deepwater horizon - some observations oprofessor erik røsæg oscandinavian institute of maritime...

14
Deepwater Horizon - some observations o Professor Erik Røsæg o Scandinavian Institute of Maritime Law o [email protected] o folk.uio.no/erikro

Upload: claude-perkins

Post on 16-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Deepwater Horizon- some observations

oProfessor Erik RøsægoScandinavian Institute of Maritime Law

[email protected]/erikro

2

The parties

o BP – operator

o Transocean – owner of rig

oHalliburton – cement contractor

o Cameron - owner of blow-out preventer

3

Criminal and administrative penalties

oNegligent pollution is an offenceoClean Water Act 33 USC 26 III

oWhich negligence standard?

4

Civil liability and limitation

o OPA= 33 USC 40 I; CWA = 33 USC 26 IIIo Strict statutory liability to USCGo Torts

o Strict liabilityo TransOcean not responsible for spills directly

from the well (after average)?o Feinberg fund

o Secure claimso More liberal than courtso Requires settlement with BPo USD 20 bn; 3 bn actually paid in

o Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (26 USC I 98 A)

5

Limitation

o Separate limits for USCGo Transocean has filed for limitation for

death/personal injuries (46 USC App 8; Jones Act = 46 USC III § 30104)

o No other filings for limitation at this stageo Breaking of limits – violated federal safety

regulationso Personal injuries: Value of vessel after incident +

pending freighto USD 75 millo USD 26.8 mill paid to Transocean from hull insurers

o Adverse publicityo OPA limits (33 USC 40 I § 2704)o Reform proposals

6

The problem of frivolous claims

o “Spillionaires”o “Vessels of opportunity”o Ice to vessel engaged in

skimming

7

Claims – principles

o Hadley v Baxendale – remoteness (156 E.R. 145; (1854) 9 Ex. 341)

o Robins Drydock & Repair Co. v. Flint – proprietary interest (275 U.S. 303)

o OPA loss of profits recoverable if “due to …” (33 USC 40 I § 2702)

o Jones Act –potential dependents (wife of deceased 9 months pregnant)

o Mitigation o Ignorance of law – TV ads, billboards etco Retroactive law reforms?

8

Claims – natural resources

oNatural resourcesoRestoring (how to clean the

wetlands?)o Loss of useoAlternative amenities

o Long term ecological effects (cp. herring not returned to Prince Williams Sound)

o Possible oil at sea bottom

9

Claims – public bodies

o Loss of taxesoUse of public servants (firemen

etc)

10

Claims - other

oMoratorium of drilling – loss of other oil companies

o Loss of ‘way of life’o Indochinese refugeesoDecrease in bikini waxingo Strip clubs in the town of

Hummer

11

Direct action against insurers in Louisiana

o BP insurance strategy(1993) 6 JACF 3, 4-15

o Accident in Louisianao International watersoEEZ irrelevant

o Policy entered into or delivered in Louisiana (La RS 22:1269)

12

Recourse

o Knock for knockoWillful misconduct or gross

negligence

13

Removal organization

o Preident – USCG – on scene coorinator (local czar)

o Jones Act – cabotage exception(46 USC V D § 55113)

o Role of BP

14

Procedure

oMulti-district litigation panelo Consolidated in New Orleans