december 1, 2008 - brampton...december 1, 2008, re: application to amend the zoning by-law and...

.

December 1, 2008

Members Present: Regional Councillor P. Palleschi - Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) Regional Councillor G. Gibson – Wards 1 and 5 (Vice Chair) Regional Councillor E. Moore – Wards 1 and 5

Regional Councillor J. Sanderson – Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G. Miles – Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J. Sprovieri - Wards 9 and 10 City Councillor J. Hutton – Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B. Callahan – Wards 3 and 4 City Councillor S. Hames – Wards 7 and 8 City councilor V. Dhillon – Wards 9 and 10

Staff Present: Planning, Design and Development Department J. Corbett, Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development A. Smith, Director of Planning and Land Development Services

M. Won, Director of Engineering and Development Services K. Walsh, Director of Community Design, Parks Planning and

Development D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services

K. Ash, Manager of Development Services M. Gervais, Development Planner P. Aldunate, Development Planner C. LaRota, Development Planner T. Theocharides, Development Planner B. Steiger, Central Area Planner

Corporate Services Department M. Kitagawa, Legal Counsel Management and Administrative Services Department P. Fay, City Clerk C. Urquhart, Legislative Coordinator T. Brenton, Legislative Coordinator

MINUTES Planning, Design and Development Committee

2008 12 01 of 33

The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m., and adjourned at 9:35 p.m. After due consideration of the matters placed before this Committee, the members beg leave to present its report as follows: Item Recommendation A. PDD260-2008 Approval of Agenda B. Conflicts of Interest C. Consent D1. PDD261-2008 Application to Amend the Zoning By-law and Proposed Draft

Plan of Subdivision – KLM Planning Partners Inc. – 1624882 Ontario Inc. – West of Chinguacousy Road and south of Queen Street West – Ward 6 (File C03W05.012).

D2. PDD262-2008 Application to Amend the Zoning By-law – Glen Schnarr and

Associates Inc. - Amaral Eduardo – 1453 Queen Street West – South of Queen Street and East of Creditview Road – Ward 6 (File C03W05.014).

D3. PDD263-2008 Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law –

Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc. – Chacon Properties – 3042 Mayfield Road – North side of Mayfield Road – East of Hurontario Street - Ward 2 (File C01E18.015).

E1. PDD264-2008 Application to Amend the Zoning By-law - IBI Group (Ros

Sal Developments Inc.) - 190 Clark Boulevard - North side of Clark Boulevard, west of Lisa Street - Ward 3 (File C03E04.021) (See Item F1).

E2. PDD265-2008 Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law

and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – Candevcon Limited – 1281216 Ontario Inc. – North and south side of Tortoise Court, west side of Goreway Drive, south of the intersection of Countryside Drive and Goreway Drive- Ward 10 (File C07E15.009) (See Item F2).

F1. PDD264-2008 Application to Amend the Zoning By-law - IBI Group (Ros

Sal Developments Inc.) - 190 Clark Boulevard - North side of Clark Boulevard, west of Lisa Street - Ward 3 (File C03E04.021) (See Delegation E1).


2008 12 01 of 33

F2. PDD265-2008 Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – Candevcon Limited – 1281216 Ontario Inc. – North and south side of Tortoise Court, west side of Goreway Drive, south of the intersection of Countryside Drive and Goreway Drive- Ward 10 (File C07E15.009) (See Delegation E2).

G1. PDD266-2008 2008 Development Allocation Update – Managing the Rate,

Direction and Quality of Growth in Brampton (File P25GR)

G2. PDD267-2008 Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan - Ward 6 (File P26S51). H. Committee of Adjustment Reports I1. PDD268-2008 Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Property –

63 Mill Street South – Ward 4 (File G33 LA). I2. PDD269-2008 Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Property

– 7615 Creditview Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA). J1. PDD270-2008 Exemption from Parking Requirements for Commercial

Development in Downtown Brampton – Wards 1, 3, 4 and 5 (File P03 PA)

J2. PDD271-2008 Proposed Parkland Dedication/Cash in Lieu of Parkland

Dedication - By-law Review (File P81) K. Engineering and Development Services Reports

L1. PDD272-2008 Minutes – Brampton Heritage Board – November 18, 2008 PDD273-2008 M. Other/New Business/Unfinished Business N1. PDD274-2008 List of Referred Matters – Planning, Design and

Development Committee N2. PDD275-2008 Recommendation PDD237-2008 – Issues Related to

Corridor Protection and Employment Targets in the Bram West Secondary Plan – Ward 6 (File P26SP-40)

O. Deferred Matters P. Notice of Motion Q1. PDD276-2008 Resolution – Etobicoke Creek Headwaters Subwatershed

Study Synthesis Report (File N75).


2008 12 01 of 33

Q2. PDD277-2008 Resolution 2008-1189 - Health Assessment Tool Initiative to Provide Quantifiable Comment on Neighbourhood Development Proposals (File N 75)

Q3. PDD278-2008 Resolution GC-0792-2008 - Metrolinx Draft Regional

Transportation Plan and Draft Investment Strategy (File N75)

Q. Notice of Motion R. Question Period S. Public Question Period T. Closed Session U. PDD279-2008 Adjournment

_ _ Regional Councillor P. Palleschi, Chair


2008 12 01 of 33

A. Approval of the Agenda

PDD260-2008 That the agenda for the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008 be approved, as amended as follows:

To add the following:

Re: Item E1/F1 – add page F1-18A to report.

Re: Item E2/F2 - Delegation #5. Fred Snell, 1 Rosegarden Drive, Brampton

Carried B. Conflicts of Interest

C. Consent

The following items listed with an asterisk (*) were considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Committee and were approved at one time.

(G1, G2, I1, I2, J1, J2, L1, N1, Q1, Q2, Q3)

D. Statutory Public Meeting Reports D 1. Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager, Development Services, and M.

Gervais, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – KLM Planning Partners Inc. – 1624882 Ontario Inc. – West of Chinguacousy Road and south of Queen Street West – Ward 6 (File C03W05.012).

No members of the public indicated a wish to address Committee on this

matter.

PDD261-2008 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager, Development Services, and M. Gervais, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated December 1, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – KLM Planning Partners Inc. – 1624882 Ontario Inc. – West of Chinguacousy Road and south of Queen Street West – Ward 6 (File C03W05.012) be received; and,


2008 12 01 of 33

2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation, subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.

Carried D 2. Report from P. Snape, Manager, Development Services, and C. LaRota,

Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 3, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law – Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc. - Amaral Eduardo – 1453 Queen Street West – South of Queen Street and East of Creditview Road – Ward 6 (File C03W05.014).

No members of the public indicated a wish to address Committee on this

matter. PD262-2008 1. That the report from P. Snape, Manager, Development

Services, and C. LaRota, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 3, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law – Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc. - Amaral Eduardo – 1453 Queen Street West – South of Queen Street and East of Creditview Road – Ward 6 (File C03W05.014) be received; and,

2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and

Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation, subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.

Carried

D 3. Report from D. Kraszewski, Manager, Development Services, and T. Theocharides, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law – Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc. – Chacon Properties – 3042 Mayfield Road – North side of Mayfield Road – East of Hurontario Street - Ward 2 (File C01E18.015).


2008 12 01 of 33

Members of the public requested a presentation on this item.

Brian Sutherland, Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc. provided details of the proposal to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a commercial building with a drive-thru restaurant. Three concept plans have been submitted with details of the framework for the proposed uses and the common components of the building floor area. Several studies were submitted in support of the proposal. Mr. Sutherland indicated that the applicant have met with the residents in the neighbourhood and there was no indication of any objections to the proposal. Toula Theocharides, Development Planner, provided details of the current land use designation and confirmed that the proposal is consistent with the uses identified in the Official Plan, however an amendment to the area Secondary Plan and the Zoning By-law is required to facilitate the proposal. She confirmed that the applicant has submitted several studies in support of the proposal which is still under review and will be considered by staff in a future recommendation report to Committee.

Mike Mercure, 68 Twin Willow Crescent, Brampton, noted his objection to

the subject proposal. He stated that a business such as Starbucks is not needed at that site given the presence of similar uses already in the area. He felt that a drive-thru at that site is inappropriate, because of the impact on the existing traffic and the safety of those who would be using the plaza. He was of the opinion that a use such as a gym, bakery, doctor’s office or a liquor store would be more suitable for the site.

Staff confirmed that all comments provided at this meeting will be addressed

in the recommendation report which will be presented to Committee at a future date.

PDD263-2008 1. That the report from D. Kraszewski, Manager, Development

Services, and T. Theocharides, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated December 1, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law – Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc. – Chacon Properties – 3042 Mayfield Road – North side of Mayfield Road – East of Hurontario Street - Ward 2 (File C01E18.015) be received; and,


2008 12 01 of 33

2. That staff be directed to report back to Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the Public Meeting and a staff recommendation, subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.

Carried E. Delegations/Presentations

E. 1. Delegations, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law - IBI Group (Ros Sal Developments Inc.) - 190 Clark Boulevard - North side of Clark Boulevard, west of Lisa Street - Ward 3 (File C03E04.021) (See Item F1).

1. Roxanne Rutter, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 702 2. Kenny Williamson, 4 Lisa Street, Unite 510 3. Monica Grimaldo, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 1107 4. Elizabeth Kalka, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 903 5. Jay Claggett, IBI Group, on behalf of Preston Group

Kenny Williamson, 4 Lisa Street, Unite 510, was not in attendance at the meeting.

Item F1 was brought forward and dealt with at this time. The Chair noted that under Approval of Agenda page F1-18A was added to the staff report.

Roxanne Rutter, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 702, Brampton, advised that she is a resident and member of the Board of Directors of 4 Lisa Street. She was of the opinion that the subject proposal would overpopulate the area, create additional traffic congestion, reduce the quality of life and the value of existing properties in the area. She expressed concerns about residents’ safety and the potential for criminal activities when too many people are housed in such a small area. She was also concerned about structural changes to the parking garage and potential damage to the existing property, the position of the driveway which is a short distance from Lisa Street and the entrance location of the parking lot which is in close proximity to a children’s play area. Ms. Rutter gave a presentation which included photographs of the proposed site and the surrounding areas in support of her comments.


2008 12 01 of 33

James Welch, 4 Lisa Street, Brampton, requested permission to address Committee on behalf of Kenny Williamson, 4 Lisa Street, Unite 510, who was unable to attend the meeting. He advised that he is the vice president of the Board of Directors and that he was addressing Committee on behalf of many of the residents of 4 Lisa Street. He was of the opinion that too many buildings of the size being proposed will cause structural damage as the site is not designed for the type of density and congestion that is being recommended by staff. He was concerned about the safety of the children in the play area, the impact on the environment, given that there will be more idling cars in the area, the quality of life and the potential increase on crimes if the subject proposal is approved. Monica Grimaldo, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 1107, Brampton, was concerned about the violence and crime and was of the opinion that this proposal would increase criminal activity in the area. She felt that the proposal would create an ‘environmental hazard’ for the existing residents and the many animals that are living around the building. She was concerned about the density and traffic congestion and the impact of the proposal on the quality of life of the existing residents. Elizabeth Kalka, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 903, Brampton, was of the opinion that the proposal will be ‘detrimental’ to the residents of 4 Lisa Street. She was concerned about crime and safety and the impact of the proposal on the environment and the health of residents. She questioned where the additional children that the proposal will bring would attend school since most schools in the area are overcrowded, and expressed concerns about the lack of daycare for younger children.

Jay Claggett, IBI Group, on behalf of the applicant, requested approval of the staff recommendations. He stated that he has worked with staff since June 2008 to address the issues and concerns raised by the residents. All the appropriate technical studies were submitted as required. The proposed density is consistent with the City’s Official Plan, represents good land use planning, is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and is within close proximity to Bramalea City Centre.

There was discussion with respect to the following comments and concerns raised by the delegations: o intensification and public safety, the number of apartment buildings/

condominiums in the area from Clark Boulevard to Bramalea Road and the view that the area has the highest crime rate in the City due to the existing density

o clarification on the provincial growth target with respect to the number of units per hectare in high growth areas

o the impact on residents of having the number of parking spaces both for residents and visitors reduced


2008 12 01 of 33

o concerns about shadow impacts and blocked views still remain o comments that the applicant has addressed the concerns previously

expressed by the residents and staff have made the appropriate modifications in the recommendation

o any remaining issues can be discussed with staff and be addressed through the site plan approval process

o crime and safety issues will be addressed through a safety program with the Peel Regional Police that deals with high rise residential development

o approval of this proposal would be regarded as setting a precedent for similar proposals in other densely populated areas of the City

o whether residents had the opportunity to review the report which highlights the changes made to the previous recommendation that was presented to Committee

A motion was put forward to refer the staff report to the Planning, Design and Development meeting of January 12, 2008 to allow the residents the opportunity to review the staff report in light of all the concerns raised at the meeting.

Staff provided clarification that residents were notified that the report was coming forward to this meeting and they had the option to request copies of the report. Residents were advised that they still have an opportunity to express their concerns at the Council Meeting on December 10, 2008, when the recommendations to the staff report will be presented for approval.

Further discussion took place on the referral motion. It was suggested that a

referral at this time will not change the outcome of the staff recommendations and therefore will not provide the results the residents would like which is Committee’s refusal of the proposal.

A vote was taken on the referral motion and was lost. The following motion was considered: PDD264-2008 1. That the report from A. Taranu, Manager of Public Buildings,

D. Kraszewski, Manager of Development Services, and B. Steiger, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated October 12, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December

1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law - IBI Group (Ros Sal Developments Inc.) - 190 Clark Boulevard - North side of Clark Boulevard, west of Lisa Street - Ward 3 (File C03E04.021) be received; and


2008 12 01 of 33

2. That the subject application be approved and staff be directed to prepare the appropriate documents for Consideration by Council;

3. That the implementing zoning by-law amend the “Residential

Apartment A(3) - Section 201” (R4A(3)-Section 201 zone of the subject lands generally in accordance with the following; a) Schedule C – Section 201 shall be deleted; b) Shall permit the following:

1) Two residential apartment buildings (existing

Building A and proposed Building B) on the subject property;

2) A convenience commercial store shall only be

permitted in Building A, and be limited to 85 square metres in size, on the ground floor, within the north-east corner of the building;

3). Purposes accessory to the permitted uses. c) The “Residential Apartment A(3) – Section 201” zone

shall include the lands containing existing building A and proposed building B for the purposes of the zoning by-law provisions.

d) Shall be subject to the following requirements and

restrictions: 1) Maximum Number of Dwelling Units:

i. Building A: 191 dwelling units ii. Building B: 224 dwelling units

2) Minimum Number of Parking Spaces:

1.1 spaces for each dwelling unit;

3). Minimum Number of Visitor Parking Spaces: 0.2 spaces for each dwelling unit;

4) No storage of goods shall be permitted outside

the buildings; 5) No signs or posters other than one indicating

the name of the convenience store and of


2008 12 01 of 33

dimensions not exceeding 0.3 metres by 1.0 metre shall be permitted outside the building;

6) Minimum Lot Area: 32.5 square metres per dwelling unit 7) Minimum Interior Side Yard Depth: 2.0 metres 8) Minimum Rear Yard Depth: 0.0 metres 9) Minimum Exterior Side Yard Depth: 0.0 metres 10) Maximum Lot Coverage: 75% 11) Minimum Landscaped Open Space: 39% 12) Minimum Distance Between Buildings: 18.5 metres 13) Maximum Floor Space Index: 3.0

4. That prior to the enactment of the zoning by-law, the

applicant finalize the Urban Design Brief/Guidelines for subject development, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development and to include the following: • Design principles to ensure an appropriate interface

between the podium wall of the new condominium and adjacent tennis courts for 4 Lisa Street. This shall include provision of vegetation along the wall face to improve aesthetics and soften the appearance of the wall.

• That the podium parking garage façade shall be designed in an integrated manner with the main building, shall use articulation to break up the building mass and use high quality materials.

• In order to provide a buffer from the driveway, parking, underground parking garage entrance and waste collection area to the pool, playground and amenity space of 4 Lisa Street, a decorative solid masonry wall shall be provided along the property line in these areas.


2008 12 01 of 33

5. That prior to the enactment of the implementing Zoning By-law Amendment, the City of Brampton be advised by the School Board(s) that satisfactory arrangements regarding the adequate provision and distribution of educational facilities have been made between the developer/applicant and the School Boards for this plan.

6. That prior to the enactment of the zoning by-law, the

applicant enter into a development agreement with the City, and that the appropriate provisions to address the following be included: a) To address the specific streetscape design of the

main façade (including, but not limited to: access points, commercial signage, patio locations), internal driveway aisles, parking garage layout, loading / servicing bay, and building materials, in accordance with the Development Design Guidelines approved by the City;

b) The owner/ applicant shall agree to deposit

appropriate securities with the City to ensure implementation of these plans in accordance with the City’s site plan approval process,

c) The owner/ applicant shall agree to grant all

necessary easements for drainage, utility and servicing purposes as may be required to the appropriate agency or public authority,

d) The owner/ applicant shall agree to grant all road

widenings as may be required to the appropriate public authority,

e) The owner/ applicant shall agree to pay all applicable

Regional, City and educational development charges in accordance with respective development charges by-laws;

f) The owner/ applicant shall agree to provide cash-in-

lieu of parkland dedication in accordance with City policy,

g) Prior to site plan approval, the applicant shall submit a

Phase 1 (or 2, if required) Environmental Site


2008 12 01 of 33

Assessment to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development Department.

h) Prior to site plan approval the applicant shall submit a

Design Brief outlining landscaping, as well as architectural and design elements of this proposal to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development.

i) The applicant shall also agree to implement the

approved Design Brief. j) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a site

development plan, landscaping grading and storm drainage plan, elevation and cross section drawings, a fire protection plan, and engineering and servicing plans shall be approved by the City, and appropriate securities shall be deposited with the City, to ensure implementation of these plans in accordance with the city’s site plan review process.

k) That prior to the enactment of the implementing

Zoning By-law Amendment, the City of Brampton shall be advised by the School Board(s) that satisfactory arrangements regarding the adequate provision and distribution of educational facilities have been made between the developer/applicant and the School Boards for this plan.

l) The applicant shall agree to erect and maintain

information signs at all major entrances to the proposed development advising the following: “Please be advised that students may be accommodated elsewhere on a temporary basis until suitable permanent pupil places, funded by the Government of Ontario, are available.” These signs shall be to the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board’s specifications, at locations determined by the Board and erected prior to registration.

m) The applicant shall agree to include the following

warning clauses in all offers of purchase and sale of residential lots until the permanent school for the area has been completed.


2008 12 01 of 33

“Whereas, despite the best efforts of the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, sufficient accommodation may not be available for all anticipated students from the area, you are herby notified that students may be accommodated in temporary facilities and/or bussed to a school outside of the neighbourhood, and further, that students may later be transferred to the neighbourhood school.” “That purchasers agree that for the purpose of transportation to school, the residents of the subdivision shall agree that children will meet the bus on roads presently in existence or at another place designated by the board.”

n) The applicant shall agree to erect and maintain signs

at the entrances to the development which shall advise prospective purchasers that due to present facilities, some of the children from the subdivision may have to be accommodated in temporary facilities or bussed to schools, according to the Peel District School Board’s Transportation policy.

o) The applicant shall agree that the following clause be

placed in any agreement of purchase and sale entered into with respect to any lots on this plan, within a period of five years from the date of registration of the subdivision agreement:

“Whereas, despite the best efforts of the Peel District School Board, sufficient accommodation may not be available for all anticipated students in the neighbouring schools, you are herby notified that some students may be accommodated in temporary facilities or bussed to schools outside of the area, according to the Board’s Transportation Policy. You are advised to contact the School Accommodation Department of the Peel District School board to determine the exact Schools.”

p) That prior to site plan approval, satisfactory

arrangements be made with the Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development and the Commissioner of Community Services in consultation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority


2008 12 01 of 33

for the- proposed improvements to Norton Place Park, including:

• A direct connection to the park from the subject

property; • The re-naturalization of the tributary to the

Etobicoke Creek running through the park in the area disturbed by the cut and fill works; and;

• A monetary contribution to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority for the enhancement and re-naturalization of the creek within Norton Place Park and downstream (south of Clark Boulevard)

q) That prior to site plan approval the applicant submits

a preliminary air quality study to ensure that air quality resulting from the adjacent West Drive industries is at approved levels.

r) That prior to site plan approval, the proposed

construction access shall be approved by the Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development;

s) That the owner agrees to include in all purchase and

sale agreements a clause which warns purchasers of the parking reduction from 1.5 spaces per unit and 0.2 visitor parking spaces per unit to 1.1 spaces per unit and 0.2 visitor parking spaces per unit.

t) That prior to site plan approval and prior to initiation of

any site works, the applicant make appropriate arrangements to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Planning, Design and Development with the owners of 4 Lisa Street with respect to relocation and/or reconstruction of mutual or existing cross-services, relocation of stairwell entrance, impacts of changes to garage in terms of sprinkler systems, life safety Fire Route, structural impacts of new easterly parking ramp on wall and air vent as identified in the August 15, 2008 Trow report (Due Diligence Report for 4 Lisa Street and 190 Clark Boulevard New Condo Tower) have been made.


2008 12 01 of 33

u) That prior to site plan approval the applicant and City shall explore the opportunity for the completion of the front yard landscaping and permanent fence along the 4 Lisa Street property as early as possible during the overall redevelopment, and prior to the completion of the proposed new apartment building. Early implementation of the landscaping and fencing will have to be considered in relation to impacts from the ongoing construction on the site and construction timing.

v) That prior to site plan approval, the applicant shall

make appropriate arrangements with the 4 Lisa Street Condominium Board for the removal and replacement of any trees at the rear of the 4 Lisa Street Lands in the vicinity of the proposed building, that will be impacted by the new building construction.

w) That prior to the sale of any units and prior to site plan

approval, the applicant shall submit for approval a Community Information Map to the satisfaction of the City of Brampton that includes the necessary noise, school board accommodation, and other warnings and agree to include all the necessary information as set out in the City’s requirements for Community Information Maps, including that information set out in Appendix 10 of the October 12, 2008 staff report. A reduced version of the map shall be attached to all purchase and sale and lease agreements.

x) The applicant agrees to include all warning clauses

and notes required by the City and those set out in Appendix 10 to the staff recommendation report dated October 12, 2008 in all agreements of offers of purchase and sale to prospective purchasers of dwelling units in the proposed building.

6. That this decision be considered null and void and a new

development application be required, unless a zoning by-law is passed within 36 months of the Council decision.

7. That the following delegations to the Planning, Design and

Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law - IBI Group (Ros Sal Developments Inc.) - 190 Clark Boulevard -


2008 12 01 of 33

North side of Clark Boulevard, west of Lisa Street - Ward 3 (File C03E04.021) be received;

1. Roxanne Rutter, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 702 (and presentation) 2. James Welch, 4 Lisa Street, Unite 510 3. Monica Grimaldo, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 1107 4. Elizabeth Kalka, 4 Lisa Street, Unit 903 5. Jay Claggett, IBI Group, on behalf of Preston Group

Carried

E 2. Delegations, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By- law and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – Candevcon Limited – 1281216 Ontario Inc. – North and south side of Tortoise Court, west side of Goreway Drive, south of the intersection of Countryside Drive and Goreway Drive- Ward 10 (File C07E15.009). (See Item F2). 1. Annmarie Salvalaggio, 4 Tortoise Court, Brampton 2. Bruce Haines, President, Green Visions 3. Peter Orphanos, Chair, Sierra Club Peel Group, Mississauga 4. Diarmuid Horgan/Chris Barnett, on behalf of 1281216, Ontario Inc.

Item F2 was brought forward and dealt with at this time.

Annmarie Salvalaggio, 4 Tortoise Court, Brampton, applauded staff and Committee for listening to the residents and supporting them in their fight against the subject proposal. She was of the opinion that the proposal is not appropriate or compatible with the existing development and features of the community. By refusing the proposal she felt that the City has recognized that measures are required to protect and preserve the natural environment and wildlife, not only with respect to this proposal but throughout the City. Lesley Luxemberger, advised that he was requested by Greens Visions to address Committee. He noted his support for the residents of community in their efforts to preserve the natural environment and their quality of life. The request for preservation of the golf course lands is an appeal by the residents for environmental open space for all residents. The development of the subject lands will compromise the overall community including the schools in the area given the lack of classroom space at Mount Royal public school. Committee must reassure the residents that the subject lands will not be developed for residential purposes.


2008 12 01 of 33

Bruce Haines, President, Green Visions, gave a slide presentation highlighting the impact of the subject proposal on the community and the environment. He stressed the need to protect the natural heritage features of the Castlemore Golf Course lands and enhance and improve this important local community diverse ecosystem. Images of the pond locations, creeks, the proposed development, view of the golf course lands, vegetation and wildlife habitat including turtles and fish were shown and which would all be at risk if the proposal was approved. A copy of his presentation was circulated to Committee.

Peter Orphanos, Chair, Sierra Club Peel Group, Mississauga, complimented staff on the comprehensiveness of the report and for recognizing the rights of the residents and taking the appropriate measures to preserve the natural environment and their quality of life. He agreed that Brampton is a fast growing community and supports good planning with reasonable intensification. However, preserving existing greenspace is essential to balance subdivisions and is consistent with the Places to Grow Act which requires that growth should be directed away from recreational and sensitive lands.

Chris Barnett, on behalf of 1281216 Ontario Inc., advised that Diarmuid Horgan will not be addressing Committee. Mr. Barnett provided a submission to Committee which included correspondence to planning staff on a peer review environmental impact study and comments from Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA). He noted his disappointment with the staff recommendation to refuse the subject proposal. He stated that following discussions with staff regarding the concerns expressed by the residents at the public meeting, modifications were made to the proposed plan as presented in order to achieve compatibility with the existing community. He informed Committee that as of the end of last week, all the technical issues were addressed, all the required studies were submitted and questioned why staff was recommending refusal of the proposal. He noted that the last page of his submission contains a summary of the ‘net –environmental gain’ for potential home buyers with respect to the layout of the subdivision, housing types and golf course features. He reminded Committee that the application is currently before the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and that a Prehearing Conference is scheduled for January 16, 2009. He requested that Committee direct staff to support the application. Fred Snell, 1 Rosegarden Drive, Brampton, was concerned about the impact of the subject proposal on the natural habitat and wildlife in the ponds and streams in the surrounding lands. He does not support the proposed development. He requested that the area not be altered in any way as it is


2008 12 01 of 33

home to an abundance of wildlife such as turtles, frogs, ducks, deer and fish. He was concerned about the impact of the development on the water table as he believes that water is diverted elsewhere to accommodate development and this will create an overflow on residents north of Countryside Drive. He was also concerned about overcrowding in the area schools.

There was discussion with respect to the comments in the Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) correspondence in Mr. Barnett’s submission dated March 7, 2008 and the TRCA correspondence in the staff report dated September 15, 2008 advising that the subject application was premature at this time. Mr. Barnett indicated that his client has since provided the required documents to staff and TRCA. Staff provided clarification with respect to a previous report that was presented to Committee on May 7, 2007. Staff explained that it was an information report and residents attended the meeting and provided comments. The decision to refuse the application is based on a thorough planning analysis by staff. Staff confirmed that if a revised plan is submitted during the OMB process, staff will report back to Committee. A recorded vote was requested in support of the staff recommendation as follows:

Yea Nay Absent Miles Hames Moore Gibson Mayor Fennell Palleschi Hutton Sprovieri Dhillon Sanderson Callahan Carried 11 Yeas 0 Nay 0 Absent


2008 12 01 of 33

The following motion was considered: PDD265-2008 1. That the report from K. Ash, Manager of Development

Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – Candevcon Limited – 1281216 Ontario Inc. – North and south side of Tortoise Court, west side of Goreway Drive, south of the intersection of Countryside Drive and Goreway Drive- Ward 10 (File C07E15.009) be received; and

2. That the following delegations and submissions to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – Candevcon Limited – 1281216 Ontario Inc. – North and south side of Tortoise Court, west side of Goreway Drive, south of the intersection of Countryside Drive and Goreway Drive- Ward 10 (File C07E15.009) be received: 1. Annmarie Salvalaggio, 4 Tortoise Court, Brampton

2. Bruce Haines, President, Green Visions and (submission) 3. Peter Orphanos, Chair, Sierra Club Peel Group, Mississauga

4. Chris Barnett, on behalf of 1281216, Ontario Inc. (and submission)

5. Lesley Luxemberger, on behalf of Green Visions 6. Fred Snell, 1 Rosegarden Drive, Brampton; and

3. That the subject application be refused. Carried F. Development Team Reports F 1. Report from A. Taranu, Manager of Public Buildings, D. Kraszewski, Manager

of Development Services, and B. Steiger, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated October 12, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law - IBI Group (Ros Sal Developments Inc.) - 190 Clark Boulevard - North side of Clark Boulevard, west of Lisa Street - Ward 3 (File C03E04.021) (See Delegation E1).

Dealt with under Item E1, Recommendation PDD264-2008


2008 12 01 of 33

F 2. Report from K. Ash, Manager of Development Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated December 1, 2008, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision – Candevcon Limited – 1281216 Ontario Inc. – North and south side of Tortoise Court, west side of Goreway Drive, south of the intersection of Countryside Drive and Goreway Drive- Ward 10 (File C07E15.009) (See Delegation E2).

Dealt with under Item E2, Recommendation PDD265-2008 G. Policy Planning Reports * G 1. Report from J. Given, Manager, Growth Management and Special Policy,

and M. Vaughan, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 21, 2008, re: 2008 Development Allocation Update – Managing the Rate, Direction and Quality of Growth in Brampton (File P25GR).

PDD266-2008 1. That the report from J. Given, Manager, Growth

Management and Special Policy, and M. Vaughan, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 21, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: 2008 Development Allocation Update – Managing the Rate, Direction and Quality of Growth in Brampton (File P25GR) be received; and,

2. That applications C09E08.016 (121 units), C108.002 (183

units), C01W02.015 (112 units), and C08E16.004 (10 units) totaling 426 units become additional allocated capacity under the 2008 Development Allocation in accordance with Section 4.11.2.2 of the Official Plan.

Carried * G 2. Report from N. Grady, Planning Project Manager, Planning, Design and

Development dated November 28, 2008, re: Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan - Ward 6 (File P26S51).

PDD267-2008 1. That the report from N. Grady, Planning Project Manager,

Planning, Design and Development dated November 28, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee


2008 12 01 of 33

Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan - Ward 6 (File P26S51) be received; and

2. That if deemed necessary by the Commissioner of the

Planning, Design and Development Department, staff will report back to obtain direction from City Council on the Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan Subwatershed Study;

3. That Block Plan Sub-Area 51-1 in the Mount Pleasant

Secondary Plan as shown on Figure 3 of the subject report be recognized as the first block plan for processing;

4. That a streamlined block planning process as outlined in this

report shall be implemented as part of the Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan planning program;

5. That if the Commissioner of Planning, Design and

Development Department, the Commissioner of the Works and Transportation Department and the City Solicitor, in consultation with other agencies, are satisfied with the final modified block planning process recommended in the Official Plan Amendment implementing the Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan, then staff be directed to report on the results of the modified block planning process for Mount Pleasant and implementation of a modified block planning process on a City-wide basis; and,

6. That provided the Commissioner of the Planning Design and Development Department, the Commissioner of the Works and Transportation Department and the City Solicitor are satisfied with respect to: (a) the ongoing clearance of various City Council approved conditions and requirements of final approval; and, (b) an approach to facilitate the funding of appropriate infrastructure, including delivery of transit infrastructure at the earliest stage practicable then, staff be directed to proceed with the final (Stage 2) block plan and draft plan approval of the Mount Pleasant Village Mobility Hub, including the potential for translating block plan requirements and conditions into conditions of subdivision approval.

Carried

H. Committee of Adjustment Reports - nil


2008 12 01 of 33

I. Building and Zoning Reports

* I 1. Report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief Building Official, and A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development,

dated October 28, 2008, re: Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Property – 63 Mill Street South – Ward 4 (File G33 LA).

PDD268-2008 1. That the report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief

Building Official, and A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, dated October 28, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Property – 63 Mill Street South – Ward 4 (File G33 LA) be received; and

2. That the application for a permit to demolish the properties

located at 63 Mill Street South be approved subject to standard permit conditions; and,

3. That Peel Regional Police be advised of the issuance of a

permit for the property.

Carried

* I 2. Report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief Building Official, and A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development,

dated November 6, 2008, re: Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Property – 7615 Creditview Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA).

PDD269-2008 1. That the report from B. Campbell, Director of Building and Chief

Building Official, and A. Magnone, Regulatory Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 6, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Application for a Permit to Demolish a Residential Property – 7615 Creditview Road – Ward 6 (File G33 LA) bre received; and

2. That the application for a permit to demolish the properties

located at 7615 Creditview Road be approved subject to standard permit conditions; and,

3. That Peel Regional Police be advised of the issuance of a

permit for the property.

Carried


2008 12 01 of 33

J. Community Design - Parks Planning and Development Reports * J 1. Report from A. Taranu, Manager, Public Buildings, and D. Vanderburg,

Central Area Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 4, 2008, re: Exemption from Parking Requirements for Commercial Development in Downtown Brampton – Wards 1, 3, 4 and 5 (File P03 PA).

PDD270-2008 1. That the report from A. Taranu, Manager, Public Buildings,

and D. Vanderburg, Central Area Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 4, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Exemption from Parking Requirements for Commercial Development in Downtown Brampton – Wards 1, 3, 4 and 5 (File P03 PA) be received; and

2. That the temporary Downtown parking exemption be approved

for a further period of twelve months and that a corresponding by-law be enacted as set out in Appendix 2 to the staff report.

Carried * J 2. Report from J. Spencer, Manager, Parks and Facility Planning, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 24, 2008, re: Proposed Parkland

Dedication/Cash in Lieu of Parkland Dedication - By-law Review (File P81)

PDD271-2008 1. That the report from J. Spencer, Manager, Parks and Facility

Planning, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 24, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Proposed Parkland Dedication/Cash in Lieu of Parkland Dedication - By-law Review (File P81) be received; and,

2. That in recognition of the need to update the current Parkland

Dedication By-law (No. 41-2000 as amended), staff be directed to initiate a formal review in accordance with the phased work plan presented in the subject report.

Carried K. Engineering and Development Services Reports - nil


2008 12 01 of 33

L. Minutes L 1. Brampton Heritage Board – November 18, 2008

A motion was put forward that Recommendation HB142-2008 be extracted from the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, and referred back to staff for further consideration.

The following motion was considered: PDD272-2008 That Recommendation HB142-2008 as follows be referred back to

staff pending completion of negotiations on heritage mitigation between senior staff and the landowner of the subject property; and,

That staff be directed to report back in a timely manner to Planning, Design and Development Committee and Council on the scope of any proposed mitigation plan and the progress of negotiations:

. “HB142-2008 1. That the following delegations on behalf of

Orlando Corporation, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: Heritage Impact Assessment for “Beatty Farmhouse” – 2377 Steeles Avenue West, a Category “B” Property on the City of Brampton Register of Cultural Heritage Resources – Ward 6 (File G33) be received: 1. Mr. Carl Brawley, Associate, Glenn

Schnarr & Associates (GSAI) 2. Mr. David Eckler, Principal, Architects

Rasch Eckler (AREA); and, “2. That Orlando Corporation be requested to

undertake the following: • Preserve the Beatty Farmhouse intact

until the Board formalizes its position on the property

• Work with City staff in the investigation of all options for re-use, relocation, to include the possibility of commercial uses of the farmhouse in its current location


2008 12 01 of 33

• Report back to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of February 17, 2009; and,

“3. That the Heritage Impact Assessment

prepared for Orlando Corporation by Architects Rasch Eckler Associates Ltd., dated September 8, 2008, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: “Beatty Farmhouse” – 2377 Steeles Avenue West, a Category “B” Property on the City of Brampton Register of Cultural Heritage Resources – Ward 6 (File G33) be deferred to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of February 17, 2009.”

Carried

PDD273-2008 That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of

November 18, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, Recommendations HB139-2008 to HB152-2008, be approved as amended to delete Recommendation HB142-2008 as it was dealt with under Recommendation PDD 271-2008.

Carried HB139-2008 That the agenda for the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of

November 18, 2008 be approved as amended as follows: To add: L 2. Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources

Listing Candidate Summary Report – St. Bartholomew’s United Church – 22 Abbey Road (Peel Village) – Ward 3 (File G33); and,

L 3. Discussion at the request of Mr. Michael Avis, Board

Member, re: Process for Heritage Impact Assessments (File G33); and,


2008 12 01 of 33

L 4. Discussion re: Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of December 16, 2008 (File G33).

HB140-2008 That the Minutes of the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of

October 21, 2008, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, be received.

HB141-2008 1. That the following delegations, to the Brampton Heritage

Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: Humber River Bridge Inventory (File G33) be received: 1. Ms. Susan Robertson, Project Manager, Humber

Watershed, Toronto and Region Conservation 2. Mr. Robert Hulley, President, Credit and Humber

Watershed Branch, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario; and,

2. That the written report from Ms. Susan Robertson, Project

Manager, Humber Watershed, Toronto and Region Conservation, dated November 18, 2008, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: Humber River Bridge Inventory (File G33) be received; and,

3. That the Brampton Heritage Board recognizes the

significance of a bridge inventory to the Humber River Watershed Canadian Heritage River System designation; and,

4. That the Board generally supports the work of the Humber

Watershed Alliance in this initiative; and, 5. That a letter of support be provided by the Board to assist

with a grant application on behalf of this project to the Humber Watershed Alliance; and,

6. That assistance be provided by the Board to the Humber

Watershed Alliance by providing resources and information relevant to the secondary data collection process however possible.

HB142-2008 (Dealt with under Recommendation PDD271-2008)


2008 12 01 of 33

HB143-2008 1. That the Minutes of the Heritage Resources Sub-Committee Meeting of November 4, 2008 (File G33), to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, be received; and,

2. That the Brampton Heritage Board work with William Osler

Health Centre in providing input on the future use of Peel Memorial Hospital artifacts in the redeveloped Peel Memorial Hospital.

HB144-2008 That the Minutes of the Outreach and Marketing Sub-

Committee Meeting of October 29, 2008 (File G33), to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, be received.

HB145-2008 That the report from Mr. Larry Giles, Brampton Heritage Board

Member on the Humber Watershed Alliance, undated, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: Humber Watershed Alliance Meeting of October 21, 2008 and Heritage Sub-Committee Meeting of November 13, 2008 (File G33) be received.

HB146-2008 Whereas, at its meeting of September 16, 2008, the Brampton

Heritage Board considered a Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by AREA (Architects Rasch Eckler Associates Ltd.) for G.C. Jain Investments Limited, dated June 30, 2008, re: O’Reilly-Kennedy House – 7905 Mayfield Road, a Category “B” Property on the City of Brampton Register of Cultural Heritage Resources – Ward 10 (File G33); and,

Whereas on November 2, 2008 the Brampton Heritage Board

undertook a tour of the subject property and made observations on its current condition; and,

Whereas, at its meeting of November 18, 2008, the Board

acknowledged that the subject property is in an advanced state of decay, that in the Board’s view it would not survive relocation, and considered the impact of future road widening on the property;

Therefore Be It Resolved that the Brampton Heritage Board does

not oppose demolition of the subject property; and,


2008 12 01 of 33

Be It Resolved that the subject property be removed from the list of proposed heritage designations; and,

Be It Resolved that the property owners be requested to work with

City staff with respect to retention and storage of all salvageable materials on site until they can be retrieved for future suitable use.

HB147-2008 Whereas, at its meeting of November 18, 2008, the Brampton

Heritage Board gave consideration to the heritage worthiness of Fitzpatrick Log Cabin – McVean Drive and Castlemore Road – Ward 10; and,

Whereas at that time, the Board acknowledged that the

appropriate heritage exercise has been undertaken for the subject property and that the property is in an advanced state of decay;

Therefore Be It Resolved that the Brampton Heritage Board does

not oppose demolition of the subject property; and, Be It Resolved that the subject property be removed from the list

of proposed heritage designations; and, Be It Resolved that the property owners be requested to work with

City staff with respect to retention of all salvageable materials and the identification of a suitable recipient for the salvaged materials.

HB148-2008 That the correspondence from Regional Councillor E. Moore,

Wards 1 and 5, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: Brampton Heritage Board’s “Heritage Times” Newsletter – Fall 2008 (File G33) be received.

HB149-2008 1. That the report and memorandum from A. Minichillo,

Heritage Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 2008, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation – Fendley Greenhouses – 20 Murray Street – Ward 5 (File G33) be received; and,

2. That the subject property be endorsed for heritage

designation; and,


2008 12 01 of 33

3. That the Heritage Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, be directed to proceed with the next steps for heritage designation of the subject property.

HB150-2008 1. That the City of Brampton Register of Heritage Resources

Listing Candidate Summary Report from J. Leonard, Heritage Coordinator, Planning, Design and Development, dated November 3, 2008, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of November 18, 2008, re: St. Bartholomew’s United Church – 22 Abbey Road (Peel Village) – Ward 3 (File G33) be received; and,

2. That the subject property be endorsed for listing on the City

of Brampton Register of Heritage Resources. HB151-2008 That the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of December 16, 2008,

be cancelled. HB152-2008 That the Brampton Heritage Board do now adjourn to meet again

on Tuesday, January 20, 2009. Carried M. Other/New Business/Unfinished Business - nil N. Referred Matters * N 1. List of Referred Reports – Planning, Design and Development

Committee. PDD274-2009 That the List of Referred Reports – Planning, Design and

Development Committee to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008 (File P45GE) be received.

Carried N 2. Correspondence re: Recommendation PDD237-2008 – Issues Related

to Corridor Protection and Employment Targets in the Bram West Secondary Plan – Ward 6 (File P26SP-40)


2008 12 01 of 33

• From Mr. Jason Park, Lawyer, Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP, on behalf of 1212949 Ontario Inc., Lorwood Holdings Inc. and Raymond and James Ferri, dated November 11, 2008

• From Mr. Jason Park, Lawyer, Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP, on behalf of Ivy Manor Estates Inc., dated November 11, 2008

PDD275-2008 That the following correspondence to the Planning, Design and

Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Recommendation PDD237-2008 – Issues Related to Corridor Protection and Employment Targets in the Bram West Secondary Plan – Ward 6 (File P26SP-40) be deferred to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of January 12, 2009: • From Mr. Jason Park, Lawyer, Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP, on

behalf of 1212949 Ontario Inc., Lorwood Holdings Inc. and Raymond and James Ferri, dated November 11, 2008

• From Mr. Jason Park, Lawyer, Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP, on behalf of Ivy Manor Estates Inc., dated November 11, 2008.

Carried O. Deferred Matters - nil P. Notice of Motion - nil Q. Correspondence * Q 1. Correspondence from the Toronto and Region Conservation dated

October 28, 2008, re: Resolution – Etobicoke Creek Headwaters Subwatershed Study Synthesis Report (File N75).

PDD276-2008 That the correspondence from the Toronto and Region Conservation

dated October 28, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Resolution – Etobicoke Creek Headwaters Subwatershed Study Synthesis Report (File N75) be received; and

That staff be directed to prepare a report to a future Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting on this matter.

Carried


2008 12 01 of 33

* Q 2. Correspondence from the Region of Peel dated November 18, 2008, re: Resolution 2008-1189 - Health Assessment Tool Initiative to Provide Quantifiable Comment on Neighbourhood Development Proposals

(File N 75). PDD277-2008 That the correspondence from the Region of Peel dated November

18, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Resolution 2008-1189 - Health Assessment Tool Initiative to Provide Quantifiable Comment on Neighbourhood Development Proposals (File N 75) be received.

Carried * Q 3. Correspondence from the City of Mississauga, dated November 13, 2008,

re: Resolution GC-0792-2008 - Metrolinx Draft Regional Transportation Plan and Draft Investment Strategy (File N75).

PDD278-2008 That the correspondence from the City of Mississauga, dated

November 13, 2008, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of December 1, 2008, re: Resolution GC-0792-2008 - Metrolinx Draft Regional Transportation Plan and Draft Investment Strategy (File N75) received.

Carried R. Councillors Question Period S. Public Question Period T. Closed Session - nil

U. Adjournment

PDD279-2008 That the Planning, Design and Development Committee do now

adjourn to meet again on Monday, January 12, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. or at the call of the Chair.

Carried

december 1, 2008 - brampton...december 1, 2008, re: application to amend the zoning by-law and...

Documents