december 2015 bicycle and pedestrian project funding lauren blackburn
TRANSCRIPT
December 2015
Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Funding
Lauren Blackburn
Transportation
NCDOT Project Funding
Available funding sources for bike/pedestrian projects:
• STI (Federal) – Independent projects
• Complete street (independent) accommodations
2
Transportation
Strategic Transportation Investment (STI)
House Bill 817 signed into Law June 26, 2013
Prioritization Workgroup charged with providing recommendations to NCDOT on weights and criteria
3
Transportation
40% of Funds = $6B 30% of Funds = $4.5B 30% of Funds = $4.5B
STI
4
Statewide Mobility
Regional Impact
Division Needs
Focus Address Local Needs
Transportation
regions &divisions
Transportation6
Statewide Regional Division
Aviation
Large Commercial Service Airports. Funding not to exceed $500K per airport project per year
Other Commercial Service Airports not in Statewide. Funding not to exceed $300K per airport project per year
All Airports without Commercial Service. Funding not to exceed $18.5M for airports within this category
Bicycle-Pedestrian
N/A N/AFederally funded independent bicycle and pedestrian improvements
Public Transportation
N/A
Service spanning two or more counties and serving more than one municipality. Funding amounts not to exceed 10% of regional allocation.
Service not included on Regional. Multimodal terminals and stations serving passenger transit systems
Ferry N/AState maintained routes, excluding replacement vessels
Replacement of vessels
RailFreight Capacity Service on Class I Railroad Corridors
Rail service spanning two or more counties not included on Statewide
Rail service not included on Statewide or Regional
STI Eligibility Definitions – Non Highways
Transportation
Local Input Points• Use in Regional Impact and Division Needs categories only
• # of Points = base points + additional points based on population
• 100 point cap for any one project; points can also be donated across Regions/Divisions
7
Transportation
• Regional Impact & Division Needs – Allocate funds to Highway and Non-Highway modes based on minimum floor or percentages
Mode Workgroup Recommendation
Historical Budgeted
Historical Expenditures
Highway 90% (min.) 93% 96%
Non-Highway 4% (min.) 7% 4%
Normalization
8
Transportation
STI Provisions for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects
Independent bike/ped projects are submitted separate from roadway projects, and scored per bike/ped criteria
Incidental accommodations to roadway projects are submitted within highway project scope
• Not subject to state fund restrictions• Must compete on highway improvement merits
9
Transportation
Types of Bicycle and Pedestrian Eligible Projects
• Bike lane (on NCDOT or local street)
• Multi-use path/greenway
• Paved shoulder
• Sidewalk
• Pedestrian signals/curb ramps
• Other streetscape/pedestrian improvements
10
Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects: Requirements• Federal funding typically requires 20% non-federal match
• State law prohibits state match for bicycle and pedestrian projects (except for Powell Bill)
• Limited number of project submittals per MPO/RPO/Division
• Minimum project cost requirement – $100,000
• Plan adoption and division coordination are initial project screening questions
Transportation
Bicycle and Pedestrian – SPOT 4.0 CriteriaCriteria Weight
Safety 15%
Access 10%
Demand 10%
Connectivity 10%
Cost-Effectiveness 5%
12
Transportation
Bike/Pedestrian Criteria – SafetyDefinition: Projects or improvements where bicycle or pedestrian accommodations are non-existent or inadequate for safety of users
How it’s measured: Crash history, posted speed limits, and estimated safety benefit
13
Transportation
Bike/Ped Criteria – Safety CalculationBicycle/Pedestrian Crashes: 40% weightBicycle or pedestrian crashes within last 5 years along the corridor• For multi-use projects, both bicycle and pedestrian crash data will be
used• For new off-road facilities, crash data for parallel routes will be used
Posted Speed Limits: 40% weight Posted speed limit (higher limit, higher points)
Project Safety Benefit: 20% weight Creates score for each Specific Improvement Type (SIT)
14
Transportation
Bike/Ped Criteria – Access
Definition: Destinations that draw or generate high volumes of bikes/pedestrians
How it was measured: Type of and distance to destination
15
Transportation
Bike/Ped Criteria – DemandDefinition: Projects serving large resident or employee user groups
How its measured: # of households and employees per square mile within 1 ½ mile bicycle or ½ mile pedestrian facility + factor for unoccupied housing units (second homes)
16
Transportation
Bike / Ped Criteria – ConnectivityDefinition: Measure impact of project on reliability and quality of network
How it’s measured: Creates score per each SIT based on degree of bike/ped separation from roadway and connectivity to similar or better project type
17
Transportation
Bike/Ped Criteria – Cost EffectivenessDefinition: Ratio of calculated user benefit divided by NCDOT project cost
= (Safety + Demand + Access + Connectivity)/Estimated Project Cost to NCDOT
18
Bicycle and Pedestrian SPOT 4.0: In summary
• There is no state or federal programming budget by mode
• All modes compete for Division Needs allocation based on final scores
• Local input points are very important
• Bicycle and pedestrian projects will be funded from whatever eligible federal funds are available
• Bicycle and pedestrian projects will be programmed based on final project scores and overall state ranking among other bike/ped projects
21 Transportation
Federal Funding Programs
Transportation22
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)
Transportation
NC Directions for TAP
• MPOs are responsible for administering TAP funds directly sub-allocated to TMA regions
• NCDOT will use SPOT process to select TAP-eligible projects, based on score and population tier
• MAP-21 due for reauthorization
Transportation
Other Federal ProgramsCMAQ
• Funding source for bicycle and pedestrian projects in eligible areas• Check with MPO or Transportation Planning Branch for more details
HSIP• Projects evaluated based on safety benefit to cost ratio• SPOT Bicycle and pedestrian projects are being reviewed for HSIP potential
STP-DA • Managed by eligible MPOs for variety of activities• If used on bike/ped projects, will count against Division Needs funding
STP • May be programmed for eligible SPOT bike/ped projects, dependent on final
scores
Transportation
Complete Street (Incidental) Accommodations
25
Transportation
Bicycle/Pedestrian Accommodation Policies
A variety of policies exist concerning accommodation of bicycle/pedestrian facilities within NCDOT projects (see http://www.ncdot.gov/bikeped/lawspolicies/)
• Administrative Action to Include Greenway Plans (1994, 2015)• Guidelines to consider greenways/crossings during the highway planning process, and allow inclusion of
greenway crossing/element as incidental to the highway expenditure.
• Pedestrian Policy (1993, 2001)• Allows NCDOT to participate with municipalities in construction of sidewalks as incidental features of highway
improvement projects. Municipality is required to maintain sidewalk, and a cost share approach is utilized.
• Bridge Policy (1994)• Establishes design elements for bridges, and addresses sidewalks and bicycle facilities on bridges. Cost
share established by reference to Pedestrian Policy.
• Complete Streets Policy (2009)• Directs NCDOT to consider and incorporate all modes when building new projects or making improvements
to existing infrastructure.
*Parenthetical year is original publication, most recent update of policy/document
26
Transportation
Pedestrian Policy
• Municipality or County must notify NCDOT about the desire for a sidewalk and will be responsible for evaluating need, public involvement, maintenance, and liability.
• The municipality is responsible for ROW/easement and utility relocation where outside the berm of the roadway project.
• Standard cross section follows AASHTO and includes 5’ sidewalks and curb ramps.
• Includes all pedestrian facilities, such as multi-use paths.
• Betterments are local cost responsibilities (i.e. decorative pavers, wider sidewalks).
• DOT will fund sidewalks on both sides of bridges with 200’ length or less.
• DOT will study and consider sidewalks on both sides for longer bridges, but may only fund sidewalk on one side for bridges with longer length.
27
Transportation
Bridge Policy
• Sidewalks shall be included on new bridges with curb and gutter approach roadways that are without control of access; in some cases, only one side may warrant a sidewalk. A determination on providing sidewalks on one or both sides of new bridges will be made during the planning process according to the NCDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines.
• Sidewalks should not be included on controlled access facilities.
• When a sidewalk is justified, it shall be a minimum of 5’-6” wide.
• Cost share generally includes the cost of sidewalk construction. NCDOT provides the “offset” (shoulder width) regardless of sidewalk construction.
• A minimum handrail height of 42” is required.
• When a “bikeway” is required, the bridge shall be designed in accordance with AASHTO standard bicycle accommodations to give safe access to bicycles where feasible.
• [Note: A minimum handrail height of 54” is included, but AASHTO only requires 42”-48” railing height depending on travel speeds.]
28
Transportation
Complete Streets Policy
• Requires that NCDOT will consider multimodal alternatives in the design and improvement of all appropriate transportation projects within a growth area of a town or city unless exceptional circumstances exist.
• Routine maintenance projects may be excluded if funding is not available.
• 2012 Planning and Design Guidelines further describe approach and decision-making process.
• Cost responsibilities not described in policy or guidelines.
Reference for Cross Sections:
• Urban Main Street – includes sidewalk zones; 6’ bike lane (note about shared lanes)
• Suburban Avenue – includes sidewalk zones; 4-6 bike lane (with note about 5’ wide preferred bike lane)
• Rural Parkway – include 10-12’ multi-use path zone behind berm
29
Transportation
Complete Streets Process
Transportation
Context for Bicycle/Pedestrian AccommodationsH 97 – raised questions concerning bicycle and pedestrian accommodations incidental to NCDOT projects
SECTION 29.5.(a) G.S. 136-66.3(e) reads as rewritten:
"(e) Authorization to Participate in Project Additions. – Pursuant to an agreement with the Department of Transportation, a county or municipality shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for the cost of all improvements requested by the county or municipality, including additional rights-of-way, streets, highway improvement projects, or other transportation system improvements approved by the Board of Transportation under G.S. 143B-350(f)(4), that are in addition to those improvements that the Department of Transportation would normally include in the project. Requests for safety enhancements or efforts to facilitate the flow of traffic shall not be considered improvements under this subsection unless the enhancement or effort is in excess of the standard required by law."
Several NCDOT bicycle/pedestrian accommodation policies already address this requirement with cost-sharing guidelines for “normal” improvements and local responsibility for “betterments.”
31
Transportation
FAQs
• Can multiuse paths be accommodated on a bridge?
• When is the standard cross section or shoulder width determined?
• Who pays for a sidewalk in an unincorporated area?
• How are on-road bike facilities and crosswalks treated within cost share policies?
32