debunking jon carroll
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
1/55
Re; CV16-00046JC
To:
The Unit.cd
States Attorney and/or
The Most Senior
Assistant
U.S.
Attorney
700 Stewart
Street,
Suite
5220
Seattle, Washington
98101-1271
Fax (206] 553-0882
From: Wylde D.
Williams,
Jr.
2003
Glasgow Drive
Dothan, Alabama 36301
HAND DELIVERED
MSGR
:w
REC D BY
SB
COPY RECEIVED
JAN
2 6 2 16
Ti ME: Q~?
UNITED
STATES
ATTORNEY
Seattle, WA
_FILED NTERED
ODGED
ECEIVED
JAN
27 2 16
DJ
. AT SEATTLE
CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT
~STERN DISTRICT
OF
WASHINGTON
DEPUTY
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
2/55
January
23rd,
2016
Federal Clerk's Office {Att: Johanna}
Gus
J.
Solomon
Federal Court House
700 Stewart Street,
Suite
#2310
Seattle, Washington
98101
_FILED _ENTERED
_LODGED
_RECEIVED
JAN 27
2 16
J
U.S.
Attomey9s
Office**
AT SEATTLE
CLERK U S DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN
DISTRICT OF W SHINGTONTY
Y DEPU
700 Stewart
Street, Suite
#5220
Seattle, Washington
98101-1271
Fax # [206J 553-0882*
Federal Bureau of Investigation
l
lJO
3rd Avenue
Seattle, Washington
98101-2904
.
Dear
Federal Officers of the Court and Investigating Authorities:
There currently exist pending before
this
Honorable District Court for the
United
States'
9tJ
Circuit, Seattle,
Washington
a civil action, case number identified as CVI6-
00046JC. The heading; for which this case action
is
styled under
has
been
recorded in the
Federal Clerk's Office
as
a Complaint For Declaratory Judgment by individual
Jon
C.
Carroll; identifying himself
as
a legal resident
o
said county and state
in
seeking
this
Honorable Court's favorable
ruling
for bringing forth
before
a jury for determination.
At issue, for the purpose of his official letter
is the
Plaintiff's
access
to this court's
jurisdiction, founded
on
fact based supporting facts and evidences. This official letter in
itselfwill not represent the validity in total the weighty merits required being brought
forth before
this Honorable
Court,
at some later date realizing the Plaintiff's filing
had been disingenuous-and
misleading;
on the
surface,
the court had no reason to know,
could not have known,
that the
Plaintiff
while
listing his photojournalism
experiences and
accomplishments, giving the appearances o international connections, has obvious
chosen to delete
from
making known before
this
Honorable Court that at same time
he is
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
3/55
actively engaged in his personally self owned-operating publishing blog located and
licensed
in
supposedly
Henry
CoW1ty
Alabama
with a Abbeville, Alabama Post
Office
Box
No.
This personal information never
appears anywhere
within the content o plaintiff s
complaint before this Honorable Court
whereas first
raising concems/doubts validity
for
this Honorable Court s jurisdiction; secondly because
plaintiff
left
suspfoiously
from
this Alabama
area latter 2015
to whereabouts unknown;
later
was
understood
headed for
Canada to
supposedly avoid
being served legal
docwnents
that
resulted
from Civil
actions
filed. Standing
is qualified
as
result
o
plaintiff s decision to deliberately
name
within the filing o this civil
action
author o his letter by name
but
far more troubling
the fact that this filing
has
intentionally Jed
this
Honorable Court
to
believe that all within
documents nanatives~ descriptions, listings, examples and displays have been lawfully
and
legally
obtained which in fact is not correct, and furthennore not
true;
giving any
average
minded
person
the
impression for
purposeful
deceiving and deceptions o his
Honorable Court. While
the author
o his
letter writes
on]y in his
sole behalf
and his
alone;
although via a telephone conversation recently another
individua1
listed in this
plaintiff s
case filing before this Honorable Court can
be identified as
one
Ms.
Jacque
Bargoon advising o her too having
had
docwnents removed
by
p]aintiff; others, this
author
having
no
knowledge of.
As
the authoro this letter Ihave only within p st few days learned ofthis
plaintiffs
filing o his
civil action s
information from
a
local Alabama
source;
why,
you
may
ask is any o his
filing a concern
o
mine? I h d never
known
of never heard
o
the plaintiff before
late swnmer
2015;
and
then
only
through
a
friend who
had
heard
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
4/55
about him through his daily/weekly local/area bloggings nd
thought
I may want to call
on him for
a
meeting to discuss
the possibilities o helping me
with
a book I h d written.
He was
told
over the phone
before
our fitst one on one meeting that I
h d
been fallen by a
disabling
sttoke, and
that all my materials
for
my book h d been dropped
over
time
and
that I needed help organizing nd editing. He advised me that he was sure that he could
help,
and
where
he couldn t he
knew
enough
people
that
could.
Talking back
and
forth
over
telephone a few
times,
I was lead to believe I could
trust
him especially
since never
having
met him
before,
and
continuously reminding
him
o
m
y
having
h d
a stroke
and
confined
to
home,
and
y wife s worry for my continued involvements. From
those
first
few telephone conversations
laid ground
work
for
first afternoon
meeting at my
residence.
This
ftrst
meeting,
with
a friend who he
had
brought
with
him,
we
talked on
my front
porch for about 5 minutes, give or take. Originally wanting to audio nd video me, I told
the
plaintiff
from the st rt
that
making
of
ny audio
or video was not
going
to
be
allowed
or authorized. Plus to reinsure my position
because
ofmy stroke,
health
problems with
short~term memory lost
at
72 years
old,
h rd
of
hearing,
that
he
was not authorized
to
audio Ol video; anything done without my expressed
and
written in advance authority
given him
would be a violation of my trust,
to
which in every visit, then, and theteafter he
agreed
to
honol to the fullest; I
believe
all total visits
to
my
residence
there
were four.
His actions at. subsequently resulting
from
plaintiff having been at my
residence
late swnmer 2015 is
now
the bedrock
qualifying
sound
statements
evidences
addressed
within
this official
lettel . First and
foremost
I
write
not for
me
first as an individual, but
to the
greater contrary; the protection
o
other s.
friends
or
not
o
mine.
rights
to
lesal
and
lawful opportunities
to benefit
from my
years
of efforts
to make
their stories known
since
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
5/55
before
2002,
and not
to be profited
off
o
after their
having
suffered, endured years
o
tragedies,
and
traumatizing emotional depressions resulting
from
their families suffering
from
murders, beatings, imprisonments,
and
the
list
goes on.
But, the
anchor
o al] the
accumulations o years
o
infonnation, interviews.
evidences gathered
by
not
onJy
myself,
but
my friend and
attorney
the Late nd
Honorable Brian W. Dowling beginning Swnmer, June 1997, paralleling FBI
tri-states
gambling raids; eventually involving both ofus in litigations tied to illegal drugs,
government corruptions, involving
upwards to
7,000,000.00 criminally embezzled
from
local
business; additionally important would come
to
cause to the resurfacing o unsolved
assassination
o [black] Dothan
Police Narcotics Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson,
from
January
31
1978, by 2002 before fallen by
stroke,
but
after
Brian
being
found
mUl dered
along side roadway ditch,
and both
our
mend and
attorney, parHime municipal
judge
the
later
and
Honorable
Jennifer Atwell having
been found
dead
in
bed in
less than
65 holll S
after
having
ordered the issuance
for me o 30 subpoenas
that would
have
a
direct bearing on the exposing continued cover
up
involving Mr. Dowling•s murder
too.
Within same
month I
h d my
stroke August
2002.
The litigation between the plaintiffand defendants
are
for their resolving and not o
this author's concern;
but it
is
o
most panunount and urgent
that
this Honorable Court
does move
forthwith denying plaintiff, for
now and
evermore any/all his
agents/associates/partners present or
future use
in the narrative, audio, or video
communications'
forms
any referred to, described, listed, or displayed examples obtained
from the residence, for
any
plaintiff's purpose[s], o his official letter's author.
While true,
and
I realize, this letter
may
not be
the
proper legal document vehicle
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
6/55
for any
individual
to become a party
to
this civil case action, it is
the
well planned
intention
o
same
to
participate
as
a
friend
o
the
court via Americus curiae in
an
effort
contributing to the protecting o his Court's Honor, Esteem, Integrity, and Public Trust;
defined within the U.S. Code Title 18, o Part I, o Chapter 101,
for
Section 2071:
CONCEALMENT, Removal, Mutilation generally , ref62
Stat.
795 June 25
1948
2071
a); Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals,removes, mutilates, obliterates,
or destroys, or attempts to o so, or with intent to do so .........filed with
any
clerk andlot
officer
o
court
o
he
United States ........
Therefore qualifying, in
fact the compelling o
both
the
Seattle's 9
U.S.
Circuit's
U.S. Attorney's Office and Federal Bureau oflnvestigationjurisdictlons to intervene into
plaintiffs
motivation
for
singling
out this particular court, in lieu o court within
plaintiff's longtime established residence jurisdiction;
and
too, plaintiff's continuous day
to day operations o business commonly known to public as The Henry County
Reporter , the U.S. 11 ll
Circuit
Atlanta, Georgia;
via
U.S. District Cgurt
for
the Middle
District o Alabama loeated
in
Mont_gomer_y.
Alabama
only less
than
l00 miles away
from identified and/or implied named sources referred to in plaintiff's filing.
he plaintiffhas sought out
the
U.S. Court located
the
greatest distance
from
making convenient
and
accessible the very parties plaintiff
so
freely names and from
whom claimed any and all infonnation and document copies provided plaintifffor
publishing his articles
were so readily. freely,
and never without restriction provided him
thus
allowing plaintiff to have appeared before this Honorable Court without haYing ever
known of accwnulations o misrepresentations brought before thi:, Honorable Court via
this plaintiff's
civil
action's
filing, and the
W1derlying
ulterior
motives
believed for
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
7/55
··
having done so
regarding those
others also,
liken
to same
as
author
of
his official
letter.
In conclusion, the plaintiff not only makes known
to
this Honorable
Court
his
established
residence, furthermore
his
continuing
day to day ongoing blogging business;
but
fails to make
known
to
this
Honorable Court
that during plaintiff's second visit to
author
of
his official letter's residence that plaintiffdid
in
fact, without this author's first
knowledge
of,
advance
approval of, or
even in
the aftermath a subsequent awareness of
plaintiff having
made
secretly a clandestine video photo of author's person at his
residence.
This
author
only
learning of
how
been secretly violated of
his
trust
placed
in
plaintiff
via
neighbors co-workers
seeing
photo of
author
of internet and telling family
members. Plaintiffwhen
confronted,
agreeing to stop, not to blog audio/video of
his
author,
his private properties ever again
wou1d soon be
found out to be again
untrustworthy.
While all
during these
same
times this plaintiffwas continuously seeking
from, to get any and all physical
properties
he
could
access.
But
after
first
incident with
photo,
having
been the third meeting,
y
the forth
was
obvious
to
plaintiff
that
no
longer
cou1d be anticipated any further opportunities gain
access
to file copies for audio/video.
The last communication that this author
had from
plaintiff after refusing to discuss,
to
agree to
give RT an interview, after learning
RT
was Russia
Today ;
and refusing to
again and again provide further documents, sent message~
M ome
back
down
(supposedly from
Canada) there and be t
his elderly
ass. Please, assist in forwarding
copies to clerk's office
and
bW Cau's office since
they
are without fax. Thanking you in
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
8/55
n
the United States District Court for the U.S.
9°
Circuit
Western District o
Jon
B.
Carroll, Plaintiff
Vs.
John
White
Carlton
..Bubba
Ott
Mike Magiino
Andy
Hughes
Tony
Spivey
Eddie Henderson
Rex Tipton
Keith Cauthen
Steve
Parrish,
Defendants
Washington at Seattle
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
CIVIL
ACTION
CASE
NO.
#CVJ6-00046JC
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment
ury Trial
Demanded
Civil
Action Case
#CV16-00046JC
Judgment filed
in
th
Circuit for
the United
States
INTRODUCTION
COMES
now the
petitioner by and
through
self representation before
this
Honorable
Court,
not in
seeking
material and/or monetary
damages
via
this court's
findings;
but whose
one and
only
purpose
is not self
centered
and/or
driven
but
rather to
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
9/55
the
contrary
as
previous years
history
will support; privately
and publicly for those,
friends of
mine,
or either those having never been
known
to
me
before;
for
reasons, the
advocating
o
their equal rights, protections,
and
due processes, originally beaiMing
1997. By
1999
having joined
small local
activist
group,
C.L.A.R.A. [Citizens
for Legal
Accountability and
Refol lll
in
Alabama],
who
likewise
had same
concerns
as
petitioner,
becoming
even
more
engaged within
an even
smaller core of group
which
included about
10/12
individuals: A retired
school
teacher, a
medical
doctor,
two
attorneys, paralegal,
two
small businessmen, a
farmer,
a retired serviceman, a county secretary, a college
student, and a waitress.
THE
petitioner
now moves
this
Honorable
Court to
deny
any/all request
for
this
court's ruling
in
part or
whole
involving this plaintifrs Complaint
for
Declaratory
Judgment. Petitioner
s merits
in these
matters before this court are sound and qualified.
Namely, plaintiff
does not
list
in his
complaint that
he
is owner-operator of his business
The
Henry
County
Report'\ also affixed
atop
o
posted
articles plaintiff's personal photo,
located
in
Abbeville, Alabama with a
post
office box address. Plaintiff
has
come before
this
court in
such a disingenuous narrative presentation,
now has
caused or caused
to be
caused of this Honorable Court
to be under
duty and obligation to demand o plaintiff to
be forthcoming
with all, total,
and complete facts, and
truths plaintiff references
to as
either indirectly or directly applies to this petitioner during few weeks latter 2015,
which
at no time was
told verbally, or
given
in
writing
to post
anything plaintiff
had
access
to
under petitioner's true beliefs and understandings were for the purposes in aiding
in
organizing
and
book editing of
past
years experiences, before having
been
faUen
by
disabling
stroke and
left handicapped, restricted
to residence. he
petitioner knows
that
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
10/55
plaintiff has without authority or authorization
made
taken, and/or removed physical
items
and/or audio/videos
made
in secret without petitioner's knowledge
at
time. These
matters before this Honorable Court are
more far reaching
and
shouJd
strive to avoid
being made a fool''. The plaintiff has sought personal exposures, nd
now thru
this filing
plans
for
pursuing personal material and monetary
gains on
the backs of others, without
their knowledge hideous pains. Claiming before multiple natiooal media sources that
plaintiff
had
hundreds of documents commands
of
this court to challenge plaintiffas
to
validity
and
factuality
of
said statement[s] by publicly presenting before this Honorable
Court,
and
from whom individually named persons, did plaintiff acquire and how so
much
of
others personal affaits.
The plaintiff dishonors those
he
so causally refers to, namely my
friend and.former third shiftfellow police office assassinated Dothan Police Narcotics
Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson my longtime friend and attorney
the late
and
Honorable Attorney Brian W Dowling additionally others such as Sergeant Jackson's
lead investigator, Homicide
Detective Sergeant Harold Locke found suspiciously
killed
result of traffic accident, seventeen year old teenage senior high school girl,
Ms.
Tracie
Hawlett friend of Ms. JB. Beasley both found murdered execution style Ozark,
Alabama
Ms.
Tracie Howlett having been
the
first born daughter,
ofmy
police academy
roommate Dothan Police Patrol Corporal Robert
Hawlett
found
suspiciously drown and
but not limited to the
late
and
Honorable Jennifer
Atwell found suspiciously dead in less
than seventy-two hours after having ordered the issuance of hirty subpoenas tied to the
suspicious hit and rim homi(;ide
of
attorney Brian Dowling and or
shptgun
assaJ Yl>tarion o Oothan Police ffi R .
zcer ober/ Jack.son. ttr
o• • :~- '
,. -•
._ U M . , ..,,...Ji.J.r ij>
1i-..'J.I l u u n } S
I Ct:effeCI.
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
11/55
I.
to by name or either identities implied arc deserving, commanding,
of
his court's
compassion and protection from
profiteering.
lfthe plaintiff desires to make a public
documentary involving those unknown to him, until coming to petitioner's residence, the
petitioner
moves
the Honorable Court
to
order plaintiff to return to his home city/county
of licensed business
and do
so
ethically
and
honorably. This
petition t h
no vested
interest i l
the participation
or ougome
in this case
action's
decision
between
plaintiff
and/or defendants, for whatever
their litigations;
it.
s each of
theirs, the law
enforcement
authorities and this
Honorable
to resolve.
PURSUANT to United States Court Federal
Rules
of Civil Procedures, specifically
Rule 24, Intervention, for purposes of petitioning this honorable court the qualified
filing of Americus curiae, ''friend
of
he court, someone
who is
not a
p rty
to a case and
offers infonnation that be rs on a case, but who has not
been
solicited by any of
he
parties to assist
the court,
a way to introduce concerns ensuring that the possibility broad
legal
efforts
of
a court decision
will
not depend solely on
the
parties directly
involved ;
whose
sole reasons designed
to
make known before
this
honorable court, true
fact based
information/events otherwise will never be
made
known of before this court involving
the
above styled
recorded case number CVJ6-00046JC.
Puckett vs. Cox: [1972]
456f 2d 233;
It
was
held
that
a prose complaint
requires
a
less stringent reading
than one
drafted by a lawyer,
per
Ju.srice Black in Conley
vs.
Gibson.
WHEREBY>
comes
now
the petitioner, Wykle D. Williams, Jr., at age of seventy-
two
years, a stroke disabled
legal
resident of
Dothan,
Alabama by
nd
through self
representation, prose, and with utmost respect beseech of his Honorable Court to move
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
12/55
forthwith
in
the
ordering
o
plaintiff
o be
publicly
forthcoming thru oral/written
admissions provided for
within
Federal Rules o
Civil Procedures,
outlined in Rule
36,
Request
for Admission''; before
this
cowt
him
having had at sometime
since 2015 with
aforethought[s] premeditated
and subsequent
intentional planning[s] motivated within
his
person
to achieve plaintiff's own self
serving
personal material
and monetary
gains
as
a
dil ect and
specific result thereof having
aequired from
petitioner
petitioner's
personally
owned/stored
documents/papers/photos/materials/etc.
JENKINS vs. McKEffHEN: [1959) 395
U.S. 411,
421: Prose pleadings are to be
considered
without regard to
technically, pro
se
litigants' pleadings are
not to
be held to
same high
standards
o
erfection as
lawyers.·•
STANDING:
Petitioner's standing in
these
matters
before the
court are qualified
and sound. Petitioner's
issues before this court
do not
totally rest
with
either
the
plaintiff
or defendants,
for
their litigations
are
for their
own
settling. Petitioner's on
the
contrary
is
different because of plaintiff's narrative[s]
and
references
made
directly
and
specifically
involving
petitioner which on the legal merits
have not beeri
presented before this court in
a
manner
consistent with
honor, integrity, ethics,
and
compassion when using for
journalism props others
trust.
This honorable
COW t is
duty bound,
has an obHgation to
order, demand
of
plaintiff that he
publicly admit wrongful/iUegal
t.aking of
petitioner s
personal properties; especially
any and
all in
any
unofficial/official capacities
tied to
the
shotgw:i assassination of
police
officer Robert Jackson,
or
any others whose
names/info
plaintiffdid acquire unknowingly from petitioner. Over this short period o
ime
2015
plainti ff did knowingly and personally engage
in
multiple violations
wel
defined within
the State o Alabama Criminal Codes 13A- sections, namely
Larceny , [larceny after
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
13/55
three
times
being
denied access
to
his
equal rights
filing
either and/or city/federal
incident/offense
reports. Letter
dated June 1999,
petitioner
to
AUSA Holmes
before
October
l 999
gambling trillls, still continuing to seek justice for son, to this date, denied
Likewise information and
evidences provided
too via attorney Brian Dowling
until
his
murder April
13
1
. 2000. Petitioner
moves
this Honorable Court, guided
by
its conscious
o
the law, not to
fail
those seen as weak, o easy prey. and who cannot speak aloud
for
themselves any longer, being made mockeries o by same who
claim
powers and
authorities promoting justice for all.·
WHETHER in part/whole; no one item or more th n one item[s at anytime was
ever released
to
plaintiff
in
any fonns/styles for
plaintiff's
journalism operational care,
custody,
or
controls, or any other
authorities
to function
in any
official capacity; plaintiff
was told time and time
g in
and again he
w s
not given pennission, never authoriud to
make audio or
video o
petitioner's person; yet in direct violation ofpedtioner's trust,
plaintiffdid
in
fact brazenly violate secretly petitioner's trUst nd confidence by posting
on his
blog pages
and photos believed by
petitioner to
have been secretly videoed;
and
furthermore plaintiffwas
without exception,
resetVation
told, more
than one time that
he
was
not authorized, whether
in audio/video t pe fonns never to
act
in secrecy involving
petitioner/personal properties. Petitioner moves this court to
order
involving pl intiff
he
public enforcing o Federal
Rules o_fCivil
Procedures,
Rule
#37, Failure to Make
Disclosure.s. or to
Cooptr(Jte
in Discovery
Sanctions''.
WHILE
at
all
times during plaintiff's movements
did
cause
petitioner
to become
trusting and taking plaintiff
into
petitioner's confidence. Plaintiff after having already
established origjnaJ contact
with petitioner somewhere
arowid about summer
2015
was
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
14/55
by that time fully
aware in detail about
petitioner s
having endured
a disabling
stroke,
acrually even
prior
to plaintiff s/petitioner s
first
meeting, which
had been
established for
one primary and particular purpose;
for
their discussion regarding plaintiff s assistance in
helping obtain
someone
traveling out-of-state
with
journalism editing backgrowid
qualifications, from Australia for petitioner to help edit p st twelve years of his attempts
to write a book,
only to
be denied due being handicapped and complicated becauseof
stroke s severities. Additionally plaintiff encouraged petitionerto continuously provide
fact-based documents that plaintiff s contacts with HBO
was
interested in doing amini
series docwnentary
about
isolated incidents/eventspetitioner
having
h d for decades,
recent yea.rs, a close/vested interest in; specifically the assassination offriend and fellow
law enforcement
Dothan
police officer
Robert
Jackson; none
of which
plaintiff
had
ever
been cognizantof previously nor could have ever been undennines plaintiff s narrative
in filing,
Complaint
for
Declaratory
Judgment, Federal Rules o
Civil Procedures, Rule
26,
A
duty to
disclose
general
provisions,
government discovery ; when involving
any
and all words, verbiages, punctuations, grammars, descriptions, mentioning, addressing,
referencing, and/or
in
any other styles or
fashions not herein
spelled out tied directly
to,
and/or indirectly to
the name
of
the
deceased State of
Alabama
[black aw Enforcement
Dothan
Police Narcotics Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson; or
his
widow
BiJlie
Jackson,
or son Robert Jackson, Jr., or daughter Yolanda Jackson; or in fact any other individual
who
by name
was
MOngfully
~uire
by
plaintiff unauthorized
by
petitioner. Likewise
as equally applicable
any
and
all
types, styles, and forms
of
petitioner s persona
physical
properties; but not to
be
overshadowed, occurring
at
any and all times, providing
originals of existing audio/video tapesmade of petitioner with accompanying audio/video
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
15/55
copies
attached avoiding future
violations
of petitioner s trust
and confidence.
AS result o direct
actions
taken by
plaintiff
during
plaintiff s approximate
three
visits
inside
petitioner s
residence operating
in
what can
now
only
be concluded as
intentional clandestine routine(s] under
guises/ruse
to, after having once
realized
the
value and accumulative infonnation~ take advantage o petitioner, due his
age
nd health
result
of disabling
stroke. At no time
plaintiff
ever
fulfilling
any promises/suggestions
him making available individual
unknown
to
petitioner
for
book editin i nor after having
believed
to have apparently got
all
infonnation plaintiff
could, no
further
mentioning o
HBO
productions.
LONG before ending
2015.
petitioner
learning ofhim being used in
plaintiffs
blog without ever any beforehand discussions.
advance
approvals; which
would
have
not been authorized
anyway,
plaintiff
was notified y U.S. Mail to his
Abbeville, Alabama address, also faxed messages, and
left
telephone messages regarding
petitioner
having discovered items
plaintiff
h d in his
possession,
had never returned.
Likewise came to surface in
plaintiff s
blog[s)
w s
petitioner s
photo and information,
none o which were pre-approved, when
plaintiffh d
been told since first meeting,
told
on
that
occasion,
afterwards
he w s not then ever authorized to audio
and/or
video for
public
domain petitioner s
personal properties.
TO further inflame
petitioner s
and
plaintiff s
straining several weeks old causal
relationship,just
prior ending 2015
a petitioner s
friend
came
to resjdence advising
of
plaintiff s additional
postings,
a
blatant violation
o
specific
instructions, further
breaching
of trust, beyond the pale; plaintiff
had left the
area
headed for
Canada still
refusing to return before leaving all items
taken from petitioner s
residence
after trust,
or
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
16/55
worst in violation o trust, rising to levc:l of heft. otherwise some of
what
plaintiffhas
posted
could not have
otherwise
come into
his possession.
WHEREFORE. Petitioner respectfully request that this
Honorable
Court
moves
orthwith in the issuing o an injunction for purpose of
ordering
plaintiffto make mute
either in
audio and/or video
forms, or
vi
written narratives o same items; likewise that
this
Honorable Court compel plaintiff
to
move without delay in presenting
before
this
court absolutely all
documents,
most specifically theil' origins,
their
owners, specific
itemized release authorizations, name o ndividual authorizing plaintiff's total care,
custody,
and controls secretly
forevermore,
dates
acquired,
and whatever other pertinent
requirements
this
Honorable Court deems necessary for satisfying this court involving
these issues; same as, and/or similar in nature as read within the content ofplaintifrs
complaint;
known examples, 16,
31, 76 [Q,U,R]
E,G,H,M,J,L, AND
77
M,R;
and
all
other styles, follllS,
examples
regardless their being in
audio,
video, photo, or
written/typed
evidences.
CONCLUSION
PETITIONER
seeks
not to intervene/interfere in
any
present or future planning by
plaintiffto
continue and further expand
his profession, photojournalism,
to
each
his own;
just don't take
advantage
o hose seen weak and vulnerable by gaining their trust; getting
access to private properties; when found
out
them
being
threaten, also having
encouraged
them t give personal
television interviews
on TV
station
without
ever telling
them
that
the 1elevision
station
RT is actually
Russia
Today after having many times given false
hopes o
government
interventions
via
formal investigations initiated by
U.S.
Attorney s
Office
Alabama
Atrorney
General s
Office Special
Prosecutor Matt Hart
CNN
just
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
17/55
·
-··---·---
.......
trust] l3A-8-1
with
accompanying subtitles: Definitions [01] Deception.
Jtems
A, B, C, D,
E,
and F;
[2
Deprive.
Items A, B, D, and E;
[06] Obtains.
Items A and B;
[07]
Obtains
or Exerts
Control, or Obtains
or
Exerts
Unauthorized
Control; [ IOJ Property. Tangible
or
Intangible,
the
Location[s] hich can be
Changed~
[12 Stolen. Obtained
by
Theft; [13]
Threat. Items A. F,
and
G;
[14] Value. {Petitioner's Personal Book's} Market Value.
N further support of petitioner's Standing, it is
of
weighty importance that thls
honorable
court
be made
cognizant
of
petitioner's
own son
having
been
selectively
targeted
for three
criminal
violations in Dothan.
Alabama, since
latest
1996
just
before
January 1997 FBI/city
police
surprise
multi-states
gambling raids never, not once has my
son been able to file
an
official criminal incident/offense report to generate
an FBI/CID
official investigation after
him having been
a premeditated target for
Criminal
Impersonation,
Alabama
Title
Code
I JA-9-18, subsequently
beaten
unmercifully;
Assault
and
Battery, Alabama Title Code l JA-06-22, having his front teeth knocked out
and facial bone fractures, eye socket floor fractures damages, blurring
visions. acute
lacerations, severe contusions,
and
significant abrasions; and
before
the gambling trial
due on October 1999
federal docket
in Montgomery, Alabama my son
was
approached
by
two bookies
charged in the gambling cases
and offered a 5,000.00
bribe, Influencing
a Witness, Alabama Title Code l3A-10·124,
t
influence his testimony; their beliefs him
having been a victim tied
to
their
illegal
gambling operations could be called as a
government witness especially since
him being CriminalJy
Impersonated at their
main
facility
wa s
apparent, although cases• Assistant U.S. Prosecuting Attorney, Ms. Ashton
Holmes refused
him s
witness; bookies telling him tell
me stop
writing complaint t
city,
that
it's making people
upset.
Strange, nobody ever been upset him being beaten; even
hi
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
18/55
miles away from residence
t
do Hve interview then was CBS then was Senate Judiciary
Committee Chainnan also representatives from the Hilliary Clinton Presidential
Campaign
having an
interest getting involved bringing national exposures none ofwhom
ever
materialized just
not the
right
way to
treat
people.
fully
~,
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
19/55
· · - - · ·
January
26th,
2016
Federal
Clerk's
Office
Attention: Ms. Johanna
Gus
J. Solomon Federal
Court
House
700
Stewart Street, Suite
231
O
Seattle, Washington 98101
RE
CV16-00046JC.
PLAINTIFF
JON C CARROLL
Dear Johanna c/o Federal
CJerk's
Office:
I
have this late afternoon received your package we discussed
over
telephone
from
last week's
conversation
regarding above mentioned styled ease number
and
plaintiff;
and
too,
situations
warranting
this
courfs
immediate attentions
as to such weighty
circumstances to such extremes demanded you e contacted because
of plaintiffs
open
remarl
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
20/55
,. • • --•& .-a&
. . ,uw.aa
..:ra,a'l,la&. s.a,a,1,11...,.•J
1...1......_.U..lt,.,A 'I-A.I,.,,
" '41,.H"' - '
JJ V~L ua,.. ,
""121.M\..IU..1
VJ.
Ul'- ' ~UJI 10 JG.lL U 1 /Ci
ca~l:1
il~d."° :lllrnffl-OB&RWo
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
21/55
the
up-redacted exposing
or
letteq
multiple
page s content
listing
other
indiyidu11
names;
but f ir
most sensitivewithin
all the
narrative
are
n mes
of
those
who• in
talking with tbl$ plaintiff. Mr.
Jon
c. Carroll. be
bad
been told of those whose
identities
that
would never
be
topics
of
discussions,
for their
own
priyatjes and
safeties. yet this plaintiff knowing this did
ewegiously
wjth wantonness' n gli~
make
public apetitioner's
personal and
private letter to
a federal authority regarding
matter
of public
interest. This
plaintiff
during
these visits operated
under
the guise while
pretending
to
take pen
and/or
pencil written
notes
for organizational reference purposes
while in
assisting
of
this petitioner's
book•
s pages
for
editing, being required ofdue
petitioner fallen by disabling stroke and unknown
numbers
of chapters in disarray, he
seized
on opportunity when
once
realized of their inflaming opportunities, immediately
their
sum
totals for marketable
values; has
brought this petitioner's efforts
now before
this court.
The
official,
and too
private,
documents
at
issue before this court, and as
well
s
in
the public domain are factual
and
authentic;
in
part, of he
whole
official internal
investigation which
was
never obtained from this petitioner. Probably never known of
before this letter to you,
yolll
office, this letter's date January 26
11 2016 with exception
of he known original I/
A report
..
ordered bwied by Police Chief
John C.
White;
there
has never been known of before the
very
first clandestine secretly made copy of this I/A
report,
which took
place during
latter winter months
into the year
2000.
An
attorney,
respe
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
22/55
Unconsciousable
any
defendant, required
to appear
before a judge during a pretrial
for
their
being
assigned
own
court appointed attorney;
when
after ori2inally defendant
sought after, subsequentJy denied access to the very discovery which had caused
defendant's arrest and jailing; required
of
for self-defense preparation[s] in a mwticipal
court of no records; whereas, causing defendant thereafter to be compeUed to go before a
higher court
for
purpose court's assigning
of
defendant's court appointed attorney. Letter
to Alabama State
Bar.
that defendants are required
to
hire
attorneys
in
ordg
to aet
J} PCrwork;
letter
to the
Alabama Administrative
Office of
Courts,
that
defendants
are
being denied discovery for trial defense PNJ aration[s.]
by
prosecutors. Commonly
unknown pretrial court appointed attorneys lack
of
interest and aloofness to make known
their
client before the court thru a vigorous defense and dynamic witness examination
and
evidence[s]
presentation[s]. Unlawful
evidences
and/or existence
thereof: "The law
is
clearly established that those tendering false infonnation to a prosecutor to believe he had
probable cause to prosecute
when
he did not violated the
CoDf
utionaJ
rights of
the
defendant."
Doe
v11
State
of
Louisiana: 974 F .2d 36
{U.S.
5 Circuit]
Anyone
claiming t
have such
a vested interest
in
''The Due Process Clause"
has to
look no further than taking the time to review public records applying to the
State o
Alabama's Comptroller
Office assigned for designated :records keeping and
reunbursements of fees and expenses for
court appointed attorneys [indigent[s]
vs. same
attorneys representations
and
fees
and costs
for
same or
similar docketed type cases;
therein nwnbe.-s speaks well for themselves. Washington vs. Glucksberg: 117 S. Ct.
(197) "The
due process clause guarantees
more
than fair process;
the Liberty
it
protects includes
more
than
an
absence
of
physical restraints.
The due
process clause
protects individual
Liberty
against certain government actions regardless of procedures
used to
implement them." Cutting
W1bridled
brazen plea deals
by
court appointed
attorneys for convenience
of
all
other parties; rather than sole purpose of court, the
intended justice
for
defendant
must
surely rise
to
and above understood levels best
described within
the
Black's
Law Book
definition: "dump-truck lawyers".
Rights
to
Courts-Access: Intentional obstruction o n inmates' access lo the courts is precisely
he
sort
o
oppression
the
JI Amendment and section
1983 are
intended
to remedy.
right
of
access to the courts
is substantive
rather
than procedural." Morello vs. J1mes:
810
F .2d 344 [U.S. 2°d Circuit
1987).
Furthennore
in
support
of
aforementioned:
~The
Right of access to the courts is one of he priyiJe~s and immunities under Article
IV.
n
aspect
of
th
Fitst Amendment, and
fo1 U1ded
on
the
Due
Process Clause-" Smith vs.
Mosccber; 899
li
2.d 940
(U.S. tolh
Circuit)
1990]
·
The United
States Constitution gaanntees alJ-individuals, as
well
as guards
against any indlvldual having been vfol•ted, denied
of
their Equal Rights,
Protections,
and
Due
Processes'; additionally as defined within
the
cont.ent
of Black's aw Book,
a
defendant assurances
of
having
a qualified
fair
and
equal
court appointed defense
counsel[s] addressed
in
definition; The Strickland Standard" and exercising all rights
providing defendant's case defined in definition, "Scintilla RµJes
of
Evidence[§].
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
23/55
..._
alj i t1't
t :
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
24/55
~
thy.
20, 2005
Nobody. wi..11
e veit kTLaw wlr.a.t
lr e 11144.
tlii.nJ.ln.g,
111h.i.l.e.
d.1tlvlng.,
lr.ome.
tlr.at
cold dait.k 1tai A
d1ti.11Lln.,
9an.u«1tJ n i te
alte.it. Al,
2 P~
to
/0
1 /ri
4.ltL{l tiui.p.fl.llle.n.t
cortple.te.d.
Hi. 1. cu . 4
lte.at.u
pA.ObabLy.
fcad ,ju.4.t 4fa.1tte.d.
wa.11.111.i.119-
i.t. . i .ntuloa g.ood.. Would.
lte. have.
bu.n.
LL4.te.ni.ng. to hl4 f-avo1ti.le.
it.a.di.o
4f4ti.on. Oil
i.n.
deep
4uo-con4.ci.ou4
thou1Jr.t4. of
aciite.1t4
i.nvolvi.TLJ lr.i.4
•01tk: ILLe.iaL d1tu,4 ln.ve.d.ti.
~ati.on.4?
To
1e.t
mo1te.
com/01ttahle.
Aad lte.,
LLAe
a.lot
o/
•e.n
a/ie.1t.
ie. t t lnf off wo1tk
1
Loo4e.n.e.d Jr.i.4
ti.e.
1
4. knot and 4hi.Jtt c0Lla1t but
ton?
01t
wa.4. lr e
ma1be.
tlr.i.n.kln9- abo.ut
hi.4 111i.fe.
1
hl4 4.0n.
dau1Ate.~
kn.0111ln1
W44
cu4toma1tv
tlr.e.y. 1te.
1te.a.dv- foll
be.J;
tltou1A AOt a.4.Le.e.p
untll
afte.1t hi.4
e.ve1t1 wo1tk-ni.te. 4.afe 1te.tu1tn lr.ome.?
Could Lt
have been.
po44.i.ble. tA¢t di.4tcin.t he.a.d.li.t.eA 1te./le.cte.d
ln Ai 4
1te.a1t
vlew
mi.1t./lo1t
di.dn.'t
ie.t
lr i 4 cittur.tlon? Had e pa44ed
a
pa11.ked vehlcle
afte1t tu/lni.n1 off Rock~
b~cin.clr.
~oad onto Youn1
A•e11.lca DAlv wi..tAout /lai.4ln1 anv- eau4e fo1t alaAm, noA
4o•e. Aen4e
o/ U4fe.Jl.cv? 011. •a~be. Aavi.ni 1one. coaple.te.11 un-noticed bv Alm
a paAked ve.hlcle ju,t be~ond neaA
cuAve.
Lagln.i ln walt th.at
cold
daAk Tue.4.aa, nlte app1toacnln~
tAe.
o clock nou4 wi.tA lt4.
en1lne
i.d.Li.n.1 .d.Lle.n.tlj
wAi..Le. e.d.a,u.t
dl4.a.Lpati.n.~ .a.l.0111l1 tli.e. occupant.
d4Lve11.
a.wai.tln1
anxlou4LI /oA
, l~aL
to
acce.Le.Aate. mhe.Aeh1
tAAu4t
ln~ a Loni con.tlne.ou4 wAlte.-111.a,l4h
fl«IIIJllLn1
4~oke. thAOUfA e.4.cape
11.oute.?
looklni ln.
dl11.e.ctlon o/ hl4 hoae ,oon ca,ae. lnto vl,euo Aou4e.
4
po11.ch-Llte ,Ai..nnln1
b11.L1h~L1
4l•lLa11. to that
of
a
4 aaan'4 ,ho11.e
beacon iuldi.n1 hlM home. lnto
4afe.-lr.ci11.bo11..
Slowlnf
du11.ln
1
ftl
4
ap•
p11.aach
to make
11.l1h~ tu11.n. oTLto d~lv~a~
what waA e
tAi.nkln.1,
ee
ln~
the
ca11.po11.t doo11. into
hi..,
home? Aft II. 4ioppc.d.
dld
he.
l t
a
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
25/55
e.xt4a
mlnu.te loniett.
1l4ten.lAJ to
4adLo,
01t
W44 e ~evlewln.i ln
hi.4
mlnd
once mo~e iatlte.4lAJ ltl4 wo•k-da., 4 tnouiAtA
a/te.tt.
t«tt.n
ln.~
of/
vaAlcle.
1
4
e.n1lne.?
la.,
t
t ~
fUlck /La.4h
of
6ackup
Llte.4
ioLni
/1(.oa d1tlve. po4ltlon to pa•k,
04
•a16e
Al4
foot ~e.m.aved f4om
b4ake petal
4wltcA a/te.tt.
i.n
pa~keJ po,ltlon Mn.kn.owlng.l.v to Ai.m
4Uldln1 a AltnaL
that wltAln
a. nln.ute would place Al4
4ou.L ln
a
U /e.-daatlt
4ttt.u.19-Le.-----------111ltlclt
111ltltln.
adJi.tlon.aL
cou.pLe. o/
111.04a m[nute., wouLJ La4e.?
V/1,)at
wel(.e hLt.
tltou.1J,.t4
u.ac:lti.n.J
/04 ve.lti.c.l..e. '4 ln.tulo1t. dootr.
han.dle.
to
ope.n.,
4n.J
whlle.
exltln~
4tandln.f
u.p4l1ht
tho4.e
fe.w
un
known. to Alm
hl4
La4t t toufltt,. ALoni 4lde
of
ve.ltlcle ~lth_doo~
open..e.d wlde he. 4food
•llhoue.tte.J a1aln4.t ltl, lto111.e.',
po~clt-llte.
i.Ll.ut1ti.n.a.ti.on. a.n.d wltlti.n 111.i.lll4.e..co1'd4 wcu
,ta.R.ln.g.
4fto .t 11.·a119 e.
i.n.to
doubLed-ha.411.e.L, ~I
4a.,ued-o/l 4hot1un
•u11le
/l11.e.
fLcuhe4..
04~iLnaLL, tAou1kt a paA4ini v.enlcLe A 6ackfl1tln.1 hla fami.Lv
hea4d
a Loud 1&l.l /011. hlA wlle. fUlcklv the11.eafte.11. ln Au ch a ,ound
Ahe. hoLte.d to dooa11. open.ln1 to fln.d hiA Ai1tu11Lin1 io 1e.t to h ~
and AtiLL
cohe11.e.nt eaou~A .Aen •eeln1
Ai 4
cAlld11.en to
tu1tn awa~
collap4lni on. ca11.po11.t
/Loo11.
to
avoid
Al4
child1te.n
wltnf ..IJ.alni Alm
dlein~. He. die.d LA 111lfe 4
Lap aRd
411 a t awav f~o• hlA cltlLJ4~n
1
4
vle.111 without eve11
4pea.kln.i
Au11.11.oundLd 61 ,Aotiun
1
A pelleted em-
he.dd.e.J. wall..• 9an.a.u.a~v JI 1978, Tu.u.dav- app1toxi.m.a.te.lv 10:40 P/11
•
f/lli.at
di..d
lte. know?
Viii.at h.ad he. u,i.f.nu.4.eJJ IJ/lzat/111/to 1 1144
lte
lnve.4tl.-
iatln.~
that •andateJ
Al, aA4a.A4lnatlon? At
home
l~
11.ont
of famliv?
Fo4
pa4t 27
ge.a11.4 who ha4 e.ven
11.eaLLv
ca11.e.d, and
~A J-
not
the.g?
N«~co~lc
4
DLte.c~lve. S~11.,e.ant
Ro6e.~t
l4Ck4on L, 6u4led in the.
~ate..4. 0/
Heav£n Ce.m.eta4u
DothaJJ,
ALhLa-a.. H
' W44 . f~le.n.Jf
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
26/55
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
27/55
II. S. S_.na to t R£.clv:url Sh. t> L I,'/_
Pt
CAM~cA
St~cct
Roo• C-561
~ont,o•&"V, lla.6a~a 36/0f
.
)
i,o.,e.•n~tt Bo6
'iU.l~v
600
uute."
A"a"uc
f:ont10~&4j, l aba~~ 36130
·'tu11. o//i..cc.'-t
publJ
.c.lv up1tu4, , '/ c~nee.ttn.a. an.ti
co•p1u4lo,u.
/ .J1t.
/Q.~U; a/ la&Wtla. fe•n-z.~u 1'4 • •~.,_t.Q.[e.~ l ollo ./Jt1j l..a I
ru.t.J
··
f '-4&1U01t.ttrv
a.n.:I
4cut
"J.d,11.l.,al,l.,. / 11/atizo,.a6Le
i&1t.
r.1othu,
._
'
a.n.d /(l~h. '-
1
-t. ;-.."le./ wlille
'.l.trJa.i.t.ln.;;.
«1&1tl.t1u4LJI ttnv, n.&1114i tttu4.t-
ln;.
UJi.th.
;.ua.ude., Ir.ope. a.n..J
pu:;e.u. tl,.e.~
1
Ll 401111 /i..n.il ,cuol.ve.
j_
a4J
Aa,
..
elo4u1t~ tAi.44 c.AtLd'•
44 :e
~~tu~tt •
.Mi11lo1J4li o1ll cttlmi.nal.
ar.t..t1.
f 4il,,uLrl a._ 01t111.en.·U.o,a&J bv th ..
ca..u.J 1//e.c.t.eA 1111. IILa.6a.:rii.a.n.JJ. can.not
be a.Jd,te.u.~.r v
i'""' o//lc.u,
CfJ-T ,
Jl1e.n.
01.&.,u .
a.11."'
c .
:d,4.Hltf
uttC011rJ.111n.l1 tuai.7u"- cru.e4 t1J.11l11;
'
)on.-. un11.He.11,./•,A .~i
:1u1t r , /Lcu ,•.1m11 q11'1.U./v,,s. f.u t ,Hu ~'luri.L
:i.l,i.nie.44«-4 11.,d {JU{•l.i.c.
co11,4l,../e1t.a~lon.4
6e. e c. t.e,,. f.?
..
,.
Janua~9 JI, 97~
N«4COflc:4 'o leL
r.t&etlv~
s~-,e~nt
R~b~,t
~ ~ C ~ 4 ~ n ~4•~A4ln~l~~, ?J ~ ~ 4 4 u~ll.~4olv~1.
/f:4 • 1.8. 1~t.·Ule.1 an,.J fi-1, tit.ic::C:.e Pa,111..~u
6ot.~ IJ
,A.l.;la 4C.lt1Jol
t
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
28/55
Tna Ho4a1&«6la RLcAc4d SA&Lb1
{'
.S,
S n11to1t
1
Stat& r,/
t'l.l«, 1..a.
N•11t«~LLLa
lnte•n4tLo~aJ.
~ 4t••t
1000 ~l&n. Haath Boulg~a~~ 120127
Hunt,~£lLe,
~l«&••• 3582•
D.~. s+.•toA JA&J.6,,
Jou1t
&J/tp1tu.e..J
C:0/lC:UiU.
a.1ti conp«.u.Lon..&
/01
, ...a, o/
Al.a.&11aci: t&CJt.
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
29/55
l,
T11.~
/lon.011.46Le.
T
u.11...J
lvelle.tt
J ( .f ,u.-a11t.«t Lv .
2
n..f lJ i..t
11.
l.e
t
S clt.e.
o:~ A
4.'1.oama
3500
t44ta11.n
£ouL&11~1ti G250
/.;ont; J111t 1t:h AL~6e1nf4 ]6116
l
e.a,1
i t.p.tU&Jl
tJat i.ve. l11e.u.tt.:
JuLv, II ,
2005
It
L•
l ~ tJ l lab. l
to
c:01tcLa:fa
vou.11. t>//.i.cc.4
I po.&Lti..01&4 e.1ut.t.L4 t.lr.a.t ,.,,._
. ;;i
Sene1to11.
S~e.J..b~',
LnvoL11Ln~ t11.~;l~
m14te11.lou4
di..a.appca11.~nc~ o/ ALab«•a
ta..&n.aj,44 .... ~czta.lc.c.
HoL/.r,wa.:1.
O,.u. {),MJ&l.f' tltoug.n 4.t11.4LL gcAu. Loud.Ly. ;
Senato4
1
4icon~ll.n4 /0,1 11.e..aaLv~. W&
too a4
anLt~i wi.t~
S-1lato,1
1
4
caLL
t,~u-t. fi,1
lie
m:oie.
prt.11.tlci..pa.ti.rr.,;,
pu11lii..nj, 4'.JCpe11.tl4& y.e.t. P"-"l"""'~d,
avoi.d-
i..11..l
"-"If
pc. lc.e}'t,i..1'rt4 o / ina:lve.1ttc.11c~4.
ile.«11; u Illa.A/I "i..Li.u.
he.,ut4
1
1 l
,iu"ti.n.;
c:r.ichii.ti.)i~
a.11~
llUJ.t
1
cont.L l4 .i,u.a. anxi.01.u1te u
/off.
/IJ.s..
Ho.LLowaJ
'_. ..
4.a.,l.e.
11.etu11.n
ho,&1
,~d cL04u11.e4
/11.om
tlr.i.•
1tlJhtmczA&l4h &v~nt
~4& da4.e.4~Llli'o/
I
aLL
FBI
~ e t i
and Lnve4ti.jati..ve
4f..4.0ult~&4.
,~'r,w Mtudl.n.9-
aLl co,.u.te.1. t, .te.4.p~ct,
en..J
.tev U.Jr.CIJ,
/011. n4. HoLLo·w'l./ 4
. .
pa.ica.n.t.1
1
,,allli.4v, a,d
/1tLe.11.J.,_ we .u.-11,u.,t 1', 1ou11.
",~/i.aM
4. Vllo&
i.4te11t .4t,
c:on-
1
C?.t/14
1
t:tJ1r1p«-1~'i.on.4
Joi..n.Ln9-
wi.tA Se.n.ato,1 S te..lh:1,
ucoulf.afi.1L9'
St .1ta.Co,1.
:J,,_{:'.'
.Se.44C:.o,u, ala•, wi..tlr. ~ove,1no.t 8ob 'hll.e..11- wla1J luu too
6u.,i
con:t.a.ctll.d
c.a.l.1-
\
i..n.,,~
lo1t f&J
1
4 ·.'&qua../.
pcutlc.i.paf.i.o,i.4
e:cl.a.tl.n.J. t.tR.i.fU& Un.C.ORll:101&1.tt
UllU,ufve.J
.Stat,z. ol
Alt&6f.lllla.
e4,4~,1,,
a.LL
lea.11ln.a.
on.,z. cor.amc,n de.nomi..n.a.to1t
1
/ QJJJ
ur./o,1c.uz~nt..
.. ,
1\
1
:.tn:cotlc, /JO .tttlv& Sug.e.a.n.t
"l'r1Li.ce.
r>//i.cu. 7?ooe4t Pa.clu.on.
tU
4a.44i.lltite.J 26
.;:,~cu4 a ; a ,J.i...,d i.n
wi.}e.
1
4 at,-A..
fl/4.
;l.B. Ra.a.4J.c.:1- a.n.d / ;-,.. 71taci..a
Ha.111.Le.tt.
'
bot.it
l l 1
. 0UJl~ i.1& t1tullk
o/.
va.lai.c.1.e. r.1u1td11.,1ul ue.cutlon 4f.~L& 6
fl&a.1&4
a.~o.
'I
N
,, ewottt.hJ
fli.o..
Ha.1111.e.tt.
'.t.
/a.tit.~tt
W44
/e.l.LoUJ
poLi.ce.
"//i..c.e.1&
'JJltla
31.ekun.,
Ai.m.-
,1J.e.(.'
,t11.l)wn.l1tf}~U1td1.11.
4U4{'i.< t.OU,4
C:LllCU IU.tiz.nc4c., da.v4 p11.lo1t. t.o 1"""d.
;,,l'4V
t.?.-1ti.-
111 MJ-
i.nvoLvi.n.j.
de.a.tit. o/ 6 .:z.c,~ m.a.n.,
Co1t.pol\aL
noh&At ,1a.wLe.tt lllf ;lo.li..,:e. Aca- (l..81,;
.~
It
i.&r&d, IZA Wa4 /
Q.C,~40~
•
/fi
1
/ Q.lll.i.L, 4half.
ln.,; r: n
I, t.n. tit «n.d J.lt
OU/
e,i
· .
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
30/55
T t'f.
i an.qca.61.a. l4••L
~1&1&. S,.ltlt
.St~t~
S&1i~to•,
St&t&
ot ~La6--.
'labaac
StAt•
' ••••,
7);.C
I I I So11tA
U11l.•1t
,t,ac.•t
f::on:t1-o•e.1ty
1
.~.laiua 36106
I
.
·'
iJ
t . u
Suat••
-S..
u.A,
911.l1
/]
1
200$
i
.1e.
U-f~~t •I 1oa.•
•I/Le•
to
j•l.n.
a,Lt.,\ U.S. SM to•
'IU.cl,.«11.i
Slttll>v
' ....
:uid
C0aatt4Lc«t• ,
.....
Llit~--~t, c•ncac"-1; Clld co-,44~~-n.,& ,n
..
oi~,4~ ike
. iu
£.c.t,
rz.11([1cLe.f
a11..,1t.0111tdi.1tf
,a./ 11.s,e,1: 4
tli.•t1pf' ~1u1.Act.
4 / Ala6a.a:i
t4,.:.~
¢ f~4 M,. la.~l&& l~LL••a1, G4d ~oo
S&ll4t••'•
S~alb1'~ po~ttLoA c&l.fi~;
.~u
llla&e.
~Bl
··,1tvutt.g.c.tl.1fe. ptut.LcLp11.tl11a•.
fl11.t.'/ l lU.UI.
tAu.c.
•cit.ta."~
CJ••4nd. •tt~Q•t 1t.-.&ttLetlo,u, «l.l •lf&Lla&lc cu,~t,
~-
t:44is
Av~i.l.ahL~
. .
,up&di.U t1t1i1..l;
L11.
e.ffo4f,_4 to •«i.e..,& c•itfL1'11 L1 J ao1t11t.Lnp. ucot.Lo1t.al. 1u.•
. . . '
d~fl.6
•• Holl•~4i'•
/t111Ll1 a.\•
e.,cp&clfl.tlcLA~t UtJ.Ao~A
t~ p~bltc tALen.
u"'"'e..u•i1uhlti g.•L•f•• · S1t;u ly ju,t.tLc.c.
//IIL°J.L
.f.ttcvLve. 6&Ln.g.Ln.g.. 1t.u.,lve. tuz.d
~ l 04U4 wLth
A4.
H~llo,x,.v'4 ~·,~
i t&t~•n A-···
Su«toc ~SA-.lh1'" u..Juv-ttlf..t "" ..
n.~t.uu.t.lt.v CJ1.li.i1.ti.n.p. 4r,rpp~1t.t
f1t.o,11. a l.
rHr,.-..rJ. t.h"l.
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
31/55
.......
..
. .. ·
·--· .
. .
.
,
.
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
32/55
The Honorable
Richard Shelby
United States
Senator,
Alabama
1 Lee
Street B-28
Fede:ral Court
House
Montgomery, Alabama
36104
Re
Re.;eJection CDmJmign Advertising s Content; Being Here.
Listening, and
Helping
Dear Senator
Shelby:
Thank you
for your
annual
visit this past
week
ago to our Circle City, Dothan~
realizing
how
your schedule, especially during latter part
of
he
week
is
full
and
demanding, anxious to
return
to your family and friends is most applaudable. Although
the time
set
aside
for
our
having
anticipated
attending
your speaking engagement
here
was
required of altering, and subsequently thereafter missed
you
before your leaving.
Irregardlessof aforementioned, it
had
been genuinely hope that
while
here your
schedule
had
been planned
out
far enough
in
advance to be flexible enough
to, if
not at
surely visit, at a minimwn
to have had
at least telephoned the
widow, Ms. BilUe Jackson;
of this citfs, black, shotgun assassinated
at
near point blank range
City
of Dothan Police
Detective Sergeant Robert Jackson.
He was
my
friend fellow
police
patrol officer.
ery long overdue is
the
resolving his case, closure for his widow and family.
Senator
Shelby. you
may remember our
having exchanged
correspondences
during
the
tragic aftennath involving the
disappearance
of Birmingham, Alabama high school
graduate teenager Ms. Natalie Holloway in A tuba A tragedy too that remains
unresolved
today; that
you may also
remember
that you,
your office, called for, encouraged
the F.B.I.
to go and render assistance
to
Arubian investigators, likewise your public position
pertaining
to
such a sensitive
issue was
echoed
by
this state s then current governor,
Governor
Bob R iley.
l mention these things as a preface t
following:
Police Officer Robert Jackson was
shotgunned
down during a January 31st moonless, cold, rain drizzling night in front of his
residence getting
out
of his police car
with his wife
and two
small
children inside their
home
awaiting his return
home
from work.
Hardly
a day
goes
by
now
that other states are
commonly
witnessed by mainstream and cable news honoring present--day shot/killed
police officers. Yet,
this
state has never recognized and honored with
equal
enthusiasm,
which should have been witnessed by other states involving
this
officer s widow;
SffOULD, NOW
RISE
TO
A
LEVEL OF YOUR
OFFICE S
IMMJ; DIATE
CONCEB S,
TO BE
lN CONCERT WITH YOUR RE-EL~CTIQN CAMPAIGN ADVERTIZING S
KEY
WORDS, HELP AND NEED. This officer
was
drafted, he volunteered for service,
serving four
yeliU'
tour of duty, a Vietnam War vetenm, Honorably Discharged, returning
home to become
a police officer
is
deserving of
more
respect from his aovemment than
him,
his widow/family ever received. IS HE
DUE ANY LESS.
THAN OTHER
STATE?
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
33/55
I have been for a
longtime, years, respectfully seeking
to
have Governors
Riley
and
Bentley
extend
this state s
compassion and
goodwill
to
this officer s widow; without
success;
not
even a
call
or letter, much less a personal visit.
Many
times I
have
sought
after this
state s
govemor,
Governor
Robert
Bentley
preparing
a
bill for
presentation
before
the
legislature for
their
approval:
Governor George C.
Wallace signed
a
proclamation for a $10,000.00 reward, never been ny movement on all during these
years;
that
the state
move
to convert such proclamation s title to an ct of compassion s
title
in memory o Officer Jackson, since his case will never be solved
Senator Shelby sir,
do you
not agree, it is way past time that this police officer, as
if
he were an
officer
in any
other state be
given his equal and legal
resolution s
closure,
i
not for him;
at minimwn
for
his widow, his son
Robert,
Jr. and
daughter?
Thanki
you
in
advance I
am
hl rii~~
003
Glasgow
Drive I
Dothan, Alabama
36301
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
34/55
October 29, 2015
John Carroll
he
Henry County Reporter
Post Office Box 2
Abbeville,
Alabama
36310
John, this being another presidential debate day's night
has
drawn
me to
reflect
on my
notes
from
when we last spoke on the phone, about 1pm early afternoon
of
the
nd
scheduled
debate. During that phone conversation
you told me
that either you had been.
or
were
in a
meeting
with
someone
and
was
retwning my
call to
you
from
earlier
in
day.
That you had
a hot
Jead on someone who may have been
a on
the
scene
' crime
scene
witness where girls murdered was last thing
you
told me.
Then, during your return call
to me, you
told
me that.
yes, you were coming
by
after
getting through
with
whatever
it was
you
were
doing, would
be
maybe
about
4:00 p.m.
to
which
I
obviously
said fine.
That
phone
call
was the Jast
time speaking with
you even
after having my
calling and leaving messages over next couple, three,
of
days
~thout
having ever heard
back from
you.
Then,
in response
to my
last left
mesmtge, when
you
do
call
back
telling me
that
you have been cow
shopping,
and that I
should
fish or
cut bait
was
rude
and
unbecoming
what
I believed the caJiber
of
your pen;ona. Had you appeared
as you had said you were, you would have been
hen: to
participate in a Conference Call;
but you were a no show that I had
to
make an excuse for after planning on
your
being
here. not by guessing no, as direct result
of
your own word.
John, you may
take such
as
insignificant, I place a lot
of
confidence
in the
honoring
of
another's word,
in
return their being responsible for only doing no more no less
than
what
it
is
that
they themselves
have
told
me
they were
going to
do.
Seen this day and time as
minute,
was
a
part of
the
way
I
was
raised
from
childhood,
as well
too strive to
treat
others
as
I
would
want
them to
~ me, and I have, as
best
I could, but of course like
anything else, there has been exceptions; and that when J told someone something that
was
going
to cause them
to make
dccision[s] b sed on
what
I told them,
thetefore
I
became duty
bound and obligated to them
first
and foremost into that
day,
evening, night,
week, month.. . . . . . . . . hat is to say, unless, should,
in
the event I saw ch'cumstances
arising far
enough
beforehand, whereby
dictating
that
I postpone any agreed upon
meeting or
obligation;
here again I was
duty boood/obligated
tO notify other either
that
l
was
not coming, or that
I was
running late, exact time unknown, others should
make
their
own plans accordingly; therefore
not
leavins
them
standing alone alongside the
street
curb looking
up
the street to see
i wus
next vehicle
comin&,
We
first began building upon our confidential,
exposing
corruption, relationship when I
told you of my need
for someone to help
me in the editina of
a
book
Mitten,
but
since
stroke
was havine
difficult
time
organizing materials Mitten for editing.
You 1old
me
of
knowing a
lady from
Australia that
you
could contact
who was well
versed
in
editing. I
invited
you
to my home, we sat on front
porch, you
wanted
to
make
an audio
of
our
conversation, I ae,eed
J
trusted
you,
only
before your using audio tape's content that I
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
35/55
· · · ·· .....
wanted
a dubbins
of
conversation s entirety for transcribing onto
paper for my
reading;
after all since
my
having
been
fallen
by
disabling stroke
as
I had
told you
I
had
a concern
about my verbalizing skills, therefore
seeldng
BCCUl tlC) . To this day you have yet to bring
or send the audio s copy which we have both
agreed
upon,
even
witnessed by the lady
having joined in the conversation. True you brought me a pink
thing,
I
had
no
use
for
since I had
no
way
of
using it to really know what its content contained.
Then after further discussions we moved on into the arena of special H O productions
to
get coverage; then lastly you were talking about doing articles yourself
leadin&
off with
my
friend
Jackson s
assassination.
Then you
decided be best
to go
with the
prls
stories.
So John really I don t know what direction the original goal
moved
in; I was supporting
your suggestions in obtaining
end
results.
John, l
realize
coming from me this is liken to water off a duck s back, an old fan, sitting
at home
with
a
lot
of
time
on
his
hands;
but the
reality is
in the
facts.
Since your
first
visit
to my home you have left
me
anticipating your coming back
to
visit my home on
no
less
than three separate occa..11:ions when
factually
you
never
did on any, and which
I
consider
wo.rst, the bad manners
not
bothering to
call
in
advance
advising that you wasn't, very
rude
and
disrespectful, not only involving me,
but too
of
my wife.
we could have had
time for
other
plans maybe.
First
time I remember well, you decided to go
fishing
you
said, the next time was about your cows, and nex.t time was
that
you
had just to
much
to
do at home; and
all
that s fine, I have never expected my being any priorities in your life,
but I have expected the same respect and courtesies
that
you yourself respect
from
others.
Apparently putting us at cross beliefs, but in our own pursuits for righting wrongs; while
I will
concede rm
sucking flexibility s hind tits, confined to home resulting due to health,
and unable to drive. So good luck. BUT l
STILL
W )NT
AND
EXPECT MY
COPY OF
AUDIO UNEDITED WE PLUS YOU DO
HAYE
MY DISC OF
TI:IE
PHENIX
STORY
MOVIE"
I
HAVE NOT
RECIEIVED
BACK EITHER.
s
I
trust
our
friendship
will continue
wtlmpaired.
Our city, county, state, and nation s good people, the poor and
minorities, have been denied and
victimized of
heir equal rights so callously and
deliberately for way to long
all
that can should always never forget them
Throughout my adult
years,
in retrospect, I
can
take pride that I treated others
os
I
would
want
them to treat me, and to
be
as good as my
word to them,
unless otherwise prevented
from doing so, advising as soon as
p0$Sible.
John,
[ do not have any reservations that you are a good and decent man with well
intentions and applaud you for your contributions; none ofwhich are
my
issues with
you,
othenvi simply put, I WAS
RAISED
THAT A MAN S
WORD
IS IIlS
BONDI
Be
r 1;
J -M ./~
K~s .
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
36/55
October
30, 2015
Ml .
John Carroll
The
Henry County
Report
Post Office Box 2
Abbeville~
Alabama
36310
Fax 334)460-9706
John:
Possibilities existing
in
lieu of infonnal meeting
that could
give an
officially
witnessed
and legal
deposition;
my
after
thoughts
regarding
this
matter rises specifically
due
the
fact
of
my
age and
health;
but primarily
anticipation
for my
considerations
o
equal
and
reasonable potential for my family s
future
securities resulting from this documentary
project; their
personal
protections and financial
soundness
is
o my
utmost concerning
importance should in the interim I should
not
survive the full extent net profit
gain,
the
full and unknown extents o your hard work s documentary s success involving this
area s corruptions
paid
for
on the back
o he
poor and minorities
is surely
destined
to
become not only a national but internationally acclaimed achievement.
I will lend
Wlto
YOU my support towards the ac.complishina o
your
resolve, in further
review
o my
accumulations, such transfer ofinfonnation will require
o
you,
your time
and patience; having said this;
the
contributions
heretofore for
the
record will
be
rewarding not
only
for both,
you
and
myself;
but even more
so
for all those having been
victimized, made
selective targeting for the
violations and/or denials
o
their basic
equaJ
rights.
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
37/55
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
38/55
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
39/55
Message directly from
J
io response to your message
to
ntm of last
•·
{I had nothing to do with this but be the
intermediary.
·tRemind him
th t
i am on
the
streets of Canada trying
to
avoid bad
people '
That
I
am fully capable of
re1urning
and beating his elderly ass'
1
H,~t
ail l ,are
ab :iut
i;:; justice and t,a\fe moved thls
torward more
than
anyone else the past 10 years
with
exception of Brian
Dowling
It I had
not
gotten
these
t 1es
out ot ttle
country they would be sealecs
forever due
to
a corrupt judge
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
40/55
Message directly frorn J
in
response to your message to him of last
l P·
{I had nothing
to
do
with
this bm be the Intermediary.)
"Remind him
that
I
am
on
the
streets of
canada trying to avoid
bad
people"
'1'hat
I
am
fully
capable of returning and beating
his
elderly ass"
That all I care about is justice and have moved this torward more than
anyone else the past 10 years with exception of Brian Dowling•
ft I had not gotten tnese
t es
out ot the country
tnev
would be
sealed
forever due to a corrupt judge
November
19,
2015
Mr.
John Carroll
The Henry
county Report
I
write
now
in response
to
this
faxed
message received 11/19
2015 from you
via 914-939-1476@ 03:38p ident i f ied
as
bein
"from J"
No doubt, that while in the pursuits for just ices,
attemptin
to
make wrongs
r ighted
daily
schedules
are
altered. I f
I hav
ever failed to
compliment
you and/or
thank
you for any
of
yo
contribut ions, especial ly
contributing
to
my
fr iend Brian,
l
apologize,
therefore
I now
ha$ten to
thank you for
any/,11.
You were welcomed i n to
my
home, introduced
to my family; wit
clear understandings and agreements. From the
very
fir&t day
you
were
ask
not
to
vidQO or
audio
because
of
my speech,
you
persisted,
my
agreeing
for
audio
with understanding
you get
me a
copy of uneoited audio for my having t ranscribed to see
•xactly what
I
had aaid,
I
have yet to get th is per
our agree·.
f&nt,
before
you
le f t town. You used my Video photo af te r be-
ng
aak no t to
video on more than
one
time.
Mr.
Carroll ou
1if
as_since our f i r s t m t Y
.ETTEJfs.
DO(:JJMF.N l l l.
Rf
~~jM~o~T~:,:t l-~r~f d
~o
~Ice
nubl ic
p D 1 , r
l l ~ U T Y
uT.1,.-n.,_
-
7
f M-/V,~1, l7 5*
~·_ I.JjJA.
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
41/55
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
42/55
DESTROY AFTER RECEIPT
A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR HAS NOW BEEN APPOINTED. FRIEND HAPPY AS
SELECTfD PROSECUTOR
HAS INTENSE
LASER VISION
AND
HAS TAKEN
DOWN
D.A. SANDJUDGES.
(keep this
quiet
for now)
Prosecutor ls on a plane
now
Friend
w nts
permission
to
give him your
contact
information
for
him
ta
meet
with
you as Friend did
not
give
out your
name.
Most likely your residence is under heavy surveillance. Afraid papers may
b a
compromised in your
location
and
it
is
not safe to
ha11e
picked up now.
Fax
all
necessary papers to me for
safe
keeping.
Let
me know if the fax needs to run all
night as I Sive you permission
to
do so; I will
move
fa) machine
out
of bedroom
if
needed for special project.
Much Jovel
YOU
DID IT
The Calvary is riding inl
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
43/55
--
t4D , -
2
15 i)C:a GB];i: l ~a·~·nt °n l l ID~Wo
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
44/55
November 23, 2015
Mr.
John Carroll
The
Henry county
Report
Post
Office
Box
2
Abbeville,
Alabama 36310
Re: Message Faxed
J1/23/2015@
3:57 p.m. From [914] 939-1476
Pursuant to
your
faxed
message
dated 11/19/2015 @3:38
p.m. (via]
:from
[914] 939-1476
titled specifically, Message
directly from Jin
response
to your message to him
oflast
_ ... Page one
o
one paragraph two,
That
I
am
fully capable
o
returning and beating
his
elderly ass ''
Please, be re•adviscd;
refer to my
responding
said fax
dated
11/19/2015@ 5:10
p.m.
regarding
my
properties
involving any/all
letters, docwnents, or
forms
for
your further
use
and/or
public
referrals too;
since date o same
fax,
11/19/2015.
you
have
not
had, nor
do
you
now
have,
or will be authorized
for public
and/or private use thereof; furthennore,
you are respectfully requested o [via {914} 939-1476]
to
adhere to instructions per this
fax dated, l l/23/2015i that
you
have
not
been, are
not
now, not n :futW e,
authorized
to
make
public, and/or duplicate
for
private
gain
these {my various titled personal
documents.
Otherwise,
best
wishes in
your
future
pursuits
for
justice.
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
45/55
-
8/18/2019 Debunking Jon Carroll
46/55
Case 1:16-cv-00229-MHT-SRW Document 4 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE
DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
JON
B.
CARROLL
P l a i n t i f f
v .
JOHN
WHITE e t a l .
Defendants .
ORDER
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:16cv229-MHT
For
good
cause shown
t i s ORDERED
t h a t
pursuant
to
28 U.S.C. §
636
t h i s case i s
r e f e r r e d t o
the United
Sta tes Magis t ra te
Judge
fo r cons idera t ion
and
d ispos i t ion o r recommendation on
a l l p r e t r i a l
mat te rs
as may be appropr ia te .
DONE t h i s the 6th day of Apr i l 2016.
/ s / Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STA