IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDSDIVISION OF ST. CROIX

MOHAMMAD HAMED, by his ) CIVIL NO. SX-12-CV-370authorized agent WALEED HAMED, )

) ACTION FOR DAMAGES,Plaintiff/counterclaim Defendant, ) INJLTNCTIVE RELIEF

) AND DECLARATORY RELIEFVS. )

)FATHI YUSUF and UNITED CORPORATION,)

)Defendants/Counterclaimants, )

)vs. ))

WALEED HAMED, \ryAI{EED HAMED, )MUFEED HAMED,IIISHAM HAMED, and )PLESSEN ENTERPRISES,INC., )

)Additional Counterclaim Defendants. )

MOHAMMAD HAMED,

PlaintiflV.

UNITED CORPORATION,

Defendant.

DUDLEY TOPPER

AND FEUERZEIG, LLP

1000 Frcdorlksb€rg Gade

P.O. Box 756

. Thomas, U.S. V.1.00804{756

@4oln4-u22

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LA\ry IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF'MOTIONTO STRIKE "HAMED'S RESPONSE RE JURY ISSUES"

Defendants/counterclaimants Fathi Yusuf and United Corporation (collectively,

"Defendants") submit this reply memorandum of law in further support of their October 14,2016,

motion for an order striking the document filed by Plaintiffs and entitled"Hamed's Response Re

Jury Issues" dated September 27,20l6,from the record.l

)))))))))))

Consolidated With

CIVIL NO. SX-14-CV-287

ACTION FOR DAMAGESAND DECLARATORY RELIEF

t,t;

l,

.,

I Citations in the form "Yusuf Mem." are to Defendants' Motion to Strike dated October 14,201,6. Citations in the form "Hamed Mem." are to Hamed's Opposition to Defendants' Motion toStrike Hamed's 'Response Re Jury Issues" dated October 18, 2016.

Hamed v. YusufCase No. SX-12-CV-370Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law - Motion to StrikePage2 of7

Plaintiffs' gift for misdirection is impressive. Rather than sticking to the subject matter

of the instant motion (timeliness) that Plaintiffs' know they cannot win, Plaintiffs devote nearly

their entire ten-page brief to additional arguments for denying Defendants' Septemb er 25, 2014,

motion to strike their jury demand. Plaintiffs toss in some procedural arguments that nominally

touch upon the issue of untimeliness, but they have no cogent answer concerning the

implications of failing to oppose Defendants' September 25,2014, motion until more than 700

days after the time for doing so had expired.

Plaintiffs' memorandum is nothing more than an impermissible second bite at the apple -one that fell from the tree more than 700 days ago.

Defendants would be justified in filing another motion to strike to rid Plaintiffs' papers of

all arguments except as addressed to untimeliness, but these Dickensian games must end

sometime. Instead, Defendants simply ask the Court to ignore Plaintiffs' new and out-of-place

arguments about waiver and focus only on the small portion of Plaintiffs' brief (i.e., Hamed

Mem. at2-4) that actually addresses the timeliness issue.

ARGUMENT

All Motion Practice'Was Not (Staycd" Bv The Court

Plaintiffs contend that they did not oppose Defendants' September 25,2014, motion to

strike their jury demand because. a general stay, including motion practice, had been ordered by

the Court on October 7,2014, that has not yet been lifted. (Hamed Mem. at 2.) Plaintiffs rely

exclusively upon statements made by Defendants' counsel in a motion fited by Defendants on

June29,2016, seeking emergency relief from certain subpoenas Plaintiffs had served upon third

DUDLEY, TOPPER

AND FEUERZEIG, LLP

1000 F¡ododksborg Gad€

P.O. Box 766

. Thomas, U.S. V.1.00804{756

(s$ln4-422

Hamed v. YusufCase No. SX-12-CV-370Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law - Motion to StrikePage 3 of7

party banking institutions around that time.2 (Id. at 2-3.) In Defendants' motion papers their

counsel Gregory Hodges does write that "[d]iscovery in this case has been stayed since October

7,2014." (/d. Exhibit I T 1.)

Hodges' statement is accurate. Discovery had been stayed by the Court. But that is not

relevant. A review of the transcript of the October 7,2014, court conference at which the Court

purportedly entered a stay confirms (l) discovery was stayed; but (2) only motions "ancillary to

the primary focus" of the case "that are not primary, or that are not required to be addressed"

were to be held in abeyance. (Exhibit A at 6-7 (transcript of l0l7ll4 conference).) No doubt for

this reason, Plaintiffs, through their counsel Joel Holt, filed motions on October 23, 2014 (two),

October 28,2014, March 16,2015, and May 4,2015. Plaintiffs also filed substantive responses

to motions made by Defendants on October 24,2014, and April 1,2015, and notices of filing for

various Rule 26 supplemental disclosures on April 9,2015, and April 23,2015. (Exhibit B (copy

of docket for ST-12-CV-370).)

Clearly, if a general stay had been ordered, Plaintiffs themselves violated it repeatedly.

In any event, it is obvious that no stay of the type described by Plaintiffs was ever

ordered by the Court.

From the amount of ink they spill on the subject, Plaintiffs clearly view Defendants'

motion to strike their jury demand as "primary," not "ancillary." At least they do now. But

Plaintiffs wake from their sleep over 700 days since the alarm clock rang. They missed the

school bus.DUDLEY, TOPPER

AND FEUERZEIG, LLP

1 000 FÌodoriksb€rg Gads

P.O. Box 75€

. Thomas, U.S. V.1.00804{756

p4qn4-4422

2 Defendants are curious as to why Plaintiffs served the subpoenas in 2016 if they truly believedthe Court had imposed a stay in 2014. To cop Plaintiffs' own style (Hamed Mem. at 5),Defendants are "VERY" curious.

Hamed v. YusufCase No. SX-12-CV-370Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law - Motion to StrikePage 4 of7

The best evidence that Plaintiffs' papers should be stricken? The fact that nowhere in

Plaintiffs' memorandum - nowhere - do they address (or even acknowledge the existence of)

LRCi 7.1(e)(1), Super. Ct. R. 9 and Super. Ct. R. l0(a)(2), the lynchpin of Defendants'

argument. (Yusuf Mem. at2-4.)3

Plaintiffs are no shrinking violets. That Plaintiffs stand mute on this key point speaks

volumes.

Indeed, Plaintiffs' brief contains no c¡tøt¡ons øt sll on lhe issue of timelíness. No

statutes. No cases. No court rules. Moreover, Plaintiffs make no attempt at all to distinguish

any of the cases and court rules cited by Defendants in support of their motion to strike. (See

Yusuf Mem. at2-6.)

As Defendants explained in their principal memorandum, Plaintiffs' only escape from the

consequences of their gross delay would involve proof of their "excusable neglect." (Yusuf

Mem. at 4.) Plaintiffs, however, never even attempted to make such a showing. Small wonder,

as Plaintiffs' mistaken belief (assuming arguendo they held one) that a general stay was in place

would not constitute excusable neglect. See Otoe County Nat. Bank v. W & P Trucking, Inc.,

754F.2d 881, 884 (1Oth Cir. 1985) (decided under "excusable neglect" provision in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b). Nor did Plaintiffs move first for the Court's permission to file the offending document

as required under LRCi 7.1(e)(1) and Super. Ct. R. 10(a)(2).

Plaintiffs' neglect is not excusable.

DUDLEY, TOPPER

ANO FEUERZEIG, LLP

1000 Fredelksb€rg Gadô

P.O. Box 756

. Thomas, U.S. V.1.00804{756

ls4o',n4-u2.

3 LRCi 7.1(e)(1) provides: "A party shall file a response within fourteen (14) days after serviceof the motion. For good cause shown, parties may be required to file a response and supportingdocuments, including brief within such shorter period of time as the Court may specify, or maybe given additional time upon request made to the Court." Super. Ct. R. 10(a)(2) provides: "Onmotion, permit the act to be done after the expiration of the specified peìiod if the failure to actwas the result of excusable neglect." Both are clearly cited throughout Defendants'memorandum.

Hamed v. YusufCase No. SX-12-CV-370Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law - Motion to StrikePage 5 of7

about

hand.

As indicated above, the bulk of Plaintiffs' memorandum is devoted to new arguments

the law of jury trial waiver. (Hamed Mem. at 4-9.) The Court must reject them out of

This issue has been fully briefed. Again, Defendants' motion was filed on September 29,

2014. Plaintiffs' opposition was filed on September 26,2016, although it is cagily captioned

"Hamed's Response Re Jury Issues." Defendants filed their reply on October 14,2016.

That Plaintiffs' opposition memorandum should be stricken does not mean that Plaintiffs

have a right to file a surreply. Pages 4 through 9 of Plaintiffs' October 18, 2016, memorandum.

are exactly that - an unauthorized surreply addressing an issue that the parties have already

briefed in full.

Pursuant to LRCi 7 .l(a), "[o]nly a motion, a response in opposition, and a reply may be

served on counsel and filed with the Court; further response or reply may be made only by leave

of Court obtained before filing," and the Court may sanction counsel for violation of this

limitation. Unless prior leave is sought and granted, a party has no right to file a suneply. See

Pollara v. Chateau St. Croix, LLC,2016 wL 2865874, *8 (Super. Ct. May 3, 2016) (D. Brady,

J.) ("Plaintiffs have not sought leave to file a surreply and have not filed any supplement to their

Opposition. As such, the Court has a complete record of all information necessary to determine

whether the gist of the action doctrine bars Plaintiffs'tort claims.").

Plaintiffs did not seek the Court's permission to file a surreply. Pages 4 through 9 of

Plaintiffs' brief must be disregarded, in connection with both this motion and Defendants'

September 2014 motion to strike.

CONCLUSION

Defendants' motion to strike should be granted.

DUDLEY, TOPPER

AND FEUERZEIG, LLP

I 00o Fr€dsrlksberg Gedo

P.O. Box 75ô

: Thomas, U.S. V.l.00804{756

(34Ðn4-442,

Respectfully submitted,

P.O. Box 756St. Thomas, VI 00804Telephone: (340) 7 15-4405Telefax: (340) 715-4400E-mail : ghodges@dtfl aw.com

Attorneys for Fathi Yusufand United Corporation

1000 Frederiksberg Gade

By: t/

November,2016,I served the foregoing via e-mail

Carl Hartmann, III, Esq.5000 Estate Coakley Bay,#L-6Christiansted, VI 00820Email : carl @carlhartmann. co m

Jeffrey B.C. Moorhead, Esq.C.R.T. Building1132 King StreetChristiansted, VI 00820Email : j effreymlaw@yahoo.com

CERTIFICATE OF' SERVICE

v-370Memorandum of Law - Motion to Strike

4th day of

Joel H. Holt, Esq.LA\ry OF'F'ICES OF JOEL H. HOLT2132 Company StreetChristiansted, V.I. 00820Email: holtvi@aol.com

Mark W. Eckard, Esq.Eckard, P.C.P.O. Box 24849Christiansted, VI 00824Email : mark@markeckard. com

The Honorable Edgar A. RossEmail : edgarrossj udge@hotmail.com

I hereby certify that on theaddressed to:

EXHIBIT A

t:z

r9

4

:5

6

I,9

[0

1,1

T2

t3;

1,{,

1,5;

tçL:l

1:8

,rg

øa

2,L

22

23

2,4

zt$

!ÌoHA!¡MAD,¡tåÞftE, by h,lÞ:au.jthorlz,ed ãgÞfrt IvAIJEËD HaMsD,

PI,ATNTTFF/GOUN.|ISRCIJAIM DE.FENÞANT T

V.

EAT[I.I. ,Yu$Uf' ar¡dr!rn¡.'19g O0RgoRarrolu,

DgEtsNDA}IlI S / COUNTEßQLA I.!4AN{8,

\jt.

I|ALÊEE :fIllMED¿ :l{AllEED tlAMEDlflttEEG,Þ: :HAMED¡ H:Ï,ûlIAlf HAIIED¡afrd, p-tr¡E$gEN,' Et{FgBB&rSE8,, rNC,,

.COT'NIrERCLA:I.M DEFENDANTS.

suFEBfoB COURT Qr :rflE VTRGTN ,ISI{ANDS'

DIVISION .O['. ST. CROTX.

'CA3E NO. ¡

,sx*Z012-cv*03,?;0

Tueg,day, Ocüober :?, aAL'A

ßi,.fl,e ,$t!þhlett lre4dé¡ Jrr'stlee GenterRRl 9000

Ktngehillr St. CroixU. S . Vlrgln :IsLänds 008S:O

RandaII .foo 'Be1'evllç' 'FCRR

gff i-ciaJ.,Gguf.t, Rgpogter(340) ?78-,97,50? Exü . 7tâ2

fctË ir¡hearinE,ü¡rdge,

1.I:46. ö,,ni.

I2

3

{

5

6

1

I

9

10

1I

tr?

,L3

:trtl

115

,t6

'Ll

1-8

19

20

¿t

22

23

24

26

On behal'f Bf ùlqÍr'arwad llamod::'

ùOEL¡ H.. lfOIJfr, :89O.I¡er¡¡:,Offf:c-êË öf J.oe.l Si ÉEl,b213?: Oompattttt gù.Eeêt,i Bt¡Lte, ?:ehris.tfja,ngtedr 8t; oro:Lx,U.Ss vlrgf¡l: ielandc 0:0gzi0Fh.c¡ne'¡ :t3,{0): ?73:8709rErualL:: hotrtvicaôI.com:

On, :behaL;f o:f, Wäh€éd,Hä¡ûed:

C.ABT HARTMANN, 'IIII Ð$g:,50,0:0 ,E.s.tate coakrey Ëå,y; # r,*eChr,l:.stfâogtêd, St. G¡o{¡r'O.S,¡. Vf'r.gtn r,süands 0:0820,Photiräi: (340) 7l:9r,8.9-41Emð'*ìL,i qaæ:l:ß,carfha¡.tütô{ut" çÆ.nr

on beha}f of Paghl. Yuguf q¡rd lJn,l'ted ,CotpctgtÏorr¡

GSßGgRY H. ltADGEf,¡ E*BQ:.Di¡iiÌ'By-r T,opper and :Ésugrze:l.g¡i I¡I;P,10i0:0 FrederLclíçþefg,GB-'de9q, thp.¡naeU'i 8::¡ ,Vf rgÍn: I€l,ánds: 0tg0{rPho¡r-e : ('340) 71 4-,4'4?'2Emq,Il-:¡ ghgdgesßdt Êùar{,,:doïi

NXãåR A. DEI4OOD, EEQ,Ëellood l¡aw FÍr¡n2-0.o6 Ea-stern oüburb, BuÍte ,102ehút stfäriFted¡ S!:r, :EEg,$x,

U.:$. Vfrgln Islande OO8ZOPher¡p:î (3,{'o) 7?3-344:4.Pma*I¡ tnfpGdeweod-Iaw,qem

'aPF,fiêRåNCtS

Ha$ed v. Yusuf

I2

I4

5

6

1

0

9

,10

'1L

,L2

,19'

I{,

1ã

¡16

17

r8,

19

20

'2r

22,

,2i&

24

2'

TAPPEfiRANOE.S (Gontlnuedf

On behat,Ë of. waIeed.,Hãtned¡ vfaheed ttamedr'!|tüfeed Ha¡ned. and; tllshan HãrueA;

MAXK,:!{. EÇt{ARDr Ego.Stanford G¡ir,f,bbeani üLC2104: H:ÍII 6.tr.eçtëhr,tpttaaÈtëd, SË. qrö:Ilru.9,¡, VX-cgls.r, trelsad¡ 0,082:0Phone ¡ '(3;40) ?13,140,0?Flnail ! narkßtller¡têclcêd,,. ÇoJn

on b:çhÊIf of

EE9'PC,

Hamed v, Yug.uf

I,2

3

A

,s

',6

I9

10

t1

I,2

13

x{

ng

1ú

I?

1S

r9

2,O

2t

'2:2

23

2A

25

PROCEEDINGS

(Be.IEphpnfs pröeeedings: ço¡n¡nènç.è at' tl::46, iB.m, )

T.HE CLERK,: 'Mohanmed Ha.med' eË aI. \¡etrgu..s EåUhi

Yug;uf and: Unfted, Çogpôration. , et. a'7;

rng Countr Good rnornlngr ggnÈlêroÉn,

MR. llOtr-rT¡ Good iaorrilnE, Youf flohor.

DdR.: HODGESi; .Góod morni.ng.

:!.{R¡, .EOKA'RÞ' Gqod mornlr¡gi .rIrËEÊ.,

- TllE couRT,: oould lroui put: yõur åppèaEãüces oü thg'

rigcQrd, Þ.Ieäsie?

NIR;' llO¡¡T: .foel flolt and. CarI HarÈnar¡n f,or the

ÞIÉil,ñtlff .

,!r|ß,., llQffiFS:: Sregor¡r,!.IÞd.pg:s ánd Ni:zar Déwo,pd fer the

dg f:endants/, gou4.t'e rçÌaimant s .

MR. ECKARÐ: Mark Ec'hard :f,ori counterelâtm

defendants.,

'l{R¡: MOûßHEAÞ: Go.od mg:rnlnEn Your ,}loaor. ,Ieffrey

Moçrbeaa ,orr p-ëhatrf .af PIeesên ;EnÈerprl.ses, Inc;

Tfl'E CO(Ix*T,l Very wçl} 9ì¡e arie hg:re for- a.'çtâ:tus

confçrenqÞ¡ l-{aÊËe:¡ ;Edgg.r R9þ,9 i:s wlth ¡ne ln :the :9.gurt.r,oo,m.

æt¡e f{,nst,thing ild }tke to s,ay i.s that'fi''tR nôt, eure

fios, lÈ:happened, büt we'rve g'ot à nêEùèr s'chçduleö,fo-r: .Èhùs

soÍrlnE Thurçday, october 9, and Ëherelg no need to harre that

hea:rlng ês We-lI as what werre doing todal' so that scheduled

matter wllt be cancéIed.

Hamed v. Yr¡suf

I2:

$

A

.5,

,6

I9

10

t,l

12

ï3

L'A

r,s

16

L1

L8

19

¿0

2t

22

2i,

2A

25

To IëÈ the ,parfies know, I wl}l :be faeufng an ôrder

gËåDt.i,ng tt¡e ÞIeinlif t t 9 i¡not,lon fö-r parÈ:íail gqryuaçy, J,udg:e.ment

ap. Uo'Ehei efi6t,encê, of, a pâJ:tnershlp. thaE.: ehouldnlt' be any

surprlge ÈQ anyçne¿ .g:iltge tha.t ôoncÊ.dêd iss.,uê f¡as ,ted ,ue tö

whe're we stand todai¡¿, bub j:!Is.È: to gêti çhät or.ù'th€ fecg.rdf

1:t,11 99 'äheqd ¿rnd l:sgue Þn oËder l:n t:hat rggard.,

I:rm sorry Lhat tË Èook'until thls moxnilng to get l¡ou

the: dosuniénü Ëhat was êent öut by eqmaíl this únoräíng

e{ttiËled o¡dêr Splicù,Êlry €or-drÉnts, Otijectfons' and

RecommendaÈi,ons, I las$ì.¡me ¡¿ourve had a c.hanog -tq !a¡(e a ,look

á.È À.t.

Hfe only üh.tngF :I ,t,lrÙnK tha:t are of: 'st gníf,Ícanee and

dlff,e.nent, than what ha:s þEen p'res,en,t.ed. vlould be Èhe

tdênt'ifücåtdon of Mi- 'lusrrf as a triqrildat:lng þaúta-êÉ. Along

thoge :I.Ineg¡: l,t'tis tecognl;?Êd. thåt, ,.aE lJal,,Eciôf's pllnc;ipal and

Bregidçn:F-¡ tJiere êrg Lqie,uqp ef conf,I,jr,ct :petçnLi,aIly, but'

alnc.s that ,ro1e f.s going tþ he under the supe:rvlsl,on and ,with

the þãrrËd,cipation o'f the Mäster, I ani, d-ohifiderrt Èhat, :üo the

extent Uhat those lssues .are not abl,e to be resoLved, that

the'l[aeter wllJ. be able bo. mêke sure that 'ehêr,e are no

prob,Iems arie.lng fr,g.'m å'ny conflici b-é,Èwe_gn- the intêrÞþts o.f

Untted,a,nd the roLe of, Mr; Yusuf a,e llquldatfr¡g partner.

Qf çþqrsq, tnLe other natters .o-f, gfgniËicangp ih

there pr,{marily woutrd þe Èhe proposed,rnãttn€ü ln whlch each: .of

bhe th¡reê stqreg vrflJ. þe dtstributed from the partnefshfp,,

Hamed v. Yusuf

:1.

2.

3

4

5

,6,

I,9

,19

1:1

,L?

'13

lA

;f'S

:16

'L1.

.1,8

19

2a

2t

22

23,

24

2'5

and the bottom jltne in thls otder s,endg the partieÞ tg vtörk

wlt-h ùhe Mad'tref ltanedt,ately .sg þtla! you eEn,have an

oppo¡rEu-nity. Èö fl-eah out your :oorrcÊrnsr and then requlfes

that eacl¡ S,tüe, giUbrntt a writteh res.pörisê tO this pfoposáI

wiËhi¡i 14 day.s f,rom today., Yës,.¿ f,rom Ëoday.

in ö. irde:r to ällow Lhe partles to -- á.Dd agaln, when

'r tal:k about ltthe partlêgrr'' l.ir, Eekärd and Mr. Moorhead, i,È's

nat out of Ìäêk öf:reepect for yoü $uys7 or:havlng no

Intere-sit +n youÊ,partícipat;fonr, b¡¡t ltrb re:atly plaintfff and

defendant who qre the pri,me Btrê:lçetrs, ,and the atovetrs hetre, ahd

f .þel'févë thaL al! ,sf the lssú.e€ *- 'I am: hope-fu.l :ttiat al,l of

thp t.s,quèlr å.q .tö: the Cl,fpn,l,g of: !fr;, :Egrkafd :åf,id Mr:., ú4sp¡head,

brêlng secondâry ,to the ptlrnary part,iesr that, thoae h+pef.ulJ,y

çan þe fb.Ìded into $that.êver r'esofrtt:ton fs golng. tö be.

äedomþll:Ehed,

But to alJ.ow ,focus ,on e

plan, I r',m gofng' to stal, di-ecovery f,or the tíme betngl subject

I

tso any partf.És' .suggesti.pn bhiiü Uliete .le 'a nêed tô rëopen

dfeoover:y f:or any garllcular pì¡qpose, ënd we car¡: dcr that" ancl

al,go FuÞJ'ect to the recom¡nendatlg¡t, o,F the ,Madterr :wtro wlllIrear any: ptirt!¡ 'i{llo haS a SuggeEþiq.q ttlat. A, cerîtä.i4 ,eortrponent

o.f dlsoovefy needs to'bê addrësËëd prêsenttr¡r,

picture, and seelng ff vr-e can cone up wt,lh a pJ.âfi for- going

' But ùs ,allo¡,r f,oçu6 ,gR tryùng .ç.o, look ag Èhç :big

föntard, I!m gçtng to etay dlsêover:y otherwl€e,,

Hamed v. lusuf

uhç

fo

I2

3

'q,

5

:6

As ev€r'ybody has BGêrÌ¡ we håftenr,t been proactfve 'f.n

deeL.ing wi:th -- I lost e-ou,nL,q:but f :woufd s,qy ltls aÇÇuraLe

.tó s:ay dozens:of: pendÍng motíonsr; tr ,donrt know:ho¡ many;, but

,Èhêre 's a iot of nÇc.lo,nc óuu 't

prtmary f,ocuq -- :arê ,ygg:'s'Ë.íiLl- thçËer gerr:tlempn?

1

II

x0

.f1

1?

13

'.'L4

1E

L6

1,?

t8

19

.2.0

2L

22

z3

24

2s

tIR, ftrOtrT: tesr Your llonorr,

THE COURT¡ Oka,y.

MR. HODGEÐ,I Yes¡ Your. ltonor¡

BllE CO0RT: Okay. 'û[e Jue;t, had a power flash here.

Fo e'lm1I.ar to t-he discovÊry, ne arþ goir¡g tg

contintre .Lo leave in abeyanse thos,-e mgtiqr'ts that are not

Þrlnäiy, e^r that. aüè not'requi,qed to be addr€.s:9€dr to come

wfth a plan ånd'a proposal for moving forwørd, and once

a$,aln, ôf ¡cour,aê :subJeät to any ÞÊr.Ëy indl-cating .thät: the¡e

f,.s' å aee!,,to: addrîeg:s ¡¡,part,leulari motíonn :a f)ârtleulan Lssue,

and subJgct as wel"L tq the rèpo.¡lmeliidêtton ctf EhÞ l'last,er.

The order t.hab you rècèf.ved' thls ,mornÍng reguÍr.es

thät Êhe pê.rt:les meet tog.Çthèr: wltli the Mâ'çtêr; And ln

addiËlon to takÍn9: a lo.ok at: the planr wê rwiÌÌ ,Þq *- I knou

'the:re are' iseuê.s related t,s the re$ts thôt aËê due ât Plaizå

Eaqt, anri that would be an igsþe qhat ;the parti es need t,o

cohtinue :di.scussions wi.th the Master concerníng.

'And, the largë :portùon of thè work, i-t sèems to me,

that la gqfrlg þo be taikl¡lg placg¡ ls ldenElfyiqg and

cataloglng Bartnê.rshlp assets and forging a plan for Èhe

Hamed v. Yusuf,.

I2

3

4

5

6

7

I,9;

1,q

11

l2

13

14

1,,5

1-6

L7

18

19

a0

2L

22

23

.24

25

Ilgu{daE$on oi dfstrlbutfon of those assêts' And, alL of that,

aaa 'bç dp¡e ,Ín tf¡e conLexÊ of *orlci,49 wí-tl¡ the Ma.gter

conoe.rhÍng ,pr¡t,-ting together :the Futs and bslts of, the Þ.lan,

That'S what I hai¡ê thfs rnorriing.r änd tr'¡m, wtLling'

to -- I gueeo f should ¿gk Judge Rgesr 1e there anyt,þi.¡g

you-:,d like to add to thati llud,ge?

JUDGE ROSS: Nothing additional-.

,THE COURT I Sàn f heâ'r from .Mi. ilt¿¡sfl, what -*

t{R. BotiTi IeEr :Yoq¡ Hö.aor, ,Èhis fs JoþI tlolt, TWo

potrnt9¿ one sit[pre one, gnd that fsl Yot¡ also have a status

.cöh,fériengê 8'êt for T'banks.g'fv{nq, f take,lt' that ls o,ff?

--- -OUßT:: 'WeT'IJ' Ëa'ke it öfif.i

Dan. ,HOú,f r A'LI rJ;ght, seoo'ndlyr I thitnk whl.le we'ire

,a1,1 on, tlre, þhons,r' mäyhe it mighË :he hè.IÞfi¡l Ëo Þry to s'et uÞ

ançther'n¡eê:ti:lnà $rith .tudgÞ, \Ð9â¡ s:l'nce, he:'.s golng to :þe

tq,hi'ug ov€.f,., I don:! t knovl: if he wFintg t,o dÞal w{th thj.s

4f,tèr thts, or lf y.ou wänt tö: tallÉ abÖut some t:ime nov,r.

THE :çoüRl ¡ Judgé? Do you waitt Ls h.ea'r f rQm

Jüdge Ros,s çn that ríÇht now?

MR'. HOI¡T ¡ 'Ye$:,i that nould: be f'lne.

gtt'DcE RoSS,: ,att.orne:y,HoIt., bhlg i8 Edgar RQss.

llhat I woutd eugges.t fs that I get, in touch wlt'h the

atgo¡491¿s. à'nd .th.e;y ,fi:nd' â :qülg:able' dête and let re kdow,

,because llm al.$¡åy,s 4vaÅlable. Sóme, o,f lrog åre privaÈe,

slng.le pqaçtftionetrsr, End f donrt want to:eet a date'that

I

Hamed v, Yusuf,

.:

I2

3

{

I6

I

9

10

1[

L2'

13

14

1S

16

17

x8

1.:9

à:o

2t

22:,

23

24,

25

intgrfefe:p wlLþ Vpúf P'rac.tice, ,SQ I, would gend y9u'.à ÞÔtice

.e*,ther t,gday ot Eomorrpw, asktng you +rhen, you, wouLd, l-,i.ike Ëo

;¡¡¡qêt'

MR. HO.lTri :OikaY. I thtnk tn*sEts really al'I I have'

'T-ha 'pÉtrü.{,ee dld qc. tual,}y agÉèg to ã ilÊlt sehedullng ördér¡ but

.t Euçqs lrf yotrrÉ- s.ugp.end:ir.¡g that Loo, that'''g a rnoo-t:fspue at

tluts pOlnt. Sôr Greg¡ ,f tll turn the :floor -- Yot¡r }lonor,

bhat:rs Í,t föF HA$gd,r.

'1¡¡g: ,qa$STi ÍÞank you.

:MR¡ :HO-ÐGESi, 'ihank you, YoUr }iorior, [hlg .ls: Grê91

:tiodgês. :I real.try don',:t have ahythiiìE to add. 'Obvd-orisly, 'f

Çhinls ,wer Ll aeëd tþ rev:tew yaur 9rdþt ,wi.th auE reEBeÇtürte

:ellents, ¿¡dlgêt; to$ether wlth Attol'nelf tfol,t and ,xudge Roasi

pefhaÞq At,troüney,tfolt iínit-ially, änd then settlrig uþ a

:rn-êät:ing ',wfttr ,Judge Roas at his ,eonvenlence '

ßHü êtUfiT,l Okay, very good' And I -- yoü all

âfê := I appTeq{Eüe th.e degree¡ èo vi}rtch êveryorlê :fs nllling

UO acCOnmOdate eac-h other, but ,norr ¡re do havè a, ÈrlaI dage of

DeCerUher ln :f,Or +rhat ùhat'e wotth,¡ and I WahE tO continue to

keep that, ;dq,tg: al'ÍVre¡ Fnd 9o, I dor¡'! t 'vfefit to þavç,' Us g:t:ttfng

oh: thériij :ine.ë:ùend.

Ysu aäh eee 1n uhtr:É cr.rdçr thaÈ $ou lrèÛe,lved t'hLs

iäotnlhg, it r:equires conments wlthin 14 days' Ird lfke to

try to etlÇ'li, !o 'thêtrr ahd thaL -- eo !haÈ' s golng ,t'o

enÇoura,ge y9u to get together with ,Judge Ross a8 sooR as

Hamed v. Yusuf

"l

I

?

3

4

5

6

1

g'

Ix0

11

T2

L3

14

15

15

T1

18

19

?0

2L

2:2

2:3

2:A

2'5

:V9rl'rre: dþIe to do :so. A$d as rludg.e Ross,.ha:e sa'fd.r hê.wÌ}J-

ma;kq: hf¡IìEélf aväiIAblêr ând trlII Jua:t leêite.fÈ to: yôu'to work

'ottt 'thocie, detaÍ:Is q

,lllR¡ flol,T.¡ AItr ríEht, Yóur Hcjnor:¡ Thanh y,ou'

i¡¿R. 'AoDêpsl 'Yout Honor, thls fe: G¡reg Ílodges., r

'dónrt:krrolr lf üudge Rosg has had an öÞPofgunlt'y to share 1"'1th

youi but io¡e of Èhe ur,ifoËtunately fãw'thinSs that Attorney

:Holt: erut I a.grged on recent:I¡l was ê¡n eatengton of the

dlscovery, pe.rtod¡ the ,faetual dLscovery perJ:od through

,De'c'ènÌ)elr ,':15,, the expent ln,ltial report Þëllod untll ',Ianuary

30;: the reþut:tal tepo-rt untll. Màrch Znd tr: :be'trlçver and the

eio;sg :of 'Þ:ipe:rt, dlsäovery untll Arc:rll 6, Thäù, was based qfr

thê gndêr;Ëtarrül¡Ig th¡IÈ bhe .q.f1ar date öf ÞecelÞer 1 w:as not

reatist{ç $nd- r the: chcu4stancee.

Obvlousty, ri€ 'tilof¡rt contsr,oL yèuË dÖ'cket'r, ånd Ëhoie

wç:Eq: J.us,t: É_UgEnstions tþ4t we r.¡€r€ :prê'Pat9d go sqbmlt üo the

:Oö.ur,È, buf :tr wo.u,!d. respect:fu1ly sub¡nlt that thp¡. You know --gtvên:thç sùay pf,.di:eqOvery tha! youìve taiked aÞout ln tlri.s

cénfetrence, and the, r.teÊd fqr furtheg d'isçovery, Ëhat' those

agrçed. date.s ought'to,þe f.avoqa-o*Iy congldg^.red by t.tre Courg.

ΡlE COURT ¡ ttas thåt 'beèrt f iled?

.t'lR. ftoT,Ji No.

¡¡n. nOOePS: f rm solrlf?

!{R., flOI,Tl No, we teached thaL aEreemerit thi"s

mclrnf ng.

10

Hamçd v, Yusqf

t

2

3

4

Þ

6'

1

B

I10

Ln,

t2,

13

L4

ls'

16,

fl'1,8

Lg

20,

ir22

z3

24

'25

FHE'GOURII'¡ ,úIetrI, r¡Ihy don't we -- tr nean:' f r.ltl

amênable ì+- etüerl¡b.ody has knqw¡I fgr- qglte soÍre tLme: tha!

trfa,l :on EêoernbêË ! 1s noL real.i.st{c'f but, my lnterest here ig

nst so mr¡ch dofng anythi.ng ot,her than ü{yihg to ¡nafntain

f,ocr¡s èh the big picture a,nd the, end. gâmqr as opposed to

fif llng Ln the gap,s at,qng: Èhp sIdÞf inet.

Itis also my intentdon not bo sÈay diecovery, with

the ldÊa :fha,t thts tç going ¡e' prol'ong thlnEs. To the

contr.äry¿ thê tlrl-ñklng fs:i 1ç $hât :!f We'cên fsçue ôji the: end

resu.lt¡ then perhaps F.ome ,of Ëlre !s's'ges, ttrat are :de;etçd

:inpo.r.tanü notv, andr gome of thO: dlsco¡¡Ë:ry thA:tt is deëinêd

'¡¡ëoeçaar.i noir, $e!¡,turn,out not bo'be rtêc,e8sary'

As I satrd before, trm open to any reconnondatlo¡l

:f¡o.n the: ;Masitgr, .of rngtio.n ,ffOm the parliee,r fhat the stay of

:Giûscove:ey i,s' ccunÈenprodr¡ctiver but¡ fgr the t:ine be.t¡rg, at

lÊ:ast :tö g:Íve yg,l¡ .äJ.I the oppgnËUnt$y: Lo ii$ê,qt wtth .rJ¡Idge Roes

:pË.€sentL!r: end lhe qp-pçttunfty to get ê rg*ponse 04 the

:Þ:rôÞOËeä structurê'of the ÞIan" EoT ät leas,t that'perlod of

tiiBq, the dtscovêEy wlII be s,taye.d. Ahd as f sald, .Irm open

fsr drlsct¡ssf.oçr, E,ug:ge-g,tlol.¡s ag tþ hqw end 1f and '1rheÐ lt

"needs to be revfslbed.

f,s there anythJ"ng f:ron Atlorr¡:ey Eck¿¡rd or At.torney

Mirorhead?

[lR. EC¡r,eRO: t'lob îroin AttörnÞy: Eckard, Yot¡r Honor.

MR. IIOORHEAD: No, Your llono¡.

I

'¡'(

11

Hamed v. Yusuf

'1

2

3

:¿

5

6

?

:8

:9

1,0

1ù

t?

Ls-

,Lf

:15.

1F,

'l?

1g

19i

,?$

2T

22

2g

2;:A

2:5

t

r{,,

tH:E OÖIJhT ¡ VeÍlt ¡lell. Attorney t{ö}t, Attot:hey

Hodgês¿, aüything' eilF:e larg shg.t¡.ld. þê :FëAoqlPldshing fhi9,

'I808ûlng?

!llB, tlo.t$: ÑQr Y:qef Hsno.P.

Un. RODGES,: 'tr;, elont'g t- Ín)t o:o; Yôur Honot'' thank'

¡ror: for your tifip:,

TEE COURT¡ O-kay, g-enûÌemeni, TÌ,.rank you ve'ry. mr¡ch.

f ap.¡rr.ecläüe yoür ,t:tiltè. thle lnotnlng a¡id IoOt< f:orlvard to

hêa!.lng¡ fþpsr yqr¡ shoEtlü|, ,,aod,,l,Oôff ,fo.fwagd to :hçafi'ng Eood

fêports aÞorrt yauf üeeflngg, wllh üudgg Ross.

Thát Wl.trL :ëoriefr¡de $hå¡t riyêt're: Eo'fng to ôo thÌs:

'urogl¡*ng?, :tlrgrrk'¡l-otl,.

[48,, :tlOLrT l, :Tha¡tk your: :Yöur rHohgù:'

l¿x. HOOCge: 'Thank 'you, TCIt¡t ilor¡or'

:(P¡opeed{.nga Gone,l.udêi :¿g !tt 05)

r2

Hamêd v; Yust¡f

EXHIBIT B

MOI-üAMMAD I{AMËD BYHISAUTH. AGENTWALEED HAMED

V$.

UNITED CORPORATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ¡SLANDSDIVISION OF ST. CROIXCIVIL DOCKET

PARFí NAME

DEWOOD, N|ZARA.

Plaintiff)))))

MOHAMII/IAD HAMED BY HISAUTH. AGENTWALEED HAMED,

HOLT, JOEL H

HARTMANN ESQ., CARL

UNITED CORPORATION,

DIRUZZO, ilt ESQ., JOSEPH A.

YUSUF, FATHI

Defendant )

CASE NO: SX-2012-CV-0000370

FltlNG DATE: September 17,2012

JUDGE: Hon. DouglasA. Brady

CASE TYPE: DAMAGES - CIVIL

SECONDARY NUII

PETITION

LITIGANT PARWTYPE

9000 ATTORNEYFORDEFENDANTOR

PO0l

POot

P00t

t(tÐt-uNuE,N I

PI.AINTIFF

ATTORNEY FORANY OTHERPARTY

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF ORPETITIONER

DEFENDANT

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT ORRESPONDENT

DEFENDANT

D002

D002

Page 1 of37

DOCKET DATE

0713112016

07t06t2016

DESCRIPTION

LIQUIDATING PARTNER,S THIRD BI-MONTHLY REPORT; SUBMITTED BY GREGORYHODGES, ESQ, AND NIZAR DEIA'OOD, ESQ.

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER07t02J2015JOEL HOLT, ESQ. GREORY HODGES, ESQ.CARL HARTMANN, ESQ. EFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.NtzAR DEWOOD, ESQ. HON. EDGAR D. ROSS(EMAIL)MARK ECKARD, ESQ.

ORDER SIGNED THAT THE LIQUIDAT¡NG PARTNER, UNDER THE SUPERVISION OFTHE MASTER, SHALL BE GRANTED ACCESS TO PI.AZA EXTRA MERRILL LYNCHACCOUNT (NO. 14G07759, tN THE NAME OF UNITED CORPORATION, SOLELYFOR PURPOSE CONSISTENTWTH WNDING UPTHE HAMED.YUSEF PARTNERSHIP

SIGNED BYJUDGE DOUGI-ASA. BRADY

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER BY FIKISHA HARRIS

DOCKETS ENTERED ON THIS GASE:

07102/2016

07t01t2016

06t29t2015

JOELHOLT, ESQ. CARLHARTÍì,AN, ESQ.MARK ECKARD, ESQ. JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.NIZAR DEWOOD, ESQ.

MASTER'S ORDER RE CLOSING OUTALL BANKAOCOUNTSAUTHORIZED BYTHEHAMM ED-YU SUF PARTNERSH I P I N BANCO POPUI.AR AND SOCTIABAN K ANDTRANSFERRING THE FUNDS THEREIN TO THE GI.A¡MS RESERVEACCOUNTASMANDATED BYTHE LIQUIDATION ORDER HEREIN ENTERED BYTHE COURTONJANUARY 7,2O15i SIGNED BY JUDGE EDGAR D. ROSS

ORDER SIGNED BYJUDGE DOUGI.ASA. BRADY;THAT PI.AINTIFF'S MOTIONANDMEMORANDUM IN SUPPORTOF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PORTION OFRENTORDER IS DENIED

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER06/05/2015JOEL HOLT, ESQ.;CARL HARTMANN III, ESQ.NIZAR DEWOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.II/LARK ECKARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.HON. EDGAR ROSS(edgarrossjudge@hotmall.com)

LIQUI DATI NG PARTNER'S SECOND BI -MONTHLY REPORTSUBMITTED BYGREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

NOTICE OF FILING PI-AINTIFF HAMED'S 13TH SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26INIDIAL DISCLOSURES RECEIVEDATTYJOEL H. HOLT

OPPOS]TION TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF PORTION OF RENT ORDERSUBMITTED BYGREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONAND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FORRECONSIDERATION OF PORTION OF RENTORDER

SUBMITTED BY HOEL HOLT, ESQ.

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER04t30t2015JOEL HOLT, ESQ.;CARLHARTMANN III, ESQ.;NIZAR DEWOOD, ESQ.;GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.;ÀTARK ECKARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.;HON. EDGAR ROSS (edganossjudge@hotmail.com)

0610512015

06/051201õ

06t02t2016

t$ o5t1st2o16

f, osltzzors

.tf oaoalzors

0610412015

AM@NI

Page2oI37

o*to,rol5 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER04t28t2015JOEL HOLT, ESQ.;CARL HARTMANN l¡1, ESQ.;NIZAR DEWOOD, ESQ.;GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.;MARK ECKARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.;HON. EDGAR D. ROSS (edgarrossjudge@hotmail.com)CASHIER

MASTER'S ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER OF OìANERSHIP OF PLAZA EXTRATUTUPARK, ST. THOMAS SIGNED BYTHE HONORABLE EDGAR D. ROSS, JUDICIALMASTER

MOTION TO CI-ARIFY/MODIFY RELEASE OF PI BONDAND ORDERSUBMITTED BYJOEL HOLT, ESQ.

FILE RETURNED TO THE CLERKS OFFICE

0413012016

0412912015

04t28t2016

ou28t2016 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER04t27nuíJOEL HOLT, ESQ.; CARL HARTMANN III, ESQ.NIZAR DEWOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.MARK ECI(ARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.HON. EDGA;RffiOS9@garossi@CASHIER

04t28t2016

04t2812016

MASTER'S ORDER REGARDTNG BIDD¡NG PROCEDURES FOR OWNERSHIP OF PI.AZAEXTRA.TUTU PARK SIGNED BY EDGAR D. ROSS, JUDICIAL MASTER

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER04n8nu5JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ,; CARL HARTMANN ll¡1, ESQ.;NIZAR DEVIIOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.;II4ARK ECKARD, ESQ.: JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.;

04t28t2016

o4t2712016

HON. EDGAR D. ROSS (edganossjudge@hotmail.com)

SECOND SUPPLEMENTALORDER RE RELEASE OF BOND SIGNED BYJUDGE DOUGTASA. BRADY

MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND ORDER SIGNED BYJUDGE DOUGI.ASA. BRADY;TI-IATPI-AINTIFF'S MOT¡ON FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED, IN PART, ASTO PI.AINTIFF'S CI.AIMSTHATTHE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS PRECLUDESDEFENDANT UNITED'S CI.AIMS FOR PAST DUE RENT

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDERut27nu5JOEL HOLT, ESQ.;CARL HARTMANN lll, ESQ.;NIZAR DEV\IOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.;MARK ECI(ARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.;HON. EDGAR ROSS (edganossjudge@hotmail.com);JUDGESAND MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT;LAW CLERKS; LAW LIBRARY; lT; RECORD BOOK

ORDER FOR DISCHARGE OF THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BONDAND RELESE OFPROPERTYAND CASH SECURING SAID BOND SIGNED BYJUDGE DOUGLASA.BRADY

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RELEASING BOND SIGNËD BY JUDGE DOUGLAS A. BRADY

NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURESSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTATION OFTHE RECORDSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

PI.AINTIFF HAMED'S SUPPLEMENTAL ULE 26 DISCLOSURESSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

Page 3 of 37

0412712016

o4t27t2015

0412712016

04t2312016

o4t0912016

ouogt2016

lÁ

r*

g$. oaoslzots

$ o4toit2oll

$. oalaolzots

0312712016

fioanuzots

0310912015

NOTICE OF FILING PIÁINTIFF HAMED'S RULE 26INITIAL DISCLOSURESSUBMTTTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

REPLYTO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RELEASE OF PI BOND

'€UBMITTÊD BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

OPPOSITION TO PTAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELEASE OF PI BONDALONG WTHLIQUIDATING PARTNER.S FIRST BI- MONTHLY REPORT; SUBMITTED BYGREGORYH. HODGES, ESQ.

MANDATE, OPINION OF THE COURTAND JUDGMENT RECEIVED FROM SUPREMECOURT

MOTIONAND M EMORANDUM FOR RELEASE OF PI BOND FILED BY JOEL HOLTALONG WTH A PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISCHARGE OF THE PRELIMINARYINJUNCTION BONDAND RELEASE OF PROPERTYAND CASH SECURING SAID BOND

NOTICE OF ENTRYOF ORDER03/09/2015JOEL HOLT, ESQ.; NIZAR OEWOOD, ESQ.;MARK ECKARD, ESQ.; CARL HARTiIANN lll, ESQ.;GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.; JEFFREY B.C. MOORHEAD, ESQ.;HON. EDGAR ROSS (edganossJudge@hotmail.com)

MASTER'S ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER OF OV\NERSHIP OF PIAZA EASTSIGNED BY EDGAR D. ROSS, JUDICIAL MASTER

MASTER'S ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF PI-ì¿,AEXTRAWESTSUBMIfiED BYEDGAR D. ROSS, JUDICIALMASTER

ORDER DEI.IYING STAY PENDTNG APPEAL SIGNED BY JUDGE DOT.IGLAS A BRADY

NOTICE OF ENTRYOF ORDER BY FIKISHAHARRIS02f272015NIZAR DEVI/OOD, ESQ.GREGORY H. HODGES, ESQ.JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ.CARLHARTMANNIIII ESQ.MARKW. ECKARD, ESQ.JEFFREY B.C. MOORHEAD, ESQ.

SUPREME COURTS JUDGMENTAND OPINION OFTHE COURTRE: ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND THAT THEINSTANT APPEALS AND CROSS .APPEAL ARE DISMISSED FOR IACK OFJURISDIGTION;ORDERED THATTHE MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEALAND THE MOTION FORLEAVETO Ð(CEED PAGE LIMITATION FOR PRINCIPALAND REPLY BRIEFSAREDENIEDAS MOOT;

SUPREME COURTS ORDERRE: ORDERED THAT ON OR BEFORE 4:OO P.M. ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24'2015 APPELIANT SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO APPELLEES' MOTION TODISMISS;

STIPULATION RECEIVED, WTH CONSENT ANDAPPROVAL OF THE MASTER, TOAMENDTHE COURTS ORDERADOPTING FINALWND UP PI.ANSUBMITTED BYJOEL HOLT, ESQ. A NIZAR DEWOOD, ESQ.

FILE FORWARDEDTO JUDGE'S CHAMBER

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEKA DETERMIMTION FROM THE SUPREME COURT ONMOTION FOR STAY OF PORTIONS OF JANUARY 7,2015 ORDER PENDING APPEALBY DATE CERTAIN IF THE SUPERIOR COURT DOES NOT RESOLVE SUCH MOTION

SUBMITTED BY GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

03/0612015

0310512015

02t2712016

oa27,2016

o2t27t2016

oa2a2u6

oaßt2016

oaßt2016

02i10t2016

Page4 ol37

0.00

ooro,roru

02110t2016

0210912016

0210612016

0a0612016

0210412016

oa0412016

02t0u2016

oa0a20ß

01t3012016

0112s12016

REPLYTO HAMED'S OPPOSIT¡ON TO MOTION FOR S-rAY OF PORTIONS OF

JANUARY 7, 2015 ORDER PENDING APPEALSUBMITTED BY GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

REPLYTO PLESSEN'S OPPOSITION TO YUSUF'S MOTION FOR STAY OF PORTIONS

OF JANUARY 7,2015 ORDER PENDING MOTION APPEAL GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTATION OF THE RECORD RE THE PEND¡NG MOTION TO

STAYSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

PLESSEN'S OPPOSITION TO YUSUF'S MOTION TO STAY PART OF THE

LIQU¡DATION ORDER PENDTNG APPEAL RECEIVED; FILED BY JEFFREY B.CMOORHEAD, ESQ.

REPLY TO PLESSEN'S OPPOSITION TO YUSUF'S MOTION FOR STAY OF PORTIONS

OF JANUARY 7,2015 ORDER PENDINGAPPEALSUBMITTED BY GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

CERTIFIED DOCKET FORWARDED TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN

ISI-ANDS, ORDERS

HAMED'S OPPOSTION TO YUSUF'S JANUARY 29 TH MOTION TO STAY PART OF

THE LIQUIDATION ORDER PENDING APPEALSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

CERTIFIED DOCKET FORWARDED TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRG¡N

ISLANDS, ORDERAND INDEX

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTATION OF THE RECORDSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

NOTICE OF VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION

FAHTIYUSUF'S MOTION TO STAY OF PORTIONS OF JANUARY 7,2015 ORDER

PENDINGAPPEAL, BRIEF IN SUPPORTOF MOTION FOR STAYOF PORTONS OF

JANUARY 7,2015 ORDER PENDINGAPPEALAND ORDERSUBMITTED BY GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

DOCKETING ORDER SIGNEDSUBMITTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

NOTICE OF APPEAL RECEIVEDSUBMITTED BY THE SUPEREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

ORDERAPPROVING STIPULAT¡ON SIGNED BY JUDGE DOUGLASA. BRADY

NOT¡CE OF ENTRY OF ORDERun7t2014JOEL HOLT, ESQ.; CARL HARTMANN !¡1, ESQ.;NIZAR DE\ IOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.;

llr,ARK ECI(ARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.;

HON. EDGAR ROSS (edgarrossjudge@hotmail.com)

STIPUTATE, WITH THE CONSENTAND APPROVAL OF THE MASTER, TO AMEND THE

COURTS ORDERADOPTING FINALWND UP PI.ANAND ORDERSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ. & NIZAR DEV\IOOD, ESQ.

E.RECORD PREPAREDAND SUBMITTED TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN

tst-ANDs

SCHEDULING ORDERSUBMITTED BYTHE SUPREME COURT OFTHEVIRGIN ISI.ANDS

CERTIFIED DOCKET FORWARDED TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRG¡N

ISIANDS, ORDERS AND INDEX

01t2912016

01t2812015

01//2712016

o1t2712016

0112612016

01t26t2016

01t13t2016

oil1a20ß

Page 5 of 37

0110912016

0110712016

0110712016

0110612016

01t0512016

1z1il2014

1210512014

1A0612014

NOT¡CE OF ENTRY OF ORDERuß7nuíJOEL H. HOLT, ESQ.; GARL HARTMANN lll, ESQ';NIZARA. DEWOOD, ESQ,;GREGORY H. HODGES, ESQ.;MARK W. ECKARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY B.C. MOORHEAD¡ ESQ'

ORDERADOPTING FINALWND UP PI.AN SIGNED BY JUDGE DOUGLASA. BRADY

FINALWND UP PLAN OFTHE PI-M.AEXTRAPARTNERSHIP SIGNED BYJUDGEDOUGI.ASA. BRADY

NOTICE OF APPEAL RECEIVEDSUBMITTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISI.ANDS

DOCKETING ORDERSUBMITTED BYTHE SPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISI.ANDS

NOTTCE THAT THE CURRENT REGISTERED AGENT FOR PLESSEN ENTERPRISES,INC. IS JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.

SUBMITTE DBY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE DOUGI-AS A. BRADY; Tl-lATDEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER12t05t2014JOEL HOLT, ESQ.; CARL HARTi,ANN, ESQ.NIZAR DEì/\ÍOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.; MARK ECKARD, ESQ.HONORABLE EDGAR D. ROsS(edganossjudge@hotmail.com)JUDGESAND MAGISTRATES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTl-AW CLERKS; LqW UBRARY; lT; RECORD BOOK

ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE DOUGI.AS A. BRADY; THAT PI.AINTIFF'S RENE!\,EDMOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENTAS TO THE EXISTENCE OF APARTNERSHIP IS GRANTED

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER111O7t2014JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ.;CARLJ. HARTMANN lll, ESQ.;NIZARA. DEWOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY H. HODGES, ESQ.;MARKW ECKARD, ESQ.;JEFFREY B.C. MOORHEAD, ESQ.;HON. EDGAR D. ROss(edganossjudge@hotmail.com)

DEFEDNANTS'RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S RENEì/VED MOTION TOSHOWCAUSE DATED OCTOBER 23,20144ND MOTIONTO SHOWCAUSE DATEDocToBER 28,2014SUBMITTED BY NIZAR DEI/VOOD, ESQ.

NOTICE OF WTHDRAWALOFALL PRIOR MOTIONSTO SHOWCAUSE WTH ORDERRE PENDING MOTIONSTO SHOWCAUSESUBMITTED BY: JOEL H. HOLT

FATHIYUSUF'S RESPONSETO HAMED'S COMMENTS CONCERNING THE OOURTSPROPOSED WND.UP PLAN WITH AfiACHMENTS FILED BY GREGORY H . HODGES,ESQUIRE..

PI.AINTIFF HAMED'S RESPONSETO DEFENDANTS COMMENT RE PROPOSEDWNDING UP ORDER FILED BYATTORNEYJOEL H. HOLT

MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO ACCESS TO STORE INFORi,/IATION ANDCOMMUICATION WTH EMPLOYEES/STAFF VENDORS FILED BYATTORNEY JOELHOLTWTH EXHIBITSATO DAND PROPOSED ORDER

NOTICE OF FILING DOCUMENT IN THS OTHER DIVISION, FATHIYUSUF'SRESPONSE TO HAMED'S COMMENTS CONCERNING THE COURTS PROPOSEDWND-UP PI.ANSUBNMITTED BY GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

Page 6 of 37

11tO712014

11tO712014

'ft'utodtzott

{ rtoazou

1012912014

10//2812014

{ totzatzo'tt

1012812014

'10i24l2014

ff rotzuzou

* totzstzot¿

þ rorztlzort

& ßtzstzot¿

f totzttzott

1012112014

TRANSCRIPT FILED BY COURT REPORTER RANDALL JON BELSVIK FOR

TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE HELD OCTOBER 7,2014

COUNTERCI.AIM DEFENDANT W LLI E HAMËD'g.ßEPLY TO FATHI YUSUF'SOPPOSITION AS TO THE 1011512014 MOTION TÖ.SHOW CAUSE FILED BY

ATTORNEY CARL HARTMANN, III WTH EXHIBITA

FATHI YUSUFAND UNITED CORPORATION'S RESPONSES TO JOINT MOTION TOCOMPEL FILED BY CHARLOTTE K. PERRELL, ESQ

JOINT OPPOSITION OF PI.AINTIFF AND THE HAMED COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS

TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO COMPELSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

RENB/VED MOTION TO SHOWCAUSE RECEIVEDSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE DATED OCTOBER 15,

2014 FILED BY AfiORNEY NIZAR WTH EXHIBITA-DECI.ARATION OF J

DEWOODOHN GAFFNEY

FATH I YUSUF'S COMMENTS, OBJ ECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERN ING

THE COURTS PROPOSED PI.AN FILED BYATTORNEY GREGORY H . HODGES WTHEXHIBITA.MAP

PLÂINTIFF HAMED'S COMMENTS RE PROPOSEDWNDING UP ORDERSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

MOTION TO SHOWCAUSE RECEIVEDSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

FATHIYUSUF'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR SUMII/!\RY ORDERDIRECTING ELECTION OF PLESSEN DIRECTORSSUBMITTED BY GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

ORDER SOLICITING COMMENTS, OBJECTIONSAND RECOMMENDATIONS SIGNED BY

JUDGE DOUGLASA. BRADY

NOTICE OF ENTRYOF ORDER10lo7no14JOEL HOLT, ESQ.;CARL HARTMANN III, ESQ.NIZAR DE\AÍOOD, ESQ.; GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.MARK ECKARD, ESQ.; JEFFREY MOORHEAD, ESQ.HON. EDGAR D. ROSS (edganossjudge@hotmail.com)

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF WAHEED HAMED,

MUFEED HAMED, HISHAM HAMEDANDWALEED HAMED RECEIVED FROMATTY.GREGORY HODGES

RECORD OF PROCEEDING COMPLETED

SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY TO OPPOSITTON TO MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TODISCOVERY REQUESTSAND FOR SANCTIONS FILED BY CHARLETTE K. PERCELL,

ESQUIRE.

DEFENDANT FATHI YUSUF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY

REQUESTSAND FOR SANCTIONSAS TO WAHEED HAMEDAND PROPOSED ORDERFILED.

DEFENDANT FATHIYUSUF'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY

REQUESTS AND FOR SANCTIONS AS TO MOHAMMAD I-IAMED AND WALEED HAMED

AND PROPOSED ORDER FILED BY CI-üARLOTTE K. PERCELL, ESQUIRE.

JOINT MOTION BY PTAINTIFFAND EOUNTERCI.AIM DEFENDANTS TO COMPELRESPONSESTO DISCOVERY

SUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

1012112014

It ßndzott

* 10//08//2014

1010712014

1010712014

10t07t2014

10t0712014

10t06t2014

10t06t2014

10t06t2014

10t0612014

PageT o137

0.00

1010312014

10t0312014

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS'SUPPTEMENTAL RULE 26(aXlXA)DISCLOSURES

SUBMITTED BY CHARLOfiE PERRELL, ESQ.

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONAND RESPONSESTOCOUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED'S ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR THEPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS JOINTLYTO FATHIYUSUFAND UNITEDCORPORATION

SUBMITTED BY CHARLOTTE PERRELL, ESQ.

AMENDED NOTICEOF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL RULE26(aXlXA) DISGLOSURESSUBMITTED BY CHARLOTTE PERRELL, ESQ.

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE AND CROSS.MOTION FOR SIMII.AR

RELIEF GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS'SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26(aXiXA)DISCLOSURES

SUBMITTED BY CHARLOTTE PERRELL, ESQ.

EMERGENCY MOTION TO FURTHER EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINESANDORDERSUBMITTED BY GREGORY HODGES, ESQ.

SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM RECEIVED ISSUED TO NEJAH YUSUFSUBM]TTED BYJOEL HOLT, ESQ.

SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM RECEIVED ISSUED TO MAHER FATHI YUSUFSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM RECEIVED ISSUED TO YUSUF YUSUFSUBMITTED BY JOEL HOLT, ESQ.

NOTICE OF F¡LINGAFFIDAVITS OF SERVICE OF SUBPOENADUCESTECUMDIRECTED TO BPPR REGARDING ACCOUNTS OF MOHAMMAD HAMED; SUBPOENADUCES TECUM DTREOTED TO BPPR REGARDING ACCOUNTS OF MUFEED HAIIIED;

SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM DIRECTED TO BPPR REGARDING ACCOUNTS OF WALEEDI{AMED F¡LED BY CI.IARLOTTE K. PERCELL, ESQUIRE & NIZARA. DEV\IOOD,

ESQUIREATTACHMENTS INCLUDED

AFFIDAV¡T OF SERV¡CE OF RENIX CHARLES OF TRUE COPY OF SUBPOENA DUCES

TECUM OF SANADAHENRICKSON FOR CUSTODÙ{N OF RECORDS FOR RECORDS

PERTAINING TO WALEED HAMED

AFFIDAVIT OF SERV]CE OF RENTX CHARLES OFATRUE COPY OF SUBPOENADUCESTECUM FOR SAMDAHENRICKSON FOR CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR

RECORDS PERTAINING TO MOHAMMAD HAMED

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF RENIX CHARLES OFATRUE COPY OF THE SUBPOENADUCESTECUM FOR SANADAHENRICKSON FOR CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR

RECORDS PERTAININGTO MUFEED HAMED

PI.AINTIFF MOHAI\./IIVIAD HAMED'S NOTICE OFTENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RULEDISCLOSURES AND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' I 1 /1 5/1 3DOCUMENT REQUESTS

SUBMITTED BY CARL HARTMANN III, ESQ.

NOTICE OF COUNTERCI.AIM DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED'S SUPPLEMENTALPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

SUBMITTED BY CARL HARTMANN III, ESQ.

MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND, MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO

STRIKE JURY DEMANDAND ORDERSUBMITTED BY JUSTIN HOLCOMBE, ESQ.

10t0112014

10t0112014

09t3012014

o913012014

09//3012014

o9t3012014

09t3012014

0913012014

o9t3012014

09t3012014

o9t30t2014

ogt30t2014

o9t3012014

0912912014

Page I of 37