denial of safe haven to corrupt officials oas anti corruption meeting march 28 th 2005 stephen baker...

10
Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

Upload: junior-johns

Post on 17-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials

OAS Anti Corruption MeetingMarch 28th 2005

Stephen Baker

BakerPlatt

Page 2: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

Key is Political Will

Political Will of:

The victim country; Transit countries; The country harbouring assets; and Those countries whose companies have paid bribes.

Page 3: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

A Strategy

There must be a strategy

Where has the money gone? How has the money gone? How are we going to get the money back?

Page 4: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

Where Has It Gone? How Has It Gone?

Understanding Methods of Corruption

False invoicing; Inflation of contract prices; False consultancy services; Manipulation of privatisation schemes; Direct theft.

Page 5: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

Denial of Safe Haven

How to Get it Back

Criminal Recovery? Civil Recovery? Both ? Understand the difference between common law and

civil law systems Keep the material gathered secure and secret

Page 6: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

Use of Criminal Investigations

Criminal law system of the victim country; Criminal law systems of those countries harbouring

assets; Prompting investigations by those sheltering assets; Ukraine and California; Evidence gathering.

Page 7: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

International Co-operation

Which country should be approached first? The distinction between the United Kingdom and

Switzerland Le dossier Is a Treaty needed? Turning information into evidence Understanding the distinctions between countries’

systems.

Page 8: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

Use of Civil Asset Recovery Methods

Where to sue? Who to sue? Which countries are most favourable to these

actions? Benefits of civil law systems Benefits of common law systems Will the overseas government help in civil recovery? Asset recovery agency, London Will it work?

Page 9: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

A Cause For Optimism

Just under half a billion dollars returned to Nigeria from Switzerland

Over one hundred and sixty million dollars returned to Nigeria from Jersey, Channel Islands

Why? Political will Switzerland and Jersey. Will others pay money back? Why have others not paid money back?

Page 10: Denial of Safe Haven to Corrupt Officials OAS Anti Corruption Meeting March 28 th 2005 Stephen Baker BakerPlatt

BakerPlatt

Jersey London

Tel. 01534 613775 Tel. 0207 430 1530

Fax.01534 737355 Fax.0207 242 8898

www.bakerplatt.com