7/31/2019 DED 318 Rubric

1/2

Issues of Our Times

Teacher Name: Group "Technology"

CATEGORY Excellent!Content

Relevance of Material

Organization

Group Cooperation

Resources

Technology

Group name/topic: ________________________________________

WaytoGo! Goodeffort.Content was in-depth andmeaningful. Good research andsynthesis is obviously present.

Content was meaningful, butcould have gone farther in-depth. Group used goodresearch strategies andsynthesized it well.

Content only included surfaceresearch and synthesis.

Material had real-worldapplication for the audience.Audience was able to connectto the presentation andmaterial was valuable.

Audience could connect to thematerial, but not everythingwas applicable.

Audience could connect toonly parts of the presentation.

Project and presentation werewell organized, easy to follow,

and engaged the audience.

Organization made sense andkept the audience engaged, but

maybe would have been moreeffective if changed slightly.

Presentation could haveengaged the audience more if

organization was stronger.

Everyone in the group spoke inturn, the same amount, andwere comfortable with eachother. It is obvious each personpulled his or her own weight.

Group worked well together,but transitions betweenspeakers were not quitesmooth. Some group membersspoke more than others.

Group could have practiced thepresentation more; only one ortwo people seemed to knowthe material well; transitionswere rough.

Resources were mentionedoften during the presentationand reflected quality researchfrom various sources.

Resources were inconsistentlymentioned during thepresentation and reflectedquality research from a fewsources.

Resources were not mentionedduring the presentation andreflected only surface researchfrom a few sources.

Group successfully used theGoogle resources.

Group could have used theGoogle resources to betterpotential.

Group used only one or two ofthe Google resources.

Date Created: Jul 15, 2012 02:52 pm (CDT)

7/31/2019 DED 318 Rubric

2/2

Maybenexttime...It is obvious that no researchwas done over the material.

Material was completelyirrelevant to the audience.

Presentation was completelyunorganized - audience had

trouble making sense of thedirection and actual topic ofthe project.

Group coherence is non-existent. No one seems toknow the material or be able tospeak over it. Transitions arenot present.

Resources were not mentionedduring the presentation andreflected little or no relevanceto the presentation.

Group did not use the Googleresources.