defence infrastructure organisation land quality ...... · figure 1 – site location plan (drawing...
TRANSCRIPT
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
Defence Infrastructure Organisation Land Quality Assessment Combined Phase 1 & Phase 2 GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot Final
July 2013 Contract Number: FTS3/ELMG/101
Land Quality Assessment
Combined Phase 1 And 2
GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
Final Defence Infrastructure Organisation Prepared by Atkins Limited for
Estates Management Central The Ministry of Defence
Kingston Road Defence Infrastructure Organisation
Sutton Coldfield under contract number
B75 7RL FTS3/ELMG/101
This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for the Defence Infrastructure Organisation’s information and use in relation to the Combined Phase 1 and 2 Land Quality Assessment for the GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot.
Document History Job number: 5106238 Document ref: Kelmarsh PSD Combined Phase 1/2 LQA
Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 2.0 Final M L NW E July 2013
TASK OFFICER
---------------------------------
PROJECT SPONSOR
----------------------------------
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
3
Table of Contents Chapter Pages Land Quality Statement i 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Terms of Reference 1 1.2. Objectives 1 1.3. Methodology 1 1.4. Scope of Work and Sources of Information 2 1.5. Structure of this Report 3
2. Site Description and Setting 4 2.1. Site Location 4 2.2. Surrounding Area 4 2.3. Site Description 4 2.4. Site History 6 2.5. Environmental Setting 7 2.6. Site Sensitivity 8 3. Preliminary Conceptual Site Model 9 3.1. Potential Sources of Contamination 9 3.2. Potential Receptors 9 3.3. Preliminary Phase 1 Environmental Risk Assessment 11 3.4. Preliminary Conceptual Site Model for Investigation 11 4. Site Investigation 14 4.1. Objectives 14 4.2. Methodology 14 4.3. Investigation Findings 16
5. Assessment of Risks 19 5.1. Introduction 19 5.2. Tier 2 Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment 19 5.3. Risk Assessment Summary 22 6. Conclusions 24 6.1. Overall Land Quality 24 6.2. Environmental Risks 24 6.3. Suitability of Investigated Areas for Continued Use 25
Figures Figure 1 – Site Location Plan (Drawing 5106238-DWG-021)
Figure 2 – Site Layout Plan & Potential Sources of Contamination (Drawing 5106238-DWG-022)
Figure 3 – Preliminary Conceptual Site Model for Site Investigation (Drawing 5106238-DWG-023)
Figure 4 – Exploratory Hole Location Plan (Drawing 5106238-DWG-024)
Figure 5 – Revised Conceptual Site Model (Drawing 5106238-DWG-025)
Appendices Appendix A - Envirocheck
Appendix B – Historical Maps
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
4
Appendix C – Environmental Risk Assessment Classification Tables
Appendix D - Site Investigation Factual Report
Appendix E – Laboratory Results
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
i
Land Quality Statement Introduction and Terms of Reference Atkins Limited (Atkins) was instructed by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) branch of the Ministry of Defence (MOD) to carry out a Combined Phase 1 and 2 Land Quality Assessment (LQA) of the Government Pipelines and Storage System (GPSS) Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot (PSD), (the Site) under contract FTS3/ELMG/101 between Atkins and DIO. This Combined Phase 1 and 2 LQA is required to assess the environmental quality of the Site and evaluate potential environmental liabilities from contamination associated with the Site.
Site Location and Surrounding Land Use This Site is located approximately 1.5km to the northeast of the village of Kelmarsh and 1.2km to the southwest of the village of Arthingworth in Northamptonshire. The approximate Ordnance Survey National Grid Reference for the Site is 474541 280680.
Surrounding land is predominantly open fields and woodlands
Site Description Kelmarsh PSD occupies approximately 6.57 hectares and is an irregular shaped parcel of land comprising approximately 95% grassland and 5% hardstanding. Most of the buildings are located in the south part of the Site by the entrance off Kelmarsh Road and underground and aboveground storage tanks are located in the centre and north.
The Site was used as a PSD with hydrocarbons pumped to the Site. The hydrocarbons were directed to a series of underground storage tanks (USTs) and then transported off the Site to the various end users, including RAF and military bases in Northamptonshire, by road and rail and later by pipeline. Atkins understands that the hydrocarbons stored included aviation fuel, kerosene and diesel.
Records indicate that the Site was decommissioned sometime in the 1990s.
Currently, the only Site activities are an active pipeline which runs in and out of the Site in the south by the Site entrance, together with the pipeline inspection gauge. The Site is now on ‘care and maintenance’.
Site History The Site was developed as a PSD in the 1940s and hydrocarbons supplied to the Site by pipeline and stored on-site in seven USTs. Distribution was by rail until the 1960s when the rail sidings were demolished. Road loading was in use until mothballing of the Site in the early 1990s when Site operations ceased.
Environmental Setting Published information shows the Site is underlain by Superficial Deposits (in the northeast) and Whitby Mudstone formation. Site-specific information from the Phase 2 Site Investigation indicates Made Ground is present in isolated areas to depths ranging from 0.70 to 1.90m below ground level (bgl) resting on natural strata comprising stiff clay and sand, possibly Superficial Deposits and/or totally weathered bedrock.
Superficial Deposits are a Secondary Aquifer and bedrock is Unproductive Strata. Groundwater has been detected at the Site at depths ranging from 0.7 to 2.49mbgl with a possible flow towards the southeast.
Site Sensitivity Receptors Sensitivity Summary Description
Groundwater Moderate Shallow groundwater is present in the Superficial Secondary Aquifer/or Bedrock. Surface Waters Moderate River Ise is within 250m
Flora/Fauna Low Ecological sensitivity is considered low because no designated ecological receptors have been identified within 1km of the Site
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
ii
Potential Sources of Contamination Atkins Phase 1 LQA identified a number of historic, on-site potentially contaminative activities from past operations including potential leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from tanks, pipework, loading areas, drums storage, workshops, generators, substations, interceptors and in Made Ground itself, although there was no documentary information or physical evidence to confirm that contamination was present from these potential sources. In addition, it was practice in the past to bury sediment from tank cleaning in pits, often called ‘graves’ and four are present on the Site.
On- and off-site humans, controlled waters and property (buildings and infrastructure) were identified as potential receptors to the sources of contamination listed above. Potential contaminant linkages (PCLs) were identified and subject to a preliminary qualitative environmental risk assessment.
Phase 2 Site Investigation PCLs related directly to past/current Site operations and considered to pose a potential moderate or high risk were investigated as part of the Phase 2 LQA. This comprised the advancing of ten window samples installed with combined groundwater/ground gas monitoring installations. Samples of soil and groundwater were analysed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylenes (BTEX), MTBE, tetraethyl and tetramethyl lead and asbestos.
A generic quantitative risk assessment (GQRA) for human, controlled waters and property receptors was carried out by comparison of soil and water concentration data with generic assessment criteria (GAC) for human receptors and controlled waters receptors assessed by comparison of groundwater concentration data with drinking water standards (DWS) for the groundwater receptor, and environmental quality standards (EQS) for the surface water receptor. Ground gas results were assessed for human and property receptors.
No asbestos was identified in the soil samples analysed. Visual and olfactory evidence of contamination, comprising hydrocarbon type odours, were observed in soil in AWS005 and AWS004, but contaminants in the soil samples analysed were either below the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) or the commercial/industrial land-use GAC.
Contaminants in groundwater samples were all reported below laboratory method detection limits.
The Characteristic Situation (CS) for carbon dioxide and methane was CS2 because of concentrations detected in AWS005.
Phase 2 Environmental Risk Assessment The environmental risk assessment is summarised below:
• a moderate risk has been identified to current/future construction/maintenance workers from contaminants in soil and groundwater even if they do not exceed the GAC because they may be in direct contact with contaminants when they are required to excavate and handle soil. However, this will be reduce to low risk if robust risk assessments are carried out to identify appropriate personnel protective equipment and suitable working methods to protect these receptors, in accordance with current guidance and recommended good working practices;
• a low risk has been identified to current/future on-site human receptors from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater;
• a low risk has been identified to current/future off-site human receptors from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater;
• a low risk has been identified to groundwater from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater; • a low risk has been identified to surface water from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater; • a low risk has been identified to current/future on-site human receptors from the methane/carbon dioxide
detected; • a low risk has been identified to current/future off-site human receptors from the methane/carbon dioxide
detected; • a negligible risk has been identified to on-site property from the contamination detected in the
soil/groundwater and a low risk from the methane detected; and • a negligible risk has been identified to off-site property from the contamination detected in the
soil/groundwater and a low risk from the methane detected.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
iii
It should be noted that the assessment of ground gas and groundwater risks has been based on one round of monitoring only and the ground gas CS could change if further monitoring was to be carried out. Identified risks to groundwater could increase or decrease based on further monitoring.
Overall Land Quality and Suitability for Use Based on the Combined Phase 1/2 LQA carried out, the Site is considered suitable for use as a PSD (i.e. commercial/industrial), although it should be noted that assessment of ground gas and groundwater associated risks are based on only one round of monitoring.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
1
1. Introduction 1.1. Terms of Reference
The Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) commissioned Atkins Limited (Atkins) to undertake a Combined Phase 1 and 2 Land Quality Assessment (LQA) of sites in the Government Pipelines and Storage System (GPSS) Portfolio under contract FTS3/ELMG/101 between Atkins and DIO. The GPSS is a UK pipeline system run by the Oil and Pipelines Agency (OPA) for the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and consists of approximately 2,500km of pipeline and associated facilities. The network, interconnected with several private networks, was constructed before WW2 to supply fuel for Operation Pluto.
This report relates to the Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot (PSD), hereafter also called the Site. The Site was used for the storage and distribution of hydrocarbons but was mothballed in the 1990s.
1.2. Objectives It is MOD policy to undertake a voluntary programme to ‘assess land quality across the defence estate’ to ‘provide a proper knowledge of the condition of the estate and ensure that it is ‘suitable for use’ and not causing harm to the environment. Where it is identified that unacceptable risk is posed by the presence of contamination, action must be taken to reduce and control the risks to an acceptable level’. The MOD has implemented the LQA process to achieve this aim and undertakes phased investigations where potential risks are identified to human and environmental receptors from contamination. This process is described in the DIO Practitioner Guide 07/121.
Objectives of this LQA are to determine potential environmental liabilities associated with each Site in the portfolio as part of the GPSS divestiture programme.
1.3. Methodology The initial phase of the LQA process is the Phase 1 LQA (Desk Study) which develops a preliminary conceptual site model (CSM). This describes the relationships between contaminants, pathways and receptors and identifies potential contaminant linkages (PCLs) where a source, pathway and receptor linkage is considered to exist. Based on the preliminary CSM and PCLs, potential unacceptable contamination risks associated with the Site can be identified. The Phase 2 LQA (Site/Ground Investigation) is carried out to investigate the PCLs and update the preliminary CSM.
This LQA Report sets out the factual information and other evidence gathered through a combined desk based assessment and site investigation relating to the environmental condition of the Site. The report establishes the overall Site condition by identifying and investigating PCLs and providing an appraisal of environmental risks, identifying potential unacceptable contamination risks and the interaction of those risks with the surrounding environment. This has informed potential environmental liabilities from contamination associated with the Site.
It is understood that the Site is effectively mothballed with fuel storage and loading facilities now inactive and the pipeline station being the only operational part of the Site. At this stage, proposed future use has not been identified. Therefore, for the purposes of the LQA, Atkins has assumed that proposed future use will remain the same as past use (PSD) and potential risks have been assessed for commercial and industrial end-use scenarios only.
1 Contaminated Land Management: Land Quality Assessment (LQA) Management Guide, 07/12, Estates Strategy and Policy Group, January 2013
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
2
1.4. Scope of Work and Sources of Information The following has been carried out:
• Phase 1 Desk Study comprising:
- Review of Envirocheck Report2 from the Landmark Information Group which included historical maps. The Envirocheck Report is presented as Appendix A and the Historical Maps as Appendix B;
- Review of current topographic Ordnance Survey (OS) map;
- Review of published geology including the Geology Datasheet included with the Envirocheck Report in Appendix A which is based on the British Geological Survey (BGS) geology map of Market Harborough3;
- Review of BGS website4;
- Review of Environment Agency5 , Northampton County Council and Daventry District Council6 websites;
- Review of the Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) website7;
- Review of readily available aerial photographs on the internet;
- Request for information from and discussion with Costain (Site Facility Management Company) and the Oil Pipeline Agency (OPA) regarding past operations, below and above ground tanks and pipework, drum storage areas (including petrol, oil and lubricant stores), waste arisings, handling and storage, water source and use, wastewater streams, treatment (for example interceptors and discharges), asbestos containing material, polychlorinated biphenyls in equipment and past pollution incidents; and
- Site Reconnaissance by Atkins and Costain (Facility Management Company) on 21st
September 2012 to carry out a detailed inspection of the Site and identify potential locations for and constraints with the Phase 2 Site Investigation.
• Phase 2 Site Investigation comprising:
- Project Set-up and Preparation. This has included all aspects of project set up and preparation for the works and preparation and agreement of the Design Brief/Method Statement for the Site investigation works, and
- Site Investigation, the details of which are summarised in Chapter 4 of this report;
• Environmental Risk Assessment, presented in Chapter 5 of this Report; and
• Reporting.
No previous reports were available for review but existing boreholes were noted on the Site. No photographs could be taken.
It should be noted that the Phase 1 information confirmed that the Site had not been used for MoD purposes in the past. As such, Atkins considered that it was not necessary to obtain a Defence Radiological Protection Services (DRPS) Radiological Desk Study Report, explosive ordnance clearance documentation or carry out further enquiries into the potential for burning grounds or MoD specific contaminants to be present.
The work has been carried out with due regard for UK national and regional policies relevant to the assessment and industry standards, guidance and codes of conduct.
2 Envirocheck Report Number 41006971_1__1, Landmark Information Group, August 2012 3 Geology Map number 170 of Market Harborough, British Geological Survey, 1968 4http://bgs.ac.uk 5http://environment-agency.gov.uk 6 http//:www.northamptonshire.gov.uk and www.daventrydc.gov.uk 7 http://www.magic.gov.uk
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
3
1.5. Structure of this Report This report has been structured as follows:
• Chapter 2 presents the Phase 1 LQA findings including a description of the Site, location and surrounding land, layout, operations and history, together with environmental setting and Site sensitivity, based primarily on information collected as part of the Phase 1 LQA data sources;
• Chapter 3 identifies potential sources of contamination, receptors and pathways based on the Phase 1 LQA data sources and presented the preliminary CSM (PCSM);
• Chapter 4 describes the Phase 2 Site Investigation carried out and investigation findings;
• Chapter 5 presents the environmental risk assessment; and
• Chapter 6 presents the conclusions of this Combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 LQA.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
4
2. Site Description and Setting 2.1. Site Location
This Site is located approximately 1.5km to the northeast of the village of Kelmarsh and 1.2km to the southwest of the village or Arthingworth in Northamptonshire. The approximate Ordnance Survey National Grid Reference for the Site is 474541 280680. A Site location plan is enclosed as Figure 1 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-021).
2.2. Surrounding Area Surrounding land is predominantly open fields and woodlands:
• North: Open agricultural land is adjacent to the north with the River Ise, which flows from southwest to northeast, approximately 250m to the north. Arthingworth Lodge is approximately 250m to the northeast;
• East: Open agricultural land is adjacent to the east and Kelmarsh Road which runs from northeast to southwest, is approximately 150m to the east and adjacent to the southeast;
• South: Open agricultural land is adjacent to the south beyond Kelmarsh Road. A disused railway line is adjacent to the south-southwest on the far side of Kelmarsh Road with Stable Farm (formerly Kelmarsh Arms) approximately 50m to the south-southwest; and
• West: A disused railway line (Brampton Valley Way Linear Park) forms the west Site boundary with open agricultural land to the west, Langborough Wood is approximately 250m to the southwest and the River Ise is approximately 250m to the west.
No statutory Contaminated Land Register entries or notices are recorded on or within 1km of the Site. No historic/active landfill entries are noted on or within 1km of the Site.
2.3. Site Description The Site description below has been based on review of the data listed in Chapter 1, discussion with Costain/OPA and Atkins Site Reconnaissance.
2.3.1. Site Layout Kelmarsh PSD occupies approximately 6.57 hectares and is an irregular shaped parcel of land comprising approximately 95% grassland and 5% hardstanding. Most of the buildings are located in the south part of the Site by the entrance off Kelmarsh Road. The Site layout is shown in Figure 2 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-022) and comprises:
• pipeline in the south by the Site entrance;
• former Site office, mess room, control room and workshop in the southwest, to the west of the roadway into the Site;
• former road loading area in the southeast by the Site entrance;
• former Foam Store in the southwest, to the north of the former offices;
• former storage building to the southeast by the Site entrance;
• interceptors in the south by the Site entrance;
• former fire pump tank and concrete lined emergency water supply (EWS) tank to the north of the former offices by the west Site boundary;
• former pump house and additive manifold in the centre southeast and former manifold and valve compounds in the east;
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
5
• five former “slops” underground storage tanks (UST), former lube oil tanks and former generator room in the centre southwest;
• former rail sidings (running northwest to southeast) in the centre, noted as mounded and comprising Made Ground. This included a former rail loading gantry but the sidings and branch line were dismantled in the 1960s;
• seven USTs in the north, aligned northwest to south east, with a row of four in the south and a row of three in the north;
• former Foam Store to the northwest and concrete lined EWS to the southwest of the USTs; and
• tetraethyl lead pits, two to the north and two to the south of the USTs.
Buildings were of brick construction and generally single storey, with boarded windows and were locked. Compounds were generally of concrete construction.
2.3.2. Site Activities The Site was constructed during the 1940s and used as a PSD with hydrocarbons pumped to the Site. The hydrocarbons were directed to a series of USTs then transported off the Site to the various end users, including RAF and military bases in Northamptonshire, by road and rail and later by pipeline. Atkins understands that the hydrocarbons stored included aviation fuel, kerosene and diesel.
Records indicate that the Site was decommissioned sometime in the 1990s.
Currently, the only Site activities are an active pipeline which runs in and out of the Site in the south by the Site entrance, together with the pipeline inspection gauge (PIG). The Site is considered by the OPA as on ‘care and maintenance’.
2.3.3. Underground Storage Tanks and Pipework There are seven, circular, 3000m3 capacity USTs in the north which were used to store the hydrocarbons listed above (aviation fuel, kerosene and diesel.). The tanks are covered with earth and camouflaged with grass. Each UST has vents and monitoring equipment on the topside. Access/maintenance tunnels are located in the vicinity of each UST.
Five 30’ x 9’ slop USTs are located in the vicinity of the manifold compounds. These tanks are reported to be orientated vertically, concrete lined and are covered by earth.
These USTs are understood to be empty, having been mothballed since the early 1990s.
No visual or olfactory indications of contamination or surface staining were noted during Atkins Reconnaissance.
2.3.4. Aboveground Storage Tanks and Pipework A former lube oil aboveground storage tank (AST) is located to the west of the slop tanks. This formerly contained lube oil.
No visual or olfactory indications of contamination or surface staining were noted during Atkins Reconnaissance.
2.3.5. Drum Storage OPA/Costain was not able to provide details of the former drum stores on-site, such as those used to store petrol, oil and lubricants. However, there are two former Foam Stores still present. These comprise single- storey, brick buildings with locked access doors.
No visual or olfactory indications of contamination or surface staining were noted during Atkins Reconnaissance. However, 205-litres drums (over 20, some of which are full) of multiple processed fuel oil (PFO) were present on concrete by the road side in the west part of Site.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
6
2.3.6. Waste The Site has not been operational for 20+ years and no wastes are generated currently. Costain/OPA had no records of waste arisings and management when operational other than stating that slops were stored and the interceptor required regular emptying.
It should be noted that it was practice in the past to bury sediment from tank cleaning in pits, often called ‘graves’. Four tetraethyl lead pits were identified.
No visual or olfactory indications of contamination or surface staining were noted during Atkins’ Site Reconnaissance.
2.3.7. Water The Site has not been operational for 20+ years and no water used currently. However, it was from mains supply and likely to be used for domestic/washing/sanitary when the Site was in use, although there are no extant records.
2.3.8. Wastewater, Interceptors and Sumps Sanitary wastewater was generated but there are no records to indicate where it was discharged. Surface water run-off, roof run-off and rainwater were directed to an interceptor located in the south of the Site. Site drainage was reported to discharge via a channel into a ditch to the southeast of the Site.
No visual or olfactory indications of contamination or surface staining were noted during Atkins’ Site Reconnaissance.
2.3.9. Asbestos and Polychlorinated Biphenyls Some of the buildings on the Site are signed as containing asbestos. However, Costain/OPA was not able to provide an asbestos register for the Site.
Costain/OPA has not been able to confirm whether polychlorinated biphenyls were present in electrical equipment. It was not possible to inspect electrical equipment because buildings were locked and not necessarily safe to enter.
2.3.10. Recorded Pollution Incidents No visual or olfactory indications of contamination or surface staining were noted during Atkins visit. Costain/OPA had no records of past pollution incidents.
2.4. Site History The Site was developed as a PSD in the 1940s and hydrocarbons supplied to the Site by pipeline and stored on-site in seven USTs. Distribution was by rail until the 1960s when the rail sidings were demolished. Road loading was in use until mothballing of the Site in the early 1990s when Site operations ceased.
2.4.1. On-site Date: Scale Land Use
1885: 1:10,560 Site comprises agriculture land. A portion of the railway embankment of the London and North Western Railway is present in the southwest corner of Site.
1886: 1:2,500 No apparent change. 1900: 1:2,500 No apparent change. 1901: 1:10,5600 No apparent change. 1926: 1:2,500 No apparent change. 1927: 1:10,5600 No apparent change. 1952: 1:10,000 Railway siding entering the Site from the west. No further Site features
apparent (it should be noted maps of this era had all military camps and other strategic Sites removed).
1958: 1:10,000 No Site features apparent (it should be noted maps of this era had all
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
7
Date: Scale Land Use military camps and other strategic Sites removed).
1968:1:2,500 Site road layout, buildings, tank topography and sidings clearly shown. Site described as Depot.
1970 – 1971: 1:10,000 Topography associated with development of Site as a PSD. Site labelled as a depot.
1994: 1:2,500 Sidings no longer apparent on-site. 2006: 1:10,000 No apparent change. 2012: 1:10,000 No apparent change.
2.4.2. Surrounding Area Date: Scale Land Use
1885: 1:10,560 Surrounding area mainly consists of agricultural land and woodland. Langborough Wood shown to the southwest. River Ise shown approximately 250m to the west and north. London and North Western Railway adjacent to the west and southwest border of Site. Kelmarsh Station located on the southwest corner/border of the Site. A Brick Field shown approximately 50m to the southwest. A public house (Railway Arms) shown approximately 50m to the south-southwest of the Site entrance. Arthingworth Lodge shown approximately 250m to the northeast.
1886: 1:2,500 No apparent change. 1900: 1:2,500 No apparent change. 1901: 1:10,560 Various springs shown within 300m of the Site to the north, west and south.
The Brick Field shown as Brick Works with excavation up to the west boundary of the railway.
1926: 1:2,500 No apparent change. 1927: 1:10,560 Allotments shown approximately 500m to the northeast.
Brick Works to the southwest now labelled as disused. 1952: 1:10,000 No apparent changes. 1958: 1:10,000 No apparent changes. 1968: 1:2,500 Kelmarsh Station no longer present. 1970 – 1971: 1:10,000 A disused wind pump shown approximately 250m to the north of the Site. 1994: 1:2,500 No apparent change. 2006: 1:10,000 A pond shown in the area of former clay pit and ponds present at
Arthingworth Lodge. 2012: 1:10,000 Public house has now been replaced with a residential dwelling.
2.5. Environmental Setting
2.5.1. Topography Topographically, the Site is located on a slight hill, ranging from an elevation of 110m to 132m above ordnance datum (AOD). The highest point of the hill is located slightly to the north of the centre of the Site and levels slope gently down in all directions.
2.5.2. Geology Published geological information indicates that the Site is underlain by:
• Superficial Deposits: Glaciofluvial Deposits under the northeast corner of the Site; and
• Bedrock: The Site is underlain by the Whitby Mudstone formation (Lower Jurassic).
Geological information has not indicated the presence of Made Ground. However, Made Ground could be present under the Site, possibly imported during Site construction.
2.5.3. Hydrogeology
2.5.3.1. Aquifer and Soil Classification Superficial Deposits in the northeast are classed as a Secondary A Aquifer overlain by soil of low leaching potential. Bedrock is classed as Unproductive Strata. There are three existing boreholes
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
8
on-site. The locations are shown on Figure 2 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-022). Two of these were dipped and water levels were between 0.68 and 4.33m below ground level (bgl).
2.5.3.2. Abstractions and Groundwater Source Protection Zones There are no current, licensed groundwater abstractions or consents to discharge to ground on or within 500m of the Site.
The Site does not lie within a groundwater Source Protection Zone.
2.5.3.3. Pollution Incidents to Groundwater There are no recorded pollution incidents to groundwater on or within 500m of the Site.
2.5.4. Hydrology The River Ise flows from southwest to northeast approximately 250m to the north and west. The River Ise has a River Quality Grade B (good).
2.5.4.1. Abstractions and Discharge consents There are no current, licensed surface water abstractions or consents to discharge to surface water on or within 500m of the Site.
2.5.4.2. Pollution Incidents to Controlled Water No recorded pollution incidents to surface water have been identified on or within 500m of the Site.
2.5.4.3. Flood Risk Environment Agency information indicates that no part of the Site lies within an area at risk of flooding from rivers without defences (Zone 3) or extreme flood events from rivers and sea without defences (Zone 2).
2.5.5. Other Environmental Information The Site is situated within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone
Information from the BGS National Geoscience Information Service indicates that the Site is located within a radon affected area, because between 5% and 10% of homes are above action level for radon. According to the information no radon protection measures are considered necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensions.
2.6. Site Sensitivity 2.6.1. Groundwater
Groundwater sensitivity is considered moderate because shallow groundwater is present in the Superficial Secondary Aquifer.
2.6.2. Surface Water Surface water sensitivity is considered moderate because the River Ise is within 250m.
2.6.3. Ecological Systems Ecological sensitivity is considered low because no designated ecological receptors have been identified within 1km of the Site.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
9
3. Preliminary Conceptual Site Model 3.1. Potential Sources of Contamination
3.1.1. Current on-site Activities/Operations The Site has been mothballed since the 1990s and tanks and buildings emptied and decommissioned. There is one active pipeline which enters and exits the Site but this is maintained/monitored closely for leaks.
Therefore, no current, potentially contaminative on-site sources of contamination have been identified, although, unless removed, there is the potential for spillage from the PFO drums currently stored outside on concrete but with no other secondary containment.
3.1.2. Historical On-site Activities/Operations A number of historic, on-site, potentially contaminative activities have been identified, although there is no documentary information or physical evidence to confirm that contamination is present from these potential sources:
1. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from USTs and associated pipework. 2. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the ASTs, valves, manifolds, pumps and associated pipework. 3. Former rail and road loading areas (including potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the areas and associated pipework). 4. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons and foam from the drum storage areas. 5. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the interceptor/drains. 6. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the former generator, substation and workshop. 7. Presence of contamination in the tetraethyl lead sludge pits. 8. Potential for contaminants to be present in Made Ground which may have been imported to facilitate construction together with organic contaminants associated with the former railway sidings and railway track along the west boundary.
These potential sources are shown on Figure 2 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-022).
3.1.3. Current Off-site Activities/Operations Surrounding land is predominantly fields with the occasional house. These are not considered to be potentially contaminative activities which could give rise to contaminants in, on or under the land at the Site.
Therefore, no current, off-site potentially contaminative activities have been identified.
3.1.4. Historical Off-site Activities/Operations Historical surrounding land was predominantly fields with occasional house and a former railway line to the west. Fields and houses are not considered to be potentially contaminative activities which could have given rise to contaminants in, on or under the land at the Site.
The Brick Works and associated excavations to the west have not been infilled. As such, these are not considered a potentially contaminative off-site activity. Contaminants associated with the railway track have already been considered as a potential on-site source.
3.2. Potential Receptors
3.2.1. Human Receptors Potential, current on-site human receptors include the occasional facility management workers who access the Site. The potential, future on-site human receptors will either remain the same as
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
10
current (occasional occasional facility management workers) or comprise workers (including construction workers) and visitors to the Site if reuse commences.
These potential current/future on-site human receptors could be exposed to potential contamination by the following pathways:
• dermal contact with contaminants in soil, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in shallow groundwater if excavation takes place below the groundwater table;
• ingestion of contaminants in soil, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in shallow groundwater if excavation takes place below the groundwater table;
• inhalation of contaminants in soil-derived dust from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed; and
• inhalation of hydrocarbon vapours/ground gas.
Potential current/future off-site human receptors include farm workers in adjacent fields and occupants of/visitors to Stable Farm to the southwest. These potential current/future off-site human receptors could be exposed to potential contamination by the following pathways:
• dermal contact with contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in migrating groundwater if off-site excavation takes place below the groundwater table;
• ingestion of contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in migrating groundwater if off-site excavation takes place below the groundwater table;
• inhalation of contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed; and
• inhalation of migrating hydrocarbon vapours/ground gas.
3.2.2. Controlled Waters Receptors Groundwater in the Superficial Deposits and Bedrock (if present) is a potential receptor by leaching of contaminants from the unsaturated soil zone to groundwater and migration of light non aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL).
The River Ise a potential surface water receptor by discharge of contaminants in drains and laterally migrating groundwater and LNAPL. The river is approximately 250m from the Site and too far for discharge of contaminants in surface water run-off.
3.2.3. Ecological Receptors No designated ecological receptors that have been identified on or within 500m of the Site.
3.2.4. Other Receptors Livestock are grazed adjacent to the Site and could be exposed by exposed by:
• dermal contact with contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off;
• ingestion of contaminants in grass, windblown, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off;
• inhalation of contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust; and
• inhalation of migrating hydrocarbon vapours/ground gas.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
11
3.2.5. Property Receptors On-site buildings/infrastructure are also a potential current/future property receptor by direct contact with contaminants in soil and shallow groundwater and accumulation of ground gas.
Off-site property (buildings/infrastructure) includes Stable Farm to the southwest by direct contact with contaminants in migrating shallow groundwater and accumulation of migrating ground gas.
3.3. Preliminary Phase 1 Environmental Risk Assessment A preliminary environmental risk has been carried out following current best practice and industry guidance. Definitions of probability and consequence have been based on guidance in the DIO Practitioners Guide 07/12 and are summarised in Appendix C. A combination of probability and consequence produces a risk level based on the risk evaluation and likely action required. The DIO Practitioners Guide 07/12 provides seven categories of risk as shown in Appendix C. The land contamination risk, which is a function of the probability and the consequence, can then be defined using the risk matrix in Appendix C.
Based on the information reviewed as part of Atkins’ Phase 1 LQA, potential sources of contamination have been identified and a preliminary CSM developed, together with PCLs or source-receptor-pathway linkages. The preliminary CSM is summarised in Table 3.1 and shown on Figure 3 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-023).
A preliminary environmental risk assessment for the Site has been carried out and the potential sources of contamination identified at the Site are considered to pose a:
• moderate risk to current/future facility management workers on-site;
• moderate risk to future workers/visitors on-site if the Site is re-opened;
• moderate/low risk to current/future off-site human receptors;
• moderate risk to current/future construction/maintenance workers on-site;
• high risk to groundwater;
• moderate risk to surface water;
• moderate/low risk to on-site property;
• moderate/low risk to off-site property; and
• negligible risk to off-site livestock.
3.4. Preliminary Conceptual Site Model for Investigation Atkins’ site investigation forming the Phase 2 LQA, in particular the chemical analysis suite selected, has focussed on those sources associated with the Site’s operation as a PSD, specifically petroleum products because these are considered to be the principal potential contaminants at the Site and those considered to potentially pose a risk.
Analysis for metals and other inorganic compounds which could be present in, for example, Made Ground, did not form part of Atkins’ proposed scope of work in our bid and as such, has not been carried out. This is also the case for contaminants associated with potential off-site sources of contamination which are also excluded from the Phase 2 LQA site investigation design. The objective of the Phase 2 LQA has been to focus on the potential risks and potential environmental liability posed by the Site operations and off-site sources are considered to be the liability of the off-site polluter. In addition, discharge of contaminants in Site drains to surface water is considered a facility management issue and has not been considered further as a pathway on this basis.
Therefore, Source 8 and discharge to surface water in drains have not been investigated as part of the Phase 2 LQA. The preliminary qualitative environmental risk assessment has identified a
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
12
negligible risk to off-site livestock. Therefore, off-site livestock have not been investigated as part of the Phase 2 LQA on this basis.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
13
Table 3.1: Preliminary Conceptual Site Model
Source of Contamination Receptors Pathways
Historic On-site Activities/Operations 1. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from USTs and associated pipework. 2. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the ASTs, valves, manifolds, pumps and associated pipework. 3. Former rail and road loading areas (including potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the areas and associated pipework). 4. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons and foam from the drum storage areas. 5. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the interceptor/drains. 6. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the former generator, substation and workshop. 7. Presence of contamination in the tetraethyl lead sludge pits. 8. Potential for contaminants to be present in Made Ground which may have been imported to facilitate construction together with organic contaminants associated with the former railway sidings and railway track along the west boundary.
Humans On-site: Current/Future Facility Management Workers Future Site Workers/Visitors (if Site is reopened) Current/Future Construction/Maintenance Workers
Dermal contact with contaminants in soil, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in shallow groundwater if excavation takes place below the groundwater table. Ingestion of contaminants in soil, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in shallow groundwater if excavation takes place below the groundwater table. Inhalation of contaminants in soil-derived dust from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed. Inhalation of vapours/ground gas.
Humans Off-site Current/Future occupants of/visitors to Stable Farm and farm workers
Dermal contact with contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in migrating groundwater if off-site excavation takes place below the groundwater table Ingestion of contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed and in migrating groundwater if off-site excavation takes place below the groundwater table. Inhalation of contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust from areas where soil (and contaminant) is exposed. Inhalation of migrating vapours/ground gas.
Groundwater Leaching of contaminants from the unsaturated soil zone to groundwater and migration of LNAPL.
Surface Water (River Ise) Discharge of contaminants in laterally migrating groundwater and migration of LNAPL.
Property On-site (buildings/infrastructure)
Direct contact with contaminants in soil/groundwater. Accumulation of migrating ground gas into the buildings and enclosed spaces.
Property Off-site (buildings/infrastructure)
Direct contact with contaminants in migrating groundwater. Accumulation of migrating ground gas into buildings and enclosed spaces.
Other Receptors Off-site (Livestock)
Dermal contact with contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off. Ingestion of contaminants in windblown soil, soil-derived dust and entrained in surface water run-off. Inhalation of contaminants in windblown, soil-derived dust. Inhalation of migrating vapours/ground gas.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
14
4. Site Investigation 4.1. Objectives
The site investigation was undertaken as part of Combined Phase 1/2 LQA to provide site-specific factual data relating to the ground conditions, soil chemistry, groundwater quality, presence of vapours/ground gas and investigation the PCLs identified by the preliminary CSM and preliminary environmental risk assessment.
4.2. Methodology
4.2.1. General Approach Atkins Phase 2 LQA Site Investigation was designed with reference to UK guidance. This included: i) CLR11; ii) British Standard (BS) 101758; iii) BS59309; iv) R&D Technical Report P5-065/TR10; v) R&D Technical Report P5-066/TR11; and vi) CLR412.
BS10175 suggests a Phase 2 exploratory investigation should be both targeted and non-targeted, the latter typically at 25 to 50m centres adopting a square or herringbone grid as recommended in CLR4. A Phase 3 main investigation should also be both targeted and non-targeted, the latter typically at 10 to 25m centres, again adopting a square or a herringbone grid as recommended in CLR4. The Stage 1 investigation of P5-066/TR suggests 50m centres.
Based on the use of the Site, guidance quoted above and likely constraints in terms of accessible locations, Atkins has adopted a targeted investigation as described in Table 4.1 below.
Table 4.1: Rationale for the Investigation Locations
Location Rationale
AWS001 Down gradient of interceptor, road loading area and drum storage - Sources 3, 4 and 5. AWS002 Down gradient of slop tanks – Source 2. AWS003 Down gradient of manifold compound and lube oil tanks – Sources 2 and 6 AWS004 Down gradient of main storage tanks and former rail loading/sidings – Sources 1 to 3. AWS005 Down gradient of main storage tanks and former rail loading/sidings – Sources 1 to 3. AWS006 Down gradient of main storage tanks and former rail loading/sidings – Sources 1 to 3. AWS007 Down gradient of main storage tanks and former rail loading/sidings – Sources 1 to 3. AWS008 Down gradient of main storage tanks and secondary rail loading/siding – Sources 1 to 3. AWS009 Down gradient of main storage tanks and in tetraethyl lead pit – Sources 1 to 3 and 7. AWS010 Down gradient of main storage tanks and in tetraethyl lead pit Sources 1 to 3 and 7
The intrusive works was undertaken by Geotechnical Engineering Limited (GEL) between 29/10/2012 and 30/10/2012 and consisted of 10 targeted window sampler boreholes which were drilled by a percussive based “Terrier” rig to depths of 5mbgl. Locations are shown on Figure 4 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-024).
All 10 boreholes were completed as groundwater monitoring installations to facilitate the collection of groundwater samples and ground gas monitoring.
Each borehole location was cleared for underground services prior to drilling by a utility clearance company. In addition, a hand-dug pit was excavated to approximately 1.2mbgl before drilling commenced.
8 British Standard 10175, Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites, 2001/2010 9 BS5930, Code of Practice for Site Investigation, 1999 10 R&D Technical Report P5-065/TR, Technical Aspects of Site Investigation, Environment Agency, 2000 11 R&D Technical Report P5-066/TR, Development of Appropriate Soil Sampling Strategies for Land Contamination, Environment Agency, 2000 12 Contaminated Land Report 4, Sampling Strategies for Contaminated Land, Environment Agency, 1994
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
15
4.2.2. Investigation Locations and General Details Locations of the window sampler boreholes were surveyed to National Grid co-ordinates and elevations to Ordnance Datum. The locations of the windowless sampling boreholes are presented on Figure 4 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-024). The borehole records are presented in Appendix D.
All standpipe installations in the windowless sampler boreholes comprised a 50mm diameter pipe and the screened response zone was surrounded by a gravel filter pack. The top of the installations were completed with bentonite seals and cement, with raised lockable steel covers. Installation construction details are provided on the borehole records in Appendix D.
4.2.3. Soil Sampling The sampling strategy was designed to obtain representative soil samples from each stratum encountered. Representative soil samples were stored in containers under appropriate conditions prior to onward transmission to the laboratory, with chain of custody documentation for environmental samples.
Soil samples were recovered from all exploratory holes advanced on the Site. Typically samples were recovered at 0.3m, 0.5m and 1mbgl with further samples every metre and/or at change of strata. Additional samples were taken if any visual or olfactory evidence of contamination was observed. Soil samples comprised one 250ml and one 60ml glass jars which were kept in cool boxes and were dispatched to the appointed, accredited chemical analysis laboratory, i2 Analytical, under chain of custody conditions within 48 hours of sampling.
4.2.4. Groundwater Monitoring Groundwater samples were obtained on 16th January 2013 as part of a post works monitoring exercise to determine the quality of the groundwater. Depth to groundwater and the presence/absence (and thickness) of LNAPL were recorded using an interface probe. If no LNAPL was noted, each well was purged of up to three wells volumes prior to sampling. Representative water samples were taken immediately on completion of purging and placed in laboratory provided containers under appropriate conditions prior to onward transmission to the laboratory, with chain of custody documentation.
4.2.5. Vapour/Ground Gas Monitoring Soil vapour monitoring was undertaken during the ground investigation on each environmental sample collected. The soil vapour monitoring was recorded using a Mini-Rae 2000 calibrated with 100 parts per million (ppm) isobutylene. This instrument is designed to give an indication of the presence and semi-quantitative concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the soil vapour.
Monitoring was undertaken after the soil samples had been collected and placed within the sampling jars allowing for potential vapours to accumulate within the headspace of the sampling jars. The peak value in ppm was recorded and is included on the borehole records presented within Appendix D.
One round of ground gas monitoring was undertaken on 16th January 2013 as part of a post works monitoring programme methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, oxygen and flow rate. Ground gas was monitored using a GA-2000. Ground gas monitoring results are presented in Appendix D.
4.2.6. Laboratory Analysis Soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation were dispatched to and received by I2 Analytical Ltd within 48 hours of sampling. Twenty soil and nine groundwater samples were scheduled for testing as described below.
Soil Testing Suite – List of Contaminants
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
16
• Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) Criteria Working Group (CWG);
• USEPA 16 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs);
• Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene And Xylenes (BTEX) and MTBE;
• Tetramethyl Lead;
• Tetraethyl Lead;
• pH;
• Fraction of Organic Carbon (FOC); and
• Asbestos Screen.
Water Testing Suite – List of Contaminants
• TPH CWG;
• USEPA 16 PAHs;
• BTEX and MTBE;
• pH;
• Tetramethyl Lead; and
• Tetraethyl Lead.
Results are presented in Appendix E. The testing suite selected, as indicated in Atkins original proposal, focussed specifically on the principal contaminants likely to be associated with a PSD as demonstrated by the suite described above, together with soil parameters (FOC) and asbestos because of the potential from the former rail activities and Atkins standard procedures requires analysis of all samples for asbestos as a matter of course. Analysis for metals and other inorganic compounds did not form part of Atkins’ proposed scope of work and as such, has not been carried out.
4.3. Investigation Findings
4.3.1. Topsoil Topsoil was encountered at all 10 locations across the Site. It ranged from thicknesses of 0.1m to 0.3m (AWS003, AWS008 and AWS009).
4.3.2. Made Ground Made Ground was encountered in six of the 10 locations. It ranged from a thickness of 0.7m (AWS007) to 1.9m (AWS005). The Made Ground consisted of reworked natural soils that contained gravels of flint and brick. Bitumen gravel was encountered between 0.5 and 1.4mbgl in AWS002, possibly a former area of tarmac since broken up.
Window sampler boreholes in the rail sidings/loading (AWS004 to AWS008) encountered Made Ground described as black, ashy sandy, gravel containing slag and clinker between 0.1 and 0.8mbgl.
Hydrocarbon type odours were noted between 1 and 2mbgl in ASW005 in the former rail sidings/loading area with soil vapour readings of 64.4ppm.
4.3.3. Natural Strata Natural strata were encountered in all locations. These were directly under topsoil in AWS001, AWS003, AWS009 and AWS010 and under Made Ground in remaining six boreholes.
Natural strata generally consisted of stiff brown/grey, sandy clay with occasional sand lenses and gravel size pockets of gypsum. These may be totally weathered bedrock.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
17
A band of sand was only recorded in AWS010 below 3.9mbgl. This borehole is in the northeast and these may be Superficial Deposits.
Slight hydrocarbon type odours were noted between 1.5 and 2.5mbgl in AWS004 in the east of the Site, although soil vapour readings were only 5.8ppm to 12.1ppm. Slight hydrocarbon odours were noted in AWS005 between 1.9 and 2.0mbgl in the centre of the Site, with a soil vapour reading of 2.5ppm recorded.
4.3.4. Groundwater Groundwater was only encountered in AWS009 (1.3mbgl in natural strata) and AWS010 (3.6mbgl in natural strata) during drilling but was recorded in all boreholes during the monitoring. Details are presented in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Water Levels during Monitoring
Location Stratum Screened Dip Levels (mbgl)
Dip Level (mAOD
Base of Borehole (mbgl)
AWS001 Natural 1.1 111.94 4.05 AWS002 Natural 1.3 114.58 3.75 AWS003 Natural 1.37 113.32 3.90 AWS004 Reworked/Made Ground 2.49 117.19 4.00 AWS005 Reworked/Made Ground 1.78 117.99 4.00 AWS006 Natural 1.43 118.23 4.00 AWS007 Natural 1.11 118.64 4.00 AWS008 Natural 0.75 118.87 3.50 AWS009 Natural 0.70 123.27 3.90 AWS010 Natural 0.90 124.42 3.25
The water levels recorded during the monitoring round were consistent with the water levels recorded during the monitoring of the existing boreholes during Atkins’ Site Reconnaissance. Monitored water levels were above the screened section of the monitoring well in several locations and it is possible that LNAPL in these locations was not identified, but there was no visual or olfactory evidence of contamination in purged groundwater.
Groundwater was between 0.7 (AWS009) and 2.49mbgl (AWS004) and 111.94mAOD in AWS001 in the southeast and 124,42mAOD in AWS010 in the northwest, indicating a possible flow towards the southeast.
4.3.5. Ground Gas Ground gas monitoring was undertaken on the 16th January 2013. The results are summarised in Table 4.3.
Table 4.3: Summary of Ground Gas Monitoring
Location Methane (%)
Carbon Dioxide
(%) Oxygen
(%) Hydrogen Sulphide
(ppm)
Carbon Monoxide
(ppm) Flow (l/hr)
Barometric Pressure (millibars)
Relative Pressure (millibars)
AWS001 <0.1 1.0 16.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1000 -0.2 AWS002 <0.1 0.8 21.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 1002 0.18 AWS003* <0.1 3.1 <0.01 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1003 58.13 AWS004 <0.1 2.0 16.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1003 -0.11 AWS005 9.8 8.2 <0.01 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1002 -0.79 AWS006 <0.1 3.5 17.9 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1003 0.07 AWS007 <0.1 0.9 20.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1003 -0.37 AWS008 <0.1 0.9 19.9 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 1003 0.17 AWS009 0.1 2.3 18.9 <0.1 <0.1 -0.9 1003 -3.65 AWS010 <0.1 0.4 19.9 <0.1 <0.1 -0.1 1003 0.17
Carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulphide were below the instruments detection limit. Carbon dioxide ranged from 0.4 (AWS010) to 8.2% (AWS005). Methane was only recorded above the
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
18
instrument detection limit in AWS005 (9.8%). Low levels of oxygen (<0.1%) was also detected in ASW005.
The data collected from ASW003 was regarded as spurious because “pistoning” was thought to be occurring in the borehole leading to low levels of oxygen, high flows and high relative pressure being recorded. These data have been discounted.
4.3.6. Chemical Analysis The results of laboratory analysis carried out on samples of soil and water are presented in full in Appendix E and discussed in Chapter 5.
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
19
5. Assessment of Risks 5.1. Introduction
Based on information obtained by this Phase 2 LQA, the preliminary CSM and PCLs have been investigated further. PCLs relating to human health, controlled waters and property have been subject to the generic quantitative risk assessment (GQRA) described in this Chapter. This has comprised comparison of detected concentrations in soil and water with a set of generic assessment criteria (GAC).
5.2. Tier 2 Generic Quantitative Risk Assessment A Tier 2 GQRA of identified receptors has been carried out using information from this Phase 2 Site Investigation.
5.2.1. Human Receptors
5.2.1.1. Selection of Generic Assessment Criteria Detailed guidance on human health risk assessment is available in Science Report (SR) 213, SR314, SR415 and the Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) Model16. Atkins GQRA for current and future human receptors has compared soil concentration data with GAC to identify whether a potential risk is posed by the contaminant concentrations detected. The GAC considered include:
• Soil Guideline Values: The Environment Agency has an ongoing programme of publication of Soil Guideline Values (SGVs). SGVs are trigger values for screening out low risk areas of land contamination. They give an indication of representative average concentrations of chemicals in soil below which the long-term health risks are likely to be minimal. SGVs have been published for arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel, selenium, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX), phenols and dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCB substances for residential, allotments and commercial land-uses. The SGVs have been developed for a sandy loam soil with 6% soil organic matter (SOM) content; and
• Atkins’ Soil Screening Values: Atkins has derived a set of Soil-Screening Values (SSVs) to supplement the SGVs following the CLEA Model. Atkins’-derived SSVs are available for the CLEA standard land-uses for a wider range of typical indicator contaminants. SSVs have also been derived for a sandy soil with 1% SOM and for parks, playing fields and open spaces; and
• Atkins’ Water Screening Values: Atkins has derived a set of Water Screening Values (WSV) using the RBCA Toolkit model. The values are based on groundwater at 1mbgl and a sand soil and are available for a commercial and a residential receptor.
SOM is defined as ‘the fraction of the soil composed of organic matter. It consists of plant and animal remains in varying stages of decomposition’. The presence of SOM is important in determining the fate and behaviour of a number of organic contaminants such as PAHs and chlorinated solvents. The mobility of these contaminants decreases with increasing SOM. Generally, the greater the SOM content the greater the sorptive capacity of the soil.
Based on soil results, the SOM for the Site has been calculated at 1.76% and the soil comprises clay, sand, gravel and cobbles. Therefore, Atkins’-derived SSVs for 1% SOM and a sandy soil have been used as GAC in the first instance, together with the SGVs which do not change with soil type and SOM.
13 Science Report SC050021/SR2, Human Health Toxicological Assessment of Contaminants in Soil, Environment Agency, 2009 14 Science Report SC050021/SR3, Updated Technical Background to the CLEA Model, Environment Agency, 2009 15 Science Report SC050021/SR4, CLEA Model Software (Version) Handbook, Environment Agency, 2009 16 CLEA Software Version 1.04, Environment Agency, 2009
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
20
The Site is on care and maintenance with only occasional visits by Costain. The commercial/industrial land-use assumes a female receptor on-site for an 8-hour day, one hour of which will be spent outside. Therefore, the commercial/industrial land-use GAC are likely to be protective of current receptors and future receptors assuming commercial/industrial land-use resumes.
There are no GAC for off-site human receptors and as such, these cannot be assessed, although the GAC for the on-site human receptors may be protective of the off-site human receptors.
Construction/maintenance workers involved with Site development may have direct contact with soils, although this cannot be formally assessed through this GQRA because the mode and duration of exposure are different to the scenarios used in determining GAC.
5.2.1.2. Comparison of Soil Concentration Data with Generic Assessment Criteria No asbestos containing material (ACM) was identified in the soil samples analysed.
Contaminants in the soil samples analysed were either below the laboratory method detection limits (MDL) or the commercial/industrial land-use GAC. A summary of the soil chemical analysis data is included in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Soil Data Summary
Contaminant GAC (mg/kg)
Minimum (mg/kg)
Maximum (mg/kg)
Location of Maximum
Naphthalene 8180 < 0.05 3.4 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Acenaphthylene - < 0.20 < 0.20 All below the MDL
Acenaphthene 109000 < 0.10 0.34 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Fluorene 66800 < 0.20 < 0.20 All below the MDL
Phenanthrene - < 0.20 1.9 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Anthracene 536000 < 0.10 0.35 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Fluoranthene 72300 < 0.20 4.6 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Pyrene 54200 < 0.20 4 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Benzo(a)anthracene 131 < 0.20 3.4 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Chrysene 14000 < 0.05 3.1 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 142 < 0.10 2.3 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1430 < 0.20 1.5 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Benzo(a)pyrene 14.3 < 0.10 2.1 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 142 < 0.20 0.72 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 14.3 < 0.20 < 0.20 All below the MDL
Benzo(ghi)perylene 1440 < 0.05 1 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Speciated Total EPA-16 PAHs - < 1.6 29 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Benzene 13.1 < 0.001 < 0.001 All below the MDL
Toluene 414000 < 0.001 < 0.001 All below the MDL
Ethylbenzene 180000 < 0.001 < 0.001 All below the MDL Xylenes (p) Xylenes (o) Xylenes (m)
279,000 296,000 276,000 <0.001 <0.001 All below the MDL
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether) 3340 < 0.001 < 0.001 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic >EC5 - EC6 1000000 < 0.1 < 0.1 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic >EC6 - EC8 1000000 < 0.1 < 0.1 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic >EC8 - EC10 167000 < 0.1 < 0.1 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic >EC10 - EC12 171000 < 1.0 < 1.0 All below the MDL
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
21
Contaminant GAC (mg/kg)
Minimum (mg/kg)
Maximum (mg/kg)
Location of Maximum
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic >EC12 - EC16 171000 < 2.0 < 2.0 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic >EC16 - EC21 ≤ 1 kg/kg < 8.0 < 8.0 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic >EC21 - EC35 1000000 < 8.0 37 AWS008 0.50mbgl
TPH-CWG - Aliphatic (EC5 - EC35) - < 10 37 AWS008 0.50mbgl
TPH-CWG - Aromatic >EC5 - EC7 13.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aromatic >EC7 - EC8 414000 < 0.1 < 0.1 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aromatic >EC8 - EC10 58600 < 0.1 0.1 AWS005 1.00mbgl
TPH-CWG - Aromatic >EC10 - EC12 68300 < 1.0 3.5 AWS004 0.30mbgl
TPH-CWG - Aromatic >EC12 - EC16 68400 < 2.0 < 2.0 All below the MDL
TPH-CWG - Aromatic >EC16 - EC21 28400 < 10 11 AWS004 0.30mbgl
TPH-CWG - Aromatic >EC21 - EC35 28400 < 10 20 AWS004 0.30mbgl
TPH-CWG - Aromatic (EC5 - EC35) - < 10 35 AWS004 0.30mbgl
Tetraethyl Lead - < 0.01 < 0.01 All below the MDL
Tetramethyl Lead - < 0.01 < 0.01 All below the MDL
Although slight hydrocarbon type odours were noted in AWS004 and AWS005 with a soil vapour reading of 64.4ppm from AWS005, the laboratory results do not indicate gross contamination and soil vapour headspace readings of other samples were low or below the instrument detection limit.
5.2.1.3. Comparison of Water Concentration Data with Generic Assessment Criteria Contaminants in the water samples analysed were reported below the laboratory MDL in all samples and thus did not exceed Atkins commercial (or residential) WSV.
Soil vapour headspace readings, potentially indicative of VOCs, were not recorded above the detection limit of the instrument during water sampling.
5.2.1.4. Ground Gas Ground gas results have been assessed using the Modified Wilson & Card17 Risk Classification Gas Screening Value (GSV) to derive a characteristic situation (CS). The Site CS for carbon dioxide and methane is CS1 which represents very low risk. However, CIRIA 665 recommends that consideration be given to increasing the CS if concentrations of methane are detected above 1% and carbon dioxide above 5%. This would raise the Site to CS2 (low risk) for methane and carbon dioxide, based on the reading of 9.8% methane and 8.2% carbon dioxide in AWS005.
A layer of black, ashy, gravels containing slag and clinker was observed in the area of the former rail sidings (AWS004-008) and hydrocarbon type odours noted within AWS004 and AWS005 may be the source of the ground gas detected.
This is based on one round of monitoring only and could change if further monitoring was to be carried out.
5.2.2. Controlled Waters Receptors Controlled waters GQRA has been carried out by:
• comparison of detected concentrations in groundwater with the UK/EU Drinking Water Quality Standards (DWS) to assess the potential risk posed to and existing quality of the groundwater receptor; and
17 Assessing Risks posed by Hazardous Ground Gases into Buildings, Wilson and Card, CIRIA 665, 2007
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
22
• comparison of detected concentrations in groundwater with Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for freshwater to assess the potential risk posed to the surface water receptors because migration in groundwater and discharge to surface water is a potential pathway.
5.2.2.1. Comparison of Groundwater Quality Data with Generic Assessment Criteria No LNAPL was detected. All contaminants were below the laboratory MDL and/or DWS/EQS in the groundwater samples analysed. This is based on one round of monitoring only and could change if further monitoring was to be carried out.
5.2.3. Property Receptors The Site CS is CS2 (low risk) for methane and carbon dioxide, based on the reading of 9.8% methane and 8.2% carbon dioxide in AWS005. This is based on one round of monitoring only and could change if further monitoring was to be carried out.
5.2.4. Asbestos in Buildings Atkins has not been provided with a copy of the Site asbestos register for review. It should be noted that for the purposes of this Phase 2 LQA, asbestos within Site structures and other contaminants in buildings is not considered to represent a land contamination issue and as such is beyond the scope of this report.
However, the potential for asbestos to be present in soil is considered to represent a land contamination issue and has been discussed earlier in this chapter.
5.3. Risk Assessment Summary
5.3.1. Summary A GQRA of the PCLs identified at the Site has been carried out based on collection of empirical data from the Site Investigation and information gained during the Phase 1 and Phase 2 LQA process.
No ACM was identified in the soil samples analysed. Contaminants in the soil samples analysed were either below the laboratory MDL or the commercial/industrial land-use GAC.
Contaminants in the water samples analysed did not exceed the laboratory MDL or Atkins commercial (or residential) WSV.
No LNAPL was detected and no contaminants were identified above the laboratory MDL and/or DWS/EQS in the groundwater samples analysed.
The Site CS for carbon dioxide and methane was CS2 based on the elevated readings of 9.8% methane and 8.2% carbon dioxide in AWS005.
5.3.2. Risk Assessment An environmental risk assessment has been carried out as described in Chapter 2 and presented in Appendix C. The Phase 2 environmental risk assessment for the Site is summarised in Table 5.2 and the updated CSM is presented in Figure 5 (Drawing 5106238-DWG-025).
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
23
Table 5.2: Land Quality Assessment Environmental Risk Assessment Summary Table
Source Potential Contaminant
Potential Receptor
Potential Pathway
Associated Hazard
Potential Consequence
Likelihood (Probability) Of
Contaminant Receptor Linkage Potential
Significance
Contaminants in soil/shallow groundwater across the Site
Range of organic/inorganic contaminants
Current/Future Construction/maintenance Workers
Dermal Contact Inhalation Ingestion
Health risk Medium
Likely On-site construction/maintenance workers may be in direct contact with contaminants because they may be required to excavate and handle soil. Unlikely Robust risk assessment is required to identify appropriate personnel protective equipment and suitable working methods to protect these receptors, in accordance with current guidance and recommended good working practices.
Moderate Risk
reduced to Low Risk
Historic On-site Activities/Operations 1. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from USTs and associated pipework. 2. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the ASTs, valves, manifolds, pumps and associated pipework. 3. Former rail and road loading areas (including potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the areas and associated pipework). 4. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons and foam from the drum storage areas. 5. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the interceptor/drains. 6. Potential historical leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from the former generator, substation and workshop. 7. Presence of contamination in the tetraethyl lead sludge pits.
Hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater
Humans On-site: Current/Future Facility Management Workers Future Site Workers/Visitors (if Site is reopened)
Dermal Contact Inhalation Ingestion
Health risk Mild
Low Only discrete olfactory evidence of contamination at the Site. No evidence of spill stains or odours at surface. No ACM was identified in the soil samples analysed. Contaminants in the soil samples analysed were either below the laboratory MDL or the commercial/industrial land-use GAC. Contaminants in the water samples analysed did not exceed Atkins commercial (or residential) WSV.
Low Risk
Humans Off-site Current/Future occupants of Stable Farm and farm workers
Dermal Contact Inhalation Ingestion
Health risk Mild
Low Only discrete olfactory evidence of contamination noted. No evidence of spill stains or odours at surface. No ACM was identified in the soil samples analysed. Contaminants in the soil samples analysed were either below the laboratory MDL or the commercial/industrial land-use GAC. Contaminants in the water samples analysed did not exceed Atkins commercial (or residential) WSV. In addition, Site surfaces are hardstanding or well vegetated, minimising windblown soil-derived dust. Surface water run-off will be intercepted by Site drains or soak into the ground.
Low Risk
Groundwater Leaching from soil Migration of LNAPL Migration of contaminants in groundwater
Pollution of Aquifer Mild
Low No LNAPL or visual/olfactory indications of contamination were detected. No contaminants were identified above the laboratory MDL in the groundwater samples analysed. However, this is based on one round of monitoring.
Low Risk
Surface Water River Ise
Discharge of LNAPL Discharge of contaminants in base flow
Pollution of sensitive watercourse Mild
Low No LNAPL or visual/olfactory indications of contamination were detected. No contaminants were identified above the laboratory MDL in the groundwater samples analysed. However, this is based on one round of monitoring.
Low Risk
Property On-site (buildings/infrastructure)
Direct contact with hydrocarbons in soil/water Damage to materials Minor
Unlikely Although TPH was detected in the soil, hydrocarbons only tend to be an issue if concrete is being poured which is not the case at the Site. No LNAPL was detected. No contaminants were identified above the laboratory MDL in the groundwater samples analysed.
Negligible Risk
Property Off-site (buildings/infrastructure)
Direct contact with hydrocarbons in migrating groundwater Damage to materials Minor
Unlikely No LNAPL was detected. No contaminants were identified above the laboratory MDL in the groundwater samples analysed. Off-site property (buildings/infrastructure) receptors are most likely not down hydraulic gradient from the Site.
Negligible Risk
Ground Gas
Methane/Carbon Dioxide
Humans On-site: Current/Future Site Workers/Visitors Inhalation Health Risk Mild
Low The Site CS for methane and carbon dioxide are CS2 (low risk) because of readings from AWS005. However, this is based on one round of monitoring
Low Risk
Humans Off-site Current/Future occupants of/visitors to the house to the north-west, public using footpath to the north-east and workers to the south-east
Inhalation Health Risk Mild
Low The Site CS for methane and carbon dioxide are CS2 (low risk) because of readings from AWS005. However, this is based on one round of monitoring
Low Risk
Methane
Property On-site (buildings/infrastructure)
Accumulation (methane only) Damage to buildings Mild
Low The Site CS for methane is CS2 (low risk) because of readings from AWS005. However, this is based on one round of monitoring
Low Risk
Property Off-site (buildings/infrastructure)
Accumulation (methane only) Damage to buildings Mild
Low The Site CS for methane is CS2 (low risk) because of readings from AWS005. However, this is based on one round of monitoring
Low Risk
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
24
6. Conclusions 6.1. Overall Land Quality
The Site was fields until development as a PSD in the 1940s. Operations included storage of aviation fuel in seven USTs, together with associated manifolds, valve compounds, loading gantries and workshops/support. An active pipeline still runs through the Site from the southeast.
Atkins Phase 1 LQA identified a number of historic, on-site potentially contaminative activities from past operations including potential leaks/spills of hydrocarbons from tanks, pipework, loading areas, drums storage, workshops, generators, substations, interceptors and in Made Ground itself, although there was no documentary information or physical evidence to confirm that contamination was present from these potential sources. In addition, it was practice in the past to bury sediment from tank cleaning in pits, often called ‘graves’ and four are reportedly present on the Site.
The Phase 2 Site Investigation carried out targeted these potential sources and has indicated that the Site is underlain by Superficial Deposits (sand), possibly in the northeast and weathered bedrock. Areas of Made Ground are present across the Site, especially associated with the former railway sidings in the centre to depths of 0.7 and 1.9mbgl.
Groundwater has been detected in the natural strata between 0.7 and 2.49mbgl with a slight gradient down to the southeast.
No ACM was identified in the soil samples analysed. Contaminants in the soil samples analysed were either below the laboratory MDL or the commercial/industrial land-use GAC. Contaminants in the water samples analysed did not exceed the laboratory MDL or Atkins commercial (or residential) WSV.
In addition, no LNAPL was detected and no contaminants were identified above the laboratory MDL and/or DWS/EQS in the groundwater samples analysed.
The Site CS for carbon dioxide and methane was CS2 based on the elevated readings of 9.8% methane and 8.2% carbon dioxide in AWS005.
6.2. Environmental Risks The environmental risk assessment is summarised below:
• a moderate risk has been identified to current/future construction/maintenance workers from contaminants in soil and groundwater even if they do not exceed the GAC because they may be in direct contact with contaminants when they are required to excavate and handle soil. However, this will be reduce to low risk if robust risk assessments are carried out to identify appropriate personnel protective equipment and suitable working methods to protect these receptors, in accordance with current guidance and recommended good working practices;
• a low risk has been identified to current/future on-site human receptors from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater;
• a low risk has been identified to current/future off-site human receptors from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater;
• a low risk has been identified to groundwater from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater;
• a low risk has been identified to surface water from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater;
• a low risk has been identified to current/future on-site human receptors from the methane/carbon dioxide detected;
Land Quality Assessment: Combined Phase 1 and 2: Final GPSS Portfolio: Kelmarsh Petroleum Storage Depot
25
• a low risk has been identified to current/future off-site human receptors from the methane/carbon dioxide detected;
• a negligible risk has been identified to on-site property from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater and a low risk from the methane detected; and
• a negligible risk has been identified to off-site property from the contamination detected in the soil/groundwater and a low risk from the methane detected.
It should be noted that the assessment of ground gas and groundwater risks has been based on one round of monitoring only and the ground gas CS could change if further monitoring was to be carried out. Identified risks to groundwater could increase or decrease based on further monitoring.
6.3. Suitability of Investigated Areas for Continued Use Based on the Combined Phase 1/2 LQA carried out, the Site is considered suitable for use as a PSD (i.e. commercial/industrial), although it should be noted that assessment of ground gas and groundwater associated risks are based on only one round of monitoring.
The investigation was carried out to assess land quality and the condition of the buildings or contamination within the buildings was not part of that assessment. The potential for release of contamination during building demolition including the removal of tanks has not been considered and appropriate management is required if the buildings/infrastructure are demolished.
In addition, given the inherent limitations of any ground investigation, localised hotspots of contamination may exist between boreholes.
FIGURES
A324.07.2013
KELMARSH PETROLEUM STORAGE DEPOT
DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION
5106238-DWG-021
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION PLAN
1 25000 NORTH F
CENTRE MN/A
04/02/13 --/02/13 -
5106238-DWG-021 -
Report Issue- Centre M 08/13
Site
5106238-DWG-022
FIGURE 2 - SITE LAYOUT PLAN & POTENTIAL
SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION
1 1500 NORTH F
CENTRE MN/A
18/01/13 18/01/13 -
5106238-DWG-022 -
A3 12/08/13
KELMARSH PETROLEUM STORAGE DEPOT
DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION
Report Issue
- Centre M 08/13
5106238-DWG-023
FIGURE 3: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL SITE
MODEL FOR SITE INVESTIGATION
1 1500 NORTH F
CENTRE MN/A
18/01/13 18/01/13 -
5106238-DWG-023 -
A312/08/13
KELMARSH PETROLEUM STORAGE DEPOT
DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION
For Information - Centre M 08/13
5106238-DWG-024
FIGURE 4 - EXPLORATORY HOLE LOCATION PLAN
1 1500 NORTH F
CENTRE MN/A
18/01/13 18/01/13 -
5106238-DWG-024 -
A312/08/13
KELMARSH PETROLEUM STORAGE DEPOT
DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION
Key:
Borehole locations
Window sample locations
For Information - Centre M
5106238-DWG-025
FIGURE 5 - REVISED CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
Not to Scale NORTH F
CENTRE MN/A
18/01/13 18/01/13 -
5106238-DWG-025 -
A312/08/13
KELMARSH PETROLEUM STORAGE DEPOT
DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION
For Information - Centre M 08/13
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Datasheet
Order Details:Order Number:
Customer Reference:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
Site Details:
Client Details:
Prepared For:
41006971_1_1
5106238
474510, 280690
A
6.57
1000
KelmarshNN6 9NB
Mr I McBurnieAtkins LtdThe Axis10 Holliday StreetBirminghanB1 1TF
Defence Infrastructure OrganisationKingston RoadSutton ColdfieldWest MidlandsB75 7RL
Report:®Envirocheck
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Agency & Hydrological
Waste
Hazardous Substances
Geological
Industrial Land Use
Sensitive Land Use
Data Currency
Data Suppliers
Useful Contacts
Introduction
Copyright Notice
Natural England Copyright Notice
Ove Arup Copyright Notice
Peter Brett Associates Copyright Notice
Radon Potential dataset Copyright Notice
The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination. For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client.
In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements with a number of Data Suppliers.
© Landmark Information Group Limited 2012. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck® Report ("Report") is the property of Landmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency and Natural England, and must not be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions accepted by the Customer. A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the Index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.
Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar, Special Protection Area, Special Conservation Area, Marine Nature Reserve data (derived from Ordnance Survey 1:10000 raster) is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data.
The Data provided in this report was obtained on Licence from Ove Arup & Partners Limited (for further information, contact [email protected]). No reproduction or further use of such Data is to be made without the prior written consent of Ove Arup & Partners Limited. The information and data supplied in the product are derived from publicly available records and other third party sources and neither Ove Arup & Partners nor Landmark warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or data.
The cavity data presented has been extracted from the PBA enhanced version of the original DEFRA national cavity databases. PBA/DEFRA retain the copyright & intellectual property rights in the data. Whilst all reasonable efforts are made to check that the information contained in the cavity databases is accurate we do not warrant that the data is complete or error free. The information is based upon our own researches and those collated from a number of external sources and is continually being augmented and updated by PBA. In no event shall PBA/DEFRA or Landmark be liable for any loss or damage including, without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from the use of this data.
Information supplied from a joint dataset compiled by The British Geological Survey and the Health Protection Agency.
Report Section Page Number
Contents
Report Version v47.0
-
1
3
4
5
15
16
17
22
23
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Data Type PageNumber On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
Agency & Hydrological
Waste
501 to 1000m
Contaminated Land Register Entries and Notices
Discharge Consents
Enforcement and Prohibition Notices
Integrated Pollution Controls
Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements
Nearest Surface Water Feature
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes
Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters
Registered Radioactive Substances
River Quality
River Quality Biology Sampling Points
River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points
Substantiated Pollution Incident Register
Water Abstractions
Water Industry Act Referrals
Groundwater Vulnerability
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Source Protection Zones
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences
Flood Water Storage Areas
Flood Defences
BGS Recorded Landfill Sites
Historical Landfill Sites
Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites
Registered Landfill Sites
Registered Waste Transfer Sites
Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
n/a
n/a
Yes
Yes
1
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2
1
1
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
(*up to 2000m)
pg 1
pg 1
pg 1
pg 2
pg 2
pg 2
pg 2
pg 2
pg 2
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Data Type PageNumber On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
Hazardous Substances
Geological
Industrial Land Use
501 to 1000m
Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)
Explosive Sites
Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)
Planning Hazardous Substance Consents
Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Recorded Mineral Sites
BGS Urban Soil Chemistry
BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages
Brine Compensation Area
Coal Mining Affected Areas
Mining Instability
Man-Made Mining Cavities
Natural Cavities
Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas
Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Fuel Station Entries
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
Yes
1
n/a
n/a
n/a
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
n/a
n/a
Yes
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Yes
1
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2
(*up to 2000m)
pg 4
pg 5
pg 5
pg 12
pg 13
pg 13
pg 13
pg 13
pg 14
pg 14
pg 14
pg 15
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Data Type PageNumber On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
Sensitive Land Use
501 to 1000m
Areas of Adopted Green Belt
Areas of Unadopted Green Belt
Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Forest Parks
Local Nature Reserves
Marine Nature Reserves
National Nature Reserves
National Parks
Nitrate Sensitive Areas
Nitrate Vulnerable Zones
Ramsar Sites
Sites of Special Scientific Interest
Special Areas of Conservation
Special Protection Areas
1
(*up to 2000m)
pg 16
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 1 of 23
Agency & Hydrological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
1
2
2
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Discharge Consents
Nearest Surface Water Feature
River Quality
A18SE(NE)
A19SE(NE)
A19SE(NE)
A13SW(SW)
A19SW(NE)
379
768
768
100
740
1
1
1
-
1
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:Discharge Environment:Receiving Water:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:Discharge Environment:Receiving Water:Status:
Positional Accuracy:
Operator:Property Type:Location:Authority:Catchment Area:Reference:Permit Version:Effective Date:Issued Date:Revocation Date:Discharge Type:Discharge Environment:Receiving Water:Status:
Positional Accuracy:
Name:GQA Grade:Reach:Estimated Distance (km):Flow Rate:Flow Type:Year:
Horatio Herbert & Maurice Edward HandyNot SuppliedArthingworth Lodge, Arthingworth, Market Harborough, Le16 8juEnvironment Agency, Anglian RegionNot SuppliedPr5nf219011st July 19631st July 196316th May 1991UnknownNot Supplied
Not SuppliedPre National Rivers Authority Legislation where issue date < 01/09/1989Located by supplier to within 100m
Anglian Water Services LimitedSewerage Network - Pumping Station - Water CompanyArthingworth Pumping Station, Arthingworth, NorthamptonshireEnvironment Agency, Anglian RegionRiver Ise (Kettering)Awnnf13783125th August 20052nd September 2005Not SuppliedSewage Discharges - Stw Storm Overflow/Storm Tank - Water CompanyFreshwater Stream/River
River IseNew Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as amended by Environment Act 1995)Located by supplier to within 10m
Anglian Water Services LimitedSewerage Network - Pumping Station - Water CompanyArthingworth Pumping Station, Arthingworth, NorthamptonshireEnvironment Agency, Anglian RegionRiver Ise (Kettering)Awnnf13783125th August 20052nd September 2005Not SuppliedSewage Discharges - Pumping Station - Water CompanyFreshwater Stream/River
River IseNew Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as amended by Environment Act 1995)Located by supplier to within 10m
IseRiver Quality BDesborough...Rushton4.5
Flow less than 0.31 cumecsRiver2000
474800281100
475270281150
475270281150
474395280555
475119281295
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 2 of 23
Agency & Hydrological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
3Water Abstractions
Groundwater Vulnerability
Groundwater Vulnerability
Drift Deposits
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences
Flood Water Storage Areas
Flood Defences
A9SE(SE)
A13NW(N)
A13SE(SW)
A13SE(SW)
A13NE(N)
A13NW(NW)
A18SW(NW)
956
0
0
0
0
192
194
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
Operator:Licence Number:Permit Version:Location:Authority:Abstraction:Abstraction Type:Source:Daily Rate (m3):Yearly Rate (m3):Details:Authorised Start:Authorised End:Permit Start Date:Permit End Date:Positional Accuracy:
Soil Classification:
Map Sheet:Scale:
Soil Classification:Map Sheet:Scale:
Aquifer Desination:
Aquifer Designation:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
Type:Flood Plain Type:Boundary Accuracy:
C G Lancaster5/32/06/*g/045 Not SuppliedWell, ARTHINGWORTHEnvironment Agency, Anglian RegionAgriculture (General)Not SuppliedWell522730Miscellaneous Jurassic; Status: RevokedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedNot SuppliedLocated by supplier to within 10m
Soils of Low Leaching Potential - Soils in which pollutants are unlikely to penetrate the soil layer because water movement is largely horizontal or they have large ability to attenuate diffuse pollutants. Lateral flow from these soils contribute to groundwater recharge elsewhere in the catchmentSheet 23 Leicestershire1:100,000
Not classifiedSheet 23 Leicestershire1:100,000
Unproductive Strata
Secondary Aquifer - A
Extent of Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
Extent of Flooding from Rivers or Sea without DefencesFluvial ModelsAs Supplied
None
None
None
None
475300279800
474480280772
474510280685
474510280685
474512280730
474240280960
474340281035
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 3 of 23
Waste
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
Local Authority Landfill Coverage
Local Authority Landfill Coverage
0
0
6
7
Name:
Name:
Northamptonshire County Council - Has supplied landfill data
Daventry District Council - Landfill data has been supplied by another authority
474510280685
474510280685
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 4 of 23
Hazardous Substances
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
4Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)
A13SE(S)
0 3Name:Location:
Reference:Type:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Oil And Pipelines AgencyKelmarsh Psd, Church Farm Way, Market Harborough, Leicestershire, LE16 8LANot SuppliedLower TierActiveManually positioned to the address or location
474526280623
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 5 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A13SE(SW)
A13NE(N)
A13SE(SW)
A13NE(N)
A13NE(N)
A13NW(NW)
A18SW(N)
0
0
0
104
153
192
203
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
Description:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Upper Lias
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
474510280685
474512280729
474510280685
474510281000
474587281000
474181280894
474364281067
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 6 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A12NE(NW)
A13NW(NW)
A12SE(W)
A12NE(W)
A12NE(W)
A12NE(W)
252
279
309
311
317
319
4
4
4
4
4
4
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
474108280904
474163281000
474000280685
474010280834
474000280819
474000280828
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 7 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A12SE(W)
A14SW(E)
A12NE(NW)
A14NW(E)
A12NE(NW)
A12NE(NW)
322
336
398
418
431
439
4
4
4
4
4
4
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
474000280661
475000280685
474000281000
475019280889
473938280969
473948281000
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 8 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A8NE(S)
A18SW(NW)
A19SW(NE)
A14NW(NE)
A8SE(S)
A8SE(S)
448
458
459
462
476
486
4
4
4
4
4
4
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil60 - 120 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
120 - 180 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg60 - 80 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
60 - 90 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil60 - 120 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
120 - 180 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg60 - 80 mg/kg
474511280043
474243281291
474919281087
475000281000
474529280000
474510280000
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 9 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A19SW(NE)
A18NE(N)
A14NW(NE)
A19SW(NE)
A9SW(SE)
A17SE(NW)
495
496
514
574
607
613
4
4
4
4
4
4
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
475000281051
474537281388
475065281000
475077281082
475000280000
474000281294
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 10 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A14NE(NE)
A14NE(NE)
A8SW(S)
A7SE(SW)
A7SE(SW)
A19SE(NE)
656
661
775
780
799
812
4
4
4
4
4
4
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil60 - 120 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
120 - 180 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg60 - 80 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
475225281008
475235281000
474472279716
474000280000
473968280000
475245281252
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 11 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
A19NW(NE)
A3NE(S)
A23SW(N)
A19NW(N)
A3NE(S)
A24SW(NE)
862
864
886
894
906
937
4
4
4
4
4
4
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil60 - 120 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
120 - 180 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg60 - 80 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
475000281580
474647279613
474228281747
474917281673
474798279587
474954281701
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 12 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
5
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Recorded Mineral Sites
A11SE(W)
A19NW(NE)
A22SE(NW)
A19NE(NE)
A4NW(SE)
A13SW(SW)
952
955
974
977
993
96
4
4
4
4
4
2
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Source:Soil Sample Type:Arsenic Concentration:Cadmium Concentration:Chromium Concentration:Lead Concentration:Nickel Concentration:
Site Name:Location:Source:Reference:Type:Status:Operator:Operator Location:Periodic Type:Geology:Commodity:Positional Accuracy:
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg15 - 30 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil15 - 25 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil25 - 35 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
90 - 120 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg30 - 45 mg/kg
British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information ServiceRural Soil60 - 120 mg/kg
<1.8 mg/kg
120 - 180 mg/kg
<150 mg/kg60 - 80 mg/kg
Langborough Wood Brick Field, Kelmarsh, Northampton, NorthamptonshireBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service139405OpencastCeasedUnknown OperatorUnknown OperatorJurassicWhitby Mudstone FormationCommon Clay and ShaleLocated by supplier to within 10m
473406280450
475080281641
474000281747
475320281416
475071279590
474365280580
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 13 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
6BGS Recorded Mineral Sites
BGS Measured Urban Soil Chemistry
BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages
Coal Mining Affected Areas
Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
A19SE(E)
A13SE(SW)
A13NW(NW)
A13SE(SW)
A13NW(NW)
A13SE(S)
A13NW(NW)
A13SE(SW)
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(SW)
A13SW(W)
A13SW(W)
A13SE(SW)
A13NE(N)
834
0
193
0
193
0
0
0
6
43
72
121
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name:Location:Source:Reference:Type:Status:Operator:Operator Location:Periodic Type:Geology:Commodity:Positional Accuracy:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Arthingworth Gravel Pit, Arthingworth, Market Harborough, NorthamptonshireBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service139407OpencastCeasedUnknown OperatorUnknown OperatorQuaternaryGlaciofluvial Deposits, Mid PleistoceneSand and GravelLocated by supplier to within 10m
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
ModerateBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
ModerateBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Very LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No data available
No data available
In an area that might not be affected by coal mining
No Hazard
No Hazard
475412281028
474510280685
474181280895
474510280685
474181280895
474510280661
474400280780
474510280685
474421280628
474390280627
474322280640
474277280613
474510280685
474512280730
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 14 of 23
Geological
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures
Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures
Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas
Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas
A13NW(NW)
A13NE(N)
A13SE(SW)
A13NE(NE)
A13SE(SW)
A13SE(S)
A13SE(SW)
A13SE(S)
193
0
0
207
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Hazard Potential:Source:
Protection Measure:
Source:
Protection Measure:
Source:
Affected Area:
Source:
Affected Area:
Source:
LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
LowBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No HazardBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
Basic radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensionsBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
No radon protective measures are necessary in the construction of new dwellings or extensionsBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
The property is in a radon affected area, as between 5 and 10% of homes are above the action levelBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
The property is in a lower probability radon area, as less than 1% of homes are above the action levelBritish Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
474181280895
474505280781
474510280685
474678280980
474510280685
474510280651
474510280685
474510280651
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 15 of 23
Industrial Land Use
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
7
8
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
A19SE(NE)
A19NE(NE)
920
952
-
-
Name:Location:
Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Name:Location:
Classification:Status:Positional Accuracy:
Brampton Valley Cycle Surgery4, Kelmarsh Road, Arthingworth, Market Harborough, Leicestershire, LE16 8JZMotor Cycle RepairsActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
Jet Pumps (Uk) Ltd4, Church Farm Way, Arthingworth, Market Harborough, Leicestershire, LE16 8NPMaterials Handling EquipmentActiveAutomatically positioned to the address
475385281252
475316281384
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 16 of 23
Sensitive Land Use
MapID Details
QuadrantReference (Compass Direction)
EstimatedDistanceFrom Site
Contact NGR
9Nitrate Vulnerable Zones
A13SE(SW)
0 5Name:Description:Source:
Not SuppliedNVZ AreaDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)
474510280685
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 17 of 23
Data Currency
Agency & Hydrological Version Update CycleContaminated Land Register Entries and Notices
Discharge Consents
Enforcement and Prohibition Notices
Integrated Pollution Controls
Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Integrated Pollution Prevention And Control
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control Enforcements
Nearest Surface Water Feature
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
Prosecutions Relating to Authorised Processes
Prosecutions Relating to Controlled Waters
Registered Radioactive Substances
River Quality
River Quality Biology Sampling Points
River Quality Chemistry Sampling Points
Substantiated Pollution Incident Register
August 2012November 2011September 2011
April 2012April 2012
June 2012June 2012
October 2008October 2008
April 2012April 2012
April 2012June 2011
November 2011
April 2012June 2011
November 2011
April 2012August 2012
November 2011
December 2011
December 1999September 1999
June 2012June 2012
June 2012June 2012
April 2012April 2012
November 2001
January 2011
January 2011
April 2012April 2012April 2012
Annual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling Update
QuarterlyQuarterly
QuarterlyQuarterly
Not ApplicableNot Applicable
QuarterlyQuarterly
Annual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling Update
Quarterly
Not ApplicableNot Applicable
MonthlyMonthly
MonthlyMonthly
QuarterlyQuarterly
Not Applicable
Annually
Annually
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
Daventry District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentHarborough District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentKettering Borough Council - Environmental Health Department
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Kettering Borough Council - Environmental Health DepartmentHarborough District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentDaventry District Council - Environmental Health Department
Kettering Borough Council - Environmental Health DepartmentHarborough District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentDaventry District Council - Environmental Health Department
Kettering Borough Council - Environmental Health DepartmentHarborough District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentDaventry District Council - Environmental Health Department
Ordnance Survey
Environment Agency - Midlands RegionEnvironment Agency - Anglian Region
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Northern AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - East AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - Lower Trent Area
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 18 of 23
Data Currency
Agency & Hydrological Version Update CycleWater Abstractions
Water Industry Act Referrals
Groundwater Vulnerability
Drift Deposits
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Source Protection Zones
Extreme Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Flooding from Rivers or Sea without Defences
Areas Benefiting from Flood Defences
Flood Water Storage Areas
Flood Defences
July 2012July 2012
April 2012April 2012
January 2011
January 1999
September 2011
September 2011
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
July 2012
QuarterlyQuarterly
QuarterlyQuarterly
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Annually
Annually
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Environment Agency - Head Office
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 19 of 23
Data Currency
Waste Version Update CycleBGS Recorded Landfill Sites
Historical Landfill Sites
Integrated Pollution Control Registered Waste Sites
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Landfill Boundaries)
Licensed Waste Management Facilities (Locations)
Local Authority Landfill Coverage
Local Authority Recorded Landfill Sites
Registered Landfill Sites
Registered Waste Transfer Sites
Registered Waste Treatment or Disposal Sites
June 1996
July 2012July 2012July 2012
October 2008October 2008
July 2012July 2012July 2012
April 2012April 2012April 2012
May 2000May 2000May 2000May 2000May 2000
May 2000May 2000May 2000May 2000May 2000
March 2003March 2003
March 2003March 2003
March 2003March 2003
Not Applicable
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
Not ApplicableNot Applicable
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
Not ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot Applicable
Not ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot ApplicableNot Applicable
Not ApplicableNot Applicable
Not ApplicableNot Applicable
Not ApplicableNot Applicable
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Northern AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - East AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - Lower Trent Area
Environment Agency - Anglian RegionEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region
Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Northern AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - East AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - Lower Trent Area
Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Northern AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - East AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - Lower Trent Area
Daventry District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentHarborough District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentKettering Borough Council - Environmental Health DepartmentLeicestershire County CouncilNorthamptonshire County Council
Daventry District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentHarborough District Council - Environmental Health DepartmentKettering Borough Council - Environmental Health DepartmentLeicestershire County CouncilNorthamptonshire County Council
Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Northern AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - Lower Trent Area
Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Northern AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - Lower Trent Area
Environment Agency - Anglian Region - Northern AreaEnvironment Agency - Midlands Region - Lower Trent Area
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 20 of 23
Data Currency
Hazardous Substances
Geological
Version
Version
Update Cycle
Update Cycle
Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)
Explosive Sites
Notification of Installations Handling Hazardous Substances (NIHHS)
Planning Hazardous Substance Enforcements
Planning Hazardous Substance Consents
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology
BGS Estimated Soil Chemistry
BGS Recorded Mineral Sites
Brine Compensation Area
Coal Mining Affected Areas
Mining Instability
Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain
Potential for Collapsible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Compressible Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Ground Dissolution Stability Hazards
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards
Radon Potential - Radon Affected Areas
Radon Potential - Radon Protection Measures
May 2012
June 2012
November 2000
August 2012August 2012January 2012January 2012
November 2011
August 2012August 2012January 2012January 2012
November 2011
August 1996
January 2010
April 2012
August 2011
January 2012
October 2000
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
February 2011
July 2011
July 2011
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Not Applicable
Annual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling Update
Annual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling UpdateAnnual Rolling Update
Not Applicable
Variable
Bi-Annually
Not Applicable
As notified
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
Annually
As notified
As notified
Health and Safety Executive
Health and Safety Executive
Health and Safety Executive
Kettering Borough CouncilLeicestershire County CouncilDaventry District CouncilHarborough District CouncilNorthamptonshire County Council
Kettering Borough CouncilLeicestershire County CouncilDaventry District CouncilHarborough District CouncilNorthamptonshire County Council
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Cheshire Brine Subsidence Compensation Board
The Coal Authority - Mining Report Service
Ove Arup & Partners
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
British Geological Survey - National Geoscience Information Service
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 21 of 23
Data Currency
Industrial Land Use
Sensitive Land Use
Version
Version
Update Cycle
Update Cycle
Contemporary Trade Directory Entries
Fuel Station Entries
Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Forest Parks
Local Nature Reserves
Marine Nature Reserves
National Nature Reserves
National Parks
Nitrate Sensitive Areas
Nitrate Vulnerable Zones
Ramsar Sites
Sites of Special Scientific Interest
Special Areas of Conservation
Special Protection Areas
May 2012
May 2012
July 2012
February 2012
April 1997
February 2012
August 2012
February 2012
August 2012
February 2012
February 2012
August 2012
February 2012
August 2012
August 2012
Quarterly
Quarterly
Bi-Annually
Annually
Not Applicable
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Not Applicable
Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Bi-Annually
Thomson Directories
Catalist Ltd - Experian
Natural England
Natural England
Forestry Commission
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Natural England
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 22 of 23
Data Suppliers
Ordnance Survey
Environment Agency
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
The Coal Authority
British Geological Survey
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Countryside Council for Wales
Scottish Natural Heritage
Natural England
Health Protection Agency
Ove Arup
Peter Brett Associates
Data Supplier Data Supplier Logo
A selection of organisations who provide data within this report
Order Number: 41006971_1_1 Date: 24-Aug-2012 rpr_ec_datasheet v47.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 23 of 23
Useful Contacts
Contact Name and Address Contact Details
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-
-
Environment Agency - National Customer Contact Centre (NCCC)
British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service
Health and Safety Executive
Landmark Information Group Limited
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA - formerly FRCA)
Northamptonshire County Council
Daventry District Council - Environmental Health Department
Health Protection Agency - Radon Survey, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards
Landmark Information Group Limited
PO Box 544, Templeborough, Rotherham, S60 1BY
British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG
Explosives Inspectorate, 1.2 Redgrave Court, Merton Road, Bootle, L20 7HS
5 - 7 Abbey Court, Eagle Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon, EX2 7HY
Government Buildings, Otley Road, Lawnswood, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS16 5QT
County Hall, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN1 1DN
Lodge Road, Daventry, Northamptonshire, NN11 5AF
Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ
The Smith Centre, Henley On Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 6AB
Telephone: 08708 506 506Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 0115 936 3143Fax: 0115 936 3276Email: [email protected]: www.bgs.ac.uk
Telephone: 0151 951 3092Fax: 0151 951 3891Email: [email protected]: www.hse.gov.uk
Telephone: 01392 441761Fax: 01392 441709Email: [email protected]: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk
Telephone: 0113 2613333Fax: 0113 230 0879
Telephone: 01604 236236Website: www.northamptonshire.gov.uk
Telephone: 01327 871100Fax: 01327 302540Website: www.daventrydc.gov.uk
Telephone: 01235 822622Fax: 01235 833891Email: [email protected]: www.hpa.org.uk
Telephone: 0844 844 9952Fax: 0844 844 9951Email: [email protected]: www.landmarkinfo.co.uk
Please note that the Environment Agency / SEPA have a charging policy in place for enquiries.
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 3A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 24-Aug-2012
Site Sensitivity Map - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 3A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 24-Aug-2012
Flood Map - Slice A
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 3A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 24-Aug-2012
Borehole Map - Slice A
For Borehole information please refer to the Borehole .csv file which accompanied this slice.
A copy of the BGS Borehole Ordering Form is available to download from the Support section of www.envirocheck.co.uk.
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 24-Aug-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Groundwater Vulnerability
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 24-Aug-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Bedrock Aquifer Designation
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 24-Aug-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Superficial Aquifer Designation
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 4 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 24-Aug-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Source Protection Zones
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 5 of 5A Landmark Information Group Service v15.0 24-Aug-2012
Site Sensitivity Context Map - Slice A
Sensitive Land Uses
APPENDIX B
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 24-Aug-2012
Historical Map - Slice A
Ordnance Survey County Series 1:10,560 Ordnance Survey Plan 1:10,000 1:10,000 Raster Mapping
Historical Mapping Legends
Historical Mapping & Photography included:
NorthamptonshireNorthamptonshireNorthamptonshireNorthamptonshireNorthamptonshireNorthamptonshireOrdnance Survey PlanOrdnance Survey PlanOrdnance Survey PlanOrdnance Survey Plan10K Raster Mapping10K Raster Mapping
1:10,5601:10,5601:10,5601:10,5601:10,5601:10,5601:10,0001:10,0001:10,0001:10,0001:10,0001:10,000
188519011901192719271952195819691970 - 1971198820062012
23456789
10111213
Mapping Type Scale Date Pg
Order Details
Site DetailsKelmarsh, NN6 9NB
Order Number:Customer Ref:National Grid Reference:Slice:Site Area (Ha):Search Buffer (m):
41006971_1_15106238474510, 280690A6.571000
Tel:Fax:Web:
0844 844 99520844 844 9951www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 13A Landmark Information Group Service v47.0 24-Aug-2012
NorthamptonshirePublished 1885Source map scale - 1:10,560The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854 the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first 1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. Therevision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every 10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)