusing to discuss,

    to

    agree to

    give RT an interview, after learning

    RT

    was Russia

    Today ;

    and refusing to

    again and again provide further documents, sent message~

    M ome

    back

    down

    (supposedly from

    Canada) there and be t

    his elderly

    ass. Please, assist in forwarding

    copies to clerk's office

    and

    bW Cau's office since

    they

    are without fax. Thanking you in

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    8/55

     n

    the United States District Court for the U.S.

    Circuit

    Western District o

    Jon

    B.

    Carroll, Plaintiff

    Vs.

    John

    White

    Carlton

    ..Bubba

    Ott

    Mike Magiino

    Andy

    Hughes

    Tony

    Spivey

    Eddie Henderson

    Rex Tipton

    Keith Cauthen

    Steve

    Parrish,

    Defendants

    Washington at Seattle

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    }

    CIVIL

    ACTION

    CASE

    NO.

    #CVJ6-00046JC

    Complaint for Declaratory Judgment

    ury Trial

    Demanded

    Civil

    Action Case

    #CV16-00046JC

    Judgment filed

    in

    th

    Circuit for

    the United

    States

    INTRODUCTION

    COMES

    now the

    petitioner by and

    through

    self representation before

    this

    Honorable

    Court,

    not in

    seeking

    material and/or monetary

    damages

    via

    this court's

    findings;

    but whose

    one and

    only

    purpose

    is not self

    centered

    and/or

    driven

    but

    rather to

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    9/55

    the

    contrary

    as

    previous years

    history

    will support; privately

    and publicly for those,

    friends of

    mine,

    or either those having never been

    known

    to

    me

    before;

    for

    reasons, the

    advocating

    o

    their equal rights, protections,

    and

    due processes, originally beaiMing

    1997. By

    1999

    having joined

    small local

    activist

    group,

    C.L.A.R.A. [Citizens

    for Legal

    Accountability and

    Refol lll

    in

    Alabama],

    who

    likewise

    had same

    concerns

    as

    petitioner,

    becoming

    even

    more

    engaged within

    an even

    smaller core of group

    which

    included about

    10/12

    individuals: A retired

    school

    teacher, a

    medical

    doctor,

    two

    attorneys, paralegal,

    two

    small businessmen, a

    farmer,

    a retired serviceman, a county secretary, a college

    student, and a waitress.

    THE

    petitioner

    now moves

    this

    Honorable

    Court to

    deny

    any/all request

    for

    this

    court's ruling

    in

    part or

    whole

    involving this plaintifrs Complaint

    for

    Declaratory

    Judgment. Petitioner

     

    s merits

    in these

    matters before this court are sound and qualified.

    Namely, plaintiff

    does not

    list

    in his

    complaint that

    he

    is owner-operator of his business

    The

    Henry

    County

    Report'\ also affixed

    atop

    o

    posted

    articles plaintiff's personal photo,

    located

    in

    Abbeville, Alabama with a

    post

    office box address. Plaintiff

    has

    come before

    this

    court in

    such a disingenuous narrative presentation,

    now has

    caused or caused

    to be

    caused of this Honorable Court

    to be under

    duty and obligation to demand o plaintiff to

    be forthcoming

    with all, total,

    and complete facts, and

    truths plaintiff references

    to as

    either indirectly or directly applies to this petitioner during few weeks latter 2015,

    which

    at no time was

    told verbally, or

    given

    in

    writing

    to post

    anything plaintiff

    had

    access

    to

    under petitioner's true beliefs and understandings were for the purposes in aiding

    in

    organizing

    and

    book editing of

    past

    years experiences, before having

    been

    faUen

    by

    disabling

    stroke and

    left handicapped, restricted

    to residence. he

    petitioner knows

    that

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    10/55

    plaintiff has without authority or authorization

    made

    taken, and/or removed physical

    items

    and/or audio/videos

    made

    in secret without petitioner's knowledge

    at

    time. These

    matters before this Honorable Court are

    more far reaching

    and

    shouJd

    strive to avoid

    being made a fool''. The plaintiff has sought personal exposures, nd

    now thru

    this filing

    plans

    for

    pursuing personal material and monetary

    gains on

    the backs of others, without

    their knowledge hideous pains. Claiming before multiple natiooal media sources that

    plaintiff

    had

    hundreds of documents commands

    of

    this court to challenge plaintiffas

    to

    validity

    and

    factuality

    of

    said statement[s] by publicly presenting before this Honorable

    Court,

    and

    from whom individually named persons, did plaintiff acquire and how so

    much

    of

    others personal affaits.

    The plaintiff dishonors those

    he

    so causally refers to, namely my

    friend and.former third shiftfellow police office assassinated Dothan Police Narcotics

    Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson my longtime friend and attorney

    the late

    and

    Honorable Attorney Brian W Dowling additionally others such as Sergeant Jackson's

    lead investigator, Homicide

    Detective Sergeant Harold Locke found suspiciously

    killed

    result of traffic accident, seventeen year old teenage senior high school girl,

    Ms.

    Tracie

    Hawlett friend of Ms. JB. Beasley both found murdered execution style Ozark,

    Alabama

    Ms.

    Tracie Howlett having been

    the

    first born daughter,

    ofmy

    police academy

    roommate Dothan Police Patrol Corporal Robert

    Hawlett

    found

    suspiciously drown and

    but not limited to the

    late

    and

    Honorable Jennifer

    Atwell found suspiciously dead in less

    than seventy-two hours after having ordered the issuance of hirty subpoenas tied to the

    suspicious hit and rim homi(;ide

    of

    attorney Brian Dowling and or

    shptgun

    assaJ Yl>tarion o Oothan Police ffi R .

    zcer ober/ Jack.son. ttr

    o• • :~- '

    ,. -•

    ._ U M . , ..,,...Ji.J.r ij>

    1i-..'J.I l u u n } S

    I Ct:effeCI.

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    11/55

    I.

    to by name or either identities implied arc deserving, commanding,

    of

    his court's

    compassion and protection from

    profiteering.

    lfthe plaintiff desires to make a public

    documentary involving those unknown to him, until coming to petitioner's residence, the

    petitioner

    moves

    the Honorable Court

    to

    order plaintiff to return to his home city/county

    of licensed business

    and do

    so

    ethically

    and

    honorably. This

    petition t h

    no vested

    interest i l

    the participation

    or ougome

    in this case

    action's

    decision

    between

    plaintiff

    and/or defendants, for whatever

    their litigations;

    it.

    s each of

    theirs, the law

    enforcement

    authorities and this

    Honorable

    to resolve.

    PURSUANT to United States Court Federal

    Rules

    of Civil Procedures, specifically

    Rule 24, Intervention, for purposes of petitioning this honorable court the qualified

    filing of Americus curiae, ''friend

    of

    he court, someone

    who is

    not a

    p rty

    to a case and

    offers infonnation that be rs on a case, but who has not

    been

    solicited by any of

    he

    parties to assist

    the court,

    a way to introduce concerns ensuring that the possibility broad

    legal

    efforts

    of

    a court decision

    will

    not depend solely on

    the

    parties directly

    involved ;

    whose

    sole reasons designed

    to

    make known before

    this

    honorable court, true

    fact based

    information/events otherwise will never be

    made

    known of before this court involving

    the

    above styled

    recorded case number CVJ6-00046JC.

    Puckett vs. Cox: [1972]

    456f 2d 233;

    It

    was

    held

    that

    a prose complaint

    requires

    a

    less stringent reading

    than one

    drafted by a lawyer,

    per

    Ju.srice Black in Conley

    vs.

    Gibson.

    WHEREBY>

    comes

    now

    the petitioner, Wykle D. Williams, Jr., at age of seventy-

    two

    years, a stroke disabled

    legal

    resident of

    Dothan,

    Alabama by

    nd

    through self

    representation, prose, and with utmost respect beseech of his Honorable Court to move

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    12/55

    forthwith

    in

    the

    ordering

    o

    plaintiff

    o be

    publicly

    forthcoming thru oral/written

    admissions provided for

    within

    Federal Rules o

    Civil Procedures,

    outlined in Rule

    36,

    Request

    for Admission''; before

    this

    cowt

    him

    having had at sometime

    since 2015 with

    aforethought[s] premeditated

    and subsequent

    intentional planning[s] motivated within

    his

    person

    to achieve plaintiff's own self

    serving

    personal material

    and monetary

    gains

    as

    a

    dil ect and

    specific result thereof having

    aequired from

    petitioner

    petitioner's

    personally

    owned/stored

    documents/papers/photos/materials/etc.

    JENKINS vs. McKEffHEN: [1959) 395

    U.S. 411,

    421: Prose pleadings are to be

    considered

    without regard to

    technically, pro

    se

    litigants' pleadings are

    not to

    be held to

    same high

    standards

    o

    erfection as

    lawyers.·•

    STANDING:

    Petitioner's standing in

    these

    matters

    before the

    court are qualified

    and sound. Petitioner's

    issues before this court

    do not

    totally rest

    with

    either

    the

    plaintiff

    or defendants,

    for

    their litigations

    are

    for their

    own

    settling. Petitioner's on

    the

    contrary

    is

    different because of plaintiff's narrative[s]

    and

    references

    made

    directly

    and

    specifically

    involving

    petitioner which on the legal merits

    have not beeri

    presented before this court in

    a

    manner

    consistent with

    honor, integrity, ethics,

    and

    compassion when using for

    journalism props others

    trust.

    This honorable

    COW t is

    duty bound,

    has an obHgation to

    order, demand

    of

    plaintiff that he

    publicly admit wrongful/iUegal

    t.aking of

    petitioner s

    personal properties; especially

    any and

    all in

    any

    unofficial/official capacities

    tied to

    the

    shotgw:i assassination of

    police

    officer Robert Jackson,

    or

    any others whose

    names/info

    plaintiffdid acquire unknowingly from petitioner. Over this short period o

    ime

    2015

    plainti ff did knowingly and personally engage

    in

    multiple violations

    wel

    defined within

    the State o Alabama Criminal Codes 13A- sections, namely

    Larceny , [larceny after

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    13/55

    three

    times

    being

    denied access

    to

    his

    equal rights

    filing

    either and/or city/federal

    incident/offense

    reports. Letter

    dated June 1999,

    petitioner

    to

    AUSA Holmes

    before

    October

    l 999

    gambling trillls, still continuing to seek justice for son, to this date, denied

    Likewise information and

    evidences provided

    too via attorney Brian Dowling

    until

    his

    murder April

    13

    1

      . 2000. Petitioner

    moves

    this Honorable Court, guided

    by

    its conscious

    o

    the law, not to

    fail

    those seen as weak, o easy prey. and who cannot speak aloud

    for

    themselves any longer, being made mockeries o by same who

    claim

    powers and

    authorities promoting justice for all.·

    WHETHER in part/whole; no one item or more th n one item[s at anytime was

    ever released

    to

    plaintiff

    in

    any fonns/styles for

    plaintiff's

    journalism operational care,

    custody,

    or

    controls, or any other

    authorities

    to function

    in any

    official capacity; plaintiff

    was told time and time

    g in

    and again he

    w s

    not given pennission, never authoriud to

    make audio or

    video o

    petitioner's person; yet in direct violation ofpedtioner's trust,

    plaintiffdid

    in

    fact brazenly violate secretly petitioner's trUst nd confidence by posting

    on his

    blog pages

    and photos believed by

    petitioner to

    have been secretly videoed;

    and

    furthermore plaintiffwas

    without exception,

    resetVation

    told, more

    than one time that

    he

    was

    not authorized, whether

    in audio/video t pe fonns never to

    act

    in secrecy involving

    petitioner/personal properties. Petitioner moves this court to

    order

    involving pl intiff

    he

    public enforcing o Federal

    Rules o_fCivil

    Procedures,

    Rule

    #37, Failure to Make

    Disclosure.s. or to

    Cooptr(Jte

    in Discovery

    Sanctions''.

    WHILE

    at

    all

    times during plaintiff's movements

    did

    cause

    petitioner

    to become

    trusting and taking plaintiff

    into

    petitioner's confidence. Plaintiff after having already

    established origjnaJ contact

    with petitioner somewhere

    arowid about summer

    2015

    was

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    14/55

    by that time fully

    aware in detail about

    petitioner s

    having endured

    a disabling

    stroke,

    acrually even

    prior

    to plaintiff s/petitioner s

    first

    meeting, which

    had been

    established for

    one primary and particular purpose;

    for

    their discussion regarding plaintiff s assistance in

    helping obtain

    someone

    traveling out-of-state

    with

    journalism editing backgrowid

    qualifications, from Australia for petitioner to help edit p st twelve years of his attempts

    to write a book,

    only to

    be denied due being handicapped and complicated becauseof

    stroke s severities. Additionally plaintiff encouraged petitionerto continuously provide

    fact-based documents that plaintiff s contacts with HBO

    was

    interested in doing amini

    series docwnentary

    about

    isolated incidents/eventspetitioner

    having

    h d for decades,

    recent yea.rs, a close/vested interest in; specifically the assassination offriend and fellow

    law enforcement

    Dothan

    police officer

    Robert

    Jackson; none

    of which

    plaintiff

    had

    ever

    been cognizantof previously nor could have ever been undennines plaintiff s narrative

    in filing,

    Complaint

    for

    Declaratory

    Judgment, Federal Rules o

    Civil Procedures, Rule

    26,

    A

    duty to

    disclose

    general

    provisions,

    government discovery ; when involving

    any

    and all words, verbiages, punctuations, grammars, descriptions, mentioning, addressing,

    referencing, and/or

    in

    any other styles or

    fashions not herein

    spelled out tied directly

    to,

    and/or indirectly to

    the name

    of

    the

    deceased State of

    Alabama

    [black aw Enforcement

    Dothan

    Police Narcotics Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson; or

    his

    widow

    BiJlie

    Jackson,

    or son Robert Jackson, Jr., or daughter Yolanda Jackson; or in fact any other individual

    who

    by name

    was

    MOngfully

    ~uire

    by

    plaintiff unauthorized

    by

    petitioner. Likewise

    as equally applicable

    any

    and

    all

    types, styles, and forms

    of

    petitioner s persona

    physical

    properties; but not to

    be

    overshadowed, occurring

    at

    any and all times, providing

    originals of existing audio/video tapesmade of petitioner with accompanying audio/video

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    15/55

    copies

    attached avoiding future

    violations

    of petitioner s trust

    and confidence.

    AS result o direct

    actions

    taken by

    plaintiff

    during

    plaintiff s approximate

    three

    visits

    inside

    petitioner s

    residence operating

    in

    what can

    now

    only

    be concluded as

    intentional clandestine routine(s] under

    guises/ruse

    to, after having once

    realized

    the

    value and accumulative infonnation~ take advantage o petitioner, due his

    age

    nd health

    result

    of disabling

    stroke. At no time

    plaintiff

    ever

    fulfilling

    any promises/suggestions

    him making available individual

    unknown

    to

    petitioner

    for

    book editin i nor after having

    believed

    to have apparently got

    all

    infonnation plaintiff

    could, no

    further

    mentioning o

    HBO

    productions.

    LONG before ending

    2015.

    petitioner

    learning ofhim being used in

    plaintiffs

    blog without ever any beforehand discussions.

    advance

    approvals; which

    would

    have

    not been authorized

    anyway,

    plaintiff

    was notified y U.S. Mail to his

    Abbeville, Alabama address, also faxed messages, and

    left

    telephone messages regarding

    petitioner

    having discovered items

    plaintiff

    h d in his

    possession,

    had never returned.

    Likewise came to surface in

    plaintiff s

    blog[s)

    w s

    petitioner s

    photo and information,

    none o which were pre-approved, when

    plaintiffh d

    been told since first meeting,

    told

    on

    that

    occasion,

    afterwards

    he w s not then ever authorized to audio

    and/or

    video for

    public

    domain petitioner s

    personal properties.

    TO further inflame

    petitioner s

    and

    plaintiff s

    straining several weeks old causal

    relationship,just

    prior ending 2015

    a petitioner s

    friend

    came

    to resjdence advising

    of

    plaintiff s additional

    postings,

    a

    blatant violation

    o

    specific

    instructions, further

    breaching

    of trust, beyond the pale; plaintiff

    had left the

    area

    headed for

    Canada still

    refusing to return before leaving all items

    taken from petitioner s

    residence

    after trust,

    or

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    16/55

    worst in violation o trust, rising to levc:l of heft. otherwise some of

    what

    plaintiffhas

    posted

    could not have

    otherwise

    come into

    his possession.

    WHEREFORE. Petitioner respectfully request that this

    Honorable

    Court

    moves

    orthwith in the issuing o an injunction for purpose of

    ordering

    plaintiffto make mute

    either in

    audio and/or video

    forms, or

    vi

    written narratives o same items; likewise that

    this

    Honorable Court compel plaintiff

    to

    move without delay in presenting

    before

    this

    court absolutely all

    documents,

    most specifically theil' origins,

    their

    owners, specific

    itemized release authorizations, name o ndividual authorizing plaintiff's total care,

    custody,

    and controls secretly

    forevermore,

    dates

    acquired,

    and whatever other pertinent

    requirements

    this

    Honorable Court deems necessary for satisfying this court involving

    these issues; same as, and/or similar in nature as read within the content ofplaintifrs

    complaint;

    known examples, 16,

    31, 76 [Q,U,R]

    E,G,H,M,J,L, AND

    77

    M,R;

    and

    all

    other styles, follllS,

    examples

    regardless their being in

    audio,

    video, photo, or

    written/typed

    evidences.

    CONCLUSION

    PETITIONER

    seeks

    not to intervene/interfere in

    any

    present or future planning by

    plaintiffto

    continue and further expand

    his profession, photojournalism,

    to

    each

    his own;

    just don't take

    advantage

    o hose seen weak and vulnerable by gaining their trust; getting

    access to private properties; when found

    out

    them

    being

    threaten, also having

    encouraged

    them t give personal

    television interviews

    on TV

    station

    without

    ever telling

    them

    that

    the 1elevision

    station

    RT is actually

    Russia

    Today after having many times given false

    hopes o

    government

    interventions

    via

    formal investigations initiated by

    U.S.

    Attorney s

    Office

    Alabama

    Atrorney

    General s

    Office Special

    Prosecutor Matt Hart

    CNN

    just

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    17/55

      ·

    -··---·---

    .......

    trust] l3A-8-1

    with

    accompanying subtitles: Definitions [01] Deception.

    Jtems

    A, B, C, D,

    E,

    and F;

    [2

    Deprive.

    Items A, B, D, and E;

    [06] Obtains.

    Items A and B;

    [07]

    Obtains

    or Exerts

    Control, or Obtains

    or

    Exerts

    Unauthorized

    Control; [ IOJ Property. Tangible

    or

    Intangible,

    the

    Location[s] hich can be

    Changed~

    [12 Stolen. Obtained

    by

    Theft; [13]

    Threat. Items A. F,

    and

    G;

    [14] Value. {Petitioner's Personal Book's} Market Value.

    N further support of petitioner's Standing, it is

    of

    weighty importance that thls

    honorable

    court

    be made

    cognizant

    of

    petitioner's

    own son

    having

    been

    selectively

    targeted

    for three

    criminal

    violations in Dothan.

    Alabama, since

    latest

    1996

    just

    before

    January 1997 FBI/city

    police

    surprise

    multi-states

    gambling raids never, not once has my

    son been able to file

    an

    official criminal incident/offense report to generate

    an FBI/CID

    official investigation after

    him having been

    a premeditated target for

    Criminal

    Impersonation,

    Alabama

    Title

    Code

    I JA-9-18, subsequently

    beaten

    unmercifully;

    Assault

    and

    Battery, Alabama Title Code l JA-06-22, having his front teeth knocked out

    and facial bone fractures, eye socket floor fractures damages, blurring

    visions. acute

    lacerations, severe contusions,

    and

    significant abrasions; and

    before

    the gambling trial

    due on October 1999

    federal docket

    in Montgomery, Alabama my son

    was

    approached

    by

    two bookies

    charged in the gambling cases

    and offered a 5,000.00

    bribe, Influencing

    a Witness, Alabama Title Code l3A-10·124,

    t

    influence his testimony; their beliefs him

    having been a victim tied

    to

    their

    illegal

    gambling operations could be called as a

    government witness especially since

    him being CriminalJy

    Impersonated at their

    main

    facility

    wa s

    apparent, although cases• Assistant U.S. Prosecuting Attorney, Ms. Ashton

    Holmes refused

    him s

    witness; bookies telling him tell

    me stop

    writing complaint t

    city,

    that

    it's making people

    upset.

    Strange, nobody ever been upset him being beaten; even

    hi

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    18/55

    miles away from residence

    t

    do Hve interview then was CBS then was Senate Judiciary

    Committee Chainnan also representatives from the Hilliary Clinton Presidential

    Campaign

    having an

    interest getting involved bringing national exposures none ofwhom

    ever

    materialized just

    not the

    right

    way to

    treat

    people.

    fully

    ~,

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    19/55

      · · - - · ·

    January

    26th,

    2016

    Federal

    Clerk's

    Office

    Attention: Ms. Johanna

    Gus

    J. Solomon Federal

    Court

    House

    700

    Stewart Street, Suite

    231

    O

    Seattle, Washington 98101

    RE

    CV16-00046JC.

    PLAINTIFF

    JON C CARROLL

    Dear Johanna c/o Federal

    CJerk's

    Office:

    I

    have this late afternoon received your package we discussed

    over

    telephone

    from

    last week's

    conversation

    regarding above mentioned styled ease number

    and

    plaintiff;

    and

    too,

    situations

    warranting

    this

    courfs

    immediate attentions

    as to such weighty

    circumstances to such extremes demanded you e contacted because

    of plaintiffs

    open

    remarl

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    20/55

    ,. • • --•& .-a&

    . . ,uw.aa

    ..:ra,a'l,la&. s.a,a,1,11...,.•J

    1...1......_.U..lt,.,A 'I-A.I,.,,

    " '41,.H"' - '

    JJ V~L ua,.. ,

    ""121.M\..IU..1

    VJ.

    Ul'- ' ~UJI 10 JG.lL U 1 /Ci

    ca~l:1

    il~d."° :lllrnffl-OB&RWo

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    21/55

    the

    up-redacted exposing

    or

    letteq

    multiple

    page s content

    listing

    other

    indiyidu11

    names;

    but f ir

    most sensitivewithin

    all the

    narrative

    are

    n mes

    of

    those

    who• in

    talking with tbl$ plaintiff. Mr.

    Jon

    c. Carroll. be

    bad

    been told of those whose

    identities

    that

    would never

    be

    topics

    of

    discussions,

    for their

    own

    priyatjes and

    safeties. yet this plaintiff knowing this did

    ewegiously

    wjth wantonness' n gli~

    make

    public apetitioner's

    personal and

    private letter to

    a federal authority regarding

    matter

    of public

    interest. This

    plaintiff

    during

    these visits operated

    under

    the guise while

    pretending

    to

    take pen

    and/or

    pencil written

    notes

    for organizational reference purposes

    while in

    assisting

    of

    this petitioner's

    book•

    s pages

    for

    editing, being required ofdue

    petitioner fallen by disabling stroke and unknown

    numbers

    of chapters in disarray, he

    seized

    on opportunity when

    once

    realized of their inflaming opportunities, immediately

    their

    sum

    totals for marketable

    values; has

    brought this petitioner's efforts

    now before

    this court.

    The

    official,

    and too

    private,

    documents

    at

    issue before this court, and as

    well

    s

    in

    the public domain are factual

    and

    authentic;

    in

    part, of he

    whole

    official internal

    investigation which

    was

    never obtained from this petitioner. Probably never known of

    before this letter to you,

    yolll

    office, this letter's date January 26

     

    11 2016 with exception

    of he known original I/

    A report

    ..

    ordered bwied by Police Chief

    John C.

    White;

    there

    has never been known of before the

    very

    first clandestine secretly made copy of this I/A

    report,

    which took

    place during

    latter winter months

    into the year

    2000.

    An

    attorney,

    respe

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    22/55

    Unconsciousable

    any

    defendant, required

    to appear

    before a judge during a pretrial

    for

    their

    being

    assigned

    own

    court appointed attorney;

    when

    after ori2inally defendant

    sought after, subsequentJy denied access to the very discovery which had caused

    defendant's arrest and jailing; required

    of

    for self-defense preparation[s] in a mwticipal

    court of no records; whereas, causing defendant thereafter to be compeUed to go before a

    higher court

    for

    purpose court's assigning

    of

    defendant's court appointed attorney. Letter

    to Alabama State

    Bar.

    that defendants are required

    to

    hire

    attorneys

    in

    ordg

    to aet

    J} PCrwork;

    letter

    to the

    Alabama Administrative

    Office of

    Courts,

    that

    defendants

    are

    being denied discovery for trial defense PNJ aration[s.]

    by

    prosecutors. Commonly

    unknown pretrial court appointed attorneys lack

    of

    interest and aloofness to make known

    their

    client before the court thru a vigorous defense and dynamic witness examination

    and

    evidence[s]

    presentation[s]. Unlawful

    evidences

    and/or existence

    thereof: "The law

    is

    clearly established that those tendering false infonnation to a prosecutor to believe he had

    probable cause to prosecute

    when

    he did not violated the

    CoDf

    utionaJ

    rights of

    the

    defendant."

    Doe

    v11

    State

    of

    Louisiana: 974 F .2d 36

    {U.S.

    5 Circuit]

    Anyone

    claiming t

    have such

    a vested interest

    in

    ''The Due Process Clause"

    has to

    look no further than taking the time to review public records applying to the

    State o

    Alabama's Comptroller

    Office assigned for designated :records keeping and

    reunbursements of fees and expenses for

    court appointed attorneys [indigent[s]

    vs. same

    attorneys representations

    and

    fees

    and costs

    for

    same or

    similar docketed type cases;

    therein nwnbe.-s speaks well for themselves. Washington vs. Glucksberg: 117 S. Ct.

    (197) "The

    due process clause guarantees

    more

    than fair process;

    the Liberty

    it

    protects includes

    more

    than

    an

    absence

    of

    physical restraints.

    The due

    process clause

    protects individual

    Liberty

    against certain government actions regardless of procedures

    used to

    implement them." Cutting

    W1bridled

    brazen plea deals

    by

    court appointed

    attorneys for convenience

    of

    all

    other parties; rather than sole purpose of court, the

    intended justice

    for

    defendant

    must

    surely rise

    to

    and above understood levels best

    described within

    the

    Black's

    Law Book

    definition: "dump-truck lawyers".

    Rights

    to

    Courts-Access: Intentional obstruction o n inmates' access lo the courts is precisely

    he

    sort

    o

    oppression

    the

    JI Amendment and section

    1983 are

    intended

    to remedy.

    right

    of

    access to the courts

    is substantive

    rather

    than procedural." Morello vs. J1mes:

    810

    F .2d 344 [U.S. 2°d Circuit

    1987).

    Furthennore

    in

    support

    of

    aforementioned:

    ~The

    Right of access to the courts is one of he priyiJe~s and immunities under Article

    IV.

    n

    aspect

    of

    th

    Fitst Amendment, and

    fo1 U1ded

    on

    the

    Due

    Process Clause-" Smith vs.

    Mosccber; 899

    li

    2.d 940

    (U.S. tolh

    Circuit)

    1990]

    ·

    The United

    States Constitution gaanntees alJ-individuals, as

    well

    as guards

    against any indlvldual having been vfol•ted, denied

    of

    their Equal Rights,

    Protections,

    and

    Due

    Processes'; additionally as defined within

    the

    cont.ent

    of Black's aw Book,

    a

    defendant assurances

    of

    having

    a qualified

    fair

    and

    equal

    court appointed defense

    counsel[s] addressed

    in

    definition; The Strickland Standard" and exercising all rights

    providing defendant's case defined in definition, "Scintilla RµJes

    of

    Evidence[§].

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    23/55

     ..._

    alj i t1't

    t :

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    24/55

      ~

    thy.

    20, 2005

    Nobody. wi..11

    e veit kTLaw wlr.a.t

    lr e 11144.

    tlii.nJ.ln.g,

    111h.i.l.e.

    d.1tlvlng.,

    lr.ome.

    tlr.at

    cold dait.k 1tai A

    d1ti.11Lln.,

    9an.u«1tJ n i te

    alte.it. Al,

    2 P~

    to

    /0

    1 /ri

    4.ltL{l tiui.p.fl.llle.n.t

    cortple.te.d.

    Hi. 1. cu . 4

    lte.at.u

    pA.ObabLy.

    fcad ,ju.4.t 4fa.1tte.d.

    wa.11.111.i.119-

    i.t. . i .ntuloa g.ood.. Would.

    lte. have.

    bu.n.

    LL4.te.ni.ng. to hl4 f-avo1ti.le.

    it.a.di.o

    4f4ti.on. Oil

    i.n.

    deep

    4uo-con4.ci.ou4

    thou1Jr.t4. of

    aciite.1t4

    i.nvolvi.TLJ lr.i.4

    •01tk: ILLe.iaL d1tu,4 ln.ve.d.ti.

    ~ati.on.4?

    To

    1e.t

    mo1te.

    com/01ttahle.

    Aad lte.,

    LLAe

    a.lot

    o/

    •e.n

    a/ie.1t.

    ie. t t lnf off wo1tk

    1

    Loo4e.n.e.d Jr.i.4

    ti.e.

    1

    4. knot and 4hi.Jtt c0Lla1t but

    ton?

    01t

    wa.4. lr e

    ma1be.

    tlr.i.n.kln9- abo.ut

    hi.4 111i.fe.

    1

    hl4 4.0n.

    dau1Ate.~

    kn.0111ln1

    W44

    cu4toma1tv

    tlr.e.y. 1te.

    1te.a.dv- foll

    be.J;

    tltou1A AOt a.4.Le.e.p

    untll

    afte.1t hi.4

    e.ve1t1 wo1tk-ni.te. 4.afe 1te.tu1tn lr.ome.?

    Could Lt

    have been.

    po44.i.ble. tA¢t di.4tcin.t he.a.d.li.t.eA 1te./le.cte.d

    ln Ai 4

    1te.a1t

    vlew

    mi.1t./lo1t

    di.dn.'t

    ie.t

    lr i 4 cittur.tlon? Had e pa44ed

    a

    pa11.ked vehlcle

    afte1t tu/lni.n1 off Rock~

    b~cin.clr.

    ~oad onto Youn1

    A•e11.lca DAlv wi..tAout /lai.4ln1 anv- eau4e fo1t alaAm, noA

    4o•e. Aen4e

    o/ U4fe.Jl.cv? 011. •a~be. Aavi.ni 1one. coaple.te.11 un-noticed bv Alm

    a paAked ve.hlcle ju,t be~ond neaA

    cuAve.

    Lagln.i ln walt th.at

    cold

    daAk Tue.4.aa, nlte app1toacnln~

    tAe.

    o clock nou4 wi.tA lt4.

    en1lne

    i.d.Li.n.1 .d.Lle.n.tlj

    wAi..Le. e.d.a,u.t

    dl4.a.Lpati.n.~ .a.l.0111l1 tli.e. occupant.

    d4Lve11.

    a.wai.tln1

    anxlou4LI /oA

    , l~aL

    to

    acce.Le.Aate. mhe.Aeh1

    tAAu4t

    ln~ a Loni con.tlne.ou4 wAlte.-111.a,l4h

    fl«IIIJllLn1

    4~oke. thAOUfA e.4.cape

    11.oute.?

    looklni ln.

    dl11.e.ctlon o/ hl4 hoae ,oon ca,ae. lnto vl,euo Aou4e.

     

    4

    po11.ch-Llte ,Ai..nnln1

    b11.L1h~L1

    4l•lLa11. to that

    of

    a

    4 aaan'4 ,ho11.e

    beacon iuldi.n1 hlM home. lnto

    4afe.-lr.ci11.bo11..

    Slowlnf

    du11.ln

    1

    ftl

    4

    ap•

    p11.aach

    to make

    11.l1h~ tu11.n. oTLto d~lv~a~

    what waA e

    tAi.nkln.1,

    ee

    ln~

    the

    ca11.po11.t doo11. into

    hi..,

    home? Aft II. 4ioppc.d.

    dld

    he.

    l t

    a

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    25/55

    e.xt4a

    mlnu.te loniett.

    1l4ten.lAJ to

    4adLo,

    01t

    W44 e ~evlewln.i ln

    hi.4

    mlnd

    once mo~e iatlte.4lAJ ltl4 wo•k-da., 4 tnouiAtA

    a/te.tt.

    t«tt.n

    ln.~

    of/

    vaAlcle.

    1

    4

    e.n1lne.?

    la.,

    t

    t ~

    fUlck /La.4h

    of

    6ackup

    Llte.4

    ioLni

    /1(.oa d1tlve. po4ltlon to pa•k,

    04

    •a16e

    Al4

    foot ~e.m.aved f4om

    b4ake petal

    4wltcA a/te.tt.

    i.n

    pa~keJ po,ltlon Mn.kn.owlng.l.v to Ai.m

    4Uldln1 a AltnaL

    that wltAln

    a. nln.ute would place Al4

    4ou.L ln

    a

    U /e.-daatlt

    4ttt.u.19-Le.-----------111ltlclt

    111ltltln.

    adJi.tlon.aL

    cou.pLe. o/

    111.04a m[nute., wouLJ La4e.?

    V/1,)at

    wel(.e hLt.

    tltou.1J,.t4

    u.ac:lti.n.J

    /04 ve.lti.c.l..e. '4 ln.tulo1t. dootr.

    han.dle.

    to

    ope.n.,

    4n.J

    whlle.

    exltln~

    4tandln.f

    u.p4l1ht

    tho4.e

    fe.w

    un

    known. to Alm

    hl4

    La4t t toufltt,. ALoni 4lde

    of

    ve.ltlcle ~lth_doo~

    open..e.d wlde he. 4food

    •llhoue.tte.J a1aln4.t ltl, lto111.e.',

    po~clt-llte.

    i.Ll.ut1ti.n.a.ti.on. a.n.d wltlti.n 111.i.lll4.e..co1'd4 wcu

    ,ta.R.ln.g.

    4fto .t 11.·a119 e.

    i.n.to

    doubLed-ha.411.e.L, ~I

    4a.,ued-o/l 4hot1un

    •u11le

    /l11.e.

    fLcuhe4..

    04~iLnaLL, tAou1kt a paA4ini v.enlcLe A 6ackfl1tln.1 hla fami.Lv

    hea4d

    a Loud 1&l.l /011. hlA wlle. fUlcklv the11.eafte.11. ln Au ch a ,ound

    Ahe. hoLte.d to dooa11. open.ln1 to fln.d hiA Ai1tu11Lin1 io 1e.t to h ~

    and AtiLL

    cohe11.e.nt eaou~A .Aen •eeln1

    Ai 4

    cAlld11.en to

    tu1tn awa~

    collap4lni on. ca11.po11.t

    /Loo11.

    to

    avoid

    Al4

    child1te.n

    wltnf ..IJ.alni Alm

    dlein~. He. die.d LA 111lfe 4

    Lap aRd

    411 a t awav f~o• hlA cltlLJ4~n

    1

    4

    vle.111 without eve11

    4pea.kln.i

    Au11.11.oundLd 61 ,Aotiun

    1

    A pelleted em-

    he.dd.e.J. wall..• 9an.a.u.a~v JI 1978, Tu.u.dav- app1toxi.m.a.te.lv 10:40 P/11

    f/lli.at

    di..d

    lte. know?

    Viii.at h.ad he. u,i.f.nu.4.eJJ IJ/lzat/111/to 1 1144

    lte

    lnve.4tl.-

    iatln.~

    that •andateJ

    Al, aA4a.A4lnatlon? At

    home

    l~

    11.ont

    of famliv?

    Fo4

    pa4t 27

    ge.a11.4 who ha4 e.ven

    11.eaLLv

    ca11.e.d, and

    ~A J-

    not

    the.g?

    N«~co~lc

    4

    DLte.c~lve. S~11.,e.ant

    Ro6e.~t

    l4Ck4on L, 6u4led in the.

    ~ate..4. 0/

    Heav£n Ce.m.eta4u

    DothaJJ,

    ALhLa-a.. H

    ' W44 . f~le.n.Jf

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    26/55

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    27/55

    II. S. S_.na to t R£.clv:url Sh. t> L I,'/_

    Pt

    CAM~cA

    St~cct

    Roo• C-561

    ~ont,o•&"V, lla.6a~a 36/0f

    .

    )

    i,o.,e.•n~tt Bo6

    'iU.l~v

    600

    uute."

    A"a"uc

    f:ont10~&4j, l aba~~ 36130

    ·'tu11. o//i..cc.'-t

    publJ

    .c.lv up1tu4, , '/ c~nee.ttn.a. an.ti

    co•p1u4lo,u.

    / .J1t.

    /Q.~U; a/ la&Wtla. fe•n-z.~u 1'4 • •~.,_t.Q.[e.~ l ollo ./Jt1j l..a I

    ru.t.J

    ··

    f '-4&1U01t.ttrv

    a.n.:I

    4cut

    "J.d,11.l.,al,l.,. / 11/atizo,.a6Le

    i&1t.

    r.1othu,

    ._

    '

    a.n.d /(l~h. '-

    1

    -t. ;-.."le./ wlille

    '.l.trJa.i.t.ln.;;.

    «1&1tl.t1u4LJI ttnv, n.&1114i tttu4.t-

    ln;.

    UJi.th.

    ;.ua.ude., Ir.ope. a.n..J

    pu:;e.u. tl,.e.~

    1

    Ll 401111 /i..n.il ,cuol.ve.

    j_

    a4J

    Aa,

    ..

    elo4u1t~ tAi.44 c.AtLd'•

    44 :e

    ~~tu~tt •

    .Mi11lo1J4li o1ll cttlmi.nal.

    ar.t..t1.

    f 4il,,uLrl a._ 01t111.en.·U.o,a&J bv th ..

    ca..u.J 1//e.c.t.eA 1111. IILa.6a.:rii.a.n.JJ. can.not

    be a.Jd,te.u.~.r v

    i'""' o//lc.u,

    CfJ-T ,

    Jl1e.n.

    01.&.,u .

    a.11."'

    c .

    :d,4.Hltf

    uttC011rJ.111n.l1 tuai.7u"- cru.e4 t1J.11l11;

    '

    )on.-. un11.He.11,./•,A .~i

    :1u1t r , /Lcu ,•.1m11 q11'1.U./v,,s. f.u t ,Hu ~'luri.L

    :i.l,i.nie.44«-4 11.,d {JU{•l.i.c.

    co11,4l,../e1t.a~lon.4

    6e. e c. t.e,,. f.?

    ..

    ,.

    Janua~9 JI, 97~

    N«4COflc:4 'o leL

    r.t&etlv~

    s~-,e~nt

    R~b~,t

    ~ ~ C ~ 4 ~ n ~4•~A4ln~l~~, ?J ~ ~ 4 4 u~ll.~4olv~1.

    /f:4 • 1.8. 1~t.·Ule.1 an,.J fi-1, tit.ic::C:.e Pa,111..~u

    6ot.~ IJ

    ,A.l.;la 4C.lt1Jol

    t

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    28/55

    Tna Ho4a1&«6la RLcAc4d SA&Lb1

    {'

    .S,

    S n11to1t

    1

    Stat& r,/

    t'l.l«, 1..a.

    N•11t«~LLLa

    lnte•n4tLo~aJ.

    ~ 4t••t

    1000 ~l&n. Haath Boulg~a~~ 120127

    Hunt,~£lLe,

    ~l«&••• 3582•

    D.~. s+.•toA JA&J.6,,

    Jou1t

    &J/tp1tu.e..J

    C:0/lC:UiU.

    a.1ti conp«.u.Lon..&

    /01

    , ...a, o/

    Al.a.&11aci: t&CJt.

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    29/55

    l,

    T11.~

    /lon.011.46Le.

    T

    u.11...J

    lvelle.tt

    J ( .f ,u.-a11t.«t Lv .

    2

    n..f lJ i..t

    11.

    l.e

    t

    S clt.e.

    o:~ A

    4.'1.oama

    3500

    t44ta11.n

    £ouL&11~1ti G250

    /.;ont; J111t 1t:h AL~6e1nf4 ]6116

    l

    e.a,1

    i t.p.tU&Jl

    tJat i.ve. l11e.u.tt.:

    JuLv, II ,

    2005

    It

    L•

    l ~ tJ l lab. l

    to

    c:01tcLa:fa

    vou.11. t>//.i.cc.4

    I po.&Lti..01&4 e.1ut.t.L4 t.lr.a.t ,.,,._

    . ;;i

    Sene1to11.

    S~e.J..b~',

    LnvoL11Ln~ t11.~;l~

    m14te11.lou4

    di..a.appca11.~nc~ o/ ALab«•a

    ta..&n.aj,44 .... ~czta.lc.c.

    HoL/.r,wa.:1.

    O,.u. {),MJ&l.f' tltoug.n 4.t11.4LL gcAu. Loud.Ly. ;

    Senato4

    1

    4icon~ll.n4 /0,1 11.e..aaLv~. W&

    too a4

    anLt~i wi.t~

    S-1lato,1

    1

    4

    caLL

    t,~u-t. fi,1

    lie

    m:oie.

    prt.11.tlci..pa.ti.rr.,;,

    pu11lii..nj, 4'.JCpe11.tl4& y.e.t. P"-"l"""'~d,

    avoi.d-

    i..11..l

    "-"If

    pc. lc.e}'t,i..1'rt4 o / ina:lve.1ttc.11c~4.

    ile.«11; u Illa.A/I "i..Li.u.

    he.,ut4

    1

    1 l

    ,iu"ti.n.;

    c:r.ichii.ti.)i~

    a.11~

    llUJ.t

    1

    cont.L l4 .i,u.a. anxi.01.u1te u

    /off.

    /IJ.s..

    Ho.LLowaJ

    '_. ..

    4.a.,l.e.

    11.etu11.n

    ho,&1

    ,~d cL04u11.e4

    /11.om

    tlr.i.•

    1tlJhtmczA&l4h &v~nt

    ~4& da4.e.4~Llli'o/

    I

    aLL

    FBI

    ~ e t i

    and Lnve4ti.jati..ve

    4f..4.0ult~&4.

    ,~'r,w Mtudl.n.9-

    aLl co,.u.te.1. t, .te.4.p~ct,

    en..J

    .tev U.Jr.CIJ,

    /011. n4. HoLLo·w'l./ 4

    . .

    pa.ica.n.t.1

    1

    ,,allli.4v, a,d

    /1tLe.11.J.,_ we .u.-11,u.,t 1', 1ou11.

    ",~/i.aM

    4. Vllo&

    i.4te11t .4t,

    c:on-

    1

    C?.t/14

    1

    t:tJ1r1p«-1~'i.on.4

    Joi..n.Ln9-

    wi.tA Se.n.ato,1 S te..lh:1,

    ucoulf.afi.1L9'

    St .1ta.Co,1.

    :J,,_{:'.'

    .Se.44C:.o,u, ala•, wi..tlr. ~ove,1no.t 8ob 'hll.e..11- wla1J luu too

    6u.,i

    con:t.a.ctll.d

    c.a.l.1-

    \

    i..n.,,~

    lo1t f&J

    1

    4 ·.'&qua../.

    pcutlc.i.paf.i.o,i.4

    e:cl.a.tl.n.J. t.tR.i.fU& Un.C.ORll:101&1.tt

    UllU,ufve.J

    .Stat,z. ol

    Alt&6f.lllla.

    e4,4~,1,,

    a.LL

    lea.11ln.a.

    on.,z. cor.amc,n de.nomi..n.a.to1t

    1

    / QJJJ

    ur./o,1c.uz~nt..

    .. ,

    1\

    1

    :.tn:cotlc, /JO .tttlv& Sug.e.a.n.t

    "l'r1Li.ce.

    r>//i.cu. 7?ooe4t Pa.clu.on.

    tU

    4a.44i.lltite.J 26

    .;:,~cu4 a ; a ,J.i...,d i.n

    wi.}e.

    1

    4 at,-A..

    fl/4.

    ;l.B. Ra.a.4J.c.:1- a.n.d / ;-,.. 71taci..a

    Ha.111.Le.tt.

    '

    bot.it

    l l 1

    . 0UJl~ i.1& t1tullk

    o/.

    va.lai.c.1.e. r.1u1td11.,1ul ue.cutlon 4f.~L& 6

    fl&a.1&4

    a.~o.

    'I

    N

    ,, ewottt.hJ

    fli.o..

    Ha.1111.e.tt.

    '.t.

    /a.tit.~tt

    W44

    /e.l.LoUJ

    poLi.ce.

    "//i..c.e.1&

    'JJltla

    31.ekun.,

    Ai.m.-

    ,1J.e.(.'

    ,t11.l)wn.l1tf}~U1td1.11.

    4U4{'i.< t.OU,4

    C:LllCU IU.tiz.nc4c., da.v4 p11.lo1t. t.o 1"""d.

    ;,,l'4V

    t.?.-1ti.-

    111 MJ-

    i.nvoLvi.n.j.

    de.a.tit. o/ 6 .:z.c,~ m.a.n.,

    Co1t.pol\aL

    noh&At ,1a.wLe.tt lllf ;lo.li..,:e. Aca- (l..81,;

    .~

    It

    i.&r&d, IZA Wa4 /

    Q.C,~40~

    /fi

    1

    / Q.lll.i.L, 4half.

    ln.,; r: n

    I, t.n. tit «n.d J.lt

    OU/

    e,i

    · .

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    30/55

    T t'f.

    i an.qca.61.a. l4••L

    ~1&1&. S,.ltlt

    .St~t~

    S&1i~to•,

    St&t&

    ot ~La6--.

    'labaac

    StAt•

    ' ••••,

    7);.C

    I I I So11tA

    U11l.•1t

    ,t,ac.•t

    f::on:t1-o•e.1ty

    1

    .~.laiua 36106

    I

    .

    ·'

    iJ

    t . u

    Suat••

    -S..

    u.A,

    911.l1

    /]

    1

    200$

    i

    .1e.

    U-f~~t •I 1oa.•

    •I/Le•

    to

    j•l.n.

    a,Lt.,\ U.S. SM to•

    'IU.cl,.«11.i

    Slttll>v

    ' ....

    :uid

    C0aatt4Lc«t• ,

    .....

    Llit~--~t, c•ncac"-1; Clld co-,44~~-n.,& ,n

    ..

    oi~,4~ ike

    . iu

    £.c.t,

    rz.11([1cLe.f

    a11..,1t.0111tdi.1tf

    ,a./ 11.s,e,1: 4

    tli.•t1pf' ~1u1.Act.

    4 / Ala6a.a:i

    t4,.:.~

    ¢ f~4 M,. la.~l&& l~LL••a1, G4d ~oo

    S&ll4t••'•

    S~alb1'~ po~ttLoA c&l.fi~;

    .~u

    llla&e.

    ~Bl

    ··,1tvutt.g.c.tl.1fe. ptut.LcLp11.tl11a•.

    fl11.t.'/ l lU.UI.

    tAu.c.

    •cit.ta."~

    CJ••4nd. •tt~Q•t 1t.-.&ttLetlo,u, «l.l •lf&Lla&lc cu,~t,

    ~-

    t:44is

    Av~i.l.ahL~

    . .

    ,up&di.U t1t1i1..l;

    L11.

    e.ffo4f,_4 to •«i.e..,& c•itfL1'11 L1 J ao1t11t.Lnp. ucot.Lo1t.al. 1u.•

    . . . '

    d~fl.6

    •• Holl•~4i'•

    /t111Ll1 a.\•

    e.,cp&clfl.tlcLA~t UtJ.Ao~A

    t~ p~bltc tALen.

    u"'"'e..u•i1uhlti g.•L•f•• · S1t;u ly ju,t.tLc.c.

    //IIL°J.L

    .f.ttcvLve. 6&Ln.g.Ln.g.. 1t.u.,lve. tuz.d

    ~ l 04U4 wLth

    A4.

    H~llo,x,.v'4 ~·,~

    i t&t~•n A-···

    Su«toc ~SA-.lh1'" u..Juv-ttlf..t "" ..

    n.~t.uu.t.lt.v CJ1.li.i1.ti.n.p. 4r,rpp~1t.t

    f1t.o,11. a l.

    rHr,.-..rJ. t.h"l.

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    31/55

    .......

    ..

    . .. ·

    ·--· .

    . .

    .

    ,

    .

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    32/55

    The Honorable

    Richard Shelby

    United States

    Senator,

    Alabama

    1 Lee

    Street B-28

    Fede:ral Court

    House

    Montgomery, Alabama

    36104

    Re

    Re.;eJection CDmJmign Advertising s Content; Being Here.

    Listening, and

    Helping

    Dear Senator

    Shelby:

    Thank you

    for your

    annual

    visit this past

    week

    ago to our Circle City, Dothan~

    realizing

    how

    your schedule, especially during latter part

    of

    he

    week

    is

    full

    and

    demanding, anxious to

    return

    to your family and friends is most applaudable. Although

    the time

    set

    aside

    for

    our

    having

    anticipated

    attending

    your speaking engagement

    here

    was

    required of altering, and subsequently thereafter missed

    you

    before your leaving.

    Irregardlessof aforementioned, it

    had

    been genuinely hope that

    while

    here your

    schedule

    had

    been planned

    out

    far enough

    in

    advance to be flexible enough

    to, if

    not at

    surely visit, at a minimwn

    to have had

    at least telephoned the

    widow, Ms. BilUe Jackson;

    of this citfs, black, shotgun assassinated

    at

    near point blank range

    City

    of Dothan Police

    Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson.

    He was

    my

    friend fellow

    police

    patrol officer.

    ery long overdue is

    the

    resolving his case, closure for his widow and family.

    Senator

    Shelby. you

    may remember our

    having exchanged

    correspondences

    during

    the

    tragic aftennath involving the

    disappearance

    of Birmingham, Alabama high school

    graduate teenager Ms. Natalie Holloway in A tuba A tragedy too that remains

    unresolved

    today; that

    you may also

    remember

    that you,

    your office, called for, encouraged

    the F.B.I.

    to go and render assistance

    to

    Arubian investigators, likewise your public position

    pertaining

    to

    such a sensitive

    issue was

    echoed

    by

    this state s then current governor,

    Governor

    Bob R iley.

    l mention these things as a preface t

    following:

    Police Officer Robert Jackson was

    shotgunned

    down during a January 31st moonless, cold, rain drizzling night in front of his

    residence getting

    out

    of his police car

    with his wife

    and two

    small

    children inside their

    home

    awaiting his return

    home

    from work.

    Hardly

    a day

    goes

    by

    now

    that other states are

    commonly

    witnessed by mainstream and cable news honoring present--day shot/killed

    police officers. Yet,

    this

    state has never recognized and honored with

    equal

    enthusiasm,

    which should have been witnessed by other states involving

    this

    officer s widow;

    SffOULD, NOW

    RISE

    TO

    A

    LEVEL OF YOUR

    OFFICE S

    IMMJ; DIATE

    CONCEB S,

    TO BE

    lN CONCERT WITH YOUR RE-EL~CTIQN CAMPAIGN ADVERTIZING S

    KEY

    WORDS, HELP AND NEED. This officer

    was

    drafted, he volunteered for service,

    serving four

    yeliU'

    tour of duty, a Vietnam War vetenm, Honorably Discharged, returning

    home to become

    a police officer

    is

    deserving of

    more

    respect from his aovemment than

    him,

    his widow/family ever received. IS HE

    DUE ANY LESS.

    THAN OTHER

    STATE?

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    33/55

    I have been for a

    longtime, years, respectfully seeking

    to

    have Governors

    Riley

    and

    Bentley

    extend

    this state s

    compassion and

    goodwill

    to

    this officer s widow; without

    success;

    not

    even a

    call

    or letter, much less a personal visit.

    Many

    times I

    have

    sought

    after this

    state s

    govemor,

    Governor

    Robert

    Bentley

    preparing

    a

    bill for

    presentation

    before

    the

    legislature for

    their

    approval:

    Governor George C.

    Wallace signed

    a

    proclamation for a $10,000.00 reward, never been ny movement on all during these

    years;

    that

    the state

    move

    to convert such proclamation s title to an ct of compassion s

    title

    in memory o Officer Jackson, since his case will never be solved

    Senator Shelby sir,

    do you

    not agree, it is way past time that this police officer, as

    if

    he were an

    officer

    in any

    other state be

    given his equal and legal

    resolution s

    closure,

    i

    not for him;

    at minimwn

    for

    his widow, his son

    Robert,

    Jr. and

    daughter?

    Thanki

    you

    in

    advance I

    am

    hl rii~~

    003

    Glasgow

    Drive I

    Dothan, Alabama

    36301

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    34/55

    October 29, 2015

    John Carroll

    he

    Henry County Reporter

    Post Office Box 2

    Abbeville,

    Alabama

    36310

    John, this being another presidential debate day's night

    has

    drawn

    me to

    reflect

    on my

    notes

    from

    when we last spoke on the phone, about 1pm early afternoon

    of

    the

    nd

    scheduled

    debate. During that phone conversation

    you told me

    that either you had been.

    or

    were

    in a

    meeting

    with

    someone

    and

    was

    retwning my

    call to

    you

    from

    earlier

    in

    day.

    That you had

    a hot

    Jead on someone who may have been

    a on

    the

    scene

    ' crime

    scene

    witness where girls murdered was last thing

    you

    told me.

    Then, during your return call

    to me, you

    told

    me that.

    yes, you were coming

    by

    after

    getting through

    with

    whatever

    it was

    you

    were

    doing, would

    be

    maybe

    about

    4:00 p.m.

    to

    which

    I

    obviously

    said fine.

    That

    phone

    call

    was the Jast

    time speaking with

    you even

    after having my

    calling and leaving messages over next couple, three,

    of

    days

    ~thout

    having ever heard

    back from

    you.

    Then,

    in response

    to my

    last left

    mesmtge, when

    you

    do

    call

    back

    telling me

    that

    you have been cow

    shopping,

    and that I

    should

    fish or

    cut bait

    was

    rude

    and

    unbecoming

    what

    I believed the caJiber

    of

    your pen;ona. Had you appeared

    as you had said you were, you would have been

    hen: to

    participate in a Conference Call;

    but you were a no show that I had

    to

    make an excuse for after planning on

    your

    being

    here. not by guessing no, as direct result

    of

    your own word.

    John, you may

    take such

    as

    insignificant, I place a lot

    of

    confidence

    in the

    honoring

    of

    another's word,

    in

    return their being responsible for only doing no more no less

    than

    what

    it

    is

    that

    they themselves

    have

    told

    me

    they were

    going to

    do.

    Seen this day and time as

    minute,

    was

    a

    part of

    the

    way

    I

    was

    raised

    from

    childhood,

    as well

    too strive to

    treat

    others

    as

    I

    would

    want

    them to

    ~ me, and I have, as

    best

    I could, but of course like

    anything else, there has been exceptions; and that when J told someone something that

    was

    going

    to cause them

    to make

    dccision[s] b sed on

    what

    I told them,

    thetefore

    I

    became duty

    bound and obligated to them

    first

    and foremost into that

    day,

    evening, night,

    week, month.. . . . . . . . . hat is to say, unless, should,

    in

    the event I saw ch'cumstances

    arising far

    enough

    beforehand, whereby

    dictating

    that

    I postpone any agreed upon

    meeting or

    obligation;

    here again I was

    duty boood/obligated

    tO notify other either

    that

    l

    was

    not coming, or that

    I was

    running late, exact time unknown, others should

    make

    their

    own plans accordingly; therefore

    not

    leavins

    them

    standing alone alongside the

    street

    curb looking

    up

    the street to see

    i wus

    next vehicle

    comin&,

    We

    first began building upon our confidential,

    exposing

    corruption, relationship when I

    told you of my need

    for someone to help

    me in the editina of

    a

    book

    Mitten,

    but

    since

    stroke

    was havine

    difficult

    time

    organizing materials Mitten for editing.

    You 1old

    me

    of

    knowing a

    lady from

    Australia that

    you

    could contact

    who was well

    versed

    in

    editing. I

    invited

    you

    to my home, we sat on front

    porch, you

    wanted

    to

    make

    an audio

    of

    our

    conversation, I ae,eed

    J

    trusted

    you,

    only

    before your using audio tape's content that I

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    35/55

      · · · ·· .....

    wanted

    a dubbins

    of

    conversation s entirety for transcribing onto

    paper for my

    reading;

    after all since

    my

    having

    been

    fallen

    by

    disabling stroke

    as

    I had

    told you

    I

    had

    a concern

    about my verbalizing skills, therefore

    seeldng

    BCCUl tlC) . To this day you have yet to bring

    or send the audio s copy which we have both

    agreed

    upon,

    even

    witnessed by the lady

    having joined in the conversation. True you brought me a pink

    thing,

    I

    had

    no

    use

    for

    since I had

    no

    way

    of

    using it to really know what its content contained.

    Then after further discussions we moved on into the arena of special H O productions

    to

    get coverage; then lastly you were talking about doing articles yourself

    leadin&

    off with

    my

    friend

    Jackson s

    assassination.

    Then you

    decided be best

    to go

    with the

    prls

    stories.

    So John really I don t know what direction the original goal

    moved

    in; I was supporting

    your suggestions in obtaining

    end

    results.

    John, l

    realize

    coming from me this is liken to water off a duck s back, an old fan, sitting

    at home

    with

    a

    lot

    of

    time

    on

    his

    hands;

    but the

    reality is

    in the

    facts.

    Since your

    first

    visit

    to my home you have left

    me

    anticipating your coming back

    to

    visit my home on

    no

    less

    than three separate occa..11:ions when

    factually

    you

    never

    did on any, and which

    I

    consider

    wo.rst, the bad manners

    not

    bothering to

    call

    in

    advance

    advising that you wasn't, very

    rude

    and

    disrespectful, not only involving me,

    but too

    of

    my wife.

    we could have had

    time for

    other

    plans maybe.

    First

    time I remember well, you decided to go

    fishing

    you

    said, the next time was about your cows, and nex.t time was

    that

    you

    had just to

    much

    to

    do at home; and

    all

    that s fine, I have never expected my being any priorities in your life,

    but I have expected the same respect and courtesies

    that

    you yourself respect

    from

    others.

    Apparently putting us at cross beliefs, but in our own pursuits for righting wrongs; while

    I will

    concede rm

    sucking flexibility s hind tits, confined to home resulting due to health,

    and unable to drive. So good luck. BUT l

    STILL

    W )NT

    AND

    EXPECT MY

    COPY OF

    AUDIO UNEDITED WE PLUS YOU DO

    HAYE

    MY DISC OF

    TI:IE

    PHENIX

    STORY

    MOVIE"

    I

    HAVE NOT

    RECIEIVED

    BACK EITHER.

    s

    I

    trust

    our

    friendship

    will continue

    wtlmpaired.

    Our city, county, state, and nation s good people, the poor and

    minorities, have been denied and

    victimized of

    heir equal rights so callously and

    deliberately for way to long

    all

    that can should always never forget them

    Throughout my adult

    years,

    in retrospect, I

    can

    take pride that I treated others

    os

    I

    would

    want

    them to treat me, and to

    be

    as good as my

    word to them,

    unless otherwise prevented

    from doing so, advising as soon as

    p0$Sible.

    John,

    [ do not have any reservations that you are a good and decent man with well

    intentions and applaud you for your contributions; none ofwhich are

    my

    issues with

    you,

    othenvi simply put, I WAS

    RAISED

    THAT A MAN S

    WORD

    IS IIlS

    BONDI

    Be

    r 1;

    J -M ./~

    K~s .

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    36/55

    October

    30, 2015

    Ml .

    John Carroll

    The

    Henry County

    Report

    Post Office Box 2

    Abbeville~

    Alabama

    36310

    Fax 334)460-9706

    John:

    Possibilities existing

    in

    lieu of infonnal meeting

    that could

    give an

    officially

    witnessed

    and legal

    deposition;

    my

    after

    thoughts

    regarding

    this

    matter rises specifically

    due

    the

    fact

    of

    my

    age and

    health;

    but primarily

    anticipation

    for my

    considerations

    o

    equal

    and

    reasonable potential for my family s

    future

    securities resulting from this documentary

    project; their

    personal

    protections and financial

    soundness

    is

    o my

    utmost concerning

    importance should in the interim I should

    not

    survive the full extent net profit

    gain,

    the

    full and unknown extents o your hard work s documentary s success involving this

    area s corruptions

    paid

    for

    on the back

    o he

    poor and minorities

    is surely

    destined

    to

    become not only a national but internationally acclaimed achievement.

    I will lend

    Wlto

    YOU my support towards the ac.complishina o

    your

    resolve, in further

    review

    o my

    accumulations, such transfer ofinfonnation will require

    o

    you,

    your time

    and patience; having said this;

    the

    contributions

    heretofore for

    the

    record will

    be

    rewarding not

    only

    for both,

    you

    and

    myself;

    but even more

    so

    for all those having been

    victimized, made

    selective targeting for the

    violations and/or denials

    o

    their basic

    equaJ

    rights.

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    37/55

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    38/55

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    39/55

    Message directly from

    J

    io response to your message

    to

    ntm of last

    •·

    {I had nothing to do with this but be the

    intermediary.

    ·tRemind him

    th t

    i am on

    the

    streets of Canada trying

    to

    avoid bad

    people '

    That

    I

    am fully capable of

    re1urning

    and beating his elderly ass'

    1

    H,~t

    ail l ,are

    ab :iut

    i;:; justice and t,a\fe moved thls

    torward more

    than

    anyone else the past 10 years

    with

    exception of Brian

    Dowling

    It I had

    not

    gotten

    these

    t 1es

    out ot ttle

    country they would be sealecs

    forever due

    to

    a corrupt judge

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    40/55

     Message directly frorn J

    in

    response to your message to him of last

    l P·

    {I had nothing

    to

    do

    with

    this bm be the Intermediary.)

    "Remind him

    that

    I

    am

    on

    the

    streets of

    canada trying to avoid

    bad

    people"

    '1'hat

    I

    am

    fully

    capable of returning and beating

    his

    elderly ass"

    That all I care about is justice and have moved this torward more than

    anyone else the past 10 years with exception of Brian Dowling•

    ft I had not gotten tnese

    t es

    out ot the country

    tnev

    would be

    sealed

    forever due to a corrupt judge

    November

    19,

    2015

    Mr.

    John Carroll

    The Henry

    county Report

    I

    write

    now

    in response

    to

    this

    faxed

    message received 11/19

    2015 from you

    via 914-939-1476@ 03:38p ident i f ied

    as

    bein

    "from J"

    No doubt, that while in the pursuits for just ices,

    attemptin

    to

    make wrongs

    r ighted

    daily

    schedules

    are

    altered. I f

    I hav

    ever failed to

    compliment

    you and/or

    thank

    you for any

    of

    yo

    contribut ions, especial ly

    contributing

    to

    my

    fr iend Brian,

    l

    apologize,

    therefore

    I now

    ha$ten to

    thank you for

    any/,11.

    You were welcomed i n to

    my

    home, introduced

    to my family; wit

    clear understandings and agreements. From the

    very

    fir&t day

    you

    were

    ask

    not

    to

    vidQO or

    audio

    because

    of

    my speech,

    you

    persisted,

    my

    agreeing

    for

    audio

    with understanding

    you get

    me a

    copy of uneoited audio for my having t ranscribed to see

    •xactly what

    I

    had aaid,

    I

    have yet to get th is per

    our agree·.

    f&nt,

    before

    you

    le f t town. You used my Video photo af te r be-

    ng

    aak no t to

    video on more than

    one

    time.

    Mr.

    Carroll ou

    1if

    as_since our f i r s t m t Y

    .ETTEJfs.

    DO(:JJMF.N l l l.

    Rf

    ~~jM~o~T~:,:t l-~r~f d

    ~o

    ~Ice

    nubl ic

    p D 1 , r

    l l ~ U T Y

    uT.1,.-n.,_

    -

    7

    f M-/V,~1, l7 5*

    ~·_ I.JjJA.

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    41/55

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    42/55

    DESTROY AFTER RECEIPT

    A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR HAS NOW BEEN APPOINTED. FRIEND HAPPY AS

    SELECTfD PROSECUTOR

    HAS INTENSE

    LASER VISION

    AND

    HAS TAKEN

    DOWN

    D.A. SANDJUDGES.

    (keep this

    quiet

    for now)

    Prosecutor ls on a plane

    now

    Friend

    w nts

    permission

    to

    give him your

    contact

    information

    for

    him

    ta

    meet

    with

    you as Friend did

    not

    give

    out your

    name.

    Most likely your residence is under heavy surveillance. Afraid papers may

    b a

    compromised in your

    location

    and

    it

    is

    not safe to

    ha11e

    picked up now.

    Fax

    all

    necessary papers to me for

    safe

    keeping.

    Let

    me know if the fax needs to run all

    night as I Sive you permission

    to

    do so; I will

    move

    fa) machine

    out

    of bedroom

    if

    needed for special project.

    Much Jovel

    YOU

    DID IT

    The Calvary is riding inl

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    43/55

     

    --  

    t4D , -

    2

    15 i)C:a GB];i: l ~a·~·nt °n l l ID~Wo

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    44/55

    November 23, 2015

    Mr.

    John Carroll

    The

    Henry county

    Report

    Post

    Office

    Box

    2

    Abbeville,

    Alabama 36310

    Re: Message Faxed

    J1/23/2015@

    3:57 p.m. From [914] 939-1476

    Pursuant to

    your

    faxed

    message

    dated 11/19/2015 @3:38

    p.m. (via]

    :from

    [914] 939-1476

    titled specifically, Message

    directly from Jin

    response

    to your message to him

    oflast

    _ ... Page one

    o

    one paragraph two,

    That

    I

    am

    fully capable

    o

    returning and beating

    his

    elderly ass ''

    Please, be re•adviscd;

    refer to my

    responding

    said fax

    dated

    11/19/2015@ 5:10

    p.m.

    regarding

    my

    properties

    involving any/all

    letters, docwnents, or

    forms

    for

    your further

    use

    and/or

    public

    referrals too;

    since date o same

    fax,

    11/19/2015.

    you

    have

    not

    had, nor

    do

    you

    now

    have,

    or will be authorized

    for public

    and/or private use thereof; furthennore,

    you are respectfully requested o [via {914} 939-1476]

    to

    adhere to instructions per this

    fax dated, l l/23/2015i that

    you

    have

    not

    been, are

    not

    now, not n :futW e,

    authorized

    to

    make

    public, and/or duplicate

    for

    private

    gain

    these {my various titled personal

    documents.

    Otherwise,

    best

    wishes in

    your

    future

    pursuits

    for

    justice.

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    45/55

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    46/55

    Case 1:16-cv-00229-MHT-SRW Document 4 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 1

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

    MIDDLE

    DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

    JON

    B.

    CARROLL

    P l a i n t i f f

    v .

    JOHN

    WHITE e t a l .

    Defendants .

    ORDER

    CIVIL ACTION NO.

    1:16cv229-MHT

    For

    good

    cause shown

    t i s ORDERED

    t h a t

    pursuant

    to

    28 U.S.C. §

    636

    t h i s case i s

    r e f e r r e d t o

    the United

    Sta tes Magis t ra te

    Judge

    fo r cons idera t ion

    and

    d ispos i t ion o r recommendation on

    a l l p r e t r i a l

    mat te rs

    as may be appropr ia te .

    DONE t h i s the 6th day of Apr i l 2016.

    / s / Myron H. Thompson

    UNITED STA