deduced products of c4-dicarboxylate transport regulatory genes of
TRANSCRIPT
Volume 15 Number 19 1987 Nucleic Acids Research
Deduced products of C4-dtearboxylale transport regulatory genes of Rhizobium Uguminosarumare homologous to nitrogen regulatory gene products
Clive W.Ronson1-", Patricia M.Astwood1, B.Tracy Nixon1-4 and Frederick M.Ausubcl2
•Grasslands Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Private Bag, PalmerstonNorth, New Zealand and 'Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School and Department ofMolecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Received August 10, 1987; Accepted September 9, 1987
ABSTRACTWe have sequenced two genes dctB and dctD required for the activation of theC.-dicarboxylate transport structural gene dctA in free-living Rhizobiumlequmlnosarum. The hydropathic profile of the dctB gene product (DctB)suggested that its N-tenninal region may be located in the periplasm and itsC-terminal region in the cytoplasm. The C-terminal region of DctB wasstrongly conserved with similar regions of the products of several regulatorygenes that may act a6 environmental sensors, including ntrB, envZ, virA, phoR,cpxA, and phoM. The N-terminal domain of the dctD gene product (DctD) wasstrongly conserved with N-terminal domains of the products of severalregulatory genes thought to be transcriptional activators, including ntrC,ompR, virG, phoB and sfrA. In addition, the central and C-terminal regions ofDctD were strongly conserved with the products of ntrC and nlfA,transcriptional activators that require the alternate sigma factor rpoN (ntrA)as co-activator. The central region of DctD also contained a potential ATP-binding domain. These results are consistent with recent results that showthat rpoN product is required for dctA activation, and suggest that DctB plusDctD-mediated transcriptional activation of dctA may be mechanisticallysimilar to NtrB plus NtrC-mediated activation of glnA in E. coli.
PrmuOUlTi.CN
The C4-dicarboxylate transport structural gene dctA is expressed in both
free-living and symbiotic forms of Rhizobium leguminosarum. In free-living
cells, expression of dctA is induced by succinate, fumarate or malate, and
dctA product (DctA) is required for growth on these C4-dicarboxylates as
carbon sources. DctA is also essential for symbiotic nitrogen fixation, as
dctA mutants form nodules that contain bacteroids but do not fix nitrogen
(1-4). The symbiotic role of DctA has not been defined, but it is likely that
DctA is required for transport of C4-dicarboxylate6 into bacteroids for use as
energy substrates (reviewed in 5,6).
The dctA gene encodes a hydrophobic polypeptide of 444 ami no acids and is
the only structural gene required for C4-dicarboxylate transport in both
symbiotic and free-living rhizobip (2,5). The dctA promoter (5) is strongly
homologous to the consensus promoter -26 CTOGYAYR-N4-TTGCA -10 recognized by
the rpoN (ntrA) sigma factor (7), and recent results have shown that rpoN
© IRL Press Limited, Oxford, England. 7921
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
product (FpoN) 1B required for dctA expression (8). Other promoters known to
be recognised by RpoN such as qlnAp2 and nif promoters also require the
product of another regulatory gene, either the nitrogen regulator ntrC or the
nif-specific regulator nifA, for activation (reviewed in 7). The ntrC and
nifA products (NtrC and NifA respectively) are structurally similar, sharing
extensive regions of homology outside of their N-terminal domains that may
include a domain that interacts with RpoN (9,10). These observations suggest
that the dctA promoter may require an activator analogous to NtrC or NifA.
The regulation of dctA is complex. The dctA gene may be under negative
autogenous control, since a dctft-lacz fusion is expressed constitutively in
dctA mutants (5,11). In addition, two regulatory loci dctB and dctD that are
closely linked to dctA but probably transcribed divergently to dctA (1,2,5,
11), are required in addition to inducer and RpoN for dctA activation in free-
living rhizobia. The regulatory components of the dct regulon may also be
required for symbiotic nitrogen fixation, since nitrosoguanidine-induced dctB
mutants form nodules that fail to fix nitrogen (1,2). However only one out of
12 Tn5-induced dctB mutants formed nodules that fixed nitrogen at
significantly less than wild-type rates; the other Tn5-induced dctB mutants
and three Tn5-induced dctD mutants formed nodules that fixed nitrogen as well
as nodules formed by wild-type rhizobia (11). The reason for the disparity in
symbiotic phenotypes between the chemically-induced and transposon-induced
dctB mutants is not clear.
In this paper, we report the DNA sequence of dctB and dctD, and the
precise location and orientation of the Tn5 insertions. We report that dctB
product (DctB) is homologous over its C-terminal region to a variety of
proteins including ntrB product (NtrB) that may act as environmental sensors,
and that dctD product (DctD) is homologous over its N-terminal region with a
variety of proteins including NtrC that may act in conjunction with a sensor
component to activate transcription in response to environmental stimuli.
Furthermore DctD is strongly homologous in other regions to NtrC and NifA.
Based on these results, we propose that DctB is a receptor for C4-
dicarboxylates and transduces a signal across the membrane to DctD which then
acts in conjunction with RpoN to activate transcription of dctA. We also
propose a model to account for the symbiotic phenotypes of the regulatory
mutants.
AND METHODS
The region of DNA containing dctB and dctD was sequenced using specific
restriction fragments and nested sets of deletions generated using Bal 31
7922
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
nuclease (Fig. 1). Appropriate restriction fragments were subcloned from the
dct plasmids pPNlO3 and pRO.04 (2) into M13 mp8 and mp9 (12). The 1.2 kb
BamHI/EcoRI fragment and the 2.1 Sail fragment (Fig. 1) were subcloned into
pUC8 (13) and the resultant plasmids used as the sources of DNA for the
construction of Bal 31-generated deletions as described (8). Sequencing was
done by the dideoxy method using a 17-base universal primer and [ S)dATP as
label (14).
Sequence was also determined from the ends of several Tn5 insertions in
dctB and dctD. Recombinant plasmids that contained Tn5 insertions previously
used to generate dctB and dctD mutants by homogenotization (11), were digested
with EcoRI plus BamHI or BamHI alone, and the fragments cloned into pUC8.
Appropriate clones were screened for kanamycin resistance to determine the
orientation of the Tn5 insertion. The fragments were then cloned into M13 mp8
for sequence determination using a Tn5-specific primer as described (8). The
sequence generated also served to sequence across the EcoRI site in dctB (Fig.
1).
DNA sequences were compiled using the DBAUTO and DBOTIL programs (15), and
were analysed using programs from the University of Wisconsin (16). The
program FASTP (17) was used to screen the NBRF Protein Identification Resource
data base for sequences homologous to DctB or DctD. Pair-wise comparisons
between proteins were made with the ALIOJ program, using the mutation data
matrix and a gap penalty of 16 (18). The alignment scores given represent the
number of standard deviations separating the maximum score of the real
sequences from the mean of the maximum scores of 100 random permutations of
the two sequences (18).
dctA dctB dctD>133 3i>2006
; 7 1 s \ \ I I > K I I'v I Ik l v - „PP PBP X E XPPXPXKPS XP PS
1kb
Figure 1. Restriction map of the dct regulon from R. lequminosarum (2,11), andstrategy used to sequence the dctB and dctD genes. The heavy line indicatesthe region, the sequence of which is presented in Fig. 2. The sequence wasdetermined from restriction fragments (•—), deletions generated using Bal 31nuclease (i—-), and from the ends of Tn5 insertions (*—•). Restriction sites:B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; K, Kpnl; P, Pstl; S, Sail; X, Xhol.
7923
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Nucleotide sequences of dctB and dctD
In previcxis work, we defined the region of DNA containing dctB and dctD by
genetic complementation studies and transposon mutagenesis (2,5,11). We have
now sequenced thi6 region (Fig. 1), and also determined the orientation and
precise sites of several Tn5 insertions. The sequence data (Fig. 2) revealed
two open-reading frames (ORFs). The first ORF of 1866 nucleotides was
designated dctB since it corresponded precisely in location and orientation to
the region previously genetically defined to be dctB (2). Furthermore
sequence analysis showed that all Tn5 insertions that gave a DctB~ phenotype
(leaky growth on succinate) were located in this ORF. The translation
initiation site of dctB was arbitrarily assigned at the first of two possible
ATG codons which were separated by 12 bp. Neither ATG codon was preceded by a
good match to the consensus ribosome binding site defined for E. coli genes
(19). The first ATG codon of dctB was separated from that of dctA by 223 bp,
and the genes were transcribed divergently (data not shown). The second ORF
was designated dctD since the three Tn5 insertions that gave a DctD~ phenotype
(no growth on succinate) mapped within the ORF. The translation initiation
site of dctD was also assigned at the first of two potential ATG codons which
were separated by 3 codons, giving an ORF of 1344 nucleotides. The dctD
sequence was preceded by two potential ribosome binding sites, the first of
which (AAGG) overlapped dctB, and dctB and dctD were separated by 4
nucleotides (Fig. 2).
Eight out of the nine Tn5 insertions in dctB and dctD that were analyzed
were in the same orientation, with transcription of the nptll gene from left
to right with reference to Fig. 1. The insertion in strain 659, which is the
only Tn5-induced dctB or dctD mutant strain that formed Fix" nodules (11), was
the only insertion in the opposite orientation.
Structure of the dctB product
A search of the Protein Identification Resource protein data base using
the FASTP program (17) revealed that DctB shared homology over its C-terminal
region to the product of envZ, an E. coli gene involved in osmoregulation (20,
21). It has recently been reported that envZ product shares extensive
homology over its C-terminal 250 amino acids to analogous regions of the
products of the regulatory genes ntrB (22), cpxA (23), phoR (24), and virA
(25). Comparison of the C-terminal region of DctB with the other gene
products using the ALIGN program showed that several residues grouped in 5
regions were either invariant or substituted by a conservative change in all
six proteins. The product of a further gene phoM (26) was also found to
contain these homologous regions (Fig. 3).
7924
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
mAAmaKaaMTrawmAriMTO*^in . .TCgTOMiaAAMTQCACAAATCCOCCATQT
» H «AAATCCOCCATQTaiJIUIUJLAOWriUIlUXI lUAIUaanKAACACCgMTCCnCCOMTOTOaTOaOTATIXCOCflCTCOCCTTCCTCnm
H « S A y i V S ( « L I P S L P L « B B I B B M 1 I T T A A L A F L ADrtflfr . . . . .
xcmoaKCAoaaj^rattCAXAccoaoa^^H U U L E E I H U I l L U EV V A S L 1 T S t E l M H U U L E E I H U I l L I U U I T U E
3 5 1 • ~~ . . . . v e a . . . . . . .AAATACcoQQaxiiaiiiuiiKioiuiAmttAancocTuxujuaujT^^K Y R A L P F Y L S R O T A L A A A L V Q U D A O T F E R L S q i L E I L A A a
*awa»xau][CATaATOTCATCO>CA«oaKoocATataiTmogiAocAACTOQcom^T « A A V I Y ¥ I D « O O I A V S A S N f R E P T S F » O I O T « F R E Y F R O
oPBTeaucawaKAoaccoMCACi i iujJuujLLAcm>>a*AOAAACOHiTcmATATCT^^A Y E R O ( A E H F A L O T V I « K P a L Y l S ( « I S O S » a L L O Y Y V V «m . . . y t n . . . .OTcaMTTcmcatanaMaxaMTTOQMcarnxaQCAcrtxanCTACOTa^^Y E F D D Y E A D l l A i a T P S Y Y Y O E R a i V L I T S L P J I R F I I T i aMl . . . . . . . .
T n r r m T«"i A E D R C~i~T~i "i~E S"L ~Q F FA"ATr ( •TL'TT'TTi lT ' i T ' 7 7 ' F L D Y Y E951 . . . . . . .ATCaraTaCCCOOCaATOaraHAAACCAOaTTTCTraTgTCOCAACCroXITU^^I V H P O D A a K T R F L D Y A T S V P A T a i H L t H L Y A L Q P S V D A a iU B I . y o s . . . . . . . .ctxaAAoaxocAiacTaauTTanuTAcraTXCAaacraaccQaAQCAuai l a m u m uicaccATAca*TcoctCTQMaATCTcaMn*ACAOCAMCAcaAawR E A R M L A L L I L L P L L A Q A A F L L B R R H T I A L R I t S E H H A R E12« . I ! TiU . . . . . .
KTE L E R R V V E R T L D L S 4 A R D R L 0 . A E I I Q H > S T E q K L q A V Q R Dlsn
CTaTQMATCAAOCAglOgTQQCQICCATCCaTXnATOCaWTAAL V q A a R L A I L a q V A A Q V A H E l a q P Y A T I R A Y A O N A R T F L D1441 . . . . . . . . J O B
a a q T A P A Q E « L E I I A A L I E R I Q $ I T E E L « T F A « j a B 0 5 A E15»1 . . . . . . . .
n i C A T P O M C A I X I U I IU.U.MH.UUI I IUJJJgOrATOMTAOKTCaCATCQACCTgCXCCaKQAAaaCAflOTMTaaMAACP T Q L K D V I E O A V M L L R S R F A O R I I D T L D I D L P P D E L q V V a a18M . . . . t8» . . . . . .CO^TTCOTCTO>a>BTCCrCATCAAarrOCTTCAQWXCCTgL^^R I R L E V V L I i L L q i l A L E A V A P I A Q E O R Y E I R T t T D A a V Y T1»1 . . . . . .» T Y A D I l a P Q l P T E I B « O L F T P F « T J I ( E S Q L Q L O L y l 8 « D I
i«nBTC0QCttKTA<ll>V'n'l.lliAT0Q<C0TTTgAAaaiAagBQranACCCOamATaiTTCAOaBW^^Y Q D Y O a R U D Y A I D S O Q T R F l y j L R t A . H D T L H P Y A L I D D»41 . . TSJ» . . . . . . OctB)rmr itnmw mttt i||.f i y^rTw^i^FTvnTTTmM 111̂ mi i in nrn^ATiYiCTff^wrr^trTTTTrT^vTnrnrriwrTTTTrnTrr'^O K D L R R A T A ( T L E L A O F J Y S A T O O A « A A L A D L P A D F A O r Y
nn . . . .CflTC t̂fCQATATCCQCATQCrrflr̂ WTr̂ yflflftl' \^f Pf9\ TT11fff f tf nrTnr/̂ WQ^^TQQ^TOTCQtfCTQCtQQTQ^TCCT^^TQ^CCOQrC f̂OQrQATAI I tXX̂ ATQQCCQT
V T D I H i P E I D Q L R L F A T L Q O M O V D L P V I L M T Q H Q D I P M A VO61 . . . . . . . . . . . .
r ^ j m r f f r H V ; rrTmimnmvmmHfrr I Ill M IWWfVTOQ A i q D Q A Y D F I A K P F A A O R L V q i V R R A S E K R R L V L E I I B M L
K O M A A ( u a x a A A « T 6 c a c A o a ^ T n a c a r T M i T » c c A < i A ^ ^y O L y A
K O A u « T 6 c a c A o a ^ T n a c a r T M i T » c c A < i A ^ ^B I A A E D A S E M L P L I O H T P y y E K L R M I L B H I A O T O y O Y L y A
coacowcooccAAOQAMTanTocccAWTCcrocATOOTOQMc^^ i IUJIJJUXIUAACIUIUUUJXI jxeawearrarowO E T a t a t E V V A q i L H q i l H R R t Q I F V A L I I C a A L P E T y l E S
awciui I I ' I I I i inm" uLiixn.u i lAcannicAaAAoaxxacAcooQccacATatu^TttAMcaainKAagigi iccTcamwTCaAAAocAToaaaiocE L F O H E B O A F T O A ( » B B T O B I E H A j g O T L F L D E I E 5 U P A A
nei ?O7? 7C t c O o o o n A c o c c o c T C O o c C w i T a w i c u m i m uT | l > I I - I U E l l E I T P L t T I E X P I I L H V H H I D L I D P
uxmuuicaoaaTXiia»KuxmuuiaoXTiwi)a»KmmKM^*mdnaoMcm a i t t w A a w g r n o c o c aA V R 0 D F R E 0 L Y Y R L M V V T I S I P P L I E R R D D I P L L F 3 H F A A
TorrnrVwTaniujiujLWTCTcajLUJLi i iu<CTMiuiuujuujJLATCTOrCAO^^R A A E R F R R O V P P L S P D V R R H L A S U T I P O I I V R E L S H Y A E R V
y L O Y E Q O O A A A y P P I l P T f l A T L P E B L E B T E A E I I S D T L S A K
TQMmjmimeccitkcATaiMiistTaaaiATTmimuijckt^D a D Y R R T I E A L O I P B K T F Y O ( L I ) R H a i a i i a a Y S S R K <
Figure 2. Nucleotide sequence of dctB and dctp genes, and deduced amino-acidsequence of their products. Possible ribosome binding sites and ATGinitiation codons are overlined. The potential membrane-spanning regions ofdctB product are underlined. Sites of Th5 insertions are indicated byarrowheads together with the number of the induced mutant strain. Strains660, 533, 535, 543, 536 and 659 are dctB mutants, and strains 538, 663 and 537dctP mutants (11).
7925
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
E R R V V E R T L OP R I O O D R q V DT L V I D 0 R 5 H II R i q H R P L V OA I S L A X P A R KT R D F S R P L H L
RUCTB 3S98PKTR8 87KPKTRB 82ECHYZ mectnu usBOTH) 169ECHO! 2f8 R S I A R L T R Y A ] [ S VATYIRA 429 PR P C Q Q E I RLQEL
RUCTB412BFVTRB 141KPKTRB 138SBtVZ M lBXPXA246ECPHDR a iEPHOM 282ATYIRA 481
VAHEIM.AHEIlT.AHEIK
qPYATrlltRi?Lsai4 'LOO
QtYSHDLRrPLTRID I S H E L R T P L T R« Y S H E L R T P L T V-THELK
Oil A H EF WWLAAIOSI
tlOHKSTEqKLq --AVqqOLYqANRLAILOq|YlAI V V U L q E R T I A D - K y D R q L T H R S A A R S V I A. L E V A P U D N q R R L S q E q L q H A q q i A A R DP P P L R E Y O A S E Y R S V T R A - F N H U A A a V K q L A D D R T L
. R q H P E L E A Q P q E F L A A Q A S F N q y V T A L E R y y T S q q Rn P Y T H I Q L L H - -YARDYTqHHqLEOARRN
rE.HK?YPLPDLOSSELRKLAH ALESMRYKLEOKHYIEqi fYU > C | ] C H Y I D Y R R K q T E C D VLARRLEHAQRLEAVOT
R T F L D R 0 q T A P A 0 E N L E S |I]A A' HSEDRL LTRLI~"
DPALHE---YTKYIYLAESI
LhRRSlf lESKE L E R Ii y N E q P L E Q A V R E K - - /
R E O P ( P j P E Y Y A R - - - F T D K IqMSY[SJRTSVTRR--T IOY( I
CD
I S Si
(QRO)RPYRHPOTORE
. vusRbiqqxL T L S K
J I A R . E M RI tTLSRBqER
HJCTB474BFKTRa I NKPKTRB 183ECOVZ IBSB X F X A M lECPHDR 171ECPHOU K lATYIRA S41
HLKTB S33BPKTRB K 7KPKTRB R lECBtVZUlECCPXA K 3BCPHOR 131EOTt t lH lATYIRA E99
RLDCTB 681BPKTRB 319KPKTRB 3f7ECStVZ 394ECCFXA4MECPHOR 378ECPHOU 428ATYIRA 869
5 A E P T Q L K D Y I E Q A Y WA R Q P V N I H S Y L D H V K RH H V T E S I H K V A E R V V KH P U E H A D L N A V L O E V IH A L V S E T I K A H q L1S E|YP T H L L N E X V D V P U H L R Yt E V V L T A V D V A A L F R R V S E A R f V q L A E K Ki l K P F S Y S E L V T E I A P
.PTRFAORUDTL DlfM S Q F A R K V R F I [VSHELPDUVKLY K\f,
AAESQYEREIETA-.tHAAFEAEqyORSLTYBEREAqTLSqXKR-TFTFE
- - --ITLT.RyALPPNIELS--FRFE
EL(rVlyQNRiR(E|Eqvfni. P P V . A « R D H L I q Y F L h L VklX AlA
Yb|P S L P E . P H D P D q i E q V L L H I V R N A' Y P Q S I E V < y H P L S I K R A V A H y V M A A
P.QPIPL - K V S O K E D q L R S A I S N L V r H A V
T E Y K V A A E P A L L E R A L Q N L L J N A II IEQSPL Bug q y L iw i c&w A|SY - -
EjTtR T S T D A Q M V T R I T T V I A I D N 0 P 0 I PIT E I R K O O l T
H Q V R Y R L A A R I D V E D N a P Q I P S H L q O T L F Y P U VI V S S a T E P N R A I F q V E D D O P Q I A P E q R K H L F q P F Y R
i t E V a F A V D K D Q I T I T Y D D D Q P O V S P E D R E q i F R P F Y RI T V R t q R V P H Q A E F S V E D M Q P Q I A P E H I P R L TI T L j S A E V D q E H V T L K V L D Q ] a S Q I P D Y A L S R I
A H O Y M P P O P Y Y L L S I S D H O O a i P E A V L P H I
(HAVAPKIATQEOR „ ,_E1A V A D LICIT D A E i q L T T A F R P Q V R L S Y PTTK K S R V S L P L E)F|qV|K|D N Q S Q V P | E D L L P K | L F | D | P F Y TB J A L O P E j o J O E I T L R T R T A F qR Y Q M O 1R Y S H T K
WH T P E QfTlH
B T f t - - -TK RO R E
Q D S A R T I - -T O E A R D R E SY O K A R S R q TL--TR-
qRANOq
AR II
T O S O L O L T L 33 0 T Q L O L S I
A K I V Q D H Q Q IR S L I D q H S Q K I E F
3i Q T O L O L
Q T O L O L A I V R R I V D N H M Q y .Q O T Q L a L A I Y E T A i q q H R Q I Y l3 Q S Q L Q L A I V K H A Y K H H E S R _[)S S Q L 0 L A FY S EVJAJRLF K|Q|E)vl
- • A|S1YJH Q H I S A F A Q r i D V
j S l Q P R K T T -S I P O H T E -
h]S ERG Q L S;TTs p L o Q L Rd]TYQKQTR
RlYREOOYLATVQHOTR "
Y O N P N A L E S A L E N I Y R *A
I E A A
K A »lo v q R R q A T R p K q p R •
S l V Y L P I R K *R A I L P V P V T R A q a T T K E Q tY I I L P . Y K R S *
E R L I A K K S D .R H F T .
3 | I Y L B P S S K E P . . 1 3 2 • • •
Figure 3. Alignment of C-terainal regions of products homologous to dctBproduct (RLDCTB), including the products of ntrB from Klebsiella pngiminniae(K 27) d d h l b l [ i ] ( P f 22) i Z (ECENVZp g p(KPNTRB; 27) and Bradyrhlzoblum spp. [Parasponia] (BPtfreB; 22), eiwZ (ECENVZ;
), p ( ; 23), phoR"TECPH0«; 24) and phoH (ECPHOM; 26) fromEscherlchia coli, and virA (AIVIRA; 25) from Agrobacterium tuaefaclens.•n H i i ~ T T t d f th i i l i t d t
;20), cpxA (BCCPXA;
, ( ; ) gimiH-ipi«<~flTTgnm»nt was prepared from the pair-wise alignments determined
using ALIGN by minimizing the number and location of gaps manually. Thisprocedure slightly reduced the alignment scores between any given pair ofsequences, but highlighted strongly conserved regions. Boxed residues areconserved, defined as more than 70% of amino acids belonging to one of thegroups P A G S T; H K R; Q N E D; I L V M F Y W C.
All the gene products homologous to DctB except NtrB contain two regions
of sufficient hydrophobicity to span the membrane, and virA and envZ products
have been shown to reside in the inner membrane (25,28). The hydropathy
profile of DctB (Fig. 4) showed that it also had two uncharged strongly
hydrophobic regions, one at residues 25 to 42 and one at residues 321 to 338.
The first potential membrane-spanning region was preceded by three arginine
residues, while the second region was preceded by two arginine residues and
7926
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
200 300 400 500 600
Figure 4. Hydropathy profile of dctB product at window-length 19, calculatedaccording to Kyte and Doolittle (29). Hydrophobic regions have positive valueand hydrophilic regions negative value.
followed by three arginine residues. Similar hydrophobic regions of 17 ormore residues surrounded by charged residues are known to be able to span thehydrophobic interior of the membrane (30,31). Hence the first hydrophobicregion of DctB may act as an uncleaved signal sequence, and the second regionas a "stop-transfer" or anchor sequence, as demonstrated for othertransmembrane proteins (30,31). Most of the N-terminal 320 amino acids ofDctB would then be periplasmically-located, while its conserved C-terminalregion would be located in the cytoplasm. The chemosensory receptor proteinsof E. coli have a similar structure (32) and the periplasmic domain has beenshown to bind the ligands (33,34). The binding of ligand is thought to causea signal to be transduced across the membrane to the cytoplasmic portion ofthe molecule. Similarly, binding of ligands to the periplasmic faces of theDctB homologues may cause activation of their conserved cytoplasmic regions.Structure of the dctD product
Like DctB, the regulatory proteins shown in Fig. 3 act in concert with asecond regulatory protein to regulate gene expression (reviewed in 35).Members of this second family which include ntrC (10,22), ompR (20), sfrA(36), phoB (37), virG (38,39) and "ORF2" (the gene downstream of phoM (26))products share extensive homology to each other and to the products of thecheY (40), cheB (40), spoOA (42) and spoOF (43) genes in their N termini ofabout 120 amino acids. DctD also shared this homology (Fig. 5). The N-terminal region is known to perform a regulatory function in cheB product(44). In the two-component systems, it may act as the receptor for signalstransmitted through the DctB homologues (22,35,38).
ompR, sfrA, phoB, virG and "0RF2" products share homology over theirentire length of about 240 amino acids, whereas NtrC diverges sharply afterthe H-terminal domain. However, the remainder of NtrC is highly homologous toanalogous portions of NifA, the positive regulator of rdf gene expression
7927
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
RLDCTD 1BWTK 1BF«TIC 1
»mms .EPLIHBCOBT 1 VADIELKBOB 1 I S K I RBSHF 1 MNEKIBSSPOA 1 D E I I I
LY|AjDODAAISL Y Y O O O y i .R ,I I Y E D E L Y T j ML Y V E D E A P f f
f L L Y D D D Y A
HI
. L > I I I K A « P - - D l P * L » « S A q i l T F y T A I U S' 3 - - « S q i » n P I I « Y T A I O E E » D R I » l
I R R H P -L J p s l u i y B P -
O L E I Y J IE . L I T
* IEK>arJEILIRkl
BE.BEQAI MA"•" . id«EsyT«Bjjp
A I S D - - I P I
P M l y T A H J D L 0 A A » ! ( r ( q 3 A F ) T L P I P F ) I D E- - I L P » l » I I I A q a T F K T A I I " 5 E ! » A T = T L P « f F J L « E . I T I
aqALSRAlT"- rE(QF
. y F L T C B D I E V O I IILTAJIOEEEDR^I[BOTRLEETOJ
TOIOSEVT- jRl
BPaisc i nMfTRC i nB O T A t UMOFA 19BMJQFA 171
RLXCTO 1S4BVTRC i nBFKTRC 179M I X 171DWFA SIIWIFA tmHJffA n i
RLDCTD M l(PaTBC M lemBc MI
0WFA 111
HXFA Z7I
RLDCTtSatPNTK M lamc anIWTK MlBKfksnRyJOFASSSHJUFAMJ
RLKTDI7iCVTRCMIEWTBC 364RWTRClStXPKfk 491RWFA 4HRLnFA4tl
K«nLVLE«ByiRIAAEDAqE»LpCT3)qTF7yHEP« -ERVSSPADDgEFDSIPEP«
. . EahvabcsD a n a Et T A L IDl IVQE5'AL(I I )»L|ATTII (* |AA|
UffqULKRKU L H D r Q < I R B a P F « « « > H A A I P ) DlALt D Y K I R I[U IB H I I PR A/[ E i H qH i r R q i \i T l h A L I I R I S
l A I L L R U I E a E t E R Y a C D E r L RPlPAFtAILLRViqEQEFERVOCTKI
m
RADAPFIALaHAAIP lDETVIESELFaaERQAFTaAqiR
P F Y A I I U A A I P I DAFYIF ICAALP>»
|PF IKF«CPALII A F H - I C A A L S
T P O T l a E. - . TB»O(YA
iaDyr iaEAhTRLLBVLiqQEYTTYQCRTi a o y P « O A ) T I I L L « » m O E Y T T Y Q ( B T
t ql A t L L R Y H E O E F E R L O 0 T »
yPIDLPPLBER1EDIAELA-PLILPPLREJR )
) qL ) « P P L R E R I E D L P 0 L I R H F F S L A E > D
* P L > L P P L > D R A E D I F D L * R H F V q q A E K E
LAI
Ay ^PYFRI IOB . S B B S I I H I• A y q E I T R U A R .
fA]T|O F I A I P FU A D RDv q S
OAT J T L P I P F ) L T E . I Q IE I l A D I Y I P I P F I P B E . L A a i R A V£ I HA 0 J T I T I P F IPRE T I BSPPAO > T I T I P F I P K E . YAH
AJSPFIAKPFIIRE :LABn«P£JTAATL|EE«
V T l PJLL a I RA I P F b l D E I R D A l~-£F)DyE«U»aH|
»ALk R A l EI J R A I IQ R A L AQ R A L A
T D V L V k l E T a i a i E V V AI 3 E J 0 T 0 I E L V AS Q E t g r a i E L V AT 1 E I Q T Q K E L V A
DlTThfLV ( 3 E f Q T O I E L I AM S I V L L I B E T Q T Q I E C F A
ES
-IE5ELF0BEIQAFTQAIIIV-IEJELFOBEHJAFTOAIIB.IE1ELFOBEKQAFTOA«TR- L E t E L F O B E K O A F T O A U C t-LEIELFOHEKQAFIOAIAQ
ET^LEIELFOHEHOAFTaALLQ
RPJVaLIVVAAAII
I KfTlD
a D PAY Bft,IVk EC
V R I V A A S a K D L R U I
.PQ
*YTlUlPPLBERh|DDIPtL[QFsfirFliARAAERFRII0YPP(L(tPDl««(£lA5HT|lPOI(¥RELl5VIM)V 4LPPLRER i ED IP R L AR HFUq I A A«ELO»EA« q I HPEfnEa A L T I L A I P O « V R ( L E i B
« P P L R E R I E D L P 0 L I R H F F S L A E > D - a k . P P > ( L D A q A L E R L I ( H R I P O a v R E L E a l- a L D V I R F D q E A L E L U ( A H P r P a a v B E L E a L
H F L V R I I A H j q O I T L R I I D C A I R L . a E r i r P Q a V R E L E a C
LiYEoaaRfLAAL YPqDYlT" i n Ypqon
' u SEsanTL ARSITlTti
OKTSC 417BPNTK 411RWTRC 4MIPMFA47BHKHOt
BLEDauqaLLiEAqPEPPPaLTHBILtEPPtaLTDBVLAE
(EpasAavAiaLIBAAATIEAAaLi
ERTL
T B F L q R F a E E a a R D L - H F A P f A L D H L I I C I
3 H I E -3 B F E 3 A D Q Q T L F L O E
r j 3RFE!AEOQTLFLPE1.1 H F E J A E O a T L F L D !
I I R F E . A D a a T L F L D Er i R F E I A ' Q a T L L L D EU R F E . A I O a T U L L P E
BEDLYYRL», REOLFBjRLar«EDLFFRL»:«EDLTYRL«:BEDLTYRLN
EpB£OLTYRILYYRI
-paavBELEachP
i l » T L j EB . F E t « I P D a P T q « L P D I I A T L L a q f A D R A L I I -:.APFA]»TSIIITATYO»DIILOQAVEAYLUH FJOFPIOV:.RSETPDSPIEKAAARtQSLtlSqAVEEayR-qTFASFODAL
^LF ( <BDa(BP(ALAt>aPAEDOILAC ( rCHCTsi lLnayiCIHOHIEIOAPAOTTPL-LOAPAIDVPPACyiDqC(g»ALLII«ADOOOIOIIOA»IOLItROTy«OI3LCAHAQTP
BITFYD
«t»ATB
rigure 5. Alignment of homologous regions of products conserved with dctpproduct (RLDCTD), including ntrC products from K. pneumoniae (KPNTOC; 9,10),Bradyrhlsoblum spp. [Parasponia] (BPNTRC; 22) and R. meliloti (RWWRC; 45);N-terminal regions of the products of ompR (ECOMPR; 20), sfrA (ECSFRA; 36),phoB (BCP90B; 37), cheY (BCCHEY, 41) andcheB (BCCHm; 4lTFrom Escnerlchiacoll (cheB and cheY from Salmonella typhimurium are similar (40)); and centraland C-teradnal regions of nifA products from KT pneirp̂ niae (KPNIFA; 9,10),B. meliloti (HMNIPA; 9) and R. legumunosarum TRLNIFA; 46). Alignments wereprepared as for Fig. 3. The potential nucleotide-binding site is underlined.
7928
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
Table 1. Pair-vdse alignment scores of the central regionsof products homologous to dctD product .
RLDCTDRPNTRCBPNTRCRMNTRCKPNIFARMNIFA
(145-389)(140-384)(140-383)(139-382)(212-455)(200-443)
KPNTRC43.9
BPNTRC4653
96
RMNTRC455883
864
KPNIFA40.546.244.954.3
RMNIFA38.347.345.842.654.8
RLNIFA43.644.348.449.559.566.2
Abbreviations are as in Figure 5.
(9,10). Analysis of DctD revealed that it was highly conserved with NtrC and
NifA proteins from several species in the regions where the NtrC and NifA
proteins are homologous to each other (Fig. 5). The regions of homology of
DctD with NtrC and NifA are consistent with the domain structure previously
proposed for the latter proteins (10). Hence DctD and NtrC share a common
N-tenninal domain linked by a hydrophilic segment (residues 120 to 142 of
DctD) to a conserved central region also found in NifA. The central region
may consist of more than one functional domain, since it contains segments of
strong homology separated by regions of lesser conservation. In particular,
the segment corresponding to residues 332 to 345 of DctD is hydrophilic but
poorly conserved in all proteins, suggesting it may be an inter-domain linker.
Following the conserved central region, and separated from it by a region of
variable length, all three products contain a helix-turn-helix motif
characteristic of a DNA-binding domain (ref. 10; asterisked in Fig. 5). The
linker between the conserved central and C-terminal domains is shortest in
DctD, accounting for most of the difference in size between DctD (448 amino
acids) and NtrC (469-480 amino acids) products.
The conserved central region and DNA-binding domain are likely to be
involved in functions common to NtrC, NifA and DctD. The central conserved
region of NtrC, NifA and DctD may be involved in interaction with RpoN or UNA
polymerase as all three proteins require RpoN as co-activator (8; reviewed in
7). Interestingly, the homology in the central region between NtrC proteins
from different species (mean score 65.2) and between NifA proteins from
different species (mean score 60.1) was greater than the homology between NtrC
and NifA proteins of the same species (mean score 44.4), or between NifA and
DctD from R. leguminosarum (score 43.6) (Table 1). This suggests that the
products diverged functionally before the species diverged evolutionarily.
Hence it seems likely that a progenitor gene encoding the conserved central
region has been adapted during evolution for use in several regulatory systems
that will require RpoN as co-activator. The consensus sequence characteristic
7929
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
dctD dctB „ _ _ _ dctA dctD dctB dcJA
Figure 6. Model for dctA activation. See text for details.
of RpoN-activated promoters has been observed in several structural genes
including xylA (47), carboxypeptidase G2 (48) and pilin genes (49) of
Pseudomonas species, and flagellin genes of Caulobacter crescentus (50). It
seems likely that each of these operons will require as co-activator a
regulatory gene product with hotnology to the central domain found in DctD,
NtrC and NifA.
The proposed DNk-binding domain may confer activator specificity on DctD,
NtrC and NifA, as NtrC and NifA each appear to recognize a specific nucleotide
sequence with dyad symmetry located at least 100 bp upstream of the promoters
they activate (51,52,53). The residues within the second helix of the helix-
turn-helix motif of the proteins, the helix that is likely to recognise the
specific binding site (54), are strongly conserved within the NtrC or NifA
proteins, but diverge between NtrC and NifA and with DctD. The dctA promoter
also contains regions of dyad symmetry upstream of the transcriptional
initiation site (unpublished data) and we are investigating whether these
regions are required for transcriptional activation by DctD.
DctD contains a potential nudeotlde-bindlng site in its central region
It has recently been shown that NtrB activates NtrC by phosphorylating it
(55). Examination of the sequence of NtrB or homologous regions of DctB did
not reveal hotnology to known protein kinases or ATP-binding sites. However a
potential ATP-blnding site was observed in strongly conserved regions of the
central portions of DctD, NtrC and NifA (underlined in Fig. 5). Walker et al
7930
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
(56) first observed two regions of hanology present in several nucleotide-
binding proteins, and these regions have been shown to form part of the ATP-
binding site of adenylate kinase (57). The first region in the central
portion of DctD etc., [G E S/T G S/T G K E] shows one mismatch to the
consensus [G X X G X G K S/T], while the second region ( A X G G T L F L D ]
contained two mismatches to the consensus [ G X X X L H y H y H y D ] , where Hy
represents an hydrophobic amino acid.
The presence of the potential ATP-binding site suggests that ATP may play
a role in the process of transcriptional activation mediated by DctD, NtrC and
NifA. In other proteins where it has been investigated, part of the consensus
ATP-binding site [G X X G X G K] is thought to form a flexible loop structure
that undergoes conformational change in response to either substrate binding,
as shown for adenylate kinase, or interaction with another protein or domain
(57). It has also been shown that mutations in a similar sequence of the ras
oncogene are responsible for the transforming ability of its product (58,59).
Mutagenesis of this region of DctD and its homologues should reveal whether
this sequence is involved in their activation in response to stimuli.
Model for dctA activation
We have shown that DctB and DctD are members of a conserved family of two-
component regulatory systems that respond to environmental stimuli (Figs 3 and
5; 22,35,38). These systems include E. coli genes responding to osmolarity
(envZ/oapR), nitrogen limitation (ntrB/htrC), phosphate limitation (phoiyphoB)
and toxic compounds (changes in membrane proteins controlled by cpxA/sfrA),
and genes controlling the virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in response
to plant exudate (virA/virG). One component of each system is thought to act
as a sensor that transduces a signal to the second component which then
activates the response. The conservation in the C-terminal regions of the
sensors including DctB and the N-terminal regions of the activators including
DctD may reflect a common mechanism of signal transduction.
Given the horology between NtrB and DctB over their C-terminal regions and
the hanology of NtrC with DctD over their entire length, it is likely that the
Ntr and Dct systems will show common mechanisms in their mode of action. On
this basis, we propose that Dct regulation involves the following features
(Fig. 6): DctB and DctD are constitutively produced at low levels (11).
Binding of a C4-dicarboxylate to the periplasmic face of DctB causes an
allosteric change in the cytoplasmic portion of DctB, causing activation of
DctB. Activated DctB then interacts with the N-terminal region of DctD, the
interaction resulting in an allosteric or covalent modification of the
remaining portion of DctD. Activated DctD in conjunction with RpoN then
activates transcription of dctA. This activation may involve ATP, since DctD
7931
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
contains a possible ATP-binding site in its central region. Activated DctB
may be a protein kinase that phosphorylates DctD, since NtrB is a protein
kinase that activates NtrC by phosphorylating it (55). Alternatively,
activated DctB may induce a conformational change in DctD rendering it capable
of autophosphorylation.
One feature of dctA regulation not accounted for in the model is the
observation that a dctA-lacZ fusion is constitutively expressed in a dctA
mutant background (5,11). A similar phenomenon has been observed in another
two-component system that regulates a transport operon. Strains mutated
within the pst operon that encodes the high-affinity phosphate transport
system and is regulated by phoIVpnoB, express other phosphate-regulated
opercms constitutively (60). The three-prime gene of the pst operon phoU is
not required for phosphate transport, and it has been proposed that it
functions directly or indirectly with a cc— repressor transported by the pst
system to repress pho gene expression under conditions of phosphate excess
(61,62,63). However an alternative explanation also applicable to dctA is
that the structural gene products are in contact with the sensor component and
hold it in a particular mode in the absence of changes in stimuli. We are
isolating dctA dctB double mutants to test this idea.
The finding that most Tn5-induced dctB and dctD mutants form nodules that
fix nitrogen at wild-type rates suggested that dctA must be regulated
differently in symbiotic rhizobia (11). However dctB mutants induced by a
chemical autagen, and one Tn5-induced dctB mutant, strain 659, formed nodules
severely affected in their ability to fix nitrogen (1,11). The Tn5 insertion
in strain 659 was in the opposite orientation to those in the other dctB and
dctD mutants, we suggest that most Tn5-induced dctB mutants are polar on dctD
whereas the chemically-induced mutants and the Tn5 insertion in strain 659 are
apolar. Hence in these latter strains DctD will be present in inactive form.
Inactive NtrC is able to bind to the glnAp2 promoter but does not activate
transcription (51,52). Similarly, inactive DctD may bind to the dctA promoter
region and interfere with dctA activation by another system, possibly NifA, in
the symbiotic state.
Part of this work was supported by a grant from Hoechst AG to Massachusetts
General Hospital.
'Present address and address for correspondence: Biotechnica International Inc., 85 Bolton Street,Cambridge, MA 02140, USA4Present address: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Pennsylvania State University,University Park, PA 16802, USA
7932
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
1.Ronson, C.W., Lyttleton, P. and Robertson, J.G. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 78, 4284-4288.
2. Rcmson, C.W., Astwood, P.M. and Downie, J.A. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 160,903-909.
3. Finan, T.M., Wood, J.M. and Jordan, D.C. (1981) J. Bacteriol. 148,193-202.
4. Finan, T.M., Wood, J.M. and Jordan, D.C. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 154,1403-1413.
5. Ronson, C.W. and Astwood, P.M. (1985) in Nitrogen Fixation ResearchProgress, Evans, H.J., Bottomley, P.J. and Newton, W.E., Eds., pp.201-207, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
6. Guerinot, M.L. and Chelm, B.K. (1987) in Plant-Microbe Interactions:Molecular and Genetic Perspectives, Vol. II, Kosuge, T. and Nester, E.W.,Eds., pp. 103-146, MacMillan, New York.
7. Gussin, G.N., Ronson, c.W. and Ausubel, F.M. (1986) Ann. Rev. Genet. 20,567-591.
8. Ronson, C.W., Nixon, B.T., Albright, L.M. and Ausubel, F.M. (1987) j.Bacteriol. 169, 2424-2431.
9. Buikema, W.J., Szeto, W.W., Lemley, P.V., Onne-Johnson, W.H. and Ausubel,F.M. (1985) Nuc. Acids Res. 13, 4539-4555.
10. Drummond, M., Whitty, P. and Wooten, J. (1986) EMBO Journal 5, 441-447.11. Ronson, C.W. and Astwood, P.M., manuscript in preparation.12. Yanisch-Perron, C , Viera, J. and Messing, J. (1985) Gene 33, 103-119.13. Viera, J. and Messing, j. (1982) Gene 19, 259-268.14. Bankier, A.T. and Barrell, B.G. (1983) in Techniques in Life Sciences,
B5: Nucleic Acids Biochemistry, Flavell, R.A., Ed., pp. 1-34,Elsevier/North Holland, Limerick.
15. Staden, R. (1982) Nuc. Acids Res. 10, 4731-4751.16. Devereux, J., Haeberli, p. and Smithies, 0. (1984) Nuc. Acids Res. 12,
387-395.17. Lipman, D.J. and Pearson, W.R. (1985) Science 227, 1435-1441.18. Dayhoff, M.O., Barker, W.C. and Hunt, L.T. (1983) Meth. Enzymol. 91,
524-545.19. Shine, J. and Delgarno, L. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71,
1342-1346.20. Cameau, D.E., Ikenaka, K., Tsung, K. and Inouye, M. (1985) J. Bacteriol.
164: 578-584.21. Hall, M.N. and Silhavy, T.S. (1981) Ann. Rev. Genet. 15, 91-142.22. Nixon, B.T., Ronson, C.W. and Ausubel, F.M. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 83, 7850-7854.23. Albin, R., Weber, R. and Silverman, P.M. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261,
4698-4705.24. Makino, K., Shinagawa, H., Amemura, M. and Nakata, A. (1986) J. Mol.
Biol. 192, 549-556.25. Leroux, B., Yanofsky, M.F., Winans, S.C., Ward, J.E., Ziegler, S.F. and
Nester, E.W. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 849-856.26. Amemura, M., Makino, K., Shinagawa, H. and Nakata, A. (1986) J.
Bacteriol. 168, 294-302.27. MacFarlane, S.A. and Merrick, M. (1985) Nuc. Acids Res. 13, 7591-7606.28. Liljestrom, P. (1986) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 36, 145-150.29. Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R.F. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132.30. Davis, N.G., Boeke, J.D. and Model, P. (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 181, 111-121.31. Davis, N.G. and Model, P. (1985) Cell 41, 607-614.32. Krikos, A., Mutoh, N., Boyd, A. and Simon, M.I. (1983) Cell 33, 615-622.33. Krikos, A., Conley, M.P., Boyd, A., Berg, H.C. and Simon, M.I. (1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 1326-1330.34. Park, C. and Hazelbauer, G.L. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 167, 101-109.35. Ronson, C.W., Nixon, B.T. and Ausubel, F.M. (1987) Cell 49, 579-581.36. Drury, L.S. and Buxton, R.S. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 4236-4242.
7933
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018
Nucleic Acids Research
37. Makino, K., Shinagawa, H., Amemura, H. and Nakata, A. (1986) J. Hoi.Biol. 190, 37-44.
38. Winans, S.C., Ebert, P.R., Stachel, S.E., Gordon, M.P. and Nester, E.W.(1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 8278-8282.
39. Melchers, L.S., Thompson, D.V., Idler, K.G., Schllperoort, R.A. andHooykaas, P.J.J. (1986) Nuc. Acids Res. 14, 9933-9942.
40. Stock, A., Koshland, D.E. and Stock, J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA82, 7989-7993.
41. Mutoh, N. and Simon, W.I. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 165, 161-166.42. Ferrari, F.A., Trach, K., LeCoq, D., Spence, J., Ferrari, E. and Hoch,
J.A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 2647-2651.43. Trach, K.A., Chapman, J.W., Pigot, P.J. and Hoch, J.A. (1985) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 82, 7260-7264.44. Simms, S.A., Keane, M.G. and Stock, J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,
10161-10168.45. Szeto, W.W., Nixon, B.T., Ronson, C.W. and AuEubel, F.M. (1987) J.
Bacteriol., 169, 1423-1432.46. Gronger, P., Manian, S.S., Reilandet, H., O'Cormell, M., Priefer, U.B.
and Punier, A. (1987) Nuc. Acids Res. 15, 31-49.47. Inouye, S., Ebina, Y., Nakazawa, A. and Nakasawa, T. (1984) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1688-1691.48. Minton, N.P. and Clarke, L.E. (1985) J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 3, 26-35.49. Johnson, K., Parker, W.L. and Lory, S. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261,
15703-15708.50. Minnich, S.A. and Newton, A. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84,
1142-1146.51. Hirschmann, J., Wong, P.-K., Sei, K., Keener, J. and Kustu, S. (1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 7525-7529.52. Reitzer, L.J. and Magasanik, B. (1986) Cell 45, 785-792.53. Buck, M., Miller, S., Drumnond, H. and Dixon, R. (1986) Nature 320,
374-378.54. Pabo, C O . and Sauer, R.T. (1984) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 53, 293-321.55. Ninfa, A.J. and Magasanik, B. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83,
5909-5913.56. Walker, J.E., Saraste, M., Runswick, M.J. and Gay, N.J. (1982) EMBO
Journal 1, 945-952.57. Fry, D.C., Kuby, S.A. and Mildvin, A.S. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83, 907-911.58. Tabin, C.J., Bradley, E., Bargmann, C , Weinberg, R., Papageorge, A.,
Scolnick, E.M., Dhar, R., Lowy, "• and Chang, E. (1982) Nature 300,143-148.
59. Reddy, E.P., Reynolds, R.K., Santos, E. and Barbacid, M. (1982) Nature300, 149-152.
60. Zuckier, G. and Torriani, A. (1981) J. Bacteriol. 145, 1249-1256.61. Surin, B.P., Rosenberg, H. and Cox, G.B. (1985) J. Bacteriol. 161,
189-198.62. Amemura, M., Makino, K., Shinagawa, H., Koboyashi, A. and Nakata, A.
(1985) J. Mol. Biol. 184, 241-250.63. Shinagawa, H., Makino, K. and Nakata, A. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 168,
477-488.
7934
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/15/19/7921/1078535by gueston 06 April 2018