democracy and disruptive power
DESCRIPTION
Democracy and Disruptive Power. How the masses change public policy. Outline. C.B. Macpherson’s Models Frances Fox Piven’s Disruptive Power. Macpherson’s Analysis. Main forces of change Ethical concerns. Forces of Change. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Democracy and Disruptive Power
How the masses change public policy
![Page 2: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OutlineC.B. Macpherson’s ModelsFrances Fox Piven’s Disruptive Power
![Page 3: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Macpherson’s Analysis
1. Main forces of change2. Ethical concerns
![Page 4: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Forces of Change1. “underlying reality of the
prevailing or past relations between wilful and historically influenced human beings” and
2. “the probability or possibility of future changes in those relations” (3)
![Page 5: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Ethical Concern“Certainly all historical experience confirms the truth—that man would not have attained the possible unless time and again he had reached out for the impossible” (Weber 1978:128)
![Page 6: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Models’ Assumptions
about society and its people. On the latter point, two important questions emerge:
1. what do people think is democracy?
2. what do people think it should be?
![Page 7: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Earlier Models Defined democracy as the rule by the people, so the assumption was that it was a classless or a one-class society.
![Page 8: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Liberal Democracy Assumes
CapitalismClass inequalityMarket mediates between capitalists and workers
![Page 9: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Participatory Democracy
must come from existing practices, desires and ideas of people
it must contain “equal right of every man and woman to the full development and use of his or her capabilities” (114)
![Page 10: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Unit of Analysishow can we mediate between Macpherson’s individualism and a collectivist understanding of social mobilization?
![Page 11: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Frances Fox Pivenpeoples’ protests are most effective when they act “outside of electoral norms;” this is when electoral-representative procedures are more likely to realize their democratic potential” (2)
![Page 12: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Democratic Idealperiodic electionsParties aggregate atomized voters Limit executive powerUnicameral legislaturesSpecified short termsOpen legislative deliberations
![Page 13: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
US Reality Increasing inequalityUncontroversial issues (parties)Lobby powerPlutocracyTrust in Washington: 75% in 1964; less than 20% in 1990s
![Page 14: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Paul Krugman“our political system has become utterly, and perhaps irrevocably, corrupted” (cited on p. 13)
![Page 15: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Yet, Popular Achievements
Most democratic institutionsAbolition of slaveryNew Deal and workers’ rights (1930s)
Civil Rights (1960s)
![Page 16: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
How has this happened?
“rare intervals of nonincremental democratic reforms are responses to the rise of disruptive protest movements, and the distinctive kind of power that these movements wield” (18)
![Page 17: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Disruptive power “. . . democratic successes flow not from the influence of voters and parties taken by themselves, but from the mobilization of a more fundamental kind of power that is rooted in the very nature of society, in the networks of social interdependence or cooperation that society implies. I call this disruptive power . . .” (18)
![Page 18: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Interdependence“. . . the leverage inherent in interdependencies is potentially widespread, especially in a densely interconnected society where the division of labor is far advanced” (20). Disruption = activation of interdependent power. Protest movements mobilize disruptive power.
![Page 19: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Disruption“a power strategy that rests on withdrawing cooperation in social relations [it] may be noisy . . . and it may be disorderly and violent, but whether the withdrawal of cooperation takes these forms is entirely contingent” (23)
![Page 20: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conditions to engage in disruption
1. How people understand social relations.2. Rule breaking.3. Coordination.4. Overcoming constraints.5. Withstanding disruption.6. Withstanding threat to end
interdependency relation.
![Page 21: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Rules (“. . . work to suppress the actualization of the interdependent power inherent in social cooperation”, p. 27)
![Page 22: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Explaining US’ Big Bangs (1930s and
1960s)Historical institutionalismReformers and experts’ ideas Power elite theories Electoral shifts and realignments
![Page 23: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Future“intimate connection between what people think is possible in politics and what they think is right” (141).
![Page 24: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The Future
“People do not complain about the inevitable, and certainly they do not mobilize to change what they think is inevitable, but once new possibilities . . . are evident and within reach, popular aspirations also expand” (141-142).
![Page 25: Democracy and Disruptive Power](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568163ab550346895dd4bcf0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Conclusion“the mobilization of collective defiance and the disruption it causes have always been essential to the preservation of democracy” (146). My question is whether we can still consider that the United States has a democracy worthy of the name.