demonstration of sem-based irt in mplus
DESCRIPTION
Overview Section 1—Introduction to Mplus Section 2—Exploratory Factor Analysis Section 3 – Basic Assumptions of IRT Section 4—Confirmatory Factor Analysis 2 PL Model Section 5 – Questions and DiscussionTRANSCRIPT
1
Demonstration of SEM-based IRT in Mplus
Frances M. Yang, Ph.D.1,2
Doug Tommet, M.S.1
Richard N. Jones, Sc.D.1
1Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Gerontology, HMS and
2Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, [email protected]
August 23, 2007
2
Overview
• Section 1—Introduction to Mplus• Section 2—Exploratory Factor Analysis• Section 3 – Basic Assumptions of IRT• Section 4—Confirmatory Factor Analysis
– 2 PL Model• Section 5 – Questions and Discussion
3
Section 1
Introduction to Mplus
4
• www.statmodel.com• Used to be LISCOMP, owes lineage to LISREL• Does just about everything other continuous
latent variable / structural equation software implement (LISREL, EQS, AMOS, CALIS)
• Plus, very general latent variable modeling– Continuous latent variables (latent traits)– Categorical latent variables (latent classes, mixtures)– Missing data– Estimation with data from complex designs
• Expensive, demo version available
5
Formatting Data for Mplus
• Individual-level data• Summary Data (correlations, covariances,
means, standard deviations)• ASCII Data
– Raw text– Fixed, Free format
6
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/mplus/faq/default.htm
7
How to write a Mplus command file
• Get the Users Manual• Print it, read it, live it, love it• Find a similar example• Hack the example to suit your problem
8
Mplus Commands
• TITLE• DATA• VARIABLE • ANALYSIS• MODEL• OUTPUT
• DEFINE• PLOT• SAVEDATA• MONTECARLO
9
Section 2
Exploratory Factor Analysis
10
Exploratory Factor Analysis in Mplus (v.4)
• Observed outcomes variables can be: – continuous– binary– ordered categorical (ordinal)– combinations of these variable types
11
Mplus Input FileTITLE: This is an example of an exploratory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators DATA: FILE IS S:\project~1\dif\Short~1\Data\cesd.csv;VARIABLE: NAMES =depress lonely sad effort restless
nogetgo noenergy nohappy noenjoy age gender ethnic edu;
USEVARIABLES ARE depress-noenjoy; CATEGORICAL=depress-noenjoy;
MISSING ARE ALL (-9999) ;ANALYSIS: TYPE =missing efa 1 3 ; ESTIMATOR=wlsmv;
12
Mplus VERSION 4.2MUTHEN & MUTHEN05/29/2007 3:31 PM
INPUT INSTRUCTIONS
TITLE: This is an example of an exploratory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators DATA: FILE IS S:\projectdata1\dif\Short~\Data\cesd.csv; VARIABLE: NAMES =depress lonely sad effort restless nogetgo noenergy nohappy noenjoy age
gender ethnic edu; USEVARIABLES ARE depress-noenjoy;
CATEGORICAL=depression-noenjoy; MISSING ARE ALL (-9999) ;ANALYSIS: TYPE =missing efa 1 3 ; ESTIMATOR=wlsmv;
INPUT READING TERMINATED NORMALLY
This is an example of an exploratory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Number of groups 1Number of observations 9448
Number of dependent variables 9Number of independent variables 0Number of continuous latent variables 0
Observed dependent variables
Mplus Output
13
Binary and ordered categorical (ordinal) DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY
Estimator WLSMVMaximum number of iterations 1000Convergence criterion 0.500D-04Maximum number of steepest descent iterations 20
Input data file(s) S:\projectdata1\dif\Short~\Data\cesd.csv;
Input data format FREE
SUMMARY OF DATA
Number of patterns 1
COVARIANCE COVERAGE OF DATA
Minimum covariance coverage value 0.100
PROPORTION OF DATA PRESENT
Covariance Coverage DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS 1.000 LONELY 1.000 1.000 SAD 1.000 1.000 1.000 EFFORT 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 RESTLESS 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOGETGO 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENERGY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOHAPPY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENJOY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
14
PROPORTION OF DATA PRESENT
Covariance Coverage DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS 1.000 LONELY 1.000 1.000 SAD 1.000 1.000 1.000 EFFORT 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 RESTLESS 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOGETGO 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENERGY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOHAPPY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENJOY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Covariance Coverage NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY ________ ________ ________ ________ NOGETGO 1.000 NOENERGY 1.000 1.000 NOHAPPY 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENJOY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL DATA PROPORTIONS
DEPRESS Category 1 0.834 Category 2 0.166 LONELY Category 1 0.808 Category 2 0.192 SAD Category 1 0.792 Category 2 0.208 EFFORT Category 1 0.755 Category 2 0.245 RESTLESS Category 1 0.728 Category 2 0.272 NOGETGO Category 1 0.769 Category 2 0.231
15
NOENERGY Category 1 0.550 Category 2 0.450 NOHAPPY Category 1 0.887 Category 2 0.113 NOENJOY Category 1 0.931 Category 2 0.069
RESULTS FOR EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
EIGENVALUES FOR SAMPLE CORRELATION MATRIX 1 2 3 4 5 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 5.164 1.041 0.794 0.592 0.488
EIGENVALUES FOR SAMPLE CORRELATION MATRIX 6 7 8 9 ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.308 0.250 0.193 0.169
EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS WITH 1 FACTOR(S) :
CHI-SQUARE VALUE 1518.714 DEGREES OF FREEDOM 22 PROBABILITY VALUE 0.0000
RMSEA (ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR OF APPROXIMATION) : ESTIMATE IS 0.085
ROOT MEAN SQUARE RESIDUAL IS 0.0889
ESTIMATED FACTOR LOADINGS 1 ________ DEPRESS 0.860 LONELY 0.736 SAD 0.837 EFFORT 0.712 RESTLESS 0.563 NOGETGO 0.688 NOENERGY 0.544 NOHAPPY 0.810 NOENJOY 0.837
16
ESTIMATED RESIDUAL VARIANCES DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.261 0.459 0.299 0.493 0.683
ESTIMATED RESIDUAL VARIANCES NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.527 0.704 0.344 0.299
FACTOR DETERMINACIES 1 ________ 1 0.965
EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS WITH 2 FACTOR(S) :
CHI-SQUARE VALUE 652.653 DEGREES OF FREEDOM 16 PROBABILITY VALUE 0.0000
RMSEA (ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR OF APPROXIMATION) : ESTIMATE IS 0.065
ROOT MEAN SQUARE RESIDUAL IS 0.0551
VARIMAX ROTATED LOADINGS 1 2 ________ ________ DEPRESS 0.770 0.400 LONELY 0.723 0.256 SAD 0.842 0.270 EFFORT 0.406 0.639 RESTLESS 0.374 0.438 NOGETGO 0.238 0.846 NOENERGY 0.228 0.585 NOHAPPY 0.752 0.338 NOENJOY 0.750 0.387
17
PROMAX ROTATED LOADINGS 1 2 ________ ________ DEPRESS 0.768 0.143 LONELY 0.776 -0.014 SAD 0.916 -0.051 EFFORT 0.208 0.604 RESTLESS 0.261 0.371 NOGETGO -0.095 0.937 NOENERGY 0.012 0.620 NOHAPPY 0.774 0.074 NOENJOY 0.749 0.136
PROMAX FACTOR CORRELATIONS 1 2 ________ ________ 1 1.000 2 0.652 1.000
ESTIMATED RESIDUAL VARIANCES DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.247 0.412 0.219 0.427 0.668
ESTIMATED RESIDUAL VARIANCES NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.228 0.606 0.320 0.288
FACTOR STRUCTURE 1 2 ________ ________ DEPRESS 0.861 0.644 LONELY 0.767 0.492 SAD 0.883 0.547 EFFORT 0.603 0.740 RESTLESS 0.503 0.541 NOGETGO 0.517 0.876 NOENERGY 0.417 0.628 NOHAPPY 0.822 0.579 NOENJOY 0.837 0.624
18
FACTOR DETERMINACIES 1 2 ________ ________ 1 0.962 0.931
EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS WITH 3 FACTOR(S) :
CHI-SQUARE VALUE 158.402 DEGREES OF FREEDOM 11 PROBABILITY VALUE 0.0000
RMSEA (ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR OF APPROXIMATION) : ESTIMATE IS 0.038
ROOT MEAN SQUARE RESIDUAL IS 0.0222
VARIMAX ROTATED LOADINGS 1 2 3 ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS 0.728 0.347 0.350 LONELY 0.721 0.235 0.223 SAD 0.805 0.341 0.219 EFFORT 0.419 0.182 0.615 RESTLESS 0.382 0.149 0.421 NOGETGO 0.272 0.142 0.813 NOENERGY 0.047 0.404 0.589 NOHAPPY 0.463 0.727 0.234 NOENJOY 0.411 0.768 0.300
PROMAX ROTATED LOADINGS 1 2 3 ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS 0.694 0.143 0.144 LONELY 0.756 0.037 0.021 SAD 0.833 0.147 -0.037 EFFORT 0.273 -0.040 0.602 RESTLESS 0.298 -0.024 0.380 NOGETGO 0.038 -0.096 0.898 NOENERGY -0.238 0.345 0.599 NOHAPPY 0.301 0.717 -0.046 NOENJOY 0.205 0.766 0.038
19
PROMAX FACTOR CORRELATIONS 1 2 3 ________ ________ ________ 1 1.000 2 0.563 1.000 3 0.572 0.563 1.000
ESTIMATED RESIDUAL VARIANCES DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.227 0.375 0.187 0.412 0.655
ESTIMATED RESIDUAL VARIANCES NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.244 0.488 0.203 0.151
FACTOR STRUCTURE 1 2 3 ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS 0.857 0.615 0.622 LONELY 0.790 0.475 0.475 SAD 0.894 0.594 0.522 EFFORT 0.595 0.453 0.736 RESTLESS 0.502 0.358 0.537 NOGETGO 0.498 0.431 0.866 NOENERGY 0.299 0.549 0.658 NOHAPPY 0.679 0.861 0.530 NOENJOY 0.658 0.903 0.587
FACTOR DETERMINACIES 1 2 3 ________ ________ ________ 1 0.946 0.935 0.925
Beginning Time: 13:41:02 Ending Time: 13:41:03 Elapsed Time: 00:00:01
20
21
NOENERGY Category 1 0.550 Category 2 0.450 NOHAPPY Category 1 0.887 Category 2 0.113 NOENJOY Category 1 0.931 Category 2 0.069
RESULTS FOR EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
EIGENVALUES FOR SAMPLE CORRELATION MATRIX 1 2 3 4 5 ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 5.164 1.041 0.794 0.592 0.488
EIGENVALUES FOR SAMPLE CORRELATION MATRIX 6 7 8 9 ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.308 0.250 0.193 0.169
EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS WITH 1 FACTOR(S) :
CHI-SQUARE VALUE 1518.714 DEGREES OF FREEDOM 22 PROBABILITY VALUE 0.0000
RMSEA (ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR OF APPROXIMATION) : ESTIMATE IS 0.085
ROOT MEAN SQUARE RESIDUAL IS 0.0889
ESTIMATED FACTOR LOADINGS 1 ________ DEPRESS 0.860 LONELY 0.736 SAD 0.837 EFFORT 0.712 RESTLESS 0.563 NOGETGO 0.688 NOENERGY 0.544 NOHAPPY 0.810 NOENJOY 0.837
22
Scree Plot with Parallel Analysis
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Eig
enva
lue
1 3 5 7 9Factor
23
A Note on Good Model Fit
• Model fit is based on how close the model-implied covariance matrix is to the observed covariance matrix
• Chi-Square should be low, P-value high• CFI > 0.95 (max 1)
– Bentler. Psychol Bull, 1990; 107:238-46.• RMSEA < .05 (min 0)
– Hu & Bentler. Psychol Meth, 1998; 4:424-53.
24
Section 3
Basic Assumptions of IRT
25
Basic Assumptions
• Unidimensionality– In IRT models a single latent trait is sufficient to
characterize individual differences, for example– Single common factor– Multiple factors proportionally loading in items
• Strong local independence– Probability of responding u is independent of other
test item responses, conditional on
26
Section 4
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
27
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
y
y *
1
2
1
2y * *
*
33*
*
1
28
Mplus InputTITLE: This is an example of a confirmatory factor analysis (Page 47, Example 5.1)DATA: FILE IS S:\projectdata1\dif\Short~\Data\cesd.csv;DATA: FILE IS S:\project~1\dif\Short~1\Data\cesd.csv;VARIABLE: NAMES =depress lonely sad effort restless
nogetgo noenergy nohappy noenjoy age gender ethnic edu; USEVARIABLES ARE depress-noenjoy;
CATEGORICAL=depress-noenjoy; MISSING ARE ALL (-9999) ;ANALYSIS: TYPE=missing h1;MODEL: f1 by depress* lonely sad;
f1 by effort* restless nogetgo noenergy; f1 by nohappy* noenjoy;
f1@1; OUTPUT: Standardized ; Sampstat;
29
Mplus VERSION 4.2MUTHEN & MUTHEN05/29/2007 3:31 PM
INPUT INSTRUCTIONS
TITLE: This is an example of an exploratory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators DATA: FILE IS S:\projectdata1\dif\Short~\Data\cesd.csv; VARIABLE: NAMES =depress lonely sad effort restless nogetgo noenergy nohappy noenjoy age
gender ethnicity education; USEVARIABLES ARE depress-noenjoy;
CATEGORICAL=depression-noenjoy; MISSING ARE ALL (-9999) ;ANALYSIS: TYPE =missing efa 1 3 ; ESTIMATOR=wlsmv;
INPUT READING TERMINATED NORMALLY
This is an example of an exploratory factor analysis with dichotomous indicators
SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS
Number of groups 1Number of observations 9448
Number of dependent variables 9Number of independent variables 0Number of continuous latent variables 0
Observed dependent variables
Mplus Output
30
Binary and ordered categorical (ordinal) DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY
Estimator WLSMVMaximum number of iterations 1000Convergence criterion 0.500D-04Maximum number of steepest descent iterations 20
Input data file(s) S:\projectdata1\dif\Short~\Data\cesd.csv;
Input data format FREE
SUMMARY OF DATA
Number of patterns 1
COVARIANCE COVERAGE OF DATA
Minimum covariance coverage value 0.100
PROPORTION OF DATA PRESENT
Covariance Coverage DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS 1.000 LONELY 1.000 1.000 SAD 1.000 1.000 1.000 EFFORT 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 RESTLESS 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOGETGO 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENERGY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOHAPPY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENJOY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
31
PROPORTION OF DATA PRESENT
Covariance Coverage DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS 1.000 LONELY 1.000 1.000 SAD 1.000 1.000 1.000 EFFORT 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 RESTLESS 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOGETGO 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENERGY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOHAPPY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENJOY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Covariance Coverage NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY ________ ________ ________ ________ NOGETGO 1.000 NOENERGY 1.000 1.000 NOHAPPY 1.000 1.000 1.000 NOENJOY 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL DATA PROPORTIONS
DEPRESS Category 1 0.834 Category 2 0.166 LONELY Category 1 0.808 Category 2 0.192 SAD Category 1 0.792 Category 2 0.208 EFFORT Category 1 0.755 Category 2 0.245 RESTLESS Category 1 0.728 Category 2 0.272 NOGETGO Category 1 0.769 Category 2 0.231
32
NOENERGY Category 1 0.550 Category 2 0.450 NOHAPPY Category 1 0.887 Category 2 0.113 NOENJOY Category 1 0.931 Category 2 0.069
SAMPLE STATISTICS
ESTIMATED SAMPLE STATISTICS
MEANS/INTERCEPTS/THRESHOLDS DEPRESS$ LONELY$1 SAD$1 EFFORT$1 RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.970 0.871 0.814 0.691 0.607
MEANS/INTERCEPTS/THRESHOLDS NOGETGO$ NOENERGY NOHAPPY$ NOENJOY$ ________ ________ ________ ________ 1 0.737 0.126 1.208 1.483
CORRELATION MATRIX (WITH VARIANCES ON THE DIAGONAL) DEPRESS LONELY SAD EFFORT RESTLESS ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ DEPRESS LONELY 0.668 SAD 0.768 0.732 EFFORT 0.641 0.452 0.485 RESTLESS 0.490 0.380 0.469 0.449 NOGETGO 0.500 0.435 0.464 0.642 0.451 NOENERGY 0.332 0.280 0.324 0.432 0.347 NOHAPPY 0.694 0.533 0.666 0.474 0.382 NOENJOY 0.668 0.554 0.660 0.507 0.367
CORRELATION MATRIX (WITH VARIANCES ON THE DIAGONAL) NOGETGO NOENERGY NOHAPPY NOENJOY ________ ________ ________ ________ NOENERGY 0.561 NOHAPPY 0.411 0.452 NOENJOY 0.464 0.515 0.817
33
TESTS OF MODEL FIT
Chi-Square Test of Model Fit
Value 1518.715* Degrees of Freedom 22** P-Value 0.0000
* The chi-square value for MLM, MLMV, MLR, ULS, WLSM and WLSMV cannot be used for chi-square difference tests. MLM, MLR and WLSM chi-square difference testing is described in the Mplus Technical Appendices at www.statmodel.com. See chi-square difference testing in the index of the Mplus User's Guide.
** The degrees of freedom for MLMV, ULS and WLSMV are estimated according to a formula given in the Mplus Technical Appendices at www.statmodel.com. See degrees of freedom in the index of the Mplus User's Guide.
Chi-Square Test of Model Fit for the Baseline Model
Value 21648.365 Degrees of Freedom 17 P-Value 0.0000
CFI/TLI
CFI 0.931 TLI 0.947
Number of Free Parameters 18
RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error Of Approximation)
Estimate 0.085
WRMR (Weighted Root Mean Square Residual)
Value 5.108
34
MODEL RESULTS
Estimates S.E. Est./S.E. Std StdYX
F1 BY DEPRESS 0.860 0.008 109.210 0.860 0.860 LONELY 0.736 0.011 69.603 0.736 0.736 SAD 0.837 0.008 102.718 0.837 0.837 EFFORT 0.712 0.011 67.231 0.712 0.712 RESTLESS 0.563 0.013 43.687 0.563 0.563 NOGETGO 0.688 0.011 60.101 0.688 0.688 NOENERGY 0.544 0.012 43.776 0.544 0.544 NOHAPPY 0.810 0.010 79.757 0.810 0.810 NOENJOY 0.837 0.011 72.882 0.837 0.837
Thresholds DEPRESS$1 0.970 0.015 63.143 0.970 0.970 LONELY$1 0.871 0.015 58.694 0.871 0.871 SAD$1 0.814 0.015 55.846 0.814 0.814 EFFORT$1 0.691 0.014 49.059 0.691 0.691 RESTLESS$1 0.607 0.014 44.003 0.607 0.607 NOGETGO$1 0.737 0.014 51.703 0.737 0.737 NOENERGY$1 0.126 0.013 9.771 0.126 0.126 NOHAPPY$1 1.208 0.017 71.194 1.208 1.208 NOENJOY$1 1.483 0.020 75.536 1.483 1.483
Variances F1 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 1.000
35
IRT PARAMETERIZATION IN TWO-PARAMETER PROBIT METRICWHERE THE PROBIT IS DISCRIMINATION*(THETA - DIFFICULTY)
Item Discriminations
F1 BY DEPRESS 1.682 0.059 28.515 LONELY 1.086 0.034 31.931 SAD 1.530 0.050 30.733 EFFORT 1.013 0.031 33.168 RESTLESS 0.682 0.023 29.816 NOGETGO 0.947 0.030 31.681 NOENERGY 0.649 0.021 30.813 NOHAPPY 1.380 0.050 27.458 NOENJOY 1.532 0.070 21.780
Item Difficulties DEPRESS$1 1.128 0.021 52.807 LONELY$1 1.184 0.027 43.068 SAD$1 0.972 0.020 47.779 EFFORT$1 0.970 0.025 38.621 RESTLESS$1 1.077 0.036 30.269 NOGETGO$1 1.071 0.028 37.877 NOENERGY$1 0.232 0.024 9.556 NOHAPPY$1 1.492 0.030 50.224 NOENJOY$1 1.771 0.036 48.838
Variances F1 1.000 0.000 0.000
36
R-SQUARE
Observed Residual Variable Variance R-Square
DEPRESS 0.261 0.739 LONELY 0.459 0.541 SAD 0.299 0.701 EFFORT 0.493 0.507 RESTLESS 0.682 0.318 NOGETGO 0.527 0.473 NOENERGY 0.704 0.296 NOHAPPY 0.344 0.656 NOENJOY 0.299 0.701
QUALITY OF NUMERICAL RESULTS
Condition Number for the Information Matrix 0.688E-01 (ratio of smallest to largest eigenvalue)
Beginning Time: 14:06:22 Ending Time: 14:06:24 Elapsed Time: 00:00:02
37
Factor Analysis of Binary Variables (IRT)
y 3
1 1y
4y
1
2y 2
3
4
2
3
4
*
*
*
*
y 3
1y
4y
2y[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
y* = + VAR(y*) = '
VAR() =
assuming VAR() = 1
a = 1-2
b =
38
Item Characteristic Curves(ICCs)
39
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
DEPRESS
40
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
LONELY
41
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
SAD
42
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
EFFORT
43
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
RESTLESS
44
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
NOGETGO
45
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
NOENERGY
46
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
NOHAPPY
47
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00P
roba
bilit
y of
End
orsi
ng S
ympt
om
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
NOENJOY
48
0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.00
Pro
babi
lity
of E
ndor
sing
Sym
ptom
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Latent Trait Level
DEPRESS LONELYSAD EFFORTRESTLESS NOGETGONOENERGY NOHAPPYNOENJOY
49
Where to go for more information
• http://www.statmodel.com/
• http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/
• http://www.utexas.edu/its/rc/tutorials/stat/mplus/
• http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/lta.htm
50
Mplus Short Course
• Dates: March 2008 and August 2008
• Instructors: Bengt O. Muthén and Linda Muthén, creators of Mplus
• www.statmodel.com
51
Section 5
Questions andDiscussion