debunking jon carroll

8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

1/55

Re; CV16-00046JC

To:

The Unit.cd

States Attorney and/or

The Most Senior

Assistant

U.S.

Attorney

700 Stewart

Street,

Suite

5220

Seattle, Washington

98101-1271

Fax (206] 553-0882

From: Wylde D.

Williams,

Jr.

2003

Glasgow Drive

Dothan, Alabama 36301

HAND DELIVERED

MSGR

:w

REC D BY

SB

COPY RECEIVED

JAN

2 6 2 16

Ti ME: Q~?

UNITED

STATES

ATTORNEY

Seattle, WA

_FILED NTERED

ODGED

ECEIVED

JAN

27 2 16

DJ

. AT SEATTLE

CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT

~STERN DISTRICT

OF

WASHINGTON

DEPUTY

8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

2/55

January

23rd,

2016

Federal Clerk's Office {Att: Johanna}

Gus

J.

Solomon

Federal Court House

700 Stewart Street,

Suite

#2310

Seattle, Washington

98101

_FILED _ENTERED

_LODGED

_RECEIVED

JAN 27

2 16

J

U.S.

Attomey9s

Office**

AT SEATTLE

CLERK U S DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN

DISTRICT OF W SHINGTONTY

Y DEPU

700 Stewart

Street, Suite

#5220

Seattle, Washington

98101-1271

Fax # [206J 553-0882*

Federal Bureau of Investigation

l

lJO

3rd Avenue

Seattle, Washington

98101-2904

.

Dear

Federal Officers of the Court and Investigating Authorities:

There currently exist pending before

this

Honorable District Court for the

United

States'

9tJ

Circuit, Seattle,

Washington

a civil action, case number identified as CVI6-

00046JC. The heading; for which this case action

is

styled under

has

been

recorded in the

Federal Clerk's Office

as

a Complaint For Declaratory Judgment by individual

Jon

C.

Carroll; identifying himself

as

a legal resident

o

said county and state

in

seeking

this

Honorable Court's favorable

ruling

for bringing forth

before

a jury for determination.

At issue, for the purpose of his official letter

is the

Plaintiff's

access

to this court's

jurisdiction, founded

on

fact based supporting facts and evidences. This official letter in

itselfwill not represent the validity in total the weighty merits required being brought

forth before

this Honorable

Court,

at some later date realizing the Plaintiff's filing

had been disingenuous-and

misleading;

on the

surface,

the court had no reason to know,

could not have known,

that the

Plaintiff

while

listing his photojournalism

experiences and

accomplishments, giving the appearances o international connections, has obvious

chosen to delete

from

making known before

this

Honorable Court that at same time

he is

8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

3/55

actively engaged in his personally self owned-operating publishing blog located and

licensed

in

supposedly

Henry

CoW1ty

Alabama

with a Abbeville, Alabama Post

Office

Box

No.

This personal information never

appears anywhere

within the content o plaintiff s

complaint before this Honorable Court

whereas first

raising concems/doubts validity

for

this Honorable Court s jurisdiction; secondly because

plaintiff

left

suspfoiously

from

this Alabama

area latter 2015

to whereabouts unknown;

later

was

understood

headed for

Canada to

supposedly avoid

being served legal

docwnents

that

resulted

from Civil

actions

filed. Standing

is qualified

as

result

o

plaintiff s decision to deliberately

name

within the filing o this civil

action

author o his letter by name

but

far more troubling

the fact that this filing

has

intentionally Jed

this

Honorable Court

to

believe that all within

documents nanatives~ descriptions, listings, examples and displays have been lawfully

and

legally

obtained which in fact is not correct, and furthennore not

true;

giving any

average

minded

person

the

impression for

purposeful

deceiving and deceptions o his

Honorable Court. While

the author

o his

letter writes

on]y in his

sole behalf

and his

alone;

although via a telephone conversation recently another

individua1

listed in this

plaintiff s

case filing before this Honorable Court can

be identified as

one

Ms.

Jacque

Bargoon advising o her too having

had

docwnents removed

by

p]aintiff; others, this

author

having

no

knowledge of.

As

the authoro this letter Ihave only within p st few days learned ofthis

plaintiffs

filing o his

civil action s

information from

a

local Alabama

source;

why,

you

may

ask is any o his

filing a concern

o

mine? I h d never

known

of never heard

o

the plaintiff before

late swnmer

2015;

and

then

only

through

a

friend who

had

heard

8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll

4/55

about him through his daily/weekly local/area bloggings nd

thought

I may want to call

on him for

a

meeting to discuss

the possibilities o helping me

with

a book I h d written.

He was

told

over the phone

before

our fitst one on one meeting that I

h d

been fallen by a

disabling

sttoke, and

that all my materials

for

my book h d been dropped

over

time

and

that I needed help organizing nd editing. He advised me that he was sure that he could

help,

and

where

he couldn t he

knew

enough

people

that

could.

Talking back

and

forth

over

telephone a few

times,

I was lead to believe I could

trust

him especially

since never

having

met him

before,

and

continuously reminding

him

o

m

y

having

h d

a stroke

and

confined

to

home,

and

y wife s worry for my continued involvements. From

those

first

few telephone conversations

laid ground

work

for

first afternoon

meeting at my

residence.

This

ftrst

meeting,

with

a friend who he

had

brought

with

him,

we

talked on

my front

porch for about 5 minutes, give or take. Originally wanting to audio nd video me, I told

the

plaintiff

from the st rt

that

making

of

ny audio

or video was not

going

to

be

allowed

or authorized. Plus to reinsure my position

because

ofmy stroke,

health

problems with

short~term memory lost

at

72 years

old,

h rd

of

hearing,

that

he

was not authorized

to

audio Ol video; anything done without my expressed

and

written in advance authority

given him

would be a violation of my trust,

to

which in every visit, then, and theteafter he

agreed

to

honol to the fullest; I

believe

all total visits

to

my

residence

there

were four.

His actions at. subsequently resulting

from

plaintiff having been at my

residence

late swnmer 2015 is

now

the bedrock

qualifying

sound

statements

evidences

addressed

within

this official

lettel . First and

foremost

I

write

not for

me

first as an individual, but

to the

greater contrary; the protection

o

other s.

friends

or

not

o

mine.

rights

to

lesal

and

lawful opportunities

to benefit

from my

years

of efforts

to make

their stories known

since

8/18/2019 Deb