delft2013rw

7
____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Click to edit Master title style • Click to edit Master text styles – Second level • Third level – Fourth level » Fifth level 1 Review editor chapter 13 WGI Roderik van de Wal, Utrecht University Sea Level Change in AR5

Upload: tu-delft-climate-institute

Post on 30-May-2015

369 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

On 17/10/2013 TU Delft Climate Institute organised the symposium The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets: present, future, and unknowns. This is one of the four presentations given there. http://www.tudelft.nl/nl/actueel/agenda/event/detail/symposium-tu-delft-climate-institute-17th-october-2013/

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Delft2013rw

____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

• Click to edit Master text styles– Second level• Third level

– Fourth level» Fifth level

10/18/13 1

Review editor chapter 13 WGI

Roderik van de Wal, Utrecht University

Sea Level Change in AR5

Page 2: Delft2013rw

____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

• Click to edit Master text styles– Second level• Third level

– Fourth level» Fifth level

10/18/13 2

What drives sea level changes?

Figure 13.1 AR5

Page 3: Delft2013rw

____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

• Click to edit Master text styles– Second level• Third level

– Fourth level» Fifth level

10/18/13 3

Antarctica+Greenland

AR4

Antarctica more constrained, Greenland decay rate fasterShepherd et al 2012

AntarcticaGreenland

Page 4: Delft2013rw

____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

• Click to edit Master text styles– Second level• Third level

– Fourth level» Fifth level

10/18/13 4

Cryospheric contribution

Extended version of Fig 4.17 AR5

Page 5: Delft2013rw

____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

• Click to edit Master text styles– Second level• Third level

– Fourth level» Fifth level

10/18/13 5

Future projections

Figure 7b, SPM

+40-50%

Page 6: Delft2013rw

____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

• Click to edit Master text styles– Second level• Third level

– Fourth level» Fifth level

10/18/13 6

AR5 versus AR4

So for +4K 1/3 caused by increased response; 2/3 by higher offset! (commitment) ice sheets..

Page 7: Delft2013rw

____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond levelThird level

Fourth levelFifth level

Click to edit Master title style

• Click to edit Master text styles– Second level• Third level

– Fourth level» Fifth level

10/18/13 7

Concluding remarks-Sea level recent passed reasonably explained

-Sea level response per degree increased

-Sea level regional variable

-Sea level projections higher

Unknowns-coastal processes-temporal variability-low probability issues