deep drawn aluminum cover fea stress and deflection

13
STIFFNESS AND STRENGTH OF FORMED DEEP DRAWN SHEET METAL FEA trade study 3/25/2016 Don Blanchet 3B Associates 339-234-3544 NRCM hydraulic presses

Upload: don-blanchet

Post on 15-Apr-2017

132 views

Category:

Engineering


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

STIFFNESS AND STRENGTH OF FORMED DEEP DRAWN

SHEET METALFEA trade study

3/25/2016Don Blanchet3B Associates339-234-3544

NRCM hydraulic presses

Page 2: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

GOALS – FEA simulations Examine various designs for a

large sheet metal cover used for a flight worthy rugged computer.

Requirements - analyses– Shock and vibration natural

frequency– weight– Deflection and stress under internal

pressurization of 1.0 psi

Page 3: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Design parameters 2024 aluminum .093 thick 36 x 36 inches Edge depth - 4.0 inches Center depth – 6.0 inches

Page 4: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Formed deep drawn

Page 5: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Formed deep drawn

Page 6: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Mode shape – Fn = 148hz

Page 7: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Max Deflection under internal pressure

Page 8: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Maximum stress

Page 9: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Radiused edges

Page 10: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Flat welded

Page 11: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Welded ribs

Page 12: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Summary of results

DesignThin shell0.1 inch

NaturalFrequency

hz

Weightlbs

Pressurized

Deflectioninches

MaximumStress

psi

flatwelded

31 22.0 0.79 13,740

Deep drawn

Design #1

148 19.5 0.03 3,100

FlatRadiused

edges26 21.6 0.38 8,420

weldedribs

44 22.6 0.40 14,960

Page 13: Deep Drawn Aluminum Cover FEA stress and deflection

Study conclusions Deep drawn design

– Highest natural frequency best in shock and vibration environments

– Lightest weight– Smallest deflection under pressure– Lowest stress

Disadvantage – high tooling cost