debunking jon carroll

Download Debunking Jon Carroll

Post on 06-Jul-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    1/55

    Re; CV16-00046JC

    To:

    The Unit.cd

    States Attorney and/or

    The Most Senior

    Assistant

    U.S.

    Attorney

    700 Stewart

    Street,

    Suite

    5220

    Seattle, Washington

    98101-1271

    Fax (206] 553-0882

    From: Wylde D.

    Williams,

    Jr.

    2003

    Glasgow Drive

    Dothan, Alabama 36301

    HAND DELIVERED

    MSGR

    :w

    REC D BY

    SB

    COPY RECEIVED

    JAN

    2 6 2 16

    Ti ME: Q~?

    UNITED

    STATES

    ATTORNEY

    Seattle, WA

    _FILED NTERED

    ODGED

    ECEIVED

    JAN

    27 2 16

    DJ

    . AT SEATTLE

    CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT

    ~STERN DISTRICT

    OF

    WASHINGTON

    DEPUTY

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    2/55

    January

    23rd,

    2016

    Federal Clerk's Office {Att: Johanna}

    Gus

    J.

    Solomon

    Federal Court House

    700 Stewart Street,

    Suite

    #2310

    Seattle, Washington

    98101

    _FILED _ENTERED

    _LODGED

    _RECEIVED

    JAN 27

    2 16

    J

    U.S.

    Attomey9s

    Office**

    AT SEATTLE

    CLERK U S DISTRICT COURT

    WESTERN

    DISTRICT OF W SHINGTONTY

    Y DEPU

    700 Stewart

    Street, Suite

    #5220

    Seattle, Washington

    98101-1271

    Fax # [206J 553-0882*

    Federal Bureau of Investigation

    l

    lJO

    3rd Avenue

    Seattle, Washington

    98101-2904

    .

    Dear

    Federal Officers of the Court and Investigating Authorities:

    There currently exist pending before

    this

    Honorable District Court for the

    United

    States'

    9tJ

    Circuit, Seattle,

    Washington

    a civil action, case number identified as CVI6-

    00046JC. The heading; for which this case action

    is

    styled under

    has

    been

    recorded in the

    Federal Clerk's Office

    as

    a Complaint For Declaratory Judgment by individual

    Jon

    C.

    Carroll; identifying himself

    as

    a legal resident

    o

    said county and state

    in

    seeking

    this

    Honorable Court's favorable

    ruling

    for bringing forth

    before

    a jury for determination.

    At issue, for the purpose of his official letter

    is the

    Plaintiff's

    access

    to this court's

    jurisdiction, founded

    on

    fact based supporting facts and evidences. This official letter in

    itselfwill not represent the validity in total the weighty merits required being brought

    forth before

    this Honorable

    Court,

    at some later date realizing the Plaintiff's filing

    had been disingenuous-and

    misleading;

    on the

    surface,

    the court had no reason to know,

    could not have known,

    that the

    Plaintiff

    while

    listing his photojournalism

    experiences and

    accomplishments, giving the appearances o international connections, has obvious

    chosen to delete

    from

    making known before

    this

    Honorable Court that at same time

    he is

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    3/55

    actively engaged in his personally self owned-operating publishing blog located and

    licensed

    in

    supposedly

    Henry

    CoW1ty

    Alabama

    with a Abbeville, Alabama Post

    Office

    Box

    No.

    This personal information never

    appears anywhere

    within the content o plaintiff s

    complaint before this Honorable Court

    whereas first

    raising concems/doubts validity

    for

    this Honorable Court s jurisdiction; secondly because

    plaintiff

    left

    suspfoiously

    from

    this Alabama

    area latter 2015

    to whereabouts unknown;

    later

    was

    understood

    headed for

    Canada to

    supposedly avoid

    being served legal

    docwnents

    that

    resulted

    from Civil

    actions

    filed. Standing

    is qualified

    as

    result

    o

    plaintiff s decision to deliberately

    name

    within the filing o this civil

    action

    author o his letter by name

    but

    far more troubling

    the fact that this filing

    has

    intentionally Jed

    this

    Honorable Court

    to

    believe that all within

    documents nanatives~ descriptions, listings, examples and displays have been lawfully

    and

    legally

    obtained which in fact is not correct, and furthennore not

    true;

    giving any

    average

    minded

    person

    the

    impression for

    purposeful

    deceiving and deceptions o his

    Honorable Court. While

    the author

    o his

    letter writes

    on]y in his

    sole behalf

    and his

    alone;

    although via a telephone conversation recently another

    individua1

    listed in this

    plaintiff s

    case filing before this Honorable Court can

    be identified as

    one

    Ms.

    Jacque

    Bargoon advising o her too having

    had

    docwnents removed

    by

    p]aintiff; others, this

    author

    having

    no

    knowledge of.

    As

    the authoro this letter Ihave only within p st few days learned ofthis

    plaintiffs

    filing o his

    civil action s

    information from

    a

    local Alabama

    source;

    why,

    you

    may

    ask is any o his

    filing a concern

    o

    mine? I h d never

    known

    of never heard

    o

    the plaintiff before

    late swnmer

    2015;

    and

    then

    only

    through

    a

    friend who

    had

    heard

  • 8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

    4/55

    about him through his daily/weekly local/area bloggings nd

    thought

    I may want to call

    on him for

    a

    meeting to discuss

    the possibilities o helping me

    with

    a book I h d written.

    He was

    told

    over the phone

    before

    our fitst one on one meeting that I

    h d

    been fallen by a

    disabling

    sttoke, and

    that all my materials

    for

    my book h d been dropped

    over

    time

    and

    that I needed help organizing nd editing. He advised me that he was sure that he could

    help,

    and

    where

    he couldn t he

    knew

    enough

    people

    that

    could.

    Talking back

    and

    forth

    over

    telephone a few

    times,

    I was lead to believe I could

    trust

    him especially

    since never

    having

    met him

    before,

    and

    continuously reminding

    him

    o

    m

    y

    having

    h d

    a stroke

    and

    confined

    to

    home,

    and

    y wife s worry for my continued involvements. From

    those

    first

    few telephone conversations

    laid ground

    work

    for

    first afternoon

    meeting at my

    residence.

    This

    ftrst

    meeting,

    with

    a friend who he

    had

    brought

    with

    him,

    we

    talked on

    my front

    porch for about 5 minutes, give or take. Originally wanting to audio nd video me, I told

    the

    plaintiff

    from the st rt

    that

    making

    of

    ny audio

    or video was not

    going

    to

    be

    allowed

    or authorized. Plus to reinsure my position

    because

    ofmy stroke,

    health

    problems with

    short~term memory lost

    at

    72 years

    old,

    h rd

    of

    hearing,

    that

    he

    was not authorized

    to

    audio Ol video; anything done without my expressed

    and

    written in advance authority

    given him

    would be a violation of my trust,

    to

    which in every visit, then, and theteafter he

    agreed

    to

    honol to the fullest; I

    believe

    all total visits

    to

    my

    residence

    there

    were four.

    His actions at. subsequently resulting

    from

    plaintiff having been at my

    residence

    late swnmer 2015 is

    now

    the bedrock

    qualifying

    sound

    statements

    evidences

    addressed

    within

    this official

    lettel . First and

    foremost

    I

    write

    not for

    me

    first as an individual, but

    to the

    greater contrary; the protection

    o

    other s.

    friends

    or

    not

    o

    mine.

    rights

    to

    lesal

    and

    lawful opportunities

    to benefit

    from my

    years

    of efforts

    to make

    their stories known

    since

  • 8/18/2019 Deb