december 2003csa3050: natural language generation 1 what is natural language generation? when is nlg...
TRANSCRIPT
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
1
CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
What is Natural Language Generation?When is NLG an Appropriate Technology?NLG System Architectures
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
2
Acknowledgements & Resources
• Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale, Building Natural Language Generation Systems, Cambridge:2000.
• SIGGEN's resource page www.dynamicmultimedia.com.au/siggen/
• Dale & Reiter's ANLP-97 Tutorial on Building Applied Natural Language Generation Systems
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
3
Meaning
Text
Natural Language
Understanding
Text
Natural Language
Generation
NLP = NLU + NLG
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
4
What is NLG?• NLG "is the process of deliberately constructing
a natural language text in order to meet specified communicative goals". [McDonald 1992]
• Goal: design of computer software which produces understandable NL utterances.
• Input: some underlying non-linguistic representation of information
• Output: documents, reports, explanations, help messages, and other kinds of texts
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
5
Why Use NLG?
• Important information is often stored on computers in ways which are not comprehensible to the end user:
• NLG systems can present this information to users in an accessible way.
• When output is so variable that is difficult to capture by means of canned text.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
6
Are NLG and NLU Mirror Images?
• Both Require Knowledge
– knowledge of language
– knowledge of the domain
• Can we use same knowledge to drive NLG and NLU?
• Reversible grammars
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
7
Reversible Grammars are Possible
s --> np, vp.np --> n.vp --> v, np.
n --> [john].n --> [mary].v --> [loves].v --> [hits].
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
8
Reversible Grammar - Output
1 ?- s([john,loves,mary],[]).Yes2 ?- s(X,[]).X = [john, loves, john] ;X = [john, loves, mary] ;X = [john, hits, john] ;X = [john, hits, mary] ;X = [mary, loves, john] ;X = [mary, loves, mary] ;X = [mary, hits, john] ;X = [mary, hits, mary] ;No
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
9
But NLU and NLG AddressFundamentally Different Problems
• NLU– Management of
choices about interpretation.
– Handling ill-formed input.
• NLG– Management of
choices about realisation, given that you know what you want to say.
– Stylistically appropriate output.
– Creating understandable output.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
10
Deciding what to say involves consideration of ....
• what the content of an utterance should be• what information should be omitted;• how to organise that content in a coherent
discourse;• what tone or degree of formality should be
adopted;• how the material should be broken down into
sentences or clauses;• what syntactic constructions should be used;• how entities should be described;• word choice.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
11
Examples of Choices
"This course is being taught by Mike Rosner. It is an introduction to natural language generation".
• lecturers name and course title.• style of name• two sentences rather than one.• passive rather than active for first sentence• being taught rather than being given• pronoun it in the second sentence
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
12
Criteria of Understandability/Quality
1. Clear meaning, good grammar, terminology and sentence structure.
2. Clear meaning but bad grammar, bad terminology, or bad sentence structure.
3. Meaning graspable but ambiguities due to bad terminology or bad sentence structure
4. Meaning unclear but inferrable5. Meaning absolutely unclear
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
13
Examples of Understandability/Quality
1. The US unilaterally reduced China's textile export quotas.
2. US cutted china export ration lonely.
3. A chinese ration US cut it down.
4. Cause states go quotas to reduced.
5. alone cut it up rations alone
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
14
When are NLG Techniques Desirable?
• Necessary source data available in a computationally tractable form.
• Much variation in output is required.
• Automation justified on the basis of volume, speed requirements or consistency requirements.
• Text is the right medium.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
15
Alternatives to/Variations of Natural Language Generation
• Alternatives– Fixed Templates– Templates with Variables– Graphics.– Manual NLG
• Variations– Multi-Modal– Dialogue
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
16
Choice of Text v. Graphics
• No hard and fast rules.• Examination of existing conventions in a
given area of application is useful.• Can depend on type of subject matter, e.g.
– Information about physical location often better conveyed by graphics.
– Information about abstract concepts better conveyed by text.
• Expertise and language abilities of user.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
17
WIP: Knowledge Based Presentation of Information
• WIP (Wahlster et al c.1990)• Multimodal • Presentation system that is able to generate a variety of
multimedia documents• Input consisting of a formal description of the
communicative intent of a planned presentation.• generation process is controlled by a set of generation
parameters – target group– presentation objective– resource limitation – target language.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
18
Typical Pipelined Architecture
Text Planning
Sentence Planning
Linguistic Realization
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
19
Tasks and Architecture in NLG
1. Content determination2. Discourse planning (≈ paragraphs)
3. Sentence aggregation4. Lexicalisation
5. Referring expression generation6. Syntax + morphology7. Orthographic realization
Text Planning
Sentence Planning
Linguistic Realizatio
n
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
20
Intermediate Representations
Text Planning
Sentence Planning
Linguistic Realizatio
n
Text Plan
Sentence Plans
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
21
1. Content Determination
• The process of deciding what to say from communicative goals etc.
• construction of a set of messages from the underlying data source– Messages are aggregations of data that are
appropriate for linguistic expression.– Each message may correspond to the
meaning of a word or a phrase.– Messages are based on domain entities,
concepts, and relations.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
22
Examples of Messages
• DEPARTURETIME(CALEXPRESS, 1000).
• ID(NEXTTRAIN, CALEXPRESS)
• COUNT((TRAIN, SRC(ABERDEEN),
DESTINATION(GLASGOW)), 20, PERDAY)
• The Caledonian Express leaves at 10am
• The next train is the Caledonian Express
• There are 20 trains daily from Aberdeen to Glasgow
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
23
2. Discourse Planning
• A text is not just a random collection of sentences
The Caledonian Express leaves at 10am.The next train is the Caledonian Express.There are 20 trains daily from Aberdeen to Glasgow
• Texts have an underlying structure in which the parts are related together
• The structure can be expressed by means of a text plan
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
24
A Text Plan
NextTrainInformation
IDENTITY(…) DEPARTURETIME(…)
COUNT(…)
Sequence
Elaboration
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
25
Text Resulting from Text Plan
There are 20 trains daily from Aberdeen to Glasgow.The next train is the Caledonian Express.It leaves Aberdeen at 10am.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
26
3. Sentence Planning:Aggregation
• A one-to-one mapping from messages to sentences results in disfluent text
• Messages need to be combined to produce larger and more complex sentences
• The result is a sentence specification or SENTENCE PLAN
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
27
An Example of Sentence Aggregation
• Without aggregation:– The next train is the Caledonian Express. It leaves Aberdeen at 10am.
• With aggregation:– The next train, which leaves at 10am, is the Caledonian Express.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
28
4 Lexicalisation
• Lexicalisation determines the particular words to be used to express domain concepts and relations
• In our example, should the DEPARTURETIME relation be expressed using the verb leave or depart?
• How do we express different nuances of meaning?
• What words should be used in different languages?
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
29
5 Referring Expression Generation
• Referring expression generation is concerned with how we describe domain entities in such a way that the hearer will know what we are talking about.
• Choice between– Proper names (type/degree of formality)– Definite Descriptions– Pronouns
• Major issue is avoiding ambiguity.John hit Bill. He cried out.
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
30
6 Syntactic and Morphological Realization
• Morphology: rules of word formation: – walk + ed = walked
• Syntax: rules of sentence formation– the subject goes before the verb
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
31
7 Orthographic Realization
• Orthographic realization is concerned case, punctuation, typographic issues: font size, column width …
• sentences begin with upper case letter, end in full stops
• choice of font
• other layout issues
December 2003 CSA3050: Natural Language Generation
32
Summary• NLG is related to NLU but addresses different
problems.• Quality/understandability is a major issue. • NLG is an option when text is an appropriate
output medium, and when "mail-merge" style character manipulation is insufficient for the application at hand.
• Planning considerations enter into the generation of texts.
• Text generation is a pipeline process involving different representations.